Uncategorized

YangWin-YinWin Economics

She started our discussion of EgoWin-EcoLogicalWin
Eastern NonDual CoArising PoliticalEconomic Theory,
by reminding us that Deductive LeftBrain
has not always been WinLose competitive dominant;
there was a prior emerging moment in prehistory,
more of a herstory,
when WinWin cooperative EgoYang and EcoYin
were both LeftDeductive and RightInductive co-dominant,
when WinWin cooperation
knew life as happy and healthy and robustly bilaterally self-regenerative
and too often interrupted by competitive flee and fly and fight
Business As Unusually Oppositionally Defiant,
calling for active antipathy for physical survival
but normally WinWin cooperatively normed co-empathic trust
for nature/sacred-nurture health and wellbeing thrival.

But,
just as we were about to fall into another revolving trance,
she unexpectedly went off script:

So, here’s one of my growing climatic number of collective stupidities
that really pisses me off.
She said, but strangely without exclamation,
as if too nearly exhausted
to expend-expand further scarce positive purifying,
yet also creolizing, multiculturing, polypathing,
energy.

Here in this DisUniting,
formerly bicamerally functional, States,
we not only invest good taxpayer money and time
in Uniting Earth’s Nations and Species
for multiculturing Health and Climate WellBeing,
but we ironically host this WinWin ecopolitical hive of cooperative activity,
of positive polypathic becoming,
in the very heart of our Walled Street
financial industrial military invest in WinLose
rabidly-competitive
Anti-WellBeing Constitutional,
every royal-elitist WhiteBread Man for Himself
Empty (0) nihiistic secular UnderSoul
of PreMillennial Survivalist Evolutionary WinLose Pathology.

While, at the very moment in Earth’s climate-therapeutic history
we need to cooperate and groom and feed and nurture
these Uniting Nations and Species
of and for ReGenerative Health,
we elect that goddamned AntiChristian
patriarchal elitist LeftBrain denialist of RightBrain ecological feelings
for health and safety through DNA-RNA solidarity roots,
ecosystemic healthy nature LeftBrain-Win
making agapic nice with wealth nurture RightBrain-EcoWin,
whose only investment in the United Nations
is disinvestment from Global Health and WellBeing!

Now She was getting prerevolutionarily stirred up.

What the Hell kind of tragic-comedy is this
for Earth’s vast stage of emerging humane-democratic
multiculturing polypathic health history?

Why would our collective WinWin intelligence
toward optimizing Health and WellBeing Outcomes
settle for OldSchool WinLose survivalist competitor throwbacks
when we know their governance outcomes will always
ecologically and economically
and politically and socially
and psychologically suboptimize,
will incur risk more than health/wellbeing opportunity,
when WinWin ecopolitics optimizes healthwealth development
over degenerative risk of less future generations
to continue cooperating United Nations and Species?

We began nervously looking around our discussion circle,
avoiding Her too regenerative exclamatory direction,
hoping this was a merely rhetorical question,
some argument She was struggling with
within Her Ego/EcoSelves,
while we continued feeling like prey
who only knew how to co-arisingly pray.

In the brief ensuing silence
no one seemed surprised
when He twittered back,
You’re just a sore and sour WinWin Loser,
like YangMe.

Together we induced back,
We stand apart
Yang struggling against Yin
for all that is UnHoly and Ego/Eco Systemic Loss.

He had the last LeftBrain word,
but we still have our WinLeft-WinRight
alpha through omega cooperative-empathic feelings.

We have created Him
to regenerate WinWin HisElite-HerNonElite Uniting Nations
and CoOperative CoOwnership CoMentoring
Health and WellBeing Species.

He twittered back
i’m still not feeling you,
or even capable of hearing us as one extending resilient family
for Health and CoOperative WellBeing.

That seemed rather long
for a WinLose twitter.

Standard
Uncategorized

First Faces of Creative Conflict

Perhaps too redundantly,
and not quite octave-eloquently enough,
we have pictured Original Yang/Yin ReGenerative/DeGenerative CoArising Intent
as LeftBrain Patriarchal EgoDominant
with a preference for WinLose,
defined as Either-Or thinking
with fundamentalist vertical power hierarchical assumptions
that LeftElite will always remain conservatively On Top;
sort of Traditional MissionaryPosition Only,
by RightBrain’s way of matriarchal feeling.

AND, speaking of RightBrain as our inductive co-empathic Win/Win Flow
Matriarchal reverse bilateral double-bind notthis-notthat Both-And,
Elder Sacred Ecology Source,
rather like a WinWin Paradise
Great Archipelago Chain of Eden ReGenesis,
icon of Earth as WinWin creolizing Eco-Nest,
where archipelagic EcoSystems are regeneratively defined
as polypathic archetypes
for WinWin ecopolitical bicameral evolution
through revolution
through reweaving evolution cycles of perpetual democratic multicultural becoming
nutritionally evermore slow growth Health
and WellBeing
through EcoLogical CommunityEconomic Development;
both EliteLeft Dominant
and Not(NotElite)Right Democratic-Multiculturing HealthWealth.

But, believe WinWin sacred, or believe WinLose secular, evolutionary theory,
this may not be your First Face of ReGenerative Conflict,
recreative (0)-Source notnot tension,
creolizing tensegrity
of LeftElite with Right NotNot Both-And CoElite.

You might follow a more Abrahamic Islamic-Christian-Judaeo-Nature/Spirit
ReGenesis Conflict between AdamYang LeftBrain Dominant
with EveYin RightBrain BadSeductive VirginGirl,
MatriarchalFlow-Resonance Suppressed,
repressed,
notnot Yang impressed.

Or, even further back to their regeneratively contested Apple
of his/her eye and mind
and erotic-nutritional-fertile body.

Or, even further back
to our OriginalIntent as the First Apple Tree of Life and Death,
our Yang-AboveGround Convex-EgoEmbodied Selves,
WinLose recycling nutritional healthwealth
through seasons of powerful trunk flows out toward tributary rivers of less Elite branches
and on out to our baby leaves
who will fall off our EgoBodyTrees
each decomposing AutumnHarvest,

And yet subterranean WinWin YinYin below ground ecosystemic roots
continue developing reverse-down
to nutritiously absorb embryonic EarthMother compost
to BothWinterConserve and SummerProduce-Progress
feed and fuel all our internal WinLose Yang energy above ground,
sometimes trickling down to refuel WinWin winterish revolutions
of new creolizing archipelago foresting birth
of ever reweaving-unveiling multiculturing WinWin speciation,
a new WinWin promise
of fusing YangYin ecopolitical utopia,
to sprout and reweave YangYin again,
beyond First ReGenerative Face
of creolizing environmental conflict,
toward Second ReGenesis ReGeneration
of NewArchipelago Elite,
new WinWin creolizing NotNot Elite
bilateral WinWin ReGenerations of Perpetual-Utopian RePromise.

Or, we could continue on back toward most ancient OriginalFace Intent,
to rediscover YangLeft with YinRight Eden,
the Abrahamic +1.00%/NotNot (0) RootSystemic GardenIcon
Face of Earth as Yang/Yin WinWin (0)-Source Ego/Eco Utopian
BeLiberal Left-Right eco-balancing co-empathic ego-selves.

Or, we could become the First Interdependent Face
of Yang UniversalFather
radiantly begetting VirginYin MotherEarth
uniting flow of sacred integrity’s bicameral
Positive Progress HealthWealth Theory AND Positive EcoPolitical Creolization Process Teleology,
bicameral Elite/NotElite grace,
karma,
energy,
BiLateral UnWeaving-ReVolving EcoPolitical SpaceTime
co-arising nondual RNA,
then DNA,
Constituting-Incarnating Ego/Eco-Democratic Climate Health Intent.

After that, before notnot this,
I have no WinWin timeless clue
where we might find some other
First Face of CoOperative
WinWin Conflict ReGenesis.

Standard
Uncategorized

Politics As Unusual

Creolization,
soars Dr. Jane Anna Gordon,
turns our co-empathic evolving democracy project
into a verbal,
active,
regenerative more,
degenerative less,
occasionally EliteColonizer-Pirates v NonElite-MultiCultural Prey revolutionary,
and even less occasionally Elite/NonElite Creolizing-SelfReGenerative.

What could all this Elite and NonElite political evolution and revolution
have to do with your self-optimizing, hopefully more nutritional and healthy than not, WinWin kind of optimistic day?

Well, don’t skip too quickly RightBrain averse to LeftBrain strings of complex labels and epistemological-linguistic ecosystems.

See, you just did it again.

So, pretend we are each bicameral LeftBrain Dominant EgoElites:
Wow, we sure are WinWin co-intelligent deductive/inductive bilaterally intelligent!

AND, we are also each bicameral RightBrain Suppressed EcoPolitical NonElites:
Wow, we sure are feeling nurturing and well-integrated,
and multiculturally-recreative abundant flows of NotThisInductive/NotThatDeductive dopamining hope for WinWin global co-redemptive creole-nutritional timeless relationships of love
and peace
and joy
and beauty
and reiteratively fertile-refractive-reflective-reflexive communication;
hope to cooperatively hunt and gather,
spiral and fractal-fuse,
consume and produce
ecopolitically WinWin Self/Other ReGenerative warm nurturing Optimization.

In short,
this is Eden’s most polypathically polynomially polyculturally possible
Health and Safety, defined as Positive
Bicameral Symbiotic-ReGenerative
(0)-Source Resonant
StrengthLeft/FlowRight
Fertile
CoAbundant
CoIncidental
CoArising NonDual Yang/Yin HealthyWealth,
and this is also PermaCulturing Design
on behalf of both InteriorEgo-Left
and ExteriorEco-Right Hand Dominant EcoSystemic Landscapes
LongTerm SelfPerpetuating WinElite/WinNonElite Creolization
Health and Safety EarthClimates.

Imagine this is our GoldenRule
multiculturing nutritional health trust-expansion
in LeftBrain’s thoughts and languaged consciousness,
creole-confluent with RightBrain NonElite extended Elder family,
with fear-feelings but also healthy nurturing matriarchal cooperative economies of scale
and time
and healthy-wealthy balance,
flowing our future regenerations together,
and thereby degenerating our current pathologically patriarchal-elitist conservative trends
away from struggling with BothAnd-Right WinWin,
and struggling against EitherOr-LeftTooDominant WinLose
suboptimization,
reweaving back toward DNA encrypted
nutritional regenerative strings
of (0)-sum Fertile OriginalIntent Information,
(-,-) Convex/ConCave CoRelational NotYangSpace, then also Not(NotYin) Time.
[Yin-squared WinWin = PolyPathicYang-Positive/Positive].

Creolization of Elite/NotElite Ego/EcoPolitical Relations
turns our co-empathic democracy project
into a regenerative Yang,
decomposing WinWin BiLateral Yin,
Elite/NonElite Creolizing-SelfReGeneration
of +(1.00)% UniversalYang Win
nondually co-defines dipolar (-,-)0% Sacred Creole-Acclimation Symbiotic Evolution (long-term nutritional ElderRight Brain)
and EcoPolitical Original BiCameral Constitutional Intent
(short-term Health and Safety Conserving LeftBrain EgoDeductiv
is also Inductive WinLeftWinRight-EquiValent Creolization CoOperating ClimateDominance.

Creolization, with Dr. Gordon,
is Sacred Ecology Mutual-Symbiotic DoubleBinding Acclimation, Dr. Bateson,
is NewLeftDeductive-Languaged evolving from ElderRightBrain,
probably more cooperative-matriarchal reverse-hierarchically BothAnd phylogenic-integrative, Dr. Jaynes,
both Exegetical LeftBrain Scientific Creole-Revolutionary
and Continuing BothAnd RightBrain Inductive Evolutionary-ReGenerateFlow, Dr. Kuhn,
and StrictPaternalisticYang-Right Elite-Conservative of ShortTerm Health and EgoSafety
and NurturingMatriarchal Yin-Left NonElite Progressives
LongTerm Creole-NurtureFeelers, Dr. Lakoff.

Creolization
as ecopolitical mutual acclimation,
bicameral cooperation through co-empathic nondual trust,
polyculturing climax,
Beloved MultiCulturing Gospel CoMessianic Community,
as Alpha/Omega TippingPoints,
postcolonial revolutionary Original Intent
of HealthyWealth optimizing
ecosystemic and humanely economic empowering
bicameral YangLeft/YinRight,
also UniversalEgo/Unitarian-Matriarchal-ReGenerative
EcoLogical Health and Prosperity
BiCameral Constitutions.

All democratic bicameral constitutions
have been Originally Intended
to converge toward WinWin creole-cooperative ecopolitics
by diverging from monoculturing EgoLeftBrain EitherWin-OrLose
Survivalist-Supremacist-Royalist-Entitlement Dominance.

Creolization,
our WinWin RightBrain’s cooperative BothAnd evolutionary experience
co-governing with competitive EitherOr devolutionary decomposition of renouned labels,
selecting only these most nutritious polypathic co-mentors
for next day’s health as cooperative Elite/NonElite wealthing journey.

Standard
Uncategorized

The PostElection Interview

This is not really a test.
More of a survey,
so there are no right or left answers.

Did you mean to say
Answers are both right and wrong?

Yes.
Isn’t that what I said?

Not quite, but go ahead.

How would you characterize the Obama Administration
right now,
and how might that compare with how you would characterize
the incumbent King Donald the Second Administration?

I don’t think you meant to say that either.
What department is this survey from?
The PsychWard or the Politically Incorrect Scientists?

Well…
Both, I guess,
but we call them the Positive Bicameral EcoPolitical Scientists.

Do we?

Yes, well,
perhaps you could respond to my question first,
and then we can get back to yours?

Sure, fine.
OK.
The Obama Administration looks and sounds and tastes and feels
like being part of a richly robust creole quasi-vegetarian stew,
maybe with some deep-ecology WinWin multicultural investment bread
on the more RightHand Dominant side.

Good. And the Trump Administration,
what happens to your creole stew,
and the multigenerational polypathic cooperatively-owned and produced
OriginalIntent Constitutional-Exegetical Manna?

The Trump Administration looks and sounds and distastefully creepy-feels
like being lost in a Conserving Survivalist MonoCulturing Supremacist Patriotic GodComplex,
like Schizophrenic AntiDemocratic RightBrain Oppositional Defiant Disorder,
struggling against LeftBrain Terror, Fear, and Anger cycles of LoseLose
cognitive-affective chronic-paranoid WinLose Capitalist-Violent-Supremacist
Left-Right Dysfunctional BiCameral Imbalance,
lack of Both/And RightBrain nurturing/DNA-naturing Health and WellBeing
EcoPolitical RightBrain Repressed ImBalance.

Interesting that your Obama Administration icon
also acts as a normative-prescriptive ecopolitical WinWin optimization
ecosystemic cooperative design recipe,
when decomposed into its rich-dense root-systemic creolization
trans-regenerational cooperative
matriarchal-sometimes domestically dominant
embryonic enculturation
polypathic regenerative health and wellbeing image
of quasi-vegetarian creole stewing
with multigrain optimally-healthwealthing bread,
composted with Earth’s regenerative-of-life
Left-Right CoFertility.

But your Trump Administration absence of sensory-neural RightBrain-LeftBrain confluent ecological-ecopolitically cooperative balance,
carries with it no heart-chakra sensory-nutritional,
or even digestive resonant v pathological, icon.
I see no creole stew equivalence or metaphorical comparison
through any of your sensory-inductive memory-conscious RightBrain eco-systemic DNA-scripted centers.

The Trump Administration smells like rabidly spreading fear-mongering,
which is bad,
like hot rancid death.

The Trump Administration tastes like it smells,
like something one would be wiser to disinvest of,
as mutually-politely as WinLose Dominant Elitists are capable.

Maybe a handshake of mutual best intentions,
and a generous corporate tax right-off
he agrees to turn all his privately-held corporations
over to the Trump Cooperative Ownership and EcoManagement Guild,
because, after all,
that’s what a healthy and truly safe WhiteMale Patriarchal WinWin God
would have wished he had LeftBrain Dominantly done instead.

In my continuing Obama Administration,
I hear John Debney’s “Creole Resurrection”
and “The Passion of the Christ”
echoes through the background of herstory.

In discontinuing the Trump Administration instead,
I hear Jerry Goldsmith’s “Exorcism Suite”
but also, dissonantly, Alfred Newman’s “PostRevolutionary Original Intent Prelude”
with both “The Omen” and “How the West was Lost”
playing on Right and LeftBrain simulcasting bicameral screens
of screaming dissonance.

Excellent.
Now,
in response to your question,
Do we both call ourselves Positive/DoubleBind NotNot Negative
BiCameral EcoPolitical Scientists?

No.
We call ourselves PermaCultural (0)-Source HealthLeft-Dominant/ElderWisdom WealthRightFlow
co-arising nondual resonant,
more than quite so much LeftBrain historical Elite enculturation dominance
co-mentors,
maybe economically cooperative co-redemptive owners of NationStates
EliteLeft/NonEliteMatriarchalRight eco-dominant,
maybe WinWin ecopolitical Left/Right Health and WellBeing
Positive PolyPathic Bodhisattva Warriors.

You had me with ecopolitical
co-empathic
trusting health-wealth WinWin co-arising optimizers,
self/other co-regenerative transgenerational mentors.

I don’t think I actually said that.

No need. I felt it.

Standard
Uncategorized

Absorbing Outcomes

Is Permaculturally Intelligent Design
for PolyPathic Outcomes
about anything more than noticing
and hunting and gathering
and then nutritionally decomposing
our optimal (0)-Core Abundance?

i suppose it depends
whether you are consuming a multigenerational creole stew
or producing a polyculturally sef-regenerating landscape.

What if I wanted to consume my stew
while co-mentoring our abundantly nutritious well-being landscape?

isn’t that more of a healthy wealth climate opportunity?

Perhaps it depends
whether your LeftBrain deductively thinks in visual landscapes
and our RightBrain strains to cooperatively hear
and zing with robust spicy creole stews.

Standard
Uncategorized

Nuclear Family Issues

Might we be having trouble fusing nuclear energy,
as opposed to the more troubling nuclear fission’s anti-energy,
because nuclear fusion is just normal everyday Business As Usual
cooperation of thermodynamically fusing nuclei?

Oh, I see,
like it’s easier to notice you’re having another nice healthy day
after you experience the divisive holacaustic implosive alternative?

Yes dear.
Like visiting my lovely mother
and not your dreaded mother-in-law.

Standard
Uncategorized

Adam and Eve

It remains my tightly held Health and WellBeing intention,
for the good of me,
yes,
but for everyone, eventually,
to continue to Win now,
although I realize this requires further Loss of and by Others
who may justifiably feel Earth’s survival of the fittest
has boxed them into unfit margins of unnecessarily pathological health and not-so-wellbeing.

Even so,
and here I remain RightBrain disappointed
to the extent I can LeftBrain see your eyes at all,
or even Right and LeftBrain hear you
with my Ego/Eco-Conscious sensory imbalance,
I require your forbearing patience with my trickle down theory,
my Win Wealth Now for your Health-WellBeing Later.

Didn’t your mamma raise any kids who survived?
Take your conservative elitist MeNow-YouLater WinLose attitude,
and try again with some of mamma’s progressive health-nurturing bicameral flow,
Left and RightBrain WinWin confluent,
at least try to remember your ecological balance point of Original Intent
through cooperative struggling with,
and not all your BigMan competitive struggling against,
my Elder healthnetwork root-feeding system,
trickling up toward your BigMan branches.

Nutrients can trickle down to the Earth you wipe your BigMan feet on
only if,
more primordially and embryonically and phylogenically,
and agapically and erotically,
healthywealth trickles up cooperatively
from my richly composted nutrient root system
of polypathic-organic ecopolitical WinWin all the time,
for this generation
as for past
and for future Original Continuing Revolutionary Intent
for and from and of and about and why
and what and when and where and how of
EarthTribe’s Family AppleTree,
and not so much Win BigApple Biceps
ignoring your own truly conservative
Health and WellBeing root systemic death.

Well, excuse me.

For what?

For trying to overpower your trickle up
with my trickle down.

You still don’t get it, honey.
But I see you are trying–
and deep learning effort counts here in Eden’s potential cooperative.

That sounded condescending.

Well, excuse me.

For what?

For trying to trickle up OUR Left-Right ecosystem of consciousness
while you were still WinLose LeftBrain dominantly trickling down
your survivalist wisdom.
But, honestly,
isn’t it about time we turned our survivalist evolution
around
toward thrivalist WinWin Left-Right EquiValent Revolution
of and for this HealthyWealth Apple Tree,
and our and it’s self-regenerative Earth-forest?

Are you talking about Eden’s need for some ecotherapeutic landscape design,
or are you just bitching about our sometimes struggling and suffering climate?

Adam, dearest,
you are the EitherOr guy,
I am the BothAnd WinWin Eve
of EcoFeminist EcoPolitical Left-Right Balance,
still trickling up.

Yeah, sorry,
I think I lost my trickle down WinLose concentration for a minute.

No problem.
Shit happens.

Standard
Uncategorized

Wedding Questions

Honey…

Yes, dear.

When a woman and a man get married,
why does the woman traditionally stand on the man’s left,
rather than his right?

Most men are LeftBrain right hand dominant.
So they’re used to keeping that hand free
of unfortunate encumbrances.

You’re not very nice.
That couldn’t possibly be right,
or left, for that matter.
More likely they keep it free to take care of themselves
especially if they’re getting married for the first time.

Or the second, or the third…
But, how is that different from what I said?

So, when two guys or two women get married,
how do they know which one stands on the left
and which is on the right?

Maybe they flip a coin.

Would heads, then, stand on the right
and tails on the left?

Honey,
why do you think I would have the first clue?
Honestly, I suspect it has taken them so long
for us to be OK about how they untraditionally lie down together
that nobody, except you, is yet even wondering
how they should stand up together.

Standard
Uncategorized

Answers Without Questions

Why do answers end with answers
while questions seem to begin with yet more questions?

As a case in point…

How are the Case Studies of economic and political history
different than Einstein’s Thought Experiments?

Wait a minute…

Yes, well that’s not really a difference, I think.
Thought Experiments and Case Study expositions
both begin with waiting a minute to notice cause-effect narrative,
to decompose relationships between systemically dynamic parts.
Imagining in reverse time,
from now as cause
back toward effects
leading up to this current cause,
this current noticing,
this sometimes chaotic and unsettling waiting a minute
to notice what I am struggling with.

Why does this Case of dynamic thought exposition
feel like my important,
yet complex,
systemically dense and intricate,
hopefully even richly resonant,
question to ask,
within all the vast universe of questions
I could be investing in right now with you,
instead?

That’s more or less, probably more,
what I was trying to point out
before you interrupted me.
Isn’t our dialogical rule
also our Golden Rule?
We see richer, more fertile and optimal, outcomes,
responses to our internal Thought Experiment questions,
including our familial Dysfunctional Case Studies,
and our ecopolitical Conserve v Progress Democratic Health and Safety Case Studies,
when we begin by asking how our appositionals are somehow the same.

OK, fine.
And sorry for cutting in
when I meant to be cutting with.

Sometimes you are so fundamentalist,
so Either the Same Or Different.
By now, dearest ConservativeRight,
I would have more patiently hoped
When I ask how things are different
I really both mean to look at how they are the same and different.
So, how are Healthy Thought Experiments and Fertile Case Studies
the same?

I think we just agreed they both begin with noticing nutritional elements
and decomposing reverse effect back through potentially complex causal networks
of cooperative opportunity.

Yes, but Einstein’s Thought Experiments were metaphysical,
mathematics and unnatural science,
while Case Studies are more like watching Physical SpaceTime Reality Shows,
and Economic and Political Disaster LoseLose Devolutionary Games.

How did I know that you would respond to your own question,
about how ecological thought systems are the same,
with how they are different?

Sorry, honey,
seems to be an inductive RightBrain neglect of mine.
But, do you agree or disagree,
or both, somehow,
that Einstein’s Experiments were about metaphysical spacetime operations
while Historical Case Study Operas
are about saying and singing and dancing
actual physical and natural,
maybe even spiritual..
Wait, no, that would be over in the Metaphysics Department.

Yeah, probably better to stick to the natural realities of Earth
spawning ecological systems and cooperative thought networks.

Another difference
Einstein hoped his Thought Experiments would lead to True,
and therefore not also False,
Either/Or mathematical statements about time and energy
and the speed of light’s travel
across and through evolving and revolving appositional space.

But, when you write your Dysfunctional Extended Family Case Studies,
you couldn’t realistically hope your appositional Elite/NonElite narrative
would lead to regeneratively True,
and therefore not degeneratively False,
ecological systemic statements
about LeftEgo’s Dominating sense of time
as both positive and unfortunately too often negative-degenerating energy
and (0)-sum speed of BiLateral EnLightenment travel
across and through evolving
and revolving
regenerative health and safety space stories.

Really! Whyever not?

Because that would be confusing a LeftBrain Either-Or metaphysical thought experiment
with its appositional
NotThisEgoForm-NotThatEcoSystemic temporal-neural cooperative-nurturingflow function,
Both/And RightBrain (0)-Source
WinWin
Integral-ReGenerativity Embryonic DNA/RNA-Hypothesis.

If you say so,
but it all sounds LeftElite complex
and merely RightNonElite chaotic,
(0)-sum equivalent pay,
but still Business As CaseStudy DysFunctional WinLose,
to me.

Sorry love.
Don’t shut me down.
Just doing my LeftBrain Either/Or job.
Either Win deductive truth
Or Lose inductive notnot appositional-integrity flow.

Why is it that your EgoWin perspective
always gets the shorter definition,
while you stumble all over my WinWin NotNot way
to come up with some longer way of noticing
my nutritionally elegant nurturing Elder-ecological
health and safety lovely bilateral ways?

It’s the convex spatial Yang in EgoMe.
But, you know how I’m only at my EgoRegenerative best
when totally immersed in your BothAnd WinWin
bilaterally concave
YinYin lovely Feeling Experience
acting out ecosystemic TruthFunctional Case Studies
for BiCameral PolyPathic Love Stories.

Well, when you put it that way
you come across as less of a WinLose dominating ass,
degenerative hack writer of LeftBrain survival of the fittest;
more regenerative BothAnd RightBrain balancing thrival
of our +100%Space = (-,-) Empty-Zero fit-in-ingest integrity.

Maybe Einstein’s LeftBrain dominant
EitherSpace or Time Experiments
are metaphysically different
yet RightBrain ecologically WinWin ReGenerative/DeGenerative (0)-Soul
ecosystemic-appositional,
bilateral nondual co-arising resonant.

You’re doing it again.
That thing where you are LeftBrain explicating
while I remain RightBrain bilaterally inductive feeling-integral implicated
to somehow not really quite deductively exist
outside of timeless now.

Well, you just did the same thing.

That’s only because you have a monopoly on reductive temporal language development.

Sorry, babe,
but what else can I bicamerally do?
You smell and taste and feel just as nutritious and nurturing.

And sometimes pathological and toxic
thanks to your LeftBrain domination of ecopolitical history,
your infrequen health-nurturing matriarchal cooperative creation stories
are too often drowned out by your distorted YangEgo Space struggles against,
rather than with,
my YinYin WinWin sense of ecosystemic well-being timed Feeling Experience.

Are you feeling nutritional integrity progressive-suppressed again?

I am prevolutionarily near-diastatic,
just as you ConservativeElitist hope not.

How about if I deductively meet you half way?
Both oppositionally different
and appositionally evolving toward integrative
inductive
co-relational confluence narratives?

Now that could produce some Tipping point
conserveRight-progressLeft climate ecstatic fireworks!

You’re just teasing me, aren’t you?
This has all just been foreplay for inductive you,
to get me all WinWin bicamerally polypathic hot.
I feel so used.

Don’t pretend your co-investment in our regenerative health
and progressing future through EarthTribe babies
doesn’t like it.

Could you talk a little dirtier,
and leave out the kids part?

You mean Earthier,
deductive-inductive nurturing co-relational climaxes of nutrition,
followed not by post-revolutionary Elite/NonElite bickering,
but thriving future regenerations of optimally fertile healthywealth.

Is this a bicameral Thought Experiment we’re having
or a bilateral Case Study about regenerative appositionals
of convex EgoSpace
with concave bilateral EarthTime dialogical syntax?

Yes, baby,
bilaterally different later
if noticing our WinWin bicameral possibilities now.

Ummm.
That sounds like you’re ready
to stop noticing
and start our healthy orthopraxis?

Baby, you’re the Thought Experiment writer;
I’ve always been your LoveCase Study
of and for and through and by
SpaceTime’s co-arising nonduality.

Standard