Uncategorized

Love’s Constant Complexity

Interesting
that Christian theologians
have traditionally agreed
God is unchanging

Because steadfast in love,
loyal in omnipresence,
faithful to omnipotent powers,
all with regenerative intent.

Yet Eastern philosophers
look at these same healthy
safe
empowering traits of Earth’s complex
cooperative
regenerate nature,
and see,
and/or hear,
organically sense,
this universal enlightenment
unveils a metaphysical reality
of sacredly relentless Change.

God is as unchanging
as transient thoughts
and feelings of complex compassion,
responding to Nature’s strength
through flexibility,
unconstant evolution
through constant revolutions of Earth
and all Her interdependent Tribes,
Forms,
Functions,
Flow.

Western patriarchal
capitalistic concern
about a changing God of love
and retributive justice
and unEarthly peace
in a rapturous Heavenly future
may include issues of confusion,
miscommunication
between Nature’s complex cooperative Relationality,
and secular Theories of Relativity.

If everything is relative
to everything else,
then morality,
health,
safety of unchanging natural
and spiritual principles
become shifty,
unreliable,
unpredictable,
potentially dissonant,
evil,
degenerative,
pathological,
dissociative,
terrifying,
terrible
more than terrifically co-relational,
cooperative,
loving,
uniting through mutual flexibility
more than uniform
through unchanging orthodoxy.

But, Eastern nondualistic theory
is rooted in multicultural nonviolent experience
of fluid Relationality,
compassionate cooperativity
of constant win/win healthy natural change
which does not suggest nihilistic chaos
of space v time
or mass v energy

Instead,
constant nuanced regenerative relationship
of time equals space-cubed proportionality,

Zero polyphonic energy
regenerating One
polypathic co-relational Universe

Naturally within
and spiritually surrounding
Earth’s constant/correlative
enlightening co-empowerment.

Standard
Uncategorized

Power of Compassion

Most Republicans I’ve had the admittedly too infrequent pleasure
of listening to
assume financial wealth
is a greater public responsibility
and opportunity
than very much secondary social wealth
of healthy relationships,
resonant and democratically inclusive resilience.

And, Green Democrats
seem to share a world view
giving primal priority to values of social wealth,
multicultural co-investment
in people,
plants,
planetary inter-relationships,
global compassion.

So, a simple Thought Experiment
in competitive v cooperative relationality:

Imagine you are the ultimate capitalist success story
Playing a zero-sum win/lose game,
you always win,
so everybody else loses.
Eventually all financial assets,
natural resources,
human resources,
belong to you.
There remains no financial competitor left standing.
You are Earth’s omnipotent predator
of all economic value.

What happens to the value
of your capital liquid assets
at the moment you achieve
your perfect monopolistic success?
a perfect vacuum of other economic competitors?

Now, imagine social relationships
are our root source of value.

You develop cooperative relationships
that branch out into a global nurturing
and mutually nutritious network
of co-empowering healthy communication
until, finally, no one stands outside
your robust caring cooperative,
your multiculturally resonant social system.

At the exact moment of perfect synergetic interdependence,
when loneliness,
segregation,
distrust,
apartheid,
dissociation,
antagonistic lack of peaceful relationship
is nothing more than a pre-millennial memory,
what remains of your social,
multicultural
political
and cooperative economic value?

How would you ever finish spending
and extending
your social capital co-investments?

So, when Republicans
and not-so-Green Democrats
sternly inform me
We need a solid Business Model
for a robust and resilient government
and for perpetual economic growth,
I am always curious to learn
which Business Model they have in mind,

Competitive win/lose? Like capitalism,
Or cooperative win/win?
Like sacred Earth communion.

Standard
Uncategorized

Undifference

Indifference, if neutral,
is not hostile or inviting.

Indifference of nature,
like indifferent sages,
need not favor warriors detached from winning health
nor degenerative losing trends against healthy wealth,
cast in our ‘hollow reed’ self-neutral image
of empty potential godliness,
pure omnipresent transparency,
divine polypathic integrity
potential of reversed detachment.

This left-hemisphere indifference
allied with right-integral feeling,
so prominent in Buddhist and Taoist experience,
is only half our YangLeft with YinRight hemispheric history
of self and other full-governing
Our Warrior for ReAttachment
right-hemisphere half slow-grown differently interdependent,

A polyphonic harmonic web
for mutual attraction
of ego/eco-therapeutic re-attraction
to compassion’s historic
muticultural
deep-learning Ways
and Means, universal-Left balancing unitarian-Right harmonic,

Yang remembering to respect WiseElder
bilateral
feeling/memory revolutionary reversions
past intuitions through nurturing interdependent future thoughts
imaged wombs for webs of bicameral balancing
hollow messianic dipolar co-arising choice

To remain fully resilient,
vulnerably listening teachers,
win/win climate committed
conflict inversion resolution resolvers,
therapeutic polycultural mediators,
not so much monocultural molestors
indifferently tolerant of aggressive
degenerative
left-hemisphere dominant wide, but not deep-learning climates
for differentially fragmenting environments
as if intended for nihilistic lose/lose,
by learning to indifferently tolerate
universal silo subclimates of growing despair,
Fiddling while our only and last Bow burns.

To redefine wealth as health
and not indifferently tolerate fake small ego-centrism
as if our larger Earth-centric healthy inviting sanctuary space
were not also our first and last hollow bowing place,
yet uniting and passionately sacred
in this our Great UnRaveling/CoGravitating Time
of climaxing Yang-health
as Yin-wealth opportunity
for polyculturally optimizing systemic
resiliently co-passionate Nature,
Time’s Sage Bilateral Way.

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Einstein Speaks

Old Albert was frustrated.

He knew his famous ego-identity came from this solar eco-system
with four interdependent dimensional voices.

He felt his own original moment began with ZeroSum nutritional balance
between eco-centered womb
and emerging ego-centered identity,

And, he felt he would soon return
to some mysterious Zero DeadZone identity
as an interdependent eco-relative inter/outer-relationship
formerly languaged
and autonomously identified organic system,

But, Albert couldn’t quite articulate
his lifetime longed for universal theory
of early interdependent metric
geometric
ecometric ego/eco-bilateral co-relativity function.

Old Albert knew he was losing his cherished mind
to dementia,
and he knew from a lifetime of deep meditation,
if he thought out loud in words
he might better remember
what he called “Thought Experiment” medications
for his universally commodified cognitive LeftBrain
and his affective effluent unitarian-flowing RightBrain

Imaging 3D spatial revolving change
in 4D temporal-fractal whole-system revolutions
of wave-linear eco-systemic childhood memories,
like co-relational DNA
bilateral internal strings
of historic trans-regenerative images
in 4D interweaving undulations of nurturing rhythm.

So, Albert mumbled to himself
in universal-stage whispers
others might hear
but not comprehend,

Not because Albert hoped to obfuscate communication just yet,
but to help his ego LeftBrain language
develop and retain what he still felt could be new re-memories
as his burning metric vocation
to resolve Earth’s interdependently fertile history
at least within his own RightBrain’s feeling
of synergetic accomplishment,

Old Albert still looked for bicameral resolution
of troubling absent complete integrity
of math and science
symmetric arts of interdependent theory
through healthy WinWin
and not pathological LoseLose language

Ancient voices of metric natured ecosystems
and isometric spiritual ego-meditations
inspired by infant memories
of some distantly not-not polynomial 4D Paradise,

Some warm wet womb
composed of dual dark fecundity
from which he had ego/eco
patriarchal/matriarchal robustly emerged

Until now
in Albert’s last organically autonomous days,
reduced to speaking his internal meditations
out loud
on his smaller ego-centered fragmentary stage voice
hoping to remember
what both his Left and Right communicating networks
used to universally and interdependently hope to become
togethering

ZeroZone potential integrity
paid forward cooperatively EarthCentric,
nutritional ego-economic synergy
and eco-empowering meditating/medicating
not ZeroSum universally interdependent
WinWin ego/eco-consciousness.

Go ahead,
Albert mumbled,
Left to silent Right dominantly-prominently interdependent,
start with classic discernment,
“If I were to die tomorrow,
what would I hope to have universally accomplished
during my unitarian ego/eco-relational life?
Whether as a professional Integral Universal 4D Designer,
or a more Regenerative EarthJustice Green Advocate,
or more of an everyday avocation,
a DiPolar CoArising Multicultural Landscaper.”

Later,
we actively hope,
after he had entirely run through his LeftBrain languaged punch list
of imaged RightBrain eco-relational ideas,
Albert may have moved on to,
“If I were to die tomorrow,
if everyone I know and love were to die with me,
voiceless tomorrow,
what would we mumbling hope to have accomplished
more articulately together
during our ego/eco-cooperatively compassionate 4D lives?”

Whether as resilient WinWin integral health-passioned landscapes,
biotic natural/spiritual ego/ecosystems,
or mere ego-fragmented
LoseLose nihilistic
economically disempowered disease disasters
having finally arrived at our LeftBrain deductively logical
tragically autonomous
self-unfulfilling ZeroSum prophecy.

Standard
Uncategorized

Truth Isn’t Truth

Attorney Giuliani,
concerned about perjury charges,
declares sometimes Truth is not Truth

So I suppose
Fake is not necessarily False
and it’s OK for us to believe
whatever feels most convenient,
given our orthodox requirements
to get through each WinTruth/LoseFalse day.

He might mean partial truth is not full transparent disclosure,
But, then, partial fake is not full false disinformation,
But, in either case,
and both together,
These do not sound like moral True is legal False
nor moral False is Legal True,
which would be a logical
and analogical
and ecological
and biological
and theological
and ethological
and eisegetical
and metaphysical
problem of cognitive legal
and affective moral disconnect issues,
disassociating concern,
anti-contextual chaos,
anti-historical nihilism

Growing cultural vulnerability
to propaganda,
in which partial truth propositions
propose entirely false dispositions,

And partial false dispositions
try to dispose of entirely transparent oppositional truths.

A second amendment case in point.
I saw a picture of a sign defining Infringement
Then confronting matriarchal cooperative witnesses
favoring automated ballistic free zones
for our children’s schools
and for our community centers
and local bars,
post offices,
etc.

The sign fully disclosed the last half
of the second amendment,
…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

However, this is the “what”
without disclosing the historically explicit “why”
encoded in the first half of the amendment:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,

This was most articulately
and definitively written
as a State v Federal Rights issue
to avoid bullying behaviors
of plutocratic power-hungry supremacists,
potential federal CEO demi-gods

Who might overcome democracy’s co-empathic trusting potential
by creating climates
in which the wisdom of The People
is clouded by advocates of partial truths
masked as transparent cooperative Trust Truth
and partial fakes
hiding vulnerable false dispositions
to not inquire too deeply
about original historical intent
for full healthy-wealth disclosures
of happy democratic wellbeing.

False propagated dispositions
trying to dispose of infrangible
not infringe-able
contextual historical truths
of original public health-intentional record.

 

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Einstein and Bucky’s Fifth Quarter

Bucky:
Why didn’t you remind people
that relativity of spacetime relationship
is double-bound and fractally rhythmed
under he Commons Metric Assumption
of 3 spatial and 1 bilateral progenitive time dimension
equals a Zero-Moment spacetime-centric
balancing thermodynamic theory?

Einstein:
Why didn’t you choose my word “relativity”
rather than your more positive-slanted “synergy”
in your geometrics of universal consciousness?

Bucky:
Eulerian prime relationality is midway positive
but also double-knotted and fractal negative,
as convex-within.
If Synergetics has a positive stance,
it may also be true
that “relativity” has a negatively-reductive slant.
Zero-Core Concave/Convex Universe
as Prime Relationship
feels more nondually transparent
than a Universal Theory of Relativity…
but, oh yes, by the way,
this Relativity of space and time story
takes place
within our shared assumption
of 4 equidimensional dynamics
as Prime Fractal SpaceTime Relationship.

Einstein:
I don’t recall saying anything about fractals,
although I did stipulate a 3-Space and 1-Time
Universe
as we know it in human-consciousness.

Bucky:
But c-squared begins with a fractal.
Square roots
regenerate metric-logical fractals.
To commodify the speed of light’s 0-Core Time
as “c-squared”
is to point directly at Bohm’s Implicate Order
of fractal form and functional dynamic syntax
st-ringing theory.

Einstein:
You think too much in ecologic.
Math and physics
boil and toil and trouble
more inclusively as Group Theory.

Bucky:
Well,
have you been following what Thurston
and Perelman
and those folks
have been saying
about the double-elliptical binding 0-soul core
of any integrative,
confluent,
and logically possible,
rational system?

Einstein: No, zero is much too small
to timelessly hold
my eternally universal interest.

Bucky:
Not that I always need the last word
but zero is also much too timeless
to share your expansive consciousness.

Einstein:
Hah!
That was a good one.

Standard
Uncategorized

Polynomial v. Not Polynomial Time and Space

We can approach this issue about how to optimize the syntax of digital information trends, and the timely analysis of these trends, with a dual hypothesis, to see which is more productive of a healthy and wealthy past, present, and future.

P is not equivalent to NP:

The proposition “Polynomial information is non-equivalent to Not-Polynomial information” has been our scientific, deductive, and metric-analytical encultured assumption, our “Binary Business As Usual”. Doing so, however, fails to explain why digital information is reliably binary-syntaxed information. There is an implied assumption of electromagnetic balance within binary equivalent structure of informing trend analysis. We have not rationally explained why some issues, problems, algorithms, variables, nomials, memes, paradigms, facts have resonantly resolvable solutions, while others calculate their way into infinity. Which issue and algorithm will produce which outcome, rational v. irrationally indefinite, is rather like trying to predict and ¬†segregate revolutions from evolution.

P is reverse-equivalent (nondual dipolar co-arising) to NP:

If, however, we start with the heuristic assumption that P=NP, where might this take us toward explaining outstanding teleological, economic, ecological, sustainable health as wealth, and perhaps even cosmological issues?

Game Theory: +Win (P) = {-/-}equi-valent Not-Lose Draw (NP)

Group Theory: Explicate [D. Bohm] Convex Boundary +0 = {-,-} Implied Co-Gravitational Concave Prime Relationship (Perelman, Thurston-on 4-Prime elliptical binomial dimensionality)

Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetics: +0 Core Vertex = (-)0 Core Vortex “black hole”

Dual-Transparent Cosmology Origination Story: +0 Dark Matter =  {-,-}0 Dark Energy [Zero-Dimensional Binomial Gravitational co-arising relationship]

Taoism: +0Yang Form-Power = {-,-}Yin-Yin Midway optimal-flow function, reverse 1- temporal/3=spatial, 4 dimensional equi-valent Commons.

Information Theory: +1 Octave QByte = {-,-}0 = 4(+)/4(-) QBit Electromagnetic 4-dimensional Fractal Balance

Permacultural Systems Theory: Regenerative Energy = “Square” rooted 4-dimensional Decomposing Gravity, “reverse-hierarchical cognitive/neural tree-structure”;

yielding: Thermodynamic Primal Balance Principle of embryonic DNA/RNA regeneratively encrypted function.

These diverse paradigms each appear premised on the more primal assumption that life and thought and language, the universe co-arising within and without us, folds and unfolds bi-nomially, in a cosmological embryonic soup with metric ecologic that +space = double-binding (-,-) time,

as +Mass [physical-photon universe] = double-transparent (-,-) ergodically balancing (0)-Core binomially co-arising Gravity as Reverse-Time Ex-Formating Commons = (+)/(-)c-square rooting, precessive, implicate disorder with binomial/binary nondual co-arising syntax.

Permaculturally speaking, the metric observation that P=NP can be equivalently translated as Yang=YinYin (win-win cooperative economics and ecological prime relationship) within 4-equi-dimensionally co-evolving interdependent systems.

 

 

 

Standard