Richard Dawkins’ Dilemma

Excuse me, Mr. Dawkins,
or maybe two,
if you please:

You say “we are survival mechanisms.”
which of course who could live to dispute?
from looks of me and you
and human natures more generally,
and bicamerally,
we are also health-thrival-relational
cooperative organisms
before we could ever get to all that
struggling with survivolution.

You call us, “Robot machines,
blindly programmed to preserve
the selfish molecules known as genes.”
To which I heartily add my

Amen, we are bionic bio-eco-systems,
bicamerally DNA/RNA programmed
to regenerate SelfAsOther
Folding and Unfolding temporal messages
through Time’s enculturing memory:
light’s 3D spatial structure
reverses dualdark co-gravitation
equivalently iconic and regenerative ionic
throughout bionic ecological
and binomial analogical/geological
(0)-soul temporal-neural bilateral dimension.

Photosynthetic incarnation
like polymorphic symbiotic transfiguration,
sacred self as othering,
while swimming in co-relational emergent health through loving synergy.

Not so blindly programmed
when bicamerally ecoconscious
of self-as-other health regenesis,
Permacultural Design for Interior as Exterior,
v. pathologically chaotic dissonance;
absence of cooperative co-arising relationship
with Earth’s EcoSyntaxed Universe.