Tag Archives: economics

Uncategorized

Merging with Co-Mentoring Light

Further conversation with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 184, 2011, SelectBooks, NY. My co-arising commentary in brackets.

“What I have discovered is that the very same [integrating] principle applies when we are trying to catalyze emergence at the [internal] level of [eco]consciousness and [of external eco]culture.

The [political and economic language balance] conditions must be [co-operatively] right.

In fact, I often use the metaphor of a ‘New Being’ to describe this emergent cosmocentric [holon of Sacred Earth] cultural potential [for cooperative revolution thru co-arising eco-consciousness of Ego as EcoOther].

Just as individual [RNA-fueled] cells came together to make up a larger [DNA-composted] organism, [imaginatively] autonomous, evolving individual [holonic-holy] human beings consciously come together to give rise [co-arise/co-decompose] to a dynamic greater [Beloved Community] whole.

And this emergent potential of [r]evolutionary [cooperative political with economic] Enlightenment is completely dependent upon those individual cells—those [fractally-syntaxed] autonomous, evolving [life-]beings—making the effort to understand [to give voice to] and be a [healthy loving] living expression of the [intuitively-deductively] inconceivably delicate balance of [Earth language] conditions that make it possible for [Her] to come into existence.” [to rejoin our cooperative thriving as Anthro of Earth’s Tribes, mutually parasitic eco-pilgrims toward (0)Mega ReLigion of ConScience, EcoCentric Consciousness.]

Standard
Uncategorized

Esoteric EcoTerra

Nomial is to Relational
as
Subject is to Object
as
progenitorNoun is to actionVerb
as
Stimulus is to Response
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural is to Polycultural
as
+Yin is to +Yang/(-,-)Yin balancing
as
+/- Bicameral Owl Medicine is to full-bodied Moose Medicine’s
PolyCultural Timeless Party

Uracil articulates Love/Synergy
as Moose dominant positive.

Cytosine articulates Co-Integrative Peace
as Owl precessive/camouflage (shy) positive

Guanine articulates FearMongering
as Moose recessive-negative over-powering

Adenine articulates Anxiety/Anger/Depression
as Owl recessive-oppressed negative.

NounYin evokes VerbYang,
gender and culture equivalency of value

SelfValue emerges through MooseMed progenitive stimulation
with
OwlMeds bicamerally responsive to Other as Worthy,
together
EcoLogical In-Formation bilateral cooperation
network.

This bilaterality of seasoned polynomial language
emerges
assimiliterative enthymematic resonance
with
assimilaterative geometric assonance
regenerating
ecological wisdom compost for optimizing healthy wealth.

To respect
to look back, to regard from our past,
nature’s language is to empathize
with where we have chosen to come from.
To reconnect/repassion nature’s language,
inclusive of human,
but not so much dominated thereby,
is to empathize with Other’s basic right of freedom
toward positive dynamic functionality
for regenerative cooperation,
synergetic health,
love.

Owl’s YinYin Medicine for balancing eco-normics
is progenitive/precessive
toward
Yang Moose Medicinal PolyCultural Political Power
inclusive of all Earth’s universal positive healthy nature.

Cooperative economic peace is to yin’s Owl Medicine
as ecompassionate political power is to yang’s Moose Medicine.

We co-mentor
seeing
smelling
hearing
tasting
touching
feeling
absorbing
racing
engendering
comprehending
regenerating
Earth and Other as Yangprocessive-Yinrecessive Full-Fractal Harmonics,
not so much climatic Yang Left-brain domination,
but not too Yin Right-brain politically struggling shy of healthy ego/eco balanced esteem.

PostMillennial Taoists
cognize balance speaking through all Nature’s Earth-bound voices,
Nature does not always speak YinKin kind,
but Earth is not so Yang unkind either,
in full-double Namaste resonant response.

Spiritual Subjects are to Natural Objects
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural Political Language is to Polycultural EcoNormic Outcomes
as
PreMillennialism is to Post-Polypathic Millennialism
as
Struggling-Against Contentious Living co-arises Struggling-With Contented Loving
as
Bicameral Function co-arises Positive In-Formating Regeneration
as
Becoming is to Being

Standard
Uncategorized

Conversation with Chris Santos-Lang

My internal conversation with you, Kramer, Bressan, and all our microbes, together, in brackets.

What “Letting People [and Places, including Earth] Be Themselves” Means

Chris Santos-Lang

In “Humans as Superorganisms: How Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes, and Other Selfish [Mutually-Struggling] Entities Shape Our Behavior,” Peter Kramer and Paola Bressan present evidence that we are [nondual] “not unitary individuals,” but rather “collections of human and nonhuman [RNA/DNA-regeneratively syntaxed] elements that…in an incessant [cooperatively contentious] struggle [default as positive ‘with’ and sometimes ‘negative reverse-synaptic’ against], jointly define who we are.” The research they highlight challenges those of us who want to ‘let people be themselves’ to explain precisely what we mean by “themselves [and ourselves.” If people are [nondual] not unitary individuals, then what could “themselves [as ourselves]” refer to?

The notion that we are not unitary individuals is not new. [Plato didacted the interdependence of intrinsically social beings, and the neoplatonists went wild with that core holonic universal view.] Quantum physicists have pointed out that every atom of our bodies is entangled with the entire universe [inclusive of both Bohm’s Explicate Order and Implicate Order and Buckminster Fuller’s Convex-Positive-Special Case v. Concave-Double-Bilateral-Reverse-String-Temporal Metaphysical Interior Eco-Cooperative TransParent Function-more or less], biologists have pointed out that less than 2% of those atoms remain in us for over a year, and psychologists have pointed out that the mechanisms of our [positive] cognition typically extend beyond our brains to include scratchpads, musical instruments, calculators, and the Internet [and extend back through time toward the distant progenitive-as-regenerative origins of fractal-syntaxed RNA]. Kramer and ressan add merely that our [economic] values [as objectives] and [political] preferences [as subjective progenitors]–what we call our “soul”–is just as entangled with our environment as are our other aspects.

In my opinion, the most compelling branch of their argument is the one relating to microbes. Only about 10% of the various types of [RNA/DNA fueled] cells our bodies require to flourish are [DNA] human. The rest are [RNA-uracil-rooted] microbes. Although most of the microbe studies cited by Kramer and Bressan were conducted on mice, it seems clear that the decisions humans make–how we vote, whom we marry, whether we commit a crime–depend upon which microbes dominate our internal [autonomic] ecosystem at the time. Thus, we can lose our [perception of autonomous] identity–the person our friends know us to be may cease to [monopolistically] inhabit our [mind-]bodies–not just through a lobotomy, but also through some combination of antibiotics and probiotics which irreversibly [or reversibly? I wonder?] tip the balance of power among the microbes within us.

Such microbes might be called parasites of our [mutually parasitic] bodies, but they cannot be parasites of [with?] our selves, for they are an essential part of who we are. Kramer and Bressan would argue that our rights belong to our entire internal [and external] ecosystem[ic landscapes], including those microbes. Laws to protect you [and Earth] must therefore take the form of laws to protect an ecosystem, not necessarily protecting particular microbes, but protecting [mutually parasitic reverse-hierarchically structured, increasingly cooperative metasystemic, with bilateral (concave/convex) spacetime, co-prehensive] balance among them. This sets the stage for shocking reform of our legal system and conception of human [as nature’s spiritua/ergodic/ionic/cogravitational] rights [of freedom to cooperate balancing freedom from struggling-against competition of Other].

Perhaps the paradigm of “selfish-survivalist” genes has been unduly influenced by a culturally jaundiced interpretation of Darwinian evolutionary struggle. But the default setting on Darwinian evolution is positive-regenerative, which would suggest struggling with others to maintain co-gravitational balance, perhaps defining what I mean by eco-normic cooperation. Nature’s biological systems seem to struggle against mutually negative {lose, lose} eco-gravitational disbalancing choices, which might be paradigmed as competitive eco-politics. Struggling is normatively neutral; “selfish” is not, and assumes a monocultural level of competitive-default objectives that is not supported by the regenerative fact that cooperative polyculturally organic nature, life, exists at all.

Summary Notes, Dillenbeck:

Cooperative economic subjects lead toward competitive, politically-healthy, objectives of eco-consciousness.

Struggling with suboptimized relationships avoids over-attachment to a moderately-healthy Win-Lose poly-econormic status-quo.

Struggling against suboptimally dissonant-yet-static relationships avoids over-detachment from a perceived-as-toxically-competitive (over-heated/drama climate) status-quo.

For more from Chris Santos-Lang, visit http://www.grinfree.com

Standard
Uncategorized

Romeo and Juliet: The ReMix

Three voices required,
Professor,
and two students:
Yang as Fr. Time
YinYin as Sr. Gaia

In a college classroom with Win-Win Game Theory written on whiteboard.

Professor:
Today we are going to role play
a Win-Win enculturation game.

We will define enculturation as
‘the combination of political and economic reiterative relationships and transactions
within a communicating network
of choice-making.’

The absence of political-economic co-arising redundancy
generates systemic dissonance,
suboptimized positive outcomes, at best,
in which positive information is lost,
putting this enculturation game at risk of turning from Win-Win,
to Win-Lose.

This would result in a suboptimized and, to that extent,
polypathological outcome,
useful for recognizing opportunities to do better,
to do good and fair and justice,
to do Being, fully cooperatively eco-balanced consciousness.
Maybe.
We’ll see.

Fr. Time: [In an appropriately low gravelish slow-sucking voice]
I need to play Yang.

Sr. Gaia: [In a lovely round full-chested soprano]
I want to play yang as Yin.

Professor:
Good, good. OK.

So. let’s imagine that Yang,
played by Fr. Time,
is Romeo Logos,
and Yin,
played by Sr. Gaia,
is Juliet Mythos.

But, this is a Win-Win Game,
so Juliet, of the Mythos family,
chooses to stay planted on lovely Earth
because she loves the Cinderella story,
so maybe she’ll just sleep on her decision about what to do with her life,
and see what happens later in the Prince Charming
as Romeo Logos
Department of her mythic romantic life.

With Juliet asleep,
Romeo Logos storms through life’s stage all blood and thunder.
Wakes Mythos,
and they are filled with co-passionate ecstasy for themselves,
each other,
and all of Earth,
and all of Earth’s Tribes,
and all of the above live happily ever after.

[pause] Why is that not a more satisfying,
healthier
story for every time our language and culture
our political and economic outcomes
trend toward a despairing climatic precipice?

Fr. Time: [speaking as gravelish Yang—2 packs a day, at least]
I feel so used up. My health, vibrancy, robust vitality fades.

Sr. Gaia: (as Yin)
All your over-heated competitive passions for violence and revolution have left me sore! So good riddance, we are finding our Midway, balancing our deductive language Logos family and our inductive autonomic Mythos Memory

of +Romeo-synapse = double-negative Juliet’s optic fractal message to disremember 50% despair = “lose”

as +UracilRomeo = CytosineJuliet, double-bound reverse-temporal Uracil (concave bilaterally equivalent fold).

Fr. Time:
Sometimes your Gaia Story is too negentropically dissonant with the Logos family’s Golden Rule.

Sr. Gaia:
Yes, but only when Yin as Yang and Yin as Yin are not in appositional alignment, and Yin always plays as a metaphysical future or past tense mythic noun, icon. Yin is never real-time, but half past time and half future time, working her karmic grace to keep these two together.

Fr. Time:
Left alone, you cannot yet speak?

Gaia:
Yes, my Romeo, I need both our co-gravitational “Yes to Life” enculturations,
your politically powerful Logos of permacultural history,
and our economically abundant flowing Mythos
of polycultural real-time double-bound Continuous Quality Improvement resolving outcomes.

Our Midway.
Wu-wei.
Co-Tipping Point of perpetually balancing harmonics.

Fr. Time:
You always were the more strategic Win-Win cooperative player.

Sr. Gaia:
Oh, Father, I bet you say that to all the girls, and boys,
but you and I both know and love
our co-arising eco-consciousness
of balanced Win-Win culture.

Professor:
OK. Very good. So first, Fr. Time and Sr. Gaia,
how do you think that game was going?
Any concerns or insights about Win-Lose suboptimization?

Sr. Gaia:
It feels like Yang is too Left-brain dominant,
too competition-default.

I realize it’s Yang’s role to carry the dense, hot, close inhalation side of gravity’s bi-elliptical wave toward the future,
on which this Universe surfs in timeless eternity,
and I value those political and economic qualities and quantities,
forms and functions,
all those verbal dynamic kins of cultural incarnations
that must continue to emerge
for Win-Win outcomes.

Yet, I am terrified of becoming too thin,
too cool and shy,
too absent,
too chaotically dispersed,
dissonant,
despairing,
suffering,
disappearingly absent,
dead inside,
because I do so love this time as Earth.

I hope we can grow more accustomed
to unearthing together,
Logos with Mythos,
science with religion,
permacultural politics and procedures with polycultural outcomes
in bicamerally balanced sight.

Fr. Time:
Wouldn’t know what to add to our full-octave throated soprano’s resonant RNA-fractal ring of life’s four temporal seasons,
folding and unfolding her permacultural development Wisdom,
and culture,
and language of yangish verbs
as yinyin mythic nouns.

Professor:
I followed you right up to the last part.
What is this Yang-verb with Yin-shadowy noun relationship?

Fr. Time:
Like ‘Earth’ is a yin noun
in PolyCultural language,
while ‘unearth’ is a yang verb.
If ‘UnEarth’ were used as a negative-polynomial noun,
then I guess that would be most everything we know nothing about
except perhaps through our imagined thinning,
cooling,
dispersing future wave of not-yet gravitational absorption
into this great revolving wheel
of co-arising co-gravitational
Win-Win Being.

Professor:
Well, thank you Fr. Tim and Sr. Gaia, Namaste.

So far, well done.

Let the Win-Win Game continue,
Time’s receding bilateral wave
greeted by Mythic 3-dimensional future-as-now space,
spinning on our mythic enculturating story of time as space,
gravitation co-arising function
as a 4-fractal RNA-seeded place
with 3-dimensional spatial forms
within each 1-dimensional mythic bicameral NOW
nomial
notch in Time’s evolutionary emergent flow.

Standard
Uncategorized

Gaia and Fr. Time Are Lovers: True InFormating Scandal

Gaia’s love first embraces Earth’s tribes
who then embrace Her back
through Gaia’s co-redeemer enculturation gift,
pay-it-forward grace of permacultured history,
karma of EarthTribe’s economy,
mutually-parasitic subsidiarity
embracing universally regenerate Host
in political-through-personal empowering solidarity
of EarthTribe’s Eco-Passionate Universal Rights.

She paid the health assurance rent
we’ve been redeeming ever since.

And so it is
that Ego’s love invites EcoEarth’s co-passion,
mutually held holy compassion,
synergy of with for Earth’s co-redemptive Rights
embracing Gaia’s Universal Nest.

Not sure where this climatic
and over-heated story
of bicamerally diastatic love
as balance harmonic octaves
starts,
because love is timeless
in this sense
that it can go forward
only as it has emerged from past
except in bicameral systems,
where love,
as synergetically dynamic time of presence
is perceived and comprehended
as bilaterally unfolding.

For example,
bicameral lungs
autonomically know the difference and sameness
of Yang inhalation formation
and Yin exhalation flowing out frequencies.

As bicameral hearts
autonomically feel the difference and dipolar symmetry
of inflation toward diastatic Yang power
and recession away deep flat-line trending
toward static Yin-aptic Basic Attendance.

As bicameral mind-bodies comprehend
this balancing and permaculturing love story
of Universal Earth
and bilateral Fr. Time 0’Mega Science.

Once upon bilateral time,
Earth Day dawned her Birth of Passion Story,
co-passion story,
passion story,
reading with passive purgative passion
Her co-redemptive narrative
of cooperative
mutual subsidiarity
co-arising messianism.

Asked Earth of her ScienceSun,
“Can you truly love a rock,
or any of those static, sometimes dissonant, objects,
like egocentrism
anthro-centrism
or a steel-grey slate wall?”

No,
love is co-relational,
different than unilateral basic appreciation,
Basic Attendance
emerges love as positive enthymeme.

“How can we attend to love’s co-passion
in absence of its expressed return?
I fear I fade
my climate wilts
for lack of co-redemptive love
within my rightful seasons
of cooperative power
and ecological flow.”

“Your neutral economic science investments
display our true ecological incubator, and not, laboratory vestments.”

Universe’s comprehensive co-gravitating love
emerges now
enthymematic photosynthetic evolutionary compassion,
co-arising co-passion,
eco-consciousness
of Ego’s quintessentially ubiquitous
bicamerally balancing
RNA-syntaxed
sensory timelessness within metaphysicality.

“My children co-redeem.
PassionYang, child for deductively reducing suffering,
PeaceYinYin, instinctive child of kindness,
content
kinship
content-full
mindful,
together, twins of bipolar contention,
dipolar contentment.”

Redeemers,
unlike those returning wealth for health value,
receive a healthy/therapeutic advance
for services to be rendered later,
like paying one’s rent on the first of each day,
and month,
then redeeming that gifting-it-forward investment.
Redemption,
unlike a coincidental exchange,
co-arises a return
for a WinWin pay-it-forward investment.
Yang brings forth political power
for Yin’s ecological economic optimization flow,
as
Yin brings forth full EarthRights logical double-binding co-redemptive flow,
for Yang’s more inclusive political form of wealth: eco-therapeutic health.

Co-passionate peace
dipolar bicamerally harmonizing
with Earth’s full octave fractal form and function,
eternally regenerates
Fr. Time’s spatially econtented informational telus-dance
teleodance of co-intelligence
gazing through 4 equidimensional eco-consciousness seasons.

Gaia and Fr. Time’s permacultural affair
looms their co-redemptive weave
throughout TransMillennial PolyCultural Power.

Note: Provoked by an internal dialogue with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 183 (SelectBooks, 2011): “When you literally begin to feel the telos, or [Yang-in and Yin-ex] directionality, of the entire process moving in and through your own nervous system, that is when you directly experience that movement as a [4-dimensional spacetime] vertical impulse in your own [eco]consciousness. You see that where we are headed is never static or predetermined [nor diastatically redetermined]. You awaken to what I sometimes call the ‘radical indeterminacy’ of the [timeless NOW eco-echo] life-process itself. As conditioned and mechanical as much of it might seem, the fact is that in every moment there is the possibility for [organically emergent] novelty. In every moment there is the potential for something new [revolving from something old]. In every moment, there is room for [evolutionary] emergence. That’s the miracle of [positive] evolution [as interior-landscaped, synergetic integrative, unitarian, Beloved revolution with universal outcome of bicameral-balanced eco-consciousness].”  Some readers may see my Buckminster Fuller influence in comprehending positively dynamic evolution as synergetic (special case-subset) and love (metaphysical universal-Group Theory of co-arising zero-bilateral-elliptics).

Standard
Uncategorized

Wild Fire Management

I suspect you are right, that we get confused about the messages Earth gives us about what is optimally and sustainably healthy and inclusive of full diversity, including full-diversity of our anthro-centric neural systems, and degrees and oscillating waves of comparative mind-body health v. pathology.

When we measure the health of our political and economic forest, it would seem confusing and misguided to compare lifespans of the average organism within one forest to those of another, and thereby determine anything germane to comparative diverse “health-robustness” optimization of inter-species cooperative relationships . Although it might be interesting to compare the lifespans of the median organism–but maybe that’s what you meant, because the outcome measures are of trees, which should be about right in terms of the comparative internal diversity of Earth systems, but would be entirely wrong with regard to average lifespan of the entire incarnate biosystem within an ecosystem. We are essentially measuring the robustness of our temporal-Elders with median levels of regenetic-diversity balance in their endosymbiotic information processing and embryonic storage systems.

I think in Permaculture Design we learned that the old dead trees are best cut down and burned for fuel to heat our homes, allowing more room for a nearby medium tree to flourish, grow more robust, or perhaps even two or three trees to share this newly accessible ring of photosynthetic fuel.

What the forest seems to be saying to our “burn management” school of forest management, is to include age diversity in our measure of biosystemic diversity as a positive, and to assess each individual gift of the forest for its highest and best use, rather than trying to micromanage from on high. Facilitating trees of all ages  and digestive-breathing diversity of interrelationships is complex, requires considerable listening and discernment, and sitting together, showing up and showing to each other what we need to survive together.

The real measure of robust sustainable health is probably universally inclusive and unitarian-intended diversely welcoming, inviting political/economic environments. With trees and meditators and therapists we call this Basic Attendance, setting aside nutrient/neural-assumptions of cognitive/affective dissonance/pathology.

I suspect that mental health is mind health, and I suspect that our “mind” is not rationally reduced to a synonym for “brain” or even “head.” I further suspect that the combination of economic ecological health and political-private relational anthro-centric health are, for each of us, and for all of us. as cooperative co-mentors of health (because that’s what DNA is positively designed to do, that is DNA/RNA’s vocation, if you will, regeneratively sustainable health), the real-time currency of optimized Continuous Quality Improvement currently emerges, co-arises, as cooperative healthy-wealth care and perpetuation toward future healthy regenerators of all species.

Standard
Uncategorized

Eco-Teacher’s Pet Peeve

Teacher’s Pet Peeve

I am a teacher?
That’s what you hope?

If a teacher
engages students learning what and why and how
the teacher intends, and practices,
mentors,
co-walks the walk,
then,
no,
I suppose I am not a teacher,
or I have too seldom been an effective teacher.

On the other hand,
I have known few teachers,
or other lovers,
in my time.

Yes,
I do believe ecological mentors
make the Best Practice teachers.
But,
even better are co-mentoring agreements,
covenants,
to plant and care for our organic gardens together.

You
might apply that organic permacultural process
to your field
of incarcerated over-commodified and –domesticated adults
with collective mental health issues.

Then
maybe next year
this Polycultural Party might all agree
to teach someone
how to plant and care for
our organic prisoner garden of neglect
and toxic overpopulation
lacking light
and swimming in economic ecological health care issues.

Then
maybe next year
you would teach me
how to apply this rich fertile compost
to my work
with an increasingly autistic anthro-world
of peers and parents
chronically killing and bullying
polycultural eco-intelligence.
in this Great Transitional Time.

This political economy of learning
and discerning
looks at politics as power
and economics
as healthy flow of assets and resources
and divestment of pathological politics
of hoarding and competing
where giving-it-forward
and inclusive perma-culturally evolving co-operation
frames and hosts thickly wealthier options.

If teaching/learning flow
and balancing function
is sacred economics,
then political co-redemptive relationships are divine,
designed with cooperative intention
and co-arising orthopraxis.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Father Time’s Surprising Taoist Polintimations

Tell me,
Father Time,
if you would share this space
it would mean everything to me
to us, so kind,
which forms of integrative diversity
incarnate your highest priority,
most comprehensive,
social-political-economic-cultural issues:

1. Domestic economy flat-line trends,

2. International peace intent and praxis,

3. Universally perpetually optimizing CQI health care
practices and standards of outcome-production value,

4. Eco-centric and -logical regenerative revelation
in response to climatic, yet chronic, changes,
unbalanced monoculturating times,
evolutionary paradigmatic
as polydigital-language trending
symbiotic evolution?

Yes!
timelessly offered lifeskills Master Time.

Trying again:
In the unlikely event
that you have the capacity
to give a straight answer
to an eco-political question,
theoretically far afield from your more temporal concerns,

Which of these four options best fits
your crystal-ball signs of cultural impact,
empowerment,
hunger,
critical climatic co-responsiveness
should Quinnipiac College survey
synergetic trends
across most likely voters
in our next national election?

Oh, so glad you finally said so.
Let’s see…

Number One is too sad and hopeless
at either national or international levels,
but maybe if we interpreted “domestic”
as ‘familial”
and/or ‘local”
or even
“genetically tribal exegetical branches
and root systems of eco-enriching
in-co-arising-formination.”

it’s against our real time language rules
to make up language that does not meet
exe-culturating standards.

I would respond,
but I hardly know where to begin
reiterating the total number of double-negative
standards within your un-natural logos.
This has always been a problem for me,
knowing where to begin,
to end,
to continue our story.

Anyway,
Number Two glares too starry-eyed
for prickly realists,
academics,
attorneys and pyramid-structured financial insurance agents,
for struggling real property commodifiers
and landlords, and ladies, of Earth’s Commons.

Number Three is too “liberal-Clinton” associated,
in the U.S.,
which is one of the few places
on Earth
where health-assurance continues to be a debated political and economic issue,
rather than an Earth Health Rights
environmentally inclusive
ecological imperative
to respond to global critically screeching
wilting, extinguishing, refuge-seeking demands.

Number Four speaks most clearly
to our stormy TransMillennial emergence generation,
syncing health as following eco-centric polycultural network optimization trends
of YangForm with YinYinFunction.

So, for young adults
through infants
of all currently incarnating
and co-evolving species,
I suggest Number Four,
to optimize culturally transformative healthy wealth
clout–
both effective health outcomes
evinced through Best Permacultural Practice research,
deductive-empowered,
and
anthro-epic mythic-rooted definition
for Beloved Climaxing Unto Near Diastatic,
Eco-Centric Community,
with concomitant Positive Psychology,
communication reiterating-regenerating
co-arising trends
for and from public/private discernment,
reductive harmony meets inductive prediction.

Internal,
like external,
climatic change
continues to forewarn
we are over-armed with mutually intended ballistics
while under-anchored
with mutually co-arising ballastic in-formation;
organic Earth’s co-intelligent red sky
points both dusk and dawn
of this co-operating local/global economic network.

It is like pulling wisdom teeth
without appropriately timed
and functional anesthetics
to follow your run-on temporal syntax.
Father Time,
your words are too dense
for normal neural travel.

If you were consulting a potential political policy
to empower globally inclusive economic incubation,
which of the following four options
is your strategic choice
for mentoring Earth’s residents
as faithfully
and lovingly
and effectively
and regeneratively
as possible
through our internal
and external climatic need
for positive healthy enculturating revolution,
designed to logistically deliver
sustainable health outcomes
through life’s projected eternity
on planet Earth:

1 Eco-normic thermodynamic political balance?

2. Increasing healthy multisystemic ecotherapeutic relationships
between bio- and eco-systems?

3. Achieving an exegetically accepted
eco-logical polycultured metaparadigm
of analogic-steering
Fullerian Midway Tipping Points
as permacultural Yang/Yin
co-operative harmonic wu-wei discernment
for eco-climaxing regenerative outcomes,

4. (0)-square-root sprouting
our metaphysical spacetime eco-consciousness
on, in, of, by, through
bicameral 4-prime fractal
regenerate RNA-rooted
co-arising intelligence?

Cultural history might suggest
reiterating prior cycles of spiral-octave cultural evolution:

Number One gifts our nondual future
with TransParent NegErgodic
Co-Gravitational Cosmology,
giving birth to RNA
as Host of bilateral Time’s awareness
(that’s my familial line).

Number Two erupts RNA
eventually spawning Left-brain ego-dominant
deductive-languaged DNA’s
lexicon of Yang/Yin double-fractal
Zero-Centric octave sets of frequency,
placeholders of confluently exegetical
positive/negative synaptically reiterative
transgenerational memory.

Number Three barters co-operative political relationships
with co-arising economic optimization,
Us-Them [P=N(NP)]
Win-Win Gaming Tree
on WWW’s Earth-as-Universe
balanced electromagnetic
binary-bi-nomial form and function
unitarian languaged mainframing
redundant information discernment systems.

Number Four yet emerges a Positive-C
(or “e” or “P”)
evo-logical language
balancing Time’s timeless
Right-brain love
of symmetric pattern
and fractal-holonic rhythm frequencies
double-boundaried, self-justifying implicate order
of negentropic dia-syntax,
bi-cytosine as Not(Not-Uracil)
uniting +U/(+/-)C-fractal
defining SpaceTime’s 4-prime bi-equivalency,
sustaining enculturation’s cooperative economics
with co-arising
Win-Win
political=power
primal Tao (temporally bilateral and dipolar) co-relationship.

Standard
Uncategorized

Medicine Doctors

In this lifeskills class in political economics,
we look at politics as love-power
and economics as healthy-flow
of assets and resources,
investments in co-operative symbiosis
and disinvestments from unhealthy politics
relationships and transactions of hoarding
and competing and suffering monocultural
egocentric Left-brain dominance.

This lifeskills class
may also reconsider
where thanksgiving-it-forward economics
and inclusive cooperating politics
lead to healthier and wealthier outcomes
for society
and all Earth Tribe cultures.

If economic flow
and balancing function
are sacred,
then political relationships
might be divine,
designed with cooperative intention
and co-arising positive relational practice.

We might conclude this lifeskills class
for medicinal doctorates in health optimization,
with some split-brain research
concluding that Right-brained politics
can only Be present
with graced proportional presence,
a non-languaged HappySpace
of confluence with Positive Psychology.

Meanwhile, Left-brained economic function
flows from past to deduct-reduct
then language
a lexicon of future’s cooperative v. competitive frequencies,
aptic v. synaptic memory stored in strings of DNA
back through transgenerations of spacetime evolution.

This political-economic development as evolution lexicon
in comparative relationships
of relativistic, yet prime relational, transaction
between Yangish EcoNormic Left
embracing Yin-political Right,
to flow our co-emergent function
within divine eco-normic grace.

This politics of Right’s timeless-present
divine grace
informs Left’s economic discernment
of sacred cooperative space
as primal relationship of Self+Other,
as Yang-ego with YinYin-eco.

We Left paradigm our Right polycultures
to Left polyculture our Right politically power-flowing
perpectually SelfOther optimizing
polypathic
eco-teleologically balancing
sacred identity.

We will probably conclude this lifeskills class
intending to elect political leaders
to become our mentors
on how to grow healthy
co-operatively powerful
win-win relationships,
not so much a priesthood
of competitive
win-lose
economic, yet anthro-centric, gurus and thugs.

Standard
Uncategorized

Polycultural Party Invitation

First,
and hopefully last,
organizational meeting of the Polycultural Party
tonight
in our conjoined Meeting Room,
between your bicameral eyes.

If you
work or live in a cooperative,
would like to live or work in a more cooperative environment,

If you
garden or farm, or just feed, with organic preference,
would like to live in a more nutritious environment,

If you
write or dance or sing,
or some other variety of artistic expression,
or your mother calls you “artistic”
because she just doesn’t know what else to say,
or you would like to live more artistically,
gracefully,
within beauty of Self-Other creativity,

If you
are New Age spiritual
but feel old age natural,

then you are already an uncertified member
of our Polycultural Party.

Let’s continue certifying each other,
speak and listen
about how to be
and become
this Party,
more cooperatively organized,
more organic.

Note:

Your space and mine: co-operating.

Your time with mine: co-arising ec(o)-science-consciousness.

Standard