Uncategorized

Dr. Fuller’s Hot Mess

Let’s start with one shared understanding:
life is a more dynamically relational synonym for “nature”.

So when we ask,
What is the purpose of life?
we are also asking,
What is nature’s purpose?
which sounds similar to asking if evolution is teleological.

What if we collectively imagined that life
is to “regenerative enlightenment”
as death is to “degenerative deduction”?

If life is the praxis of love’s synergetic intent,
and death is the oppositional purgation of ego-deduction,
perhaps dying is an entropic boundary
balanced between beloved life and negentropic
non-ergodic
not-ionic
eternally harmonic eco-syntaxed time.

Ionic double-binding balancing boundary issues of nature
develop iconic boundary issues of life’s enculturation,
like racial and gender and economic and ecological entitlements and enslavements,
monopolistic possessiveness and neglectful dispossession of relationship,
over-attachment to left-hemispheric ego identity
as over-detachment from right-hemispheric eco-ionic devolution,
domination of Left-ego as undervaluing of Earth’s Universalist Natural Rights
for balancing life’s integrative potential with death to ego-dominance.

Entropy as cognitive dissonance boundary space
and ergodic eco-holonic economy of tipping point rudder dynamics,
the “camouflage” of Taoism,
the double-bonding ambiguity of time’s always-present function,
the TrimTab path toward slowly adjusting time’s cultural rudder
toward regeneratively co-redemptive life
as comprehensive consciousness.

Freedom from fear of ego-death
revolves to face freedom to love
eco-integrative,
synergetic,
regeneratively natural life.

What we have is a failure to communicate,
a deductive-dominant ego-governed economic culture,
what we want is a co-redemptive
deduct-ego WITH induct-eco
bicameral meta-physicality of nature and life
AND
binomial physicality of nature’s temporal folding WITH unfolding
eternally balancing moment of Time
as comprehensive consciousness,
universal intelligence,
uni-versed in-telling narrative of in-formating spacetime.

Our eco-culturally balanced Commons underlying spacetime’s relativity
is time’s primally bilateral (0)-sum omnipresent
ubiquitous
co-incidental
collateral integrity.

If a deductive
extractive
possessively dominant economic monoculture
is the opposite of a redemptive
intuitive
dispossessive eco-normic polyculture,
then a balancing co-redemptive boundary of cognitive dissonance
heuristically challenges contentiousness
mendacity
hypocrisy
lack of balanced left-ego with right-eco-prehensive consciousness,
dissonance within our conscientific revolutionary learning space.

Deduction divides and separates values
redeemed through subsequent correlation and re-integration.

The opposite of synergy and love
is fear and anger about ex-formation’s undervalued
understoried
camouflaged negentropic root source,
reversing time’s disforming strings of syntax
back and forth toward Alpha’s Dark Vortex of (0)Mega Vertex.

Time’s double-binding syntax evolves toward recreative spatial stimuli
as positively balanced language evolves toward decompositional response.

RNA’s 4-dimensional syntax evolved DNA’s regenerative enculturation
as language struggles to comprehend binomial-fractal double-bound DNA syntax
as comprehensively regenerative consciousness
of this 3-space and 1-primetime equi-valent (0) centric uni-versed string
of in-formating theorem.

If Polynomial “Real-Time” Information
were not equivalent to Not-Not Binomial Exformation,
then electromagnetic balance would no longer be +radiant OVER (-,-)mutually gravitational energy waves,
thermodynamic balance would no longer be synergy OVER negentropy
in an ionically regenerative open universal system,
rather than the timelessness of entropic closed-universal chaos,
the power of cooperative relationships would no longer resolve
the disempowerment of competitive domination,
the economy of cooperative synergetics
would no longer balance time’s eco-redemptive presence.

If the purpose of life
is the meaning of nature’s evolution
toward harmonic freedom between ego- and eco-enculturing consciousness,
then unbalanced fear and anger about death and dying
will continue to distort our economics,
health policies and procedures,
vocational and residential formation,
ecological balance,
and regenetic harmonious integrity
as Earth’s polyculturally diastatic contentment,
peace with co-passioned
co-operating
transpeciating correlational justice,
Beloved Climax Community.

Standard
Uncategorized

Dr. Time’s Dipolar Rant

What’s up?
Thanks for this second interview,
old man.

You are either blind or confused,
but probably both.

Well, thanks,
and I appreciate you as well.
Now, I understand you want to talk about human consciousness.

We comprehend your language as limiting human consciousness.

Now would that be the royal “we”
or are you assuming something about me
or the entire human race?

Yes, although be careful not to confuse royalty with governance.
Royalty is best democratized for universal
and global
and individual self-governance.
This is the subject of considerable ancient poetry
and wisdom.

OK, well,
how about a wide open question
and then you can just say whatever it is you
or we
want to say about human consciousness?

Was that your wide open question
or am I still waiting for it?

Apparently you are still waiting
because you are continuing to respond to my questions
with questions.

Yes, that’s what I wanted to say about human consciousness.
So, any other questions for me today?

I don’t know how I got myself involved with you again.
You are the most ornery pedantic old fart I have ever met.

I resemble that remark
but it is not what I understand as an “open question.”

What would you like to say about consciousness?

Thank you.
That reminds me of the grand opening of Book 1:
The Character of Tao,
entitled “On The Absolute Tao.”
Let me try a post-millennial transposition
of Laotse’s famous treatise:

Book 1: The Coincidentally DiPolar Character of Time
1. On Absolute Time

The Time that can be spoken
Is not comprehensive time;
The Languages that can be given
Are not fully Polynomial-Real
resonate
resolved Information,
or understanding.

Not-Not Binomiality is the origin of “Universe” and “Earth”;
Language-Logos-Left hemisphere
proposes to the Right-hemispheric Eco-Mother
of Earth’s Universal Solar-Fueled System.
Left speaks ego’s anthrocentric
to Right’s mute eco-centric binomially balanced syntax.

Therefore:
Oftentimes, humans purge themselves of ego’s fear-of-death passion
In order to comprehend Life’s Original Intent;
Oftentimes, Universal Time’s comprehensive consciousness regards human passion,
To rediscover its bilaterally eternal flowing form
from past into this present toward future’s past.

This binomial–yin’s secret future time
with yang’s manifest past time–
is one naturally equivalent bilaterally coincidental cycle;
Yin-Future and Yang-Past are given different names
When human language explains their bilateral manifestation
in the present
as polynomially binomial
“not not yet”
and
“not not now”.

Future “not not yet” with Past Polynomial-Yang empowered Information
we language through Present’s comprehensive consciousness,
Logos-Mythos ReConnection
ReCreation
PermaCultural ReGeneration:
Stretching across Future’s Omega Point
down and into Deeper Ecology
Is the Risk and Opportunity Paradox
of Ego’s optimizing Life within Eco’s Balancing ReBirthing Death.

Wow, that sounds really deep Dr. Time
but some of us are really busy trying to get through our day
so if you’re done
I’ll submit this
but don’t expect too much by way of positive outcome
cause that was really out there in the effectiveness department.

You sound disappointed.

Let’s just agree that comprehensive consciousness
seems to lack sufficient informational articulation
to change how I feel about you,
for example.

I suppose that’s why we call it “comprehensive.”
So, let’s try redirecting fear about future deaths
and anger about past deaths
by including both ourselves and our environment
discovering what anger at,
fear about,
oneself can teach
our present consciousness.

What does your present conscience show you
about your justified anger at others,
past events,
society,
significant others;
what does fear about others,
and your future,
teach you about love and kindness
needed for yourself AND
these others,
together,
as a coincidentally correlated relationship through time?

When future-fear and past-anger say
“I don’t have time for you.”
future-love and past-kindness coincidentally say
“I regret not having enough time for us.”

When past-anger says
“I don’t have enough time for me.”
future-love and past-kindness also say
“I regret not having enough time for me
to be with eco-us,
universal-us,
governance-us,
to invest in more comprehensive consciousness,
universal intelligence,
to “sit with the world,”
to re-create,
to co-create,
to co-incidate,
to Right-eco-recenter my Left-ego-identity.”

When love and kindness say
“I have time for you”
future-fear and past-anger are also saying,
“I regret not having enough time for egocentrism.”
but,
future-love and past-kindness only speak within languaged consciousness
when present-tensing time is consciously dominant,
just as future-fear and past-anger only speak
with future and past tense timing dominance.

Anger about past relationships
transactional events within coincidental time,
is also fear about replication within future’s coincidental space
of present-tense comprehensive consciousness.

I’m feeling dizzy and light-headed.

You are dizzy and light-headed.

I just said that.

Binomially eternal time recycles
reiterates
religioning revolutionary
and enlightening intuitive dipolar headed,
as ego turns to fly home to Right-brain centric embrace
bilateral time regains this human race’s natural pace.

Too many words.

That’s OK.
His royal commissioner accused Mozart of too many notes.
Both history and culture had their timely response.
Mozart still sings and dances
because he did not listen to repressive governance messages.

Too many notes, I’ll never get this submitted in time.

Well, time doesn’t wait,
but it doesn’t leave any faster than it arrives.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Cooperative Discernment

Discerning one's right of conscience
forms comprehensive consciousness.

Or so I hope,
recognizing self-governing justice requires trust
in each eternal moment's conscience,
rooted back in DNA's time
anchored in universal consciousness,
intelligence,
awareness,
understanding,
comprehensively conscious is
as conscience does;
remembering, too, democracy requires trust
in each individual's conscience
rooted in something more than ego consciousness.

Self-governance,
decision making,
our economic-logical planning and prioritizing,
cannot merely protect human rights
without more inclusively protecting Earth Rights,
any more or less than human nature optimizes
nature's self-reflective memory capacity.
A human rights frame without an Earth Rights EcoCenter
misses the balancing right of conscience
informed by truly universal consciousness.
Golden Rules advocate co-operation with all "Others,"
no exceptions for natural system Elders
bilaterally intelligent trees and flowing rivers,
surfing oceans and coincidental gravity,
lunar and solar fueled systems,
progenitors of RNA's regenerative intelligence
of consciousness.

Cooperative governance is our informed footprint,
not the power of voting with our feet,
but flowing through this same direction,
erection of mutual consciousness.
Co-passion shapes our prints of future's self-sustaining peace.

Nature's footprint in yin's time,
printed foot of co-prehension,
yang-spacious,
efficacious conscience,
we pray for comprehension of views not shared,
languages not spoken,
functions not yet understood,
frequencies barely heard.

These views not shared
are also not yet shared,
not yet heard,
not yet listened to,
not yet understood,
not yet co-prehended.

We thank for comprehension of views
co-operatively shared.
We grace with co-prehension of nutrients
cooperatively shared,
co-science.

Noticing Earth Rights of conscience
revolutions universally inclusive 
comprehensive consciousness,
collatorally valued,
coincidental,
eco-science of ego-governance:

Eco begat ego
as
concave primordial double-boundaried time begat convex space,
as
yin-yin bilateral reverse enfolding omnipresence
begat yang's empowering omnipotence,
as
polypathic unitarian binomial synergy 
begat this polycultural-polynomial universe
of nutritional ecosystemic, 
DNA/RNA syntaxed,
information regenerative string of optimization conscience values,
for maintaining well-primed 
self-perpetuating 
governance.

Discerning Earth's eco-science
informs universal consciousness.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Time’s Eternal Consciousness

Time’s natural spaces,
a universe of footprints in remembered places.

Need is a kick in the ass and head.
Dissonance is afterflow,
undertow,
crashing cart with runaway horsepower.

Want is a binomial step into time,
co-operatively left-producing and right-consuming
memory footprints on the beach of time,
some more resonant and resolved
before erasing surf re-emerges,
and some less formed before washing into history’s cultural flow
of confluent wild consciousness.

Time bilaterally surfs
sands of positive place in negative space,
resolving comprehensive consciousness.

Footprints in the sands of time
regenerate decomposing memory
within nature’s wild chaos of flowing rhyme.

As we have no time without space
we experience no yin without yang
we coincidate no perfect vacuum
no perfect bad,
no perfect good
save well-timed balance between these appositionals,
except our potential for comprehensive harmonious consciousness
in mind with heart
and informing and exforming lungs
fueled by nature’s DNA intelligence.

Our shortages of universal intelligent time,
our misconceptions of potentially balancing spacetime consciousness
lead to suicidal
patricidal
fratridical
matridical
tidal footprints into quicksand’s chaos,
revolving karmic grace
for tomorrow’s regenerating beach
awaiting more transgenerationally resonant feet
and hands,
hearts and minds
surfing seasoned time
with permacultural wisdom.

Time flows and folds frequent nature’s voice
for each to hear with dissonant contentious noise
or listen in key of confluent contenting choice.

Time’s permacultural space,
universal footprints in memory’s conscious place.

Standard
Uncategorized

Miraculous Powers of Hypocrisy

I was listening to Cornell West,
who described our catastrophic tolerance of disvalues for others,
situations we would never tolerate for ourselves,
disvalues like homelessness and hunger,
but also like random violence,
abuse and neglect,
lack of caring,
as a “conspiracy” of a dominating, oppressive, and competitive culture.

Conspiracy theories make me nervous about the theorist,
but West reassured us that he shares this concern,
yet even with all that concern taken into account,
perhaps this is a conspiracy
in the same sense that cultural and climate evolutions
always appear, in hindsight,
as if genius inspired,
intelligently planned
and spontaneously networked
a magically coincidental outcome.
Positive sometimes,
and sometimes more about this mystery
of tolerating oppressive and suppressive disvalues for others,
with apparent equanimity,
unaware of any cognitive dissonance,
without active antipathy,
or even passive empathy,
the total absence of compassion,
lack of mindfulness,
lack of consciousness;
unconsciousness.

Our own hypocrisy of self v. other values v. tolerable disvalues
are hypnotic conspiracies?
Magical miracles?

Yet, conspiracy or not,
if self-contentment is possible
while hypocritically accepting intolerable losses and suffering,
abuse and neglect, for other:
species,
Earth-plus-atmosphere ecosystem,
nations,
cultures,
neighborhoods,
even other family members,
then we sometimes would choose words like
irrational,
rabid,
irresponsible,
lack of appropriate accountability,
lack of capacity for empathy or bonding,
lack of awareness, consciousness,
hateful,
stupid,
mental disease,
sociopathology,
ecopathology,
a hypocritical living death cuts by a thousand ego-feathered knives.

We work this magically competitive hypocrisy with each other,
on each other,
against each other,
and sometimes with each other–
we call that humor.

I do not feel possessed
when my internal ecological voice
tells me that my monocultural competitive economic environment
is over-invested in undervaluing significant dimensions
of who we naturally and cooperatively (permaculturally) are,
our care-giving and loving,
our tenderness and justice-seeking,
our tendency to side with the underdog and the understory,
our endless fascination with root systems and nutritious blossoms,
seasonal development patterns and the weather,
birdsong and surf sounds,
regular breathing and heart-beat rhythms,
blood flow nutritional capacities,
the consumption and production of nutrients
within any paradigm that might come to mind.

I get it that I live in a culture educating ourselves,
about Darwin’s “evolution is the survival of the fittest cooperative relationships”
by simply omitting the last two words;
cultural hypocrisy miraculously conspired through our sins of omission,
more salient than our grace of cooperative inclusion,
because of collective cognitive dissonance
where we need collective cognitive confluence.

Perhaps a more resonant resolution of consciousness
calls us to slow down and decompose our analysis of deviance
as sometimes negative and sometimes positive
but always some of both.

I struggle to hold a heuristic safe-space for positive deviance.
My cognitive dissonance radar
learns to perceive dissonance itself as having two faces.
In this way
I begin to claim my positive deviant place
in our shared orthodoxy of truth and goodness,
beauty and diverse polycultural integrity,
in our “unitarianism” our synergy (B. Fuller),
our love.
If I am challenged to include you in this shared orthodoxy
(of truth and goodness and beauty and justice, etc.–the “positive values”)
then my sense of ecosystemic balance
is dissonant enough to exclude you
from your rightful place in our radically cooperative eco-space.

I tend to over-react to your negative deviance,
all that nastiness, really?!
because of our culturally collective cognitive dissonance
about your coincidental positive deviance,
OK, so you are loyal to a fault and a good cook,
and the clothes actually do smell and feel better when you do the laundry,
although it is the environmental expense that we actually disagree about,
whether it is significant to our collective future,
or not,
or something in between,
some place that we might actually find
and consensually agree about
and then go on to those other kinds of sensuality,
but I think I have side-railed here.

Perhaps we enjoy solidarity in rooting for the underdog
in empathizing with those who appear
with a magical potential of a positive deviant outcome.
We so hope the underdog might win this round
in part
because we thereby retain a ray of hope
that we too may someday win
with all our undervalued, unsung, underdogged traits,
cooperative preferences,
nurturing instincts,
suffering and struggling with
my over-dog egocentric cultural landscapes,
my environment,
my internally encultured ego (Left-brained) consciousness.

I always cast my ego in the role of underdog,
just as my Right brain casts our permaculturally cooperative eco-consciousness
in the role of Superdog.

This internally chaotic conspiracy of self-doubt
about ego’s capacity to live fully,
integrally,
creatively,
honestly,
compassionately,
with appropriate integrity of self-disclosure,
without the embarrassment of closeted hypocrisy,
dropping our considerable weapons of mutual immunity
and cognitive dissonance,
is also the boundary face of rediscovering our Right-brain’s ecocenter,
our Beloved non-verbal Communication center,
comprehensively conscious,
resonant and resolved,
optimized and polypathically densely nutritious,
only through bicamerally synergetic confluence,
active peace,
love,
integrity of shared meaning and purpose
to the very core of our mutually messianic
mutually mentoring
co-redemptive
ego-and-eco balanced chi-soul.

Interior Landscaped Ego (left)
and Cooperative Exterior Landscaped EcoEarth (right-elder)
DNA/RNA fueled and functional frequencies
coincidentally confluate,
stir
decompose
to regenerate.

Standard
Uncategorized

Time’s TransParent River

There is nothing weaker than water
But none is superior to it in overcoming the hard,
For which there is no substitute.
(Laotse, “Nothing Weaker Than Water”, Lin Yutang, trans.)

That weakness of mind and body overcomes strength
And unitarian co-gentleness overcomes universalist rigidity,
No Yang does not know;
No yin can put into practice.

Therefore the Sage Says:
“Who receives unto self the MLK calumny of the world
Is the preserver of an equilibrious state.
Who bears the dissonant sins of the world’s living systems
Is the resonantly full-conscious mentor within this NOW world moment.”

Straight words seem crookedly dissonant, distorted, unparadigmed.
Evolution’s Time seems revolutionary.
(Adapted from “Nothing Weaker Than Water”)

Prophecy’s weakness is lack of redemptive empowerment.

The strength of prophecy
for redemptive effectiveness
is its weakness
as culturally dissonant.
Too much dissonance is dismissed as insanity
or sainthood
or martyrdom
or suicide.

Too little dissonance is not co-prophetic
and therefore not redemptive.

This cutting edge
tipping wu-wei point of rationality
is the weakness of optimally ebbing and flowing water
as ecological synergy
as Positive Yang balancing Negentropic Yin-Yin
Win-Win
Double SpaceTime Binding Teleology.

When Yin-Water absorbs Earth,
then She becomes stagnant entropy,
chaos,
disorganized
dissonantly dismayed
unable to continue flowing,
flexing,
fluxing,
surfing.
A Universalist Yin EcoCenter
evolves as stagnant pond
what were dynamic rivers,
seasonally surfing oceans–
a Holding Space wherein Time stands relativistically
and 3-dimensionally,
still,
like a vacuum of interior landscaped atmosphere;
more likely to produce a horrific monoculture
of mold and mosquitoes
than motion
and revolutionary change.
For this we want Time’s river function,
swelling springs of Transmillennial comprehensive consciousness.

Western Business-As-Usual culture
understands love as “kindness.”
Coincidentally,
Eastern permacultural comprehensive consciousness of Time
as panentheistic and teleological “love”
evokes mutual, co-redemptive, namaste–
A Buberian mutually mentored I-Thou bow.

Love,
mutual gratitude of synergetic energy,
requires a Bucky Fuller dynamic balance
between freedom to comprehend and embrace
our eco-center in each eternal moment,
as subconscious freedom from awareness of only Ego,
our more limited Left-brain’s “small-self” center.

Kindness, and unkindness,
are gratefully, and rudely,
extended, not extended,
to ourselves as empathized “Other.”
These are ego-ionic actions
to teach us how to be more mutually generous
in each of our primal relationships
with Love’s ecological comprehension
of Time’s Yangish and Yinnish rebalancing ways.

What is fair,
within contentious issues,
is found where our mutually held eco-center points,
always wu-wei midway between
the most Yang-power value extreme
and the most Yin laissez-faire “both-and” inclusively unitarian absorbency.
Nature abhores a perfect vacuum of either Yang or Yin;
omnisciently insists on Left with Right languaged intelligence.

When we identify with a “downstream” yin position,
our underdog empathy extends to include
reaching toward increasingly marginalized and irrational
“Other” position of empathic identity.
Our eco-centric Right-brain starts from this position,
as a holonic reiteration of “Self’s” encultured history,
then flows economic and ecological “generosity”
of loving values
“upstream” toward our mutually mentored,
taught,
tautly experienced,
planted and rooted and trimmed and pulled, and encoded lexicon,
decomposed and empathized,
intuited Yang position,
looking for that tipping point boundary of the collective unconscious
wide enough to capture all synergetically oriented reiterators
racing issues through our surfing moments and lives.

Justice trickles up and out,
as well as down and in,
washing back and forth through fields of unconscious cognitive dissonance,
to emerge toward a consensus of collectively generous,
but not overly generous,
merciful,
inclusive coredeemer ecojustice.
An enculturation laundry,
but go easy on the yin-bleach.

If I lacked something of the “underdog,”
the “understory,”
the “criminal” and “crazy”
within my holonic human nature,
then my nature would be neither holonic nor human.
Yang’s “bad boy” universalist megalomania
and sociopathological ego-power
is a challenging competitive dimension
within our ego-centric,
anthropomorphic view
of evolution’s meaning;
while Yin’s ubiquitous “Other”-love as “Self,”
generosity to the extreme of unitarian self-exiting wishfulness,
is our more primal RNA holonic-cellular intelligence
of generosity’s ecological win-win scenario,
devoid of ego’s self-distinguishing,
and often dissonant,
and too loud,
and Left-brain dominant,
voice and language.

Kindness and unkindness are transactions between unequals.
Generosity and stinginess of empathy,
what eco-consciousness invites
as appropriately proportional response,
are transactions between mutual mentors
of gratitude, and lack thereof.

Differences between ego’s intended kindness
and eco’s well-practiced generosity
include a Taoist position that kindness and unkindness
are not found in nature,
although love,
as synergetic mutual gravity,
is the source of natural systems,
of bilateral life and time,
as opposed to the existence of…
well…
nothing; entropic unconsciousness.

Kindness suggests I am extending something to another
that this person has not earned,
does not rightfully and justly deserve
within the normal flow of time’s river.

Generosity is a mutually intended practice
of radical equanimity and empathy,
a grateful acceptance of our profound interdependence
of cause and effect,
stimulus and response.
Generosity is about absorbing and hopefully co-redeeming
our mutual assets and liabilities
to resolve an issue
whose outcome can be a mutual win
from a position of profoundly radical
coincidental/correlational
mutually mentored co-identity.
Trans-parentcy.

You have shown me who you are right now
so I may choose to respond
with who we could become right now
if we move from this position forward
within our positively synergetic, generous, practice
of mutual namaste.

There is nothing weaker than yin’s subconscious water
But none is superior to it in overcoming yang’s unconscious soul,

Standard
Uncategorized

PsychoTripic Theory of Everything

Consciousness is internally co-incidental.

Today I want to talk about possibilities
for permaculturally dynamic,
which are, by definition, natural systemic,
relationships,
correlations,
between Left-brain deductive consciousness,
Right-brain inductive subconsciousness,
and an entropic boundary between these two interior landscapes,
which we call unconsciousness.

The feasibility,
much less value,
of recognizing this phrase, “unconscious mind,”
as an oxymoron
may have optimally Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) implications
for polypathic potential to develop comprehensive consciousness
of both our Left-deductive cognitive confluence,
and our Right-intuitive cognitive dissonance as negentropic,
or negative, correlation.

But first a note about the “correlation” of information
as calculable datum.

Try, if you would be so kind,
to imagine that a positive correlation of information,
like the association of winter with cold,
and summer with warmth and maturation of plant and animal life,
is dynamically analogous to:

Correlation: Coincidental energy trends of association,
transaction,
action,
mutual giveness,
cooperation,
polycultural intention;
implied mutual attraction of any gravitational bilaterality.

And, these coincidental correlations can be positive or negative trending
across time
as experienced through bilateral consciousness.

But, when correlations of informing deductive consciousness are positive trending,
our Right-brain “sub”conscious awareness
of coincidental proportion
and function
responds to this same data set
of informating energy
with a “not-not” cognitive dissonance screen.

That is, when the Left brain sees opportunity
to invest in correlative information,
the Right brain decomposes risks of investing
where double-negative ecologic remainders are dissonant
with Left-brain’s languaged deductive resolution.

When our Left brains compare positive and negative correlations
from the past
with current experiential research data,
this means
our balancing Right brains coincidentally correlate
with double-bind subconscious memory loops,
using DNA lexicon,
fractally self-regenerative
permaculturally self-balancing,
seasonal,
and equi-proportionately feminist,
development syntax.

This coincidental correlation responds to Left-brain’s question
“What is a revolution of life?”
with
“What is a universal evolution of not-not death?”
Right-brain translates Left-brain’s “Closed System” lexicon
as “Open Thermodynamic Balanced System.”

Our conscious mind responds to cognitive dissonance
by dismissing current information
proposed by our receptive neural sensors
which may be what we call “unconscious mind”–
one that lacks optimally comprehensive consciousness
because of this unresolved,
disresonant,
exformative,
distorted information ergodic boundary
between Left and Right hemispheric balance.

Meanwhile, coincidentally,
Right brain intuitive awareness
seems to be how we have culturally marginalized,
disempowered,
oppressed and suppressed
permacultural cognitive confluent consciousness;
how Western and Male and Right-hand dominant cultures
disempowered our Yin-Yin,
Win-Win,
wu-wei,
tipping point,
TrimTab potential
by dismissing intuitional awareness to the merely “sub”conscious
netherworld of mythological icons
and over-active spiritual crystal-gazing.

As our correlative and coincidental consciousness
moves toward Right with Left balance,
harmonic 4-dimensional spacetime
as permaculturally comprehensive consciousness
unveils Right-brain’s
“Eternal Universally Open Moment”
understory
as poly-consciously
regeneratively
optimizing DNA lexicon’s potential information,
with enthymematic form
and positive OVER negative function
and flow and flux
“surfing;”
perhaps David Bohm’s “Implicate Order,”
but also Buckminster Fuller’s comprehensive systemic consciousness
of Explicate OVER Implicate
as (0) Core Vertex OVER Dark Hole Vortexial
Alpha through (0)Mega Point.

As comprehensive consciousness evolves,
permeating human nature’s future
deductive-inductive balancing potential,
this boundary term “unconscious mind”
will evaporate,
as we learn to see what was not conscious
as what is coincidentally,
correlationally,
dynamic as cognitive,
affective ergodic,
and only potentially effective “sub” conscious Right-brain awareness
of heuristic dissonance between what has impacted
one or more of our senses
and our double-binding memory of Elder experience.

Comprehensive consciousness compares to
a fully enlightened neural-cellular system,
a diastatic heart,
fully-encultured lungs,
as entropic unconscious chaotic exforming carnation
compares to dissonance within our disembodied dismay
and fear of death.

Freud’s tripartite decomposition of consciousness,
with Id as a disturbingly primal unconscious “self”
lurking behind Ego’s consciousness,
lording over the sometimes bitchy Syperego’s
poly-ionic subconscious mind,
might have appeared psycho-dynamically normative to Freud
because of his research and analysis focus
on people experiencing significant dipolar Left-Right dissonance.

Probably more helpful
on this journey toward permaculturally comprehensive consciousness
is to reconceptualize consciousness
as a Left-Right bicameral conversation
through DNA/RNA’s language roots,
where Positive Polynomial Information
tries to retain thermodynamic ionic
and ergodic balance
with Negative Not-Not Polynomial
double-bound Right-brain
fractal-octave root frequences
and functions of communication
and community
and economic
and ecological development;
which we also experience as evolution
toward regenerative CQI standards
for fully-balanced consciousness.

A correlative observation:
notice that positive teleological correlations,
which we think of as indicators of life’s evolutionary
and regeneratively omniscient trend
toward our hoped for future time
of beloved climaxing diversity,
follows a Right-Left cooperative balancing
economic investment profile,
by logically following a Win-Win Gaming strategy.

Left-brain dominant,
Business As Usual “consciousness”
over-estimates the empowerment value
of “dominator Win-Lose” competitive economic assumptions
as being normative
because of a Darwinian natural law of life’s survival.
Darwin himself most certainly did not share this Left-brain dominant comfort
with any “natural law” message
suggesting the way to optimize positive evolution
is rooted in a competitive Win OVER Loser
thrival of the deductive-only fittest.
First of all,
way too anthro-centric for Darwin’s taste.
Second,
this view was contrary to,
cognitively dissonant with,
his experience of Earth’s living
evolving nature
as rooted in the cooperative bilateral challenges
resolved reiteratively
through genetic conversations
between a local species
and that species’ local and global environment.

Buckminster Fuller’s “Universal Intelligence,”
like his hope for post-millennial comprehensive consciousness,
and like Darwin’s view of Earth’s systemic evolution,
is rooted not in the human brain,
or even the uniquely human natured neural system–
although the languaged expression of consciousness is so rooted.
Rather, intelligence,
or consciousness,
evolves from the root structure of DNA,
and, even more primally,
from each RNA self-regenerative living cell structure,
design,
and development protocol.
Our consciousness derives from our brains and neural systems,
yes,
but also our hearts,
our lungs, all of our organs
holding this Beloved Community
of eco-centric synergy
through joint venture investments
in this regeneratively cooperative,
and often challenging,
Alpha-(0)Mega Point journey
toward comprehensive eco-consciousness,
(0)-sum rooted
and harmonically balanced
with 4 equi-dimensional nature’s full-frequency
octave informed energetics.

Standard
Uncategorized

Eye Contact

What is love?
A sea of nonexistence
both tranquil and calamitous
where the mind
does not dare enter.
(Rumi, M. Mafi, “Day By Day”, p. 120, 2014, Hampton Roads)

What is timeless synergy?
Our sea of coexistence
both confluent and dissonant
where blind consciousness
seldom dares id-entify.

Aging time,
This house, not home, hums and strains pitchy tension,
Remnants of bleached but dingy historic laundry,
face cloths remember cherished warm skin,
dryer in winter’s discontent,
more needy of enduring compassion.

Staring through my mirror now,
I reach back into black glazed pupils
diastolically expanding through their memory archives,
four grandparents staring back
through this sagging reflected face,
each one looking through these same bicameral Black Hole
Home’s binomially eternal windows,
imagining forward for grandchildren’s sustainable future lives,
remembering backward through these four grandparents.

I know this visual DNA looking out and back
and through our mutually cooperative investment generations,
sometimes more dissonant,
sometimes less confluently mutual mentors,
bicamerolling partners,
but at least on occasion syncing their cooperative praxis,
or this interdependent coredeemer face could not stare back
through time.

Aging rapidly now,
back toward messianic mystic shamans.
Where were these DNA-drenched pupils
of mutual subsidiary bicameral learning
expanding and contracting,
causing hearts to race and calm,
breath to gasp and slowly subsidize
this atmosphere of longing to belong ago
again?

Were these wise mentors hopeful ancient mariners,
swimming through generations of salty tears,
wet fears and joys,
jumps and starts,
swelling farts
feeding trees to synthesize our polyculturing breath?
Listening for, noticing a new millennium,
era,
life,
perennial cycle,
season of organic permacultural development,
more permanently encultured
with fertile light and sounds
and Time’s regenerating rhythms of dancing songs and thumps,
surfs and silent advents.

Speaking,
perhaps these pupils speak of what they see reflecting
back through karma’s cumulative incarnations,
each grace of opportunity for mindfully inclusive redemption,
love as synergy,
dissonance as hate, violence, neglect, dismay, heartbreak,
unsustainable loss of life
to fly and swim together
or fall apart
back through plasma flows and folds,
regenerating
informating these deep learning pupils
looking, searching, noticing, decomposing,
seeding, growing, guarding, developing,
incubating, harvesting, winnowing nutrient compost
through ancient primal roots
of RNA’s meaning, regenerating purpose
to keep evolving forward through Time’s unfolding information
incarnation, as possible,
avoid revolving backward into meaningless
mindless dissonance,
competition,
dominator violence,
and decaying entropy.

Pre-historic now,
our pupils reflect darkly dense regenerative study,
decomposing wispy wet winds and whips of swimming eco-seas,
surfing pregnant prime love relationship
of right and left enculturation
remembering Yin greets Yang’s dominant deductive proposal
with mutually subsidizing solidarity,
cooperation,
investing in binomial future’s redemptive ecology.

Ancient bicameral ellipticals,
mutually mindful Yang with Yin
looking out and back,
and in and positively forward through Time’s ubiquitous consciousness.
Primal evolutionary ionic self-mirroring,
regenesis,
ever aging eternal moment
of dense strung solidarity
remembering,
recollecting,
reconnecting NOW
from past genetic heritage
through future’s evolving incarnation.

Timeless pupils of love’s synergy
surfing seasons of pre- and post-existential consciousness.

Now if I could remember where I left my glasses,
and my teeth…

Standard
Uncategorized

Post-Clinical Therapy

So why clinical psychology?
What does that mean, anyway?
What is non-clinical psychology?
Does it mean analytical psychology,
which might mean analogical?
Which would mean ecological?
Which is really just plain logical?

So is it logical psycho-logic,
and wouldn’t that be sort of redundant
because doesn’t psycho-logy mean psycho-logic
and dislogic
neural-rooted consciousness?

So maybe clinical psychology is neuro consciousness
and unconsciousness
and subconsciousness
psycho-logic?
Which might mean the psychologics of consciousness?

But, if this is a science
then the logic of a psychic paradigm
can be no better or worse,
I suppose,
than the rationality of the scientist?

So, does clinical psychology refer to a logical neuro-science
of consciousness?
And, if so, then why would anyone assume this could be systemically dissonant with ecological consciousness?
Why not ecological dynamics of our Interior Landscape?
Clinical psychology as deep ecology.

Standard
Uncategorized

When We Are In Charge

Evolution unfolds history
as economics forms cultural values.

Just as currency only carries values we supply
as a society of economists,
so my own paltry sums can only carry those values
I am willing to invest in.

Money does not grow out of some distant Orthodox investment value tree,
We invest our money,
like our time,
in our values, or disvalues.
Cash is our economic cart,
while our cultural values are our investment horsepower.

Our values are subjects of economic life,
as redemptive synergetic investments are objects,
objectives,
outcomes,
purposes,
meaningful as ecological life and time
and peace and justice as actively invested love.

Our “need” values are negatively synaptic–
lots of horsepower,
as our want values are positively aptic,
sustainable,
maintainable,
optimal composting economic norms
and natural law assumptions of synergetic ecologic,
like the stress of rapid spring growth
must separate winter’s decompositional gratitude
from summer’s regenerous amplitude.

We need to not be hated and hateful
marginalized or marginalizing others.
We need to be loved as lovers of all nature,
including humane nature.
We would like to not be neglected and ignored,
the subject of our own self-ridicule.
We would like to be met with gratitude
and trust
and non-violence
and willingness to invest in cooperative values.

We invest in ecological cooperation more gracefully
knowing our future time is already redeemed,
regenerative,
through our synergetic praxis,
cooperative self and other love
as gift-it-forward investments from Elder generations,
passing through our positive regenerative intent,
to redeem our future history of generations.

Ecojustice yang horsepower
races genetically bionic Eco-Logic’s YinYin Cart,
just as ecological values and disvalues
empower global Yang to drive
our binomial economic cart of wealth deposits and empoverishing loss
and health risk,
currency as energy flow and constipation,
and nutritional functions of co-redemptive compost.

Ecological karma predicts economic grace,
or not so much risk
and loss of face.
A regeneratively optimizing ecosystem
presupposes a redemptively cooperative economy.

A degenerative sub-optimizing eco-stressed culture,
ecological thoughtlessness,
lack of comprehensive consciousness,
grows mental and physical illness,
chronic cognitive dissonance,
inclusive affective autism,
flat-line economic entropy
with high risks of wilting
consumers and producers,
decomposers
and extinguishing richly effective pollinators.

It seems to me that ecological trends
predict an economic trickle up theory,
disempowerment and disinvestment
in synergetic systems,
beloved and climax community development,
will continue leading toward our demise,
until this unraveling ecosystem
reconnects balancing tipping points
and wu-wei principle
for reweaving ecojustice.

An EarthTribe platform of Earth Rights,
for Self as Earth-holonic sacred icon,
as for Other,
as for all Earth’s natural eco-justice logical future.

Standard