Bucky:

Why didn’t you remind people

that relativity of spacetime relationship

is double-bound and fractally rhythmed

under he Commons Metric Assumption

of 3 spatial and 1 bilateral progenitive time dimension

equals a Zero-Moment spacetime-centric

balancing thermodynamic theory?

Einstein:

Why didn’t you choose my word “relativity”

rather than your more positive-slanted “synergy”

in your geometrics of universal consciousness?

Bucky:

Eulerian prime relationality is midway positive

but also double-knotted and fractal negative,

as convex-within.

If Synergetics has a positive stance,

it may also be true

that “relativity” has a negatively-reductive slant.

Zero-Core Concave/Convex Universe

as Prime Relationship

feels more nondually transparent

than a Universal Theory of Relativity…

but, oh yes, by the way,

this Relativity of space and time story

takes place

within our shared assumption

of 4 equidimensional dynamics

as Prime Fractal SpaceTime Relationship.

Einstein:

I don’t recall saying anything about fractals,

although I did stipulate a 3-Space and 1-Time

Universe

as we know it in human-consciousness.

Bucky:

But c-squared begins with a fractal.

Square roots

regenerate metric-logical fractals.

To commodify the speed of light’s 0-Core Time

as “c-squared”

is to point directly at Bohm’s Implicate Order

of fractal form and functional dynamic syntax

st-ringing theory.

Einstein:

You think too much in ecologic.

Math and physics

boil and toil and trouble

more inclusively as Group Theory.

Bucky:

Well,

have you been following what Thurston

and Perelman

and those folks

have been saying

about the double-elliptical binding 0-soul core

of any integrative,

confluent,

and logically possible,

rational system?

Einstein: No, zero is much too small

to timelessly hold

my eternally universal interest.

Bucky:

Not that I always need the last word

but zero is also much too timeless

to share your expansive consciousness.

Einstein:

Hah!

That was a good one.