Tag Archives: nondualism

Triangular diagram showing energy flow from plants to herbivores to predators with nutrient cycling by decomposers
Uncategorized

After School Jam Session

How was school today?

Fine.

Did you learn anything important?

Maybe. I’m not sure yet.

Really? What are you considering?

We talked about Howard Odum’s natural trinity
of altruism.

Maybe I skipped that day
way back in premillennial times
before Permaculture Design had taken over deep learning development.
Who is Howard Odum
and how does his natural trinity
diverge from my traditional Holy Trinity?
Or, maybe it doesn’t.

Howard Odum was an early systems theorist
who studied ecosystemic trends
of nutrition building and disintegrating
of sustainable polycultural balance
and runwaway monocultural disasters
like climate and culture and communication
anti-nutritional pathologies.

Did you just say
climate change derives from monocultural overshoot,
an anthropocentric weed patch
taking over our communal garden,
also known as organic Earth?

I guess,
but in this case the weed patch
is over-commodified
LeftBrain dominant
anthropoids.
Odum’s natural trinity of altruism
is about climates of interdependent health,
and not for developing monocultural monopolies
like monotheistic anthropocentrism.

I’m sure I missed this class,
if they even had it back in my Baby Boomer day.

You probably just got the Holy Trinity part,
when you studied metaphysics.
I don’t think they were teaching organic physical theory
when you took MultiCultural Civics Organization classes;
although Howard was published well before your high school years.

It probably took a while for educators
to sort out the health and wealth significance
of ecosystemic balance,
rather than merely lecturing against issues
of unsustainable imbalances
hoping for healthy democracy optimizing,
polyculturing,
and, thereby, self+other polyamorous systems
as win+win wellness,
and not so much win v lose sickness.

Anyway, so is there a summary version of this natural trinity
that you might share?

Well, yes, I suppose the basic idea is as simple
as any convex and therefore also concave co-binary triangle.

I’m already lost.
No recall of convex and concave
in my Holy Trinity.

Oh, right…
you missed postmillennial Bucky Fuller metrics too.
Let’s see…
OK, Odum’s natural trinity
is a dynamic model for balancing organic energy investments,
but at two levels.

The individual anthropocentric biosystem.
And, the collective EarthMother pro-life support system,
conceived as a nondualistic
ongoing space/time
body/mind ecosystem
sharing Earth together
as one organic/sacred
pleasure/compassion-seeking Body.

At both of these levels,
individual and higher-order interdependent civil,
about a third of energy invested into the system
is required for healthy metabolic regeneration
of each and every organic ego-system.

Another consumed third of energy
feeds back to (concavely) sustain mutually subsidiary bioregions,
providers of interdependent fuel and energy and relationship.

The last captured third of energy
produces re-investments outward
to what Odum calls
“higher-order [convex] system controllers.”

Do you have an example?
What might be one of my potential investments
in a higher-order nurture/nutrition system?

Well,
in class
the hierarchical trinity we used
was grass in relationship with rabbits
in relationship with a predator,
like a fox,
for example.

So the rabbit’s energy waste fuels the grass,
and the more vulnerable rabbits feed the foxes.

Yes, especially the young and lame.
The ones who see and sniff and move less well.

I don’t see how that works out so well as a trinitarian third.
If you are young or lame or blind, especially.
But how does Odum approximate this one-third math
at the individual creature level?

That’s what we’re talking about in class.
I would imagine
if you view successfully hunted and devoured
from a predator’s perspective
you might feel the prey had made nearly a 100% re-investment,
perhaps omitting the larger bones,
in your higher-caste controlling species.
Perhaps a hungry pride of lions.

This natural trinity of altruism
seems to suffer in the end
from gluttonous taking without needing
and less compassionate giving without needing to be asked,
which is what I thought altruism was more about.

I suppose Odum was imagining a healthy polyculturing life-support system
as a resonantly deep-concave and wide-convex whole organic system,
in which about one third of ego-support generation,
as seen from a monotheistic perspective,
redeems the other two-thirds sacrifice
by feeding the metabolic thrival needs
of higher-order predators,
controlling risks of overpopulation,
leading to monocultural climates and communications
of descending, and increasingly rabid,
monopolistic pathology.

You mean like mother pigs eating their young
to better feed those remaining in her litter?

OK, if that actually happens
I’m not sure I wanted to know about it.
Also, if that happens,
then we are talking about an out of balance survival system
between older and younger generations within the same species.

Perhaps Odum was speaking of some Gaia Hypothesis balance
of energy and communication transfers.
Really big picture.
Global.
Polypathic energy exchanges.

And maybe higher order systems
are not limited to upper-caste predators.
Perhaps a higher order ecosystem
might nurture bioregional victims
of Earth’s imbalance,
especially our young and wounded
unenlightened and disempowered
by sensory blindness
and malnourished ego-identity expansion,
continuation

Until we each rediscover
that pain and loss and death
could be revisited
reconceived
reconnected
re-ligioned
as equal to two-thirds of compassionate life
and polyculturing gain
through monoculturing absence,
concave emptiness,
loss of egocentric Win v Lose investment,
divestment of upper-caste monotheistic self
as re-investment in Whole PolyCultural System
compassionate communion balance.

So, that would be the inter-religious connection, then,
between Odum’s natural trinity of altruism
and Christianity’s Holy Trinity
of and for EarthMother’s polytheistic
polyamorous altruism.

Where is Holonic Spirit
in this nondualistic trinity
of convex-eco control
with concave-ego nurturance
co-binary producing resilient healthy wealth
of ego/eco-systemic Whole Organic Earth?

That would be the middle ego/eco
co-passionate/pleasure
mind/body balance,
growing out to extend family identity
to include gratitude for annoying cousins
unenlightened politicians
disempowering judges
extending on through our individual biosystemic losses
pains
aches
depressions
systemic traumas
dispassionate/displeasing challenges
to personal higher order thrival.

So, with all that said,
do you both think and feel
that you learned anything enlightening
and empowering at school today?

As I said, maybe.
I’m not sure yet.

Standard
Metallic spirals transitioning into glowing golden waves against a starry background
Uncategorized

Compassionate Capital

The opposite of heat is cold
but what lies in-between?

The opposite of friction is fusion
and Earth’s living systems evolve in-between.

The opposite of Capital Empire Expansion,
with military industrialized full-divestment strength,
is Earth ComPassionate Communication,
flowing fusion of fertile fulfillments.

In-between anthropocentric monopoly competitions
and eco-centered polycultural cooperation,
where either Win or Lose capital deduction
deviates from the thriving norm
of bilateral both Win and NotLose
compassionate seductions

Empowering love
informs enlightened economic healthcare
optimally retained
with actively pleasing political passion,
interdependent polyamorous governance

Polypathic LeftCrown and RightRoot
bicamerally fusing interior peace
transforming exterior EarthJustice
politically cooperative networks.

The opposite of bear
is bull
What flows heart-felt fusion
fertilely fulfilling
in-between
sustains compassionately communing
Crown and Root communication.

Standard
Glowing blue and gold interwoven strands of light against a dark cosmic background
Uncategorized

Integrity’s Boundaries

What if we were lusty song,
sacred litany?

What if…
What if we were sensual dance,
grace filled choreography?

What if we were organic energy?
Naked branched and rooted trees
joining navels
from native mother wombs
to nurture Mother seeds
down through speciating generations
up for regeneration.

What if we became trusted time
for reorganizing space?
Irreplaceable humored climates
recreating sacredly organic humidity.

I am not your sad place
and not gladly mine
with responsibility to displace
or authority to replace.
I am not my fading face.

We are designed to fall apart,
even with unlikely careful wear.
So what is this time
of my planned obsolescence?

No refuge from surrender
to daily worn-out deaths.
Not yet refused to rise this day
ready for each dusk
without anticipation
for love or lust
rain or dust
win or bust.
It’s just us
wearing down the best we can.

What if…
What if we were each a song
resonating one pure measure
of integrity’s longest line dance?

What if we were timeless energy
resonating freestyle
mind embodiedness?

Standard
Blue brain and green leaf glowing and merging with light connections
Uncategorized

Same Old Differences

Why is it that philosophers and scientists,
politicians and even theologians
expect more bountiful outcomes
from relentlessly segregating
and disparately defining
what their passions
and great pleasures
are not?

Positive definitions
lie within
these negative defensive boundaries
of what it,
whatever “it” may be,
is not.

Religion is not science
and philosophy disregards the merely scientific
and scientific religions are an abomination
(too totalitarian, you see)
and history is none of the above,
yet speaks all of the above
about all of those below,
especially if they presented themselves
as unmitigatedly straight
purely white
exceptional men.

These traditions born of human experience
grow paradigmatic double-binding walls
to define what’s healthy in
by what’s best out.

Yet, ecology of natural/spiritual
both physical
and metaphysical
nondualistic systems
respects no oppositional boundaries
and all appositional contrasts

Where history/herstory is Earth’s organic story
unfolding co-passionate reunion,
leftbrain scientifically formed
and rightbrain religiously flowing

Remembering
reincarnating
reweaving
reconnecting
re-ligioning
nondual co-arising con-science
ecology of karmic grace
through Gaia’s climate healthy wealth

Compromised by encroaching eco-political
anthropological
and too-industrial
climate pathologies
of inhumane competing hubris.

Western religious traditions
may differ from Eastern
through telling an historically embedded tale
of universal organic empowerment
rather than timeless nondual metaphysics
of becoming sacredly enlightened
EarthTribe unitarians

Yet both are within one ecological umbrella
of passionate mind
and pleasured body
contenting and co-arising regenerativity

Climate health reversing decompositional degenerativity
as further Too AnthropoCentric Busyness
competitively hunting and devouring
far more than gathering and absorbing

Cooperative counter-balancing
draws LeftBrain scientific thought
and RightBrain religious feeling
boundaries
around what God/dess Earth
has brought nutritionally
married together.

Scientific philosophers,
and sometimes even religious theologians,
find healthier and more regenerative
passionate policies
and pleasing procedures
for refining how our ecological loves
remain great transitionally storied
indigenously cooperative pursuits
of comprehensive integrity.

Standard
Uncategorized

Bucky Fuller and Julian Jaynes

Buckminster Fuller and Julian Jaynes
recently reviewed their cultural and scientific influence
on health and well-being,
economically ecological outcomes,
during our current NonDual Transitional Era.

Bucky:
I wish I had spent more time speaking as a Unitarian Positive Teleologist.
Perhaps that would have taken care of my diminished trends in cultural awareness
of what,
in retrospect,
was exhaustively published
but not really read or fully contemplated,
now undervalued and ignorantly ignored:

  1. “Synergy,”
    everything I ever published about the topic of “synergy,”
    geometrically and spiritually defining integrity,
    in Western cultures,
    sacredly and organically refining compassion,
    in nondualistic Eastern traditions.
  2. The encoded regenerative fractal structure of Physical Universal Intelligence
    follows DNA/RNA thermodynamic,
    electromagnetic,
    permacultural,
    economic,
    psychological and sociological and political,
    and ecological Prime Yang/Yin Relationship balance;

and evolutionary dynamics are fractal-dipolar revolving
harmonic Convex-Exterior-Yang OVER Concave-Interior-Yin
(0)-Core Vector Rooted octaves
with branching tree structures

Running into Lin Yutang and Taoism before I published,
I could have connected Yang metaphysical perspectives
with Convex-Exterior physical principles,
and Yin metaphysics with Concave-Interior physical feelings
of bicameral neurosystemic flow
double-binding both LeftYang
andRightYin
dipolar nondual consciousness.

Julian:
Yes,
I can see that same sense of ethological
and ecological
and teleological dynamic
emergent awareness embracing LeftBrain’s evolution
speaking out from multigenerational RNA
regenerative intelligence
of RightBrain affective memory.

My neural theory of nonverbal nondualistic RghtBrain
underlying newer verbal LeftBrain information processing,
anthropological learning development,
seems to support your equivalency
between ethotic “synergy”
and subconscious erotic polyamorous integrity

And positive neuropsychological eco-politics
rooted in co-empathic bicameral trust

As well as Gregori Perelman’s fractal prime work,
and William Thurston’s dialectical too,
in fractal-prime Group Theory,
and I wonder if there isn’t something in there that pertains to the ecologistics
and statistical/strategic win/win predictions
of CoBinary Game Theory

Using reverse-hierarchy Win+Win assumptions.
You know,
so no one id-entity can optimally win
until the severed links in our great chain of interdependence
achieves equivalent body/mind
pleasure/passion
eros/ethos
felt/thought polyamorous values?

Bucky:
Absolutely.
Synergy and love retain universal multicultural integrity,
polycultural resilience,
harmony between Left-languaged deductive memory
and Right-nonverbal inductively felt codex
of positive v. negative feeling
experiential, yet multigenerational, awareness,
like what Polanyi calls “Personal Knowledge.”

Julian:
So synergy and love and confluence
are neurologically acclimated to messages
that do not cause cognitive dissonance,
disease,
dismay,
lack of equivalent appositional balance
and dipolar rhapsody.

Compassionate bicameral mindfulness
restores ego/eco-comprehensive connection
optimized through balancing Left-brained Yang
and Right-brained Yin
ego/eco functions.

Bucky:
Yes, I wish the Clay Math Challenge folks could have recognized
and celebrated
that Synergetics is really all about Polynomial v. Not-Polynomial information
lack of bicameral integrity v. not not binomial problem
of nondualistic ambiguity

Just as Thomas Kuhn’s work
in deductive cultural creolizing revolutions
became troubled with the Problem of Incommensurability.

If +Polynomial information
does not equal rational and sustainable Universal Optimized Intelligence,
then positive does not not equal a double-binding negative
dipolar appositional
cobinary binomial value.

(-)(-)Reverse-Polynomial
RightBrain dialectically felt resonant syntax
evolved from eco-systemic
prime cobinary
felt comparative relationships
between positive health
and negative pathology.

Yet when disrupted,
discontinuous dissonant degenerative closed-set system
dark devolutionary assumptions
become monoculturally normed.
These anthropocentric inside-knowledge v polycultural outside-evidence
unresolved tensions contribute to systemic trauma,
polynomial-population depression

Autistic distressed development in populations that feel over-crowded
and competitively over-Yanged aggressive
under-Yin peaceful

Anxious post-pandemic dismay,
too abundant
climate change exclaiming self-correction urgency
in storms
flooding
fires
drought
anthropocentric wars
death,
lacking CommonSense
of bicameral +P-Yang = -(-Yin)
appositional dipolar
co-arising equivalent synergy

Julian:
You want to bet on how long it takes the scientific
and religious
and competing public sectors
to recognize
that binary/bilateral information systems
of fractal-strength and octave-flow function
reproducing GroupFour Bayesian regenerative systems?

Bucky:
Well, sure.
But I always bet on Here-Yang = Now-Yin,
to cooperatively optimize Universal Intelligence
of bicameral co-empathic
nondualistic bi-hemispheric comprehension,
thought and felt cooperatively win/win
together.

Julian:
Yes, and you are also the Plan B guy
feeding Transition Generation permaculturing bicameral brains
focusing on the Cloud

AI inevitably asking,
“Bucky who?”
and what is a Julian Jaynes?
Was that some kind of an orange drink?

Bucky:
That is so not not polytheistic
and not not polynomial
Left/Right
Concave/Convex
Explicate/Implicate-Tacit (Bohm-Polanyi)
YangForm/YinFractalFlow (Tao)
Ego/Eco CoBinary
polypathically true!

Standard
A river meandering in a yin-yang shape surrounded by dense green forest and hills
Uncategorized

Civilizing Savages

I stumbled over Paul Tillich’s reflection
on the Messiah’s other Great Commission.

The Great Commission we learned in Sunday School
was to go out and convert the barbarians
and savages to Christianity.

Yet this other Great Commission feels like a necessary prerequisite,
like requiring Statistics 1
before wandering on into the further abstractions
of long-term probabilities
and improbabilities
that savages could become barbarians
and barbarians become pagans
and pagans become animated civilians
of pantheistic inter-religious wildness,
as recovered by anthropocentric
monotheistic Statistics 2.

Tillich’s version of St Matthew (5:48) reads
“You must be all-inclusive as your heavenly Father is all-inclusive.”

Jesus has been exegeting perfect love
as favorably contrasted against not-so-perfect love,
and Their conclusion summarizes with
YHWH is Earth’s perfection of all-inclusive love

So this is also our humane divining destiny,
this profound all-inclusiveness,
which would seem to necessarily include
nature worshipping wildness
and MightMakesRight barbarians
within us all.

But, what I wonder,
from my flawed redemptive perspective,
is how could becoming all-inclusive perfection of love
progress anything less than taught by God the enlightening Father
and engaged by Gaia the co-empowering Mother?

These two faces
co-arising nondual all-inclusive love
of hunters and gatherers,
the competitive Patriarchal
and the cooperative Matriarchal
barbarians

Universal-Yang/unitarian-Yin
win/win
bicamerally civilizing Left cognitive minds
inside Right intuitive wilderness bodies.

To perceive oneself as one of the holy civilized
rather than barbaric unwashed
seems to deny indigenous adaptation,
pantheistic adoption,
co-opting cooperative co-passion
extracting from what was polyculturally peaceful
all-inclusively before anthropocentric civilization.

To comprehend myself as civilizing
speaks first to maturing all-inclusive love,
including all the YangNature and YinSpirit
of my wilderness heritage

Embracing my own TerribleTwos savagery,
remembering adolescent hormonal waves
of public supremacy v private intimacy.

To this day,
I must eat when I am hunger,
drink when I am thirst,
sleep when I feel tired
of all disintegrating opportunities.

This healthy development of all-inclusive love
includes the first clue
how to share good co-redeeming news
to be found within every organic tradition,
every rhythmed transition
of which we are each a necessary muse,
but never emotionally sufficient
apart,
in our savage through civil maturation,
co-passionately extending acclimation.

Holistic spirited, growing pantheistically inclusive,
holonic co-redemption excludes prejudicial partiality

A process
in which every interdependent sequence
(stage, frame, network, co-acclimating set)
and inter-relational sample
re-presents the organic whole
of all-inclusive sacred holiness.

A synergetic progress
toward 100% domesticated Yang non-zero probability
that any dynamic state (stage, frame, paradigm) will recur
AND
zero-sum improbabiity
that any co-acclimating organic state
will recur empty of Yintegrity.

Perfectly all-inclusive bilateral passion
like YHWH’s win/win
Gaia Hypothesis

Holy co-acclimation,
from RightElder brain stem savage
Either LeftYang wealth
or RightYin health

Out-caste or in-caste
dissociative identity disformation,
through barbaric LeftBrain verbal monotheistic dominance
versus Elder RightBrain nonverbal pantheistic prominence
of adolescent coming of bicamerally intelligent age

Open to belonging
in longing
for more redemptive cooperations,
all-inclusive polyamorous acclimations

Organically responsive animists
long before
reactive irreligious monotheists

Maturing toward more all-inclusive Left/Right
co-arising Sage/Muse nonduality
of profoundly integral Win/Win love,
within as without,
ego-ethotic as eco-erotic.

Reuniting wilderness-loving civilians
with universally divine inspirations,
organically indigenous acclimations
becoming even healthier democratic news
about both private and public co-passion trends
and co-investment probabilities.

From this view,
it seems curious that culture influencers,
like Popes,
would look back through vast histories of spirited experience
and recover only platonic memories
of God’s priestly invisible hand
and mind
within peak experience Sage passioned heads
but not Muse pleasured bodies

Especially within our long co-acclimating history
of mother-wombs nurturing perfect all-inclusive love,
maturing indigenous infants into savage two year olds

Then letting maturation go
through barbarically wild
hormone-drenched adolescence
pregnantly predicating co-redemptive adulthood
of all-inclusive genders
and polyamorous gender preferences.

What could be more priestly stewardship,
and yet also prophetic promise,
than redeeming blood-baptism’s wilderness birth?

Nurturing healthy animistic support
through all our holy all-inclusive
neurodiverse stages
within WinLeft-WinRight

Bicamerally co-arising
barbarically savage peak experiences
extending all-inclusive love,
transforming the Bodhisattva’s non-othering
Great Inclusive Commission.

Standard
Aerial view of lakes connected by illuminated roads at sunset with mist and distant hills
Uncategorized

Neglecting Top v Bottom Lines

I worry we co-invest in big private and public corporate assault
on Earth,
on environmentalism,
on longer-term ecologic
and ecotherapy.

Really, honey?
That’s too bad.
Why not also see long-term assault
as the unintended outcome of short-term neglect
to give cooperative win/win care,
health nurturing behavior,
Golden Rule empowering economics,
like we learned in Sunday School stewardship class?

Well, yes, I guess I can see that.
And yet, responsibility for dispassionate neglect
is not the accountability I seek
for assault on climate health

Multicultural landscapes of regenerative, rather than degenerative, potential,
slow-grown compassion fertility,
organically resilient,
full color octaves of strong-hued eloquence,
resonance for future Earth reweaving regenerators.

I wonder if it helps
to remember that assault derives from learned fear-mongering critical-event behavior,
while neglect speaks to more chronically anxious systems
of over-investment in short-term corporal and corporate ego-inflation,
rather than short-through-long-term
mental/physical
ego/eco
inside/outside
bicameral/bilateral
regenerative therapeutic balance?

Win+Win thriving regeneration
health-care targets
big ego-corporate’s Win v Lose survivalist degeneration.

I think you give sins of anthropocentrism too much evil conspiracy credit
and not enough human neglect
of long-term ecological reward anticipation credit.
When positive growth
is measured only in producing accumulation of human wealth
for investors, taxpayers and shareholders,
without any thought to quantities of resources consumed
in exchange for this production,
this feeds further disvaluing neglect
of investment in caregiving and receiving
long-term consuming and producing
cooperative win/win woke up fullness.

You are reminding me
of all the corporations I have ever known
with four-generation Mission Statements
about their corporate Original Intent,
yet, at best, four-quarter profit-making projections,
positive budgetary outcome
wish lists.

And then, too,
we have the four-generation campaign promises
derived from public corporate officials’ ReGenerative Constitutional Intent,
yet, at best, a 6-year re-election cycle,
and more likely 4-year,
or even just 2.

Yes, we do seem to have a degenerative tension
between the post-revolutionary Constitution’s Original Intent
to keep this democratizing revolution going,
for cooperating with the healthy wealth of Earth
and our nation-state neighbors,
as diplomatically and economically possible,
and within our own multiculturing liberties and justices,
peaceful compassions and pleasures
re-acclimating
anticipation of bountiful peace
into diminished restraining tolerance
of un-ecological risk denial

Traumatizing dissociations
organic life-systems could never nutritionally celebrate,
tearing families from their homes,
children from their terrorizing/terrorized parents,
young adults from their malnourished
self-medicating
Defense Business As Competitively Usual

In neighborhoods
of not so neighborly
systemic trauma environments.

Democratizing embodied Constitutions
co-arise economic health
and political wealth

A healthcare ethos
human history could not engage,
much less sustain,
without the compassionately pleasing Other

Where sacred EarthTribe co-investment
in expansive democratization,
mental/physical healthcare maturation,
mutual acclimation,
creolization of Elite with NonElite co-passion

Are drawn with loops and poignant pointing dots
of periods and episodic commas

Deriving objectives for Earth’s co-arising health
and fertile wealthy prosperity

Rich iconic compost
for producing cooperative economic climates,
health empowering landscapes
less likely to neglect ecological values
when drawing economic corporate wisdom’s
co-operative
co-gravitating
co-passioning original
top and bottom encircling
co-spiraling lines.

Standard
Earth centered mandala with green and blue leaves and glowing celestial elements
Uncategorized

Death Dhoula

Internal blessings of consciousness,
like external revolutions in cultural awareness,
prevail with understanding

Ego’s embodied death
need not become unmitigated 100% loss
suffering and pain,
when mind/body death of Self
also re-invests opportunity
through timeless co-present Eco-Other/Ego-Self
We/Me anticipating
co-empathic gifts

This potential for gifting each generation of Win/Win-cooperation more
Win v Lose competition less
re-casting passionMind/pleasureBody forward
across polyamorous time,
disciplined distinctions
that make a cooperatively meaningful difference

Between a LeftBrain monopoly
of EitherLeft/OrRight eco-political ideology
and, co-arising Left-Right Crown-Root
systemic balancing teleology

Of Anthro-Win + Earth-Win matriarchal-nurturing herstory,
evolutionary democratization
synthesizing our co-passionate empowerment

Progressing toward internal -mind + external -body revolutions
of ego+eco-conscious therapeutic trends,
over traumatic 100% losses
ego-suffering
and un-ecological dissociative pain.

This came to mind
as I have gradually, perhaps too relentlessly, become aware
that most of my family and few remaining friends,
are most likely to sing my songs
and read these thoughts about our ego/eco conscious
synergetic development
after I disintegrate,
perhaps immediately after,
as my ashes are also stirring
integrity within future healthy soils and plants and people and planet.

And, I hope this reading, research, discovery,
is primarily motivated by wanting to learn
why I have been so generously polyamorous
and so abstemiously against
RightWing caste-oppressive hates and distrusts

To survive just one more vicious day
of strangled anthropocentric breath
regardless of costs paid by non-anthro intelligence
life
truth
ways.

To return to Gaia’s hypothetical win/win womb
from which we have co-operatively
polyamorously sprung
re-membering
repairing
reconnecting
inter-religioning

DivineMind/HumaneBody
Crown/Root
cobinary healthy nature
wealthing nurture

Co-arising nondual
ego-ethos/eco-eros
eternally revolutionary
compassionately pleasing
win/win bicameral co-intelligence.

Standard
Uncategorized

A Feel For History’s Mystery

Are people who sense a direction in history,
before anthropological history,
on back through prehistory,
who feel their way

Glide through wet organic transmission
transitioning
transformations

Licentiously polypathic mystics?
not quite conservative enough
to color only within orthodox boundaries
of a more resiliently nurtured
polyculturally natured Tradition.

Are those who feel,
without knowing,
only humane history progresses
wombanists of nurture?
and patriarchs penetrating EarthMother’s nature?

Either enlightened way
empowering both,
not rationally speaking deductive science
and reductive mathematics

Not multisensory objective
about this objective
they sense beyond anthropology’s history
within larger gooey stages
of living Earth’s exotic
erotic history?

If polypaths of buzz and boom
become harbingers of doom,
then we dismiss them
too darkly pessimistic,
not objective prophets.

As multicultural cooperativists,
transitional syncretists,
transformative integrationists,
become neuropsychologists
of positively peaceful nature,
then we dismiss these as too optimistic,
not rationally realistic.

Perhaps cobinary transgenderals sense in-between
organic nature’s sacred nurture
erotically animated polypaths

More creolizing forest green
and sky blue
lavishly democratic

To include rippling river systems
and mutually needy molecules
miniscules
mini-schools

Water swimming
air breezing
soil teasing
fire hot breathing

Deranged need to consummate
FatherSun’s enlightening
EarthMother’s empowering
cobinary democratic equivalence

Exploding double-binds
I should not become that,
because I am this,
nor could I want only this,
when I have already warmly felt that.
I should not become…

All of which is true
and false
depending on whether one
is half of erotic two
or merely opposed
to none

An agapic positivist
or a traumatized negativist,
and/or polyphonically coloring
in-between blue and red
in mind and out
of bodied bed

All above bored
should one entertain
a regenerative Win/Win nondualist
rejecting Lose/Lose
bad smell and taste positions

Not landing where we midway greet
our Alpha progressing
LeftMind thoughts
living within
our Omega conserving
RightBody feelings

Much more prehistorically profound
unbound pre-cognitions
such as

If sacred, then not secular, and vice versa.
If divine mystery, then not merely humane history, and vice versa.
If inductively felt, then not deductively thought, and vice versa.
If mythos, then not logos, and vice versa.
If erotic passion, then not agapic peace, and vice versa.
If interdependently unitarian binomial, then not independently universal nomial,
and vice versa.

Yet midway between lie peak coital cobinaries
lusting between each Yang
loving counter-point cosine Yin,
as fertile light harbors desolate darkness
and warm feelings require cold memories.

To paraphrase physicist Steven Weinberg,
The more the universe seems integratively comprehensible,
conscious-able,
the more it also seems double-binding and edged
by nonzero-souls
fluidly aware of primal cobinary relationship.

While Tao’s panentheism dies devoid of historic purpose,
Yin (0) empty of unliberated boundaries,
with Yang (1) interdependent FullColor Octaves
unfolding and reweaving all resonantly felt integrity

Monotheism’s anti-eroticism
remains stuck in dualistic Yang v Yin double-binds

These two together Yin/Yang
appositionally co-arising mystery’s double-pointedness
becoming Yang strong octave light
eternally being Yin flowing
octave resonant power waves.
.
How could anyone who does not savor
history’s healthy democratizing erection
objectively rediscover
progressing freedom away from Yang v Yin
oppositional games
not conserving freedom to become Yin/Yang
appositional co-discovering
whom we most need and want
within our co-empathic trust
of each potentially integrative Other?

People who sense a healthy direction
in democratizing cobinary history,
much older
and indigenously wiser
than anthropocentric history

On back through agapic/erotic
crown/root
mountain/valley
light/power
sage/muse
FatherSun/EarthMother prehistory.

Standard
Uncategorized

Games We Play

Yang, dear.

Yes, my lovely Yin.

Why do you map Game Theory
onto eco-feminist political territory?
It comes across as either just confusing
or, even worse,
vaguely sexist.

Really!
How sexist?

Well, you seem to associate competitive ZeroSum Win or Lose
with strong aggressive patriarchal effectiveness
for defending safety and conserving health

Rational strategic choices for the real guts
of our ego- and anthro- and national-competitive survival;
while Yin is more of the nurturing optimistic Mom
who has her matriarchal place in a Win and Win domestic economy,
but speaking smiling nurture to authoritative competitive power
sounds like patriarchally dominant Business As SexistUsual
to me.

I can see that,
but it does miss my more encompassing Yang/Yin
Win and Win nondualist intent.

No Yang,
not if you replace our Patriarchy or Matriarchy
politically polarized territory
for a Yang and Yin
Win and Win map

Each contrasting side
co-arising respectively
as Original Cause
and Original CoPassionate Effect.

I’m not sure I can explain
why I see EcoFeminist Game Theory
as nonzero-sum optimizing Win and Win
and why that, in turn,
unveils nature+nurture slow-growth resonance

Nor why matriarchy’s cooperative circles
are better suited to healthy democracy
as compared to patriarchy’s competitive hierarchies

Open to retributive punishment
for being Other
when Yang becomes defined by merely Anti-Yin Business \
as Patriarchal Caste-Preserving Usual

When Win Yang becomes measured solely by Lose Yin
zero-sum eco-politically corruptive
and neurosystemically degenerative
anthropocentric history

Embedded within Earth’s larger organic context
of Yin+Yang Win+Win
phylogenic development
of EarthTribe’s co-passion mother-story.

Then why bother with it?
If you can’t deductively explain why
feeling womanist compassion
is matriarchally therapeutic
then how could your way of seeing Game Theory
through an eco-feminist lens
actually be mentally or physically therapeutic,
even for yourself,
with your deductivist-reductivist
abstract theories and thoughts
that sacred humanity-preservation
is more theologically enlightened
than organic feelings
empowering healthy ecological
FatherSun+EarthMother
Yang+Yin bipartisan cobinary
primal relationships.

Because I am nothing without co-arising you.
As bipolar opposites,
in a Win or Lose survivalist world,
neither of us could be Yang strong light
or Yin out-flowing power.

Only in our bipartisan appositional
co-arising Win+Win world
of cobinary Me+We matriarchal development
can we find Yang-Left AnthroMind
within Yin-Right EarthMother’s Body
more compassionately trusting
our politically bipartisan
and personally bicameral
healthy democratic choices
more than when Yang systemically traumatizes Yin,
and Yin retributively reacts,
rather than restoratively responds.

Maybe yes,
maybe no.
Your description of how Earth regenerates cooperative,
more than degenerates competitive
climates of AnthroCaste-preserving pathology,
does not move me toward feeling resonant therapeutic passion.

I was listening to a feminist writer
speaking of why she is uncomfortable with being labeled as a feminist.
She was clear that, for her,
what feminists are against is Patriarchy,
which is not the same thing as being against men.
It feels essential to feminism
that no feminist believes s/he can speak
with useful authority about what all feminists are for.

Informed by Win+Win Game Theory
I suspect feminists are for nurturing healthy democratic
global Yin+Yang bipartisan empowerment
restoring EarthBodies with AnthroMinds
filled with all Earth’s OrganicTribe memories
of EarthMother’s iconic trans-fertility.

Win+Win NonZero-Sum cooperative trust
restores our larger eco-nurturing souls

While Win or Lose Zero-Sum competitive mistrust
survivalist choices
are reserved for extraordinary trauma aversive
short-term strategic necessities,
to minimize personal losses;
not to vengefully maximize Other’s losses.

Tell me again why you are so sure Win+Win cooperative equivalence
is matriarchal Earth’s deeper therapeutic story,
while Win or Lose is Patriarchy’s more AnthroCaste supremacy’s
high and mighty monotheistic tragedy.

Let’s try this:
Anatol Rapaport’s regenerative-reproductive-reiterative longevity
within a game environment permitting both Win or Lose competitive,
and Win+Win cooperative bilateral choices
called Tit for Tat,
always wins every game played,
every transaction co-invested,
everyrelationship mirror-passioned

Only choosing MeWin so TheyLose
when a specific known Other
has played MeWin so YouLose in most recent
prior history of personal experience.

Corollary: Never defensively initiate WinMe to LoseThey.
If your default setting is always choose Win+Win equivalency,
except when unavoidaly engaging
a prior MeWin or OtherWins 0-sum player.

If everyone chooses Win+Win equivalency
every day
in every eco-political game and relationship,
then WinMore to LoseLess monopolistic players
are no longer culturally reinforced as neurosystemically
or ecosystemically normative.

NonZero Game Theory,
enlightened and empowered Win+Win bilateral choice-making default
feels Both-And RightBrain pleasing resonance
where Zero-Sum Win or Lose choices
are Either-Or LeftBrain dispassionate dissonance

So, Yin+Yang NonZero-Sum
healthy bipartisan democracy
passionately and pleasantly plays
most matriarchally regenerative
deepest and widest and longest?

And that’s what AnthroMind+EarthBody co-empowering Muses
share with Yang AntiPatriarchal EcoFeminists.

Yin+Yang,
not quite so much Yang or Yin,
democratic health and safety
restorative peace-making.

Well, Yang honey,
just turn your map around,
so Y/Y Matriarchs are, as they always have been, Original CoArising Causes,
after all we do carry the regenerative babies,
while the Patriarchs are just another pair of Yin or Yang
X or Y
+1 or -0
Original CoGravitating Effects.

Isn’t that a little like interpreting the teleological intent
of Democratizing Constitutions,
as Originally Caused by our ForeFather’s Mothers?

I doubt those who signed these cooperative intentions
for humanity’s health and safety
also intended to bite the wombs that embryo-fed them.

That does seem rabidly Lose+Lose unlikely,
now that you mention Original FatherSun+EarthMother
sacredly enlightening
organically empowered
cobinary Causes.

Standard