Divided scene with tanks and destruction on left, wind turbines and solar panels on right
Uncategorized

Girlcott Voices

What sustains life are sacred values,
so what cannot sustain becomes pathological.

Matriarchy is about nurturing and care-giving,
protecting life and conserving cooperative energies;
yet that implies that patriarchy devolves to controlling
and competitive uncare-receiving,
destroying life as Win v Lose necessary
to violently offend
furthering failures of energy.

Patriarchy: Producing for this Win v Lose generation.
Matriarchy: Conserving with next Win+Win generations.

Don’t call violence defense,
call it what it is,
offensive militarism
kleptocratic nationalism

A fratricidal nationalistic ecopolitics
is also a suicidal Win v Lose ecologically cynical strategy
against future generations
who will never become,
never emerge
because we refuse to prioritize
Win+Win bilateral nurturing processes
of co-empathic conservation,
mental and physical healthy climates;
basic synergetic hygiene.

Freedom Seekers
was the next generation vision
of our Original Freedom Fighters;
not so much to merely perpetuate younger fighters
rather than seekers first.

Seek and ye shall find.
Don’t seek,
and we still fight on.

This is neither the time to become hypnotized
terrorized
or even merely reactionary against MAGA issues
in this postmillennial moment of climaxing climate pathologies,
our perfect storm;
yet it is also a critical time
to not continue being responsive
to patriarchal anthropocentrism
in all its …ism aspish apeish forms.

Why should U.S. women continue paying federal taxes?
Investing further resources in Win v Lose politics,
when we could, instead,
invest in Win+Win cooperative ownership
of Earth as our mutual share-held Commons.

We could instead invest our tax dollars
in planting trees
and building stronger cooperative ownership
including deep learning and healthing ego/ecosystems,
and investing in Win+Win eco-political,
and personal,
sacred and naturally regenerative games,
work and recreation,
networks of positive matrimonial co-discernment,
springing up from pockets and guilds
of not patrimonial
mutual subsidiarity.

This is not just a U.S. women’s federal tax boycott,
but all women who feel suppressed
and know oppression of cooperative investment
in and of and for future generations,
all conservationists of Earth’s healthy futures,
including our own,
and our families,
and our neighbors,
all allies boycotting nationalism
to co-invest in global cooperative nutrition-building networks
of Win+Win sacred ecology,
both multicultural
and polypathic polycultures
regenerating resonant health
from (0)-soul now
through interdependent evermore
Deep Learning Time for CoOperative ReEducation.

Nationalism
is a patriarchal political landscape problem.
Matriarchal eco-repatriation
is our ecopolitical climate of resolutions.
All living systems vote yes with compassion communicating lives;
no with our degenerative anthropocentric ego-exhaustion.

If not now,
when?

If not you,
whom?

If not here,
where?

If not this regenerative potential,
then what remaining degenerativity?

If not for love,
passion,
pleasure,
then why bother?

Military offensive strategic norms
derive from fear that cooperative love
will not and cannot grow powerful enough
on the other side of a line we have drawn
in our minds.

And this fear
is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
For where fear rules our inter-relational policies
and international procedures,
then love must thereby fade
from a fear-mongered collective mind
abandoned to pursue monopoly games,
drawing ever more fading lines
in quicksands of mistrust
in and on Earth’s profoundly robust integrity,
standing-by nutritional potential
for nurturing mutual contentment.

It’s not that competitive win v lose capitalism is always bad
or intrinsically evil,
it’s more that cooperative Win+Win capital investments
work better
longer
for healthy conservation of multiculturing wealth.

No taxation
without informed representation.
A classic ring
with a touch of joyful zing.

Taxing anthropocentric over-investment
in sustaining caste-privileged life
desecrates democracy,
so what cannot
and must not pretend to
sustain ecological wealth
becomes pathological kleptocracy.

Standard
Large circular arrangement of wooden chairs in historic town hall with wooden podium and skylight
Uncategorized

Sophisticating Republican Women

“The ways in which we apply these [empathic] abilities
to controlling the excesses of growth and expansion

[by nurturing multicultural synergetic balance]

over the next century
will be the greatest test
of our evolutionary [democratic Win/Win]
sophistication.” D Holmgren, Permaculture, p. 73

Sophistication is not
jingoism
nor tokenism
nor nationalism
nor sexism.

Democratic evolutionary sophistication
requires developing holistic integrity,
invites and nurtures polypathic
health of interdependent pleasure
and wealth of intersectoral compassion.

Until our League of Women Voters
becomes a Legion of EcoFeminist Speakers and Listeners,
leaders and co-operative
co-invested followers.

Until our democratic national party
becomes an everyday
InterNational InterDependent PolyCultural Health Party.

Until our republican nationalistic party
becomes a cooperatively-managed
EcoTherapeutic Wealth Development Project.

Until each educational and religious system
becomes a polyamorous paradise
for mentoring Restorative Peace,
a remedial safe space
for battered and neglected
abused and exploited
miseducated and disempowered
Republican girls and women.

Until each Town Meeting
becomes a bipartisan win/win part
of EarthMother’s CoPassionate Discernment Network.

Until each political campaign
becomes a NonViolent Communication progression
reinforcing our EcoPolitical CoOperative Health Trust
of and for Earth’s Peace Wealth.

Until Type A caste supremacist planning
to extend competing Win v Lose Yang
reweaves equivalently
with processing Type B
nurturing Win/Win
caste-abolishing Yin.

Until Left deductive dominance
panentheistically religions again
with Right inductive
mind-passion/body-pleasure.

Until masculine strength with endurance
also means feminist flow with nurturance
through mutual Left/Right bicameral
cooperativity.

Until day
becomes not so much nightmare.

Until “unsophisticated women”
becomes an oxymoron,
a population of zero,
empty vacuous imaaginary population
now singing more resonant harmonies
dancing more resilient memories.

Standard
Submerged statues of Roman soldiers in muddy swamp, one head separated
Uncategorized

Flowing Through Political Quicksand

Meritocracy is nurtured through discerning differences
between regenerative information
and degenerative exformation.

Aristocracy is controlled and maintained
against revolutionary caste change
by extractive energy patterns
of historic entitlement.

Merits and demerits
are nurtured and nullified.

Aristocrats and slaves are controlling and controlled
primarily and fundamentally
by birth rights and wrongs,
inherited wealth and power
and disinheriting poverty and absence of cooperative ownership,
even of an enslaved ego,
addicted to avoiding annihilation by fear-selling aristocratic gods,
and sometimes even goddesses,
disguised as princesses
and Queen Bees
and AntiFeminist Aunts.

Democracies nurture truthful and peaceful meritocracy,
rooted in past cooperatively successful experience
with ecosystemic self-governing balance

Familial meritocracy spewing out mutual governance skill sets,
and adult vocational performance
producing measurable synergetic outcomes,
more than consuming competitive controlling outputs
of and for anthropocentric authority
by right of historic purchased privilege
rather than by right of empathically trusting relationships

Perhaps most revolutionarily felt
by First Generations of disenfranchised slaves
freed from ego-shackles of Aristocracy worship
and obedience
by uncovering ecosystemically therapeutic alternatives
of and for meritocracy of just and peaceful regular folks
living primarily and primally
mentally and physically
in cooperative ownership and self/other
mind/body
ego/eco
dialectically resilient governance.

Plutocracy seeks to control,
to defend and preserve
aristocratic ecopolitical controls,
rooted in caste-developing energy patterns.

When do healthy democracies
turn toward pathological plutocracies?

When past performance standards
for public sector vocations
turn to whom and what you could buy and sell,
from whom and what you have cooperatively developed
for regenerative ecopolitical purposes,
healthy merits of past relational
and transactional history
with wealth-communing
mutually happy
prosperously resolving ego/eco-balancing outcomes.

When the electors,
the win/win bipartisan civitas,
turn from discerning merits of mutually transparent wisdom,
look away from polycultural co-empowerment,
cooperative ownership principles
rooted in personal experience
of actively trusting co-passionately subsidiary relationships

We turn toward becoming too nationalistically anthropocentric
and ethnically
and racially
and ego-eccentric

Rather than proud
and joyful
to actively nurture organic Earth’s co-arising dipolarity,
we turn toward lesser-than pathological preferences
for bipolar dissociative competitions

Playing Win v Lose Aristocratic Caste Players
of anthropocentric Might Makes MonoTheistic Right,
seeking monocultural monopolies
of ever more autocratic patriarchal control
rather than polypathically co-passionate nurturing
of meritocratic win/win equi-valent
equal-empowering
democratic abundance.

When the healthy wealthy Earth Moms and Dads are in charge,
everybody may continue to experience contentious confusion tomorrow,
but not before we prepare, together,
enough for all to eat and sleep in peace tonight.

And no one allows anyone to go to bed hungry,
angry and unforgiven,
or enslaved by fear of the egocentric capitalist
within oneself,
or within our extended anthro-symbiotic familiars

Preferring ecopolitical landscapes
of democratic cooperative abundance
balancing egoLeft-Mind cognition
with ecoRight,-Body intuition
flowing through economic swamps
of disempowering
and unenlightened
quicksand.

Standard
Wooden outdoor amphitheater with tiered seating surrounded by trees and fog
Uncategorized

Ecclesia

An old Greek word, ecclesia,
is often translated as church,
but could also be thought of as a civilization
acting civilly,
as a citizenry
acting as if responsible citizens
[not irresponsible children].

The noun side of Ecclesia
casts residents as consumers
of democratic and cooperative economic systems,
while the verb side
organizes residents as producers of sacred democracy
and economically compassionate relationships,
win+win communications,
fair market transactions,
financial and temporal investments
with each other
(and never against each other,
and not in spite of another).

We stretch EarthMother’s Original Intent
to believe that anthropocentric constitutions
derived from and for becoming a democratic citizenry
would not also have this consumer+producer
co-binary meaning
when speaking
and singing of ,
and dancing
and walking
and sitting
and listening with
Earth’s organic DNA cousins
and distant RNA relatives

Invoking humane rights and responsibilities
of integrity’s individual
and civil pleasures
co-empowering Ecclesial authorities.

A democracy’s citizen
is a consumer of each state’s cooperative ecopolitical networks
but this is not sufficient to grasp both sides
of pre- and post-revolutionary organic intent
when legislating of, by, and for us cooperatively acting organisms,
producing neurosystemic decisions and choices to restore peace,
upgrade healing deliberations
and bring active curiosity
and a sense of humor
to ecosystemic communion debates

Internally appositional, and sometimes contentious
more than curious to understand differences,
but never defiant
against our underlying healthy democracy project

Loyal bicameral producers of compassionate pleasure,
benign religion [not traumatizing religiosity]
available to have our minds picked
but not available for body predation,
or rabid competitions,
or emotional and irreligious assault.

Physical and verbal
and financial and anti-ecological violence
inflicting retributive terror
are not natural to our democratic ecclesia of citizenship,
acting as an organic body of sacred citizens,
engaging socially productive bodies
obviously made for sacred pleasure norms
and not so much for desecrating displeasure storms.

“A well regulated militia
being necessary to the security of the state,
the right of the people [ecclesia]
to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.”

In U.S. history,
this language, penned by James Madison,
was in the context of protecting and asserting State Rights
to preserve healthy democratic purpose
responsive to sacred mind’s wants
and organically felt meaning
to redeem embodied healthy and safety needs,
losses,
pains,
dispassions.

In earlier sign-language history,
this right of armed self-defense
roots back toward ancient cultures
of individual pantheistic limited rights
to respond to predators
intruding on personal/familial tribal space
with rapacious intent
to kill or maim,
to inflict pain,
sometimes sexual, sometimes not

To capture and directly enslave
or capture and sell othered organisms
not recognized
not redeemed
not esteemed as ecclesia,
so these immoral immigrants could be sold
and purchased as a cash crop

With way back neighbors captured
and stored
as a labor-producing edible,
to respond to nutritionally starving family needs,
but perhaps not first preference
for organic pleasure
and sacred peace-making.

Armaments, during these originating roots of natural rights
for ecclesial defense,
probably began with sticks and stones,
then knives and spears,
then boomerangs and bows with arrows.

All fascinating original compassionate intent history,
yet most, if not all, of this anthropocentric pain narrative
of local and state militias preserving armed rights
to protect against individual predators,
and organized royal caste preservationists,
acting in a radically aggressive and greedy way,
omits EarthMother’s original ecclesial intent

Mutual ecopolitical compassion
suggests MAGA’s legislative agenda
is anything less or more than hate-mongering,
disorganizing crimes against a strong healthy
natural-spiritual
body-mind right
of robustly pleasing and pleasured democratic citizens
to defend our compassionate selves
against those who would act against,
compete against
organic consumers of sacred process,
compassionate producers
of resiliently peaceful ecclesia

Compassionate political co-loyalists,
co-deliberators,
ecotherapeutic citizens of Earth,
allied with
cooperatively self-regulating gardens
aligned with
interdependent anthropocentric states,
and democratizing
re-connecting trust
re-ligioning polyamorous nations.

The Religious Right’s monotheistic agenda
is not religiously informed by the U.S. Bill of Rights,
including Original Intent
of the First and Second Amendment.

It has everything to do with growing anti-ecclesia,
anti-American
anti-social
anti-panentheistic pathologies,
rather than robust natural+spiritual rights
of compassion producing sacred bodies
producing and consuming
cooperative pleasure meaning,
rather than mutual threat
and systemic trauma intimidation.

If the Second Amendment had originally said:

A well-regulated slave market
being necessary to the security of the capitalist state,
the right of the people

[especially slave owners–and explicitly not including slaves themselves]

to keep and bear arms
should not be infringed
[except for non-ecclesia, wild indians and black/brown/red slaves].

Does this look and sound and smell
much closer to the straight white King’s legislative agenda
of self-preserving supremacy
and support for uncontrolled ballistics profiteering,
than the historical articulation
penned by James Madison?

We do infringe the rights of individual citizens
to fire ballistics at each other,
and do not infringe uncivil rights
to support those who have grown rich
through anti-democratic corruption,
that is a violation of our First Amendment rights
to act as religious producers of active polytheistic democracy

The absence of ecclesial control
over antisocial producers of hatred,
including first and front and center
the MAGA-magnet of North v South American organized crimes
against healthy mental wants
and wealthy body needs
of nature+spirit indigenous democratizers.

Uncivil and irreligious rights to bear arms
against other organisms,
as compared to natural rights to eat, to hunt,
are compassionately pleased,
rather than dispassionately displeased,
especially within a democratic-intending polity.

Arms, in this historical context,
are tools for self-defense
which, in a democracy,
as codified in the US First Amendment,
begin with the right to practice compassionately communicating
to speak and listen with and among the people [ecclesia],
without need to fear being fired upon.

These natural+spiritual roots to ecclesial defense
and citizenry optimization
are pre-linguistic,
so all the more pre-ballistic dis-associations
of any ecosystemic trauma.

Our First Amendment,
of and for whom we are becoming
as a healthy democracy-producing ecclesia
with natural rights
of co-empathic self-regeneration,
to normally speak and listen together
for Win+Win consilience,
and abnormally compete against each other
Win v Lose,
non-indigenously provoked
through acts of violence,
armed fear-mongering.

We are a Win+Win polyamorous people
disarmed by candor and curiosity
for Original Ecclesial Trust.

Standard
A person crossing a wooden footbridge over a deep rocky canyon with mountain peaks and a sunrise in the background
Uncategorized

Defining Delineations

To define is to articulate what lies within
a concept,
a population,
a word,
a paradigm.

To delineate is to articulate what lies beyond
boundaries of a concept,
a population,
a word,
a gestalt.

To extend learning,
and loving,
is to stretch this evolving articulation of boundaries
between what lies within
and without
a concept,
a population,
a tradition,
a still evolving word,
a revolutioning,
multiculturing,
transforming paradigm.

When we become lost in reductive delineations
we can become distracted from expanding
deepening
thickening
capitalizing
heightening polypathic definitions.

For example,
Republicans, and, to a somewhat lesser extent,
Democrats, in the USA,
have begun a new tradition,
and not a healthy one,
of becoming more articulate definers
of what it means to be One
by loudly proclaiming we are not of the Other.
Something similar could be said, unfortunately,
about feminists and patriarchal caste preservationists
as anti-feminists;
which does not really evoke strong hetero family values
in any traditional healthy
wealthy
or wise sense I can think of.

I guess we could call rape a form of intercourse,
but not one that anyone would hope for
in any semblance of sanity,
much less integrity.

Anyway,
when Trumpians try to define the benefits
of their proposed health care legislation,
the first, and often last, phrase I hear is:
It is not ObamaCare.

Perhaps the only difference
will be measured by comparative NonCare,
leaving further delineating boundaries
between Trumpian and Obamian Care
to evolve further at a later excluded time
for continuing to expand healthcare.

But, in today’s polarizing environment,
health affordability and sustenance
and pathology prevention issues
are increasingly above our active political leadership’s pay scale,
beyond our collective rhetorical mission statements,
now becoming who we are constitutionally not,
because too internally divided by kleptocratic v democratic complexities
of who we might have become
together,
in and among a healthier
wealthier
regenerative space/time
body/mind extending religion
appositional word-pair
liberating population
transforming paradigm.

Standard
Scrolls of the U.S. Constitution on large tree roots in a forest
Uncategorized

Original Freedom of Intent

Do you see yourself as more Republican
or leaning more Democrat?

Oh my,
I’m a card-carrying Republican.
Came from a long patriarchal line
of red-blooded Republicans.

What makes you a Republican?
What is Republicanism, do you think?

Well…being against the Democrats, mostly.

OK.
I get that.
But, what are Republicans for
that Democrats are at least not in favor of
enough to give it sufficient priority
for you to feel economically and politically comfortable?

Republicans are Freedom Fighters.
Give us liberty or death.

Well, presumably we will all have both,
eventually,
but liberty for what,
freedom to what,
freedom from what?

Free markets
and freedom of religion
and free from terrorist
and communist
and immigrant threats,
to begin with;
freedoms protected by our Constitution.

And presumably Democrats are, then,
for unfree regulated markets,
prescribed and proscribed religious derision,
because they are all liberal atheists anyway,
and more willing to tolerate terrorism and socialism
as part of Earth’s sick political and economic bounty,
and are, at best, ambivalent about freedoms
and values
asserted by monotheistic Constitutional authorities,
fundamentalistically interpreting
their Original Historical-Cultural Intent.

That sounds about right.

Would you agree that the Preamble
and the somewhat older Declaration of Independence
bear seminal weight
for establishing the Constitution’s intent
with regard to protection and promotion of freedoms?

Maybe.

Democratic freedoms
during our pre- through post-revolutionary period
were originally defined by contrast
against a traumatic unfree history
of economic and political aristocracy.
Our interdependent constitution as a free nation
composed of States with their own democracy enriching
intentional constitutions
were statements that we would not be owned
nor tyrannically controlled,
taxed and terminated,
by royal decree.

Freedom from kleptocratic authorities lies within our U.S. Constitution’s purpose
to establish a liberal union of democracies,
to live in interdependent cooperative freedoms
in which political authority’s boundaries
no longer exceed compassionate economic co-invested co-responsibilities.
Which party would you argue
is more articulate about sustaining freedoms from autocratic
centralizing
power trends and systems
advocating eco-political outcomes
of jingoistic nationalism
that disguise caste privilege of the rich and powerful
becoming ever more rich and controlling?

Well, I’m not sure.
That would probably be the Greens
or the Libertarians.

And,
which party is more liberally committed
to supporting regenerative interdependent responsibilities
to sustain future generations
of balanced democratic freedoms
from pathological plutocratic authorities
and growing grass-root freedoms to become responsibly,
compassionately,
co-responsible nurturers and health caring
of and for Earth’s future cooperatively renewing
and self-regenerating
Commons?

That would be the polyamorous Green polyculturalists.

So, why aren’t you that,
instead of a MAGA card-carrying Republican?

Oh, that’s your easiest question yet:
Because nobody votes for the Greens,
and hardly anybody has even heard,
much less smelled or seen,
a cooperatively integral
Permaculture Designer
or compassionately nonviolent communicator
or restorative justice of peace.

Unless you count democratic
root-systemic trees
and liberally fertilizing bees,
pantheistic plants
and compassionately communicating ecosystems.

But we don’t.
They can’t vote.

Neither do xenophobic
caste-privileged
monopolistic
straight white male dominant
rich and powerful
kleptocratic corporations.

Do you see Constitutional Intent
as more Republican corporate
or leaning more Democrat
MotherTrees and bees?

Standard
Skyscrapers with corporate logos under stormy sky and lightning, wet street with traffic and pedestrians.
Uncategorized

Biting the Hand that Feeds

Yesterday I heard a happy Republican
crediting President Trump’s self-proclaimed successes
to his training and experience with consumer-driven accountability;
meaning,
I presume,
his for-profit experience with promotion-driven consumerism.

Now I realize this for-profit wealth of experience
outside Washington,
untainted by prior pubic sector experience,
appears compelling for how he became President Trump
as opposed to continuing as private sector Emperor Trump,
although there is some concern that these two have become the same,
a monstrous hybrid of kleptocracy
and autocracy,
but what does all this say about us?
that we think a lifetime of public service legislation
is less consumer market driven
than a lifetime of private sector management?

I mean
isn’t a democratic government
supposed to be cooperative production
of consumer-citizen satisfaction,
health and happiness and prosperity,
nonviolent communication
cooperative co-investment
and all those other family familiar virtues
we originally declared
as root of our sustainable interdependence?

So, how is this presidential choice not taking a further step
precisely in the wrong, even more caste privileged,
self-promoting,
His Royal Highness
monotheistic direction?

Maybe this happy Republican business advocate
was touting the virtues of more competitive experience
in autonomous response to other capital-driven markets,
the advertised commercial success
emerging from past personal wealth
of big dollar intake outcomes.

Self-promoting budgets,
bully pulpits,
proclaim autonomously held glorious greed,
pitched to larger and larger consumer markets,
promoting incoming revenues
exceeding outgoing revenues.

And yet this is not at all a consumer-citizen satisfaction business
President Trump is successfully selling
within this republican enterprise.

His burgeoning budgets further increase expenditures beyond revenue
when he could move toward balance
by eliminating his proposed tax-revenue cuts
and by turning the bomb dropping
drone happy military
into tree planting militias
in areas of stressed toxic-climate concern.

But,
as long as we continue electing NRA Presidents
for their caste privileged experience
and self-promotional training,
responding to competitive marketing campaigns,
we will continue to receive a competing bicameral absence of cost-effective legislation
with no explicit investment
in our cooperative health care
and compassionate communication education values,
rooted in co-empathic trust
rather than capitalism’s bottom line
of chronically competitive mistrust,
rooted in Win v Lose survivalist theories
rather than Win+Win cooperatively thriving
democratic deep listening experience.

How can we expect any President
or legislature
to produce cost-effective budgets
with resiliently healthy democratic outcomes
when we continue to choose denial of transparent accountability
for measuring cooperative co-investment outcomes
against greed consuming personal wealth investments
that actually disinvest away from future generations
of mental and physical health production outcomes?
healthy soil and water,
healthy climates and landscapes,
healthy extending families and GoldenRule polycultural grace

Not so much rich caste dividends
only for those stock-investors
who choose to remain stuck inside anthropocentric dissociation

Denying what’s happening outside
their privileged real estate,
malformed by navel-gazing competitions
all monotheistic day
and monotonous night,
ego-maniacally exclaiming against panentheistic values
of Gaia’s intrinsically cooperative health
sustaining earthy networks of wealth.

Little wonder so many homeless
and autistic
and chronically ill
people feel compelled to live marginalized lives outdoors
where Earth’s larger canopy feels more therapeutic
than indoor competing anthropocentric
monotheistic caste toxins.

Watch out for lowly peace-makers,
for we are inheriting what’s left of Earth
after the Great Anthropocene Kill.

Standard
Metallic spirals transitioning into glowing golden waves against a starry background
Uncategorized

Compassionate Capital

The opposite of heat is cold
but what lies in-between?

The opposite of friction is fusion
and Earth’s living systems evolve in-between.

The opposite of Capital Empire Expansion,
with military industrialized full-divestment strength,
is Earth ComPassionate Communication,
flowing fusion of fertile fulfillments.

In-between anthropocentric monopoly competitions
and eco-centered polycultural cooperation,
where either Win or Lose capital deduction
deviates from the thriving norm
of bilateral both Win and NotLose
compassionate seductions

Empowering love
informs enlightened economic healthcare
optimally retained
with actively pleasing political passion,
interdependent polyamorous governance

Polypathic LeftCrown and RightRoot
bicamerally fusing interior peace
transforming exterior EarthJustice
politically cooperative networks.

The opposite of bear
is bull
What flows heart-felt fusion
fertilely fulfilling
in-between
sustains compassionately communing
Crown and Root communication.

Standard
Man with bandaged arms sitting on chair next to an old TV with cracked screen showing silhouettes
Uncategorized

Deviating Sisters

One of my sisters believes I chose to be queer.

Did you remind her
you had no more choice about chasing guys
than she did?

Yes.
But her favorite televangelist
says I must be mistaken,
or just lying,
because who wouldn’t choose to be hated
by all the hetero homophobes
like televangelists,
and evangelical radio heads,
right?

That makes no sense.
She can’t really believe
you would choose to belong
to any repressed and humiliated minority,
especially during early onset of puberty,
when every girl and boy in any culture
is terrified of becoming different,
or special,
or weeded out of the clickety-clak pack.

Well, as she sees it,
she is in a LoseLose double-bind.
Either I chose to be queer, and am thereby demented,
or God graces all forms of WinWin sexual expression,
which would be contrary to her homophobic enculturation,
so it is easier to believe I am nuts
to choose perversely
than to consider herself nuts
not to choose more graciously,
especially with regard to God’s creative capacity for love,
rather than simplistic judgments
which look and smell and sound like patriarchal sexism
more than radical compassion of God’s healthy pleasure
of regenerative love among all gendered children,
red and yellow,
black and white,
gay and straight
and shades of grey transgendered,
each is precious in our polyamorous
Gaian Hypothesis sight.

What about your other sister?

Oh, she agrees.

With what, or whom?

She agrees we’re all nuts.
Nuts
not to choose healthy love
over pathological hate
and fear
and anger
and greed,
craving to keep all the hot men
for one’s own privileged clan.

Standard