Uncategorized

Evolutionary Physics of Regenerativity

Darwin’s Theory of Evolution could be re-cast as noticing the elevation and decline of species within a polycultural ecosystem. Darwin added an uncomfortable and unresolved hypothesis of species-level evolutionary learning, a form and level of informational organization, transition, change, regeneration and decomposition through multigenerational genetics. This species-branching level of mutation lies between Buckminster Fuller’s view of Universal Intelligence and Julian Jaynes’ evolutionary theory of the human bicameral neural system philogenetically-multisystemically-polyculturally regenerating through the development of left-hemispheric linguistic and deductive dominance over our older right-hemispheric awareness. This older aptic/synaptic RNA-rooted awareness remains regeneratively confluent with DNA enculturing bionic ecological-analogical structure and binary-digital-atomically revolving time sequence; or leads to cognitive and affective dissonance, delusion, dismay, lack of mental well-being.

Fuller bring us a teleological “Plan A” Synergetic Progenitive Relationship Function, defined as (0)-Core Vector or Vortex, depending on whether our elliptical view is concave or convex, Yang or Yin functional. Fuller’s Core Vortex is Prime bi- and dia-nuclear, rooted in (0) Prime Relationship of Vertex OVER Vortex Eulerian “cross”-fractal function, a dynamic intersection of space and time. Prime Relationship is both (a) positive-synergetic creation as appositionally diastatic tensioned, intentioned, with (b) negentropy, Dark Relationship, pattern, rhythmic Implicate Order (here, perhaps intersecting with the linguistics and physics of David Bohm) forming an empirical-temporal string development theory.

Later, Gregori Perelman’s work in metric Group Theory proved that it would be impossible to disprove a (0)-soul universal theorem. If you have one elliptical form or function or frequency of energy, then you will have a second potentiality within that is holonically related to what Fuller referred to as Plan A, what Hindus call Brahman, and what mystics might call universal consciousness. The metric root and route of our coincidentally Brahmanic Budda Yang=Yin Tao Bicamerally evolving balancing brain moves into and through transmillennial, transitional, transactive revolutioning balance/harmonic speciating/branching Intelligence–a hybrid of YangForm and YinPrimeBinomialFunction.

Darwin’s problem was how any created life, especially human natural life, could originate from an omnipotently benign Progenitor and yet end up with evolution’s Manifest Destiny of thrival-of-the-fittest.  This problem of evil as might-makes-right is parallel to our physical science dilemma about the law and order of energy and mass. The Principles of Thermodynamics predict entropic monocultural outcome within any closed Universal System as an inevitable ultimate demise, lacking resource for self-regeneration, lacking even gravity, relationship, pattern, predictability, no place of any kind, only entropic chaos of nothingness. No Eulerian function. So why do we have something rather than nothing?

But, Fuller notices a primal tetrahedral-fractal dynamic and dimensional Constant predicating structure within the evolution of natural systems. This prime balanced function appears polypathically and polyculturally analogical, ecological, physiological, ethological, teleological, and just plain old-fashioned logical-rational equi-valent to prime-rational spacetime relations of 3 space-linear dimensions normatively equal 3 times 1 Time-Prime wave-linear binary-binomial dimension of electromagnetic gravity revolving thermodynamic balance.

From a “birdseye shamanic view” of Earth and Universe, this torus ribbon-revolving shape shifting, spinning-revolving, self-regenerative clockwise dynamic revolution optimizes prime-metrically as 4-equivalent dimensional spacetime, just as does fractal-organized RNA. The 4th temporal “spacetime” provides a static quartile-holonic view of time’s closure, such as winter closing the four seasons of an organic growth and harvest year, and dark midnight lunar voidingness closing the cycles of days and months, and death closing the birth-youth-adult-Elder fractal, although this remains most temporally and ecologically confluent with our other natural spacetime systems as we also recognize death as a boundary-threshold toward rebirth.

This evolution of consciousness regarding our dual manifest destiny, both living and dying, unfolds at the species level of intelligible, syntropic information, but remains more scientifically controversial at both the Universal Intelligence (“universal design” as teleological faith) and individual Ego identity level, my person-level, the sense in which I am me and you are you. The faith, or even hope, that my dying Elder-ship final stage should and could and would like to also feel and think and know and comprehend as coincident karmic dipolar integrity toward rebirth, redemption, an Id-Entity passing through the double-bind, double-negative threshold boundary, a potentially eternal spacetime Moment, Event, Being. We experience a collective cognitive and affective dissonance about this law of entropic closed outcomes, suggesting that reincarnation of Ego, Plan B, function is not rational, not polynomially conclusive.

Fuller believed that Plan B’s after life, the individual’s Ego, in Freudian terminology, is a rational hypothesis, to the extent that Plan B Bucky became a more optimally synergetic expression, articulation, of Plan A–(0) soul Universal Intelligence.

Fuller proposes synergy as appositionally balancing a Dark Matter and Prime Relationship negentropic, negative-forming, shadow function and frequency concave or vortex Black Hole, implicately (Bohm’s language, not Fuller’s) recessive energy which appears to be essentially the interior face of Perelman’s (0)-soul dia-elliptical universal balanced smooth-structured SuperEco Proof that what Freud understands as a Victorian  Judeo-Christian Divine Superego consciousness might also be more generically and culturally neutral, inclusively comprehended as a Universal Intelligence SuperEco synergy, a synonym for both polypathic love and multisystemic ecotherapy. This metaphysical-physical double-bind function is mutually gravitational balanced, harmonic gravity, or grace, or karma, or positive OVER negative bionic incarnational evolution.

Darwin’s theory of revolutionary speciation points to Thrival of the Fitting-Togetherest Cooperative as a slow-moving Manifest Dia-Destiny, including even the dark side of our negentropic trials and challenges, competitions and difficult teachers; competitive self-isolating and hoarding survivalism. Any Game Theorist, Group Dynamics Theorist or Facilitator of Communication and/or Community and/or Economic Development, any Permaculture Designer or Developer and Information Harvester, would predict becoming a more self-optimizing, regeneratively grown and sustained polyculture over monocultural, monopolistic, and monochromatic entropy-enhancing trends of decay as anything other than a TrimTab means toward a more inclusively abundant outcome.

Polyculturing Plan B, rather than monoculturing suboptimization (Plan C?), may also predict information using Bayesian QBit analysis when QBits  form as 8-Byte full-octave fractals [+/-radiant OVER (-)(-)gravitational magnetic balance], so an explicate-structured octave retains an implicate temporal-sequential fractal dynamic of positive OVER negative dia-metric development scale of functionality. QBytes, in turn, organize as +/- appositionals within a reverse-hierarchical Win-Win tree of life structure, so we have both an upright “branching tree” and a “negative” limned shadow tree root-system functionally parallel structured trend, ecological and binomial correlations passing through both positive and negative correlations at their mutually balancing systemic tipping point in any projected HereNow Moment. Bayesian QBit Win-Win trend analysis speaks our universal metric language of (0) Core Vector/Vortex, within a 4-Prime Dimensional linguistic world, and Open Systemic Exegetical Word.

Standard
Uncategorized

BiPolar Dissonance

When oppositional cognitive dissonance deflects focus,

it tends to go back to when I deflected focus from her.

She sends me passive-aggressive messages,

bread crumbs leading back in time

to where she began to feel alone,

marginalized,

siloed,

anxious.

 

If you don’t want a sopping wet tile bathroom floor

because I have thrown all my naked Barbie and Ken parts,

especially their water-filled hollow insides,

and the five saturated pools of clean washcloths

I took out of that drawer just like you said not to,

and the nice sudsy soft bar of soap,

then you might want to reconsider leaving the bathroom

during my bath.

You might want to think of telling a story

or imagining with my behavioral lectures

I so mercilessly inflict

on the shattered heads of my daughters,

oops,

I mean dolls.

 

Perhaps oppositional cognitive dissonance

is what Republicans have about Democrats.

 

If you folks would be so kind as to return to cooperative civic and civil discussion,

about our intrinsic dignity,

immaculate integrity as a permacultured orthodox tradition,

intrinsic to optimize sustainable and resilient health

for All Americans,

including those who happen to have become embarrassed

by their wealth of health and extravagant disregard

for uncommodified values,

like the synergy of all natural systems,

of religious cultures

delivering a united and interdependent positive teleology

that we all created this rapacious, extractive mess together.

 

So, please stop leaving the bathroom

every time we complain about your shitty attitudes

about wealthy compost and sustainable,

resilient,

optimized economic growth.

Then complain when we go right on doing

what we intended to do

while we were throwing water

on your slippery-floor economics

of radical,

reverse-hierarchical interdependence and mutual subsidiarity.

 

And,

our Democratic family value parents

hear their oppositionally disordered Republicans

as if they were of some dysfunctionally alien species

devoid of deductive rational accessibility,

of even one of four corners of truth,

and  without capacity to empathize with their well-mentored praxis,

of continually forgetting you could not climb a higher priority

right now

than telling your oppositional daughter Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax, 

interpreting each voice as your own Lorax,

wondering why you continue competing

to reach a Win-Win Cooperative Game,

and political

and economic

and ecological

and cultural finish line,

alone in your Permaculture Designed polycultural Loraxed paradise.

When you think about it,

you can see that your competitive political

and economic assumptions are not ecologically,

or even permaculturally,

sound, rational, integrated,

much less synergetic or holonically comprehensive.

You can’t win a P=NP,

4-fractal/spiral (0)-sum

cooperative economic logistical plan

until everyone else has the freedom

and integrity

and ecotherapeutic orthopraxis comprehension,

intention,

to win-win with you, coincidentally.

 

With this perhaps un-Christian,

and vaguely irreligious perspective

that Democratic political culture

is closer to (0) sum Core Value Balanced Heaven

rationality than appears to be the case

for our benighted Republican

and wealthy fat-cat residents of Earth,

we have turned rather too far

our spinning cultural revolution pendulum

away from the racist sin of polycultural difference,

poverty and the commodification of human lives,

and the commodification of other species,

and the commodification of Earth’s fire, water,

soil and sky,

Her capacity to regenerate fertile seeds,

turning away from sin as insanity,

disability,

to now prophecy the sins of wealth,

and power,

and competing, dissonant tipping points

of monocutural,

monochromatic,

monopolistic competing economic uncertainty

and ecological dysfunction for all nations,

including its more humane DNA-informed

bicameral information processor branch of our EcoTribe,

RNA-inscribed,

transliterate,

multisystemic and polycultural Climax Community,

diastatically

interdependently

coincidentally straining and stressing to comprehend

Polynomial SpaceTime = Not-Polynomial Open Systemic Binomial Prime Relationship Temporal “Now”

as Yang-convex/positive = Yin-concave/negative,

as +1.00% QBit = +/-(0)% Soul Core-emergent universal Vertex/Dark Recessional Vortex (Perelman, 1993)

 

So, yes, maybe somewhat closer,

but closer doesn’t count

when playing Win-Win economic logos.

Horseshoes don’t fit elephants.

 

 

 

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

Dr. Econormic’s Global Regenerative Governance Lecture

“The prime ethical conjecture, shared by all certifiable Permacultured (PC) Designers, is a deeply inclusive evolution of proto-history’s Golden Rule. I have written it out for you in full throttle.”

On the whiteboard he had written:

Within each moment

each day

each life

each thought

each word

each deed,

do with others,

including all species,

whether currently a living system,

or distant elder,

or yet to become,

as we most mindfully

compassionately

integrally

gratefully

optimally

abundantly

resiliently

robustly

sustainably

enthymematically

vibrantly hope for ourselves

and our future generations.

 

“As you may recall from your time with the Information Systems Design Department, if NP = P, then (-0) = (+1) in any information, communication or other binomial metric system.

The (0)-Core Prime Root Principle of PC Design is the Law of Positive-Balanced Thermodynamics: Greatest, most inclusive of diversity, global outcome (+1.00% e-function) is reversely appositional to least cost, dissonance, loss, dismay, climatic variance, distortion, destruction, death, and even the evaporation of wealth deposits (-0.00% e-formation).”

At this point I am feeling a bit more than my fair share of dismay.

“In the physical universe, Greatest Confluent Effect OVER Least Cognitive Dissonance implies, as suggested by David Bohm, that (-e)-formation is not Dark Matter so much as Dark Ex-Formed chaotic relationships in a 4-Based dimensional system–3 spatial, and 1 temporal.”

OK, so now we have veered off into quantum physics and the strange universes of holonic Group Theory, maybe?

“In the metaphysical universe, +function = YangEnergy and -exformation = Yin/ErgodionicGravity. So, the Prime Law of PC Design is also the Prime Law of Thermodynamic Balance. I’ve written it out for you, for those who like math.”

+e-functional Polynomial (P) = -e-reverse-formative Binomial N(NP), so

+P = (-)(-)P, implied Binomial Double-Bind Prime Temporal Relationship, and

(+P * -P) = +e-squared form/function = 1 Positive QBit

“PC Design strategies are pentanomic:

1. Care for Id-Self as an abundantly graced fractal of SuperEco, or Universal Intelligence (B. Fuller)

2. Care for Other as our synergetic EcoTribe

3. Care for Earth as our shared EcoTherapeutic paradise

4. Redistribute polycultural values, resources, nutrients, information universally and cooperatively as surplus monocultural-trending development emerges

5.Prime TippingPoint Principle of Regenerative Whole System Economic Redemption: Greatest Effect/Least Cost–including dissonance, loss, violence, competition, and decay

 

You may note that this economic view of eco-valent optimization strategies includes both the PC (0)-Core ethical implication (2), an embellished Golden Rule, and the Binary-Prime, or TrimTab, Principle of Systemic Regeneration (5). Oppositional corollaries are implied, for the first four, and actually included in the fifth PC strategy; basically avoid sociopathological assumptions of scarcity and competition for positive values. So, these could be expanded as 10 PC strategies.  For example, the 3rd strategy implies do not rape Earth as a competitively valued commodity for anthropocentric ownership, or enslavement.

Strategies 4 and 5 are reverse corollaries or appositional, if you will; Janus faces of each other. If we optimally and inclusively pursue the TrimTab Principle, then positive/negative value imbalances will self-minimize. But, when they do, they trigger the local CQI evolutionary filter, regenerating a local TrimTab (special case) solution. The TrimTab Principle is bicameral Yang proactive and Yin preventive design perspective. The 4th strategy is regenerative Yin socioeconomic therapeutic response to negative anomalous competitive excess trends in economic, value-transfer, ecosystems.

This is a regenerative pentanomic system because it includes the growth cycle from

seed, yields

species generation, yields

global polyculture, yields

Universal Intelligent Design, and

the reverse corollary, remedial therapy, to apply when the polycultural growth cycle produces anomalous monocultural wealth deposits and growth-yield deficits. These deposits may be viewed as positive, within the anomalous monoculture, but negative throughout the more inclusive polycultural (0) Core Prime Root Relationship systemic filter of eternally regenerative discernment, development and design.

(0) Core Prime Root Relationship is a binary metric in-forming system, speaking a permacultural language of Tao as regenerative process, very old indeed, but reincarnated recently as “Zeroism”: The Universe, and all systems, emerge not from an atomic nuclear noun, but from a mutually self-perpetuating synergetic verb relationship between Yang-(+e) and Yin-(-e) [Dark Energy]. This expresses a positively-dominant slow-constant dynamically re-fusive harmonious relationship; a reverse flow evolutionary trajectory away from dark entropic chaos, dismay, and hell, I suppose.”

“Any questions?”

The room was silent, so this was my opportunity: “Well, I recently took a look at the Rick Raddatz Pentanomic Theory of Government. He seems to define social equity as maximizing the utility of resources; that’s what a well-functioning, just economic system will, or could, at least eventually, achieve.”

Without missing a beat, Norton responds, “Yes, true enough, but the ethical problem with utilitarian economics has always been that it leaves open the possibility of declaring justice achieved without inclusively responsive peace. Our positive teleological hope for value system economies is not just for the majority to survive, to achieve equitable distribution of scarce resources, but for fulfilling sufficiency-participation in global value itself. Nothing less will achieve peace at a global scale.

We hope for vibrant internal and external ecologies. Yes, vibrant ecologies must include equitable resource transfer wisdom. But, what about developing synergetic relationships between values, resources, nutrients, information and communication systems, learning, creative expression, well-being, health? Ecological justice hopes for regenerative, vibrantly dense, rich, resonant, resilient, synergetic integrity, opulent paradigmatic optimization; a CQI standard for justice, yes, but also active peace and joy and beauty and goodness, worth, inclusive merit and well-being. Grace ecologies include fair and sustainable resource economies internal to each identity and external within SuperEco Information, now, and for future generations, inclusive of all species.”

Now, he was getting less academic, more passionate.

“Economic justice truncated from a graced ecology of peace and redemptive mercy for emergent monocultural anomalies holds no positive teleological function for a cooperative learning and mutually-mentoring culture over a competitive culture.  A merely mechanical metaphor does not distinguish between relationships of win-win holistic intent, and relationships consistent with win-lose strategies; although they can work for distinguishing between win-lose and lose-lose strategies.  This is not enough for optimizing regenerative ecosystems.

Anyone who studies natural ecosystems recognizes that when a system becomes a competitive environment of scarcity its flow and frequency functions and trends are pathological. Sociotherapy is the reverse trend and energy–a cooperative economy of synergetic faith in mutually-mentoring abundance, evolving rich and deeply vibrant polycultures.

Avoid mechanical metaphors; natural system analogies offer far more realistically predictive depth and texture, and they can distinguish between global win-win cooperation and more nationalistic win-lose myopic design elements.”

After a reflective pause, “A  natural system filtering analogy that comes to mind is water the flowers of cooperative intent, not the weeds of competitive practice.

Any other questions?”

Standard
Uncategorized

The Global Cooperative Development Network: CQI PermaCulture Design Team Project

Day (0)

 

I woke up this morning remembering my Time Traveling Math Historian dream, wondering, actually kind of obsessed about it, like a schizophrenic trying to see through his meds.

 

But, Ivy had a poopy diaper, and so did Daquan, and Sunday morning rudely returned to Business As Usual.  Which is OK, I think.  I rather like Business As Usual at home.  It helps when we are all here, rather than just some of us.  It helps even more when all of us work together, rather than choosing not to invest in each other, at the time, and in the ways, and amounts of time, that I prefer.  Although, of course, I have never bothered to tell any of them what those ways and means might be.  Anyway, Business As Usual.

 

Today I have to design a PermaCulture Development class for the global Cooperative Economy Network, started by a consortium of social investors, public facilitators and community organizers, new economists, permaculture and ecology-missioned groups, intentional communities, including research cooperatives and funders, some public sector, most of the grant-making entities. In a sense I guess each of these subgroups is an intentional community, with its own language and justice issues, priorities, concerns, specific missions and vocations on behalf of our planet. Yet it feels like they share a common value and active disvalue infrastructure. I can see why this social constellation wants to look clear-eyed at their shared mission: to optimize Continuous Quality Improvement, natural growth, re-establish a global permacultured economy and ecology, inclusive of all species, with this Transition Generation, and the 7 generations to follow.

 

So that’s why I told them I would write up a cooperative contract proposal with them (not for them) and that proposal begins with asking each adult participating in this PermaCulture System Design training to bring one person under the age of 25 with them, if at all possible one of their own children, or a younger relative, down to the age of 12. These are the people that we all need to listen to about how to design their PermaCulture Planet.  In Group Development Theory they act as a Lie Group, but that is certainly not appropriate for this event.  I don’t know.  For now, let’s just go with the “Shaman Team” and the “Observing Team.”

 

OK, so let’s see. 

 

 NSF, Division of Social and Economic Sciences: Science of Organizations

 

Organizations — private and public, established and entrepreneurial, designed and emergent, formal and informal, profit and nonprofit — are critical to the well-being of nations and their citizens. They are of crucial importance for producing goods and services, creating value, providing jobs, and achieving social goals. So, how do we improve the design and emergence, development and deployment, and management and ultimate effectiveness of organizations of all kinds?

 

The Cooperative Economy Network (CEN) is committed to our fundamental understanding of how cooperative systems develop, form and operate. The PermaCulture Design Project will develop and refine Regenerative System Development Theory, and  develop new measures and standards for Continuous Quality Improvement of community and global development projects. Educational, Communication, and Information Systems implications may be of value to the business practitioner, policy-maker, educator, parent, and research communities.

 

The PermaCulture Design Project will illuminate aspects of organizations as organic systems of coordinated diversity, self-management, and inclusive governance.

 

Germane theoretical paradigms include (but are not limited to) organizational theory, behavior, sociology and economics, business policy and strategy, communication sciences, entrepreneurship, human resource management, information sciences, geometrics and Group Theory, Synergetics (B. Fuller), managerial and organizational cognition, operations management, public administration, social and industrial psychology, and technology and innovation management.

Phenomena studied will include (but are not limited to) value and power structures, iteration frequencies, choice-making effectiveness, competitiveness, innovation, communication  and Binary Information System dynamics, change and evolution.

Levels of analysis will include organizational, cross-organizational cooperative relationships, and global implications, and will include individual and team value metrics.

Research methods  include archival analyses, surveys, simulation, comparative case studies, and network analyses.

 

Intellectual merit: The Cooperative Economy Network’s final report will further articulate a Cooperative-Appositional System Theory of Evolution.

 

This Cooperative Development Research Project has the potential to provide globally inclusive societal benefits, meeting sustainable value optimization standards for a socially, culturally, and ecologically balanced cooperative economy.

 

First Day:

 

Facilitator:

 

Welcome, and thank you for saying yes to our invitation to spend some time listening and speaking with each other. Those around the walls are our Observer Team. They are also your parents, aunts, uncles, grandparents, or maybe even that crazy adult who asked you to do this with them, as a partnership. You around this inner circle are members of a Transition Generation, ages 12 to 24.

 

Here is what David Orr predicted for your future:  “The generation now being educated will have to do what we, the present generation, [this was published in 1997, so you would be 22 now if you had been in kindergarten at age 5 in 1997] have been unable or unwilling to do: stabilize a world population that is growing at the rate of a quarter of a million each day, stabilize and then reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, which threatens to change the climate—perhaps disastrously; protect biological diversity, now declining at an estimated rate of one hundred to two hundred species per day, reverse the destruction of rain-forests (both tropical and temperate), now being lost at the rate of one hundred and sixteen square miles or more each day; and conserve soils; now being eroded at the rate of sixty-five million tons per day.” You must “learn how to use energy and materials with great efficiency.” You “must learn how to utilize solar energy in all its forms.” You “must rebuild the economy in order to eliminate waste and pollution.” You “must learn how to manage renewable resources for the long term.” You “must begin the great work of repairing, as much as possible, the damage done to the earth in the past two hundred years of industrialization. And, you must do all of this while addressing worsening social and racial inequities. No generation has ever faced a more daunting agenda.” (Hannum, ed. Environmental Literacy: Education as if the Earth Mattered)

 

I believe the life trajectory situation of your children and their children has reached a transition era of crisis. Those of us in this room are hear to listen to what your experience has been like so far, and what you think you might like to do as a Transition Generation before your kids arrive (if kids are in your future) and maybe even with your kids as you imagine your adult futures.

 

We begin today with three fundamental questions for each of you.  In the first round we will ask these questions in reference to what happens in this room, with and to these people.  Then we will talk about the same three questions in reference to what happens outside this room, with everybody else.

 

1.  What interests you most? What is the creative or learning scenario that feels most compelling to you? You would do more of what if you could?  If you had the resources, time, money, property, health, education? What seems most compelling to you right now, in this situation, that we might even be able to do together here?

 

[High faith power indicator.]

 

2.  What makes you angry, gets you really riled up? What is the specific scenario that is most likely to get you to erupt, that could conceivably happen to one or more people in this room, yourself included? What will really tick you off if somebody does it, or doesn’t do it, today?

 

[High hope for justice, equity, mutual respect.]

 

3. What makes you sad.  What is the scenario in which you are most likely to imagine yourself as lonely, isolated, incapacitated, depressed that could happen to you today?  What would really shut you down and out, and make it impossible for you to care to participate any further? Imagine yourself really sad and hopelessly bored by mid-afternoon today, what happened to get you into that mental space?

 

[High enthymematic reverse-resolution.  Compare to “1” above.]

Standard