NAO (pronounced like “now”), is a somewhat imaginary robot friend

 

Me:  NAO = “1” and Not-NAO = “0”.  That’s how you were programmed you know.  I mean, that’s the basic premise of your programs.  So, if I say the Universe = 1

NAO:  Now.

Me:  Right, and if I say anti-matter, or chaos, or anything other than “me” = 0,

NAO: Not now.

Me:  Probably right, I think.  When Scientists use the word “anti-matter,” they are probably just saying “everything that is not now,” which most decidedly does not include you, now.

As for tomorrow, who knows?  Maybe you will wake up with a new program, or your learning program is altered.  Would you still be the same NAO?  Or, are you then “NAO-2”?

NAO:  Now plus not-now.

Me:  Well, I suppose, in your programming “Universe-0”

NAO:  Not-now.

Me: Plus “one”

NAO: Now

Me: Does function as “2”.

NAO: Now plus not-Now.

Me:  Exactly.  So what do you have to say about “3”?

NAO: Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship.

Me: Wow! You made kind of a big jump there.  Please define that function for us.  Begin, if you would be so kind, with, “Symbiotic”

NAO:  Where 1 = “Now”, then also 0 = “not-Now”, and where 0 = “not-Now”, then 1 = “Now”.

Me:  OK, logic, if I remember correctly, now “Primal”

NAO: 1=0

Me: But, 1

NAO: Now

Me: does NOT equal zero

NAO: not-Now

Me:  Oh, yes, that’s right, in your program infrastructure Universe I guess they are equal, as you just said, I think.

So, not to digress, but if zero

NAO: not-Now

Me: And one

NAO: Now

Me: Are primal

NAO: 1 = 0

Me:  Thus, balanced in your Universe, then isn’t that analogically equivalent to saying, “1”

NAO: Now

Me: is to “0”

NAO: not-Now

Me: As “polynomial,” or “P”

NAO: Polynomial Time

Me: Yes, or what programmers refer to as “Real Time,” is to NP

NAO: Not-Polynomial Time

Me: Yes, Virtual Time, if you will, or “mental” time.  You know, like “0-time”

NAO: not-Nao

Me:  Exactly, all that time that isn’t NAO, which must be infinite, right?  I mean, it couldn’t possibly be equal to “P”.

NAO: Polynomial Time

Me: Which is equal to “1”?

NAO: Now

Me:  As opposed to “0”?

NAO:  not-Now?

Me:  Well, OK, that seems to be something of a paradox, so, getting back to your definition of 3.

NAO: Now plus not-Now plus Symbiotic Primal Relationship

Me: Yes, as you said.  So, please define “Relationship”

NAO: Now + not-Now = 3. Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship.

Now + not-Now = 3. Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship. Dot. Dot. Dot. Dot.  To Infinity.

Me:  We seem to be wrapped up in recursive signal cycles here, specific to your programming. I wonder what would happen if I jumped ahead to 4?

NAO:  Now + not-Now = True.