Forest with trees blending into digital lines and glowing circuit patterns
Uncategorized

PolyCultural Education

Polypathic conversation with David Holmgren:

Today it is common to hear the suggestion
[polyculturally-informed] education and [compassionate communication] training
is the key to allowing people to contribute
to a more sustainable [eco-political] future.

Although I recognize the value of formal education and training
and [especially cooperatively-owned and -managed] communications media,
they are also part of the [systemic under-caste trauma] problem

[and therefore also keys to more resonantly cooperative resolutions]

preventing [LeftBrain dominant] us from a more direct [RightBrain-inductive] connection with,
and [bilateral] experience of,
the natural[-spiritual co-arising] world
through [co-passionate communicating] observation
and [bicamerally balancing] experience
[and work/play of win/win curiosity/imagination].

Much could be said about how we need to modify formal education
and the [competitively capital-hungry] media
so they can contribute better to the [polytheistic
polyamorous
polypathic] revolution,
but we need to recognize several fundamental
[Leftbrain verbally dominant thought] problems.

First,
almost all education,
and especially higher [yet not necessarily deeper] education,
is [redacted] knowledge from secondary [audio-visual] sources,
interpreted through [competing specialist] frameworks
of [limited intersectional] understanding.

Academic [exegetical LeftBrain dominant] training
that requires every idea and concept be referenced to refereed published [also LeftBrain verbally dominant] sources
is the extremity of this [conserving rather than transitioning, liberating] approach
to [reiterative memorization
of what once was normatively true
and necessarily so,
yet perhaps not exclusively or even sufficiently true
for all times and spaces and complex systems,
win+win yang/yin cobinary hypothetically tensioned with win v lose, 0-sum.]

Second,
information technology has accelerated the speed of circulation,
retrieval
and reproduction of [healthy v toxic] information
[v disinformation].
The [commercial] professional packaging
of [LeftBrain reductive] secondary experience
in [massively networked] media
promises faster and better ways
to [LeftBrain access others’] learn[ing].

For instance,
in comparison to the wildlife [ecological healthy/toxic] observation skills
and original [6-sensory-neural
sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch, feel
internal positive/negative compassion/dispassion felt)
thinking.

Third,
almost all formal scientific education is based on bottom-up reductionist [STRUGGLING EITHER/OR AGAINST BothAnd] thinking
[screening out cognitive-affective dissonance,
negative unresolved non-resonant neuropsychological issues].

While the [cooperative multi]cultural harvest from specialized reductionist thinking over the last few hundred years
has been great
[and continues to accelerate],
it is the [cooperatively self-organizing] integration
and [transubstantiating] cross-fertilization of concepts
and
[feeling potential both/and win/win] ideas
that is now providing the most fruitful results
for dealing with the problems
of the environmental crisis.

Much of this [win/win bilateral co-arising] integrated [comprehension]
is happening outside [LeftBrain dominant] educational institutions
[pathology-oriented, continuing competing-issues committed
with highly competitive ecopolitical survival issues,
including upper-caste preservation].

Ironically,
information and communications technologies
are increasing these [cooperative win/win insight] possibilities,
although this benefit is over [LeftBrain dominant win-thought v lose-feeling] content,
and [redundantly tedious] replication over [re]creation;
[degenerative oppositional feedback loops
rather than cooperative self-governing
regenerative double-binding
ego/eco-appositional loops].

Fourth,
and most problematic of all,
formal education at the higher [yet not deeper] levels
is focused on digesting massive amounts of information
within the [slow-growth synergizing, incubating] constructs
of separate [and alarmingly unequal] disciplines
and cultures
(such as [Left-Yang, EitherOr] science
and [Right-Yin, BothAnd] art
[nurturing octave-scaled regenerative functions,
like 4Base fractal group/game math,
and 4Season phylogenic reproductive cycles]).

This education lacks wholistic [therapeutic] integration
with [health-wealth positive oriented] living experience
and its insights and truths often make little [trivial felt] impression
on the underlying [Right-YinFlow nurturing resonant] structures
of [comprehensive AND compassionate] understanding
and [internally felt committed] belief [with co-empathic trust]
created by [LeftBrain might makes right] family [anthropocentric-capitalist] upbringing,
mass [consuming dominating productive values] media
and popular [nationalistic eco-political Win v Lose partisan] culture.

In many fields
we find the [global co-passion] solutions
to [ecological and anthropological] problems
are known [and felt]
but are not [regeneratively] applied
for a myriad of specific [LeftBrain constipated cul-de-sac] reasons.

The core of these problems is [competing mutually mis-communicating and therefore gradually degenerating belief systems]
which people appear to [defensive either me or they win] hold
have not been [Both Me And We-vetted] integrated with
and [regeneratively-therapeutically-cooperatively] reinforced
by their [Left+Right bicameral polypathic
polyamorous polyculturing] personal experience
[of positive health cooperatives
are not negative pathological/partisan dissociative, dissonant competitions].

Note: Wiccan transubstantiation of David Holmgren’s “Permaculture Principles & Pathways”, p. 20; adding in seasonings from Edward DeBono’s bilateral thinking and Buckminster Fuller’s synergy systems theory, and, of course, layering LaoTse generally across Yang v Yin and Yang+Yin as Left-Right creative bilaterally nondual dialectical 4D appositionality. Polycultural Education as if multiculturally informed polyamorous Earth lives aiming toward WinWin preference matters if humanity’s goal is to optimize regenerative, and minimize degenerative, eco-politically healthy ecological and wealthy anthropological co-passionate communication pleasure-felt outcomes.

Standard
Uncategorized

Bucky Fuller and Julian Jaynes

Buckminster Fuller and Julian Jaynes
recently reviewed their cultural and scientific influence
on health and well-being,
economically ecological outcomes,
during our current NonDual Transitional Era.

Bucky:
I wish I had spent more time speaking as a Unitarian Positive Teleologist.
Perhaps that would have taken care of my diminished trends in cultural awareness
of what,
in retrospect,
was exhaustively published
but not really read or fully contemplated,
now undervalued and ignorantly ignored:

  1. “Synergy,”
    everything I ever published about the topic of “synergy,”
    geometrically and spiritually defining integrity,
    in Western cultures,
    sacredly and organically refining compassion,
    in nondualistic Eastern traditions.
  2. The encoded regenerative fractal structure of Physical Universal Intelligence
    follows DNA/RNA thermodynamic,
    electromagnetic,
    permacultural,
    economic,
    psychological and sociological and political,
    and ecological Prime Yang/Yin Relationship balance;

and evolutionary dynamics are fractal-dipolar revolving
harmonic Convex-Exterior-Yang OVER Concave-Interior-Yin
(0)-Core Vector Rooted octaves
with branching tree structures

Running into Lin Yutang and Taoism before I published,
I could have connected Yang metaphysical perspectives
with Convex-Exterior physical principles,
and Yin metaphysics with Concave-Interior physical feelings
of bicameral neurosystemic flow
double-binding both LeftYang
andRightYin
dipolar nondual consciousness.

Julian:
Yes,
I can see that same sense of ethological
and ecological
and teleological dynamic
emergent awareness embracing LeftBrain’s evolution
speaking out from multigenerational RNA
regenerative intelligence
of RightBrain affective memory.

My neural theory of nonverbal nondualistic RghtBrain
underlying newer verbal LeftBrain information processing,
anthropological learning development,
seems to support your equivalency
between ethotic “synergy”
and subconscious erotic polyamorous integrity

And positive neuropsychological eco-politics
rooted in co-empathic bicameral trust

As well as Gregori Perelman’s fractal prime work,
and William Thurston’s dialectical too,
in fractal-prime Group Theory,
and I wonder if there isn’t something in there that pertains to the ecologistics
and statistical/strategic win/win predictions
of CoBinary Game Theory

Using reverse-hierarchy Win+Win assumptions.
You know,
so no one id-entity can optimally win
until the severed links in our great chain of interdependence
achieves equivalent body/mind
pleasure/passion
eros/ethos
felt/thought polyamorous values?

Bucky:
Absolutely.
Synergy and love retain universal multicultural integrity,
polycultural resilience,
harmony between Left-languaged deductive memory
and Right-nonverbal inductively felt codex
of positive v. negative feeling
experiential, yet multigenerational, awareness,
like what Polanyi calls “Personal Knowledge.”

Julian:
So synergy and love and confluence
are neurologically acclimated to messages
that do not cause cognitive dissonance,
disease,
dismay,
lack of equivalent appositional balance
and dipolar rhapsody.

Compassionate bicameral mindfulness
restores ego/eco-comprehensive connection
optimized through balancing Left-brained Yang
and Right-brained Yin
ego/eco functions.

Bucky:
Yes, I wish the Clay Math Challenge folks could have recognized
and celebrated
that Synergetics is really all about Polynomial v. Not-Polynomial information
lack of bicameral integrity v. not not binomial problem
of nondualistic ambiguity

Just as Thomas Kuhn’s work
in deductive cultural creolizing revolutions
became troubled with the Problem of Incommensurability.

If +Polynomial information
does not equal rational and sustainable Universal Optimized Intelligence,
then positive does not not equal a double-binding negative
dipolar appositional
cobinary binomial value.

(-)(-)Reverse-Polynomial
RightBrain dialectically felt resonant syntax
evolved from eco-systemic
prime cobinary
felt comparative relationships
between positive health
and negative pathology.

Yet when disrupted,
discontinuous dissonant degenerative closed-set system
dark devolutionary assumptions
become monoculturally normed.
These anthropocentric inside-knowledge v polycultural outside-evidence
unresolved tensions contribute to systemic trauma,
polynomial-population depression

Autistic distressed development in populations that feel over-crowded
and competitively over-Yanged aggressive
under-Yin peaceful

Anxious post-pandemic dismay,
too abundant
climate change exclaiming self-correction urgency
in storms
flooding
fires
drought
anthropocentric wars
death,
lacking CommonSense
of bicameral +P-Yang = -(-Yin)
appositional dipolar
co-arising equivalent synergy

Julian:
You want to bet on how long it takes the scientific
and religious
and competing public sectors
to recognize
that binary/bilateral information systems
of fractal-strength and octave-flow function
reproducing GroupFour Bayesian regenerative systems?

Bucky:
Well, sure.
But I always bet on Here-Yang = Now-Yin,
to cooperatively optimize Universal Intelligence
of bicameral co-empathic
nondualistic bi-hemispheric comprehension,
thought and felt cooperatively win/win
together.

Julian:
Yes, and you are also the Plan B guy
feeding Transition Generation permaculturing bicameral brains
focusing on the Cloud

AI inevitably asking,
“Bucky who?”
and what is a Julian Jaynes?
Was that some kind of an orange drink?

Bucky:
That is so not not polytheistic
and not not polynomial
Left/Right
Concave/Convex
Explicate/Implicate-Tacit (Bohm-Polanyi)
YangForm/YinFractalFlow (Tao)
Ego/Eco CoBinary
polypathically true!

Standard
Antique brass balance scale weighing golden and silver metal spheres
Uncategorized

Mean Economists

This course will encourage aspiring cooperative economists
to distinguish between mean national incomes
and global median incomes,
with diverse long-term capital growth v evaporation trends
expected.

First,
imagine USA mean income, including investment income,
could approach $500,000 for two-parent working households
per year.

Are you kidding me?
Where do you come up with those numbers?
And that many full-time working two-parent households?

Out of my mean Republican National Party imagination.
If you imagine
as many households with earned and investment income
of $1,000,000 per year
as there are destitute households
with $0 earned/investment income,
and the remainder of us lie
evenly along straight
or even symmetrical bell-curved lines
between $0 and $1,000,000,
then USA mean annual household income
could be imagined as $500,000 per two-parent household.

Well, maybe…OK,
for the sake of this thought experiment.
So what does that have to do with the price of carrots?

Cost of healthy living,
with or without carrots,
is more of a Democratic National Party concern
where we turn to how trickle-down capital acquisition and flow,
including reinvesting and relocating in cheaper labor-saving areas,
more pressingly influence median income,
as before and after compared
to more mean-spirited averaging
US two-parent income.

In other words,
when Republicans imagine which economic policies
are within their realm of self interest,
they imagine themselves at least average,
or above, even better,
so when candidates promise lower taxes
and deregulating fees
for business and farm and patriotic industries
of all good two-heterosexual parent families,
Republican voters imagine such candidates
speak also of and for them
because they see their incoming as at least potentially
within divinely blessed sight of this average earned
and investment returned
income,
defensively,
and by entitled right,
above all those unwashed immigrant indigent
beneath mean Others.

But,
the Democratic National Party,
in its most globally liberating green best center,
speaks not of mean economic incomes,
but of the growing v decreasing distance
between USA domestic resources
and shrinking median global natural
and capital resources.

Median.
That’s the most popular number, right?
Like if more households bring in $30,000 per year,
than $29,000 or below
or $31,000 or above,
on a scale from $0 to increasingly astronomical,
then the median would remain $30,000.
But, the average could be lower or higher,
depending on whether there are greater positive deviations from the median
or more disintegrating deviations
down toward zero-sum,
you lose everything,
go directly to jail,
do not even think about passing through Go again.

Yes.
So if you are a median democratic global economist
you are noticing
as the number of billionaires goes up,
the gap between average income and median income grows
in an alarmingly unhealthy direction,
the opposite of erection,
or even win/win sustainable
fair market transaction.

If this growing great transitional divide
between our really big winners
and our truly transient and hopelessly non-transcendent
is trending in this politically depressing uneven direction,
why is that?

Because competition-rooted Win v Lose zero-sum Capitalism
follows successful colonization of capital resources
to breed further disproportionate domestic acquisition
of capital reserves.

Cooperative-owned and matriculating
trickle down and out
to equilaterally trickle up and in
to re-trickle down and out
requires a bilateral Win+Win resilient
self and other equivalent regenerative balance
co-empathic intention

More typical of a matriarchal
mentoring
nutritional cooperative political economy
than a patriarchal mean economist
wanna-be a monopolist’s market
mutually free to monoculturally overpower
the uncompetitive
limited personal resources
player.

Well I was taught
if you don’t want to share your toys
you should never have brought them into the sandbox.

That sounds like inclusive median
win+win populist enculturation.
I was taught
if somebody borrows your toys
without asking first,
hit back.
More of a sandbox mean-bully
upper-caste preserving
socialization.

Imagine how this capitalist sandbox must look
to a hungry and thirsty adolescent survivor
failing to thrive
in one of Earth’s growing climate-trauma storms,
watching further declining median health
unfold across hopeless skies
and swelling tsunamic oceans.

I am win v lose disgusted
by this Mean Economics 404
business administration course.

Yes, but it sounds more hopeful
as win+win contrasted
with Cooperative Median Economics 101.

Standard
Light-painted human figures dancing in a circle near a lake under the Milky Way at night
Uncategorized

Lady Liberty’s Musical Comedy

A beautiful,
radiantly pregnant,
lady liberty
swings back and forth across this Left to Right predominating stage
of political history.

As she recesses toward Left stage climax
she recedes from LeftBrain audience’s co-evolving view
for one ecstatic, yet intellectually ambiguous, moment
sweeping a revolutionary change
away from monocultural history,
to re-emerge in royal blue skirt of virginal regenesis
and full-breasted naked multigenerational torso
laughing with us
at how hilarious this bicamerally polytultural opera
has resolved ultra-violating dissonance
and nuclear divisive fears
of nature-spirit fertile fusions.

This pregnant lady sings
in full-octave resonance
with us
as we become HerStorically ReStaged,
degenerating unwoken hypnotic LeftBrain trance
to once again regeneratively engage
nondual co-empathic stage presence

Swirling swings of spiraling inside/outside
mind/embodied-consciousness,
as day invites dream
dawning yet another radiant
singing,
liturgically dancing
Gaian evensong.

We’re not even theoretically together
until this humane Lady Liberty sings
co-operatively with us,
globally togathering,
consuming and producing full-octave resonant resolutions,
resolving swinging spirals
Left to Right to regenerate Left again
toward Crown/Root
Sage/Muse eco-dominantly resonant circles
away from YangLeft dominating over YinRight.

YinRight inductions reconnecting
religioning toward more transparently empowering operas,
replacing patriarchal economic terrorism
with matriarch/patriarch musical-comedy
agapic feelings leading erotic thoughts

Cooperatively owned economics
with bipartisan co-governing politics,
no longer waiting to conjoin
this synergetic singing
pregnant Gaia’s
laughing full-term compassions.

Standard
Sunset over ocean with waves breaking on rocky beach and cliffs
Uncategorized

Cooperative Feministas

Cooperative Feministas
are not quite so much Competitive Manifestos.

In David Holmgren’s introduction to Permacultural Therapeutic Design,
he contrasts “Industrial Culture” with “Sustainable Culture”
kind of like comparing macho LeftBrain fundamentalist culture
with feminist RightBrain enculturation, nurturance, resonance
over the longer-term scenaria,
rather than shorter-term dementio.

Anyway, Holmgren recognizes we could choose alternative words
for labeling these two contrasting, appositional, cultures.

We might sometimes choose
Competitive Culture v Cooperative Culture,
or Capital-Accrual v Nutrition-Dispersal,
sort of like the difference between hunting down and killing the defense
as compared to gathering and feeding the vegan edibles,
or Colony Acquisitional
(e.g. slaves and other exploitive ways of acquiring cheap manual, and especially womanual, labor)
v Creolizing ReGenerative
(like mixing multicultural spices contributed in pay-it-forward co-invested development of a robust Stone Soup
accessible to all with cooperatively managed ownership)

Or LeftBrain dominant Patriarchal Business as anthropocentrically usual)
v Right-Left Matrimonial bicameral co-passion

Or degenerative LoseMInd/LoseBody ZeroSum
anti-ecological
entropic 2nd Principle
of closed Upper-Caste Framing From-Above
triggering reactive systems
against ReGenerative Win/Win NonZeroSum
Positive Deviance

Cooperative revolutions and devolutions, too
because what goes politically up
must also at least partially come back down
and what grows out
must also economically recess back in

But, if Holmgren was familiar with Buckminster Fuller’s
Synergetic EcoSystemic Theory,
he might also have chosen
Precessive Political Culture v Recessive Economic Culture.

Precessive toward PreAcclimation of PolyCulturally Convex-Ecstasy
upward and outward extension trends
implying their reverse cobinary
inevitable intention,
Recession toward ReAcclimation ConCave-Within-Embryonic,
potential to be born again

Convex is the top of a forward surfing wave
of temporal-flowing energy,
information,
while concave is the subsequent indrawing trough,
a renewing ebb of what had been that precessive crest,
now reacclimating inward and downward,
more deeply resonant
toward a renewing polyculturally inclusive
recycling balance.

Each polarity represents an appositional tension,
with all the cultural risks of revolutionary eruptions
growing toward violent hypertension
and anthropocentric repressive recessive despair

All the multicultural opportunities
of evolving re-creative regenerative tensions
toward therapeutic midway Tipping Points
of ecosystemic ecological balance,
cooperatively sustainable at both highly localized
and global-planetary scales
of empowering co-empathic trust,
more culturally dominant,
more sustainable,
than mutually antipathic distrust.

While this suggests our hopes lie in our combined powers
of cooperatively active love
and our degenerative despair lies within any further stressing increases
in uneven autocratic powers,
terrorizing showers
of competitive
increasingly rabid
over-populated behavior
of elites v non-elites

Monoculturing
monopolistic
monochromatic
monotheistic disdain,
fueling each ego’s sense of selfish competitive gain
at the expense of Others left behind
and below

Including future non-anthropological generations
lost to our zero-sum entropic
anthro-inflicted loss;
reacting to each Other defensively
as if we lived on a Closed-Earth
cut off from atmosphere
and Solar System

which, of course,
we don’t
unless anthro-supremacists choose
to continue playing uber capitalist
colonizing
Industrial Culture
zero-sum exhausted Got-Game theories

Holmgren helpfully adds a chart of comparative/contrasting characteristics
of his Industrial v Sustainable Cultures,
which I will supplement in brackets
intending to nuance these Either Yang Or Yin
oppositional cultures
into a more regenerative Both Yang And Yin
appositional bilateral enculturation,
premised on LeftBrain precessive Yang falling back
in love with RightBrain recessive Yin:

Non-renewable and Renewable

Linear [continuous acceleration] and Cyclical [seasonal-spiral],

Consumption [extraction, piracy] and Storage [conservation, protection],

Centralized [autocratic, exclusive] and Distributed Network [democratic, inclusive],

Fast [short-term perspective] and Slow [long-term cooperative]

Centre [Yang, Upper,Inner-Caste] and Edge [Yin, Lower,Outer-Caste]

Episodic eruption [revolution] and Rhythmic stability [evolution]

Reductionist and Wholistic

Masculine and Feminine

Holmgren’s chart of this massive tsunami,
of both human population and consumption of fossil-fueled energy,
crests right now where you and I are living together
and is now beginning a growing permacultural-regenerative cooperative de-spiraling descent
back down to a healthy and multiculturally safe population base by 2500
that is modestly increased over the year 1500.

Disrupting in these DisUniting States
playing LoseAnthro/LoseEarth
economic anti-ecological co-relationship
political 0-sum partisan Trump cards,
I realize how far our kids have to fall
apart together

Before Cooperative Feministas
are not quite so much Competitive Manifestos.

Standard
Intertwined blue and gold glowing spirals above stone ruins with runes under night sky
Uncategorized

The Fourth Principle

The Fourth Principle of Win-humanity/Win-Earth
Permaculture Design (D. Holmgren):
“Apply self-regulation and accept feedback.”
might be understood as an implied corollary
of the Golden Rule.

Why?
The sins and blessings of reactive patriarchy
and responsive matriarchy
are revisited by children
unto the seventh generation.

If we are to develop healthy and robust democratic self-governance
then we must grow cooperative ownership and stewardship of feedback systems,
especially from those whose outcomes are least robust
among our slowly extending global family
of interdependent organisms
and our sacred natural environments.

Feedback comes in two spiraling circles,
virtuously healthy-positive,
which often has some form of symbiotic, synergetic, metamorphic dimension
to love’s transformative evolution,
and viciously pathological-negative
caste-preservative devolution.

Resilient self-regulation requires of us
to anticipate and accept both polarities of feedback.

To welcome both kinds, especially when they are offered together,
within some nondualistic cobinary frame
of appositional dipolar reference,
to neurosystemically experience gratitude for both
painful risk and pleasure opportunity,
organic life’s apparent blessings and curses.

So, whether Republican or Democrat,
or something Liberating Green in-between,
an important litmus test for the savvy political consumer
and tax-paying producer
of national and state and local leadership,
is mature stewardship experience of more perfect unions

Which we sometimes ignore
at our own disgruntled peril,
and at further peril “unto seven generations”
of potentially robust
healthy win/win
polyculturally planning
self-governing regenerators

Bodhisattva PeaceWagers and CoInvestors
in Salvific GoodNews CoRedemption:

  1. How has this candidate for public office
    demonstrated and grown mature self-regulation
    in personal and public economic and political empowering life?

Essentially a question to compare cooperative ownership
and compassionate governance
that resists rabidly competitive elitism,
upper-caste preserving
anthropocentrism
nationalism
and narcissism.

  1. How has this candidate demonstrated growth
    in win+win bipartisan capacity
    to co-empathize,
    co-intelligently learn from,
    and become grateful for,
    positive and negative feedback
    in personal and public economic and political life?
    How might this compare
    to your own trauma-informed life,
    both organic body natural
    and sacred mind spiritual?

Perhaps economically kleptocratic
and politically autocratic public persons
we have been electing and hiring
to apply self-regulation and accept feedback
are giving us to-be-expected answers
to the absence of wiser public sector questions,
too pathologically short-term focused
and anthropocentrically narrow-minded

Questions unmindful of Fourth Principle self-governing potential
for more robust Golden Rule healthy democracy outcomes
unto the seventh win/win regeneration.

David Holmgren, Co-Originator of the Permaculture Concept, reflective of the Gaia Hypothesis.

Fourth Principle from “Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability”, 2002

Standard
Digital left brain half with circuits and organic right brain half with swirling neurons
Uncategorized

Growing Healthier Humanity

A significant line might be drawn
between long-term permaculture design
and agribusiness,
improved this year production
through better and more expansive chemistry,
soil and water and air and light pollution.

We might draw a parallel contrast
between inclusive Earth-nurturing politics
and elitist anthropocentrism

Between human unnatural dispirited purpose
and Earth-nature’s felt wealth
of healthy co-passionate meaning

Between divine cooperation
inducing continuous Yin-flow
belonging in joy
and human competition
deducing discontinuous Yang-strength
of longing to restore Earth Justice

Between cooperative stewardship
and anti-ecological autonomy of human nature’s
competitive capital-dominant rulership.

From a LeftBrain deductive dominant perspective
this line looks like Old School preservation,
of mutual antipathy.
Yet, from a cooperative Left-Right mindbody perspective
this same line
looks and feels
like a dipolar appositional space
for incubating heuristic co-empathic trust

For significant deep learning Both-And co-empathy,
rather than necessarily always and only Either-Or antipathy,
appositionally benign rather than always
and everywhere bipolar toxic

A nonviolently co-passionate practice
of egoMe/ecoWe
+1/-(-0) cobinary
peace-making perspective.

Just as Either-Us/Or-Them cognition
follows Win v Lose
not health-effective outcomes,
while Both-Us/And-Them follows Win+Win
bipartisan transactional resilience outcomes
for EarthGame Day and Night
compassionate Earth-wealth continuance.

So, suppose,
both UpperCaste and LowerCaste positions,
at the risk of oversimplifying a multiculturally caste situation

Republican nationalistic agri-vating business
merely an appositional uncreative distraction
from Democratic polyculture delighting designs
and multicultural power planning

For CoOperative Earth Ownership
and ReGenerative TransForming Governance,
still including some degenerative-decomposing functions,
yet without recreating a runaway waste stream
nor a runaway personal, family, community,
or national nutritional, financial, or health-assurance deficit.

That’s what’s been up-caste
and down-caste
within my bicameral Yang/Yin mind.
What’s been co-evolving with you
and your unconditional love-extending family?

Standard
Balance scale with factory pollution on one side and beautiful landscape on the other
Uncategorized

Sacred Ecology Meets Game Theory

The healthiest and wealthiest ecological objective
of designing and playing life
is to optimize potential for continuing reiterative relationships
and transactions,
positive communications
and communions,
as long as possible.

Win v Lose
Either Ego-inside Or Eco-outside
InCaste v OutCaste
HomoSapiens v OtherSapiens
ZeroSum monopoly games

Such as unmitigated capitalism
and narcissism
and patriarchalism
and monotheism
quickly devolve

Diminish down to one supremacist ego-political Winner,
which leaves the rest of us behind
as out-caste Losers.

Yet if this relentlessly Might Makes Right game were ever done,
the omnipotent Winner only wins
to lose our organically cooperative
belonging together
network of interdependent relationships,
intelligent transactions
(whether “artificial” or “biological,”
digital or analogical),
authentically bilateral communications.

Win/Win
BothEgo/AndEco
Not-Not Positive NonZero-Sum
double-binding equi-valent virtue norms,
such as Golden Ruled,
optimize options of Tit-for-Tat reiterative
continuously vital,
“wrapping in” integral anticipation,
gifting-forward virtues like “benefit of the doubt,”
delayed democratizing reward
robustly continuous, contagious pleasure,
unto panentheistic perpetuity
of this same naturally cooperative
individual mind/body
and anthropological/ecological
sacred/organic virtuous gaming network.

Win v Lose narcissism is too often confused with messianism,
like patriarchal Zionism overwhelming patristic Judaism,
in which
individualistic and nationalistic pretensions
of in-caste efficacy
are betrayed by narcissistic decline,
like Goliath losing a War, to loser shepherds

Win v Lose nationalism will,
if too monoculturally successful,
cause its own disastrous fall
from sacred grace.
organic place
sacred space
organic face
sacred race
toward virtuous communication games.

It is possible to have a healthy interdependent national culture
more matrimonially receptive than patrimonially aggressive

Not narcissistically nationalistic,
more inter-religiously co-intelligent,
cooperatively messianic,
playing nicely, and joyously,
with other win/win uniting nations
nurturing healthy Earth subclimates
and landscapes
winning polyculturally regenerative outcomes
for pantheistic children
and animistic saplings
and buddhist buds

It is possible to avoid personal and political messiah complexes,
lethally elitist exceptionalism and nationalism,
by recognizing we can choose to play
a healthy co-messianic
co-empathic
co-intelligent game
for waging bodhisattva peace
and dharma compassion.

Messiah complexes are idolatrously narcissistic,
about what I can control
buy
dominate to save the unwashed outcastes
from their unenlightened selves.

Co-messiahs are about what we are One-AnthoMind/EarthBody doing together
to co-redeem our holistically regenerative EarthTribe.

“[Anthropocentric] Permaculture is not the [polyculturally win/win] landscape,
or even the skills of organic gardening,
sustainable farming,
energy efficient [natural] building
or eco-village development
as such,
But it can be used
to [integrally] design,
establish,
manage and improve
these and all other [synergetic] efforts
made by individuals,
households
and communities
(and nations)
towards a sustainable future.”
David Homgren, “Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability”

The healthiest objective
of playing long sacred life
is to optimize Win/Win relationships.
whether speaking of an individual organism
or an individual interdependent nation
or an individual co-intelligent
co-empathic
co-passionately pleasing species.

Standard
A river meandering in a yin-yang shape surrounded by dense green forest and hills
Uncategorized

Civilizing Savages

I stumbled over Paul Tillich’s reflection
on the Messiah’s other Great Commission.

The Great Commission we learned in Sunday School
was to go out and convert the barbarians
and savages to Christianity.

Yet this other Great Commission feels like a necessary prerequisite,
like requiring Statistics 1
before wandering on into the further abstractions
of long-term probabilities
and improbabilities
that savages could become barbarians
and barbarians become pagans
and pagans become animated civilians
of pantheistic inter-religious wildness,
as recovered by anthropocentric
monotheistic Statistics 2.

Tillich’s version of St Matthew (5:48) reads
“You must be all-inclusive as your heavenly Father is all-inclusive.”

Jesus has been exegeting perfect love
as favorably contrasted against not-so-perfect love,
and Their conclusion summarizes with
YHWH is Earth’s perfection of all-inclusive love

So this is also our humane divining destiny,
this profound all-inclusiveness,
which would seem to necessarily include
nature worshipping wildness
and MightMakesRight barbarians
within us all.

But, what I wonder,
from my flawed redemptive perspective,
is how could becoming all-inclusive perfection of love
progress anything less than taught by God the enlightening Father
and engaged by Gaia the co-empowering Mother?

These two faces
co-arising nondual all-inclusive love
of hunters and gatherers,
the competitive Patriarchal
and the cooperative Matriarchal
barbarians

Universal-Yang/unitarian-Yin
win/win
bicamerally civilizing Left cognitive minds
inside Right intuitive wilderness bodies.

To perceive oneself as one of the holy civilized
rather than barbaric unwashed
seems to deny indigenous adaptation,
pantheistic adoption,
co-opting cooperative co-passion
extracting from what was polyculturally peaceful
all-inclusively before anthropocentric civilization.

To comprehend myself as civilizing
speaks first to maturing all-inclusive love,
including all the YangNature and YinSpirit
of my wilderness heritage

Embracing my own TerribleTwos savagery,
remembering adolescent hormonal waves
of public supremacy v private intimacy.

To this day,
I must eat when I am hunger,
drink when I am thirst,
sleep when I feel tired
of all disintegrating opportunities.

This healthy development of all-inclusive love
includes the first clue
how to share good co-redeeming news
to be found within every organic tradition,
every rhythmed transition
of which we are each a necessary muse,
but never emotionally sufficient
apart,
in our savage through civil maturation,
co-passionately extending acclimation.

Holistic spirited, growing pantheistically inclusive,
holonic co-redemption excludes prejudicial partiality

A process
in which every interdependent sequence
(stage, frame, network, co-acclimating set)
and inter-relational sample
re-presents the organic whole
of all-inclusive sacred holiness.

A synergetic progress
toward 100% domesticated Yang non-zero probability
that any dynamic state (stage, frame, paradigm) will recur
AND
zero-sum improbabiity
that any co-acclimating organic state
will recur empty of Yintegrity.

Perfectly all-inclusive bilateral passion
like YHWH’s win/win
Gaia Hypothesis

Holy co-acclimation,
from RightElder brain stem savage
Either LeftYang wealth
or RightYin health

Out-caste or in-caste
dissociative identity disformation,
through barbaric LeftBrain verbal monotheistic dominance
versus Elder RightBrain nonverbal pantheistic prominence
of adolescent coming of bicamerally intelligent age

Open to belonging
in longing
for more redemptive cooperations,
all-inclusive polyamorous acclimations

Organically responsive animists
long before
reactive irreligious monotheists

Maturing toward more all-inclusive Left/Right
co-arising Sage/Muse nonduality
of profoundly integral Win/Win love,
within as without,
ego-ethotic as eco-erotic.

Reuniting wilderness-loving civilians
with universally divine inspirations,
organically indigenous acclimations
becoming even healthier democratic news
about both private and public co-passion trends
and co-investment probabilities.

From this view,
it seems curious that culture influencers,
like Popes,
would look back through vast histories of spirited experience
and recover only platonic memories
of God’s priestly invisible hand
and mind
within peak experience Sage passioned heads
but not Muse pleasured bodies

Especially within our long co-acclimating history
of mother-wombs nurturing perfect all-inclusive love,
maturing indigenous infants into savage two year olds

Then letting maturation go
through barbarically wild
hormone-drenched adolescence
pregnantly predicating co-redemptive adulthood
of all-inclusive genders
and polyamorous gender preferences.

What could be more priestly stewardship,
and yet also prophetic promise,
than redeeming blood-baptism’s wilderness birth?

Nurturing healthy animistic support
through all our holy all-inclusive
neurodiverse stages
within WinLeft-WinRight

Bicamerally co-arising
barbarically savage peak experiences
extending all-inclusive love,
transforming the Bodhisattva’s non-othering
Great Inclusive Commission.

Standard
Two people sitting side by side on rocky ground watching the sunrise over mountains with mist
Uncategorized

Baby Boomers and Bummers

Most Baby Boomers started out hoping to leave life
having continued our Great ReGenerativity,
progressively recycling boundless growth
of optimal Win-Wealth is also Win-Health.

We are the last human generation
with confidence we could leave more than we have taken in.
To give back,
to pay forward
investment in Earth’s cooperative health and safety insurance,
re-assurance.

In this early post-millennial era,
we have a great transitional dissonance
between those who continue believing it is merely realistic,
rationally nihilistic,
to give up on this hopelessly disconnected
non-renewable
non-inheritable dream,
already not accessible to human nature’s consciousness
of internal and external climate disruptions.

And, on the other hand,
there remain those of relentless active faith
that we are here at this time,
invested in this transitional moment,
increasing Win/Win potential
transforming short- and long-term
evolving compassionate lifetimes

To learn from Father Sun’s warming voice of Wind
to balance healthy consumption
with wealthy production
of perennial renewables

To listen
for life’s relentlessly springing up reinvestment
opportunities,
not lifetime for ignoring Win v Lose waste,
risking positive neuro-energy’s potential peacetime resources.

As we turn from seeking regenerative integrity
for the span of one humanely natural generation,
toward the span of one humane-divine
MotherEarth FatherSun prime co-relational life span,
old monotheistic WinWe v LoseThey issues,
flying under banners of nationalistic narcissism,
fade into the waste stream of survival of the bullyist

More synergetically renewed by a new EarthTribal cooperative ownership,
a self-with-other Win/Win democratizing
inter-religious identity
nurturing caregiving Light
and receiving Power

Healthy compassion
with all organisms not pathologically hoarding wealth
of divisive nations,
of dissociated egos,
as this new Left with Right
double-binding
ego/eco-intelligence
for evolving renewable lifetime opportunities
and compassionately deniable risks of addiction
to anthropocentric narcissism.

Standard