What are some differences between casual conversation and more discernment-intended dialogue?

Dialogue may be rooted in diapraxis, in turn regeneratively learned through the primal orthopraxis of verbal patterns and rhythms, forms with functions and “right”-pitched frequencies.

Discussion and discernment seem difficult through merely written language symbols, iconic logos, because these words and their patterns emerged from our more richly “meme” composted praxis, practice, incarnation, being and becoming, both our Right and Left hemispheres are diapraxis progenitive.

Spatial and temporal delivered “story-telling” information contextualizes both the purpose of language as objective-nomial symbol-content but also emerges, evolves our shared context of intuited choice intention as verbal, verbed, active, action-becoming communication and information for us within this specific rhetorical context. Word choice, pitch frequencies, rhythm, pattern and flow, alliterative intention, metaphors of action and verb choice each contribute allegorical, analogical Information to our emergent positivist dynamic of language-stringing within this moment’s eco-logic; eco-logos lying both positively intended and enthymematically within dialogue’s continuing invitational potential.

Orthopraxis, as a regenerative replacement for facilitated discernment, derives from “orthopsychiatry,” prophylactic psychiatry concerned especially with incipient mental and behavioral disorders (Webster’s Collegiate). Diapraxis is an emergent culture of communication and information-gathering skill-sets with roots in multisystemic and integral therapy, skilled Dynamic Facilitators able to reflect and summarize ecological language patterns, Positive Deviance therapists, EcoMinisters and EcoTherapists.

Orthopraxis is an ecological and permacultural frame for fusing Right-hemispheric intuitive temporal orthodoxy with Left-hemispheric deductive, reflective, and octavely-patterned sensory  intent and practice. Diapraxis reiteratively and redundantly informs through what we do and do not do, in dialogue with what we say and do not say; a primal fractal frame for collectively imaging our emergent orthopraxis.

This communication and information-systemic transition from focused dialogue, expanding toward focused and disciplined diapraxis may culturally synergize with older, more religious philosophical paradigms and memes like “compassionate mindfulness” and “love.”

Buckminster Fuller understood and intended the dynamics and geometrics of “love” as analogically and ecologically equivalent to double-bound appositional flow of time-mutual awareness; synergy is dia-ergetic, mutually positively grateful and gravitational. Fuller’s synergy may be to Basic Positive Attendance as his comprehension is to compassionate mindfulness.