Today we begin with a quote from Charles Eisenstein
with commentary in brackets
informed by Bucky Fuller’s cooperative metaphysic
of Synergetic Steerage.

“We have a[n intuitied, autonomic systemic] need to stay in contact with people with whom we share emotional and economic ties. In past times, these people were usually close by. A hunter-gatherer or fourteenth-century Russian peasant would have had little use for a telephone. Telephones [and www] began to meet a need only when other developments in technology and culture spread human beings [even] farther apart and splintered extended families [and neighborhoods] and [national through] local communities [as sustainable ecosystems]. So the basic need they meet is not something new under the sun.” [Basic cooperative communication need has evolved to global cooperative scale because technology’s deductive path has evolved a co-arising economic/ecological imperative.]

p. 80, Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition, 2011, Evolver Editions, Berkeley, CA

What Plan B Fuller eco-comprehended
as an implied Universal First Principle of Positive Synergetic Balance:
all Primal Principles
must be universally informed,
comprehensive,
“cooperative” defined as ergodically and ionically regenerating full-fractal,
RNA-dynamically syntaxed,
to achieve integrative,
healthy,
Spaceship Earth cooperative wealth optimization,
as sustainability of positive life-trend energy,
form,
and revolutionary developmental design.

Economists and eco-nomists bilaterally recognize
production of newly commodifying need-systems
co-arises
with creation of consumptive/absorptive/nutritional evolution
of need v. want constellations and priorities.

The difference between a Plan A Competitive
Win-Lose assuming economist,
gamer,
strategist,
logician,
policy analyst,
weather forecaster,
and a Plan B Cooperative
Win-Win assuming eco-nomist,
gamer,
strategist and logician and linguist,
policy and planning co-analyst,
permacultural co-designer,
feminist eco-nomist,
sacred eco-logist,
weather forecaster,
is Left-Right dipolar balance as reverse correlated with cognitive dissonance,
deep-comprehension
of Win-Lose as suboptimizing health and wealth
compared to a double-negatively reiterating thermostat,
decompositional analysis trending,
reverse hierarchical tree,
of unfolding regenerative strings
including binary trend QBit 0=squared/fractal-centric time
of mutual subsidiarity positive-default comprehension
as Win-Win bicameral informational system’s
balancing ecological,
economic,
and permacultural uracil-yang/cytosine-yinyin
b-ionically deductive/inductive zeroistic design.

We can approach the further
related
question of optimizing Polynomial syntax and form and function
as equivalently and dipolar defined by -(-P),
binary RNA syntax
of analogical economic polynomial trend QBit
double/elliptical fractal rhythm and patterned balance.
We can approach this question
with fractally 0-squared digital information
as ecological trend analysis
with a dual hypothesis,
to see which is more productive
of a healthy and wealthy past,
present,
and future.

We could observe
rather summarily
that the proposition
“Polynomial Information
is non-equivalent to Not-Polynomial Information”
has been our scientific deductive and metric
analytically encultured eisegetical assumption,
leading to competitive irresolution
through our own default Win-Lose economics.
Here,
in this irrationally eternal place,
we cannot deductively explain
why some issues,
problems,
algorithms,
variables,
norms,
memes,
paradigms,
have resonantly resolvable solutions
and scientific revolutions
while others calculate their way through infinite time.

Which is which is rather like trying to separate Kuhnian primal revolutions
from more normatively diversifying-further-individuating-articulating
evolutions.

If, however,
we start with the heuristic assumption
that Polynomial spacetime universe =
nondually-transparenting N(NP),
where might this take us toward explaining
outstanding teleological,
economic,
ecological, and perhaps even cosmological
issues?

Cooperative Game Theory:
P-positive Win = (-,-) equivalent Win NP,
a positive draw,
anticipating an equally positive draw choice from nondual Other
is RNA-rooted naturally systemic,
with outcome to play both positively and cooperatively
as long as everyone chooses to play nice.

Group Binomial (0)-Soul Theory:
Explicate Convex Boundary +P = +(0)
Implicate (Bohm) Concave Double-Bound NP = -(-0).

And, so, to our deductively metric and commodifying friends
at Clay Math Institute,
at least the field of permacultural design
and all the cells of RNA heritage,
appear premised on a Zero-Binomial Assumption
that P-yangspace = N(NP)-yinyintime = +/-C ecosquared
as c-squared Universe equals e-squared Synergetic Balanced Integrity (Unitarian),
the balance of deductively formal light
with inductively flowing harmonic balance,
co-arising metaphysical form with intuitive eco-consciousness function.