Summer ReForesting School

what did you most appreciate
learning at school this summer?

Probably in Community ReForesting.
You know, the EcoTherapy Class
I took
instead of eating lunch,
using “lunch” loosely
as synonymous with edible,
or at least tangentially related to edibility.

Oh yes, that one.
What stands out for you most
in your Community ReForesting Cooperative Administration Class?
I’m about ready to fall off the edge of my ecopolitical seat
with hypnotically trusting wonder and awe.

So, yeah,
since you’re so fascinated and all,
it was studying the therapeutic ecological meaning
of the regenerative root systemic word for EduCation
as, basically, (0)Sum WinWin EcoPolitically refined Cation,
a revolutionary reweaving
of Lovelock’s Gaian Hypothesis
plus Taoist as Zeroist
Yang+Yin = WinWin
equals notnot PolyNomial YinSquared
equals 0-Core PrimeRelational Fuller-Eulerian Fractal-Squared=Octave
Spiral 4-dynamic season
Revolutionary Sacred RightBrain Inductive
Yin is (-,- double-bind, geo-eco-binary) Zero
dipolar loves (+)1 UniVersal Interdependent Yang Thesis,

BiLateral Dynamics
(0)-Prime ReLationship-ReLigionship
c-squared is dipolar appositional
more than bipolar oppositional
(0)Sum PrimeRelational-Fractal InFormation
is also ExFormation dualdark-squared co-gravitation,
or chopped up any non-equivalent cognitive-affectively dissonant
algebraic and non-geometric fraction of a function
or thermodynamic ratio or ration
or formational spacetime function as ecofunction
or reforesting synchronization
we might EcoCationally prefer.

you started with Cation trends of soil,
strength and nurturing flow optimization indicators,
and ended up back
at our (0)Sum
deep dualdark Black Hole
double-bound Zero
equals YinYin quantity/quality,
and hence your name,
another name for (0)Sum Cation HealthTrends?

thanks a lot for naming me after dirt Mom,
that helps a lot with the social life,
know what I mean?
Loved sharing summer memories,
getting back to Cation
to EcoCation
as Education
seems clearer to me
if you follow the historical-enculturing outline:

is a way of measuring,
contrasting WinWin to LoseLose dynamic production
and absorbing co-mentoring nutrient consumption,
bilateral exchange capacities
within soil.

is our way of RightBrain inducting,
while LeftBrain languaging,
contrasting WinHealthy with LosePathology
ecopolitically cooperative
collateral production and consumption nutrition-absorption trends,
bilateral hemispheric cooperative exchange capacity development/devolution
within 0-Core Gaian EarthTribe CoMessianic-Bodhisattva Souls.

is best CoMentoring
secularLeft and SacredRight
WinWin optimizing
EgoLeft with EcoRight root-systemic
reforesting Paradise Beloved Communities
enculturing Minds with healthy growing bodies,
one of which is named YinYin
for revolutionary dirt,
or some such oxymoron.

is how we define
and deductively delineate
WinLeftEgo (personal and/or national-cultural) exegetical
and LoseRight NonElite, Yin-repressed through Yang-dominant eisegetical,
from LoseLeft short-term exegetical deductive
AND LoseRight long-degenerative future through past inductive.

While EcoCation
added to the above,
reductive, non-bilateral balanced, EduCation
yields the full spectral balance of WinWin through LoseLose:

WinLeftYang–0Sum–WinRight YinSquared (me, holonic-fractaled)
like DNA regenerative function with phylogenic fractal form,
interdependently holonic,
perpetuating bilateral
Four-Dimensional ergodic-spiraling
Spirit/Nature NonDual SpaceTime.

could bilaterally optimize Deep Sacred Ecology Learning
through enculturation of Left and Right balance,
polyphonic octaved
polypathic fractaled
creolizing polycultural health outcomes
Secular EcoCation AND Sacred EduCation Inductive Wisdom-Personal Eisegetical Felt Trust v Mistrust v Active Distrust
as re-mapped
by Elder RightBrain RNA
ergodic thermodynamic balancing
Eulerian Prime Function ReMemory
of Commons polyphonic multi-sensory octaves.

is our shared co-mentoring vocation,
bodhisattva everyday preoccupations,
currently embraced,
more or less Yang/Yin
WinWin harmonic balanced by
cooperatively self-organizing PermaCultural Designers
of interior landscapes and exterior climates of and for health,
delineated with production and consumption seasonally adjusted
systemic ego/eco-systems
as cooperativized by a few revolutionary feminist ecotherapists,
transgendering great transitional poets
transitioning great transgenderal lyricists,
cooperative ecopolitical evolutionary Gaian Theorists called EcoLogists
of original hypostatic zero-fractal unions,
Taoist Wu-Wei Tipping Points
dipolar co-arising
Yang + Yin
does not equal
Yang V. Yin (Win/Lose, Either-Or Deductive Dominant)
just as Both-And not(+)not(+)
does not normatively,
rationally equal
Either Win deductively (+) Or Lose inductively (-)
because WinWin is a healthier slow-growth change choice,
more naturally-spiritually nondual co-arising harmonic,
most physically and metaphysically regenerative,
like 0-sum fractal structure
of thermodynamically balanced
4D RealTime

Thank you,
I’m sure that was clear to somebody,
although that person would not be me.

Now, Yang,
what did you learn at school today?
And remember,
this is not a competition about whose day was best
and most loving
and healthy
and cooperative,
much less a competition
to see who can go on and on the longest,
and fattest,
and most plutocratically fascist,
which is no way to run a reforesting summer school,
rather much monoculturally lessening
competitively learning
more Win to Lose
Business As Usual
in a Yang-supremacist culture.




Global HealthCare Standards

Health care standards
are climate care constants
and resilient variables.

Health care and receiving constants
across cultures and diverse species
of plant and animal,
and perhaps even mineral, lifespans,
each and all declare
mentoring mutual health is positive,
between ego-center
and eco-exterior,
Yang and bilateral, or even multilateral, Yin,
squared and cubed
and fractal and octaves
of resilient variable sounds
and light,
space and changing interdependent times.

And absence of Golden Rule
mutual health wealth resilience,
is both climate eco-exterior
and landscape ego-uncentering

if health care and receiving
is ecopolitically good for One,
it is therefore resiliently good for All,
regardless of age,
animal or plant lifespans
of ecopolitical
and psychological
health care constant development
across resilient multigenerations.

health care systems,
like climate care systems
and cooperative networks,
from and form single nondual co-arising payer systems
of regenerative cooperation,
interdependently resilient
EarthTribe Elder co-investors
in pay-wealth-forward priorities
of WinWin 0-sum principles
like Gaia Hypotheses
and WinWin Game Theories
cooperating in bilateral BiCameral Minds
with HealthCare and Receiving
mutually loving interdependent Bodies.


Universal Trusts

As winter seasons dark humor,
so summer reasons hate.

Lovelock and Margolis’ Gaia Hypothesis
is Bateson’s Sacred Ecology
deep double-bound Co-Learning Thesis,
is Bucky Fuller’s fractal-rooted Holonic CoOperative Synergy
is Messiah-Bodhisattva Syncretism
is Game Theory’s WinWin EcoLogic
for both short and long-term positive ecotherapeutic hypotheses
predicting universal democratization
with EarthJustice and Humane Peace
regenerative Health-Wealth Outcomes

Also expected from bilaterally self-perpetuating Group Theories
of Perelman Polynomial Out deductive
equals polypathic inductive not-not ambivalence,
YangFather SunSpeed of Light
progenitor of YinRevolving SeasonalMother Earth
4D RealTime bilateral
ReGenerativity Theory

Like Love’sLocked Gaia Original First Principle
nondual zero = tao dipolarity
PostMillennial ZeroSum In/ExFormation Revolution.

Geometrics of science
as ecology of notnot logic
equals Yang-Yes!,
Yang of yin-squared RNA/DNA fractal redevelopment stories.

as double-binding,
0-sum octaves

Of natural-spiritual
nondual co-arising
Left with RightBrain balancing his/herstory,
self-perpetuating education
in- and ex-formation.
Special Case and NotNotYet-Begun,
past thru future EcoGaian
BiLateral SpaceTime
Hypostatic 0 Union.

As winter seasons dark humor,
so summer reasons hate.
As winter seasons hated longing,
so summer reasons ecologic’s humor.


I’m Not Sure

I’m not sure
if nature’s spiritual voices,
if Earth’s cultural songs and dances,
are merely subjectively interesting
nutritional creolizing metaphors,
or if all ecological analogies
are necessarily and objectively interesting,
or perhaps even both,
sacred-secular co-arising.


Math Problems

The problem of PolyNomials,
equivalent or not?
with NotPolyNomials
hides a geometric assumption
that was profoundly challenged by Bucky Fuller.

Polynomial v NotPolynomial
assumes if we could distinguish NP from P sets of information
in advance of processing trials,
then we would know two sets of bipolar information.
Yet this is no more, or less, the case
than to say that something is not
is to contain and delineate more valued information
than to say it is
at least notnot right now.

This equivalence or not
between not polynomial information
and notnot polynomial information
may be better redeveloped,
more cooperatively regenerate,
to see PolyNomials as binary informating bits,
where two notnot negative exformating ambivalents
equal one positive PolyNomial equivalent
dipolar co-arising positive convex
as also dualdark co-gravitating concave bipolar.

For example,
YangLight c-squared
equivalent with YinYin e-squared
primal convex/concave
temporal double-binding relationship,
0-sum fractal prime function,
like DNA and RNA string theorems
of regeneratively double-bound in/ex-formation.


Energy’s Dying Wish

So, if I understand correctly,
you want to respond to inevitable energy descent
by upgrading incentives for cooperative communication,
positive information expansion,
research and regenerative design,
and ecopolitical evaluation strategies?

because we achieved current WinWin cooperative communication
and organic networking capacities
by virtue of investment advances
through recent past patriarchal dominant cultures
drawing down slow-grown renewable sources of energy,
especially oil and gas
coal and trees,
these having emerged over multiple millennial investments
of time,
stories told in ergodic rhythm languages
of Earth,
and yang-climate atmospheres
creating lungs for co-respiring systems
and bicameral hearts
for communicating nutritional feedback systems,
and stomachs for competitive and cooperative digestive exchange systems,
and capital-investing minds
for creating cooperative political empowering tools
and languages
and ecosystems.

Wow, that covered a lot of polyculturing outcomes!
Now, if we could come back down to Mother Earth,
and not quite so deeply lost within your nutritional ecology,
for our conversation today.
Could you say more about what you mean by cooperative v competitive invested communication,
are regenerative research design strategies
your suggested ecopolitical application
for more positive communication?

We have developed diverse frames for dipolar cooperative outcome farming
among more competitively complex survival relationships.

Systems theory speaks of whole interdependent co-arising networks
(and thereby also dualdark co-gravitating)
of mutual subsidiary alliance,
within a concave matriarchal,
lattice network architecture
co-empowering networks of cooperative communication.

Then, too,
we have Closed System patriarchal Business As Capitalism Usual.

We also see these dipolar contrasts across a co-arising spectrum
in Process Theology
and Game Theory,
where WinWin continues regenerative play
across relational transactions,
while WinLose competitions
of self more and others less
are rooted more in patriarchal capitalism’s
misunderstandings of Earth’s most regenerate revolutions
rooted in Mother Earth’s nutritionally nurtured
Golden Rule.

I’m not sure that responded to my question
about cooperative v competitive communication,
especially in this context of self-perpetuating research design.

Well then,
I’m not cooperating very well
am I?
Let’s see,
maybe an example.

Let’s imagine
you are the original creator of language.
Your job
is to research the function of things,
and the energy flow of relationships,
to invent, as inclusively as possible,
some sounds and actions
that become nouns and verbs
and prepositions
and then, too, some adjectives and nuancing adverbs,
and especially some exclamations
to communicate cooperatively
about when shit happens,
as it will,
but also when grace happens,
as Earth unfolds spacetime
in four equivalent dimensions,
an thereby must enfold concave
dualdark (0)-sum ergodic patterns
of co-intelligent balance.

So, my vocation
is not just to unilaterally invent polynomial labels
but also to find out what my family and friends
could effectively reiterate
as mutually nutritional information?

verbal sounds and nonverbal actions
for equivalent health v pathology meanings
between extended families of multiculturing species,
thereby growing positive exegetical communication,
and not just adding further eisegetical Towers of Babel
multicultural communication and concomitant economic
and political empowerment/disempowerment problems,
more than polypathically regenerative co-empowerment.

So we look and listen together
for cooperative resolutions
already in use,
and we notice historical relationships
between siblings first,
then between generations of siblings next,
on out to include all animated objects,
in process of becoming history’s polynomial network
of subjects.

Time unfolds bilaterally
and binomially
and multi-generationally,
where new-yin grows old-yang grows new-yin.
Every polynomial generation
seems to have not just our spoken nomial deductive label,
but also a setting apart from it’s organic hypostatic understory.
Every polynomial
includes an implied binomially interdependent cognitive relationship
with Earth’s other causes
and Earth’s oncoming multiculturing
nutritionally cooperative
and toxically competing effects.

Am I cooperatively communicating
this regeneratively co-designing
WinWin cooperative ecopolitical game yet?

I’m not sure your example helped your cooperative intent.
But, we are nearly out of time…

No, that can’t be.
Perhaps we’re merely running out of mutual highest priority time
for co-investment in this particular direction,
for now.

I stand corrected.

No need to stand.
Keep spiraling around our subject
in your reiterative
back to (0)-sum zoning in way,
helping us stay on our cooperative target.

perhaps you could give an example
of how we might upgrade incentives
for cooperative communication,
both verbal and nonverbal.

You’re asking about Golden Rule applications,
cooperating mythos with LeftBrain dominant logos.
To incentivize YinRight matriarchal equivalence,
give prejudicial weight to WinWin
as our default cooperative strategy
for research and policy development
and framing ancient WinLose polarized issues
between yang secular deductivity
and yin sacred inductivity,
because regenerative is to degenerative
as animating dipolar co-arisings
are to static polarizing competing extremities
not at all polynomial,
remaining dissonantly adrift
as notnot polynomial variations
for I Am
without yet echoing
Therefore We Are.

We are…

Cooperatively regenerate communicators
more than competitively WinLose degenerators.

That was an example,
or a principle?

An example
could be cash
for actively participating in cooperatively owned
and self-governed regenerative communication,
for WinWin choice-making valued higher than
WinLose overpowering,
for deep ecological economic education,
for democratic bicameral implementation
and whole Earth ecosystemic co-evaluation processes,
in which coal and oil and gas fields
are becoming increasingly disinvested,
while trees building Earth’s climates
and fire and water decomposing landscapes
each cast their Golden Rule.

Pay more for cooperative investment,
and charge less interest for co-investment.

Charge higher interest
and autonomous user fees for persons,
including corporations
who would continue competitively disinvesting
away from climate and landscape ecotherapies.

it feels to me like we have communicated
for future positive relationships
for us.
How about you?
Where would you place this interview
on your energy-giving v energy-receiving scale?
Where WinWin is (0)-sum balanced,
giving at least as good as Golden Rule receiving.