Uncategorized

Einstein and Bucky’s Fifth Quarter

Bucky:
Why didn’t you remind people
that relativity of spacetime relationship
is double-bound and fractally rhythmed
under he Commons Metric Assumption
of 3 spatial and 1 bilateral progenitive time dimension
equals a Zero-Moment spacetime-centric
balancing thermodynamic theory?

Einstein:
Why didn’t you choose my word “relativity”
rather than your more positive-slanted “synergy”
in your geometrics of universal consciousness?

Bucky:
Eulerian prime relationality is midway positive
but also double-knotted and fractal negative,
as convex-within.
If Synergetics has a positive stance,
it may also be true
that “relativity” has a negatively-reductive slant.
Zero-Core Concave/Convex Universe
as Prime Relationship
feels more nondually transparent
than a Universal Theory of Relativity…
but, oh yes, by the way,
this Relativity of space and time story
takes place
within our shared assumption
of 4 equidimensional dynamics
as Prime Fractal SpaceTime Relationship.

Einstein:
I don’t recall saying anything about fractals,
although I did stipulate a 3-Space and 1-Time
Universe
as we know it in human-consciousness.

Bucky:
But c-squared begins with a fractal.
Square roots
regenerate metric-logical fractals.
To commodify the speed of light’s 0-Core Time
as “c-squared”
is to point directly at Bohm’s Implicate Order
of fractal form and functional dynamic syntax
st-ringing theory.

Einstein:
You think too much in ecologic.
Math and physics
boil and toil and trouble
more inclusively as Group Theory.

Bucky:
Well,
have you been following what Thurston
and Perelman
and those folks
have been saying
about the double-elliptical binding 0-soul core
of any integrative,
confluent,
and logically possible,
rational system?

Einstein: No, zero is much too small
to timelessly hold
my eternally universal interest.

Bucky:
Not that I always need the last word
but zero is also much too timeless
to share your expansive consciousness.

Einstein:
Hah!
That was a good one.

Standard
Uncategorized

Fuller’s Cosmic Consciousness

Said Harvard to Bucky
we feel quite so lucky
your genius on campus
has caused quite a ruckus
but this time we’re sure you’re less mucky;

And yet we’re not sure
which department could endure
your thesis exegetical
your wisdom eisegetical
of what is and is not we’re less sure.

Perhaps you’re a poet
and the last ego to know it,
you thought this was science
mixed up with con-science,
your poetic verse helps you show it.

When Bucky wrote meta-physical science
we read him as physical conscience
and that could be fine
it fits with his rhyme
of teleopathic resonance.

There once was a Fuller who prehended
a Special Case universe co-prehensile
teleopathic embrace
wears polypathic face
as wisdom’s synergetic eco-tensile.

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

Reincarnate Earth Day Conversations

Buckminster Fuller and Julian Jaynes recently reviewed their cultural and scientific influence on health and well-being ecological and economic outcomes during the current Transitional Era.

Bucky: I wish I had spent more time speaking as a Unitarian Positive Teleologist. Perhaps that would have taken care of the overly recessive trends in cultural awareness of what, in retrospect, was published but not really read or comprehended fully; undervalued and ignorantly ignored:

1. “Synergy,” everything I ever published about the topic of “synergy,” is spiritually and intuitively defined as love, in Western cultures, and naturally and organically defined as compassionate mindfulness in Eastern traditions.

2. The encoded regenerative fractal structure of Physical Universal Intelligence follows DNA/RNA thermodynamic, electromagnetic, permacultural, economic, and ecological Prime Relationship balance; and evolutionary dynamics are fractal-dipolar revolving harmony Convex-Exterior-Yang OVER Concave-Interior-Yin (0)-Core Vector Rooted octaves and branching tree structures. And, if I had run into Lin Yutang and Taoism before I published, I think I would have connected Yang metaphysical principles with Convex-Exterior physical principles, and Yin metaphysics with Concave-humane natured Interior physical principles of bicameral consciousness.

Julian: Yes, I can see that same sense of ethological and ecological and teleological dynamic and emergent awareness in the Left-brain’s evolution out from RNA regenerative temporal memory. My neural theory of bicameral older-right v. linguistic-deductive organized left information processing, cultural, and historical development, seems to support your equivalency between “synergy” and “love-confluent consciousness,” as well as Gregori Perelman’s work, and William Thurston’s too, in Group Theory, and I wonder if there isn’t something in there that pertains to the logistics and statistical/strategic trend predictions of Cooperative Game Theory, using reverse-hierarchy Win-Win assumptions.  You know, so no one id-entity can optimally win until the weakest link in our chain of interdependence achieves equivalent outcome values?

Bucky: Absolutely. Synergy and love retain integrity, balance, harmony between Left-languaged deductive memory and Right-proportional inductive experiential conscience codex of positive v. negative feeling and personal awareness, like what Polanyi calls “Personal Knowledge.”

Julian: So synergy and love and confluence are neurally appositionally responsive to messages that do not cause cognitive dissonance, disease, dismay, lack of equivalent metric balance and energetic harmony.  Compassionate mindfulness becomes eco-comprehension optimized through balancing Left-brained Yang and Right-brained Yin bicameral functions.

Bucky: Yes, I wish the Clay Math Challenge folks would have realized that Synergetics is really all about the Polynomial v. Not-Polynomial information lack of integrity v. entropy problem, just as Thomas Kuhn’s work in deductive cultural revolutions became troubled with the Problem of Incommensurability.

If +Polynomial information does not equal rational and sustainable Universal Optimized Intelligence, then positive does not equal a double negative.

(-)(-)Reverse-Polynomial Right-brain DNA/RNA regenerative systemic Prime Relationship balancing trends, when disrupted, cause cultural depression, autistic trend development in populations that feel over-crowded and under-nourished, anxious, post-millennial dismay, climate change self-correction urgency, sense of crisis.

Julian: You want to bet on how long it takes the scientific and religious sectors to recognize that binary information systems translate +/-(0)-Core QBits of form and function as humane natural comprehensive systems transliterate binomial

Yang+P Space Exterior Landscape = (-)(-)Yin-ReversePolynomial Time Interior Landscape?

Bucky: Well, sure. I always bet on Here-Yang = Now-Yin, to optimize Universal Intelligence cultural comprehension.

Julian: Yes, and you are also the Plan B guy  who understood Universal SuperEco = Panentheistic God = Mutual Messianic Interdependent Speciation and Evolution, but those Transition Generation permaculturing bicameral brains almost inevitably ask, “Bucky who?” and what is a Julian Jaynes, isn’t that some kind of an orange drink?

Standard
Uncategorized

Resonating Railroad Tracks

The direct sensing of information may sometimes be deceptive and illusory due to such factors as coincidence, congruence, or the time-and-angle distortions of perspective. For instance, the parallel railroad tracks seem (mistakenly) to converge at the horizon,…

Buckminster Fuller, 100.021, p. 5, Synergetics 2, 1979)

 

Coincidental awareness:

To sense coincidental information,

it helps to remember,

Left hemisphere sees Other Universe

as +Object,

while Right sees Other

as SuperEco “Self-identity”

Subject (-)(-).

 

Prime Relationship of Subject/Object bicamerality,

evolves coincidental binomial consciousness.

 

Rational Left-Right balancing confluent minds

try

stress and strain

to retain confluent coincidental bi-reiteratively

and multisystemically balancing

Prime Relationship.

Coincidental binomial and binary information structure

of human nature’s consciousness emerges

from Julian Jaynes toward Buckminster Fuller’s

theory of polypathic Universal Intelligence,

coincidental coherency of Right-Left hemispheric

“self” ego-consciousness as identity

with and without cognitive dissonance.

 

Without cognitive dissonance,

human nature self-optimizes with Positive Psychology,

and Positive Deviance Theory,

as (0)-sum ecologically Win-Win Therapeutic Game Theory

and economic transactions of well-being nutrient values,

redeeming their disvalue double-bound dipolar appositionals.

EcoTherapy sprouts mutual mentoring praxis

of Permaculture Design outcoming sustained Climax Community optimization,

regeneration of Universally Intelligent

and Synergetic Natural

Physical Universe Open Convex/Concave Systems.

 

But, with cognitive dissonance adds DNA to RNA’s primal identity,

creating coincidental conversations between bi-elliptical negativity

as implicately ordering human incarnating Memory.

Right Elder nature,

character,

icon of wise intelligence

evolves RNA-encoded

as prime regenerate-fractal 4-based crystal structure.

Dynamic prime relationship DNA,

double-bound elliptical,

evolves a temporal-linear linguistic string of distancing/densing Memory,

reaching back for confluence with Right-Elder’s RNA

static-double-bound ecological paradigms of coincidental consciousness,

learning and development,

cooperative economics, values, norms,

synergetic balance,

and permacultured design and resolution.

 

Left sees rising and narrowing

converging railroad tracks and paradigms emerging synergetic

“Other” Universe as Object,

while Right sees SuperEco Not-Not Self,

inviting Subjective Ego

to follow this trail,

originating with  Original Id-entity,

to culminate in Objective SuperEcoTherapeutic

Omega Point of time’s predicted NOW.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Functional Human Family

Real life is a graced ecology

in which we learn compassion

for Self and Other-EcoSelf

by growing in mindfulness

of Self as integral to Other,

and vice versa.

 

Growing in positive mindfulness

can feel more like work camp

than a peace-filled Paradise Ashram.

 

When I comprehend

Work Camp is the Trimtab,

trim-the-fat,

tipping point

purgative learning invitation

toward enlightened love full-promised,

then perfect compassion occupies my mind.

Longing sweeps in toward universal belonging.

 

When life together feels like

monolithic Boot Camp,

and not so much Campy Play

and it seems no way

it could ever feel another way,

then I mindfully reverse

so it looks like

sure-footed positive intent toward

compassionate campus of soulful practice

with each of us all day

OR positive intent becomes shared vocation

to help each other understand

when this golden feeling evaporates

and why

and how we might help each other

more mindfully approach our messy dysfunctions together,

a functioning natural family

called “human” nature.

 

If human life,

and other natural systems,

feels more like a root canal

than gold-capped stress relief,

then water the memories of past gold caps

by imagining how this root canal

already builds toward your sustainably

healthy tooth

in the mouth of this well-fed community

living in polyculturing planet’s

positive potential Eternal Moment.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

The President’s EcoChaplain

Sr. Kathleen Brennan, of the Order of Positive Intentions, is the 11th Interreligious EcoMinister Chaplain to the U.S. Congress, where she has been unusually…useful, and apparently ubiquitous. President Fuller is suffering from 2nd-term despondence-syndrome. His Cabinet seems to be leaking, the House is total chaos, and, while the Senate is somewhat more bicamerally balanced, good intentions far outweigh sustainable outcomes. Fuller feels ironically emptier of hope, much less faith that this mess will reweave into a viable fabric within his life time, much less his remaining two years.

When Ms. Fuller, his wife, found him flirting with suicidal ideation, she rather firmly invited onto his schedule a pastoral visit with the Congressional EcoMinister. Although not exactly sure that this appointment would add up to a regenerative future, his not-so-little intuitive voice resonated hopefully with this suggestion because of Sr. Brennan’s reputation as somehow unusually…useful.

President: Sr. Brennan, good of you to stop by. Hoping you might be able to help.

Chaplain: In what way, Mr. President?

P: Well, certainly not that way. Just “Bucky” please. “Mr. President” feels much too heavy right now, like somebody else I never really wanted to be.

C: So presidential Bucky isn’t unfolding as you had hoped, or intended, somehow.

P: I see what you did there, that reference to your Order’s vocational formation. What does that mean, anyway, I don’t recall meeting anyone else from the Positive Intentions Order. Ironic, Washington is a veritable compost pile of good intentions that don’t seem to come together anywhere close to whatever it is you are doing with this Positive Intention ecotherapy, or whatever you call it.

C: You covered quite a lot of ground there, Bucky. Maybe it would be helpful to talk about this disparity between your good intentions and how you define Positive Intent.

P: Well, maybe that’s part of my problem, while I am painfully aware that the road toward good intentions has killed far more people than malignant intent, I can’t work out why, exactly.

C: I doubt you know anyone with malignant intent.

P: What would you call suicidal ideation?

C: I would call that an oxymoron, If you have a positive intent toward self-destruction, you cannot actually incarnate that potentiality without sacrificing the positive polarity of your intended trajectory toward a sustainably peaceful life.

P: My life has been to try to be useful, where most needed, as inclusively as possible. But, it is the inclusivity itself that seems so utterly impossible from this position in Universal Intelligence.

C: Which is…?

P: As I am sure you know very well, the Regenerative System Development Platform has advocated for a cooperative (0)-sum post-millennial Trimtab transition for optimizing global Continuous Quality Improvement.

C: Quite a circular mouthful. So, your positive-teleological position revolves around this (0)-PrimeMutual value system. Is that how you define our “good intentions?”

P: Probably, although I would certainly use a lot more words, and numbers, and generate many polysyllabic hybrids about natural-metric systems development.

C: That does seem to be where you lose your constituency, all the irrational words, numbers, and assumption of malignant intent within the belief systems of those who oppose you, those malingering “Nay!”-sayers.

How do you reconcile your faith that we are all in this mess together with this fear of some proactive, organized, Order of Malignant Intent? While I doubt you have met anyone wearing society’s imprimatur of “Hopeless Sociopath,” I have spent some time in your prisons. A bicameral system with addictive sociopathology issues explores homicide as vicarious suicide. It feels like naked-wild risk, with the prophylactic of clothed hiddenness.

My (0)-sum win-win faith, and positive teleological intent, are not compatible with the view that your constituency would elect representatives who are addicted sociopathologists.  In other words, I wonder if you are confusing Positive Intent toward a regenerative, and sociotherapeutic, economy with Negative Intent toward globally inclusive suicide, as a species, and personally, within yourself.

P:  While I would be vastly relieved to learn that I am confused about the Other-Side’s malignant intent, I just can’t get my data-crunchers to come up with that optimized sustainable outcome trajectory. I mean, for example, if the rich and powerful define Winning the Economy Game as continuing to grow their wealth deposits, then all our synthesized projections for the future show exploding global population of increasingly marginal poverty, to say nothing of what it is doing to the dimming prospects of any (0)-carbon air-bound/soil-bound balanced ecosystem surviving anywhere on Earth.

C: So, your global information system is telling you that we cannot play a Win-Win Sustainable Ecology Game using Win-Lose socio-economic strategies.

Try this metaphor. Imagine that your constituency is a population of lotus flowers, able to physically see each other only above the surface of our Earth-pond. Your Prime (0)-sum cooperative economic platform is the pond’s surface. But, when you plunge down, under the surface, you can see that our species’ (0)-sum ecological center goes deeper down to where we share an emergent root system reaching down, with diminishing, yet still positively-regenerative intentional structure, into Earth’s rich polycultured compost. This cooperative permaculture feeds our root system, so nutrients flowing up have a regenerative infrastructural trajectory for all the individual lotus flowers, and their seed-bearing future generations.

On the other hand, one of the lotus flowers decides that he and his neighbors are more important than some other weedy-kinda-flowers on the other side of the pond, so they start sucking up all the nutrients, watching their distant RNA-cousins wilt and suffer, under the mistaken belief that they are protecting their childrens’ future while they are actually strangling their entire economic and ecological root-systemic capacity. The apparent suicidal ideation of those wilting flower-cultures on the other side of Earth’s pond are a lesson to all of us: Don’t forget that we are all (0)-sum centered where information fully reflects our most inclusive root system. This deeper ecologically balanced plateau emerges endosymbiotic Win-Win cooperative economies for nutrient flow up toward the next generation of lotus flowers.

Your suicidal ideation is your poli-cultural teacher, reminding you that we are all in this together, regardless of all the push-back necessary to bring global peace to the surface of Earth’s pond. You have no more right to choose suicide, Bucky, than a bipolar sociopath has to choose homicide. Choose to regenerate inclusive, cooperative polycultures; avoid malignant competitive monocultural silos of us-v-them, and me-v-we boundaries.

P: Is that your spiritual advice?

C: That’s my eco-equity Continuous Quality Improvement permacultured advice, straight out of the Order of Positive Intent’s prayer book, for greatest effect with least dissonance. We used to call it the Golden Rule, but now we are learning to apply it somewhat more broadly, to how we treat all species, all information, all communication, moments, days, lives, learning, and generations, past, present, and future, as EcoSelf (0) = Grace of Thermodynamic Balance [+ = (-)(-), as Yang = Reverse-Yin diametric restraint, as P = NP]—not so much Self-Centric, and refusing to play nice.

P: I think I regenerate, theoretically, what you did there—and I’m feeling positive, even hopeful, about this analogical way of comprehending QBit spacetime, and bicameral in/ex-formating systems development, and comprehensive coincidentalism, and universalism, and integral intelligence, and sociotherapy, and bicameral psychotherapy, and bioethics, and….

Assuming this might go on for a few hours, Sr. Brennan, EcoMinistry Chaplain, excused herself; without any apparent interruption of Bucky’s positively regenerative, and inclusively analogical, string theory, traveling its regenerative pilgrimage toward self-perpetuating organic compost.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Infometric EcoSystems: Tegmark meets Fuller

By Max Tegmark – Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality (12.8.2013)
I appreciated Tegmark’s growing awareness of scientific research as a cooperative enterprise. It reminds me of Gregori Perelman’s reasons for disappearing into the metaphysical universe of anonymity after rejecting the Clay Millennium Math Prize for what became the 0-soul theorem.

Going back a bit further into the history of metric systems as reality and as metaphysics, I was disappointed to not find any relationship between Tegmark’s double hypothesis and the earlier work of Buckminster Fuller’s “Synergetics,” Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking in turn rooted in Euler’s understanding of metric systems as not so much about numeric symbols and forms, but about function. Fuller recognized both physical and metaphysical universes sharing a (0)-Core Vector, or Vortex, in a verb-functional relationship, and potentially rational, Whole System Universal Intelligence. So, I was surprised that Tegmark modeled and analogized about a universal metric stability, unchanging structures, rather than potentially regenerative when fractally wave-functioned, within a 4-equidimensional Information System, following Einstein’s 4-prime dimensional equi-valent assumption.

In Fuller’s field, or stage, theory of synergetic regenerativity, information explicates, emerges and sustains, our Physical Universe, just as a “Dark” exformed-implicated reverse-trending magnetic-ergetic wave frequency implicates our bicameral Metaphysical Universe. As without, so within, but right-brain cognized as an unraveling negative-reversed-film-fading icon of sensory memory. While this remains a conjecture, there is an appealing aesthetic quality to its thermodynamic and magnetic wave trend balance, with information synergetically wrapping into a physical universe string, composed of intertwined solar system strings, composed of planetary threads, and this one, called Earth, more recently pushing out a double-elliptical binomially-balanced DNA self-regenerating string.

All these string-systems are teleologically imaged as unraveling in reverse-implicated temporal wave streams of exformation. Perception yielding understanding, yielding paradigm development of raveling/unraveling relationship conjectures across rhetorical/relational/culturally-bound specialized languages and gestalts, intertwining toward theories, and theories emerging into prime relationship universal principles of emergently co-prehensile [comprehensive coincidental] systems.

I am disappointed that Max Tegmark has apparently missed the geometrics and the Universal Intelligent design of Bucky Fuller. This conversation would be a more synergetic read, and a read of this synergy might emerge as a scientific cultural Trimtab–greatest effectiveness with least anomaly or dissonance. Perhaps, underlying the other laws of thermodynamic/magnetic waving and stringing about, is the proto-historical teleological assumption that the Prime Law, or First Systemetric Principle, is the Law of Thermodynamic Balance, where + = (-)(-), and +Polynomials in any n-dimension = (-)Polynomials OR spacetime geo/biometrics are intrinsically irrational and dissonant without sustainable systemic formation, function, wave frequencies, or bicameral/binary/binomial balance.

In a balanced and positive teleological formation trend, metric form is to function, as +/- function is to positive/informative and negative/exforming frequency trends. All of this within a (0)-soul vector(+P)/vortex(-P) smooth-structured self-regenerative double-elliptical torus. Imagine a self-perpetuating tree-information system in which informative nutrients develop richly nutritious seeds that fall down into the soil providing enthymematic nutrients for the tree’s magnetic-south trending (implicating tendrils reaching down into the fertile rich soil) root system. What is positive for the root system is also positive trending for the leaves and blossom development.

So I guess the greatest sustainable effect for this +/-(0)Prime Relationship infometric development system is to water the flowers of cooperative intent and mindfulness, while listening with wisdom to the weeds of competitive paradigmatic monocultures, information silos of specialization, hoarding fatty wealth deposits, and lack of intent to communicate back through the wisdom of our elders and colleagues for the Continuous Quality Improvement of future generations.

Tegmark seems better at balancing ethical values than he is at balancing metric values and functions. And, if I had to choose which is most important to learn about, I would choose his flowers over his weeds.

Standard