Polling station with voting signs and American flags beside a church
Uncategorized

Mid-Term Discerning Christians

Rev. Gerald Dillenbeck

As we head into a Mid-Term election, it may be confusing to sort out what a faithful, responsible, and gospel-informed Christian should do about voting. Last week I noted warnings against voting for “Marxist Democratic” candidates, implying they are all alike, ungodly communists.

You may peruse the words and actions of Jesus Christ captured in the Gospels, looking for answers to what the informed Body of Christ should do in our situation today. Jesus said, to the great disappointment of the Zealots, that He had come as Prince of Peace, which excludes war- and fear-mongering, threatening, gratuitous violence. Then there are His Beatitudes. “Blessed are the peace-makers, for they shall inherit the Earth.”

Jesus also said that whatever we do to the “anawim,” the lowest caste of people, without personal rights and property, immigrants, prisoners, women, children, is what we do to Him, the Body of Christ. So, because “God is love,” to treat Christ’s global Body correctly, drawn toward one shared communion table, we always side with love, and with a healthy democracy. This is also the Preamble’s stated purpose for establishing the U.S. Constitution, to “form a more perfect union.” Happily, at least here, both church and state agree in the United States.

As far as I know, we have only had one President who, in his Inaugural Address, explicitly said he would exercise a preferential option for those who support him (not for the poor, the anawim) AND would pursue revenge against those who do not.

As far as I know, it has been only Republican Senators and Representatives who have helped President Trump carry out his threat against a healthy democracy, against a more perfect union, against domestic peace, inflaming partisan polarization with fully culpable intent.

While it is true that Karl Marx favored a robust democracy as contrasted to an upper v lower caste divide between rich and anawim, it is also true that Jesus Christ did, and does, hold to this same caste-transformative agenda. This is the gospel-inspired vocation of all those who are disciples of His teachings, and example.

Where Marx and Jesus differ is about belief in the power of love to achieve personal and global peace among all sentient beings, not just land-owning prosperous heterosexual white men, with big guns and bountiful ammunition. Peace-making by non-violent compassion and means moves the entire international Body of Christ toward a healthy polycultural communion. This is Christ’s Way, not Marx’s fear-mongering armed vengeance.

If your pastoral leadership is preaching and teaching something different than Jesus’ gospel of healthy democratic peace, you might want to revisit Jesus’ warnings about wolves in sheep’s clothing, and those who bully, snub, or just ignore, the peacemakers. It is those who do not take the side of unconditionally inclusive love to whom the Great Divine says, “I never knew you.”

My theological advice? Become actively curious about your Congressional candidates. How do they personally prioritize the fruits of the Spirit, including love, joy, and peace. How do they avoid supporting hate, anger, and systemic trauma?

Standard
Uncategorized

Zero

Word Problem:
What is the political
and economic
and moral difference
between a -1 communist concentration camp
and a +1 capitalist detention camp?

Hint:
Probably the same Christian taxpayer difference
between
-0 (emptiness):

SUBTRACT empowering hope
for a healthy democracy,
Red and Yellow
Black and White
they are precious
in His sight

and
+0 (fullness):

ADD disempowering despair
of stealthy stupid kleptocracy,
pitching Red against Yellow
Black against White
liberal SkyBlue dreams
against conservational EarthGreen realities

Economically unsafe
and politically unhealthy

MotherEarth
laid inhumane waste,
dark stark global disrepair.

Capitalist detention camp distinctions
without communist concentration camp differences

DeGenerative World Problem UnSolution:
a +1 v -1 Total-itarian risk.

ReGenerative Word Problem ReSolution:
a Win/Win +0 and -0 CoBinary
Making Earth Great Again
healthy democratic CoIntelligent
ecological-economic opportunity.

Standard
Uncategorized

A Healthier Patriotism

My own patriotic U.S. extended family,
historically,
and currently
remains StraightWhiteMale privileged
in our collective memories,
if not imaginations,
of spiritual communion
with all the more privileged saints
present,
past,
and future

But, we have also suffered
from rather too much faith in capitalism,
which, like democracy,
is frequently faulted as miserable,
but also lauded as better
than all the socialistic
communistic
devilistic
totalitarian
fascist
foreign
threatening
terrifying
anger-inducing alternatives.

Capitalism of our encultured
multigenerational minds
with left-hemisphere dominant brains
favoring natural secularized competitions
between saints and sinners
of diversely threatening monocultural privilege,
persuasions fundamentally supremacist
for democracy in theory
so long as not in perceived conflict
with self-serving capitalism in daily personal practice,
natural and spiritual,
secular and sacred,
ecological and theological.

We are egocentric
sometimes narcissistic
always bootstrap individualistic
evangelical redemption ecopoliticals
but focused on BadNews
of our need to invest in violent self-defense
against Marxist communism out there
in Hell

Not to be confused with commitment to GoodNews
of sacred divine communion
within our privileged StraightWhiteMale places
of apartheid worship
in awe and wonder
dogmatically committed to our StraightWhiteMale God

Made military-industrialized
in our best capitalistic,
not really quite so democratic paternalistic
image of left-hemisphere
StraightWhiteMale rightfully empowered
historical/cultural dominance.

So, there we have it,
this chaotic bilateral dissonance
between our powers of political democratic enlightenment
through whole open-systemic dialogue,
and our confusion about economic uncooperative self-empowerment
at the necessary (either/or thinking) cost of Other disempowerment,
gone sadly win/lose awry
through endless polarizing debate assumptions

That if someone wins,
then all others playing our eco-political game
must lose,
which sounds very much like
survival of the fittest
rightest
left-brain dominant species
OVER AGAINST
Earth’s whole open system
green/blue
ecological/theological success.

Like our dominant left-hemisphere academic theory
of secularized win/lose evolution
is more anthropocentrically capital-headed
and self-righteously defensively effective
than Earth’s sacred WINblue/WINgreen
ego/eco-politics
of polypathic political dialogue
empowering through GoldenRule democratic resilience,

And right hemisphere
polyphonic economic enlightenment
co-invested through Golden Octave Ratios
in interdependent multicultural dialogue,

Holonic nonzero sum,
polynomially left GroupTheory
and polyvagally bicameral right/left Win/Win GameExperience

My extended global
multicultural family
history and future
with more resonant
healthier cooperative democracy
embedded in Earth’s ecosystemic wealth,

Co-invested across multi-generations
of MotherEarth’s wise-dialogue
win/win eco-political
eco-feminist regenerators

Not of colonizing political
and anthropocentric economic privilege
but of democratically co-invested integrity
in sacred green/blue communion.

Standard
Uncategorized

Not Your Negro

Last night I was mesmerized
by James Baldwin
in a documentary
“I Am Not Your Negro”
in which Baldwin reflects on
Medger, Malcolm, and Martin
who were shot in that order
within six years of each other,
all under age forty,
by guns newer nationalistic leaders of the NRA
would most likely celebrate
for sale and use to hate,
retaliate
for sins of last-class birth.

One picture stands out
among several shocking views.
A Birmingham Alabama protest placard
stating
INTEGRATED SCHOOLS
AND MARRIAGE
IS COMMUNISM.

Both Marx and Engels
would have been surprised to read this,
but perhaps such an obvious display of ignorance
merits no alternative definition,
or even grammar,
having more to do with economics
than monoculturing misuse of supremacist politics.

So allow me
this one much belated try.

Communism is an evolutionary theory
of economic development
assuming competition between those who own
and those who do not
will inevitably lead
to falling aristocracies of hoarded wealth,
regardless of race, color, creed,
gender,
gender preference,
religion,
language,
whether you vote blue,
or red,
or green,
much more black and white not together.

Communitarianism
is a cooperative evolutionary experience
in which co-investment between and among co-owners
leads to optimal quality improvement
of healthy wealth outcomes,
regardless of race,
gender,
creolizing mutually enculturing
as above.

Democratic whole Earth system healthy politics,
both sacred and secular varieties,
support communitarian wealthy co-investing economics,
and vice versa.

But,
neither competitive totalitarian communism
nor cooperative subsidiary ownership
and responsibility
and authority of communitarians
is defined by racial integration,
or libertarianism either, for that possibly unrelated matter,
although these might agree
that continuing freedoms for segregation
and its fossilizing maintenance
prolongs and builds higher walls
between those who have most,
those who have nothing,
and those who worry about joining the latter
by waving placard ignorance
for the former,
too busy hoarding their money
within gated communities
to actually show up,
while quietly financing
our most avid absence of integrity supporters.

Enforcing segregation of races
works about as well as
forced separation of food-chain species,
where eventually everybody starves separately
rather than feeding off
and on
each other
together,
more like an actually healthy community.

Standard