Tag Archives: nondualism

Blue brain and green leaf glowing and merging with light connections
Uncategorized

Same Old Differences

Why is it that philosophers and scientists,
politicians and even theologians
expect more bountiful outcomes
from relentlessly segregating
and disparately defining
what their passions
and great pleasures
are not?

Positive definitions
lie within
these negative defensive boundaries
of what it,
whatever “it” may be,
is not.

Religion is not science
and philosophy disregards the merely scientific
and scientific religions are an abomination
(too totalitarian, you see)
and history is none of the above,
yet speaks all of the above
about all of those below,
especially if they presented themselves
as unmitigatedly straight
purely white
exceptional men.

These traditions born of human experience
grow paradigmatic double-binding walls
to define what’s healthy in
by what’s best out.

Yet, ecology of natural/spiritual
both physical
and metaphysical
nondualistic systems
respects no oppositional boundaries
and all appositional contrasts

Where history/herstory is Earth’s organic story
unfolding co-passionate reunion,
leftbrain scientifically formed
and rightbrain religiously flowing

Remembering
reincarnating
reweaving
reconnecting
re-ligioning
nondual co-arising con-science
ecology of karmic grace
through Gaia’s climate healthy wealth

Compromised by encroaching eco-political
anthropological
and too-industrial
climate pathologies
of inhumane competing hubris.

Western religious traditions
may differ from Eastern
through telling an historically embedded tale
of universal organic empowerment
rather than timeless nondual metaphysics
of becoming sacredly enlightened
EarthTribe unitarians

Yet both are within one ecological umbrella
of passionate mind
and pleasured body
contenting and co-arising regenerativity

Climate health reversing decompositional degenerativity
as further Too AnthropoCentric Busyness
competitively hunting and devouring
far more than gathering and absorbing

Cooperative counter-balancing
draws LeftBrain scientific thought
and RightBrain religious feeling
boundaries
around what God/dess Earth
has brought nutritionally
married together.

Scientific philosophers,
and sometimes even religious theologians,
find healthier and more regenerative
passionate policies
and pleasing procedures
for refining how our ecological loves
remain great transitionally storied
indigenously cooperative pursuits
of comprehensive integrity.

Standard
Uncategorized

Bucky Fuller and Julian Jaynes

Buckminster Fuller and Julian Jaynes
recently reviewed their cultural and scientific influence
on health and well-being,
economically ecological outcomes,
during our current NonDual Transitional Era.

Bucky:
I wish I had spent more time speaking as a Unitarian Positive Teleologist.
Perhaps that would have taken care of my diminished trends in cultural awareness
of what,
in retrospect,
was exhaustively published
but not really read or fully contemplated,
now undervalued and ignorantly ignored:

  1. “Synergy,”
    everything I ever published about the topic of “synergy,”
    geometrically and spiritually defining integrity,
    in Western cultures,
    sacredly and organically refining compassion,
    in nondualistic Eastern traditions.
  2. The encoded regenerative fractal structure of Physical Universal Intelligence
    follows DNA/RNA thermodynamic,
    electromagnetic,
    permacultural,
    economic,
    psychological and sociological and political,
    and ecological Prime Yang/Yin Relationship balance;

and evolutionary dynamics are fractal-dipolar revolving
harmonic Convex-Exterior-Yang OVER Concave-Interior-Yin
(0)-Core Vector Rooted octaves
with branching tree structures

Running into Lin Yutang and Taoism before I published,
I could have connected Yang metaphysical perspectives
with Convex-Exterior physical principles,
and Yin metaphysics with Concave-Interior physical feelings
of bicameral neurosystemic flow
double-binding both LeftYang
andRightYin
dipolar nondual consciousness.

Julian:
Yes,
I can see that same sense of ethological
and ecological
and teleological dynamic
emergent awareness embracing LeftBrain’s evolution
speaking out from multigenerational RNA
regenerative intelligence
of RightBrain affective memory.

My neural theory of nonverbal nondualistic RghtBrain
underlying newer verbal LeftBrain information processing,
anthropological learning development,
seems to support your equivalency
between ethotic “synergy”
and subconscious erotic polyamorous integrity

And positive neuropsychological eco-politics
rooted in co-empathic bicameral trust

As well as Gregori Perelman’s fractal prime work,
and William Thurston’s dialectical too,
in fractal-prime Group Theory,
and I wonder if there isn’t something in there that pertains to the ecologistics
and statistical/strategic win/win predictions
of CoBinary Game Theory

Using reverse-hierarchy Win+Win assumptions.
You know,
so no one id-entity can optimally win
until the severed links in our great chain of interdependence
achieves equivalent body/mind
pleasure/passion
eros/ethos
felt/thought polyamorous values?

Bucky:
Absolutely.
Synergy and love retain universal multicultural integrity,
polycultural resilience,
harmony between Left-languaged deductive memory
and Right-nonverbal inductively felt codex
of positive v. negative feeling
experiential, yet multigenerational, awareness,
like what Polanyi calls “Personal Knowledge.”

Julian:
So synergy and love and confluence
are neurologically acclimated to messages
that do not cause cognitive dissonance,
disease,
dismay,
lack of equivalent appositional balance
and dipolar rhapsody.

Compassionate bicameral mindfulness
restores ego/eco-comprehensive connection
optimized through balancing Left-brained Yang
and Right-brained Yin
ego/eco functions.

Bucky:
Yes, I wish the Clay Math Challenge folks could have recognized
and celebrated
that Synergetics is really all about Polynomial v. Not-Polynomial information
lack of bicameral integrity v. not not binomial problem
of nondualistic ambiguity

Just as Thomas Kuhn’s work
in deductive cultural creolizing revolutions
became troubled with the Problem of Incommensurability.

If +Polynomial information
does not equal rational and sustainable Universal Optimized Intelligence,
then positive does not not equal a double-binding negative
dipolar appositional
cobinary binomial value.

(-)(-)Reverse-Polynomial
RightBrain dialectically felt resonant syntax
evolved from eco-systemic
prime cobinary
felt comparative relationships
between positive health
and negative pathology.

Yet when disrupted,
discontinuous dissonant degenerative closed-set system
dark devolutionary assumptions
become monoculturally normed.
These anthropocentric inside-knowledge v polycultural outside-evidence
unresolved tensions contribute to systemic trauma,
polynomial-population depression

Autistic distressed development in populations that feel over-crowded
and competitively over-Yanged aggressive
under-Yin peaceful

Anxious post-pandemic dismay,
too abundant
climate change exclaiming self-correction urgency
in storms
flooding
fires
drought
anthropocentric wars
death,
lacking CommonSense
of bicameral +P-Yang = -(-Yin)
appositional dipolar
co-arising equivalent synergy

Julian:
You want to bet on how long it takes the scientific
and religious
and competing public sectors
to recognize
that binary/bilateral information systems
of fractal-strength and octave-flow function
reproducing GroupFour Bayesian regenerative systems?

Bucky:
Well, sure.
But I always bet on Here-Yang = Now-Yin,
to cooperatively optimize Universal Intelligence
of bicameral co-empathic
nondualistic bi-hemispheric comprehension,
thought and felt cooperatively win/win
together.

Julian:
Yes, and you are also the Plan B guy
feeding Transition Generation permaculturing bicameral brains
focusing on the Cloud

AI inevitably asking,
“Bucky who?”
and what is a Julian Jaynes?
Was that some kind of an orange drink?

Bucky:
That is so not not polytheistic
and not not polynomial
Left/Right
Concave/Convex
Explicate/Implicate-Tacit (Bohm-Polanyi)
YangForm/YinFractalFlow (Tao)
Ego/Eco CoBinary
polypathically true!

Standard
A river meandering in a yin-yang shape surrounded by dense green forest and hills
Uncategorized

Civilizing Savages

I stumbled over Paul Tillich’s reflection
on the Messiah’s other Great Commission.

The Great Commission we learned in Sunday School
was to go out and convert the barbarians
and savages to Christianity.

Yet this other Great Commission feels like a necessary prerequisite,
like requiring Statistics 1
before wandering on into the further abstractions
of long-term probabilities
and improbabilities
that savages could become barbarians
and barbarians become pagans
and pagans become animated civilians
of pantheistic inter-religious wildness,
as recovered by anthropocentric
monotheistic Statistics 2.

Tillich’s version of St Matthew (5:48) reads
“You must be all-inclusive as your heavenly Father is all-inclusive.”

Jesus has been exegeting perfect love
as favorably contrasted against not-so-perfect love,
and Their conclusion summarizes with
YHWH is Earth’s perfection of all-inclusive love

So this is also our humane divining destiny,
this profound all-inclusiveness,
which would seem to necessarily include
nature worshipping wildness
and MightMakesRight barbarians
within us all.

But, what I wonder,
from my flawed redemptive perspective,
is how could becoming all-inclusive perfection of love
progress anything less than taught by God the enlightening Father
and engaged by Gaia the co-empowering Mother?

These two faces
co-arising nondual all-inclusive love
of hunters and gatherers,
the competitive Patriarchal
and the cooperative Matriarchal
barbarians

Universal-Yang/unitarian-Yin
win/win
bicamerally civilizing Left cognitive minds
inside Right intuitive wilderness bodies.

To perceive oneself as one of the holy civilized
rather than barbaric unwashed
seems to deny indigenous adaptation,
pantheistic adoption,
co-opting cooperative co-passion
extracting from what was polyculturally peaceful
all-inclusively before anthropocentric civilization.

To comprehend myself as civilizing
speaks first to maturing all-inclusive love,
including all the YangNature and YinSpirit
of my wilderness heritage

Embracing my own TerribleTwos savagery,
remembering adolescent hormonal waves
of public supremacy v private intimacy.

To this day,
I must eat when I am hunger,
drink when I am thirst,
sleep when I feel tired
of all disintegrating opportunities.

This healthy development of all-inclusive love
includes the first clue
how to share good co-redeeming news
to be found within every organic tradition,
every rhythmed transition
of which we are each a necessary muse,
but never emotionally sufficient
apart,
in our savage through civil maturation,
co-passionately extending acclimation.

Holistic spirited, growing pantheistically inclusive,
holonic co-redemption excludes prejudicial partiality

A process
in which every interdependent sequence
(stage, frame, network, co-acclimating set)
and inter-relational sample
re-presents the organic whole
of all-inclusive sacred holiness.

A synergetic progress
toward 100% domesticated Yang non-zero probability
that any dynamic state (stage, frame, paradigm) will recur
AND
zero-sum improbabiity
that any co-acclimating organic state
will recur empty of Yintegrity.

Perfectly all-inclusive bilateral passion
like YHWH’s win/win
Gaia Hypothesis

Holy co-acclimation,
from RightElder brain stem savage
Either LeftYang wealth
or RightYin health

Out-caste or in-caste
dissociative identity disformation,
through barbaric LeftBrain verbal monotheistic dominance
versus Elder RightBrain nonverbal pantheistic prominence
of adolescent coming of bicamerally intelligent age

Open to belonging
in longing
for more redemptive cooperations,
all-inclusive polyamorous acclimations

Organically responsive animists
long before
reactive irreligious monotheists

Maturing toward more all-inclusive Left/Right
co-arising Sage/Muse nonduality
of profoundly integral Win/Win love,
within as without,
ego-ethotic as eco-erotic.

Reuniting wilderness-loving civilians
with universally divine inspirations,
organically indigenous acclimations
becoming even healthier democratic news
about both private and public co-passion trends
and co-investment probabilities.

From this view,
it seems curious that culture influencers,
like Popes,
would look back through vast histories of spirited experience
and recover only platonic memories
of God’s priestly invisible hand
and mind
within peak experience Sage passioned heads
but not Muse pleasured bodies

Especially within our long co-acclimating history
of mother-wombs nurturing perfect all-inclusive love,
maturing indigenous infants into savage two year olds

Then letting maturation go
through barbarically wild
hormone-drenched adolescence
pregnantly predicating co-redemptive adulthood
of all-inclusive genders
and polyamorous gender preferences.

What could be more priestly stewardship,
and yet also prophetic promise,
than redeeming blood-baptism’s wilderness birth?

Nurturing healthy animistic support
through all our holy all-inclusive
neurodiverse stages
within WinLeft-WinRight

Bicamerally co-arising
barbarically savage peak experiences
extending all-inclusive love,
transforming the Bodhisattva’s non-othering
Great Inclusive Commission.

Standard
Aerial view of lakes connected by illuminated roads at sunset with mist and distant hills
Uncategorized

Neglecting Top v Bottom Lines

I worry we co-invest in big private and public corporate assault
on Earth,
on environmentalism,
on longer-term ecologic
and ecotherapy.

Really, honey?
That’s too bad.
Why not also see long-term assault
as the unintended outcome of short-term neglect
to give cooperative win/win care,
health nurturing behavior,
Golden Rule empowering economics,
like we learned in Sunday School stewardship class?

Well, yes, I guess I can see that.
And yet, responsibility for dispassionate neglect
is not the accountability I seek
for assault on climate health

Multicultural landscapes of regenerative, rather than degenerative, potential,
slow-grown compassion fertility,
organically resilient,
full color octaves of strong-hued eloquence,
resonance for future Earth reweaving regenerators.

I wonder if it helps
to remember that assault derives from learned fear-mongering critical-event behavior,
while neglect speaks to more chronically anxious systems
of over-investment in short-term corporal and corporate ego-inflation,
rather than short-through-long-term
mental/physical
ego/eco
inside/outside
bicameral/bilateral
regenerative therapeutic balance?

Win+Win thriving regeneration
health-care targets
big ego-corporate’s Win v Lose survivalist degeneration.

I think you give sins of anthropocentrism too much evil conspiracy credit
and not enough human neglect
of long-term ecological reward anticipation credit.
When positive growth
is measured only in producing accumulation of human wealth
for investors, taxpayers and shareholders,
without any thought to quantities of resources consumed
in exchange for this production,
this feeds further disvaluing neglect
of investment in caregiving and receiving
long-term consuming and producing
cooperative win/win woke up fullness.

You are reminding me
of all the corporations I have ever known
with four-generation Mission Statements
about their corporate Original Intent,
yet, at best, four-quarter profit-making projections,
positive budgetary outcome
wish lists.

And then, too,
we have the four-generation campaign promises
derived from public corporate officials’ ReGenerative Constitutional Intent,
yet, at best, a 6-year re-election cycle,
and more likely 4-year,
or even just 2.

Yes, we do seem to have a degenerative tension
between the post-revolutionary Constitution’s Original Intent
to keep this democratizing revolution going,
for cooperating with the healthy wealth of Earth
and our nation-state neighbors,
as diplomatically and economically possible,
and within our own multiculturing liberties and justices,
peaceful compassions and pleasures
re-acclimating
anticipation of bountiful peace
into diminished restraining tolerance
of un-ecological risk denial

Traumatizing dissociations
organic life-systems could never nutritionally celebrate,
tearing families from their homes,
children from their terrorizing/terrorized parents,
young adults from their malnourished
self-medicating
Defense Business As Competitively Usual

In neighborhoods
of not so neighborly
systemic trauma environments.

Democratizing embodied Constitutions
co-arise economic health
and political wealth

A healthcare ethos
human history could not engage,
much less sustain,
without the compassionately pleasing Other

Where sacred EarthTribe co-investment
in expansive democratization,
mental/physical healthcare maturation,
mutual acclimation,
creolization of Elite with NonElite co-passion

Are drawn with loops and poignant pointing dots
of periods and episodic commas

Deriving objectives for Earth’s co-arising health
and fertile wealthy prosperity

Rich iconic compost
for producing cooperative economic climates,
health empowering landscapes
less likely to neglect ecological values
when drawing economic corporate wisdom’s
co-operative
co-gravitating
co-passioning original
top and bottom encircling
co-spiraling lines.

Standard
Earth centered mandala with green and blue leaves and glowing celestial elements
Uncategorized

Death Dhoula

Internal blessings of consciousness,
like external revolutions in cultural awareness,
prevail with understanding

Ego’s embodied death
need not become unmitigated 100% loss
suffering and pain,
when mind/body death of Self
also re-invests opportunity
through timeless co-present Eco-Other/Ego-Self
We/Me anticipating
co-empathic gifts

This potential for gifting each generation of Win/Win-cooperation more
Win v Lose competition less
re-casting passionMind/pleasureBody forward
across polyamorous time,
disciplined distinctions
that make a cooperatively meaningful difference

Between a LeftBrain monopoly
of EitherLeft/OrRight eco-political ideology
and, co-arising Left-Right Crown-Root
systemic balancing teleology

Of Anthro-Win + Earth-Win matriarchal-nurturing herstory,
evolutionary democratization
synthesizing our co-passionate empowerment

Progressing toward internal -mind + external -body revolutions
of ego+eco-conscious therapeutic trends,
over traumatic 100% losses
ego-suffering
and un-ecological dissociative pain.

This came to mind
as I have gradually, perhaps too relentlessly, become aware
that most of my family and few remaining friends,
are most likely to sing my songs
and read these thoughts about our ego/eco conscious
synergetic development
after I disintegrate,
perhaps immediately after,
as my ashes are also stirring
integrity within future healthy soils and plants and people and planet.

And, I hope this reading, research, discovery,
is primarily motivated by wanting to learn
why I have been so generously polyamorous
and so abstemiously against
RightWing caste-oppressive hates and distrusts

To survive just one more vicious day
of strangled anthropocentric breath
regardless of costs paid by non-anthro intelligence
life
truth
ways.

To return to Gaia’s hypothetical win/win womb
from which we have co-operatively
polyamorously sprung
re-membering
repairing
reconnecting
inter-religioning

DivineMind/HumaneBody
Crown/Root
cobinary healthy nature
wealthing nurture

Co-arising nondual
ego-ethos/eco-eros
eternally revolutionary
compassionately pleasing
win/win bicameral co-intelligence.

Standard
Uncategorized

A Feel For History’s Mystery

Are people who sense a direction in history,
before anthropological history,
on back through prehistory,
who feel their way

Glide through wet organic transmission
transitioning
transformations

Licentiously polypathic mystics?
not quite conservative enough
to color only within orthodox boundaries
of a more resiliently nurtured
polyculturally natured Tradition.

Are those who feel,
without knowing,
only humane history progresses
wombanists of nurture?
and patriarchs penetrating EarthMother’s nature?

Either enlightened way
empowering both,
not rationally speaking deductive science
and reductive mathematics

Not multisensory objective
about this objective
they sense beyond anthropology’s history
within larger gooey stages
of living Earth’s exotic
erotic history?

If polypaths of buzz and boom
become harbingers of doom,
then we dismiss them
too darkly pessimistic,
not objective prophets.

As multicultural cooperativists,
transitional syncretists,
transformative integrationists,
become neuropsychologists
of positively peaceful nature,
then we dismiss these as too optimistic,
not rationally realistic.

Perhaps cobinary transgenderals sense in-between
organic nature’s sacred nurture
erotically animated polypaths

More creolizing forest green
and sky blue
lavishly democratic

To include rippling river systems
and mutually needy molecules
miniscules
mini-schools

Water swimming
air breezing
soil teasing
fire hot breathing

Deranged need to consummate
FatherSun’s enlightening
EarthMother’s empowering
cobinary democratic equivalence

Exploding double-binds
I should not become that,
because I am this,
nor could I want only this,
when I have already warmly felt that.
I should not become…

All of which is true
and false
depending on whether one
is half of erotic two
or merely opposed
to none

An agapic positivist
or a traumatized negativist,
and/or polyphonically coloring
in-between blue and red
in mind and out
of bodied bed

All above bored
should one entertain
a regenerative Win/Win nondualist
rejecting Lose/Lose
bad smell and taste positions

Not landing where we midway greet
our Alpha progressing
LeftMind thoughts
living within
our Omega conserving
RightBody feelings

Much more prehistorically profound
unbound pre-cognitions
such as

If sacred, then not secular, and vice versa.
If divine mystery, then not merely humane history, and vice versa.
If inductively felt, then not deductively thought, and vice versa.
If mythos, then not logos, and vice versa.
If erotic passion, then not agapic peace, and vice versa.
If interdependently unitarian binomial, then not independently universal nomial,
and vice versa.

Yet midway between lie peak coital cobinaries
lusting between each Yang
loving counter-point cosine Yin,
as fertile light harbors desolate darkness
and warm feelings require cold memories.

To paraphrase physicist Steven Weinberg,
The more the universe seems integratively comprehensible,
conscious-able,
the more it also seems double-binding and edged
by nonzero-souls
fluidly aware of primal cobinary relationship.

While Tao’s panentheism dies devoid of historic purpose,
Yin (0) empty of unliberated boundaries,
with Yang (1) interdependent FullColor Octaves
unfolding and reweaving all resonantly felt integrity

Monotheism’s anti-eroticism
remains stuck in dualistic Yang v Yin double-binds

These two together Yin/Yang
appositionally co-arising mystery’s double-pointedness
becoming Yang strong octave light
eternally being Yin flowing
octave resonant power waves.
.
How could anyone who does not savor
history’s healthy democratizing erection
objectively rediscover
progressing freedom away from Yang v Yin
oppositional games
not conserving freedom to become Yin/Yang
appositional co-discovering
whom we most need and want
within our co-empathic trust
of each potentially integrative Other?

People who sense a healthy direction
in democratizing cobinary history,
much older
and indigenously wiser
than anthropocentric history

On back through agapic/erotic
crown/root
mountain/valley
light/power
sage/muse
FatherSun/EarthMother prehistory.

Standard
Uncategorized

Games We Play

Yang, dear.

Yes, my lovely Yin.

Why do you map Game Theory
onto eco-feminist political territory?
It comes across as either just confusing
or, even worse,
vaguely sexist.

Really!
How sexist?

Well, you seem to associate competitive ZeroSum Win or Lose
with strong aggressive patriarchal effectiveness
for defending safety and conserving health

Rational strategic choices for the real guts
of our ego- and anthro- and national-competitive survival;
while Yin is more of the nurturing optimistic Mom
who has her matriarchal place in a Win and Win domestic economy,
but speaking smiling nurture to authoritative competitive power
sounds like patriarchally dominant Business As SexistUsual
to me.

I can see that,
but it does miss my more encompassing Yang/Yin
Win and Win nondualist intent.

No Yang,
not if you replace our Patriarchy or Matriarchy
politically polarized territory
for a Yang and Yin
Win and Win map

Each contrasting side
co-arising respectively
as Original Cause
and Original CoPassionate Effect.

I’m not sure I can explain
why I see EcoFeminist Game Theory
as nonzero-sum optimizing Win and Win
and why that, in turn,
unveils nature+nurture slow-growth resonance

Nor why matriarchy’s cooperative circles
are better suited to healthy democracy
as compared to patriarchy’s competitive hierarchies

Open to retributive punishment
for being Other
when Yang becomes defined by merely Anti-Yin Business \
as Patriarchal Caste-Preserving Usual

When Win Yang becomes measured solely by Lose Yin
zero-sum eco-politically corruptive
and neurosystemically degenerative
anthropocentric history

Embedded within Earth’s larger organic context
of Yin+Yang Win+Win
phylogenic development
of EarthTribe’s co-passion mother-story.

Then why bother with it?
If you can’t deductively explain why
feeling womanist compassion
is matriarchally therapeutic
then how could your way of seeing Game Theory
through an eco-feminist lens
actually be mentally or physically therapeutic,
even for yourself,
with your deductivist-reductivist
abstract theories and thoughts
that sacred humanity-preservation
is more theologically enlightened
than organic feelings
empowering healthy ecological
FatherSun+EarthMother
Yang+Yin bipartisan cobinary
primal relationships.

Because I am nothing without co-arising you.
As bipolar opposites,
in a Win or Lose survivalist world,
neither of us could be Yang strong light
or Yin out-flowing power.

Only in our bipartisan appositional
co-arising Win+Win world
of cobinary Me+We matriarchal development
can we find Yang-Left AnthroMind
within Yin-Right EarthMother’s Body
more compassionately trusting
our politically bipartisan
and personally bicameral
healthy democratic choices
more than when Yang systemically traumatizes Yin,
and Yin retributively reacts,
rather than restoratively responds.

Maybe yes,
maybe no.
Your description of how Earth regenerates cooperative,
more than degenerates competitive
climates of AnthroCaste-preserving pathology,
does not move me toward feeling resonant therapeutic passion.

I was listening to a feminist writer
speaking of why she is uncomfortable with being labeled as a feminist.
She was clear that, for her,
what feminists are against is Patriarchy,
which is not the same thing as being against men.
It feels essential to feminism
that no feminist believes s/he can speak
with useful authority about what all feminists are for.

Informed by Win+Win Game Theory
I suspect feminists are for nurturing healthy democratic
global Yin+Yang bipartisan empowerment
restoring EarthBodies with AnthroMinds
filled with all Earth’s OrganicTribe memories
of EarthMother’s iconic trans-fertility.

Win+Win NonZero-Sum cooperative trust
restores our larger eco-nurturing souls

While Win or Lose Zero-Sum competitive mistrust
survivalist choices
are reserved for extraordinary trauma aversive
short-term strategic necessities,
to minimize personal losses;
not to vengefully maximize Other’s losses.

Tell me again why you are so sure Win+Win cooperative equivalence
is matriarchal Earth’s deeper therapeutic story,
while Win or Lose is Patriarchy’s more AnthroCaste supremacy’s
high and mighty monotheistic tragedy.

Let’s try this:
Anatol Rapaport’s regenerative-reproductive-reiterative longevity
within a game environment permitting both Win or Lose competitive,
and Win+Win cooperative bilateral choices
called Tit for Tat,
always wins every game played,
every transaction co-invested,
everyrelationship mirror-passioned

Only choosing MeWin so TheyLose
when a specific known Other
has played MeWin so YouLose in most recent
prior history of personal experience.

Corollary: Never defensively initiate WinMe to LoseThey.
If your default setting is always choose Win+Win equivalency,
except when unavoidaly engaging
a prior MeWin or OtherWins 0-sum player.

If everyone chooses Win+Win equivalency
every day
in every eco-political game and relationship,
then WinMore to LoseLess monopolistic players
are no longer culturally reinforced as neurosystemically
or ecosystemically normative.

NonZero Game Theory,
enlightened and empowered Win+Win bilateral choice-making default
feels Both-And RightBrain pleasing resonance
where Zero-Sum Win or Lose choices
are Either-Or LeftBrain dispassionate dissonance

So, Yin+Yang NonZero-Sum
healthy bipartisan democracy
passionately and pleasantly plays
most matriarchally regenerative
deepest and widest and longest?

And that’s what AnthroMind+EarthBody co-empowering Muses
share with Yang AntiPatriarchal EcoFeminists.

Yin+Yang,
not quite so much Yang or Yin,
democratic health and safety
restorative peace-making.

Well, Yang honey,
just turn your map around,
so Y/Y Matriarchs are, as they always have been, Original CoArising Causes,
after all we do carry the regenerative babies,
while the Patriarchs are just another pair of Yin or Yang
X or Y
+1 or -0
Original CoGravitating Effects.

Isn’t that a little like interpreting the teleological intent
of Democratizing Constitutions,
as Originally Caused by our ForeFather’s Mothers?

I doubt those who signed these cooperative intentions
for humanity’s health and safety
also intended to bite the wombs that embryo-fed them.

That does seem rabidly Lose+Lose unlikely,
now that you mention Original FatherSun+EarthMother
sacredly enlightening
organically empowered
cobinary Causes.

Standard
Uncategorized

TransForming Singing Circles

She started our rhapsody
of eco-resilient Wins
invoking ego-resonant Wins
from our Taoist Political Theory
songbook

By reminding us that defensive male Sopranos
have not always been diva dominant

In a prior emerging prehistory,
more of a musicology herstory,
when resilient Bass-Yang
and resonant Soprano-Yin
were both RightHand and LeftFoot coordinated
Win-Soprano and Win-Bass lovers

Happy singers
healthy dancing
ambidextrously resplendent

When not interrupted
by freeze
and flee
and fight

Basses vs Sopranos
become polarized
into cacophonous positions
of not respectfully listening
and/or co-passionate pleasure witnessing

Soprano Voice v Bass Choice
oppositional fighting parts
appositional fleeing departs
frozen in strangled positions apart

From Alto humming love
and Bare toned Bass
organic dancing life
in non-hierarchical
non-violent
non-verbally touching
deep sacred feeling
wellbeing thrival

Speaking while listening
singing while dancing
witnessing while engaging
in polyamorously polyphonic circles.

Then,
just as I was about to brain drain
fall into another afternoon nap,
They fled off script:

“So, here’s what really pisses me off”
S/he calmly says
without soprano exclamation,
as if too nearly exhausted
to expend further breath capacity

Deep-lunged passion
pleasure full-rooted
energy.

“Today in this DisUniting Choir,
formerly Bass and Soprano functional,
we invest dirty money and disingenuous time
in sacrificing sacred Earth’s singers
and Othered organic dancers”

“Since when does a healthy democracy
sing and dance for a homophobic future
gunning for every frozen
fleeing
fighting
failing White-Bassed Man
for his sick self.”

“While, at this very moment
in Anthropocene musicology
we need to bloom nature
and nurture singing Nations
dancing Muse Species
for thriving win/win
tribe encircling healthcare.”

“Instead
we elect divisive
and displeasing AntiHeroes
petulant diva denialists
without any disciplined
or educated
or mature musicology feelings
for health and safety.”

They proclaim
both feet planted,
rooted resilience
pleasing full-choir resonance.

“Any music conductor knows,
we can’t sing our way
toward United States wealth
without healthy United Nation witnesses
dancing EarthMother climate health
polyphonically swelling
wellbeing.”

Now S/he paces, stirred up.

“What the Hell kind of tragic comedy
is monotheistic
capital-infested
solo Soprano history?”

“Why would our collective intelligence
for optimizing health and wellbeing outcomes
wait for ‘Fat Ladies’ sic singing
Soprano v Bass survivalist operas
when we know grand trauma finales
always suck?”

Political
and social
and psychological
and theological
and even anthropological
dissonance risk
out singing resonance opportunity.

“What is worth risking
less future singers
uniting multicultural Nations
and polycultural Species?”

We began nervously looking around
what we expected to be our singing wisdom circle,
avoiding Their foot-tapping direction,
hoping Their questions were merely rhetorical

Some argument larger Sopranos struggle with
divided diva selves
while we,
mere mortals,
continue feeling like nothing
is worth dying for.

In the brief ensuing rest
I am surprised
we dance apart
Basses struggling against Sopranos
for all that is loss of resonant life.

We create AntiHeroes
without sufficient time to sing
love songs
growing what is worth living for

Call and response
from Bass healthy roots
and soaring Soprano dancing
in climate wellness circles

That feel rather too fat and long
calling out less robust diva responses
to what is worth dying for
or against

Restarting living rhapsody,
musicology culture Wins
for ecological climate Wins

Taoist Political CoPassion Theory,
Soprano singing
while Bass dancing
divine diva circles.

Standard
Uncategorized

Pleasing Answers Prefer Passionate Questions

Do heated questions hope to end with cool answers,
while pleasing answers never end
without yet more compassionate questions?

How are Case Studies
of anxious organic history
different than sacred Einstein’s
anticipating Thought Experiments?

Wait a minute…

Yes, well that’s not really a difference.
Thought Experiments and Case Studies
both begin with waiting a minute

to notice cause v effect assumptions,
to decompose bifurcated relationships
between sacredly interrelated organic parts

of what
and whom?

Imagining in reverse time,
from now as cause
back toward effects
leading up to my current favorite cause

current noticing,
sometimes chaotic and unsettling
waiting a minute
to notice struggling against

Feels worse
than struggling with?

Do brains
casing out disorganized thoughts
feel more important
than brawn?

And why is this different
than why that?

Does, or does not,
organic complexity
actively hope
for resonant riches?

Is this really democracy’s healthiest question to ask?

Within all Earth’s vast universe
of sacred questions,
could love invest in life more
instead of hell less?

Is this, more or less, probably more,
what you are trying to point out
before I interrupt your thoughtful minute?

Do democratic rulers
find Golden Rules flattering,
and their reverse fascinating?

When don’t richer Case outcomes
invite more fertile Thought Experiments?

Why have I never heard of,
but often experienced,
a dysfunctional paralysis case
for more dysfunctional family studies?

And how is that different than,
or the same as,
an unhealthy patriarchal
and unsafe capitalist
Case Study?

Wait a minute,
when did we begin
declaring positions
always remain the same
when not opposed?

to asking about appositions?

Do we all start with co-passionate noticing?

Can we reverse hot times
back through bio-eros networks
of bilateral climaxing opportunity?

Yes, I suppose so,
but Einstein’s Thought Experiments were metaphysical,
cold mathematics
and unnatural science,
Aren’t Case Studies more like watching non-pornographic Reality Shows,
weaponized capitalist, and usually strong-man, Disaster Movies,
Freudian Nightmares on Mean Sheets?

How do I know
you hope to respond
to your own questions
with better questions?

about how thought systems are the same
when they don’t feel different?

Sorry, honey,
do you agree or disagree,
or both, somehow,
that Einstein’s Experiments are about metaphysical operations
while Case Studies
are about physical and natural operas?

Wait, a minute…
no, that doesn’t sound ecologically correct,
nor feel logically helpful

Are we better
sticking with naturally stuck wealth
realities
or freeing Earth’s spiritually flowing health
relationships?

Didn’t Einstein hope his Thought Experiments would lead to Truth,
therefore, not also False,
much less Ugly?

Measuring statements about space and speed
revolving time
and gratuitous power

evolving mass
and volunteering light?

When you write extended Dysfunctional Family Case Studies,
do you hope you speak Truth
but not Beauty?

About positive,
and, unfortunately, negative energy,
(0)-sum speed of sharing light,
massively devolving power,
a feeling of insufficient healing time
for sufficient health and safety
final answers.

Why is Truth
not always Beauty?

Because that would be confusing

Winning facts
with loser feelings?

If you say so,
but if thoughts grow complex
when do feelings show chaotic risk
and calming climate opportunities?

Wait a minute.
Sorry love.
When do Thought Experiments shut down?

Either True or False premises?

When was the last time you indulged
winning thrival opportunities,
and not losing survival risks?

Writing a lively Case Study
about love’s Thought Experiments

In Win/Win
bilaterally climaxing
mind thought
and body felt
co-passion Cases?

Well, when you ask that way
you come across
less of a dispassionate
Me win vs You lose

Dominating ass?

Who wouldn’t have the first clue
how a dogmatic Life Case Study
might feel less inviting
than a dog-gone lovely Thought Experiment.

Wait a minute…
You’re doing thoughts again.

That thing where you LeftBrain explicate
answers
while I RightBrain implicate
questions?

That somehow do not really quite exist
just yet

Outside of spaceless now
and timeless here?

Biassed
in favor of ecstatic climax
erotic fireworks!

You’re just teasing me, aren’t you?
This cums down to foreplay
in your favorite Thought Experiment?

I feel so used.

Don’t pretend your gorgeous Case Study
doesn’t like it.

Could you talk a little dirtier,
and leave out the exploitive capital
and over-rated patriarchal parts?

Less sacredly surreal
and more organically earthy?

Ummm.
That sounds like you’re ready

to stop performing
and start engaging?

Baby,
you’re the writing Sage

Asking if you
are still my dancing Muse?

Does your musing question hope to end
sooner or later?

With only one most sage answer.

Do answers ever end experiments
without yet more amusing
Curious Study questions?

Wait a minute,
did we leave out
our sexy
and sacred climaxing parts?

My mind feels so bruised,

My body too unused?

Standard
Uncategorized

Type A! Cognitives Feeling Type B? Intuitives

I believe it was McLuhan who gave us
The medium is the message.
Here are a few other YinRoot and YangCrown
cobinary appositionals.

Interior mind impresses exterior body,
and survivalist-competitive messages
depress thrivalist-cooperative media.

The ecological cooperative transactor
is also the WinUpper +WinLower caste
politically democratic empowerer.

The economically competitive capital-fueled media
consume and then reproduce
the most politically compelling Upper-Caste passionate
v Lower-Caste pleasuring message.

LeftBrain dominant Either Upper Or Lower caste
evolutionary surviving reason
is also
RightBrain Both Upper And Lower caste
revolutionary thriving treason.

LeftBrain Elite cognitive messages
are also RightBrain NonElite intuitive media
of the nonverbal RightBrain Win+Win appositional frame
without verbal LeftBrain Win v Lose oppositional shame.

Loss Aversion biassed capitalist media
reproduce Caste Preservation biassed patriarchal messages.

The survivalist Either Win Or Lose risk
LeftBrain Dominant verbal
pain-focused media
overshadows
the thrivalist Both Win And Win opportunity
RightBrain Recessive nonverbal
pleasure-focused messages .

Win v Lose competitive economic risk
to Upper-Caste autocratic survival
of anthropocentric media
is also
Win + Win cooperative ecological opportunity
to Lower-Caste democratic thrival
of EarthCentered messages.

The political-anthropological reality
of YangCrown-verbalized
Win v Lose risk-aversion communication
framed as bipolar oppositional dispassion
is also
the economic-ecological relationship
of YinRoot-nonverbalized
Win+Win opportunity-optimization communication
flowing fluid dipolar appositional compassion

To paraphrase Antonio Damasio,
“The immune [risk aversion] system,
the [bilaterally autonomic emotion/behavior mediating] hypothalamus,
the ventro-medial frontal [bicameral-cobinary] cortices,
and the[anthropocentric] Bill of Rights
[and UpperCrown/LowerRoot Caste Original Democratization Constitutional Intent]
have the same [crown-message]
root cause.”

YinRoot Media CoPassionate NeuroSystems :
Cobinary win+win
+1CrownYang = -(-0)RootYin
polynomial equivalent opportunity values
of all neuro-sexsystemic
phylogenic crown/root EarthBodies,
pain-dispassion/pleasure-compassion co-mediated
democratically co-empathic intelligence

That Type A logically messaged
dispassionate risks
are also Type B ecologically co-mediated
compassionate opportunities.

Standard