The problem of PolyNomials,

equivalent or not?

with NotPolyNomials

hides a geometric assumption

that was profoundly challenged by Bucky Fuller.

Polynomial v NotPolynomial

assumes if we could distinguish NP from P sets of information

in advance of processing trials,

then we would know two sets of bipolar information.

Yet this is no more, or less, the case

than to say that something is not

is to contain and delineate more valued information

than to say it is

at least notnot right now.

This equivalence or not

between not polynomial information

and notnot polynomial information

may be better redeveloped,

more cooperatively regenerate,

to see PolyNomials as binary informating bits,

where two notnot negative exformating ambivalents

equal one positive PolyNomial equivalent

dipolar co-arising positive convex

as also dualdark co-gravitating concave bipolar.

For example,

YangLight c-squared

equivalent with YinYin e-squared

primal convex/concave

outside/inside

temporal double-binding relationship,

0-sum fractal prime function,

like DNA and RNA string theorems

of regeneratively double-bound in/ex-formation.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*