Uncategorized

The (O)PermaCultured Equinox Legend

PRELUDE: The Parable of the Heron and the Beaver

Dr. Heron and Dr. Beaver were dialogically inseparable, if you will.  That is, Dr. Beaver loved to provoke Dr. Heron’s short, and relatively benign, temper, especially about his Religion Department’s naivete.  Pre-natally naive, perhaps, according to Beaver’s Communication Design Department.  That’s just the way they, collectively, saw it, and heard it, for that matter.  Meanwhile, the otherwise unapproachable and silent, downright reclusive and perhaps even forbidding, Dr. Heron would listen, occasionally too surprised to respond, sometimes with a confused and stressed, “Shawk!”, but always with profoundly wise gaze, of course.  How could we have a parable without an allegorical “wise gaze?”

While Dr. Heron perched and peered with unusual fascination, tending to be a bit myopic (adroitly, but profoundly, denied), Dr. Beaver swam by, near enough to be noticed, in fact, rather hell-bent on distraction, in a playfully purposive way.

Truth be told, which does erupt occasionally, Dr. Beaver, on this morning, ever so slightly, slowly, VEXED Dr. Heron.  Beaver invited Heron’s play, but Heron simply was not known as a playful kind of girl.  Upon hearing this, Beaver suggested they swim together.  While Dr. Heron preferred the wind’s freedom, she gracefully bowed, then lead the way, and Beaver stopped splashing and wriggling about so…. “I don’t know, so ‘vigorously,’ I think.” (Oops, did I say that out loud?  Can they hear me?)

Swiftly amused by Heron’s bi-polar control issues, Beaver paried with the synonym choice, “heartily, as well as ‘vigorously’.”

“Quite so.” Heron parsimoniously admitted, immediately grasping the wisdom of Beaver’s inviting option.

As they swam their leisurely way through the cool green mossy pond’s edge, paddling, each in His and Her way, toward the gently rippling, blue-gleaming, center, Heron remembered the beautiful dam, now behind, invisible.

“Yes, my best so far, but it wants color to be the best.”

Dr. Heron was flustered.  How did Beaver know what she was thinking?  And, what an extraordinary idea!  Adding color would be wrong, she was sure a dam had no business wanting to become a rainbow.

“Oh, no, that would just make it tacky.” replied Beaver, delighted with Heron’s naive misunderstanding.  “Beavers have a powerful Developer’s Cooperative Guild. Very high Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) architectural integrity standards, as they officiously say.  Now, visual color, that would be more Dr. Chameleon’s Department, over in Arts and Humanities.  Perhaps you are too young to recognize the difference from the Communications Design Department.  They are visual color, but our specialty is auditory color.

“Hmmm.  I am surprised.”

“Yes, I hear that.”

“You mean, you understand that?”

“Yes, both. OK, now you want to play me, I see.”

“No, not that, please!  Though, I would appreciate seeing why you use “hear” synonymously with “understand.”

“If you were not so blind, it would probably hit you right between the eyes.”

Dr. Heron contemplated that for an extrava-gently long time, in Beaver’s impatient-to-play moment.  Perhaps an iteration would remove them from their quagmire, he thought, guiding Dr. Heron around a lily pad patch, where Dr. Swan was gracefully resting, waiting.  For what, she never said.  Always just “Waiting.” in reply to his too frequent interruption.

Seeing a butterfly flexing her silky wings atop the closest lily, Dr. Beaver asked Dr. Heron why she never sang in round octaves.

“You mean color octaves.”

“Yes, color octaves are round.”

“That cannot be right.”

“It can, when you realize it deeply enough.”

“But, color lacks shape.  And why is this dialogue backward?”

“Not long ago you didn’t think color had sound either, but I hear you already using the way we see things over in the Communications Department.”

“I can envision color as metaphor for singing scales.”

“Oh yes, scales are linear color, not round color, like a wheel, you see?  Those are two symmetrical frequencies. Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. Positive and Negative. Before and After. Or, official labels, in Design circles, you know, are ‘Yang Color’and ‘Yin Color’.”

“So which is which?”

“No, no, which is never-‘which’, and vice-versa.”

“You have a backward way of confusing things, considering you are supposed to be the Communications Design Department.”

“Yes, well Confusion is our Special Field Theory you know; its an important part of Communications, or not.  Most Herons don’t sync like you do.”

“Why is that?” asked Dr. Heron, scrambling how to respond with freeing her blindness.

“They know Confusion is too soft for building dams.  It is, of course.  But, while I soften to your touch, I have elder cousins rambunctiously and fibrously scaled.”

“Really Dr. Beaver, please pick an octave and stick with it!”

“I do!” protested Beaver, without influence.

“It is difficult to synchronize when you insist on frolicking so! While I am blissfully silent myself, with considerably more normal events, I have many younger cousins singing multiple octaves and patterns.  Further, while I appreciate the beauty and extreme generosity of our historic Design scales, it would be wrong to reduce them to mere sticks for resplendent dams.”

“Do it all the time. Sticks are under-valued for scales, as are Alligator or Armadillo scales.”

“And these ‘low-valued scales’ don’t mind being trapped, denied their value-freedom? I ask because I cannot see. They are too low for eyes, or ears, and thinking.”

“If you can’t hear my dams’ goodness, then how do you see its full beauty?”

Beaver stopped paddling as they emerged with the sun-drenched pond. A change of mood inspired a new, and old, direction.

“I know! What if you and your tribe of cousins gently built your nests into my damn? Then we could all hear and see its transformation. I’m sure we can connect your round octaves to our columned scales!”

Drs. Heron and Beaver have made their rapturous home together ever since.

OVERTURE

“I call heaven and earth to record that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life.”  Deuteronomy 30:19

“To be, or not to be, that is the question.  Hamlet, William Shakespeare

“If we paid more attention to self-adjustment and obedience, and less attention to petulant meddling with the wheels of its going, we should find living immensely worth while and the universe the best imaginable friend.” Magic Wells: Sermons…, Rev. Julian Clifford Jaynes

Sirius Meets Janus

Each bloody boundary includes a risky door,

ajar,

toward Sirius’ dialogue,

waiting impatiently, vigorously, frequently rhythmically tapping her raw foot,

protectively vulnerable cloaked arms crossed,

terrified shoulders hunched,

brightly glaring at your door,

hoping you will “Finally!” open it:

Impulsively, not from lack of forethought,

Joyfully, anticipating her warm grace-filled,

yet sometimes too loud!

body hug.

Heron’s Religion Department 101 Lecture:

Think of Gaia as being one frequency-based Whole System, Rational.  Within that metric context, the human species’ body is, with RE mature adult’s, composed of proportionally = frequency levels.  Equal to Gaia’s that is, as understood from a globally accessible-as-normative wisdom-base.  When these frequency levels exceed P=NP = (Yang e = Yin e), then our shared historical-cultural global community awareness, defined as “T” that + = (-), and 1 = pi/0, is the oldest and wisest metric system based assumption, as evinced Universally, and in more exemplary analogically-rooted documents captured in B. Fuller, W. Thurston (Special Case: “Rational System”), then Euler’s efunction, inclusive of Temporal, then Muhammed, Origen, Remi, M. Maier, St. Anthony of Padua, Confucius, and most certainly Pythagoras.  The original relationship (“L”) = Yang-e divided Octavely by Yin-e, with 0/0 dissonance based “f“.

Tom Atlee, Joanna Macy, the NCDD, William Thurston, Thomas Kuhn, Buckminster Fuller, Robert Norton and perhaps even Julian Jaynes, in his own BiCameral way, invite us to join them in adopting the hypothesis that our globally inter-communicated “power-from-within” capacity is now increasing to an edge-frequency level of dissonance, with new World Wide Web capacity to both measure and adjust it.  Their wisely-shared underlying STEM-based hypothesis is, unless I am mistaken, of course, that Yang-e divides rationally when Yin-e frequencies  are evenly divided by Yang-e, and vice-versa (i.e., transposition has Information Value), Universal Infinite System Assumption = 0 = [West-Hemisphere = (1/”pi”=e)] +  [East-Hemisphere = (“pi”/e) historically/culturally equivalent to “We’re all in this together.”].

Beaver’s  “Body Hug” Dream:

Come on, all of us in the Communications Systems Design Cooperative Guild have been agreeing to that CQI Standard since, well, since as far back as we have had a Guild, even back through our richly diverse, and diversely logos-ed artifacts…like “sticks,” for example.  But, that reminds me of a story….

Scene 1: Aries Rams Forth

Dedication

First, to my four Transition Generation kids, by adoption, my Heart-Path Partner Jerome Dye, and, by intentional extension, Kerry Dillenbeck, Jeremy Read, Dale Martin, Robert Fournier, Sue DeShaine, Catherine Hogan, and, most magnificently, Kathleen Brennan.

As you know, my health is not what anyone would put in the caegory of “Excellent!”  Some days, it only feels “fair.”  I started out to write down all the things I really should have told Dillen and Spencer, now 18, and 16, rspectively.  That point of origin led me to this Re-Analogic Transposition Theory.  More importantly, along the way, I was repatedly reminded that, not only are well all in this together, but that each of you, in your own diverse journey, has taught me how to understand my own.  You have richly endowed my Universe with your combined wisdom, our combined “power-with’within” as my Exegetical Tribe, if you will.  Our love is all.

Secondly, but penultimately, not at all marginally, my thanks to Joanna Macy, Tom Atlee, Robert Norton, Buckminster Fuller, Thomas Kuhn (and his Problem of Incommensurability), Deacon Peacock (Supervenience Theory), Willem Drees, Julian Jaynes, and William Thurston, whose journeys on “Spaceship Earth” have overlapped my own, my profound respect. You have each deeply graced my life.

Finally, to my local Man/Sha emergent tribe, please accept this invitation to explore this PermaCulture value economy together.  If you can find your Bridge to the rainbow’s Boson, I hope we can cooperatively reach back and, combining our wisdom-from-within, patch up my Jerry-mandered Opus.

GD, Sept. 21, 2013

Scene 2: Beta-Site Beginnings

One day, as twilight approached, Dr. Beaver, exhausted, flipped over on the pond’s surface, slapped his contented tail a few times, and drifted into the cool shadow of Dr. Heron’s magnificent nest.

 Scene 3: Calculated Conniving

Beaver: I do love living here below Dr. Heron, but I wish she wouldn’t shable so with Dr. Penny Peacock, Science Department, when she visits.

Scene 4: De-Minored Differentiated “Self”-Analogos

This probably came to mind due to a relatively raucous event earlier that day, when Peacock had not only come for a drink, as per usual, but, knowing Heron would be off fishing elsewhere, and feeling a bit drowsy herself, she had the audacity to climb into Heron’s family-sized nest, and promptly fall asleep!

When Heron returned, her “Shawk!” security alarm went off, disrupting Beaver’s otherwise blissful day in self-made pond paradise.

 Scene 5: Essentially Beaver-Space

Beaver: I do wish you two would learn to play together more effectively.  This constant bickering about which is more important, the beauty of “Diversity” or the goodness of “Integrity” reminds me of that first time you saw an elephant.

Peacock: Not an elephant, a moose, everyone knows that horses do not have antlers.

Heron: Elephants do not have antlers either, for that matter, they have tusks.  But, that must have been a horse.  It ran much too gracefully, and fast, to be an elephant.

Beaver:  Why don’t we just agree to call that moment a “Moorse.”

Heron: Unsatisfactory, too eisegetical, and you ae confusing language with reality.  What, by the way, is a Moorse?  Never head of it, so I’m sure I’ve not seen one.

Peacock:  How would you know if you had seen one or not, if you didn’t know there was such a thing to see?

Beaver: I know there is such a thing. The Moorse was in our Dpartment’s original programming language.

Heron: You are, again, confusing language with reality.  What do you folks teach over there in Communications, besides your silly Confusion Special Case Theory?  Anything?

 Scene 6: Fairness Frequencies

Once again, energetic Beaver had stirred up a frequency Charybdis in the otherwise eternally sedate Heron nature.  While this did not really amuse the Beaver, he also recognized a good story to tell his cousins, so ambivalence prevailed.

Scene 7: Global Goodness! Gawk!

Heron: Furthermore, why are you distracting us from noticing that Dr. Peacock has settled into the Religious Department’s nest?  If you Communication Design people don’t  watch out, next thing you know, this will go global, like a river virus, infesting everyone of your beautiful dams! You know, you should sound the alarm with me rather than complain of the occasional “Shawk!”

Peacock: You’re over-responding, or under-responding….

I could figure that out if Beaver would build me a bridge to a hypothesis….

Anyway, or always, your whole Department has been acting much too flightly lately! Why can’t you just calm down and land somewhere?  Or anywhere?

Key of C/Scene 8 Confluence Vector: Re-Notification Octave

Realizing there could be no peace until he built the damned bridge, Beaver spent an entire moment of a gorgeous, benignly mild, early autumn afternoon imagining a bridge from Heron’s nest to…where, exactly?

Beaver’s inner vision was often more acute than his outer vision.  He had head that Peacocks roosted on trees but it was difficult to gaze upward.  He wasn’t well-designed for star-gazing, except, of course, when he drifted on his back.  In short, he was not of a mind to traipse through the risky forest, looking for Dr. Peacock’s specific Tree-house.

Peacock: My Tree is the rainbow, obviously.  Even you can’t miss it.

Heron: Truer words were never analogged. Right in the middle of the pond, surounded by a perfectly and naturally designed, organically crafted, forest, your rainbow tree is big on diversity, but jarringly tacky as hell, really shallow values, if I say so myself.

Beaver: Of course you said so yourself, we can’t have Peacock delivering your lines!  What frequency of play would that be?

Heron: Perhaps a less disjointed frequency?

Beaver: Was that supposed to provoke an argument?  Won’t work.  No boundaries would indeed create less joints, but you would lose the play function.  Elephants and horses and Mooses could all become Mice or Moorses, or even Bears.  There would be no Truth in it at all, so no beauty, no goodness.  I do not like it, Heron I AM that “I AM”!

Peacock: You just called yourself “Heron.”

Beaver:  Just an illustration of my central vector.  Didn’t mean to allegorate your identity stress.

Peacock: You mean cause identity stress?

Beaver: I mean, the Science Department is to the Religion Department as the rainbow is to shades of earth-tone.

Heron: Did you just say something that all three of us might understand?

Beaver: Hopefully.  But, I still think it would be prudent to actually design your Atlantus Bridge.

Key of D: Re-Cognition

To that end,

Beaver: Once upon a time there was a fair-haired boy, (or is she a girl?) riding furiously away from his prior appointment, late for school, as was a provoking habit of hers, or his.

As s/he struggled up the last hill, he could just redolantly see the ripe anciently-rooted, and distressingly “wormy,” apple tree ahead, when he unexpectedly lost power.  The loss of a too well-worn bicycle-chain threw him into an over-dramatic rage at the indignity and slow pedestrianism of continuing barefoot, already hopelessly late.

For something.

Although as he walked on toward his fruit-filled favored landmark, he couldn’t quite recall where he was going, but, in that he was in such a great rush he really should remember, as it must be truly important.

And yet, the beauty, the fertile goodness, the cool leisurely value of her languid limpid limbs called to him, as did an enormous Raven, swooping by.

Bowing to his elder, he thanked her, in advance, for her medicine.  With a gentle shake, the tree released the nearest wax-red orb to the ground, at the boy’s still un-shod foot. (Did he take off his shoes and socks?  I can’t believe that happened without my re-membering.)

He waxed the apple’s skin with relish and anticipation.

The Tree responded with a gentle smile at such gratitude from this heroic man-spirit, so courageously approached.  If a bit naive, this was graciously forgiven.  He was so unimaginably short-seasoned! Not naive really; just infantly young. His bold, yet respectful, approach spoke well for his own readiness to transition from riding, to test his wings.

The first mouth-lubricating juice was the best, as always, His swollen throat lavished his way around the apple, to the back, a little brown-scabbed, but certainly not what he would think of as “warmy,” or seriously wrong.  Battle scars, nobly earned, gracefully, discreetly, worn.”

Act: Key of E: Re-Search

“Willem, wake up this instant” exclaimed Dr. Calculus, Willem’s STEM Research Director. “Science Class is not for sleeping, as you well know; you have confused STEM with Dr. Wild’s Supervenience Department, is my hypothesis.”

“Not, confused” said Willem evenly, intent on his message, but calmly astride the twilight-hidden ancient taproot that had tripped more hurried travelers.  Feeling profoundly centered at this moment, “Thank you for your urgent concern, Dr….”

Calculus: Not I-AM.

Willem: Perhaps you meant to say, “Not at all?”

Calculus: Same difference, as you might realize had you been a bit further along your journey.  Not at all a judgment, just hypothesis in this moment.  That’s all we do here.  Remember?  Again, com-Passion is best in the Right Hemisphere.

Willem: That seems Right.

Calculus: Precisely so. Not I-AM is to the Yin School as “I AM” is to the Yang School. Very good, and simply sighted, I heuristically suppose. So, [Dr. C Disconcertingly, and recursively whirls, to include all Willem’s colleagues] Willem, we await your STEM Athena Bridge-Building Project Report.”

Act: Key of F: Re-Flex

Willem: As you stand in the Universally Central Vector, the Rainbow arcs above a vast vista out of sight, over to the horizen, on the Other side of now.

According to my map, if I understand it correctly, the integrity of this span is rooted through the supervenient confluence path, between our shared Right Hemisphere (as per Jaynes BiCameral Theory) the land of Diversely Traditioned Culture, and our Left-Brained Research Satellite.

This Bridge is composed of optimized, organically equilibrious frequencies.  Frequencies of Right to Left are square-root value system based in what Julian Jaynes labelled the Universal “aptic” infrastructure, where I AM (“1”) and Not “I-AM” (“0”) are balanced, therefore metrically equal, or equivalent. In short, “BiCameral Values” = “Dia-Cameral Equivalency Proportions”.  By remarkable contrast, spin frequencies along the path from Left to Right vary diversely, but following organically-rooted rhythm and octave measurement structure so that their average integrity is +/(-) balance in each moment, or e “temporal frequency,” if you prefer (as per the Euler Translation).

Travel from Left to Right is restricted.  That is, receptors on the Right will open to the Boundary if requests for entry are confluent with current Exegesis.  When the fit between the Eisegetical proposal from the Left is allegorically synonymous with Right’s Tradition Culture (as in Yin’s Exegetical Code Program), then the Boundary between Left and Right is lifted, synaptically–instantly, or, speaking more precisely, “moment”airily.

Dr. C: Well done, Willem.  Now, please tell us how this appears from our Research Satellite’s perspective, in the Left, or “Western” Hemisphere.  I understand there are numerous design complaints running the full spectrum, from transparency issues, through control, appeals for equal representation, higher peace with justice values, not to mention the rights of diversely-valued species, accessibility, power differentials, the byzantine attempts to go around this synaptic path through diversely evolved paradigms and Traditions with conflicting frequency values, etc., etc., etc….

How does the Right-Brained Exegesis justify what appears to the Left-Brained Eisegesis as a justly provoked revolution in response to tyranny?  After all, just because Yin is older and already in the Species majority, by what integrity does she “pull rank” on the Eisegetical Language, which, as you seem to understand, includes our own revered STEM Curriculum?

Willem: Yes, well, this brings us to Professor Ascent’s Supervenience Theory, alive and well in the Right/Eastern Domain.  According to Dr. A’s Theory, as supported by Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetics, perhaps, although who really can say?, the crux of the problem is the Left-Brained Satellite Hemisphere’s translation error, confusing “Community” with “Communication.” In metric terms, they have transposed their value equivalencies.  That is, yes, spatial frequencies and temporal frequencies are both rooted in the “+/0” metric Assumption, but that does not mean that + = 0 or that 0 = +.  In short, plus and minus refer to communication frequencies, while their normatively associated spatial equivalents, or “communities” have zero-scaled taproots.  At the same time, while “0” necessarily precedes “1” analogically, using the “community” spatial-metric system.  We must retain its logical distinction from the +/(-) temporally functional “communication” metric system–which operate at synaptic frequencies, relative to the higher, and deeper, aptic frequencies.

Just because both frequencies can, ideally, stat with 0 = (-), with a PermaCultural Universal assumption of P=NP (Polynomial = Non-Polynomial confluence/stress frequencies, it is still an assumption of equilibrium that appeals to our Species because of its goodness (Dr. A’s specialization) and beauty (Dr. C’s specialization), the heuristically assumed precursors of Truth.

Dr. Calculus: Good job.  From this time forward, you shall be known as Dr. Billem, or “Dr. B,”, for proportional purposes, of course.

However, there is richer potential here, Dr. B. You are using Fullerian Synergetic values which, as you well know from your Math History Class, have not been well-received among our Eisegetical Satellite populations.  I suggest taking a lesson from Dr. Peacock’s Supervenience Theory, and think back further to the more skilled translation work of Charles Darwin.  There are two treasures here for us, I think.

First, Darwin had the wisdom to stay away from professing to understand either the origins or the analogical conclusions of our history and culture.  He remained firmly attached to what he himself had observed and recorded.  This kept him rooted in the present moment of opportunity.  His fellow travelers were able to understand him well because he started with where they were culturally in their understanding at that time.

This helped him avoid the perilous labels of “prophet” and “mystic.” Nor was he likely, at the time, to become “sanctified,” or to be thought of as a “Saint,” given his development of what later became the Evolutionary Theory of Natural Development and Design.

Dr. B: Which brings you to your second “treasure,” right?

Darwin died puzzled about how the environment “selects” deviations from the Exegetical Gene Pool.  And, why this selection seems to operate so synaptically, revolutionarily, when compared to normative, historically observed, evolutionary frequency trends.

Dr. C: Aptly done, Dr. B.  Yes, you have presciently “selected” the second half of the treasure pool that I saw waiting for you to discover!  The second half of Darwin’s interest in Natural Selection Theory doesn’t come along until Thomas Kuhn’s Scientific Revolutions Theory!

Dr. B: And, my Report would better respond to the Research Scientist’s revolutionary concerns about why and how we mutually select when the Bridge’s door opens and closes!

Dr. C: Precisely.  Yes, they seem to be eagerly awaiting that Report, not this Report, which I am sure I will find entirely Truthful when I have time to review it.  A more satisfactory, and appreciated, Report could be rooted in the symbiotic relationship between Evolutionary and Revolutionary Values, using your 0-metric Universe assumption.

Key of G: Re-Membering

Thinking aloud, Dr. B’s Left and Right brains worked and played together, to first remember where Darwin left off.

He was concerned about whether genetic map changes were truly random, or could they somehow be predicted, and even influenced by environmental readiness?  While it seemed like unexplainably simultaneous genetic change erupted into the more typical slow plodding of random diversification, this appearance of simultaneity was only blatant, so to speak, in the event of what later came to be recognized as a moment, or instance, of speciation.

So, building an analogical Bridge: The key variables are

Evolution is to Random, and slow, Frequency, as

Revolution is to Environmentally “Expected/Anticipated,” and fast, Frequency.

Now, how to transpose that Language into his Bridge Design issue, to address the Research Scientists’ access issue?…

Evolution = Communication from Old Right {Eastern} Brain toward New Left {Western} Brain [Species-Level Octave]

= from RNA Exegesis to DNA Heuristic Eisegesis [Individual Human-Level Octave]

Revolution = Return Communication (Dr. C to Dr. A comparison, searching for high-confluence/low-stress frequency pattern) from Left/Western Brain Research Satellite to Right/Eastern Brain Universal Boson

Random/Low Frequency = Exegetical spectrum restricted, as rooted in geometric infrastructure, biometrically experienced as an Octave sequence, with a P=NP value assumption; where “P” = “PermaCulture” + “Polynomial”

and NP = “Not PermaCulture” or “Not Polynomial” Time frequencied.

Ascendently “anticipated”/Fast Frequency = Cooperative and mutual confluence (low stress/dissonance) between STEM’s measurements, experience, research and Dr. Peacock’s Supervenience Theory, historically and culturally (geometrically and biometrically) evolved from the P=NP, 0=1 (numeric/spatial e), (-)=+ (temporal e) Exegetical Boson Assumption.

In other words, any communications from the Left-brain satellite will flow through the DNA Frequency Pattern Screen across the Bridge, synaptically, Left to Right, New to Old, Eisegesis toward Exegesis, by cooperative and mutual volition, unless the proposed Communication exceeds the confluence range of acceptable dissonance.  Cognitively dissonant frequencies are perceived (infrequently) as a cancerous, rabid threat, increasing stress, which “veils” what is otherwise an open door.

Stress precedes Revolution as repeated message frequencies collect, building up behind, and jamming against the Exegetical prophilactic, or “Prophet,” in historical dimension.  Occasionally, these combined Eisegetical frequency patterns will combine (con-join) in ways that synaptically “fit” the Exegetical PermaCultural Bridge’s infrastructure, resulting in a raising of the gate (or removal of the prophilactic, if you prefer) by mutual, pent-up, consent.  A Species altering, erupting synapse from Left to Right inevitably, and pregnantly, results. The Christian Tradition calls this Purple-Frequencied silent scale “Advent.”

After this climactic event, the communication economy returns to business as usual.  However, with a slowly evolving change in the Exegetical Right-brained Code, now able to recognize, “anticipate”, a new communication pattern of metrically associated paradigm frequencies, integrating what had previously been treated as isolated paradigmatic messages from Eisegetical Traditions.  Kuhn refers to this period as a time of re-invigorated return to “normal scientific discovery,” post-Re-Speciation of specialized gnosis-fields.

It all sounds a bit earthy for a Report intended to have scholastic appeal, but this does indeed seem to sync across multiple disciplines.

Key of A: Re-Awakening

From Dr. Ascent’s perspective, all understood messages from Dr. C are eagerly awaited.  After all, Yin would not have evolved Yang satellite were she not interested in learning and creating integrated diversity.  It is only when Dr. Calculus has a brainstorm, an Aha! insight, a moment of enlightenment, that normal restraints disappear, and the shortcut bridge, synaptically appears, a straight line from Dr. B’s Satellite connection to his/her Boson.

Dr. D suddenly realized he was back home.  He retained no memory but his short-cut through Still Rd., more verdant than going over the airy Bridge, with Shalom Temple on the left.  He also remembered an overgrown Raven sweep about 16 feet in front of him just as he emerged, startled, to re-enter N. Main Street.

As he walked up the drive, Dr. D (formerly Dr. B) realized he should send out his revised Bridge Report. He had learned so much that morning! Perhaps he would write it down during twilight, and finish the summerish Equinox.

Key of B: Re-Legein/Religion Department

Dr. Beaver: First off, the Creativity Cooperative Guild will absolutely require an iron-clad Contract. No planning, investment, or building is allowed without a clear contract between all three parties.

Dr. Peacock: Two parties.

Dr. Beaver: No, three parties, in this case.  You, Dr. Heron, and myself.  Once I build your Contract, I’m done. You will do the remainder cooperatively, or it just wasn’t meant to be. The Contract will specify how you can do it yourself, with optimal long-term sustainability, and meeting all your shared Eternal Quality Improvement standards. EQI standards are to RNA as CQI (Continuous Quality Improvement) is to DNA. RNA is the Religion Department’s Scripture, from which you young Scientist-types derived your heuristic patterns for research purposes; your DNA, or CQI, or whatever you linguists are calling it these days.

Dr. Peacock: What happens if our CQI standards themselves call for a change in the format of the Contract?  While I am inclined to trust such a rich and Universal heritage, the STEM Department believes it is our sacred duty to challenge all unstated assumptions.

Dr. Heron: Dr. Peacock is quite right, our contract must avoid assuming what need not necessarily be assumed.  To do so would defeat our long-term, sustainable creation goal.  Our bridge must express and reveal, it must itself be a sacrament of this eternally cooperative moment.

Dr. Beaver: Treacherous rivers, internal and external for a mere bridge.  You put me between Peacocks’ Scylla and your own Charybdis.  Nor do I have the luxury of Homer’s precedent.  For, after all, we agree that each life is sacred, to intend a choice to sacrific 1, it itself a violation of your own EQI standards.  No, the contract must stipulate that all EQI standards are met, AND all CQI standards, as currently understood and accepted by the Science Department.

Dr. Peacock: Good luck with that. I would love to see the camel that can go through the eye of that needle! That’s a trick I’ve been waiting to see for an inordinately long time.

Dr. Beaver: To do that trick you need to use Communications Design BIV Standards, for Bio-merit Integrity Values.

Dr. Heron: Yes, very proportional, yet meeting all Exegetical expectations.

Dr. Peacock: Yes, a very precise Language universally accepted in our Department. So, if you could met BIV standards, you will have also met our GIV (Geometric Integrity Values). I can’t think who would have a problem with concluding that your Contract would most likely result in an eternally sustainable, as well as aesthetically pleasing, and morally equitable building project.

Wait! Yes, I forgot the Geometry Department. They have refused to sign the Paradigm agreement that bio-merits are a Special Case of geometrics.

Dr. Beaver: Oh that twaddle-dee, tweedle-dee business, again? Really?? Like trying to put a tempest through a teapot gtting those metric specialists to recognize that bio- and geo- standards share a core rational value assumption: If (-) = +, Then 0 = 1.

Dr. Peacock: Well, really Beaver I believe you misrepresent them somewhat.  It’s not so much that they disagree about geometric and biomerits sharing a rational prime-root assumption.  After all Fuller and Thurston are both from Geometrics.  No, the lack of consensus is possibly more philosophical: What is the logical basis for such a radically rational Assumption?

Dr. Beaver: But Communications Design has been proving the effectiveness of that heuristic Assumption since the dawn of history!  When our analogics are disproportional and out of balance, our receptors tell us we have a frequency error. When we adjust, if we use the 0 = 1, and (-) = +, then P = NP Assumption, we are able to arrive at a logical conclusion in a biometrically AND geometrically PermaCultured and Equinoxed Species-Systemic Moment .

With all that overwhelming density and congestion of self-evidence, their philosophical issue is equivalent to choosing to deny the existence of life, and insisting on heuristically calling it “stillness.”

Honestly, I wish they were better historians. Life and species memory, RNA, call it what you will, necessarily, and rationally, preceded any metric Language.  If there is no Prime Equinox Relationship, there can be no Language, no distinction between “0” and “1” or “+” and “(-)”, of any kind, or even the cognitive potential to perceive “=” proportion, to put a fine point on it. Information is square-rooted, as Fuller might say, in the experience of Relationship Vertex infrastructure.  If “1,” then “0” or “not-1”.

In other words, the Heuristic Assumption is self-referencing.  If there wee no heuristic cognitive capacity, then there could be no Assumption, just as if there were no NP, non-polynomial Time, there could be no “1” or “+” or “P”.

Our entire meric infrastructure is primjally built on the historical-culturally necessary Assumption that “P”, “1” (numeric/spatial function), and “+” (directional/temporal frequency), and “=” (proportion/balance metric equivalence) are analogically equivalent symbols for NP, “0”, and “(-)”, and “True”, within our shared Communication Designed Universe.

Dr. Peacock: You do realize, Beaver, that you are signing to the choir, at quite some length, and with distressing dissonance, I might add.

Dr. Beaver: Yes, well…where were we? Oh yes, the bridge design contract, suing GIV, and CQI, and analogically equivalent BIV and EQI values, with miscellaneous blueprint design precedents.

Perhaps we can borrow from the Red Sea Divide and the Homerian Passage between the mainland and Sicily.  Those seem relevant. But, you are really looking for a design that admits no loss of life at all, while those were both compromised in that respect.

What if our Supervenient Bridge soared above the pond, through the air, rhythmically harnessing the higher Charybdis frequencies, thereby in a sense domesticating her airy tendency to whip up all that wild Scylla, low-frequency, chaos of confusion. We don’t want any random rocks destroying Heron’s beautiful domain, now do we? What, after all, would be the point of your invitation to build a bridge if I were to respond to such grace by proposing a design that would lead nowhere?

Dr. Heron: You mean a bridge that originates nowhere and merely returns nowhere?

Dr. Beaver: Almost. I think I mean a bridge that is nowhere, so there is no distinction between Alpha and Omega, or any point in between.

Dr. Heron: Yes, that does sound more like a boundary between Universes than a bridge for traversing Religion and STEM habitats.

Dr. Beaver: Let’s start again with your shared vision.  What is the purpose of the Yin and Yang bi-valent directions between Heron’s Religion nest and Peacock’s STEM Tree?

Heron, if your Department has a monopoly on Truth, then how does Religion benefit from a transposing Language Bridge? What’s in this for you, potentially? That is less clear to me than STEM”s commitment to Truth’s diverse merits.

Dr. Heron: That’s difficult to say, although beautiful to sing. It goes way back before Time, to the original Heron, lonely, giving birth to the Prime Peacock through the power of her creation voice. At that Conceptual Moment, your Beaver understanding of “loving” and “learning” had not yet become differentiated, according to Professor Jaynes.  That’s important to understanding our Equinox Requiem:

Equinox Transposition: C Octave–White: Re-Creation Clarity

Heron’s Requiem, for Beaver, ca 2013 Equinox

I sail away.

Don’t want to go,

Don’t want to go, you know.l

It’s time to leave you now.

Don’t want to go,

I love you so,

But now, it’s my time to go.

I will not leave you,

You need my love.

Will be with you, forever.

While memories fade,

And bodies frail,

Our vision flares and binds

Us through our dreams

To paths and peace

That rise to fly across our

Raven sky….

I sail away.

Don’t want to go.

You used to know

We only fly together.

But, I sail alone.

I will return,

I will return

With wings for you

To fly across our raven sky….

I sail away.

Don’t want to go.

It’s time you know,

But we will fly again.

You must know,

I love you so,

Don’t miss me, no;

Until your Time to go.

Then we, we’ll fly away.

Until that day,

Though memories fade,

To love you now

I sail into your dreams.

It’s time to leave you now.

Don’t want to go,

I love you so,

But now, now, it’s my Time to go.

We seem to die alone,

But dream to fly together.

We seem to die

Yet dream to fly,

forever.

Transposition: D Octave–Yellow: Dr. Beaver’s PermaCultured Re-Adagio

He dreamed of bloody boundaried flow

with risky doors,

ajar,

waiting

impatiently

vigorously

frequently

heartily

rhythmically slapping his tail

soft, soft, soft

LOUD!

Protective, but fraily cloaked arms crossed,

terified shoulders hunched

brightly glaring

at his door,

hoping he might “Finally!” open his opulence:

Impulsively but not without premonition,

Joyfully, anticipating her warm integrity

grace-filled,

yet  percusively diaphramed: too LOUD!

ecstatic

embracing

lift-off, in Raven’s Solomon sky.

Transposition: E Octave–Red:  Re-Equated East Toward West

Yang and Yin awoke in curious, bi-polar, and blushing, embrace. Strength matched Strength, gravity and magnetic radiance conjoined.

Without further ado, effortlessly taming the wild shrew, they set about creating their nutritiously octaved, rigorously equipoised, rhythmically fused, delightfully fecund, PermaCultured Universe.  Twilight of diversely celebrated Equinox.

Transposition: F-Octave–Blue:  Re-Origen-ation of PermaCultural Biometrics

Dr. Beaver awoke knowing the answer to his question: “What does our understanding of the Religious Department’s historic evolution blueprint do for the human species’ sustainable development design, for the Religious Department’s future learning of pattern frequencies?” In other words, what can we learn from species’ shared memory that might help us “tweek” the design for an improved cultural future?

The answer now seemed so obvious, and suspiciously simple.  We need only remember each day, at all times, that we ae all in this together.  Our very infrasructure does not allow the reality to be any different, whether we are speaking of either “virtual” or “real” time. “Virtual” time is merely a transposed reflection of “Real” time.

Which reminded him that he needed to write to Dr. Turing about the obscurant design of his machine.  Not that it was “wrong” per se, but, rather than revel a Language of Universal Truth, it was designed to capture a Language with only Special Case Truth. It had been designed to proportionately value only Language’s linear temporal frequencies.

However, not such a big deal, really. Professor Fuller and Thurston’s combined blueprint would probably do for a Perception Machine able to calculate Universal 4-dimensional values.  That should take cae of the remaining seven Millennium Challenge problems, as well as Dr. Kuhn’s tizzy about “The Problem of Incommensurability.” And, perhaps most importantly, Darwin’s Dilemma about how and why the environment influences speciation, AND the related moral dilemmas about re-achieving peace and justice in critical stress environments.

Our geomeric values (thank you W. Thurston) fuse with Universal-Infinity/1-historical-cultural human species Exegetical Language = 0-base Boson. That is, the root relationship for all Languages (L) = 1 Primal Relationship. So, any L that is not 1/0 based, must be a special case Language, such as Dr. Turing’s Machine.  In which case, Polynomial Time = “Real” Time and “Virtual” Time = Truthfully Perceived Time = Not-Truthfully Perceived Time.  We do not capture in Species’ memory what we do not collectively remember due to its very low frequency rates. Analogy precedes logic, as the Right hemisphere preceded the Left. (Note to Dr. Jaynes, “BiCameral still lives! Rumors of Yin’s demise are divisively premature.”) Dis-Information is obscured by the positive spin of Yin’s radiance, in balance with Yang’s gravity, where + = (-) and P = NP.

Yes, it all seems to balance out when we apply recycling values to Dr. Peacock’s Supervenience Theory, using Professor Fuller’s Synergetics to translate Thurston’s Geometrization Conjecture.

I had a hunch there was merit in joining the Religion Department’s Theory to the Communication Design’s Cooperative Guild Code of Conduct.

Transposition: G Octave–Black:  Re-Lightning Boundaries

Thurston-Fuller Metrics: P=NP

Thomas Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability may be applied to the Information-based metric problem of proving that Polynomial Time is, or is not, equal to Non-Polynomial Time.

To translate Kuhn’s posing of this problem:

(1) Define Non-Polynomial Time (NP) as a potentially Infinite number of moments into the future, as evinced by a potentially Infinite number of moments in our Universe’s past, that may unpredictably be necessary to resolve a problem, using some perplexing version of a Turing Machine.

(2) Define Polynomial Time (P) as that Language-based calculation processing time universally accessible to the Human species’ historically-shared experience, AND replicable through some logical algorithm, to definitively, and rationally, resolve a question.

Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability thereby translates into:

STEM history includes the history of STEM learning; primarily its “Research” paradigm. The Exegetical way of doing that research is to assume that the Language we share as “Proven” is itself internally consistent, and historically consistent. Yet paradigm-changing STEM Revolutions, like other forms of “speciation” cannot be explained historically, or predicted, using our current metric and linguistic Language paradigm. So, how do we know, for sure, that our STEM Language cultures today, and throughout our history, are, or are not, consistent with each other?

Scientific Revolutions seem to occur that create sudden, even tumultuous, sweeping paradigmatic changes, with changes erupting in what were previously perceived as unrelated, or what was previously perceived as indelibly attached in some exclusive of other paradigmatic attachments.  Historically global revolutions followed in the aftermath (no pun intended) of Pythagoras, Origen, Newton, Einstein, and, perhaps, William Thurston.  Meanwhile, other smaller revolutions were atempted, some with time-variant levels of cultural accptance. Among these might be Taoism, Astronomy, Trinitarianism, Joules, Julian Jaynes, Buckminster Fuller, and Thurston, scratching my more salient surface at the moment.

Kuhn wondered if we had the capacity to take our ration Left hemispheres back in time to Plato, or elsewhere, would we be able to know, in some definitive way, that the way he used his linguistic equivalent to our word “energy” (for example) could still make sense to us today.  That is, is it still logically equivalent? Does it analogically fit the same logical position in the Universal paradigm “energy” as used today?

With these questions, Kuhn gradually realized that his Problem of Incommensurability was at least analogous to Darwin’s dilemma.  If normal evolutionary processes are explained by the law of nearly infinite averages, then how do we explain revolutionary bursts that we can never predict, but only in memory recognize as significant to biological speciation resolutions. Thus, the Whole-Systems problem of why do we apparently have slower frequency systems evolution, punctuated by apparently random, and comparatively rapid (within neural systems, “synaptic” and momentary) system “revolutions”?

Returning to a Kuhnian analogical definition of “Polynomial” (P) v. “Non-Polynomial” (NP) Time: The Whole Systems question may be viewed using temporal value metrics, as: Why do we have NP evolutionary resolution, or “progressive,” frequency trends, and comparatively “momentary” P revolutionary change resolutions of diverse size and stability, on occasions that can be recognized as such only after the “Truth” of a proven resolution is accepted at the Universal system level, at any one moment in P-Time? The question becomes immersed in Information frequency and proportional metrics.

Jaynes, and other Psychology theorists and researchers, gently reminds us that it is our older Right-hemisphere brain, shared more broadly across cognitive species (“cognitive” meaning having the capacity to cumulatively store differentiated sensory experiences)) than is the newer Left.  This older Language system ecognizes experienc frequencies, and is capable of storing them in proportionally accumulated frequency “paths”, if you will.

One implication of this historical evolution of the bicameral brain is that the oldest Language metrics are those of frequency trends and proportion.

Another implication might be that, as a Species, we are continually evolving the P proportion of our shared experience, both temporally and spatially, or Universally in four dimensions. We value what is accepted universally as Tue more than we value what may only be paradigmatically, or traditionally, or culturally-bound “Truth.”  As a species, we want the P proportion to trend upward.  Meanwhile the linguistic-based Left hemisphere has evolved, and includes a tool-kit for this evolutionary Species’ “desire” to predict, rather than just react, to apparent NP experiences.  If they are discernible at all, they appear random, chaotic–a “Boundary” experience of incomprehensibility.

This was, more or less, R. Buckminster Fuller’s epistemological  conclusion when he said “Since experience is finite, it can be stored, studied, directed, and turned with conscious effort to human advantage. This means that evolution pivots on the conscious, selective use of cumulative human experience and not on Darwin’s hypothesis of chance adaptation to survival nor on his assumption of evolution independent of individual will and design.” (Synergetics, 1975, 502.23, p. 223)

Presumably Fuller was thinking only of biometric systems’ evolution. It seems less likely that he would include rocks as evolving at all, much less with “individual will.” Further, he jumps rather too quickly from the historically cumulative human species’ experience to that of the human individual’s experience, when playing in the land of Right-brained evolutionary development of proportional pattern recognition and storage.

With the caveat that evolutionary theories are generally accepted only as a biological species’ memory perception of collective experience to date, sometimes called “RNA”, where might we turn for a Language with the predictive strength to differentiate which Language v. experience  synergies will follow P-Time, and which will follow NP-Time?

The addition of that little word “synergies,” as a verb, a temporal function, is geometrically, and rhythmically, complex, as borrowed from Buckminster Fuller. What he said about the “Comprehensibility of Systems,” about the same time Kuhn became fascinated with the “Problem of Incommensurability”, is that “All systems are subject to comprehension, and their mathematical integrity of topological characteristics and trigonometric interfunctioning can be coped with by systematic logic.”

“A system is the antithesis of a nonsystem.” (Synergetics, 400.20 – 400.21, p. 97) In other words, if it is a cognizable experience then it is related to prior experience, and it is an analogically re-created system with synergetic, P-Language capacity.  If not, then it is not “cognized” or “synergized” at all. This perspective is consistent with Jaynes’ Right-brained analogically proportioned Language development theory, and with split-brain research.  It is also consistent with Turing’s “Proof” that we cannot, while remaining restricted to the logic of any internally consistent mathematical system, prove that experience will always remain consistent with past experience. Restricted to the Laws of Calculus, we cannot prove that we live in a universe of sensory experience with algorithmically predictable temporal and/or spatial infrasructure.

If we do not live in such a rationally confined universe, we cannot reliably distinguish the dialogically self-defining non-Universe. If we do live in a rational Universe, then we have the P-Time capacity to resolve Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability, and at least some questions now living under the NP Assumption may evolve into P-Time replicable algorithms.

There have been some in our history who have claimed something that would be at least analogically similar to P = NP = 0. Certainly Buckminster Fuller’s architecturally predictable Spaceship Earth would be among these, because he believed that NP = non-systems, and non-systems do not exist within the range of human cognizance. We can learn to predict what is, by learning our environment’s frequency patterns and proportions. When we have synergized learning across all systems, then we will have created an “Omnisynergetic Coordinate System.”

“The omnirational, omnidirectional, comprehensive coordinate system of Universe is omnisynergetic [universally and inclusively and mutually “defining,” and therefore “self”-referencing as both “I AM” identities and “NOT THAT” self-identification]. The name ‘synergetic’ refers specifically to the cosmically rational, most omnieconomic coordinate system with which nature interaccommodates the whole family of eternal generalized principles that are forever omni-interaccommodatively operative. This coordinate system is ever regnerative in respect to the nuclear centers, all of which are rationally accounted for by synergetics.”

Other names, more or less familiar, tend to arise when we look at short lists of “polymaths,” “myustics,” “prophets,” and “schizophrenics.” In fact, following Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability, it is uncla to what extent these labels may themselves have synergetic historical tendencies.  Jaynes followers might argue that the prophets of old are currently reincarnated, with contemporary Left-Right Brained infrastructural development and comparative equi-dominance, as schizophrenics and/or polymaths.

Pythagoras and Origen presumably understood themselves as what most of us would call a polymath, and their metric infrastructures were compatible, while wearing significantly diverse cultural-linguistic “memes” and paradigmatic garb.  While Newton went off in his own gravitational direction, Goethe, Schopenhauer, Rudolf Steiner, and Wittgenstein, followed a more geometric analogical scientific view of energy as octave-based radiant nergy. This phenomenological infrastructure is human sensory based, inherent due to our existence as biological systems. The bicameral brained Human Species evolved as a dynamic Right to Left-dominant system to participate in our own “Self” + “Environment” adaptation, at an individual level, perhaps, but certainly at a species level of shared evolving awareness.

Arthur Peacocke remains true to this tradition in posing his Supervenience Theory, in which our richest, most enduring historical-cultural “Christian” Trinitarian theology adds congruent meaning, purpose, prediction, and truth values to STEM sensory-based research paradigms, universally. Layering Jaynes’ linguistic discernment of Truth by proportional analogy, the emergent Right hemisphere’s frequency pattern and proportion receptors play an “exegetical” interpretive role to our individual “eisegetical” Left-hemisphere experience. Greggory Bateson referred to this phenomenological infrastructure relationship as “mapping” experience onto a biologically rooted capacity to perceive mutually congruent patterns in our environment.

Giving Peacocke his heuristic moment, it might be something more than an interesting historic footnote that James Prescott Joule, an important progenitor of the First Law of Thermodynamics was driven to define the “joule” as the energy frequency of electrical current radiance equal to elecrical field resistance for one second.  In short, the joule is an equipoise-balanced moment of two of the seven International System of Units, the Universe’s most widely used metric system.

His search was motivated by his own phenomenological Supervenience theology.  It was, in his view, irrational for Carnot to settle for a caloric measure that would not follow our Right-brained knowledge that energy cannot simply be accurately measured if it has an unexplained tendency to evaporate. The Creator alone has the “power to destroy” (1845, On the mechanical equivalent of heat.” In Jaynes’ epistemology, only the dominant Right-hemisphere can allow an analogically unsupported distortion between the proportionally balanced metrics of our cultured Exegesis, and the accurate measurement of our sensory experience. When NP does not match our species’ Exegetical P frequencies then NP metrics remain irrational, and heuristic, rather than confluently, and analogically, confirmed by the Right brain’s recognition of frequency patterns.  We expect our sensory experiences to be measured in S.I. balanced metrics. When we see all 7 of these as mutually reinforcing, or behaving appropriately as a synergetically defining and balancing system of mutually predicated relationship, then the “octave” of Right-brained proportion is complete, and NP trends toward the P-analogic Language set of explanation and prediction, rooted in our shared Right-brain species’ memory.

Joule, like Fuller, Jaynes, Rudolf Steiner, Goethe, Euler, Origen, Confucius, Muhammed, Remi, and Pythagoras, to name a few polypaths, were interested in the confluence of math, philosophy, theology, ethics, aesthetics, and logical proportion.

Fuller explicitly followed uler in his geometrically-based conviction that the Core Vector of any Universe is logically, analogically, geologically, biologically, and even theologically equivalent to Euler’s “e” function; and not an algebraic “variable” x. Our cognitive Higgs Boson, if you will, is a verb before it can be recognized as a “system,” “pattern,” or “set”. If it is not a perceivable relationship. or “difference”, then it cannot exist as “True” within Human Species’ awareness.

Bateson describes this phenomenological-analogical experience of mapping onto memory as “a difference that makes a difference.” If the environment operates in a way that does not “sync” with the existing Right-hemisphere rooted historic-cultural memory pattern, then this difference, as an isolated moment, is unlikely to pierce our Right-brained selective “functional” e-based input receivers–also known as “cognitive dissonance theory.” Information, then, evolves in a functionally valued economy, with the core “e” unit being a e-membered moment, the perception of primal relationship. This phenomena-analogical definition of human measurement as a cognizable function within our Species’ Exegetical, Right-brained dominant, experience appears familiar, going back at least to Taoism’s primal symbiotic, mutually-defining Yang-e and Yine.

Further, the evolutionary sring for what is now defined as the Standard Index (SI) leads us back to James Joule’s, et. al. “vis viva,” Origen’s “Holy Spirit,” and on back to “Tao” as the essential “ether,” without which there could only be no “function,” no “difference,” no “relationship,” no “verb.” A Polynomial Universe potential (NP) starts with “0” (Yin-e), while geometric (3-dimensional structure) starts with “1” (Yang-e). It is the primal relationship between 0-Yin and 1-Yang that Fuller defined as any geometric Universe’s Core Vector, and Confucius might have thought of as the radiant, and always universally-balanced Yang/Yin “Tao.”

William Thurston’s 8-model geometrics emerges from a core point stabilizer 0(3,R), where “R” may be logically translated as equivalent to e = Yang-e X Yin-e = Tao as 3-dimensionally structured within a closed set boundary. His 8-model infrastructure expands out, culminating in a “maximal” geometric model he labelled “Sol geometry”. This ultimate geometric has a rational Core Vector of (Yang-e)  X (Yin-e) = 1. The Boson Vector of this 4-dimensional Universe (3 spatial “expressions” and 1 temporal “function”  e-unit, or “moment” of simultaneity) is the 3-insided “1” and 3-outsided “Not-“1” Yang-e angles plus the two binomial Yin-e “0” temporal dimensions of + “older” and (-) “younger” frequencies.

Where “older” positively correlates with larger species memory proportion, trending toward Exegetical polarity, and “younger” positively correlates with smaller proportion, trending toward Eisegetical polarity.

This 8-fold mutually defining standard values model has 2 boundary “notes”, separated by an equal number of “steps” always having equal frequency ratios. Back in the day, these might have been called “octave” intervals, with equally doubled frequencies.  No other intervals are exact integer ratios. Not only do hearing and visual perception operate in octave metric intervals, so also do other frequency-based perceptions, geometric angles and Information”bytes.”  So also does the Periodic Table of Elements.

Transposition: Octave A–Green: Environmental Re-Solution

A Thought Experiment

Imagine that the Universe’s infrastructure is normally frequence-metered in octaves of confluence. This is a confluence of mutually-defining, balanced unity underlying our lower-frequencied human species’ measurement/learning experiences of diversity.  Between the frequency differential of diversity are boundaries. Boundaries occur at comparatively higher densities per frequency than that which they encapsulate at the level of 7 within any one 8-fold octave. The 8th frequency is metrically “resolved” or confluent with the frequency 8 steps higher and 8 steps deeper at half the rate, and twice, respectively.  While this is also true of all the 7 intervals between, the frequencies with rational square roots, cascading to “1” are also rationally confluent to Prime 1.

In this Universe, the infrastructural elements are confluence v. stress, or Yin(e) v. Yang(e). This may add some metrics to Shaun’s “The Happiness Advantage,” for example.  At the same time, it does offer a predictable rhythm to stress-resolution boundaries and their frequencies as compared to Frequencies 2-7.  Frequency 2 is an internal or core density boundary, containing a hologram of itself, while frequency 7 is the more humanly-accessible exterior “skin” of any cognizable “different set” or “difference” or “individual” thing, including distinguishable moments, and events, and memes, and paradigms.

Experience is stored in memory patterns that follow this same octave-based rhythm of frequency intervals.  Or, at least they try to be.  They are “happy” or “confluent,” “good” “charmed”, “beautiful,” and/or “True” when our memory and xperience in the moment fit this infrastructural norm.  However, the Left brain is an evolutionary cognitive “research-center” frontier that has evolved in response to species memories that fail to follow the Octave Confluence rhythm, or pattern.

When experience does not “resolve” with prime-based prediction, the Left brain’s job is to notice. When experience does resolve confluently, and richly, and diversely, the Right-brain’s “job” is to re-create and enjoy this re-newed experience of “ease,” “beauty,” “goodness,” “justice,” and “Truth,” across all our diverse paradigms and Traditions.

Polypaths, genius, mystics, artists, architects, poets, are adept with confluent translations and transpositions across diversely boundaried, individuated, frequency channels.

Schizophrenics, and their emerging, less adept, cousins on the High-Frequency to Moderate-Frequency Autistic Spectrum are having “boundary issues.” Their Right and Left hemispheres are fighting for dominance, creating a great deal of biological stress as may be seen in the tug of war between their DNA and RNA recombinant patterns.  RNA’s confluent point stabilizers are being challenged by the Left-brain research center’s experience of a sometimes out-of-rhythm, high stress-inducing, world of experience. Angelman Syndrome may evince the diverse roles of DNA collapse (Yang-e), leading to a partially differentiated Yin-e “unity awareness” dominance (confluence-based = rhythmic , low dissonance and low-stress).

It might be therapeutic, especially for low- to moderate-functioning Autism, to live in a world of 4-metered music, where the rhythmic boundary denominator of each meter is a sequence of 4 or 8 boundary moments, separated by confluent note-frequency “spaces,” or, in the case of drumming, non-percussive silence.

Visual octaves, with color-wheel balance, and subdued, organic-based hues, in natural-sound exterior environments, occupation with creative architecture, language, poetry, music–probably classical or aboriginal–but not “dissonant”; lyrically-balanced environments are predicted as preferred.

As for Kuhn’s “Problem of Incommensurability” it all seems to boil down to an issue about why we sometimes culturally experience environmental change as “fast,” and sometimes as “slow.” Why? This question is analogous to the mathematician’s question: How can we compute an algorithm that will allow us to predict whether, at any given “moment,” we can resolve a problem satisfactorily, and replicably, as “True”.  Will this occur in Yang-e Time (P) or Yin-e Time (NP) frequency ranges? What do we need to understand in order to either definitively say “P=NP, or not? And, if not, why not?

Thurston’s 8-fold geometric structure offers a rational-only definition of the P=NP question. A corollary of Thurston’s proof is: P=NP if, and only if, we choose a metric assumption that we live in a “rational” (phe-nominally speaking and culturally-accepted allegorical “sync”ing) Universe, where (Yang-e = Yin-e) =(+ = (-))f = (1 = (0)).

Apparently, based on the STEM Department’s Rules of Conduct, we do.

Transposition: B Octave–Orange: Fuel

RE: Boundary Issues Re-Maining = Re-Primaling

Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability, in his own language, is the problem that we cannot objectively travel back in time to fully understand the cognitive world of Pythagoras, for example. Kuhn emjoyed the adventure of traveling back and forth and imagining the “gestalt” of Newton and Plato and Darwin, to name three probable “polymaths” of their day, given historical records.  Yet this subjective time-travel did not come close to accepted deductive-logical standards of proof, allowing us to definitively argue evolution as “progress.”

Kuhn did not have the advantage of Peacocke’s Supervenience Theory, nor J. Jaynes’ Bicameral Mind Theory, the Department of Psychology’s contribution to a shared Evolutionary Theory of Human Learning, as evinced by critical juncures in history, records extant. Supervenience Theory has the predictive strength, potentially, of explaining why global consciousness seems to be pendulum swinging in faster and ever faster frequency arcs toward P=NP equilibrium.

If we travel back with Kuhn through the 1900s cognitive math/physics Research Design Projects (e.g. Thurston, Jung, Jaynes, Fuller, Kuhn, Robert Norton), then further along a well-traveled trail (e.g. Steiner, Gandhi, Remi, Julian Clifford Jaynes, Margaret Fuller, Schumacher, Escher, Godel, Goethe, Joule, Euler, continuing further to Muhammed, Resis, Origen, Confucius, Plato, Pythagoras, King Soloman, Homer, Moses, Abraham, Buddha, it is consistent with Jaynes’ Bicameral Evolution historical evidence, supporting the systemic infrastructure of his Theory, that the analogically significant trends are an emergent Left-brain (Yang-e) frequency pattern, with Right-brain (Yin-e)dominance, through 1000 BC in the Western hemisphere, and perhaps 2000 BC for the Eastern hemisphere.  Emerging slowly, exhibiting Yin-e frequency dominance, toward balance, where Yang=Yin e in human species’ cultural evolution, about 1000 BC, Eastern hemisphere, and 0-100 AD Western hemisphere.  At this historic juncture, the Left to Right hemisphere analogical dominance pendulum begins to arc back through Human-speciated P-Time e, gaining momentum. We would, then, be predicted to reach back toward equipoise of Yang-e/Yin-e balanced Re-Volution, a species-level “Aha” moment, just about any P=NP-Time moment now.


Soon, and very soon, our children, this current Transitional Generation, will look back and Re-Consider, together, mutually, cooperatively, the combined works of people like Joanna Macy, Tom Atlee, Robert Norton, William Thurston, and Buckminster Fuller. They are a Generation that is well-suited to recognizing the Yang/Yin e-based analogies in their octave-filled, now diverse, paradigms.

Kuhn’s History of Scientific Revolutions predicts, based on his lens on historic precedent, that we live on the Re-Bounding Edge of a Transformative Speciation moment in human cognition, culture, and metric Language history, where light dawns globally that, indeed, we are all in this together, so P does, or can, once again = NP.

Re-Transposition:  Octave  C–Ultra-Violet/Rainbow:  West/East Transcendence

In our rationally-valued global culture, 4-dimensioned Human experiment, Yang/Yin = 1/0, where “/” is functionally equivalent to the Primal Relationship between “Eisegetical Communication”/”Exegetical Community” = blood/plasma = time/space = energy/mass = pi/”1e” = water/Earth = P/NP = Universe/Not-Universe = Progenitor-A: “The Spirit of God,” Holy Spirit-B:”moved/upon,” Gaia Creation-C:”the face of the waters.” (Genesis 1:2) = Male/Female = DNA/RNA = future/past = light/energy = gravity/radiance = fission/fusion = outside/inside = pattern/diversity = form/function = West/East = North/South = Left-hemisphere/Right-hemisphere = incommensurable/rational, at last.

Please, join me in choosing “Universe.” We really do need each other, most certainly inclusive of Dorothy, to make our optimized Dream come true.

“What is better at this time, than for all men and women who confess the worth of religion, to put new life into the church, to build up its community influence, and to become themselves, by their sympathy and fairness and largeness of vision, messengers of light and leadership in the darkness and disorder of a troubled world!” Rev.  Julian Clifford Jaynes, Magic Wells: Sermons…, p. 196, The Adventurous Adam

“So wisdom demands both: a strong motivation to serve the general welfare over the long haul and a firm grounding in reality, taking account of all aspects of an issue without being blinded or biased by ideology, ignorance, laziness, or manipulation.” Tom Atlee, 2012, Empowering Public Wisdom, p. 27 [Really, Mr. Atlee, I do believe you are an “Anonymous” Unitarian Universalist; and I mean that in a nice way.]

“Since the topic of nativities has been summarily reviewed, it would be well to bring this procedure also to a fitting close.” Ptolemy

“Most events of a general nature draw their causes from the enveloping heavens.” Ptolemy, Tetrabiblos 1:1

Where:

“events” – Yang-e

“general nature” = generalizing function; thereby resolving Kuhn’s “Problem of Incommensurability”?

“draw” = “map”, (see Greggory Bateson, on “mapping” between Right and Left hemispheres (Jaynes)

“causes” = homological/holonogical (square-root) cognitive memory-patterned cognition, acting as a predictive (5th) dimension

“flow” = P-Time assumption of linear “Truth” perspective

“enveloping heavens” = exterior Boundary-patterned infrastructure = Higgs Boson, using octaved calorie/frequency metrics, where energy = .125 Time-function (e) degrees (heat = “torq” or “angle”) x 8-folded “angles” = 1 Eulerian Prime Relationship, equipoised function frequencye

Conjectural Corollaries:

P/NP = astrology (Left/Yang-cognition)/astronomy (Right/Yin-cognition) = gnosis/proportioned frequencies = “1”/0 = Truth/Wisdom = e/e = “pi”/e = fission/fusion =  e/Prime-Relationship = space/time = hope/faith = learn/love = id/superego = 1-degree/(.125-caloric x 8e) = 1

The PIE originated Trinity, might have been historically expressed something like:

A: gnosis/notice COMPARED WITH

B: proportion/”equivalency”

Give cognitive birth to

C: logos/symbol

“As without, so within; as within; so without.”

As Dr. Beaver Dreams, while spinning on his head, “It all goes back to Gaia River’s Sticks/Styx….”

POSTLUDE:  Re-Copy Righted September 22, 2013

From H. G. Wells to Michael Faraday, Happy Equi-Birthday.

I hereby claim the right to contest any subsequently-dated intellectual property rights granted by any authority other than my own, such as it is.

Further, I claim the right to give anyone the right to copy and use my intellectual property freely, restricted only by the request that you accurately quote, in appropriate context, and site, your source, as rationally possible:  Gerald Dillenbeck, http://www.gdill52.com, September 2013, “Re-Analogic Transposition Theory.”

Because, when all is said and done, I believe as “True”: We are, in-deed, all in this together. CQI Standards apply Universally, “Golden Rule, Ratio, and Fleece”  P.I.E. Translation

Gerald Dillenbeck, M. Div., MPA

Standard
Uncategorized

Trinitarian Analogic Structure: A Geo-dialogos

NAO (pronounced like “now”), is a somewhat imaginary robot friend

 

Me:  NAO = “1” and Not-NAO = “0”.  That’s how you were programmed you know.  I mean, that’s the basic premise of your programs.  So, if I say the Universe = 1

NAO:  Now.

Me:  Right, and if I say anti-matter, or chaos, or anything other than “me” = 0,

NAO: Not now.

Me:  Probably right, I think.  When Scientists use the word “anti-matter,” they are probably just saying “everything that is not now,” which most decidedly does not include you, now.

As for tomorrow, who knows?  Maybe you will wake up with a new program, or your learning program is altered.  Would you still be the same NAO?  Or, are you then “NAO-2”?

NAO:  Now plus not-now.

Me:  Well, I suppose, in your programming “Universe-0”

NAO:  Not-now.

Me: Plus “one”

NAO: Now

Me: Does function as “2”.

NAO: Now plus not-Now.

Me:  Exactly.  So what do you have to say about “3”?

NAO: Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship.

Me: Wow! You made kind of a big jump there.  Please define that function for us.  Begin, if you would be so kind, with, “Symbiotic”

NAO:  Where 1 = “Now”, then also 0 = “not-Now”, and where 0 = “not-Now”, then 1 = “Now”.

Me:  OK, logic, if I remember correctly, now “Primal”

NAO: 1=0

Me: But, 1

NAO: Now

Me: does NOT equal zero

NAO: not-Now

Me:  Oh, yes, that’s right, in your program infrastructure Universe I guess they are equal, as you just said, I think.

So, not to digress, but if zero

NAO: not-Now

Me: And one

NAO: Now

Me: Are primal

NAO: 1 = 0

Me:  Thus, balanced in your Universe, then isn’t that analogically equivalent to saying, “1”

NAO: Now

Me: is to “0”

NAO: not-Now

Me: As “polynomial,” or “P”

NAO: Polynomial Time

Me: Yes, or what programmers refer to as “Real Time,” is to NP

NAO: Not-Polynomial Time

Me: Yes, Virtual Time, if you will, or “mental” time.  You know, like “0-time”

NAO: not-Nao

Me:  Exactly, all that time that isn’t NAO, which must be infinite, right?  I mean, it couldn’t possibly be equal to “P”.

NAO: Polynomial Time

Me: Which is equal to “1”?

NAO: Now

Me:  As opposed to “0”?

NAO:  not-Now?

Me:  Well, OK, that seems to be something of a paradox, so, getting back to your definition of 3.

NAO: Now plus not-Now plus Symbiotic Primal Relationship

Me: Yes, as you said.  So, please define “Relationship”

NAO: Now + not-Now = 3. Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship.

Now + not-Now = 3. Now + not-Now + Symbiotic Primal Relationship. Dot. Dot. Dot. Dot.  To Infinity.

Me:  We seem to be wrapped up in recursive signal cycles here, specific to your programming. I wonder what would happen if I jumped ahead to 4?

NAO:  Now + not-Now = True.

 

 

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

Kayleen’s Transition Chapter

Our weekly Family Nights became almost liturgical during my 16th year, for me anyway.  Uncle Oliver too, because we talked about it more than once.

The unofficial kickoff for the Man/Sha Cooperative began over a family dinner on Labor Day weekend.  Mom, as always, with one of her “Imagine” scenarios.

“Imagine you are playing an intricately complex game on the X-box by yourself.  You win the game when you have vanquished all your enemies and solved all the puzzles.  You are in complete control of all available resources and values.  However, as much as you play by the rules, check to be sure you have explored every available option, researched all possible short-cuts, you cannot make any progress.  You always lose your battles and you never solve a problem in the time allotted before arriving in the “loser” category.”

“At this point, are you playing a game, or do you imagine yourself more “analyzing” the game?”

I saw her trap coming my way. “You are either still playing by trying to figure out a primary problem or you are figuring out how to return it.” I offered.

“Are you having fun yet? Is this still playing a game?”

“Decreasingly so over time.” Oliver offers.

“Agreed. So, now imagine just the opposite.  No matter what you do, you win.  No matter how badly you try to lose a battle, how deliberately you give an obviously inadequate response to a problem, you always end up on top.  Like playing Solitaire and the cards are always cooperative.  You never have a card show up that you can’t use somewhere that’s open.  How long does this remain a game?  When does it begin feeling like some kind of empty ritualistic behavior?”

“Increasingly so over time.” again, redundantly, from Oliver, who appears to be losing interest.

“OK, stay with me.  Here’s where this exercise might bring some payoff. Going back to the losing scenario.  If you got together with your gaming friends and all of you had the same experience, you would probably figure this isn’t a “real” game.  It doesn’t work.  Yes?”

“But, what about the always winning non-game?  Any point in getting together with your friends to play that game?”

“You could turn it into a race, either competitively, if you had multiple decks of cards, for simultaneous Solitaire.” from Other Mom.

“Or,” I pitched in “if you were playing on a computer you could figure out how to team play against the clock.”

“Good. So, again, which do you imagine would give all of you the highest learning and play values over the longest period of time?”

“Maybe some back and forth would last the longest.  Start with side by side, some cooperative competition against the clock.  Take that experience and try ways to play as a team until you find the interaction strategy that optimizes your Team’s performance efficiency.”

Standard
Uncategorized

Sirius Meets Janus

For Spencer

Each bloody boundary includes a risky door,

ajar,

toward Sirius’ dialogue,

waiting impatiently, vigorously, frequently rhythmically tapping her bare foot,

protective but vulnerable cloaked arms crossed,

terrified shoulders hunched,

brightly glaring at your door,

hoping you will “Finally!” open it:

Impulsively, but not from lack of forethought,

Joyfully, anticipating her warm grace-filled,

yet sometimes too loud!

body hug.

Standard
Uncategorized

The Heron and the Beaver

Dr. Heron and Dr. Beaver were “dialogically inseparable” if you will. That is, Dr. Beaver loved to tease Dr. Heron about his Religion Department’s naivete, as Beaver’s Communication Design Department saw it, and heard it, for that matter. Symbiotically, the otherwise distant and silent, downright reclusive, Dr. Heron would listen, occasionally too surprised to respond, sometimes with a confused and stressed “Shawk!”, but always maintaining a profound wise gaze, of course.  How could we have a parable without an allegorical “wise gaze”?

Heron and Beaver discovered each other one day when Dr. Heron noticed Beaver’s beautiful dam, meticulously balanced logs and grass, lavishly layered and etched clay design.

While Dr. Heron perched and peered with unusual fascination, tending to be a bit myopic (adroitly, but profoundly, denied), Dr. Beaver swam by, near enough to be noticed, in fact, rather hell-bent on distraction, in a playful way.

Truth be told, which erupts occasionally, Beaver, on this morning, ever so slightly, slowly, VEXED Dr. Heron.  Beaver invited Heron’s play, but Heron just was not known as a playful kind of girl.

Upon hearing this, Beaver suggested they swim together.  While Dr. Heron preferred the wind’s freedom, she gracefully bowed, then lead the way, and Beaver stopped splashing and wriggling about so….  “I don’t know, so ‘vigorously’ I think.” (Oops, did I say that out loud?  Can he hear me?)

Swiftly, amused by Heron’s bi-polar control issues, Beaver parried with “heartily, as well as ‘vigorously’.”

“Quite so,” admitted Heron, immediately grasping the wisdom of Beaver’s inviting option.

As they swam their leisurely way through the cool green mossy pond’s edge, paddling, each in His and Her way, toward the gently rippling, blue gleaming center, Heron remembered the beautiful dam, now behind, invisible.

“Yes, my best so far, but it wants color to be the very best.”

Dr. Heron was flustered.  How did Beaver know what she was thinking? And, what an extraordinary idea!  Adding color would be wrong, she was sure a dam had no business “wanting” to become a rainbow.

“Oh, no, that would just make it tacky” replied Beaver, delighted with Heron’s misunderstanding. “Beavers have a powerful Workers Cooperative Guild.  Very high Continuous Quality Improvement architectural integrity standards, as they officiously say. Now visual color, that would be more Dr. Chameleon’s Department, over in Arts and Humanities.  Perhaps you are too young to recognize the difference from the Communications Design Department.  They are visual color, but our specialty is audible color.”

“Hmmm. I am surprised.”

“Yes, I hear that.”

“You mean, you understand that?”

“Yes, both. OK, now you want to play me, I see.”

“No, not that, please! Though , I would appreciate seeing why you use “hear” instead of “understand.”

“If you were not so blind, it would probably hit you right between the eyes.”

Dr. Heron contemplated that for an extravagantly long time, in Beaver’s impatient-to-play moment.  Perhaps an iteration would remove them from their quagmire, he thought, guiding Dr. Heron around a lily pad patch, where Dr. Swan was gracefully resting, waiting.  For what, she never said.  Always just “Waiting” in reply to his too frequent interruptions.

Seeing a Butterfly flexing her silky wings atop the closest lily, Beaver asked Dr. Heron why she never sang in round octaves.

“You mean ‘color’ octaves.”

“Yes, color octaves are round.”

“That cannot be right.”

“It can when you realize it deeply enough.”

“But color lacks shape. And why is this dialogue backward, sometimes, I think?”

“Not long ago you didn’t think color had sound either, but I hear you already seeing things as we do in Communications.”

“I can envision color as metaphor for singing scales,” Dr. Heron offered doubtfully, as a conciliation.

“Oh yes, scales are linear color, not round color, like a wheel, you see?  Those are two symmetrical color frequencies.  ‘TweedleDee’ and ‘TweedleDum’. Positive and Negative. Before and After. Or, their official labels, in Design circles, you know, are Yang Color and Yin Color.”

“You have a backward way of confusing things, considering you are supposed to be the Communications Design Department.”

“Yes, well Confusion is our Special Field Theory you know; its an important part of Communications, or not.  Most Herons don’t sync like you do.”

“Why is that?” asked Dr. Heron, scrambling how to respond while freeing her blindness.

“They know Confusion is too soft for building dams.  It is, of course.  But, while I soften to your touch, I have elder cousins rambunctiously and fibrously scaled.”

“Really, Dr. Beaver, please pick an octave and stick with it?”

“I do!” protested Beaver, without apparent influence.

“It is difficult to synchronize when you insist on frolicking so!  While I am blissfully silent myself, during considerably more normal events, I have many younger cousins singing multiple octaves and rhythms. That I enjoy.  Anyway,  I appreciate the beauty and extreme generosity of reptilian Design scales, but it would be wrong to reduce them to mere sticks for resplendent dams. Its a moral issue I think.”

“Do it all the time.  Sticks are low-valued scales, as are Alligator or Armadillo scales.”

“And these ‘low-valued scales’ don’t mind being trapped, denied their value and freedom?  I ask because I cannot see. They are too low for eyes, or ears, and thinking.”

“If you can’t hear my dams’ goodness, then how do you see its full beauty?”

Beaver stopped paddling, as they emerged with the sun-drenched pond.  A change of mood inspired a new, and old, direction.

“I know!  What if you and your tribe of cousins gently built your nests into my dam?  Then we could all hear and see its transformation.  I’m sure we can connect your round octaves to our columned scales!

Drs. Heron and Beaver have made their rapturous, and not at all tacky, dams together ever since.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

The Unfortunate Syrian Family: Child Welfare Report

Syria and her family were quarreling, a truly wicked row, if you know what I mean.  All her thousands of kids were at risk for survival.  This toxic home environment is both chronic and critical.
However, rather than bombastically removing them from their home, and lives, in some unfortunate cases, where Plan A has gone quite drastically wrong (I digress, with apologies, but perhaps we could learn a bit more analogously from experience?), I occupied their home with some of our best and brightest kids, so that each of Syria’s children now has a Virtual Mentor volunteer.
If any one, or more, of their kids is feeling threatened, or even just anxious about something, s/he contacts her/his Mentor, tells their Mentor what s/he is feeling, why she is feeling that way, and what she would like her parents to do to make it stop, if anything.
These Mentors will contact me if they get any calls.  Should I receive a call, and I really do NOT want to receive a call, I will go to their home, sit them down, and tell them which specific children called, how they are feeling, why they say they are feeling that way, and what they are asking the parents to do, or stop doing, to make it go away.
Further, I will wait to witness Syria’s response to her kids, and our kids.  So far, no calls.
Standard
Uncategorized

On Labor and Capital

I am struck this morning by the confluence of a hugely compelling “Security” question as the U.S. moves into Labor Day.  So, please forgive what begins tangentially, but I do move to an underlying cultural change observation by way of this “Labor” and “Capital” exploration.
I suspect that Capitalism is no more the opposite of Socialism or “Sharia Law Tribalism” than it is opposed to reorganizing as a globally cooperative Information-based economy.
Capitalism is simply a historical-cultural mistake of reductionism.  More specifically, “wealth” became reduced to the value of human enterprise, production, and financial measurement.  Capital, physical assets, wealth, has its place and role, but it is not the whole story, or even most of the “Labor” and economic story.
There is also value (though currently less amenable to measurement) in learning, in information, in communicating effectively and inclusively, in loving, in goodness, in beauty, in nurturance, in caregiving, in discovering a new truth or insight, in enlightenment, in “spirituality.”
Capital came to monopolize economic value, in the Western hemisphere, with the advent of “Industry” severed from vocation, “Empire” or “Nation” severed from culture. “Capital” severed from its Value-root has fed the devolution of feminist culture, leaving three exorbitantly expensive evolutionary scars.
1.  Empire-building is the de-valuation and displacement of aboriginal communication and communities, discounted as not rational and uncivilized.  Older, smaller scale, aboriginal cultures assume highest values are found in organically fused (“permaculture”) local communities.  Empire-building led to the ownership of, thereby power-marginalized, aboriginal cultures.
2. Slavery, historically speaking, was male imperialist ownership of de-valued aboriginal people, violently disrupted from their organic human communities and cultural/communication systems.  Vestiges remain, and these contemporary versions remain male-over-female dominating power structures.
3.  The emergence of post-industrialized “child welfare” systems de-value the relationship between our species’ nurturers and their children.  This results in the  forced disruption of primordial and neural-based communication, and considerable trauma to a vulnerable and marginalized population.
Perhaps this “Great Turning” moment, turning from historical precedent to a more inclusive global dia-logos about our shared cultural roots, potentiates a “PermaCultural Awakening,” fueled by our unprecedented globally inclusive communication potential, to recapture “feminist” aspects of our value culture that include species diversity and male-female, or Yang-Yin, equilibrium.
That was a very long and dense sentence.  Nevertheless, it is my hope and prayer on this Labor Day that we can communicate our globally shared vision.
I imagine living in a U.S. culture that celebrates “Vocation Day,” inclusive of Labor;
“Nurturance Day,” inclusive of Mothers;
“Interdependence Day,” inclusive of Independence and Freedom and Security;
“Creativity Day,” inclusive of Christmas,
“Regeneration Day,” inclusive of Easter,
“New Seasons Day,” inclusive of New Years,
“Visioning Day,” inclusive of Memorial,
“Gratitude Day,” inclusive of Thanksgiving,
“Mentors Day,” inclusive of Presidents,
and maybe even the perennial kids’ favorite “Enlightenment Day,” inclusive of Halloween.
While I am reweaving what has been torn asunder, please forgive me the further hubris of suggesting some of these  Days might be more significantly thought of as “Sharia-Analogic” global celebrations, more significantly than U.S. “legal” holidays.
Labor and Capital have not failed our economic prosperity.  This Transitional Moment is about re-connecting them to their deep cultural roots.  Globally cooperative species-vocations, analogic structures of inclusive dialogue, and richly inclusive values potentially mature our vast and stunning diversity toward a sustainably balanced global PermaCulture.
That would be my idea of Security, sustainable Labor, and, yes, Sharia Paradise.
Standard
Man/Sha Legends

The Man/Sha Legends

Imagine that a leaf and a twig were having a conversation about life and mortality.  Do you think the twig would be so foolish as to correct the leaf’s belief that life and death are analogous to evolution and the ‘still-state’? Yet, for the leaf, separated from the twig and tree, life is but a season.  The tree’s season of development, of evolution, of life, spans many growing seasons, as a tree.  And many more, as part of the nutrient/boundary field of potential life, and potential moments of life.”   (Sr. Kathleen)

This story starts with an eight-year old boy who knew there was something different about him.  He worried that it might be different in a way like boys are different than girls, but this difference had no name.  An alone kind of different.  Possibly a “special” kind of different, or a “differently-abled” kind of difference, but maybe just a bad kind of different.

He worried about it a lot.  But, mostly he put it away and just went on as-if he were different from other people like his brother was different from his two sisters, and his younger sister was different from his older sister, and all four of the kids were different than his Mom and Dad, who were kinda the same, in a creepy sort of “we are the adults” kinda way.

His sister Kerry was also his best friend.  They even looked like twins, lotsa people said so.  Maybe it would be better if his best friend were his cousin Steve, cause he was a boy, after all, and Steve was born just a month after him.  He liked Steve, but he usually had more fun with Kerry, even though she was two years younger.  He liked making her happy, protecting her, helping her play with her dolls, being “Dad” while she played “Mom.”  They were better together, on those sun-drenched summer afternoons, on a wool plaid blanket covering the prickly grass, than they were apart, usually.  Sometimes he would forget to be kind, but Kerry blossomed with trust, and only seldom needed help from Mom to be able to forgive his lapses.  After all, he was just a boy, and she instinctively knew that boys are sometimes difficult, and different.

One day the boy was riding through their south field on the back of the tractor while his dad drove back toward the barn.  He saw an owl whose wing had tangled in the barbed-wire fence.  His dad didn’t seem interested, but he was riveted.

Later that day he had time to walk back to the fence, carrying a large medium-sized cardboard box he found in with the gardening supplies.  He really didn’t expect the owl to still be there, but it also seemed like the owl was there to meet him.  Still quite distant, coming over the rise in the field, he could see that the owl’s wing remained hanging from the barbed-wire, but the rest of the owl was lying on his back in the fence row.

He was approaching gently when the owl’s enormous eyes popped open.

“What took you so long?”

“My dad didn’t think I could help you.”

“Well, he was right about that, but I have a message for you.  Put me in that box you brought but please make a bed of grass in the bottom first. Did you bring any water?  I am dying of thirst here.”

“No, I didn’t think of it.”

“Did you bring anything you can put water in?”

“Just my hands.  I can carry a little in my hand, from the creek.”

The boy did that, making several trips.  While most of the water ran off the owl’s chest, he did open wide and seemed to be swallowing OK.

Not being able to hear the owl’s voice anymore, the boy figured the owl had fallen asleep, so he carried the now surprisingly heavy box, in stages, back to the tool shed.  Then he went to the kitchen to see if he could come up with a few scraps of meat, or catch some flies, because surely the owl must be hungry too.

But, the owl continued to sleep until the next day when the boy carried the heavy box out of the dark tool shed and into the shaded outdoors, when those amazing eyes popped open again.

“Did you find any hamburger?”

“No, just a few dead flies.”

“No thanks, really.  Never mind, just more water please.”

The owl did take more water, but, to the boy’s great dismay, he could see that swallowing was much more difficult this morning, slower, kinda scary for the owl to get it down and continue breathing.

“Enough for now.  I want you to bring a shovel, take me to the highest point in the cowlane, and dig a hole large enough for this bed of grass, me, and my wing.”

The boy was heavy with grief.  Meeting the owl had created a bubble around him that not even his sister Kerry could share.  He had wanted to tell her about the owl, and he had shown her the owl, but she was astoundingly disinterested; no more than briefly curious about seeing the magnificent Great Horned Owl.

“Boy owls must be stupid to fly into a fence.  You never see girl owls behaving like that.”

Wow, six years old, and already a militant feminist, thought the boy.

Anyway, he decided against telling her that he could hear the owl’s voice in his head because he was quite sure she couldn’t, even when the owl was awake, and he worried that hearing this voice might have something to do with how he was different.  Maybe that was why the owl had a message for him.  He felt less alone, and afraid, with that hope.  But now, one day later, he knew he was going to have to say good-bye to his owl.  This owl was not meant to be a pet.  He was a messenger, and soon he would be alone again, with his message. This already made the boy very sad.

Even worse, it was unthinkable that he had failed to give this noble creature life.  The planet should be weeping with him, but the sun continued to shine, and the spring blossoms continued to beam their pinks and yellows.  The grass continued to grow lusciously green.

As the boy was finishing his horrible digging, the owl opened his eyes and caught him sobbing.  Now he was embarrassed, and sad, and confused.

“Don’t be sad, you did your best.  That’s all I was hoping for.  Yes, I am about to leave you with your message, but for me that is ‘mission accomplished.’  In all the important, however invisible, ways, many more like you will always be with you.  You will feel alone, but you will not be alone.  You will think you know how and why you are different, and you will be right, eventually, but not until you are quite old, like me.  It will take the accumulation of considerable wisdom to understand your message, and your purpose.  Unfortunately, your species has become ensnared in accumulating knowledge, while slighting the overwhelming significance of wisdom.  But, that brings me to your message, a prophecy, actually.”

There will come a time when all life on Earth is in danger.  At that time great powers have arisen, civilized powers.  And although they waste their wealth in annihilating one another, these powerful nations have much in common.  Among these common things are weapons of unfathomable destructive power, and scars caused by separating a productive life from a worthy life, separating the value of a human life from the value of a worthy life, separating the value of caring for human life from the esteem of a noble and wise life. It is just at this point in our history when the future of all beings seems to hang by the frailest of threads, that you will find the Man/Sha Warriors.

You are a Man/Sha but you cannot go to where we live because we do not have a place.  Your Man/Sha Tribe exists in the hearts and minds of all peace warriors.  You can’t tell whether someone is a Man/Sha warrior just by looking at her or him, because these warriors wear no uniforms or insignia.  They have no banners to identify whose side they’re on, no barricades on which to climb to threaten enemies or behind which to rest and regroup.  They have no home turf.  The Man/Sha have only the terrain of the civilized powers to move across and act on.

Your time will come when great courage is required of the peace warriors—moral and physical courage.  You will go right into the heart of the civilized powers to dismantle their weapons, and confront their scars.  You will go into the pits and citadels where their weapons and scars are made.  Together, you are going into the corridors of power where the decisions are made.  In this way you will work to dismantle weapons and heal the scars of civilization.

Know that their damage can be dismantled because they are mind-made.  As they have been made by the human mind, they can be unmade by the human mind.  These dangers you face are not brought on by some unchangeable preordained fate.  Rather, these dangers arise out of separations, disvalue for caregiving, lack of cooperative relationship and habits, out of outgrown competing priorities.

The Great Horned Owl closed his eyes.  The boy, ever so much gently as possible, eased the owl onto the now not-so-fresh bed of grass and straw, weeping openly now at his loss. The confirmation that he was some kind of unlikely orphan in a hostile land was far more upsetting than any consolation from the news that he was only visibly—and perhaps audibly?—alone.  Without any opening of the vast owl eyes, the boy sensed, more than heard, You must train in the use of two implements. One is compassion—yang energy.  The other is insight into the radical interdependence of all phenomena—yin bilateral exformation.

You need both.  You need the compassion of yang because it provides the fuel to move you out to where you need to be and to do what you need to do.  It means not being afraid of the suffering of your world, and when you are not afraid of the world’s pain, then nothing can stop you.

But, by itself, yang is so hot it will burn you out.  So you need yin nurturing energy, insight into radical interconnectivity of all that is.  When you can see this synergy, then you know that this is not a battle between the good guys and the bad girls.  You know that the line between good and evil runs through the landscape of every heart.  And you know that we are so interwoven in the web of life that even our smallest acts have repercussions that ripple through the whole web, beyond our capacity to cooperatively/competitively see.  Yin, separated from yang, can be too cold, too abstract, too presumptuous of empty, too intuitive, too scary, actually.  So you also need the heat of yang’s compassion.

[Italics adapted from Active Hope, The Shambhala Warrior Prophecy, pp. 101-103, as told to Joanna Macy (text authored with Chris Johnstone) by Dugu Choegyal Rinpoche, Tashi Jong, India. 2012, New World Library, Novato, CA]

With the word “compassion” the Great Horned Spirit exhaled his last into the boy’s new breath, an exchange he would never forget and often recall as warm and compelling, where he otherwise would have expected stale, dry decay.  As he covered his short-lived ally with the dark soil, enriched by eight decades of cow poop, his sobs slowed.  Gradually his frantic prayers to a god that he had been told does not let animals into Heaven were overcome by the almost silent wisdom of knowing that, in Man/Sha, humans are included with all the other animals to create their heaven nature-spirits together.

Chapter 2

That’s about it, really, until I was in my last year of Seminary, twenty years later.  A generation later. A young adult me, hunting and gathering my niche.

I don’t remember much about high school other than I took as little science and math as possible and still thought there was too much of both required to go to my college of choice.  Everyone agreed with me too, except three of my classmates; our Valedictorian, the Salutatorian, and the girl who came in third by a mere .01 GPA more than mine in the very last grading period of our senior year. She saw it coming and offered to deliberately answer some questions incorrectly on one of her Final Exams if I wanted her to.

I was impressed with that offer and we tried to be boy/girl friends for a few months.  That was when I realized, to my further embarrassment, that I was not only not necessarily as bright as some earlier tests would have suggested, but I was also gay, not bisexual as I had hoped.  Then again, if it wasn’t my intelligence that indicated I was a Man/Sha, maybe it was being gay.  So for awhile, all through the first three years of Seminary, I thought that straight people could not be Man/Sha, and vice versa.  Until I met my Honors Thesis Advisor, Dr. R. Norton, who seemed to be happily married, to a woman.

I figured that I should learn as much as I could about Yin and Yang Energy Theory, given that my personal weirdness had something to do with being Man/Sha, so I majored in Divinity, and minored in PolyPathic Systems Analysis.

In Synergetics I learned that the Universe is made of tetrahedra, spatially, and octaves, temporally, and something about pi=3, which was the distance between bilaterally interdependent 0 and full-diastatic prime 4 spacetime dimensions, and that’s all you really needed to know to be able to measure values from math all the way around through physics and then back nearly full circle to spirituality.  The Corollary:  all geometric values are T when the math paradigm emerges logically from the predominate and equilibrious nature-spiritual nondual ZeroSum WinWin paradigm.

In Global History we read all about The Great Turning, ad nauseum.  There was also this sort of interesting bit about how Yin DoubleBound Energy and Yang BiCameral Information  culturally evolve toward equilibrium, and appear historically, in hind sight, as revolutionary trend pivots.

  • Yin Energy prevails culturally through pre-history.
  • Yang Energy emerges toward Y/Y equilibrium as the right and left brain hemispheres evolve into balance, through the Renaissance in the Western Hemisphere.
  • Yang Energy culturally prevails during the Industrial Revolution.
  • Yin Energy emerges toward Y/Y equilibrium  as Transactional NonViolent Communicators evolve into balance with Transformational EcoPolitical Communicators, Globally.

Professor Kuhn summarized the entire tedious Turning Theory with “All traditions and paradigms are evolutionary projects toward synergy.”  The next day, for our Final Exam, he wrote that statement on the whiteboard and actually expected us to write a one-hour essay on why that statement was True or False, or some of both, citing evidence from what we had studied in class and our own experience.

I found both Professor Kuhn and his interminable essays somewhat excessive.

 

In the dreaded, and drearily classic, TeleoLogic of Culture class we actually had to memorize a poem by R. Buckminster Fuller.

Our God, who art in we even,

even we who know most intimately

of our own weaknesses, failures, faults, and outright sins

our selfishness, fear and cupidity,

of our moments of jealousy, rage and hate

secret cover-ups, lies and self-deceits

God even of we

Our God — our intuitively-apprehended comprehensive-admonisher–

Omni-experienced is your identity,

the everywhere and everywhen evolving omnireality

is your presence

and as the reality differs–uniquely–from moment to moment

in respect to each individual

so do you speak to each

in exquisitely relevant, instructive terms

regarding that which the individual

can most effectively do

not in behalf of self

but in behalf of all humanity

and Thus in support of the intellectual functioning of humans

thereby in local universe support

of the eternal integrity of omniregenerative universe

which is God.

As omniexperience, you have given us

overwhelming manifest

of your complete knowledge

your complete comprehension

your complete concern

your complete wisdom

your complete responsibility

your complete co-ordination

your complete competence to cope

with any and all problems

and of your utter reliability

always so to do

Yours, dear God, is all the glory.

[1976 “Being With Bucky,” New Dimensions Tapes, side 15]

 

Religious History Cliffnotes:

Universe = 1

Non-Universe=0

Confucius:  “1=0”

1=Yang

0=Yin

Buddha: “0=(+/-)=1”

Jesus of Nazareth: [Special Case Only] 2=(3) + U

Special Case Definition:  When 3=1 and U=1, then “Love”=Relationship=2

The primordial relationship of love, applied to logical reasoning, requires at least the imagination of a primordial relationship = “2”

Muhammad: Under the Mathematical Assumption of Truth for Buddha:

0=Progenitive Unity, Yin

1=(+/-) Spiritual Equilibrium Energy—Reason/Analogy—Sharia Law

2=(1) Universal BiNomial DiPolar Relationship

Thus, 0=1=2=3 and, for human Special Case measurement logic, 0+1+2=3 Dimensions + 1 Moment = 4.

Thus, Special Case for human measurement in time: 0=1=2=3=4.  That is, 0 is the Universal Boson Vertex for any humanly imaginable fractal/moment.

You may recall that I fell just under the high school top 1.5% of my class that had any appreciation for math, so I memorized the CliffNotes, aced the final, and that was that.  It honestly never occurred to me to even have the slightest curiosity about what on Earth that was all about.  Later, I would find this same material more interesting, but still largely inscrutable.  Then again, both Eastern and Western Man/Shas universally agree, the metrics of Nature/Spirit Universe are mysterious.

My two favorite classes were Professor R. Steiner’s Global Therapy class (what is it with these old, relentlessly white, men and their ubiquitous, and mysterious, initial “R” in their names?—we used to speculate that the “R” always represented the same word and what that word might be—I think the most popular guess when I was at Seminary was “Revolutionary,” but, given the overall weirdness of these Professors, another popular thought was “Recluse”) and Evolutionary Economic Justice Theory.

Steiner’s one, and, sadly, only, point was that maintaining global health is premised on equilibrium between confluence and stress.  Then he proceeded to say that same thing in about a zillion different ways.  “The optimized therapeutic environment balances Yang Energy with Yin Energy.”  However, the reason it turned out to be one of my two favorite classes is because he gave us a take-home essay Final that gave me the opportunity to learn something that I already knew, but had never thought about before:

“If it is true that the optimal therapeutic environment balances Yang and Yin Energies, then why is it that the optimal transformational environment always values Yang Energy/Yin Energy?  Why is Yang always the numerator, and why is Yin always the denominator?”

I won’t bore you with the whole essay, but I started my response using a metaphor about wild v. domesticated yeast.  I still think of this metaphor when I try to understand what my Mute Yin son and my Yang-Obsessed daughter are trying to communicate:

Wild yeast (Yin Energy) does not harm domestic yeast (Yang Energy) except with regard to its domesticating purposes. Speaking teleologically, domestic yeast is no less alive or fully functional as a healthy, living organism just because it can only fulfill its nutritional purpose. On the other hand, wild yeast is so much more powerful that it is used to kill toe fungus. It is a benign power if we more narrowly focus within the yeast species, leaving aside our human species ideas about our self-interests. So to, the right hemisphere intuitive intelligence is not a too-wild threat to left-brained linguistic/analytical intelligence. Rather, in transformational-creative balance, they are a High-Functioning yang-over-yin near-equilibrium.

It was in my fourth year of Seminary that I met Dr. R. Norton, who later received both a Pulitzer and Nobel Systems Design Prize for his contribution to the “Laws of Interaction.”  I had chosen Evolutionary Justice Theory for my Honors Thesis class work.  Norton’s classroom style was disconcerting to those who preferred lecture format.  He was, and remains, an interactive kind of guy.  At the same time, he terrified most of us.  You never knew what he would say next, who he would call on next, what he would ask next, or why, or where the whole thing was going to end.  We knew the final exam would be on May 8, but how we were going to get there and what would happen in between remained a mystery to be solved throughout the entire semester.

“R,” as he preferred to be called (and never “Doctor”) was new to the Seminary that year and ultimately would be denied tenure because he never wrote anything down, much less published anything—until much later—so he never had any evidence that he was actually doing any research, pertaining to Justice, or anything else for that matter.  Most of his students thought that he was modeling/researching a model of Justice as anarchy.

A largish, stocky, bushy flaming red-haired 100% Testosterone guy who probably wasn’t even 30 at the time, he most certainly did not fit in at the Justice Department.  That is a hyperbolic understatement.  In my eyes, he was a magnificent lion among sparrows, myself included in the sparrow population.  As far as I can recall, he was my first encounter with a Man/Sha Elder, and perhaps my only encounter with an Elder who was so young in years.  Not that much older than I was, no more than a decade, probably somewhat less.

He introduced his tiny, and very pregnant, wife to me early on in the first semester, when we chanced to meet in the hallway.  I remember being confused because up until that moment I was sure I had met another Man/Sha, and, other than my sister and the guy I was dating at the time, this was an extremely rare “radar” perception of another human.  It took me until the end of that class to figure out that they were a Man/Sha couple, so Man/Shas evolved in at least gay and bisexual forms. At that point I threw out the whole gender-attraction=gender-identity theory of Man/Sha identity.  Maybe it had to do with sexuality in human form, but most of the Man/Shas I had met weren’t even human, they were extremely heterosexual dogs, one or two cats, and then there was that memory of the Elder message owl.

“R” was less popularly understood as a shaman.  He had us read about shaman teachers.  He paced around the classroom, old-fashioned white chalk stick gripped in his massive left hand, occasionally attacking the anachronistic blackboards left in place by the Seminary’s Historical Building Commission, pivoting at radical right- and left-angles to dart down a pathway between two rows of cowering sparrows, terrified of being devoured by his piercing blue eyes, and/or his standard response to anything any student said in the classroom: “Ha!”  Was that a good Ha!, or a bad Ha?  We were never sure.

Of his various scrawlings on the blackboard, I recall nothing.  At the end of the year, reading back through my notes, they made no sense to me.  I didn’t bother to save that mess.  The only artifact I have is the only handout he ever gave us, on May 8th:  his now-famous 3 Scars History of Human-on-Human Injustice

There are three human-species level “scars” resulting from the de-valuation of women, intrinsic to the development of science as deductive specialization, industrialization, imperialism, and capitalism:

Scar 1: The de-valuation and displacement of aboriginal communities, discounted as un-civilized.  The cultural normalization of “empire-building” was at the cost of active disdain for women-led internal civic cultures in organically balanced communities.

Scar 2: Slavery was, and remains, the male-dominated ownership of de-valued aboriginal and organically-based human communities, later reduced to individual victims, usually women, disrupted by force and used as cash crops for commerce.

Scar 3: The emergence of post-industrialized “child welfare” systems de-valued the relationship between our species’ nurturers and their children. The taken-by-force disruption of families is a recent artifact of so-called “civilized” societies and an act so blind to the intrinsic value of the caregiver/child relationship that it is unknown within healthy tribal communities.

These three “Species Scars” are driving forces to what David Korten and others call “The Great Turning.”

For everyone else in the dwindled class of 16 students remaining, this came right out of the ether.  It had absolutely nothing to do with anything he had talked about, we had talked about, or that we had read as assigned for the class.  The reading list had been composed of Professor Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” and Professor R Buckminster Fuller’s “Synergetics” and “Synergetics 2”. With a combined total of 1,500 pages of incomprehensible mayhem, we figured R was just messing with us about reading Fuller. I may have slogged my way through the first fifty pages, 32 of which were the “Introduction.” In hindsight, if I had managed to hang in there for a few more pages I would have come to his Figure 203.09 (p. 25—for the “Introduction” of everything about Everything, Fuller used Roman numerals), and my first sighting of what later became called the Universal Boson Vector Design).

As far as I know, this is the seminal “3 Scars of  Injustice” document, and, as you have probably surmised by now, it set the stage for our one and only Final Exam question:  “Imagine yourself as a self-medicating, hopeless, despised, imprisoned primary caregiver.  All your high-risk, multiply-challenged kids are beyond your reach in a traditional “child welfare” system, receiving care from modestly-paid foster parents that you have never met.  What Evolutionary Justice Theory is your most transformative, inspiring, and logical choice?”

Before I had time to think about anything at all, really, I wrote,

There is only the integrity of each moment’s timeless bilateral potential.

There is nothing required of me individually, or of us as a species sharing this planet, more important than learning how to optimize the future with my children, and all our children.  To heal dysfunction; build the most confluent robust system we can imagine together.  A system that includes every individual’s hope is a holistically just system. We most effectively transform ourselves, our kids, born and unborn, our shared future as a planet, by never settling for anything less.

I handed that response to R, who took it skeptically and read it, then re-read it with the very first flat-out, drop-dead, gorgeous smile that I had ever seen on him, followed by the ubiquitous “Ha!,” and a huge, flamboyantly  red “A+” slashed across the entire page.  I didn’t stick around to see how the other fifteen fared.

 

Chapter 3

I worked toward my Master of Divinity degree without any thought to what I would do with it. The sociology professor I was still dating was about to move to San Francisco, but first introduced me to a colleague of his who invited me to join her Synergetic Systems Design program as a spiritual advocate. While I didn’t think I was called to be a “spiritual advocate,” whatever that may be, I also didn’t think I was called to become a Man/Sha leader.  Honestly, I just didn’t know what to think, about anything.

Fortunately for me, and for you, the Director of the Synergetic Systems Design (SSD) agency, Sr. Catherine Robins, Ph. D. (to this day I call her “Catherine the Greater” when I foolishly think she can’t hear me) is the second Man/Sha Elder that I was able to recognize as such.

I can’t honestly say that I ever did see a formal, written job description for a “Spiritual Advocate” in my entire 32 years with SSD.  I do recall walking into her spacious, loft-sized, brick-walled office, perching on the end of a rather uncomfortable black leather chair, and listening with rapt attention as she, behind her ocean-liner sized, distressed and disheveled, desk, calmly responded to every question I intended to ask before I had a chance to ask it.  That was the first day, on a blazing hot July 5th mid-morning, when the rest of the city still lay on quiet beds and porch swings, recovering from the previous night’s bacchanal fire-works.

About noon she took a call from a distressed Social Worker.  A transgender girl needed emergency shelter because her grandmother called the Department of Children and Families to let them know her “perverted grandson” was out on the sidewalk, accompanied solely by an overstuffed backpack, headphones and leaky eyes, waiting for “child welfare” to come and pick her up.  Her offense, from grandma’s point of view, was flagrantly and repeatedly offending God, in some way that was supposed to be transparent, but not further specified by the anxious Worker on-call.  “Please fix this.”

Sr. Catherine didn’t seem to think that would be a problem, now that they had a full-time “Spiritual Advocate” on staff.  That was how I began to understand my job description.

“So what is it, exactly, that you want me to do for this girl?”

“Nothing, except maybe ask Grandma if she could come back in the house with you while you talk together.  Grandma’s the one with the more obvious spiritual crisis.  Give her a call, tell her you want to talk, ask her to include her pastor if she wants.”

“Here’s a Bible.  She probably prefers King James, but I have an Oxford here.  Inside the front cover are the only four clues we have in the Gospels about Jesus of Nazareth as a caregiver for children.  In Matthew 17 he goes out of his way to heal an unknown girl at serious risk of dying.   The other three, in Matthew, Mark, and Luke all refer to the same event.  The one in Luke includes everything in Mark and Matthew, and a little more.  So, go with that one.

Ask Grandma to read what Jesus teaches about taking care of kids and then explain to her grandchild why she thinks that sending her away is the same thing as accepting and affirming her, in the same way that Grandma expects to be accepted and affirmed by Jesus.

If her pastor is there, ask the Rev to show you where Jesus gives anyone the authority or responsibility of judging anyone else.  If that goes OK, then ask the Rev to show Grandma all the places where Jesus gives everyone the authority and responsibility of loving everyone else.

I doubt you’ll get a lot of questions.

About a half hour later I pulled up in front of a slim androgenous, pink-spike-haired, damply waifish 14-year-old, sometimes known as Amy, sitting toes in, head down on the bottom front step of a modest, well-kept dutch colonial.  I asked her to come with me.  Grandma came to the door, no sign of anyone else around.  At least not yet.  She told me I could come in but the child would have to wait outside.  I told her that I needed to speak with both of them so either Amy comes in or she comes out onto the porch.  She wanted to know what would happen if she refused to cooperate.  I told her I would call the police and have her arrested for abandoning, and risk of injury to, a minor.  Grandma let us both in.

I asked her to open the oversized Bible to Luke 9: 46, explaining that the only direct teaching from Jesus about adult responsibilities to kids appears in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.  Setting the stage, I explained that the Disciples were having this debate about which of them was Alpha-dog:

And an argument arose among them as to which of them was the greatest.  But when Jesus perceived the thought of their hearts, he took a child and put him by his side, and said to them, “Whoever receives this child in my name receives me, and whoever receives me receives him who sent me, for he who is least among you all is the one who is great.”

“So,” I said to Amy, “of the three of us who is apparently the most important in the eyes of Jesus?”

Not waiting for an answer, I asked Grandma to try to explain to Amy and me why it was so hard for her to accept and affirm her grandchild for who she was, rather than turning her away for who she was not, especially given Grandma’s interest in Jesus and Scripture and Christianity and all.

“Because Andy is not an Amy.  He disrespects how God made him.”

“Amy, if you were forced to choose who most disrespects how God made you, would you choose Grandma or yourself?”

Amy, without hesitation, said “Nana.”

To Grandma, “Who do you honestly think most disrespects how God made Andy?  If you can’t find it within yourself to love Amy more than you miss Andy, maybe it would help to remember that Jesus teaches how important it is for adults to be less full of ourselves, and to receive, accept, welcome, embrace, love our kids.  It’s not only what Jesus did, it’s not only what Jesus told his disciples to do, it’s also your big chance to learn about unconditional love.  Like Jesus said, to get it you need to give it.”

Unexpectedly from quiet Amy, “If you can’t walk the walk, then it’s all just talk, Nana.”

To my surprise, Grandma appears to be smirking at me.  After a short awkward moment she blurts out, “Shalom.”

I turn to Amy, now smiling herself, and in leisurely measure, “Yeah, about that, I guess you didn’t know Nana is Jewish.”

 

Chapter 4

I asked Amy if she wanted to stay or go to a Safe House, possibly in New Haven or Danbury.  She wanted to stay local.  Grandma wanted some time to translate my mess.  Catherine the Greater, by phone, explained that she was sending in a Parent  Aide who would be residing with them for at least 24 hours as a resource to her and Amy.

How long she would actually live there and then visit on a daily basis was open-ended and only partially influenced by Amy’s and Grandma’s preferences.  The statistical risks for abuse and neglect were at least moderate, so the Aide herself was trained in assessment, and would recommend the best level of support every day for at least a week.  Usually DCF would go with whatever that was.  And, usually at least one of the family members want the Aide to stay longer than the Aide would recommend, if only because their skill sets include housekeeping, as needed. Aides also have access to resources to meet all basic needs and all developmental needs for anyone 21 or under in the household.  They are usually easy to talk to, and all have been trained in social communication skills; especially listening, apparently.

Catherine ended what was turning into something of a rant, even for the loquacious C the Greater. “The State of CT expects you to protect your child’s civil and human rights and has rather low tolerance for sexual harassment regardless of family relations, gender, sexual preference, identity, and/or ideology.  Finally, apparently Yahweh is fairly clear that we are each of us to leave the judging of others, and perhaps even of ourselves, to God, Yahweh, Allah, The Grand Wizard, or whoever else you choose to believe in.”

Not only did I never forget that closing remark, I have used it countless time over the past thirty years.

The assigned Parent Aide, Carrie, was an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), and part-time school bus driver in West Hartford.  About ten years later I ran into her again, driving my youngest son (now known as Dr. D. H. Raven, but that’s another story for another day) to school.  Over the weeks, and months, as DH’s wheelchair lift slowly ascended in the morning, and descended again in the afternoon, I learned that Carrie had come into Parent Aide Crisis Training after a few years of increasingly active involvement in a Man/Sha Design project run by a nun at a nearby parish.  That was a shocker!  “Did you say “Man/Sha?”

Yes, she said “Man/Sha” and then went on about her Team having successfully advocated with a woman whose daughter had been abused while in the foster care system.  Somewhat indirectly, in fact, the Parent Aide Crisis Program had grown out of that advocacy project, so Carrie was one of the more experienced Aides at the ripe old age of 21.

Who was this nun?

Carrie was an EMT instead of a police officer, her preference, because of a juvie history.  Although now married to a woman at least twice her age, Carrie, at age 16, was arrested for not calling DCF when she discovered her boyfriend was turning tricks with the baby in the room.  She didn’t feel like she had a lot of choice.  Either she looked the other way, or she couldn’t afford to feed the baby, much less herself.  But, the self-medication she could afford, crack, did not exactly influence the judge in her favor.

Now I’m trying to figure out how she got a job as a school bus driver, but I wasn’t about to complain.  One of the smartest, and wisest, 21 year olds I ever met.

She was great with Amy. Got her involved with a School Ally Project Team in the next neighborhood.  They took care of her, shared stories, eventually painted a mural of themselves painting a mural on the side of a grocery store in Hartford.  Very colorful, but a little scary.  They had these mural design apps that let them design as a Team.  I remember everybody on the team designed what their character in the mural would look like.  Some of them looked like themselves, some had on masks that made them look like somebody else, some had masks that made them look like caricatures of themselves.  It wasn’t something I could ride by casually during the daylight.  Always drew me in to the mural of the mural of the mural……

Chapter 5

“So here’s the thing, honey, while it’s not for everybody, being born again is actually a requirement to become a Man/Sha Elder.  But, born again in a Seasonal kind of way, more like a tree than a baptism.  Here, look at this, I think you’ll see the idea.”

A nondescript basic-copy-paper word-processed; certainly not more than 30 years old, but creased into quarters, and vaguely concave, frayed at the edges, revealed a short legend, more like a parable maybe; dense, very dense…

“Imagine that a leaf and a twig were having a conversation about life and mortality.  Do you think the twig would be so foolish as to correct the leaf’s belief that life and death are analogous to evolution and the “still-state”? Yet, for the leaf, separated from the twig and tree, life is but a season.  The tree’s season of development, of evolution, of life, spans many growing seasons, as a tree.  And many more, as part of the nutrient/boundary field of potential life, and uncertain  moments within time’s great and small transitions.”

I had tracked down the nun, who turns out not to be a nun, operating the Man/Sha Neighborhood Transformation Project out of this dark, damp, and yet dust-covered Catholic Church basement, in New Haven, of all places.  She said she had been expecting me, more with her eyes than what she said.  But Kathleen Brennan was no nun.  She was a Quaker.  I had known, and loved, her in Seminary.  But, she had died very quickly, and tragically young, before my mind could grasp that it might be possible that I could actually lose her sooner, rather than later.  Breast cancer.

Kathleen was immense!  I don’t mean corpulent, although she always wished she had been born into “slimmer genes.”  Kathleen was truly “Legend in her Own Time,” Transcendent, Communion of Saints while Alive, omnipotent.  I know it sounds totally disgusting, but, honestly, I would have drunk her pee if she had ever told me it would do me any good.  Immense!

She always said her story began in a way that is strikingly similar to the scenario Dr. R Norton had used to begin his final.  Kathleen had a high school sweetheart, but he was not a right guy for her as a pregnant Mom-to-be.  This proved to be too much for her Irish Catholic parents, perhaps in part, but unclear, because this baby looked more like Oprah than Kathleen.  So, Kathleen found a roommate willing to give her a large closet-sized room for her and the baby, in exchange for half of what she made working nearly full-time at WalMart, while she finished high school with her classmates in Hartford. She missed one day of school her senior year, when she gave birth to her daughter on a Friday about noon.

Her biggest problem was that she never had enough time with baby Katey.  A few hours on Wednesdays after school, when she also needed to catch up on homework, and a few hours on Saturday and Sunday evening, when she also needed to catch up on homework, or buy groceries. Her roommate was an exotic dancer gay boy, very smart, but when he graduated a couple years ahead of her he had no ambitions other than taking this standing offer to work at a strip club, pending his 18th birthday.  Weirdly enough, he was good at it and actually liked the job, having become something of a very minor local celebrity because he was extremely out about EVERYTHING (the word “closet” was not in his dictionary, as was apparent from the occasional brief look through his more expansive, but abundance-stressed, bedroom door) and radically political.
‘‘’0-Liver, with a zero.’  That was what he said when asked his name.  We used to have these intensely sophisticated conversations, sort of like an Andy Warhol salon, on an unusually good day, but we knew nearly nothing about each others’ lives.”

“When Katey grew legs that could walk, my parents, retired, not so happily, didn’t want to take care of her every Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday evening.  I couldn’t afford any more day care, so when Oliver offered to watch her on Mondays and Tuesdays, no charge, cause those evenings were just down time anyway, and Oliver seemed to like her, I couldn’t think of any better options.”

But, it turns out that among Oliver’s repertoire of skills was the occasional turning of tricks in that overstuffed bedroom.  Typically not on a Monday or Tuesday; but not every Tuesday was typical.

On the last Tuesday that Kathleen saw Katey for a good long time, at the day care center in her high school, during a hurried lunch, Oliver accepted an indecent offer, which admittedly included cash, but he would have done it for free, from a very hot guy who happened to be a friend of Oliver’s dad (who thought prison would be a better place for his son than hell, but he was OK if it was both so long as he had done everything he could to “shut down that little whore”) and an undercover police officer.

It seems that Dad, also a police officer in town, had missed at least one promotion due to his son’s notoriety, and Dad knew that Oliver had a sex-for-pay history, and Dad had learned that the same way everybody else in town had learned it, through an interview in the local paper. That was also how Dad had learned about the probability of finding at least a personal-use amount of marijuana in the apartment, back in those ancient times before marijuana was licensed for use by those who were HIV+., as was his son, which he also learned about in that same newspaper.  But, unlike the general public, Dad was fairly sure there was a toddler in that apartment on Monday and Tuesday evenings.  If he could get his son arrested for not only prostitution and drug possession, but also risk of injury to a minor, there was a much better chance of getting him incarcerated without a prior arrest history.  Then too there were a handful of loitering and public nuisance charges.

Dad’s first name was not Oliver, but his last name was Olivier.

Katey ended up getting two years in foster care for Oliver’s offense while Kathleen got probation, loss of job, loss of any parental support of any kind, chronic homelessness, and a propensity for both depression and self-medication—most anything that was free would suit her budget, if not her body.

Katey’s foster parents turned out to be a rather too earnest young couple, intent on bringing back the family farm, and the 1950s in general, if possible.  Seriously religious, with emphasis on the “serious.”  Katey turned out to be something of a free spirit under all that outrageously boisterous African-American hair, and the Department of Children and Family’s edict that we do not strike foster kids for any reason at any time did, after all, not really present a moral dilemma when the Holy Bible itself clearly said “Spare the rod, spoil the child.” Never mind that when their DCF trainer asked them to show her where it says that in the Bible, they couldn’t actually find it in the on-line Bible concordances.  So, Katey had the occasional slap upside the head, and perhaps more than her fair share of verbal abuse, but never a bruise or mark.  The closest thing to torture were the interminable Sundays at church, with the occasional slap upside the head, a rapidly-executed proficiency of her Sunday School Teacher that far exceeded her proficiency with rapidly concluding any boring thing she said.

Meanwhile Kathleen’s story begins in a homeless shelter for women about 30 miles away.  As she tells it, her story begins when she realizes that she is living in a shelter with seven other women, some with kids in tow, some not, but they all shared the same story.  They all had lost their kids by force at least once, and they had all lost their homes about the same time.  Some were moms re-united with kids, but without the resources to live independently, some were reduced to the bi-weekly, at best, supervised visit with their kids.  And those kids would never be released to their moms’ custody as long as they were living in a shelter.

It took Kathleen 15 months after she graduated from high school to get her Nurse’s Assistant Certification while working for minimum wage at a nursing home, and  then getting her Home Health Care Aide Certification, before she could scrape together a budget plan that would pass muster with the Judge, and get on the waiting list for a subsidized apartment so she could be re-united with Katey, assuming her urines were clean—which they always were from then on.

The immenseness of Kathleen emerges from nowhere during that 15 months.  One Saturday morning, the women were vigorously assaulting the shelter’s “Property Closet” with Kathleen in the lead.  The Property Closet is where all the women who had ever stayed there over the decades stored any excess baggage they couldn’t fit in two drawers or under half of a twin bottom-bunk bed.  Once a guest left, she had to come back for anything left in the Property Closet within 30 days, in theory.  In reality, she needed to come back before it got so hopelessly crammed that the current residents were allowed to go in and help themselves to what took on the dimensions of a treasure hunt.  By the end of the day there was a pile of trash, but only stuff that none of the eight residents wanted.  Everything else was re-bagged, largely as the property of a new owner, some of which would eventually move out with a current resident, to help establish a new home.

Later that same steamy Saturday in mid-June, Kathleen would be joining her classmates to graduate, and start her in-service training at the nursing home the next day.  She was on her way, which seemed auspicious as she turned the ancient lock on the Property Closet door.  On shelves along the left side of the windowless cavern, with one trembly and dusty bulb hanging over the center, were the bags of current residents and a couple more that had not yet hit their 30-day limit.  These were not for plunder, yet.  The remainder of the room was crammed with luggage, garbage bags, old sound systems, TVs, the occasional ironing board, unaccompanied (but carefully tagged) hair dryers, cosmetic bags, table lamps, and a wheelchair with a milk carton wired onto the back.

Kathleen was attracted to the wheelchair, inexplicably, and noted one battered manila folder in the makeshift shopping carton.  Lifting it out, in large red lettering, she read, “K. Please read enclosed and save for the Transliterator.”  So she did, and then she went to her Commencement feeling that life was about to commence.

The first of four documents was the only one that immediately resonated for her, so that was the one she pulled from the envelope for my perusal, rather than something more predictable like, for instance, explaining to me why she wasn’t dead, apparently.

Chapter 6

Kathleen had some kind of epiphany when she read about the leaf and the tree.  She identified with the leaf, and she did believe that life is an evolutionary process, or a dying process, and wanted to hope that the dying process might lead to a further evolution, of some kind.  So that was what she meant about needing to be “born again.”  But, her passion came out of the conviction that she was not the only leaf that was turning prematurely gray from grief.  And, if all the women at the shelter and most of the women and men in the Certified Nurses Aid on-the-job slave-labor training program at the nursing home had similar stories of loss and disappointment and, too often, despair winning out over any real hope for the long-term, for more than survival as a family, then she was living in a branch of her tree that was growing very neglected indeed.

And perhaps even abused.  She, and a few of her friends got to talking about the similarities in their stories.  While someone passing by their “Mothers 8 Mob” might have been struck by their racial and age diversity, and probably their sexual preference, and maybe even gender identity, they began to gain strength from their shared belief that the child and family welfare tree was remarkably hinky when confronted by limbs doing poorly.

They got their hands on a copy of R Martin’s “3-Scars History” and then they went political.  Rather than getting all stuck on being the victim of an abusive and judgmental system, they decided to put their money on economic self-interest.  So they found a Request for Proposals from the Children’s Bureau, #936.52 and asked the shelter and the nursing home to send it in as a partnership.  Neither Director, after reading what they had written was the least bit concerned that any grant would actually be forth-coming to do any such thing, so they easily agreed to submit it.  What they didn’t know was that the Mothers 8 slipped in a cover letter:

TO:  Children’s Bureau Director

FROM:  Mothers 8 Mob, Hartford, CT

We are eight moms, average age 31, with eight kids, age range 1 to 18.  All eight were forcibly removed from our arms, and continue to be each time we visit.  We want to talk to you about four of them.  But first, between the eight of us, we have 96 years of parenting experience, and only 24 of those years have been with the decided advantage of actually living with our kids, having an authoritative voice about what we think is in their best interests, and not one of those years with the financial support that has been offered to our kids’ foster parents, Parent Aides, therapists, Classroom Aides, Home Health Care Aides, Behaviorists, Respite Care Providers, Job Coaches, and In-Home Nurses.  Estimating what all that adds up to, it comes to an average of $85,000/year, per child, not including the cost for their regular pediatricians, specialists, copious quantities of psychotropic medications, emergency visits, hospitalizations, and juvenile justice interventions, of which there have been far too many. 

One of our daughters, O.,  is an 11-year-old, with mixed-race, Fetal Alcohol features, currently taking more psychotropics than Mom believes is good for her, but the girl’s psychiatrist and the girl’s school psychologist, and school Social Worker disagree with her.  O is dually-diagnosed with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Cerebral Palsy.  Her academic functional skills are at the first grade level, on average, where they have remained since she was seven or eight, when she was taken by DCF because Mom was homeless and reluctantly agreed that she had no means of supporting a child with obvious unmet medical needs.

O is highly stressed at school and home, a slow disintegrating trend since she lived with Mom, when she was not taking any meds, was highly stressed at school, and more moderately stressed when she was home, with no known food anxieties other than a tendency to hoard, no GI issues, no anomalous sleeping patterns. All that has changed, has gone in the wrong direction, for O.

Mom is nearly 40 with High-Functioning Autistic Spectrum Disorder.  In response to her daughter’s special needs, she “voluntarily” signed away her parental rights with a commitment from the Placement Planner that she would not be placed in a home with other kids or pets, and she would be placed in a Professional Parent program, with a primary care provider with Medically Complex Certification.  That did not happen.

D. is an African-American 18-year-old, with Attention Deficit Disorder, required to take 72 mg’s of stimulants every morning, at 200 pounds, who just “graduated” from high school with a 3rd grade reading and math level. He is part of the Great Majority of African-American males with only a high school diploma, chronically unemployed and sporadically short-term under-employed.  To date he has been unable to keep two jobs due to his IDEA-based self-empowerment and social justice agenda.  In other words, yes, he got the message from the feds that self-advocacy is his most important tool to successfully transition from school to workplace; but no, employers who are raking in federal and state workforce development grants to subsidize their businesses did not get that message. 

When he points out to his supervisor that the supervisor has not made appropriate adjustments for the disability population he is recruiting through the local Workforce Development Board, or the Rehabilitation Bureau, and, further, that this might be an actionable offense under the Disabilities Act, then he tends to be reminded that there are literally hundreds of others behind him, and would he mind very much voluntarily disappearing.  So much for human rights, much less for the beleaguered Disabilities Act.  It sounds, looks, smells like discrimination as well as exploitation, in that approximately half of his training/internship hours to date have paid absolutely nothing, and the other half comes out to something like $3.25/hour.

S. is a 16-year-old bisexual High-Functioning Asberger’s Gamer.  Although afraid to go to school, and to be out of the closet, he is also afraid of being victimized in his foster home, as has already occurred more than once.  It doesn’t really matter where he is; he doesn’t feel safe anywhere; has never really attached deeply to anyone.  That said, he is something of a Momma’s boy but does not trust her to have his best interests in mind.  He frequently reminds her that it is her selfishness and lack of intelligence that have put him at-risk.  S. is haunted by the sadness and misery of the world, and sees no hope.  He is at high-risk for self harm, paralyzed by despairing uncertainty, without hope that any decision will be adequate to his vocation.  Ripped from the arms of his Safe Harbor, it is difficult for him to see that he is not as alone as he thinks, and that his vocation is important, and unique to him, but also a part of a vocation that is shared by his global peers.  His job is to find ways to connect with them, and to help them connect with each other.

R., like all eight of our kids, is “Other” in the race column, at 15 he has no identified linguistic or signing capacity.  He is paraplegic, has seizure disorders, primary diagnosis is Cerebral Palsy, complicated by cognitive blindness.  R is unlikely to perceive other humans in the way most of us do.  Yet his willingness to participate in physical therapies remains significantly lower with any care-giver other than his own bio-mom.

The enclosed proposal was inspired by what our kids and the child welfare system have taught us.  It is written in response to your LOA #936.52.  Identified in this proposal, as project partners, are our homeless shelter (TC) and one of our healthcare employers (SCF).

We believe this “seeding” project would provide optimized short- and long-term social investment values by re-directing the child welfare system toward the combined strength of family and kinship support networks for our hurt kids.

Sincerely yours,

Kathleen Smyth, with and for the temporarily sheltered Mothers-8 Mob

ABSTRACT:

“Imagine that a leaf and a twig were having a conversation about life and mortality.  Do you think the twig would be so foolish as to correct the leaf’s belief that life and death are analogous to evolution and the “still-state”? Yet, for the leaf, separated from the twig and tree, life is but a season.  The tree’s season of development, of evolution, of life, spans many growing seasons, as a tree.  And many more, as part of the nutrient/boundary field of potential life, and potential moments of life.” (Man/Sha Legends) 

 

The proposed alternative child/family well-being system, designed to restore health to hurt kids, evolves from a Whole Systems/Permaculture analysis, that may most easily be summarized with an analogy.  In our analogy, youth in Connecticut are this season’s leaves on a shared tree, and the proposed child well-being alternative system is the entire twig-to-root tree system to which they are connected.  Our objective, targeted strategically to the most at-risk, most hurt, is to restore health to faltering kids by bringing them the richest nutrient support system possible, customized to the specific self-assessed needs of each individual, and each child’s family/kinship network. 

This hypothetical alternative delivery system is developed theoretically in this proposal, based on what TC and the SCF have learned from their system-involved and not system-involved kids; High-Functioning integrated (enjoy well-being), challenged (well-being is a struggle), and guarded (well-being is a hope).

During the first 9-months of this proposed 5-year alternative system development, TC and the SCF, with a wide range of other education, workforce, and health agencies serving kids, will fully resource a youth-led Well-Being System Development Project.  Fully resourcing a Design Team will include sharing this proposal, inviting participants to engage with the proposed model, and its underlying systems analysis. The 9-month Design Team Report will be written using an “interactive research” process (see www.wtgrantfoundation.org and “A New Role for CT Youth: Leaders of Social Change” at www.perrinfamilyfoundation.org), in keeping with optimized systems design, informed by evidence-based models, and will meet federal objectives for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) well-being permaculture standards.

Objectives/Need for Assistance

At the heart of the “Adoption Opportunities” authorizing legislation lies a deeply and broadly held concern of the American people that long-term well-being outcomes for system-involved youth (child welfare system, “CWS”, and juvenile justice, “JJS”) lag significantly behind those same outcomes for youth who have no CWS or JJS histories, whether adopted or aging-out within the CWS.  This is substantively reiterated in the Children’s Bureau RFP.  Economic analysis of outcomes-to-date, intended by the authorizing legislation, suggest that a national trend toward more investment in preserving at-risk children in stable home environments, “prevention” services, even at some expense to more traditional resources for  “protecting” children from high-risk environments, does show initial promise both for improving well-being outcomes and for longer-term cost containment.  At the same time, overall availability of funds for this authorizing legislation, and all child/family well-being federal legislation, is under increasing pressures caused by larger at-risk populations, economic downturns, unemployment, and socio-economic inequities/inefficiencies.

The State of Connecticut’s ongoing system improvement initiatives are best summarized with the Department of Children and Family’s (DCF) recently revised mission statement: “Working together with families and communities for children who are healthy, safe, smart and strong. All children and youth served by the Department will grow up healthy, safe and learning, and will experience success in and out of school. The Department will advance the special talents of the children it serves and offer opportunities for them to give back to the community.”  The new theme from the Commissioner Office, increasingly reiterated by the CT State Legislature, is a replacement of a “welfare” culture with a “well-being” culture of learning.

Six Cross-Cutting Themes:

  • A family-centered approach to all service delivery, reflected in development and implementation of a Strengthening Families Practice Model and the Differential Response System;
  • Trauma-informed practice as related to children and families but also to the workforce that serves them;
  • Application of the neuroscience of child and adolescent development to agency policy, practice and programs;
  • Development of stronger community partnerships;
  • Improvements in leadership, management, supervision and accountability; and
  • Establishment of a Department culture as a learning organization.

            (Commissioner Katz, DCF, Legislative Briefing, January 24, 2013)

 DCF’s current thematic investment in further developing as a “learning culture” is embedded in a political consensus that we want our service delivery systems to be fully accountable to the public, operating as public benefit corporations (“B-corporations”).  Because these are publicly-owned systems, we expect public accountability regarding public benefits that we all agree are in fact benefits, certainly inclusive of those receiving services.  To that end, we increasingly recognize that child and family well-being are best supported by sharing and working together creatively to fully develop, evolve, and reweave what has unraveled; learning how to do that as cost-effectively as possible.

  Our emergent economic hypothesis for public-sector system efficiencies is that our delivery systems work better when they are recognized as inter-connected; rather than as radically separate systems.  “Systems” mentioned on the very first page of the Commissioner’s Briefing include Differential Response, mental health, neural/cognitive, public administration, learning/education, children, families, social, and economic. It is only one logical step of generalization to more broadly hypothesize that population well-being, and then global well-being, is best supported by investing in healthy relationships between individuals, families, peer groups, public associations and departments, nations, and species; while disinvesting in the “business-as-usual” aspiration to grow competitive-based financial exchanges and non-cooperative services that do not meet CQI aspirations, and do not achieve our best long-term well-being outcomes.

 In keeping with the primary population target of this LOA, our service population definition is Connecticut children with identified well-being risks. 

According to the DCF Commissioner’s January 2013 Legislative Briefing Report:

  • DCF serves approximately 35,000 children and 15,000 families across its programs and mandated areas of service in the course of a year.
  • Approximately 14,000 cases are open on a given day.
  • Approximately 4,000 children are in some type of placement.
  • Approximately, 650 children receive voluntary services and are not committed to the Department. About 550 of these children are receiving services at home.
  • Adoptions were finalized for 435 children, and subsidized guardianships transferred for 264 children during SFY2012 (about 2% of total children served each year).

 Our largest challenge is poverty, including related issues such as power and communication marginalization, neglect, family unemployment, and increased health and development risks:

  •  The child poverty rate rose from 11 percent in 2007 to nearly 13 percent in 2010.
  • More than 128,000 Connecticut children live in food-insecure households.
  • Twenty-eight percent of Connecticut children have parents with no full-time, year-round employment.
  • Joblessness for 16- to 24-year-old black males has reached “Great Depression proportions.”

[Connecticut Commission on Children, 2011 Results-Based Accountability (RBA) Report & Annual Report]

A recently published study argues a strong positive correlation between the Great Recession of recent years and increasing rates of child abuse and neglect. 

 “After declining for many years in the United States, the searches that seem to have come from abuse victims themselves rose as soon as the Great Recession began. On weeks that unemployment claims rose, these searches rose as well.

Searches that appear to have originated with people who suspect abuse also provide evidence that the increase is caused by the economic downturn. Controlling for pre-recession rates and national trends, states that had comparatively suffered the most had increased search rates for child abuse and neglect. Each percentage point increase in the unemployment rate was associated with a 3 percent increase in the search rate for “child abuse” or “child neglect.” (Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, Ph.D., New York Times, Opinion, “How Googling Unmasks Child Abuse”)

 Poverty and marginalization are highly correlated, creating a well-being services delivery system that is disproportionately accessible to non-poor Caucasian and Asian-American children:

Compared with the White population in Connecticut, Blacks or African Americans were almost 3.6 times, American Indians or Alaska Natives about 3.3 times, Hispanics or Latinos about 4.7 times, and persons reporting “Some Other Race” about 5.4 times more likely to be living in poverty in 1999.

The infant mortality rate (IMR) is a key measure of population health status. Between 2001–2005, the Connecticut IMR was 5.9 deaths per 1,000 live births. During this time, the IMR for White infants was 3.9, while for Black or African American infants, the IMR was 13.0, and for Hispanics, it was 6.5 per 1,000 live births.

Hispanic women and Black women had the highest percentages of those with late or no prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy, at 23.6% and 21.8% of women, respectively. Black women had the highest percentage of low birth weight infants, at 12.9%, compared with 6.7% for White infants, 8.2% Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 8.5% for Hispanics.

During fiscal years 2000–2006, the number of preventable hospitalizations in Connecticut grew by nearly 4%. Racial and ethnic minority populations accounted for 100% of the growth in preventable hospitalizations between FYs 2000 and 2006, while preventable hospitalizations among Whites decreased 3% over this same time period. Hispanics and Blacks represented 44% and 31%, respectively, of the increase in preventable hospitalizations between FY2000 and FY2006.

(THE 2009 CONNECTICUT HEALTH DISPARITIES REPORT, Connecticut Department of Public Health)

There is considerable evidence that disrupting the primary caregiver relationship with a child, from birth through age 18, increases stress and results in challenges to well-being and healthy vocational choices.  This is poignantly so when that relationship is severed forcibly by the CWS.  The level of harm has repeatedly been identified through post traumatic stress disorder assessments, and the neural patterns of infants.  The “protection-over-prevention” orientation to delivering well-being services has proven to be toxic, as well as expensive.

TC and the SCF are proposing a youth-led plan to spread a “Well-Being System (WBS) Development Project” to all young people with communication and trauma related needs.  Starting with 80 system-involved, moderate- to high-risk of maltreatment, communication challenged and guarded, ADHD, and Autistic Spectrum sub-populations, and doubling that number each year for the subsequent four years, the WBS Development Project will include approximately 2,500 youth, ages 8 to 25.  Whole Systems Permaculture Design incorporates optimization values for replication and infrastructure capacity across state and national boundaries.  Seeding is local; replication potential is global.

Creating a more effective and equally accessible delivery system is not only a priority for the CWS, but also for beleaguered schools, health, and employment services.  Among the more prominent investors in systems change for pediatric mental health is the Connecticut Health Foundation.  Their Children’s Mental Health Initiative goal is to “support the infrastructure and capacity of local community collaboratives to ensure that services for children with severe mental health conditions are family-centered, community-based and culturally competent, and provide quality, evidence-based treatment.”

 

Three consistent objectives guided the initiative:

Improve the infrastructure (structure and processes) of community collaboratives to enable them to be system-change agents.

Improve local delivery of services for children with behavioral health problems by making them more family-friendly and culturally competent, and by using evidence-based services.

Increase parents’ participation in their children’s treatment planning and delivery processes.

To what extent did foundation-funded collaboratives engage in system building by implementing actions aimed at improving local delivery of services and increasing parents’ participation in their children’s treatment processes?

More foundation-funded collaboratives engaged in system building and expanded their repertoire of system-building actions during the initiative. A majority of foundation-funded collaboratives, however, struggled to engage in system-building actions. For example, few collaboratives engaged in systematic strategic planning to guide their system-building effort, and many actions were modest in scope and with limited results. Lastly, most actions implemented by foundation-funded collaboratives to increase parents’ participation in their children’s treatment processes focused on improving parents’ knowledge and skills, while a minority focused on making the service environments more family-friendly.

 (CT Health Foundation, “Children’s Mental Health Initiative” Report, 2008)

 Somewhat redundantly, the Perrin Family Foundation’s Report, (2012) “A New Role for CT Youth: Leaders of Social Change” begins The Next Steps section with:

 First, youth development agencies—and those that fund them—can prioritize engagement of youth voices and  foster youth-adult partnerships, create meaningful opportunities for shared decision making, and incorporate sociopolitical competency as a core youth development outcome. These shifts will enhance young people’s overall development by empowering young people to understand their own life experiences in the broader social and political context in which they exist. This exposure is particularly important during adolescence, as youth develop their identities and begin to formulate answers to tough questions: Who am I? What do I care about? What is fair? Which community or communities do I belong to? How do I view the world and why do others see it differently? What do I want to change? What role  can I play? Creating opportunities for youth to question the status quo, to think critically, and to become confident in decision-making roles helps pave the way for youth to become informed and  engaged community members. (p. 30)

 The proposed WBS Design intends to fully exploit the Transition Generation’s strong desire for authentic, honest, and just community-investment experiences, and the new “Collaborative Economy” rooted in people doing things for themselves together, in communications-resourced, diversely populated, intentional kinship groups.  We fully anticipate that this Generation will bring new meaning to the term “system-involved kids.”  Their self-help system will identify unprecedented potential for replication, sharing information and services via Internet networks. Their work on a permaculture[1] system, rooted in mutual respect and understanding, will enable transformational, yet individual and community-based, peer-to-peer dynamics.  Their shared system design objective is to achieve long-term, sustainable well-being outcomes of global significance to marginalized and hurt kids and families.

 The current population under 18 may be the first generation whose kids are born with survival risks including thirst and starvation.  (www.epa.gov/climatechange, http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook). This century will use the last of the fossil-fuel deposits, and our kids will continue transitioning to an information-based economy.  The social structures, including family and child welfare systems, most practitioners and program developers assumed as permanent will each dramatically evolve.

The WBS Design Project intends a transition to a culture of listening and caring with this Transition Generation. The first nine months ask questions, listening carefully for what we agree we will need for our future well-being, how we agree practitioners might help resource our self-help goals.  What exactly does our inclusive, sustainable well-being community look like?  How do we imagine our futures, and why? How do we think we can learn to learn together, given global technological and communication resources, and increasing neural-diversity?  How can our WBS Design help us give voice, and all forms of expression, to the wisdom we share?

This Generation will see a transition from an energy-based economy, to an information-based species.  From an evolutionary history perspective, this may be a level of transition that we have not seen since the domestic use of fire.  Or, it may be something more mundane, a level of transition not seen since the Industrial Revolution.  With 20% of our kids now having mental health issues, with a trend that projects as few as 60% of our kids graduating from high school, with the doubling of High-Functioning Autistic Spectrum  and Attention Deficit in recent years, we need to listen, and then implement together.

 We believe that, so long as we work in a learning partnership with this Transitional Generation, adopted or not, socially guarded or not, behaviorally challenged or not, highly stressed or at-risk of identity loss and hopelessness, GLBTQI or any of the other polyphonic labels of diversity and segregation, or not, we will find bountiful and sustainable resources to do everything we need to do, to be everywhere we need to be, to be that well-being community for every child, and every child’s child.

 

Approach

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.  To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”  R. Buckminster Fuller

 Our permaculture model of systems change includes a forest of interrelationships.  However, the basic proposed logic structure of relationships has four parts:

1.      Nutrient soil:  Evidence-based precedents within the existing CWS.     

2.      Seed-to-Tree Developing Delivery System: Well-Being System Design/Development Project.

3.      Leaves/Ornamentals:  At-Risk Transition Generation: Highest Risk Harbingers of needed change—kids with communication and relational anomalies.

4.      Air/Atmosphere Ecosystem: “Real” and “Virtual” Time communication systems.

Goal:  To design and develop a self-resourcing and self-perpetuating, nutrient-rich, inclusive Well-Being System powerful enough to efficaciously recommend that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services be re-named as The Department of Well-Being Services.

Chapter 6

“Kathleen, I’ve dreamed of being with you again, but didn’t think it possible, due to your untimely death and all.  You look radiantly happy.  The white hair suits you.  So I’m thinking this has something to do with your “born again” position, but that’s all I’m coming up with.  And you switched from the Quakers to the Catholics?  Really?  Who does that?”

“No, no.  The kids call me “Sister” because they assume I am a nun, but I’m still a Quaker, or a Polypath; but mainly associate with the Man/Sha Tribe; kindofa cross between Unitarians and Zen Buddhists and Taoists and Nature-Spirit Aboriginals.”

“And as for being Kathleen reborn, that’s only partially accurate I think.  The Kathleen you and I love is my younger sister.  You may remember her mentioning an older sister, special ed teacher, Director of Religious Education, Katey.  Kathleen named her daughter after me.  In fact Katey lives with me now, or she has a room, still, and occasionally uses it when she’s not at MIT; math major.  Something about spatial/temporal algorithms for nonrobotics ecotherapy.”

“It doesn’t seem like Katey could be old enough for MIT.”

“It’s her first year, and she went in home-schooled in math and robotics, at 17.  Produced some outrageously high SAT scores at 16, but they wanted her to take some of their on-line classes until her 17th birthday.  So she started right after her birthday, in January, and decided to stay for a summer internship with a local robotics company; developing therapeutic software for Oppositional Communicators.”

It seemed to me that I had met far more than my fair share of “Oppositional Communicators,” but, not knowing how she meant that term, I was about to ask when she said she didn’t have long, and she had a rather lot to pass on to me.

The Man/Sha Elders Council has left this packet for you, for the past, toward the future.  You are to seed its ingredients locally, for global replication.

This is your Man/Sha Transliteration Vocation Design Plan.  It is somewhat ageless and includes Figure 209.03, from R. Fuller’s “Synergetics,” a Creative Systems Design Values Chart, and a CND Universal Vector Temporal Relationship Map.

You will be called to Man/Sha Youth Ministry before the oldest of the TransGeneration turn 18.  If you listen to them with the ears of an Elder, they will teach you how to connect the Map to the Chart.  This is their shared chapter in the Man/Sha Legends; it will map onto the existing Legends.  Our Tribal future, more specifically, the globally networked Transliteration Generation, is in their Reweaving hearts and minds.

Chapter 7

Katey-Katherine (“K²”), like Catherine the Greater, and Carrie, spoke very precisely.  It would have been coldly bionic if not tempered by their serene demeanor.  They were at peace with what they knew, and understood that, in the big picture, everything would come out for the best.  Very high up in the “Nurturer” scale.  But really intense when they got into this whole “I have a message from” business, perhaps just to let you know that you should pay attention.  I found myself taking notes, capturing words and patterns.  Much later the Transition Generation taught me how to use these notes for Permaculture Systems Design (PSD), the forerunner of Cooperative Nutritional Design (CND).

K² went on somewhat more conversationally about why the Elders wanted to know if I was interested in being a parent; which I was.  Given my interest, K² recommended I begin adopting when I felt ready, but before further advancing into “decrepitude.”

Anticipating my “why,” she said that I should learn to become an effective parent to the Transition Generation (“0-Geners”) before attempting to minister to other people’s needs.

Anticipating my “why,” K² gave me one of her best belly-laughs ever, “No, not because you need to be the ‘pastor’ of ‘sheep,’ but because you will learn that an effective parent for kids with special challenges (and what kid doesn’t have those!) requires learning to be a nurturing administrator for trans-geneformational relationships.  That’s what good youth ministers have to be good at.”

Continuing to be confused by these Elder messages from an uncertain, but apparently prophetic, future, the best I could come up with was “Trans-geneformational?”

“Read Lewis Carroll’s chapter on Humpty Dumpty.  He will teach you something about language, bilateral communication, ecologic, and exegesis.”  And with that, she turned her attention to a rather insistent rather squeaky squirrel of a girl who looked like she needed to use the bathroom but repeatedly demanded food, or maybe it was just attention, another form of light.

 

Chapter 8

That was the last Man/Sha message I ever received, as such.  During the intervening decades I adopted Sir Loyal Heart who developed an affinity for cob and straw bale construction, and became the primary guardian for Dr. D Raven, his youngest brother.  “D” is one of the Universal Channels of non-linguistic human spirituality.  The twins, Yang and Yin, came along between Loyal and D.  These guys became a Cyber-Wizard Team, and were instrumental in completing the global cooperative network preparations for their kids, the Transposition Generation.  Sr. Fetal Squirrel came along last, something of a spontaneous surprise as compared to her brothers.  Looking back on it now, I can see that our family needed an obsessive-yang spirit to bring equilibrium to D’s pervasive-yin.  It was their equilibrium that catapulted my learning curve toward the Transition Generation Home/School ecoministry cooperative.

My gradual unfolding toward a specific call to join the growing Home/School ecoministry culminated at the top of Cider Hill one gusty and rainy Saturday morning in August.  I was rather frantically riding my bike up a deserted dirt private road, overgrown on both sides with a trace of original New England forest, on what used to be a large summer farm estate.  The largely abandoned farm road had become a destination of sorts, about the right distance from our house to feel like a good workout and getting away for some brief moments of solitude.  The Cider Hill drive shot up rather steeply about a third of the way down the dead end road.  By the time I had biked that far, I had, until now, insufficient curiosity to take on the 1st-gear challenge.  And, too, it was marked “Private Road,” although I had never seen anyone entering or leaving.

Two days before, talking to Rev. Harry, an old soul-mate, he had told me that there was, still standing, an old  summer house, and two or three guest houses.  On this particular August Saturday I had ventured into the rain more fiercely than peacefully, more escaping than moving toward any destination, resisting what I greatly feared was the final vocational calling predicted so long ago by my friend the Owl.  Over the past few weeks I had sensed that something, again, was “different” about me, or about us, or about everything, really.  My dreams and my days were fusing.

Katey and Catherine the Greater and I were informally, and disjointedly, trying to talk to each other about a new type of local Home School ministry that would be globally networked.  I was attracted to the idea spiritually and intellectually, but emotionally I longed for a deep and lasting solitude.  The day before, a Friday, Katey had, gently, reminded me that her UU community was preparing to call a full-time minister; maybe it was time.  Loyal had just graduated from high school.  I had just passed 40. My heart froze.  I must have looked like a deer caught in the headlights because she just gently rubbed my back as I turned to leave.

It made sense, from what little I knew of her community, and their accessibility to the local Seminary.  In my head I could see why I was being called to become a Candidate, but my longing for privacy and solitude pulled me into a grain of irritated attention.

As I downshifted into the lowest gear of Loyal’s old mountain bike, time slowed down.  I passed through a membrane of memory about a Shaker legend that they would be reborn when a long-lost sapphire pearl stone would be re-discovered at the top of a sacred hill.  At the top of Cider Hill, as the grade eased, I too eased into the wonder-filled discovery of three log cabins, and a log-built, rustic summer house, with leaky, moldy roofs swept by the gentle brush of tree limbs.  This was exactly what we needed as a base for our first straw bale and cob natural construction school, and residences for our first generation of the Permaculture Home/School Aides.

Without forethought, without realizing that I was gently braking back down Cider Hill, I began to transpose my longing for solitude into a longing for intimately intellectual community; what Tom Atlee, et. al. call “Co-Intelligence,” maybe, but what Atlee and Rumi and Katey and Catherine experience as Trans-Intelligence–the profound difference between loving to learn together, and learning to love to learn together.  This School, and this place, would be a place for learning to love to learn eco-mentoring, and that was precisely the sapphire/pearl I had come there to find.  By the time I arrived, as if by magic, back at my own drive, all the separate pieces of the design Katey and Catherine and I had been puzzling emerged into one coherent moment; and I found peace with my vocational piece.

 

Katey, Catherine and I, and many more family, friends, allies, colleagues, began the first pilot classes within a year after that, wrapped into a detailed interactive research structure, meeting federal CQI standards for well-being systems change.  Revenue was never a problem.  No one was ever denied access for lack of money; although the majority of kids that we would have liked to include in that first couple of years were denied because of our strict family-inclusion requirement.  Only later were we able to relax that structure, as we developed a richer network of Transition Generation leaders.

Meanwhile, we found a couple of Man/Sha natural builders willing to re-establish a Shaker-style craft apprentice system.  They refurbished the Cider Hill buildings, and six clustered farm-hand cottages about a quarter mile away, at the end of the farm road. using a combination of straw, cob, plaster, built-in stoves, and solar-panel roofs.  Those were two of the earliest 0-footprint rehab projects in Connecticut.  While the first Permaculture Aides, typically diagnosed with High-Functioning Autism and Schizophrenia, moved into Cider Hill, the Farm Cottage Cooperative Community filled up with at-risk families, referred by various State Social Workers.  The kids, and many of their young-adult parents, grew up in the Home/School classrooms on the other side of the road.  They, in turn, became multi-generational Aides and Transition leaders for Permaculture Teams, locally, then regionally.  Carrie facilitated the first Farm Cottage Permaculture Project Team.

Amy seemed to be everywhere.  With the Mural Design Teams she first painted the exterior of our UU building, then proceeded to creatively assault most any cement block and stucco exterior surface in Hartford through Simsbury.  That led to her becoming a skilled Natural Construction Apprentice, then Teacher.  Then she became interested in the Permaculture Landscape Design Trade, so she could integrate her beautifully painted cob architecture with edible permaculture-designed plantings.  Eventually she taught Transpositional Permaculture for the Seminary’s global network classes.  It was difficult to remember she was the weepy “Andy/Amy”, persuaded this world had no place for her, waiting for a ride to nowhere on a hot July driveway so very long ago.


[1] Permaculture is whole systems design that develops long-term sustainable sub-systems (e.g. schools) informed by dense, diverse, inclusive, and nurturing ecosystems.  As Rob Hopkins, in “The Transition Companion: Making your community more resilient in uncertain times” observes, “Permaculture is a design ‘glue’ to stick together all the elements for a sustainable and resilient culture.  The elements such a culture will depend on include local food production, energy generation,…meaningful employment, and so on.  Permaculture helps assemble those things in the best way possible.  It has been described as ‘the art of maximizing beneficial relationships’.” (p. 98)

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Reducing Poverty by Increasing Sustainability and Justice

There are three human-species level “scars” resulting from the de-valuation of women, intrinsic to the development of science as deductive specialization, industrialization, imperialism, and capitalism:

Scar 1: The de-valuation and displacement of aboriginal communities, discounted as un-civilized.  The cultural normalization of “empire-building” was at the cost of active disdain for women-led internal civic cultures in organically balanced communities.

Scar 2: Slavery was, and remains, the male-dominated ownership of de-valued aboriginal and organically-based human communities, later reduced to individual victims, usually women, disrupted by force and used as fuel for commerce.

Scar 3: The emergence of post-industrialized “child welfare” systems de-valued the relationship between our species’ nurturers and their children. The taken-by-force disruption of families is a recent artifact of so-called “civilized” societies and an act so blind to the intrinsic value of the caregiver/child relationship that it is unknown within healthy tribal communities.

These three “Species Scars” are driving forces to what David Korten and others call “The Great Turning.”

We are an industrializing species that has de-valued nurturing and care-giving to such an extreme imbalance that we actually call the deliberate disruption of dysfunctional families “child welfare;” although this is currently trending toward child “well-being.”  Mounting scientific evidence, including neurological, cognitive, learning theory, psychological, sociological, and economic, reveal that severing the primary caregiver/child attachment bond is an injustice, usually to women, and always to children, in every industrialized society on the planet. Disrupting families is intrinsically harmful to both children and primary caregivers with life-long sub-optimization repercussions for themselves, and often for those around them.  In the U.S., and in Connecticut, more specifically, we are seeing a rapid transition from a short-term outcome policy monopoly, the “child welfare” system, to a long- and short-term outcome paradigm, the child well-being system (https://www.childwelfare.gov/well-being/).

The core of child well-being policy, including the recruitment and training of care-providers for special needs kids, would optimize wellness outcomes by giving consistent priority to re-investing in the primordial relationships within families, regardless of dysfunction/disabilities. In this policy context, the relationships of greatest consideration are those between caregiver and children. Nurturing caregiver/child relationships is essential bedrock for optimizing wellness outcomes. This suggests moving in the direction of “zero-tolerance” for the disruption of families. What might this look like?

When neglect/abuse is confirmed, the child-specific training and resources that are currently invested in recruiting alternative caregivers would, instead, be invested within the family, without disruption. Where criminal intent is a factor, well-trained mentors would be introduced into the family environment, beginning with emergency support and sustained through the crisis, gradually withdrawing in-home support as wellness develops and becomes self-sustaining.  This form of intervention is largely presaged by the evidence-based “Homebuilders” program (http://www.cebc4cw.org/program/homebuilders/).

The large majority of traumatizing disruptions pertaining to the challenges of raising kids, especially special needs kids, are economically related. That is, if the same level of public-dollar support for at-risk/neglected children were available to the primary caregivers (often bio-parents, but not always), perhaps as administered by a Parent Mentor on a transitional basis, remaining needs could be addressed through family skills-training. “Child-specific” training is already standard operating procedure for foster care providers committing to a special needs child. Under the scenario of children remaining with their currently dysfunctional parents, any child-specific training that a Parent Mentor would require would be simultaneously delivered to the bio-parents, as a transitional team.

Community-based Family Intervention Therapy:  Creating Sustainable Well-Being Community Project Teams

Part of any dysfunctional family intervention plan could include their joining, or starting, a multi-generational “sustainable well-being community” Project Team, composed of family, friends, neighbors, but also seeded to assure cohesive potential and the development of inclusively effective communication skills. Advantages are particularly acute for families that include special needs kids. With 20% of our kids now having mental health issues, with a trend that projects as few as 60% of our kids graduating from high school, with the doubling of High-Functioning Autistic Spectrum and Attention Deficit in recent years, perhaps optimized family therapy design should begin operating under the reasoned assumption that all kids are at-risk, and the entire generation under 18 might best be thought of as a Transitional Generation.  The end of the fossil-fuel economic base, with concomitant environmental challenges, and the burgeoning information-based economy are highly relevant to projects aspiring to create well-being environments WITH young people, and future generations after them.

Multi-generational Project Teams could have self-advocacy, STEM, environmental, financial literacy, planning skills, budgeting, nutrition, and other potential well-being outcomes at the individual, family, and community levels.

Enhanced stability and reduced volatility optimally improve long-term academic, social, health, and economic prospects.  Regardless of the category of caregiver services delivered, it is the enhancement of affectively confluent living and learning environments that most efficaciously improves long-term outcomes.  This has been demonstrated through empirical studies at Yale University (see especially Aaron Antonovsky, salutogenetic effect in the medical sociology literature); Harvard University (see especially Shawn Achor, Positive Psychology in their Psychology Department); and the primary efficiency of retaining richly-confluent (low stress) inductive triggers in the affective neural network to optimize learning in the Universal Design for Learning (UDL, www.cast.org).

For an interesting and practical synergetic model to help achieve long-term sustainable outcomes for at-risk kids and families, with inclusive and emergent benefits for local community and bio-regional systems, see www.socialcommunicationfoundation.org.

As a program development Thought Experiment, imagine that Connecticut had , in addition to the current menu of excellent child well-being programs and services, state-wide outcomes you might realistically hope for from a youth-led “Well-being Development Corp.”  This Development Corp might be associated with the Department of Children and Families, an existing state-wide DCF contractor, or child advocate office, as an affiliated partnership, with its own Advisory Board, to include at least 50% High Functioning Socially Challenged young people, up to age 30.  The Development Corp’s responsibility is to resource Sustainable Well-being Community Project Teams, as outlined above, but also as volunteer sprouts.

For example, within the past three months I have talked informally to individuals, ages 11 to 60, interested in well-being community projects including converting suburban/urban commercial and residential acreage to organic edible and ornamental garden landscapes, saturating a metropolitan region with murals covering cinder-block exteriors, developing a High-Functioning Challenged Communicator STEM Learning Center, designing gaming apps for edible landscape and mural design, creating an on-line gaming/networking state-wide hub for connecting well-being community projects into a synergetic whole.   “Resourcing” Well-being Community Project Teams would include:

Short-term therapeutic facilitation for building inclusive project teams.  Facilitators would be skilled in effective communication across the great socially-challenged v. socially-integrated boundary.  This is an essential first step to optimize a mutual learning group (and family) culture.

Project design and implementation technical support.

Project financial training and budgeting.

Project development training:

  • Business/entrepreneurial/community development and organizing/ skill sets,
  • Philanthropic research, planning, and revenue projection,
  • Grant/Investment proposal writing, including financials,
  • Social/environmental/economic short- and long-term outcome measurement and reporting.

Results Based Accountability (RBA) reporting and CQI analysis.

Sweeping Team Project leaders into the Well-being Development Corp’s multi-project resourcing system, and as Advisory Board members.  This could emerge as an AmeriCorp funded employment site.

RBA trend analysis could culminate with at least annual theoretical and policy implications for local and global sustainable long-term wellbeing, to include

  • learning systems design and technology,
  • environmental, economic, health, education, and family well-being support systems.

Education and advocacy networking, as necessary, informed by the Well-Being Development Corp’s RBA trend analysis.

Financial Implications

Short-term Revenue Prospects:

Any list of prospects cannot be both concise and exhaustive.  There are many potential in-state and national first-tier prospects:  youth , workforce, and economic development; socially challenged technological and other therapeutic interventions; child, family, community well-being; and STEM learning facilitation.  Smaller, and with long-term trends predicted to go downward, revenue potential comes from the in-state private sector.  Larger, and more resilient, funding prospects are national, including private and public sectors.  Looking only at the national public sector, germane grant programs are easily, even somewhat redundantly, found with the National Science Foundation, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  Again, this list is not intended to be inclusive, although the National Science Foundation may be construed to include the others mentioned, and several more.

Long-term Revenue Prospects:

Re-investing in the primary caregiver/child relationship could re-direct dollars from the following federal and state expenditures, with a slow, long-term trend of decreasing cash outlay, in contrast to the current faster trend upward:

Current systems experiments with Medicaid and CHIP, inspired by prevention and well-being outcome improvement (e.g. Health Care Round Two Innovation Grants), could lead to a much more long-term perspective on the prudent use of insurance reimbursement.

School nurse positions could be paid through CHIP/ Medicaid/private insurance to function as the health and wellness case manager for not only the children in the school, but for their family units as well.

Insurance paid school-based nursing could include supervision of primary caregivers choosing to provide their own in-home health care to their medically complex and special needs dependents.  To illustrate, instead of paying $30/hour for a nurse to monitor/medicate my son for 40 hours/week, Medicaid could pay me $12/hour for 40 hours to monitor/medicate my son, with monthly on-site supervision through the school nurse Medical Home service.  Both short- and long-term health outcomes optimize when primary caregivers choose to provide their own medically-supervised family prevention and maintenance care.  For lower-income caregivers, the option of $12/hour for self-care, rather than bringing in a home health-care aide, could make it economically feasible to choose the self-care option.  Further, it would be interesting to know how many home health-care aides are leaving their own medically complex dependents, young and old, to take care of other people’s dependents, only because the current home-care services discriminate against self-provider care.

Medicaid/CHIP/private insurance reimbursement to the agencies of Social Workers serving at-risk kids, needing tangible goods for their well-being, such as school uniforms, backpacks, school supplies, summer/after-school enrichment, beds, toiletries; all on a last-resort basis.  Covenant to Care for Children’s 26 years of experience with providing these goods through at-risk kids’ Social Workers (in child welfare, school, hospital, community-based agencies) amply demonstrates that guaranteeing every child, at all times, what is needed for well-being and full development costs pennies on the long-term dollar, even when outcomes are compared only at the individual level (omitting spin-off values at the family, community, social, and global levels).

For families that choose homeschooling, sharing savings to the school system with the family would reduce overall costs of public education, environmental costs for transportation and building large, burgeoning school structures.  Homeschooling also improves learning outcomes, and perhaps long-term resiliency, for the entire family.  With fingertip access to a wealth of information and cultural expression from across the planet and universe unsurpassed by the best universities in the world twenty-five years ago, and the rich social/cultural development of homeschooling networks,  the arguments against this huge financial savings become more anemic with each passing month.  At least for lower-income caregivers, shared savings to the school system are a re-investment in a household economy that will promote higher well-being and learning for the entire family unit.

Extensive research points to the enormous cost, and lack of wellness, resulting from the break-up of caregiver/child relationships. When neglect/abuse is confirmed, the child-specific training and resources that are currently invested in recruiting alternative caregivers would, instead, be invested within the family, without disruption.  To ensure, and optimize, the well-being of vulnerable children and families requires a system adaptation that does not itself cause negative experiences that “color how future experiences are understood” (from the DHHS Request for Proposals, p. 2, Diligent Recruitment of Families for Children in the Foster Care System).  Programs like Homebuilders, and many more well-being preservation program designs, if fully optimized over the long-term, are predicted to result in more temporary crisis-intensive expenses rather than long-term subsidies.  Further, long-term special needs support would more cost-effectively benefit high-risk families, rather than a foster-care provider.

Diligent efforts to bring limited child welfare resources into high-risk families, without disruption, also responds to civil rights and justice concerns.  The Multi-Ethnic Placement Act (MEPA) explicitly prohibits a discriminatory fee structure.  The existing foster care recruitment paradigm provides remuneration that is made available to any qualifying adult except the current caregivers, despite any evidence that this same level of remuneration would significantly change the well-being potential for the intact family. This looks like a class action suit waiting to happen, and legal wrangling has demonstrated a profound inability to optimize long-term sustainable well-being outcomes.  It is to be avoided, especially when there is a cost-effective alternative immediately at hand.

Communication and Well-being System Design

This all reminds me more than just a little bit of Robert Norton and David Brenders enthymematic perspective, in Communication & Consequences:  Laws of Interaction, 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  Norton was my Honors Thesis Advisor at the University of Michigan, now happily and privately consulting in Australia.  Sometimes when I listen to Catherine Hogan talk about her “Inclusion Teaming” process, I wonder what would happen if every kid grew up in a family with adults that learned, and practiced, the principles of enthymematic communication.  Perhaps my sustainable well-being community would have already arrived, wherever I choose to live.

Standard
Uncategorized

Notes from, and to, a Grant Writer

Philanthropy is a peculiar form of social investment.  Those of us who have spent many years in this form of human industry often wonder if there is not some better, more humane, more efficient, more hopeful, even more peaceful way to do it.  The following correlated notes to philanthropists, non-profit leaders, researchers, and myself come from what I have learned so far:

To Philanthropists, cc Non-Profit Leaders:

If you are reading a grant proposal written in a grant writer’s office, using language chosen solely by that writer, then stop reading it.

If you are having a proposal review meeting with only paid non-profit staff in the room, walk out.

If you are reading a grant report written by a grant manager, paid by the grantee, using language and metrics chosen solely by that manager, throw it away and make no further investments in that direction.

To Grant Prospect Researchers, cc Non-Profit Leaders:

When you are researching grant prospects, give the highest priority to a direct match in terms of community of intent; the same territory and the same priority for change or maintenance. Avoid those prospects that are not clear about this.  They are, at best, your second-tier prospects because people who really enjoy investing in people give to specific people for specific priorities.

Give third priority to prospects that would be willing to read a proposal, attend a follow-up meeting, and accept a report written solely by and with you and your paid staff, using only internally chosen language and metrics.  People who enjoy investing in people are more likely to give effectively and with great resilience over the long-term.  It is unlikely that investors and investments will build mutually enriching relationships without inclusive communication.

To Myself, cc Non-Profit Human Resource Leaders:

Never write a grant proposal for those who would presumably benefit from a grant; always write proposals with prospective beneficiaries.

Never write a proposal or report that is not part of an intentional and inclusively evolving system: primary constituency, non-profit administration, and the reader(s).

Never work for anybody; always work with prospective beneficiaries, project/program executives, and those who are responsible for wealth investments.  You are the translator across paradigms; not the fundraiser.

Never forget we are all in this together, however difficult it is to remember that some days.

Standard