Darkly starkly sober
Winter’s cold solstice dream,
warm wealth of crisp greetings
anticipating bleached transparent white blanket,
Earth’s decomposing Season
Advent of timeless reason
hibernating bipolar consciousness
shy Owl Medicine’s silvery metamorphosis
bellowing full moon Moose Meditation
echoing wild wicked esteem
thru dark sober winter’s bold.
Tag Archives: consciousness
Merging with Co-Mentoring Light
Further conversation with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 184, 2011, SelectBooks, NY. My co-arising commentary in brackets.
“What I have discovered is that the very same [integrating] principle applies when we are trying to catalyze emergence at the [internal] level of [eco]consciousness and [of external eco]culture.
The [political and economic language balance] conditions must be [co-operatively] right.
In fact, I often use the metaphor of a ‘New Being’ to describe this emergent cosmocentric [holon of Sacred Earth] cultural potential [for cooperative revolution thru co-arising eco-consciousness of Ego as EcoOther].
Just as individual [RNA-fueled] cells came together to make up a larger [DNA-composted] organism, [imaginatively] autonomous, evolving individual [holonic-holy] human beings consciously come together to give rise [co-arise/co-decompose] to a dynamic greater [Beloved Community] whole.
And this emergent potential of [r]evolutionary [cooperative political with economic] Enlightenment is completely dependent upon those individual cells—those [fractally-syntaxed] autonomous, evolving [life-]beings—making the effort to understand [to give voice to] and be a [healthy loving] living expression of the [intuitively-deductively] inconceivably delicate balance of [Earth language] conditions that make it possible for [Her] to come into existence.” [to rejoin our cooperative thriving as Anthro of Earth’s Tribes, mutually parasitic eco-pilgrims toward (0)Mega ReLigion of ConScience, EcoCentric Consciousness.]
Esoteric EcoTerra
Nomial is to Relational
as
Subject is to Object
as
progenitorNoun is to actionVerb
as
Stimulus is to Response
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural is to Polycultural
as
+Yin is to +Yang/(-,-)Yin balancing
as
+/- Bicameral Owl Medicine is to full-bodied Moose Medicine’s
PolyCultural Timeless Party
Uracil articulates Love/Synergy
as Moose dominant positive.
Cytosine articulates Co-Integrative Peace
as Owl precessive/camouflage (shy) positive
Guanine articulates FearMongering
as Moose recessive-negative over-powering
Adenine articulates Anxiety/Anger/Depression
as Owl recessive-oppressed negative.
NounYin evokes VerbYang,
gender and culture equivalency of value
SelfValue emerges through MooseMed progenitive stimulation
with
OwlMeds bicamerally responsive to Other as Worthy,
together
EcoLogical In-Formation bilateral cooperation
network.
This bilaterality of seasoned polynomial language
emerges
assimiliterative enthymematic resonance
with
assimilaterative geometric assonance
regenerating
ecological wisdom compost for optimizing healthy wealth.
To respect
to look back, to regard from our past,
nature’s language is to empathize
with where we have chosen to come from.
To reconnect/repassion nature’s language,
inclusive of human,
but not so much dominated thereby,
is to empathize with Other’s basic right of freedom
toward positive dynamic functionality
for regenerative cooperation,
synergetic health,
love.
Owl’s YinYin Medicine for balancing eco-normics
is progenitive/precessive
toward
Yang Moose Medicinal PolyCultural Political Power
inclusive of all Earth’s universal positive healthy nature.
Cooperative economic peace is to yin’s Owl Medicine
as ecompassionate political power is to yang’s Moose Medicine.
We co-mentor
seeing
smelling
hearing
tasting
touching
feeling
absorbing
racing
engendering
comprehending
regenerating
Earth and Other as Yangprocessive-Yinrecessive Full-Fractal Harmonics,
not so much climatic Yang Left-brain domination,
but not too Yin Right-brain politically struggling shy of healthy ego/eco balanced esteem.
PostMillennial Taoists
cognize balance speaking through all Nature’s Earth-bound voices,
Nature does not always speak YinKin kind,
but Earth is not so Yang unkind either,
in full-double Namaste resonant response.
Spiritual Subjects are to Natural Objects
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural Political Language is to Polycultural EcoNormic Outcomes
as
PreMillennialism is to Post-Polypathic Millennialism
as
Struggling-Against Contentious Living co-arises Struggling-With Contented Loving
as
Bicameral Function co-arises Positive In-Formating Regeneration
as
Becoming is to Being
Conversation with Chris Santos-Lang
My internal conversation with you, Kramer, Bressan, and all our microbes, together, in brackets.
What “Letting People [and Places, including Earth] Be Themselves” Means
Chris Santos-Lang
In “Humans as Superorganisms: How Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes, and Other Selfish [Mutually-Struggling] Entities Shape Our Behavior,” Peter Kramer and Paola Bressan present evidence that we are [nondual] “not unitary individuals,” but rather “collections of human and nonhuman [RNA/DNA-regeneratively syntaxed] elements that…in an incessant [cooperatively contentious] struggle [default as positive ‘with’ and sometimes ‘negative reverse-synaptic’ against], jointly define who we are.” The research they highlight challenges those of us who want to ‘let people be themselves’ to explain precisely what we mean by “themselves [and ourselves.” If people are [nondual] not unitary individuals, then what could “themselves [as ourselves]” refer to?
The notion that we are not unitary individuals is not new. [Plato didacted the interdependence of intrinsically social beings, and the neoplatonists went wild with that core holonic universal view.] Quantum physicists have pointed out that every atom of our bodies is entangled with the entire universe [inclusive of both Bohm’s Explicate Order and Implicate Order and Buckminster Fuller’s Convex-Positive-Special Case v. Concave-Double-Bilateral-Reverse-String-Temporal Metaphysical Interior Eco-Cooperative TransParent Function-more or less], biologists have pointed out that less than 2% of those atoms remain in us for over a year, and psychologists have pointed out that the mechanisms of our [positive] cognition typically extend beyond our brains to include scratchpads, musical instruments, calculators, and the Internet [and extend back through time toward the distant progenitive-as-regenerative origins of fractal-syntaxed RNA]. Kramer and ressan add merely that our [economic] values [as objectives] and [political] preferences [as subjective progenitors]–what we call our “soul”–is just as entangled with our environment as are our other aspects.
In my opinion, the most compelling branch of their argument is the one relating to microbes. Only about 10% of the various types of [RNA/DNA fueled] cells our bodies require to flourish are [DNA] human. The rest are [RNA-uracil-rooted] microbes. Although most of the microbe studies cited by Kramer and Bressan were conducted on mice, it seems clear that the decisions humans make–how we vote, whom we marry, whether we commit a crime–depend upon which microbes dominate our internal [autonomic] ecosystem at the time. Thus, we can lose our [perception of autonomous] identity–the person our friends know us to be may cease to [monopolistically] inhabit our [mind-]bodies–not just through a lobotomy, but also through some combination of antibiotics and probiotics which irreversibly [or reversibly? I wonder?] tip the balance of power among the microbes within us.
Such microbes might be called parasites of our [mutually parasitic] bodies, but they cannot be parasites of [with?] our selves, for they are an essential part of who we are. Kramer and Bressan would argue that our rights belong to our entire internal [and external] ecosystem[ic landscapes], including those microbes. Laws to protect you [and Earth] must therefore take the form of laws to protect an ecosystem, not necessarily protecting particular microbes, but protecting [mutually parasitic reverse-hierarchically structured, increasingly cooperative metasystemic, with bilateral (concave/convex) spacetime, co-prehensive] balance among them. This sets the stage for shocking reform of our legal system and conception of human [as nature’s spiritua/ergodic/ionic/cogravitational] rights [of freedom to cooperate balancing freedom from struggling-against competition of Other].
Perhaps the paradigm of “selfish-survivalist” genes has been unduly influenced by a culturally jaundiced interpretation of Darwinian evolutionary struggle. But the default setting on Darwinian evolution is positive-regenerative, which would suggest struggling with others to maintain co-gravitational balance, perhaps defining what I mean by eco-normic cooperation. Nature’s biological systems seem to struggle against mutually negative {lose, lose} eco-gravitational disbalancing choices, which might be paradigmed as competitive eco-politics. Struggling is normatively neutral; “selfish” is not, and assumes a monocultural level of competitive-default objectives that is not supported by the regenerative fact that cooperative polyculturally organic nature, life, exists at all.
Summary Notes, Dillenbeck:
Cooperative economic subjects lead toward competitive, politically-healthy, objectives of eco-consciousness.
Struggling with suboptimized relationships avoids over-attachment to a moderately-healthy Win-Lose poly-econormic status-quo.
Struggling against suboptimally dissonant-yet-static relationships avoids over-detachment from a perceived-as-toxically-competitive (over-heated/drama climate) status-quo.
For more from Chris Santos-Lang, visit http://www.grinfree.com
Gaia and Fr. Time Are Lovers: True InFormating Scandal
Gaia’s love first embraces Earth’s tribes
who then embrace Her back
through Gaia’s co-redeemer enculturation gift,
pay-it-forward grace of permacultured history,
karma of EarthTribe’s economy,
mutually-parasitic subsidiarity
embracing universally regenerate Host
in political-through-personal empowering solidarity
of EarthTribe’s Eco-Passionate Universal Rights.
She paid the health assurance rent
we’ve been redeeming ever since.
And so it is
that Ego’s love invites EcoEarth’s co-passion,
mutually held holy compassion,
synergy of with for Earth’s co-redemptive Rights
embracing Gaia’s Universal Nest.
Not sure where this climatic
and over-heated story
of bicamerally diastatic love
as balance harmonic octaves
starts,
because love is timeless
in this sense
that it can go forward
only as it has emerged from past
except in bicameral systems,
where love,
as synergetically dynamic time of presence
is perceived and comprehended
as bilaterally unfolding.
For example,
bicameral lungs
autonomically know the difference and sameness
of Yang inhalation formation
and Yin exhalation flowing out frequencies.
As bicameral hearts
autonomically feel the difference and dipolar symmetry
of inflation toward diastatic Yang power
and recession away deep flat-line trending
toward static Yin-aptic Basic Attendance.
As bicameral mind-bodies comprehend
this balancing and permaculturing love story
of Universal Earth
and bilateral Fr. Time 0’Mega Science.
Once upon bilateral time,
Earth Day dawned her Birth of Passion Story,
co-passion story,
passion story,
reading with passive purgative passion
Her co-redemptive narrative
of cooperative
mutual subsidiarity
co-arising messianism.
Asked Earth of her ScienceSun,
“Can you truly love a rock,
or any of those static, sometimes dissonant, objects,
like egocentrism
anthro-centrism
or a steel-grey slate wall?”
No,
love is co-relational,
different than unilateral basic appreciation,
Basic Attendance
emerges love as positive enthymeme.
“How can we attend to love’s co-passion
in absence of its expressed return?
I fear I fade
my climate wilts
for lack of co-redemptive love
within my rightful seasons
of cooperative power
and ecological flow.”
“Your neutral economic science investments
display our true ecological incubator, and not, laboratory vestments.”
Universe’s comprehensive co-gravitating love
emerges now
enthymematic photosynthetic evolutionary compassion,
co-arising co-passion,
eco-consciousness
of Ego’s quintessentially ubiquitous
bicamerally balancing
RNA-syntaxed
sensory timelessness within metaphysicality.
“My children co-redeem.
PassionYang, child for deductively reducing suffering,
PeaceYinYin, instinctive child of kindness,
content
kinship
content-full
mindful,
together, twins of bipolar contention,
dipolar contentment.”
Redeemers,
unlike those returning wealth for health value,
receive a healthy/therapeutic advance
for services to be rendered later,
like paying one’s rent on the first of each day,
and month,
then redeeming that gifting-it-forward investment.
Redemption,
unlike a coincidental exchange,
co-arises a return
for a WinWin pay-it-forward investment.
Yang brings forth political power
for Yin’s ecological economic optimization flow,
as
Yin brings forth full EarthRights logical double-binding co-redemptive flow,
for Yang’s more inclusive political form of wealth: eco-therapeutic health.
Co-passionate peace
dipolar bicamerally harmonizing
with Earth’s full octave fractal form and function,
eternally regenerates
Fr. Time’s spatially econtented informational telus-dance
teleodance of co-intelligence
gazing through 4 equidimensional eco-consciousness seasons.
Gaia and Fr. Time’s permacultural affair
looms their co-redemptive weave
throughout TransMillennial PolyCultural Power.
Note: Provoked by an internal dialogue with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 183 (SelectBooks, 2011): “When you literally begin to feel the telos, or [Yang-in and Yin-ex] directionality, of the entire process moving in and through your own nervous system, that is when you directly experience that movement as a [4-dimensional spacetime] vertical impulse in your own [eco]consciousness. You see that where we are headed is never static or predetermined [nor diastatically redetermined]. You awaken to what I sometimes call the ‘radical indeterminacy’ of the [timeless NOW eco-echo] life-process itself. As conditioned and mechanical as much of it might seem, the fact is that in every moment there is the possibility for [organically emergent] novelty. In every moment there is the potential for something new [revolving from something old]. In every moment, there is room for [evolutionary] emergence. That’s the miracle of [positive] evolution [as interior-landscaped, synergetic integrative, unitarian, Beloved revolution with universal outcome of bicameral-balanced eco-consciousness].” Some readers may see my Buckminster Fuller influence in comprehending positively dynamic evolution as synergetic (special case-subset) and love (metaphysical universal-Group Theory of co-arising zero-bilateral-elliptics).
New Evolving
Nuancing Andrew Cohen
“If we are interested in learning how to engage with consciousness
at higher and higher levels,
to consciously facilitate its evolution within us
and between us,
we need to look more closely
at the extraordinary phenomenon of [nondual co-arising] emergence
in matter,
in biological life,
[in economic life,
and in ecological systems,]
and most importantly,
at the level of [eco]consciousness.
We need to cultivate our capacity to visualize [healthy evolution]
and to emotionally connect
with what it would mean
for [positive] emergence to occur within our own interiors [landscapes,
co-dominant dipolar Left-Right bicameral Yang-Yin balance
transactions meeting RNA/DNA’s balance of healthy syntax
regenerative standards],
within our subjective [exterior landscape]
and intersubjective [eco-logical discernment
of normative relationships for cooperative confluence,
contentment, happiness, Positive Psychology and Permaculture]
experience [emerging from Basic Attendance].”
We hear and translate in the paradigms of prior formation
to speak and ecologically transpose a shared paradigm of reformation.
Note: Andrew Cohen quote from “Evolutionary Enlightenment: A New Path to Spiritual Awakening” (which strikes me as a benign oxymoron–new paths are the exception to the slow evolutionary norm), p. 182, SelectBooks. my commentary, additions, and format changes are intended to cooperatively nuance Cohen’s excellent and important work, to recommend him to you, not to discredit in any way , even if it happens to lead toward a new revolutionary enlightenment of eco-consciousness…
Wild Fire Management
I suspect you are right, that we get confused about the messages Earth gives us about what is optimally and sustainably healthy and inclusive of full diversity, including full-diversity of our anthro-centric neural systems, and degrees and oscillating waves of comparative mind-body health v. pathology.
When we measure the health of our political and economic forest, it would seem confusing and misguided to compare lifespans of the average organism within one forest to those of another, and thereby determine anything germane to comparative diverse “health-robustness” optimization of inter-species cooperative relationships . Although it might be interesting to compare the lifespans of the median organism–but maybe that’s what you meant, because the outcome measures are of trees, which should be about right in terms of the comparative internal diversity of Earth systems, but would be entirely wrong with regard to average lifespan of the entire incarnate biosystem within an ecosystem. We are essentially measuring the robustness of our temporal-Elders with median levels of regenetic-diversity balance in their endosymbiotic information processing and embryonic storage systems.
I think in Permaculture Design we learned that the old dead trees are best cut down and burned for fuel to heat our homes, allowing more room for a nearby medium tree to flourish, grow more robust, or perhaps even two or three trees to share this newly accessible ring of photosynthetic fuel.
What the forest seems to be saying to our “burn management” school of forest management, is to include age diversity in our measure of biosystemic diversity as a positive, and to assess each individual gift of the forest for its highest and best use, rather than trying to micromanage from on high. Facilitating trees of all ages and digestive-breathing diversity of interrelationships is complex, requires considerable listening and discernment, and sitting together, showing up and showing to each other what we need to survive together.
The real measure of robust sustainable health is probably universally inclusive and unitarian-intended diversely welcoming, inviting political/economic environments. With trees and meditators and therapists we call this Basic Attendance, setting aside nutrient/neural-assumptions of cognitive/affective dissonance/pathology.
I suspect that mental health is mind health, and I suspect that our “mind” is not rationally reduced to a synonym for “brain” or even “head.” I further suspect that the combination of economic ecological health and political-private relational anthro-centric health are, for each of us, and for all of us. as cooperative co-mentors of health (because that’s what DNA is positively designed to do, that is DNA/RNA’s vocation, if you will, regeneratively sustainable health), the real-time currency of optimized Continuous Quality Improvement currently emerges, co-arises, as cooperative healthy-wealth care and perpetuation toward future healthy regenerators of all species.
Father Time’s Surprising Taoist Polintimations
Tell me,
Father Time,
if you would share this space
it would mean everything to me
to us, so kind,
which forms of integrative diversity
incarnate your highest priority,
most comprehensive,
social-political-economic-cultural issues:
1. Domestic economy flat-line trends,
2. International peace intent and praxis,
3. Universally perpetually optimizing CQI health care
practices and standards of outcome-production value,
4. Eco-centric and -logical regenerative revelation
in response to climatic, yet chronic, changes,
unbalanced monoculturating times,
evolutionary paradigmatic
as polydigital-language trending
symbiotic evolution?
Yes!
timelessly offered lifeskills Master Time.
Trying again:
In the unlikely event
that you have the capacity
to give a straight answer
to an eco-political question,
theoretically far afield from your more temporal concerns,
Which of these four options best fits
your crystal-ball signs of cultural impact,
empowerment,
hunger,
critical climatic co-responsiveness
should Quinnipiac College survey
synergetic trends
across most likely voters
in our next national election?
Oh, so glad you finally said so.
Let’s see…
Number One is too sad and hopeless
at either national or international levels,
but maybe if we interpreted “domestic”
as ‘familial”
and/or ‘local”
or even
“genetically tribal exegetical branches
and root systems of eco-enriching
in-co-arising-formination.”
it’s against our real time language rules
to make up language that does not meet
exe-culturating standards.
I would respond,
but I hardly know where to begin
reiterating the total number of double-negative
standards within your un-natural logos.
This has always been a problem for me,
knowing where to begin,
to end,
to continue our story.
Anyway,
Number Two glares too starry-eyed
for prickly realists,
academics,
attorneys and pyramid-structured financial insurance agents,
for struggling real property commodifiers
and landlords, and ladies, of Earth’s Commons.
Number Three is too “liberal-Clinton” associated,
in the U.S.,
which is one of the few places
on Earth
where health-assurance continues to be a debated political and economic issue,
rather than an Earth Health Rights
environmentally inclusive
ecological imperative
to respond to global critically screeching
wilting, extinguishing, refuge-seeking demands.
Number Four speaks most clearly
to our stormy TransMillennial emergence generation,
syncing health as following eco-centric polycultural network optimization trends
of YangForm with YinYinFunction.
So, for young adults
through infants
of all currently incarnating
and co-evolving species,
I suggest Number Four,
to optimize culturally transformative healthy wealth
clout–
both effective health outcomes
evinced through Best Permacultural Practice research,
deductive-empowered,
and
anthro-epic mythic-rooted definition
for Beloved Climaxing Unto Near Diastatic,
Eco-Centric Community,
with concomitant Positive Psychology,
communication reiterating-regenerating
co-arising trends
for and from public/private discernment,
reductive harmony meets inductive prediction.
Internal,
like external,
climatic change
continues to forewarn
we are over-armed with mutually intended ballistics
while under-anchored
with mutually co-arising ballastic in-formation;
organic Earth’s co-intelligent red sky
points both dusk and dawn
of this co-operating local/global economic network.
It is like pulling wisdom teeth
without appropriately timed
and functional anesthetics
to follow your run-on temporal syntax.
Father Time,
your words are too dense
for normal neural travel.
If you were consulting a potential political policy
to empower globally inclusive economic incubation,
which of the following four options
is your strategic choice
for mentoring Earth’s residents
as faithfully
and lovingly
and effectively
and regeneratively
as possible
through our internal
and external climatic need
for positive healthy enculturating revolution,
designed to logistically deliver
sustainable health outcomes
through life’s projected eternity
on planet Earth:
1 Eco-normic thermodynamic political balance?
2. Increasing healthy multisystemic ecotherapeutic relationships
between bio- and eco-systems?
3. Achieving an exegetically accepted
eco-logical polycultured metaparadigm
of analogic-steering
Fullerian Midway Tipping Points
as permacultural Yang/Yin
co-operative harmonic wu-wei discernment
for eco-climaxing regenerative outcomes,
4. (0)-square-root sprouting
our metaphysical spacetime eco-consciousness
on, in, of, by, through
bicameral 4-prime fractal
regenerate RNA-rooted
co-arising intelligence?
Cultural history might suggest
reiterating prior cycles of spiral-octave cultural evolution:
Number One gifts our nondual future
with TransParent NegErgodic
Co-Gravitational Cosmology,
giving birth to RNA
as Host of bilateral Time’s awareness
(that’s my familial line).
Number Two erupts RNA
eventually spawning Left-brain ego-dominant
deductive-languaged DNA’s
lexicon of Yang/Yin double-fractal
Zero-Centric octave sets of frequency,
placeholders of confluently exegetical
positive/negative synaptically reiterative
transgenerational memory.
Number Three barters co-operative political relationships
with co-arising economic optimization,
Us-Them [P=N(NP)]
Win-Win Gaming Tree
on WWW’s Earth-as-Universe
balanced electromagnetic
binary-bi-nomial form and function
unitarian languaged mainframing
redundant information discernment systems.
Number Four yet emerges a Positive-C
(or “e” or “P”)
evo-logical language
balancing Time’s timeless
Right-brain love
of symmetric pattern
and fractal-holonic rhythm frequencies
double-boundaried, self-justifying implicate order
of negentropic dia-syntax,
bi-cytosine as Not(Not-Uracil)
uniting +U/(+/-)C-fractal
defining SpaceTime’s 4-prime bi-equivalency,
sustaining enculturation’s cooperative economics
with co-arising
Win-Win
political=power
primal Tao (temporally bilateral and dipolar) co-relationship.
Polycultural Party Invitation
First,
and hopefully last,
organizational meeting of the Polycultural Party
tonight
in our conjoined Meeting Room,
between your bicameral eyes.
If you
work or live in a cooperative,
would like to live or work in a more cooperative environment,
If you
garden or farm, or just feed, with organic preference,
would like to live in a more nutritious environment,
If you
write or dance or sing,
or some other variety of artistic expression,
or your mother calls you “artistic”
because she just doesn’t know what else to say,
or you would like to live more artistically,
gracefully,
within beauty of Self-Other creativity,
If you
are New Age spiritual
but feel old age natural,
then you are already an uncertified member
of our Polycultural Party.
Let’s continue certifying each other,
speak and listen
about how to be
and become
this Party,
more cooperatively organized,
more organic.
Note:
Your space and mine: co-operating.
Your time with mine: co-arising ec(o)-science-consciousness.
Memes of Dreams in Paradigm
He said
Permaculture Design and Naturally Reconstructive Development
applies Regenerative Evolutionary ConScience.
Well! she promulgated
Evolutionary Science
applies Positive Teleological Faith,
and Love,
on good days.
Not to be undone,
he responded
good Evolutionary Science days
and nights, perhaps,
apply Revolutionary Systematic Theology
for co-arising
benign
polypathic
parasites!
Hah, that was a good day one!
she more cooperatively replies,
Polypathic parasites
apply natural systemic development
to spiritual systemic co-arising evolutions
to evolve co-intelligent regenesis
of spiritual development
with eco-natural therapies.
Hmmm, I’ll have to think about that.
he thinks to understand,
Polycultural polypaths
polymorph eco-normative paradigms
of metaphysics
by deeply comprehending
ecological systems
of nature’s (less-meta) physics.
Well done!
she warmly enthymemes,
Polypathic translators
of 4-fractal seasonal syntax
uncover analogical laws and meanings and value
by recovering ecological functions and purpose
and co-arising frequencies
of bicameral consciousness.
He began,
Breathe in Left deductive
to exhale Right seduction,
love as beauty functions,
life as function reforms
most holy-healthy beauty,
balancing 4-prime polynomial harmonic octave,
universal-left loves unitarian-right,
and vice-versa.
She ended,
Co-arise full-functional content
within contentment
conjoining contentious dissonance
through timeless eternity
of Time’s positronic space pace.
He reiterated
as she began iterating his begin,
Permaculture Design and Naturally Repurposing Development
applies TransParentive
ReGenerative
Evolutive-Revoluting ConScience.
And so they and we continue,
through endless loops
of soupy regenetic issues
racing toward confluent
resonant
resolution.
gdill52 