Uncategorized

EarthTribe Shadows

Earth’s universal Shadow
shades whatever Earth is not.

Ego’s universal right-hemisphere Shadow
shades whatever EgoResources left is not.

What Earth’s potential positive win/win
sacred integrity is not
shades whatever negative Ego win/lose secularized morality is

Capital-invested in conserving privileged wealth
divorced from unprivileged decomposing health;

What Earth’s liberally positive win/win values
and potential health integrity
would more happily project
and transfer through mutual co-investment.

Egos stick in left-brain dominance
courageously fascinated
with negative unhealthy win/lose suboptimizing trends
derived from ZeroSum energy conservation games
to lose the least political face possible
over the largest period of fragmenting eco-systemic time
passes before lose/lose inevitable
egocentric economic mortality.

Just as Egos can more liberally balance left/right
multicultural prominence
curiously engaged in positive health
win/win integrity
not-not ZeroSum hypothetically hyphenated in-between
enlightening co-passioned games

To win the most faces,
hearts and minds,
spirits and natures,
nurtures and healthy nutrition
digestively possible

Over the shortest here/now
through timeless eternal
interdependent
bilaterally stretched out
without Shadow stressed in Time

As win/win inevitable ego/ecocentrism
balancing positive liberal shading negative not-not conservational
interdependent left/right
holistic-health/holy-wealth integrity
of co-passioning Promise,

Father/MotherLand inside/outside
Earth’s universal multiculturing Shadow,
in-between win/lose bipolar
political patience left
and win/win dipolar right
timeless ZeroSoul’s eco-celebration
cooperative affinity
compassioning integrity.

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Heaven’s HotHouse Humor

It’s not true
that Original Taoist Laotse
did not say
Laughter in response to his teachings
was his outcome indicator of deepest nature-spirit-mystery
comprehension.

It’s not true
that laughter could be disassociated from
agapic bliss
or erotic love.

It’s not true
that laughter can feel any distinction
worthy of a label difference
between erotic bodies and agapic minds,
nor did Laotse.

Where the body’s erotic love and economic terrors lead,
the political mind goes with and as and for and from.

Where mind’s agapic love
and political fears and angers merge,
eco-normic body value-transfers,
willingness to invest and divest,
go with and as and for and from.

How could erotic Yang historical-political nature
ever become separated from Yin’s spiritual-eco-normic agape?
except for decomposing laughter’s cosmic heath insurance issues
and promise of deeply discounted reassurance rates.

Standard