Einstein’s Sacred EcoMetrics

The younger Albert Einstein
was more intrigued by geometry of experience
than mere metaphysical abstractions.

During this younger time,
he wrote about bi-optical illusions
of Ego against Eco consciousness:

“This delusion is a kind of prison for us,
restricting us to our personal desires
and affection
for a few persons
nearest to us.
Our task must be
to free
ourselves from this prison…”

Einsteinian Elders
may remember dreams
Once upon time’s bi-optical illusions
of all Sacred Species
uniting for cooperation
rather than unifying polarities
furthering competitions.

Cooperatively invested children
within Elder Paradise Dreams
grow personally then politically,
ecologically nutritious then economically healthy,
sacred as Matriarchal ElderWombs before.

Gaian Einsteinians
told campfire creation stories
of organic healthy purpose.
Sacred Teachers
assisting EarthSoul’s cooperative process
of realigning harmonies
resonantly resolving
Reforesting Agrarian Paradise.

Elder Einstein
suffered an enormously disempowering
depressive sense of loss
after his uniting nuclear fusion Though Experiment
turned into society’s atomic militarized-ballistics.

Genocide of sacredly uniting Earth,
the anti-ecological conclusion
of Yang LeftBrain supremacy,
raping and blasting
secularizing patriarchal powers
of AnthroCompetitiveness
out of systemic balance
with Elder RightBrain
Matriarchal MemoryWomb
of CoOperative CreationStory Paradise.

Elder Einstein
grew toward dementia,
but high functioning.
Perhaps he joined the oncoming spectrum
at the top of awesome wonder
inhabiting manic dreams of nightmare blasts
sensing insatiable overpopulating risks
of rabidly competing human expansion
toward cancerous monoculturalism
and concomitant territorial risks
of ever more war-mongering
in a post-nuclear
fission-dominant Age.

A time of Great Transition
toward post-millennial death of a HomePlanet
through nuclear and nationalistic fissions,
losing solidarity with Sacred Earth
as mere collateral damage
for LeftBrain Reign of stubborn WinLose ego-empowerment
and bigotry
and sexism
against RightBrain cooperative matriarchal health care restoration
and regenerative spirit-nature receiving,
preferring consciousness of fusion’s deep rich nondualistic opportunities

EcoTherapeutic Fusion Dreams
frightened away by fission’s growing Great Walls
rather than slowly revolving blue-green orbiting revisions,
as curiously slow as watching paint undry,
restoring justice Paradise.


Problems of Successful Choreography

Old misunderstandings of how Earth
and Her species
regeneratively and degeneratively change,
sometimes in revolutionary expansive/implosive quick and great transitions,
but more traditionally in slow-grow emergent spacetime development,
are often summarized in secular capitalism’s
Might Makes Fertile Right.

While this does capture the Yang strength side
of Earth’s fast and slow revolutions,
PermaCulture Design’s principles for polycultural long-term success,
rather than ego-endosymbiotic monoculturing,
this generation only, success,
stresses our need to return,
to repent, say the prophets,
to revive, say the preachers,
by turning from high individualistic-competing yields
from non-renewable fuel-driven technologies,
as if only they were God-Given,
to set an evolving clock backward toward non-regenerative energy descent,
degenerative trends
and concomitant traumas of our current overshoot
into climate and landscape pathologies,
internal-egotistical and external-anti-ecological.

Succeeding time in evolutionary reverse,
appears revolutionary to those of us who have been chosen
by colonialist capitalism’s logical transition conclusions
to retrain old faith and reliance
on using less competitive and more sustainable yields
from Father Sun’s solar Yang-radiant strength
and Mother Earth’s wind and water Yin-nurturing flows
from and for
renewing recycling restoring regenerating resources.

This is not so much about anger competition management,
and more about restorative ego/eco justice.

The problem of Might Makes Right success stories
is they patriarchally dominate,
and matriarchally suboptimize,
Yin’s ecofeminist flow opportunities
for maximum yield
and optimal cooperative-constitutional nutritional reinvestment.

Patriarchy’s singularity,
intrinsic domineering supremacy,
hides its oppression of our bilateral
nondual co-arising matriarchal/patriarchal
network stretching and extending multiculturing balance
ego/eco opportunities.

Yin’s embryonic,
nutrition-nurturing ego/eco zero-sum equivalence,
but within an open ecological Universe,
with WinWin positive polynomial and polypathic bicamerality
with double-binding negative ambivalent N(NP)
effect-cause spacetime dipolar co-arising
spiral re-linearity,
the very sideways holonic
fractal/octave “8” scale octave structure
of regenerative bilateral DNA
and RNA,
and our iconic nature symbol for Eternity,
without stipulating whether perpetuating successes
emerge toward Paradise
or DualDark entropic chaos,
dark Yang v Yin
over light C-Yin and C-Yang
as c-squared dipolar appositional
as Eulerian ergodic harmonic fractal
as Fullerian 0-sum cooperative synergetic thermodynamics
deduct freedom from/induct freedom to
4-equivalent dimensional
co-arising organic spacetime.

This problem with capitalism’s evolutionary success
is its cultural weight too far beyond devolutionary overshoot
of Might Makes Patriarchally Left v Matriarchal Right
outmoded unbalanced paradigms.

This way of not seeing,
and therefore voting for,
perversely supporting unhealthy Earth’s anti-wealthiest devolutionary future
is intrinsically anti-Christian,
and anti-multiculturing religious,
anti-sacred ecology
in general
and basic ego/ecojustice principle.

Capitalism’s competitive excesses
desecrate Earth’s cooperative Commons
essentially by denying this wisdom of regenerative-cooperative
democratic co-reinvestment in future healthy abundance;

Which is not a logical or ecological possibility
in the co-presence of Yin-Matriarchal-Cooperative
flow-power enculturing equivalence,
advocating for climates and landscapes of healthywealth ambivalence,
polycultural and polypathic and polynomial and multiculturing
polyphonically creolizing
capitalism’s tradition as understory
of Earth’s cooperative nutritional health
as mutual trust economy.

WinLose games and ecopolitical strategics of Me Against You
do not sustain when they dominate
within an ecosystem,
a population,
a democratic citizenry,
a universe,
a ReIterative Communication Gaming Frame,
or even within attempts to retain open communication lines,
requiring both Yang-integrity speaking skills
and Yin bilateral cause-effect-cause
recycling co-arising dipolar listening skills.

If capitalism is a true success of Earth’s wealth history,
how is it also notnot potential failure
for Earth’s healthiest Paradise retention potential?

Scientific method,
to become and remain optimally successful,
has always theoretically watched
for importance of both deductive Win/Lose tests,
and cooperative mutually-inductive, co-informing, communications
transcending specialized paradigms,
promoting WinWin speciated learning
reiteratively delineating successes,
permacultural nutritional outcome production,
not just information about what has been consumed
from and in our past,
but also wisdom about what we could produce
more transliteratively danced and sung together.

Too long articulated hypostasis
is also too immature creolization potential;
these two nondually co-arising together
rebeginning ourselves toward sacred dipolar re-acclimations.


Geometrics of EcoPolitical Choice

I prefer to live on a multicultural planet
where one plus one is two,
and so is one times one,
except when we’re blending our positives and negatives,
when one moment in time notnot one
indeed does equal both nomial one
and yet also continues to imply binomial two,
or binary two,
for those who think more digital emerging Bayesian trends
than ecological analogical true
as symmetrically balancing beauty.

One plus one always equals two.
But, sometimes one thing multiplied one time
equals an exegetically consistent one-thing
while also eisegetically-heuristically implying
for however brief a timeless anticlimatic moment, two;
one before spatial variable
from one moment into next, co-arising,
another nondual spacetime emergent thing of binomial interdependent becoming
integratively implies within each polynomially and polypathically informing ecologic,
bicamerally health/pathology ecoconscious,
imaging and reimaging discontinuously,
this yet nondual co-arising event
within life’s interdependent empire-building time of collective memories
back to notnot Black fertile embryonic cosmological climate.

Temporally continuous evolutioning
of nutritious-fertile language and geometric anticipations,
emerges entrenched empirical, yet still undead stretching memory
etched in metric strings of fertile Earth’s deeply regenerate learning,
ecopolitically cooperative
consilient DNA/RNA;

multicultural iconic climatologist of 1 times 1 (0)-sum bicameral health
and less resonantly resolving disharmonious subclimates
within one revolving/evolving
naturally systemic
enspirited ecopolitical game
exchanging dissonant irrational pathologies.

When all is finally (0) sum souled,
how could one me with one you equal two,
yet one multiplied once not remember two
nondual co-arising 1 PositiveConvex = NotNot (0) Concave,
Eulerian Prime Relationship
within multiculturally unfolding/folding time as space
as speed of (0) fractal-squared fertile-root regenerating nature-spirit
of ecoconscious enlightenment?


Fuller’s Cosmic Consciousness

Said Harvard to Bucky
we feel quite so lucky
your genius on campus
has caused quite a ruckus
but this time we’re sure you’re less mucky;

And yet we’re not sure
which department could endure
your thesis exegetical
your wisdom eisegetical
of what is and is not we’re less sure.

Perhaps you’re a poet
and the last ego to know it,
you thought this was science
mixed up with con-science,
your poetic verse helps you show it.

When Bucky wrote meta-physical science
we read him as physical conscience
and that could be fine
it fits with his rhyme
of teleopathic resonance.

There once was a Fuller who prehended
a Special Case universe co-prehensile
teleopathic embrace
wears polypathic face
as wisdom’s synergetic eco-tensile.



When we see regenerate systemic structure,

Then we know regenerative prime function,

of time and relationship,

of space and sequential proportion,

of polyculturing revolutions

devouring monocultures in warm synergetic baptisms.


When we know regenerative primal function,

We learn to hear regenerating frequencies,

We fear unregenerative force,

We evolve  faith-praxis through ReGenetic Intelligism,

(oops, did I say that out loud?).


When we evolve multisystemic orthopraxis through ReGenetic Wisdom

Then we mentor co-regeneration,

mutual evolve-informing subordinate,

reiterative listening and syncing,

positive generous timeliness,

in Basic Attendance spaciousness,

diastatic lungs and heart and consciousness

in peace-radiant love with Earth’s unfolding song and dance.


+/-Eulerian + RNA 4-Based Binomial Geometric Evolutionary Logical,

Ecological and Biological,

and Regenerative Nuclear Linear-Polar String Revolving 4-equi-dimensional

thermodynamic and electromagnetic prime relationship balance,

where +Polynomial = -(-)Polynomial Open Hierarchical Balanced MultiSystemic Information Win-Win Assumption.


See Buckminster Fuller on prime tetrahedral revolving dynamic evolution of spacetime,

fractal information as energy,

(0)-sum Core Vector [convex] OVER Core Vortex [concave].

And also consider a post-millennial revision of cultural Taoism

so Yang = +1 QBit, as

Yin = (-)-1 QBit, and

Permaculturing Tao = +/(-)- Prime Fractal Ergodic 0-soul Theorem (Gregori Perelman, et. al.)


Youth ReGenesis EcoMinistry Project

Doctor of Ministry Proposal, Hartford Seminary

Gerald Dillenbeck, M. Div., MPA, PDC


O Thou who created the universe

And all that we see on our planet,

We worship your pulsating presence

In all that you have made

And all you have made is in you.

M. T. Winter, p. 166, 2009


The 10-Story Elevator Speech Summary:

The Youth ReGenesis Project is

an inter-religious EcoMinistry retrovirus

with abundant sustainable intent

toward a deeply, and gratefully, and graciously prime rooted

PermaCultural Metaphysics,

with Positive Deviance natural/spiritual In/ExFormation Balance,

Open Whole System Group Theory

(0)-soul Vertex/Vortex Assumption,

with highly synergetic, and healthy, bountiful string-growth trajectory

toward what we have already absorbed through past generations,

with co-prehensile and comprehensively mindful gratitude.



To join inter-religious youth EcoMinisters together;

to explore, discuss, discern, and comprehend more deeply

into a shared ReGenesis of spiritual and natural systems;

deep seeding a resilient and sustainable growth

toward an abundantly incarnated, inclusive, and equitable REcology of Gratitude/Grace.


Or, the Reverse Corollary: To reduce the dissonance between the Inductive (+e-frequency/function) Ecology of Grace (Right-brained message neural receptors) and the deductive (-e-frequency/function), Exegetical Economy of Law/Language/Logic (Left-brained DNA Codex receptors). Special Case Note: Only Physical Universe is available to metric/numeric systems comprehensive, transliterative, and predictive evidence confirmation.


ReGenesis Theory Vision:


Our nature-spirit Information System is optimally comprehended  through analogically transliterating the Ecology of Physical Material Values through the PermaCultured [permanently encultured] Gratitude-Values lens of Yang/Yin Balanced RE-ligious Information Codex: The Golden Rule and the Golden Ratio are restatements of +/-.50%Yang Self-Individuation = -.50%Yin Not-Polynomial “Other” Identity without  excluding Boundary [heuristically assumed to be infinitely inclusive]/2 =  0-soul Vertex/Vortex. (See Buckminster Fuller, Gregori Perelman, and Laotse).


First Stage: Urgent Need for a Climatic Trend Reversal AND Grateful-Mindful Leadership


The most gratifying attribute of cyclical and self-reproducing Living Systems is their permanence, their lack of ending. Their greatest weakness is the reverse view; there is no place in particular to begin to tell their story.


Connecticut is in disarray. Faith in the future evaporates with the aquifer, and healthy air and soil and lives. The sense of urgency, not for more random change, but for socio-economic and ecological transformation, emergently grows toward its own ominous conclusion; Business As Usual is dying.


The voluntary, and sometimes involuntary, exodus of the Millennial Generation from our places of formation–schools, temples, churches, farms, skilled labor guilds, extended families and small villages—leads to a healthy heuristic assumption that our need for urgency is sufficiently tilted toward a new “highest and best use” Search status.  As an emergent post-millennial community of (0)-Carbon Footprint Faith, perhaps we are ready to re-link (re-ligion) our PermaCultured Golden Rule/Ratio Traditions to our Left-Brain’s favorite child, Deductive Scientific Method.


The literature on organizing improvement within faith communities (and the term faithless community appears oxymoronic to anyone who has ever tried to live in the semblance of a sane community, so perhaps we can simply agree that any assembly of people deserving the appellation community also deserves to be thought of as a “faith community”) redundantly emphasizes two necessary ingredients for successful change, urgency and mindful-grateful leadership; leadership quality that is itself openly and inclusively responsive to constituents. While some emphasize urgency over effective leadership (Schaller, Macy and Johnstone, Gershon, Kotter) and others appear to emphasize  effective leadership over sense of urgency (McNeal, Bass, Schwarz, Dale, Atlee), probably we all agree that having both is optimal, and presumably necessary to sustain community spirit for revival into perpetuity.


The proposed D. Min. project topic, “Intentional ReGenesis: A Case Study in PermaCultured Youth Sustainability through EcoMinistry Formation,” is metrically and naturally rooted in Buckminster Fuller’s Theory of Regenerativity. However, it is spiritually and normatively rooted in an elaborate polycultural map. On this map, the Dalai Lama’s definition of compassion will point toward a collective sense of urgency to relieve shared suffering. Our Polyculture Map also uses the Dalai Lama’s definition of mindfulness as the necessary avenue toward an effective leadership of prehensile, enthymematic, and diastatically engorged gratitude.


Fuller’s Metaphysical metrics and predictions regarding “an eternally changeless definition of all understanding,” translated into Taoist, Buddhist, and Trinitarian terminology, offer us the heuristic assumption that the most regeneratively balanced ecology is the one that is most sustainable and resilient through transformative change. We will define this Prime Relationship Balance as:

Compassionate suffering Yin (purgative awareness) = -0 Prime-Linear Appositional Information about urgent disvalue (Ex-Formative sociopathology beliefs), AND

Mind/grate-ful mutual leadership Yang (sublimation is defined as mutual-exegetical synergetic understanding) = +1.00% Prime Binary Information System Value

In other words: Greatest Effect (Yang+e) with Least Effort (Yin-e) Balances PermaCulturally when assets/strengths are recognized as gratuitous resources to overcome our current socioeconomic pathology, or weakness. This is a Yang/Yin holistic feminist-inclusively-balanced teleological ecology.

When Yang and Yin levels within any one ecosystem, or community, are in balance, then we have an optimal environment for self-perpetuating and sustaining (regenerative) Deep Growth.  Harmonious Tao-Centered trends facilitate multi-species’ (and multi-religious Traditions’) mutual nourishment, health, and well-being. Permaculture Design and Positive Deviance (PD) principles provide a ubiquitous and deep learning ecology through the development of language steeped in natural system metaphor, metric-numeric reiterative system-pattern development, and feminist/holistic therapeutic communication paradigms (David Abram, Julian Jaynes, Laura S. Brown, Miriam Therese Winter).

Second Stage: Cooperative Symbiotic Growth v. Competitive Linear Progress Myths

The literature on effective models for managing sustainable development includes some diversity of thought about how to best measure success. Are we about the business of growing in size, perpetually, across time, continuing to grow in numbers until the individual community, or paradigm, or belief system, or language, or species has created a monoculture? This sounds uncomfortably akin to Dr. Seuss’s parable of The Lorax. Alarmingly rapid changes in climate are teaching us that this way of defining human success points toward its own ultimate demise, bringing down most of our other-species allies with us. Basic laws of thermodynamic balance remind us that if the resources we expend outweigh the resources we take in on a sustained basis, then entropy describes our future. Our community’s most sustainable growth with least dissonance to the larger ecology may best be informed by a Deep Learning read of Fletcher Peacock’s Water the Flowers, Not the Weeds.

Much of the literature on growth of communities places more emphasis on qualitative measurements of success, or effectiveness. We might think of these outcomes as the slow, natural, rooting growth toward depth; becoming embedded in sustainable root networks of diversity and mutual enrichment (Dale, McNeal, Schwarz, Macy and Johnstone). To grow as a person of faith is to grow as a mutual minister embedded in a polyculture of EcoMinistry (Eco conjoins Economy and Ecology). Effective leadership follows growth in compassion; compassion emerges through the mutuality of cooperative, mindful, grateful development and stewardship. This natural systems analogical paradigm lies at the heart of Fuller’s Metaphysics of gratitude, belonging to the Commons, Spaceship Earth, (rather than materialistic reductionism, the memes of property and ownership), and the symbiotic, precessive, relationship-co-designing/desiring, trend of self-regenerative ecosystems.

Buckminster Fuller was  interested, in his later years, in a Theory of Regenerativity. In his Synergetics and Synergetics 2 (1975, 1979), especially Synergetics 2, he may have anticipated Gregori Perelman’s proof of the soul conjecture (1994) in Mathematics’ Group Theory, assuming n-dimensional symmetric, elliptic, structural boundaries-as-Vertex/Vortex Janus-faced Relationship. Hierarchically staged (folding and unfolding) relationships in a 0-soul Core Vertex Universe are isomorphic, and therefore mutually holonic.

It is precisely this symmetrical/appositional Information Codex as normative that may have connected, for Fuller, with the issue of Special Case Information Systems as the land of Physics. Fuller defines our Whole Systems Universe as: “the integral of all metaphysical and physical phenomena.” (1075.22, 1979)  Universe as a mental place of comprehended relationship AND the Exterior Landscape of physical/natural thermodynamic laws, AND an iterative conversation of mutual teaching-learning. He summarizes the metric and rhythmic significance of Einstein’s, and his own, prehensile attraction toward an optimally satisfying Universal Field Theory as

Whereas the physical disintegrates entropically to a limit of velocity and disorder, the metaphysically operative mind displays a reverse pattern to that of physical entropy [ e.g. Not-Polynomial Time and Space mental-universe only; exclusive of Physical phenomena], wherewith to define lastingly the mind seeks the orderliness of the principles that are discovered.  As the human definitions can never be perfect [analogically holonic], the metaphysical mind of humans can only amplify and simplify the human statement of the comprehensive orderliness discovered and periodically reconfirmed by further experiences. (1052.60, 1979)


Third Stage: What is comprehensible (Polynomial Information-P) is appositional to what is proven to be Not-Polynomial Information-NP (confirmed not-real value).

Fuller believed that Polynomial Time and Space enjoy a self-perpetuating timeless P=NP equity balance. Information develops in ways that are normatively analogous to a Taoist description of Yang = +100% of Universal Natural Energy System and Yin = (-)100% of Universal Metaphysical System. Natural (Physical) systems thereby form the normative boundaries for (0) Balanced universal information system hierarchical-holonic structure.

Stored awareness of natural law boundaries within organic systems is Codex. Information Codex is bound by dimensional binary Information Balance structure, or staging, constraints of sequence and pattern, that we again discover in William Thurston’s 8-possible Prime Universes–spatial and/or temporal–in Group Theory. This Codex assumes that Polynomial Space/Time is indeed reversely equivalent to Not-Polynomial Metaphysical-Mental Codex Place/Moment Metric Systems. When that underlying assumption is supported and celebrated by our bicameral humanity, then Earth and her inhabitants improve our teleological pilgrimage trajectory toward consonant/dissonant abundant balance. Faith and hope flourish in a 4-Based Deep Econometric-Ecology, and blossom through Original Instruction Code to resist not-thriving, lack of string-resilience, increasing Problems of Incommensurability, in a bionic-binary-balanced In-forming Trans-Analogizing Metric/Linguistic Communication System.

Fuller often notes that the precessive/recessive patterns of space/time are redundantly expressed in the basic organic and sub-atomic structures of natural energy systems. Fuller’s Figure 203.09 (1975) predicts the underlying Codex expressed in the Higgs Boson, the tetrahedral 4-Staged structure of logic and trigonometry, laws of thermodynamic balance, analogy, communication, organic system regeneration (the life/death/fertilization/new-generation cycles of plants, and the 4-Season Earth-Sun Cycle Rotation,  for example), RNA, octaves, and double-bind-fractals.

Fourth Stage: Aha! Insight and Fractal Synergetic Rhythm Metrics

It is interesting to speculate that Fuller may have, at least implicitly, predicted that a Millennial Generation would PermaCulturally become aware of the implications of his Theory of ReGenerativity. Eventually, when the springtime of  human faith becomes ripe for Regenesis, we might find a successful resolution of Einstein’s pilgrimage of only relative-success, where P and NP remain winterized as not necessarily symmetrical; yet we hope they reflect Tao.

Earth, air, water, and bio-systems are overheating and moving toward entropic loss of Information organizing capacity, which will reverse after political, economic, and religious leaders recognize the abundant comprehensive power of  (0) Balanced In/Ex-Formation as both normatively and metrically balanced.[1] In other words, if it were not true that Polynomial equals Not-Polynomial Information in reverse linear, hierarchical, and fractal-staged Prime Relationship sequence, then human comprehension would not be possible.  When we comprehend (Fuller’s parallel to the Dalai Lama’s universal “mindfulness”)  that Not-Polynomial Ex-Formation, in any (0) soul Prime Rooted Information Universe, equals (-)100% of Polynomial Deductive Logic Information pattern sequence, and rhythm, humanly cognizable in the eternal/permanent inductive moment.

Fuller provides us with a reverse linear-time rhythmic projection toward our immediate Aha! Experience in Figure 1130.24, pp. 452-3, in which the Second Millennial Generation rather miraculously, maybe even heroically, embraces the fundamental laws of thermodynamically balanced gratitude, ethically and naturally and spiritually, normatively and inductively, even synaptically. An ergetic un-forming, unfolding, abundantly diastatic retrovirus reveals her “anti-matter” Not-Self=NP. Discovering her as the shy, virginal Yin Muse of GratitudeInfused Creative Synergy, the feminist, our shared Right-Hemisphere reveals -.50% of the Original Instruction Codex soul; it is Self optimizing to do no harm to Other. Yang/Yin ReGenerative dynamic equilibrium revolves a taproot back to our First Millennium’s Golden Rule, Ratio, and Elixir. Individuated-Self is to Other as Other has always been to our We-Self RNA Community String, Story, Song.

To comprehend the Commons as we would have the Commons sustainably communicate with Humans (certainly including Self), is to optimize nutritional and economic abundance, depth, and wisdom. The Commons, including metaphysically encultured pilgrimage Traditions back to our Original Instruction, teaches our teleological mission to ReGenerate Deep Ecology.


Stage Five: TrimTab Primary Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Principle of Greatest Effect for Least Effort: adhere to Golden Rule/Ratio

As mystics, polymaths, artists, architects, have been noticing from earliest shamanic proto-history to present, the greatest effect for least effort  fundamental design principle is a radically inclusive Golden Rule because we are all in this mess together (Macy and Johnstone). We literally and figuratively, normatively and metrically, nutritionally and bionically, naturally and spiritually, metaphysically and physically, are what we have absorbed from our progenitors; we absorb what is already potentiated (gratuitously prehensile, compelling, co-attracting) in the next Holonic Place/Moment.  When our Bicameral Species globally comprehends our eisegetical Internal Landscape of Graced Ecology and exegetical External Landscape are mutually reiterative[2], then Fuller predicts (and perhaps Teilhard de Chardin) a Cosmic Aha! Event. This diastatic cultural event follows the dramatic comprehension of sustainable and equitable abundance through balanced gratitude-mindfulness. Our mutual suffering emerges as the emphatic and obvious reverse of our optimized confluent wisdom. Socioeconomic pathology conjoins socioecological therapy.

Wisdom, then, recommends mutually other-optimizing intent and commitment to cooperate socioeconomically and ecologically with the Commons (these are Win-Win Game Theory strategies for outcome optimization), which is the Explicate-Order (David Bohm)  Exterior Landscape of our diverse polycultures, nutrient streams, communication systems. Grace-filled cooperative intent and practice evolves from our universally shared PrimeRoot Zero; a Deep Learning mutually-sustaining Core Vertex, liminally co-circumscribing a Feminist-Octave 4-Based Vortex.

We become abundantly sufficient, EcoMinistry balanced, when we practice our Species’ vocational trajectory back to the nutrient communication strings rejoining us to a future globally inclusive Gold-Standard Polyculture. This long-range, 8-generation, Original Instruction is now emerging through the moment-to-moment recognition of ourselves in grateful relation with Others, and SacredOther as the absorbed nutrients that In-Form “We-Self” identity.


Stage Six: EcoMinister as Dynamic We/Me Win-Win Facilitator

Christian Schwarz chooses empowering facilitative leaders as the first of his eight necessary qualities for Natural Church Development optimization. “These pastors equip, support, motivate, and mentor individuals,”…. “They do not use lay workers as ‘helpers’.” (p. 24) This is leadership operating in a cooperative transaction economy, and ecology. Capitalists and socialists, government regulators and “free” enterprise advocates alike need not apply for the role of Reverse-Millennial ReGenesis leader. Empowerment optimizes as grateful cooperation becomes equilateral, mutually initiated and received. This is a highly mindful and enriching cooperative value exchange—equal value for equal value. Enterprise is never free; there are always energy transfers in any endeavor, any change, movement, vocation, mission, business. Profit that only works one way is a distorted view; it lacks value-balance.

Leaders who realize their own empowerment by empowering others experience how the “all by itself” [TrimTab-post synergetic “gift” Yields derived from yoking GreatestEffect-TherapyStrength with LeastEffort-Pathology] principle contributes to growth. (p. 25)

Mutually empowering iterative loops are the economic-ecologists Positive Deviance way of advocating the benefits of designed-inclusion for optimizing cooperative transactions. Appreciative Inquiry (rooted in hope of mutual gratitude) within an intentionally diverse polyculture, is more likely to result in a long-term sustainably successful mutual-profit balance, than operating within a monocultural ecosystem. Positive Deviance selects for indigenous assets in response to urgent, and collectively shared, eco-pathologies. Cooperative value transfers intend win-win symbiotic value optimization—the emergent Ecology of Gratuitous/Gift all by itself Positively Deviant Evolution. This is the kind of reality that sounds like our most abundant purpose is to grow in mutual compassion and gratefully inclusive mindfulness, of “WeSelf” co-prehensile Awareness. The fruits of compassion are cooperative-oriented transactions, expressions of significant mutual gratitude relationships.

Schwarz further observes that empowering sense-builders appreciate bipolar balance between “goal” and “relationship” orientations. In his theological paradigm, too many of us are either imbalanced toward a technocratic Me-faith (YangSpirit) or a spiritualistic We-hope(YinSpirit).  It is the adept religious leader who is able to consistently self-and-other empower, keeping both her faith-in-self-optimization focus, and hope-for-prime-relationship development, in equipoised balance.

Our polymathic ReGenesis EcoMinister maintains an internal and external holonic landscape that compassionately reflects gratitude for self as part of other, through hope for other as part of self; a combination of the Golden Rule and the enthymematic solidarity-awareness that “we are all, most-gratefully, in this together.”  This is a solidarity that echoes the sacramental marriage bond, having a double-bind synergetic intent—but applied universally, radically, inclusively, embracing all species and all of nature.

Our millennial Positive Deviance facilitator transliterates the symbol-patterns within and between self and other during an inclusive pilgrimage toward a mutually re-discovered Universe of ultimate co-passion. This sounds like a good love thing. But, is this theology supported by what we discover in natural patterns of healthy development? This, after all, is the infrastructural analogy behind Schwarz’s thesis; we are an In-formation Bicamerally-Coded Language-string-reiteration Species of perpetually reincarnating nature-Events. He implies that  spiritual and/or metaphysical information is morphologically comprehended through recognition of incarnated natural elements, confluent and dissonant symbols, value exchanges, and their systemic relationship patterns, development sequences and stages. These natural elements are in dynamic evolutionary relationship, so we can notice nature’s patterns to improve understanding of our regenerating Universe, and perhaps vice versa.


Stage Seven: Deep-Rooting PermaCultured EcoMinistry

The ReGenesis Project vision is that we are already an emergent Species of quasi-cooperative EcoMinister wanna-be’s. This Turning Point Generation faces a uniquely critical opportunity and is potentiated for this socioeco-equity transitional moment. Our hypothesis is that grace-filled apprehension toward a holistic teleological self- and world-view is more prominent within the Reverse-Bi-Millennial-ErgeticCusp Generation, and their PermaCultured RetroPositive Deviant elders. Further, our Project goal is to accelerate and democratize this Deep Grace/Gratitude Ecology through a variety of Dynamic Facilitation interreligious and secular youth leadership development venues. If we model a regenerative, dynamically inclusive process of Appreciative Inquiry, then the medium of dialogue will naturally revolve toward a mutually-held plan for regenerative Self-People-Earth development, with diverse paradigmatic applications—economics, creative design information technology, neighborhood revitalization, holistic health care, Time/Space v. Moment/Place autistic bipolar-affective dissonance therapy, Deep Learning pedagogy, green technology development toward 0 carbon footprint, improved non-violent communication practice, child, youth, and family well-being CQI policy reform, and public discernment/dialogue choice-making.

The Positive Deviance (PD) concept is based on the observation that in every community or organization there are a few individuals or groups whose uncommon but successful behaviors and strategies have enabled them to find better solutions to problems than their neighbors who face the same challenges and barriers and have access to [the] same resources.


The PD approach is a problem solving, asset-based approach grounded in the fact that communities have assets or resources they haven’t tapped. 

Basic Field Guide to the Positive Deviance Approach, http://www.positivedeviance.org


Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is a method for studying and changing social systems (groups, organizations, communities) that advocates collective inquiry into the best of what is in order to imagine what could be, followed by collective design of a desired future state that is compelling and thus, does not require the use of incentives, coercion or persuasion for planned change to occur.

Gervase R. Bushe, “Appreciative Inquiry,” http://www.wikipedia.org


Both Appreciative Inquiry and Positive Deviance are community-improvement oriented systems models. Both easily fall within the Interior and Exterior Landscape vision of Permaculture Design, as well as Positive Psychology, and Fuller’s Holistic Teleology. AI and PD (which we will stipulate as a symbol for both Positive Deviance and Permaculture Design) actively search for the strengths currently indigenous to the community, or polyculture, to optimize these untapped  resources for sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement. This is precisely what Christian Schwarz recommends to strategically bolster the faith community’s greatest weakness. Respond to system weakness by strategically focusing BusinessAsUsual- Deviant strength-nutrient out-lyers.

Achieving the greatest effect with the least effort is, perhaps, the prime principle of Permaculture Design. Designing for synergetic development by intentionally working with natural systemic assets, positive deviance, is efficient, and the most sustainable option among those available at any given time.  Appreciate Inquiry and Dynamic Facilitation are public dialogue technologies designed to include affected, effected, and infected constituencies as diversely as possible in discovering the Positively Deviant resources already indigenous to the choice-making community.  These PD resources are the dialogue population’s most under-employed, most richly-potentiated, asset toward a consensus solution of value. Consensus is limited only by the sufficiency of listening deeply to the diversity within the polyculture.   The more diversity within the active polyculture, dynamically drawn-into the effective dialogue environment, the more sustainable the solution—rather like adding tangy yogurt to warm milk, to diastatically regenerate the milk into an optimized population of yogurt.

Schwarz (logically confluent with Fuller, and Macy and Johnstone) refers to the economy of grace, or gratitude, as the all by itself principle; the emergent outcome of system regeneration. Abundant fruition, or fertility, of a system is not only greatest effect with least effort, it is also the evidence of what Buckminster Fuller calls emergent precession. Metaphysical precessions and all natural precession trending systems comprehend, or culminate, in a fractal moment of regenerative intent, given sufficient urgency and an adroitly facilitated Appreciate Inquiry learning culture. Precession is positive trend toward syntropy, synergy, forming symbiotic, confluent, harmoniously intricate networks of patterned relationship. Positive Deviance may be what natural teleologists recognize as Original Meaning or Golden Rule-Original Instruction.  Regardless, the taproot of comprehension brings further nourishment to the Original Meaning of enthymematic gratitude—now, also the all by itself intuitive effects of grace, or teleological gift, bounty, extra, optimized abundance within any system, paradigm, universe. Grace is what creation adds to learning; new identity adds to authentic self-articulation; care-giving mutual intent adds to the norms of belonging and nutrition and therapeutic practice (see Brown).

A great deal of Fuller systems comprehension turns (literally and figuratively) on understanding his binary map for transliteration between the Interior Landscape (Metaphysical Universe) and Exterior Landscape (Physical Universe).

System insideness and outsideness means two congruent, concave-convex systems, four corner-defining ins, and their four opposite windows through which the omnidirectional out nothingness is revealed. The eight were there all the time. The fourness of self and the fourness of otherness = comprehension. Comprehension involves tuned-in octave resonance as well as omnidirectional and local angular integrity. (268.02, 1979)


Systems are aggregates of four or more critically contiguous relevant events having neither solidity nor surface or linear continuity. Events are systemic. (400.26, 1975)


PD ReGenesis, whether Physical or Metaphysical, is trending toward better balance, toward both increased consonance and her Non-Polynomial Corollary, decreased dissonance.


Stage Eight: Youth EcoMinistry Pilgrims follow our ReGenesis Metric and Economic Value Story


A world of peace and prosperity

For all inhabitants of planet Earth


And will

Come to fruition

Through rock-solid relationships.


Cross-cultural and interfaith relationships,

Personal and social relationships

[Economic and ecological relationships,

Natural and spiritual relationship,

Yang and Yin relationship

Day and Night relationship

Prediction and Reverse-Membering relationship

Explicate and Implicate Order relationship

Diastasis and Metanoia

Seeing and Tasting

Deduction and Induction

Alpha-Based Deductive Reasoning[3] and Holonic Feminist, Creative Learning, Nurturant-PayItForward Cooperative, EcoMinistry, Intentional Community of Gratitude [and Song/Oral Re-Telling] Ecology[4]

Quantum and Ex-formation relationship]

Are ways whereby we replicate

Our relationship with

The Divine.


Relationship is a succulent and savory fruit

Of our quantum Spirit.


The proof is

In the experience.



Invites us

To taste


M. T. Winter, p.167, 2009, with some analogically creative liberties



This Youth ReGenesis EcoMinistry D. Min. Project begins with two Core Teams: an Interior Landscape (Metaphysics/Math) Team and an Exterior Landscape (Physical/Ecology) Team.

Both Teams will follow a Deep Learning path that explores Synergetics, Positive Deviance, Appreciative Inquiry, Non-Violent Communication, and Permaculture Design Principles. A second generation of Youth-led Teams will follow the combined work of these Core Teams, folding core findings into additional religious spirit- and nature-based languages and paradigms. For example, in what ways do the Eastern meaning and context of gratitude v. material objectification parallel (and appear dissonant with) the Abrahamic Myth-ecology of grace v. law, female v. male, Yin v. Yang, Wisdom v. Word, GraceCreation v. Structured Codex balance-issues?

How might these confluence/dissonance trends be further analogically enriched, or questioned, by Fuller’s understanding of ergetic, gravitational, function within a dynamically repercussive Metaphysical/Physical, recessive/precessive, implicated/explicated, Ex-formed/In-formation, NotPolynomial/Polynomial Space and Time Universe?

What, if anything, does the ReGenesis of Self Care, People Care, and Earth Care as 3 sides of a (0) soul Center have to do with my WeSelf Individuation, our WeSelf EcoMinistry intentionally inclusive vocation toward positive gratitude-nutrition-thriving cooperative outcomes, and my Natural HomePresence [Physically In-carnated] future?

The Metaphysics/Math Team, from secular and religious schools, and youth groups, will explore the hypothesis:

The universe is optimally comprehensible, and valued, when (0) Soul Vectored, thermodynamically and informationally equipoised.

Fuller’s geometry, mapped onto the Group Theory work of William Thurston and Gregori Perelman, defines (0), soul, vector, universe, and regenerative system.

CQI Standards: Report responds to the Clay Math Institute’s Challenge: Does Polynomial equal Not-Polynomial?

2.  The Exterior Landscape Team will explore a teleological hypothesis, from http://www.neweconomicsnetwork.org:

The purpose of an economic system is to organize human activities in ways that support healthy and resilient…ecosystems for both present and future generations.

If both hypotheses 1 and 2 are True, then the 1st hypothesis may work as an analogical definition of :

•           integral mindfulness, personally, bio-ethically, and as a species; Beyond Religion, Dalai Lama;

  • an eternally changeless definition of all understanding; B. Fuller;

•           the Tao of Yang/Yin self-perpetuating and –defining Prime Relationship (0); Taoism;

•           the regenerative development of a Deep Learning Ecology, in Permaculture Design and Positive Deviance design/planning practice;

•           a new human species awareness of our universally recycled nature’s soul as Prime Relationship (0) = E/e² (Fuller, Euler) and 1/0 = Yang/Yin = P/NP = Me Individual-CoreVertex/We Identity-CoreVortex.


•           If Fuller’s belief that a comprehended metaphysical infrastructure, meeting his optimized TrimTab design specifications, is correct,

•           If the Youth ReGenesis Project is able to seed that comprehension through publishing a satisfactory response to the Clay Millennium Math Problem of  Polynomial Versus Not-Polynomial equity conjectural proof,

•           If Fuller’s Theory of Regeneration can be comprehended accurately as a (0) Soul Core-Vector Conjecture, then both Fuller and Stephen Cook predict globally transformative implications.

Then, Locally:

  • At least $1 million in cash award from the Clay Math Institute, to be reinvested in sustainability outcomes, potentially leading to $10 million in annual transaction values within 5 years, and $100 million flowing through a global PD cooperative financial investment stream, within 10 years.
  • Extensive lawn to organic edible landscape conversions; urban bicycle/pedestrian transportation infrastructure.
  • Sustainable and resilient, robust, ReGenesis Permaculture Design/Positive Deviance cooperative industry, vocations, formational and well-being strategies, financial support, regenerative evolution.

And Globally:

  • More dancing in circles; less marching in squares.
  • Holonic ReEco-Ligion: (0) Soul Teleological Original Gold Value Standard of PermaCultured Metaphysics and Mythology
  • Symbiotic Deductive/Inductive Deep Creative Learning Ecology of Gratitude/Grace
  • Unitarian Universalists embrace Buckminster Fuller in a more comprehensive way, and perhaps other religious traditions as well, the result of a universal field theory that conjoins (re-ligions) math, science, ethics, nature, communication, (+)in/(-)ex formation, and spirituality.




Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous, Vintage, New York, 1996.

Atlee, Tom, Empowering Public Wisdom: A Practical Vision of Citizen-Led Politics, Evolver Editions, Berkeley, 2012.

Bateson, Gregory, Mind and Nature, E. P. Dutton, New York, 1979.

Bird, Warren, (Ed.), Wisdom from Lyle E. Schaller, Abingdon, Nashville, 2012.

Brown, Laura S, Subversive Dialogues: Theory in Feminist Therapy, Basic Books, New York, 1994.

Dalai Lama, Beyond Religion: Ethics for a Whole World, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston-New York, 2011.

Dale, Robert D, Leadership for a Changing Church: Charting the Shape of the River, Abingdon, Nashville, 1998.

Fuller, R. Buckminster, Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, MacMillan, New York, 1975.

Fuller, R Buckminster, Synergetics: Further Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, MacMillan, 1979.

Gershon, David, Social Change 2.0: A Blueprint for Reinventing our World, Highpoint, W. Hurley, NY, 2009.

Kuhn, Thomas S, The Road Since Structure, University of Chicago, 2000.

Kuijsten, Marcel, (Ed.), The Julian Jaynes Collection, Julian Jaynes Society, Henderson, NV, 2012.

Lin Yutang, (Trans.), The Wisdom of Laotse, Modern Library, NY, 1948.

Macy, Joanna & Chris Johnstone, Active Hope: How to Face the Mess We’re in without Going Crazy, New World Library, Novato, CA, 2012.

Mann, Alice, Can Our Church Live? Redeveloping Congregations in Decline, Alban Institute, Inc., 1999.

McNeal, Reggie, Missional Communities: The Rise of the Post-Congregational Church, Jossey-Bass, SF, CA, 2011.

Norton, Robert & David Brenders, Communication & Consequences: Laws of Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.

Peacock, Fletcher, Water the Flowers, Not the Weeds, 2nd Ed., Open Heart, Quebec, 2001

Pierson, Phillip M., The Metaphysics of Buckminster Fuller: How to Let the Universe Work for You, Phillip M. Pierson, 2014.

Ripley, George, Compound of Alchymy, 1471.

Schwarz, Christian A., Natural Church Development,  (7th Ed.), ChurchSmart Resources, Emmelsbull, Germany, 1996.

Thich Nhat Hanh, The Art of Communication, [which is also about the art of optimizing nutritional Yields in an Ecology of Gratitude], HarperOne, NY, 2013.

Winter, Miriam Therese, Paradoxology: Spirituality in a Quantum Universe, Orbis, NY, 2009.


[1] See Fig. 505.41, for a 4-Season view of In-Formation and Ex-Formation—temporal dimension reverse circuited, or implicate ordered, as per Bohm.

[2] Mutual reiterative feedback loops between Universe and Self, or any two or more variables, are what Fuller understands as a “precession” trajectory toward a synergetic event. Precession is co-prehensile, an attraction toward mutual gift, grace, gratitude, and, probably follows the energy metrics of gravitational pull, as compared to radiantly Ex-forming energy.

[3] See David Abram and Julian Jaynes on linguistic/logic/deductive Left-Brained dominance and the concomitant NotSoPermaCultural developments, starting just about 2,000 years ago.

[4] Please see Buckminster Fuller on the teleological significance of virginity and ex-formation in regenerative systems (e.g., #1076, 1979)



Regenerative Communication Systems: PermaCultured Design and Development Theory

Science is to Metaphysical Systems as Information is to Communication Systems:

As Perelman’s Soul Theorem is to Thurston’s  Geometrization Theorem, 4-base assumption

Professor Max Tegmark, of the Physics Department, MIT, in Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014), hypothesizes that the Universe is mathematically designed.  Development, but not evolution, follows metrically predictable, and repetitive, patterns. William Thurston’s 8 Geometrization Conjecture and Grigori Perelman’s Soul Theorem suggest that we might live in a Prime Relationship (0) Core Vectored self-defining ellipse, where the numeral 1 is equivalent to  1Qbit of Information in any 100% inclusive Universe. In our internal, bicameral, Information System Universe, 0 = -1 NonPolynomial Qbit in our Right hemisphere, while 0 = +1.00% Polynomial System Qbit in our Left hemisphere. Logos-Yang plays Polynomial “form” to Mythos-Yin’s Nonpolynomial Time-reversed “function”. Or, using metric language from earliest proto-history, As without, so within translates As Yang, so Yin, and as Yin+Yang within our successfully communicated bicameral mind, so Tao (Information Binary Coded as +0/-1) without.

Applications of this globally emerging theory of Regenerative Communication System Development include a deductively accessible value standard for sustainable spiritual, economic and ecological development; communication improvements for nonviolent listening, speaking, pedagogy, health service delivery, and living; design implications for “choice-making” and Wisdom Councils, and a cooperatively inclusive balance of power, energy, values, and nutrition, more generally.

A chicken or a duck is a mistake, when you do swan lake.

Funny Girl, Bob Merrill

“Legein,” from the Greeks, means to permeatively bind, to incarnate, impregnate, involve, create, inform, enact, cause to systematize, to pattern, to grow, to enculture.  Legein is to mythos as rhetoric is to logos. Religion may be linguistically rooted in RheLegein : to reincarnate, to ritualize, to reenact, to iconize, to sacramentalize, to rebirth, to re-create, to re-member, to synergize, to recall our regenerative species-memory. Prior to the Cartesian severance of the Physics Department from the Metaphysics Department, religious experience included mental, mathematical, and physical reformation, regeneration, synchronization, synergization; a journey that followed confluence across all paradigms.   The diastatic empowering heart of religion propelled our synergetic creation story toward our confluent future paradise.

In this millennium new questions about the relationship of cognizable reality and mathematical structure are seeping into our culture. If the study of Physics can be reduced to the study of mathematic systems, where does that leave us about understanding God, and what would we mean by Religion? What mathematical system could also be a religious system?  Could a Perpetually Regenerating Systematic Theology meet exegetical gold standards for future exploration, research, creativity, learning, wisdom? If we can get that far, with some bicamerally organized reality help from Julian Jaynes, psychologist, then we might conclude with a permanently encultured (PermaCultured– think of permeating yeast, enzymes, awareness) Information System in which Polynomial Time is Non-Polynomial Time in reverse awareness sequence, using a 4-Based spatial assumption.[1]  Whether this narrative journey on a very PermaCultured Communication string results in a Black Swan or an Ugly Duckling, or probably both, will undoubtedly require extensive further exploration.

I am not sure of our journey’s trajectory if, at the end of the day, our Creation Story is a Math System Development Story.  I have trouble imagining that Story as a regenerative journey toward, well….toward anything, or anywhere.  Quantum physics theory is turning its epistemological back toward Form to embrace inscrutable Metric Function, processed by a Bicameral Communication System (that would be us chickens, working together to get all our eggs in just the right nest).  Will Universal Love be Value Binary Coded As 0, so 1, and as -1, so -0? While all that may very well be both real and true, as Tina Turner opines What’s love got-ta do with it!?

External Physical and Metaphysical Information Systems

The re-incarnation of Physics into its old home, Metaphysics, under the rubric of a universal metric system, is currently well represented in the New York Times Bestseller Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality (Knopf Doubleday Publishing), by Max Tegmark, Ph.D., professor of cosmological theory at MIT. Tegmark’s theory is that the universe is mathematic structure; perhaps Form over Function, or maybe even Form as Function. While the thesis is advertised as potentially revolutionary, and I expect it is, the premise goes back to the days before math and metaphysics were handed their divorce papers by epistemologists and scientists.

In Taoism, for example, Yang plays the leading role of Form while Yin plays her silent, implied, tacit role of Function. She is the Earth Mother who knows how to get stuff done, quietly, while Mathematicians measure, and re-measure our static Forms. The conjoining of this binary Pair opens the door toward calculation. Mathematicians calculate; the rest of us think life is for living, not so much for measuring.

The vast majority of our Math-as-Metaphysics: Metaphysics-as-Math historical tradition went by the wayside with the advent of the Industrial Revolution and contemporary scientific method. Religion is that part of Metaphysics that focuses on the beginning and end of our Creation Story. We look for explanations, predictions with proof (spelled logically consistent with all known experience) about how our Story started, and how it might end, and why, and how to predict what happens next.  It turns out there are perhaps an infinite number of possible numeric/quantitative systems. So which metric system are we living in? Does it evolve, revolve, end vaguely in dissonant irrationality?

How did this metric system get started? Is this system bound by structural laws? If not, then what sense can we make of an unstructured system, and if it does have structural pattern, then why is it this pattern, and not some other pattern? And by the way, can we get that pattern in wallpaper, or the other way around?

Perhaps we are overdue for a post-quantum cultural resurgence of reality is math, and vice versa. However, some of Tegmark’s fellow physicists are concerned about whether his proposal to re-marry Physics and Metaphysics as a Universal Mathematics Field (or Manifold, or Boson, or Set, or System—depending on your frame of reference) may be no more than an anachronism worthy of the label superstition or, perhaps worse, magic, or even, dare I mention the word,…myth.

One of Tegmark’s strengths is his capacity to include his reader in his own development story. He wants us to know that he was able to write his metaphysics while drawing his paycheck from the Physics Department.  However, his decision to publish Our Mathematical Universe may be something of an ugly duckling move by a swan in the chicken coop. Meanwhile, Tegmark continues with his revolutionary egg, calmly laid with candor. “If you can lay your egg while those around you are losing theirs and blaming it on you….”

Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

Physical structures are explicated mathematical structions[2], the law and order of syntax. These structions are sometimes longer, sometimes shorter, “formed” energy frequencies. Forms are diastatically infused with boundary-pattern frequencies. Deviance (dissonance) is allowed, but when it reaches a critical threshold of frequency, then it trends in a complex direction.  Explicated, as we find it in Physicist David Bohm’s work, is on the without side of Form, with Implicated syntax-frequencies on the within side. Buckminster Fuller, in his Synergetics, uses the geometric definition of convex for “explicated,” and concave for “implicated.” When my mental picture has me standing in God’s position, outside the physical bubble, then the stuff of Physics is concavely implicated within my crystal egg. This is the perspective of the Greek god/esses peering at us from Sirius.  When I go back to imagining myself as Gerald Oliver, then physical structures are convexly explicated—they stand out from a background Manifold, like the sky, for example.

In this view of an egg within a space-bubble, Physics and Metaphysics can be perceived as a 3-dimensional Binary appositional spectrum, with the Physics Core being the explicated egg, and the Metaphysics Boundary of our Universe being the implicated Progenitor of our Mathematical Syntax, a Universal Bubble[3] that has a great deal to keep in Form-Function balance lest the entire Bubble collapse.

What we notice with our sensory receptors are explicated, or Formed, energy structures with steady-state, Business-As-Usual, energy function patterns. This pattern and flow equilibrium is predicted to continue, until something changes.  When we have the power to predict a change, then we can explain why it happened.  However, when we cannot predict a change in Business As Usual, this is the problem that erupts with speciation (in evolutionary theories), and revolutions, and disease, and death, and fusion, and regeneratively sustained change.  However, our incapacity to predict continuation of Formed function v. systemic change may follow a Function syntax-pattern that can be predicted through Bayesian trend analysis.

Physical Bosons (Bosons equals Set in Group Theory, and system in In-formation Theory) that are closest to the energy-frequency Balance center of any Group, are those with well-articulated, comparatively stable, boundaries, or skins such as solids, then organisms. Liquids are a mid-range between solid-frequency functionality and gaseous frequency. Plasma is the Boundary-frequency syntax between Explicated functions and Implicated Systems, or Groups.  When we look at plasma within a Boundaried System, like blood, then it flows like a liquid.  Unboundaried plasma acts like a gas. Once we arrive at gaseous frequencies, including unboundaried plasma, we are looking before and within the Boundary Information skin toward the ultra-frequencies of the NonPolynomial, implicated, Order. This is the enthymematically embedded metaphysical function of ExFormed Struction. Quantum (think UnFormed and OutFormed and enthy-memed) quarks and leptons usher us into the ExFormed Function side of our mathematical rainbow, heading toward dark matter and the Great Black Hole.

In other words, what we perceive with our sensory receptors, staying as far away from the Black Hole of Religious Study and Metaphysics as possible, are geometric Group Theory instructions. Anyone who is really good with origami might be able to sort all this out. The within, concave view of Fuller’s Spaceship Earth is a memory boundary of ExFormed space (1979, pp. 120-122).  This is familiar.  It does not seem quite revolutionary, in the sense of being without significant metaphysical precedent.

In a section of Synergetics 2, entitled “Special Case: Energy and Information” (1979, p. 446), Fuller describes energy as ExFormed information; and information as explicated-only energy.

An energy event is always special case….Metaphysical includes all the experiences that are excluded by the definition of physical.  Metaphysical is always generalized principle.

            Physical is always special case. Energy is physical [Formed] and always special case. Information is always special case. Energy is information: information is energy. Special case is always realized by its energetic information. Dimension is unique frequency information. Time incrementation is special case information.

Finally, Fuller arrives at the point where perhaps he would have more effectively started, “Concept is general [ExFormed]: information is quantitative (special case) [InFormed].” Just as mythos is conceptual and qualitative and implicated; logos is informational and syntax-bound and quantitative (Boundaried, Labeled, Languaged, Incarnated).

Translating Fuller into Tegmark’s Universal Hypothesis: Information structures are mathematical structions, or confluence-rules, special case.  The implied corollary: non-mathematical structures are irrational, chaotic, dissonant, oxymorons, and metaphysically anti-Formative.  These are the Mathematician’s Ugly Ducklings and also, perhaps, in special cases, the prime relationship Black Swans of our Re-Membering Story.

Blending Tegmark with Fuller:

What Is (Explicated, standing inside our Physics egg, looking outward toward the plasmatic Boundary between the outside of the egg and the inside of the surrounding gas-bubble Manifold): Special Encultured (think enzyme,yeast, embryonic, diastatic, aptic awareness, or affinitive-energy), Boundaried Energy = Polynomial (P) Information System; a rational ellipse, in Group Theory. Polynomial Information is a functional smooth-structured, symmetrical confluence-syntax, that can predict an outcome in Real Time. Physical events are Special Case rational ellipse events.

What Is Not (Implicated, still within the Egg perspective, but taking a peek beyond the Boundary, toward astrology): Mythos/Conceptual Affinitive[4] Exformed (Not Boundaried) System = Not Polynomial (NP) Information.

In other words, NP = -(P) + P. The Physics Department lies within the Metaphysics Department. The Information in our egg is encoded, it is predicated in unfolding confluent-syntaxed predilections, instincts, within the egg’s RNA. But, until the chick hatches, that Code is exformed—enthymematically potentiated, but without any individuated systemic “START DATE” until actually fertilized, encultured, created, alive, looking back at you, and not part of a scrambled egg sandwich.

Like Fuller, Tegmark also has a Special Case: Physical Universe hypothesis.

External Reality Hypothesis: There exists an external physical reality completely independent of us.

Here is where Tegmark’s Special Case parts company with Fuller’s, in the way they each understand Metaphysics.  For Fuller, the Physics Department of our cognitive coding embryo shares a (0) Core Vector within the Universe-as-Metaphysics Department . Our Prime Core Egg acts like a Lie Group, in Sophus Lie’s theory of continuous transformation groups.  It is smooth-structured and dense with enculturating, incarnating, regenerating ExFormed Syntax. ExFormation is Information in reverse temporal sequence. ExFormation is liminal Boson-definition.  It negatively defines each Boson like a confluent system of functional molds surrounding a cognitive “Mass Gap” filled with affinitive-frequency ExFormed pattern.  (0) Core Vector Physical Universe lies within an enveloping, revolving, elliptically balanced, Metaphysical Bubble, and travels through our Bicameral Species Memory Processer, looking for home.

If he were still with us today, post Higgs Boson discovery, Fuller might replace Bubble with Ergetic Inductive-Information Boson.  Synergetic is propulsion toward a synaptically fusing event, as ergetic is implosion toward an aptic, enthymematic non-event. This is a new verse in the Nature abhors a vacuum logos. But, in reverse of course. Information adores Enthymematic ExFormation, as Yang adores Yin; as an inhaled breath yearns for the exhale to complete. The egg bears an enthymematic relationship to the duck, the chicken, the swan, and all God’s creation. A without, looking-back-inside, view of our (-P) Exformed + (P) Information Universe requires imagining the egg wombing the chicken-Code within, Advent waiting to regenerate what has always been, the mystic waiting to reincarnate IAM.  As a Universe we are awash in ExFormed Code Language; enthymematic and patient hope, wrapped around affinitive Logos.

The Quantum Physics Department, like the entire Metaphysics Department is measured with temporal frequency calculation. All evidence to date, including Einstein’s work, supports the hypothesis that Physics is not completely independent of temporal frequencies.  Quite the contrary; Physics is completely immersed in revolving wave patterns.  Ultrasound frequencies and black light, Xrays, and QBism and Black Holes, Gravity and Micro Waves, all softly boundary the Special Case of Physics, looking outward toward Metaphysical liminally boundaried, dissonantly boundaried, negatively boundaried ExFormation.  These are all negative, or Reverse-Temporal-System perception issues, as are our Creation, Evolution, Metric, Information, and Time paradigms.

If we go with Fuller, then metaphysics is distinguishable from the Special Physical Sub-Department, but not completely separate, by any means.  In fact, Physics and Metaphysics are affinitively bound together, appositively positioned, as plus to minus, white to black, Other to Self. Form and Function, Physics and Geometry, are Binary Prime Relationships. They, and we, need each other to create, develop, learn, grow, evolve, articulate, nuance, regenerate.

Fuller, born into what is now the Unitarian Universalist Society, frequently reminds his usually overwhelmed readers “Universe is the integral of all metaphysical and physical phenomena.” (1979, p. 446) Integral has a mathematical systemic meaning to him that includes the idea of synergy as mutually-defining and self-perpetuating appositional Prime Relationship. Meta-Physics is Ultra-Physics, and Physics is Not-Ultra-Physics. Metaphysics is ExFormed and inclusively enthymematic Not-Physics.  Metaphysics is like Ununoctium, a necessary ingredient for a Physicist to patiently prepare her Higgs Boson Advent Table for her faithful, and thirsty, Mother Hydrogen.

Internal Physical and Metaphysical Communication Systems

If the Universe is a (0) Core Vectored Physical Center within a Metaphysical Boson, then what about God and freedom, justice and love, passion and enlightenment, and our Creation Story?  Do our religion scholars need to learn their math and logic then go back to Re-Accounting vocations?

Perhaps there is reason to hope and to rediscover faith in Grigori Perelman’s soul conjecture proof. Perelman, with considerable help from William Thurston, Richard Hamilton, and the entire Geometrization community, was the mathematician credited for proving the Poincare Conjecture; to paraphrase, If and when we are not all in this together, with optimized confluence, then we run into a whole lot of dissonance, confusion, and loss of energy.

Turns out it all has to do with prime temporal frequency waves that form octaves and function in fractal event units.  Maybe.  But, this most clearly is the case if the Universe is appositionally symmetrical (Prime Binary Relational); if Yang-values equal Yin-values, and vice versa.  Perelman’s soul conjecture proof says that if a smooth-structured (no irrationality allowed), symmetrical, soul vector is surrounded by an elliptic Boundary that is isomorphic to the soul, then all possible vectors on the Boundary and within the soul vector’s positional relationships have isomorphic relationships to each other.  In other words, the relationship pattern within the soul vector is a holon of relationships between Self and Environment. As within, so without; and As without, so within.

Other versions of this isomorphic Information/Exformation pattern go back to ancient religious traditions, diversely expressed:

As above, so below; as below, so above.

If I treat Other the way Self likes; then Other and Self will treat Me the way Self likes.

Golden Ratio: If A+B is to A as A is to B, then the ratio between A and B has Golden Harmonic Value.  This is optimized confluent energy strength, or stability of the A, B, and A+B Set.

If Prime Relationship between Ellipse+soul is to Ellipse as the relationship between Ellipse and soul, then Ellipse and soul are optimally appositionally valued—all relationships are symmetrical and balanced, and no one is left out of the network.

For Fuller, because of the synergetic unity of the Universe, God is 1 (integral Universe), and soul is 0, in any Whole Universe Information System.  However, if the soul Vector is (0), then it does not matter what even numeric symbol we assign the entire universe. Whether 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, or 120, isometrically submerged values and frequencies prevail at 100% confluence as symmetrically and harmoniously as the Golden Egg. It is not the numeral that is of metric interest to our Cretion Story; it is the percentage.  Integral means “1” as in 100% inclusive of all diversity.

This theological analogy is further matriculated with William Thurston’s 8-manifold rational Universe Geometrics (see, for example, Geometrization conjecture, www.wikipedia.org, for an accessible summary).  It is consistent with Fuller’s Physics as Special Case Metaphysics hypothesis to suggest there are no more than 8 possible Prime Relationship frequency structures, within any one smooth-structured Boson. We have geometric and biometric evidence that our cognizable universe is analogous to a 4-Binary-dimensioned Prime Relationship within a regeneratively evolving System.

[Polynomial Information (+) = NonPolynomial Exformation (-)] enthymematically leads to NonNonPolynomial Information (+/-) Balance [Binary Relationship is Magnetic Primal]

In fact, there is considerable scientific and Information System experience suggesting that a prime binary structural assumption is why the 8-bit Information-Byte is a standard metric design for data processors.

Thurston’s 8-fold amplification does, however, bring us to what may be Tegmark’s missing hypothesis. What about the part of Physics of greatest interest to religious studies, the within Physical?

Permaculture Hypothesis: There is an internal physical structure that is incompletely separate from us, to paraphrase Tegmark. Perma for permanent, meaning the temporal dimension extends into eternity in both directions from any chosen (0) Core moment, with backward coded as negative or 0-Binary, and forward coded as positive or 1-Binary. Culture (think yogurt, or yeast, or DNA), in a bicameral communication system is affinitive and inclusive enthymematic hope.  Enculturation is iterative Information development in this communication development theory. Communication develops from enthymematic (0) Core Vector affinitive stasis, through eisegetical hope, fulfilled in exegetically consonant faith.  Or something close to that.

Exegetical Code, in the science paradigm, is deductive, syllogistic reasoning from previously identified experiential patterns. Calculation is predicated in syntactic Information-developing process. Syllogism and logic and analogy move from enthymematically-rooted premise [Stage I] to potentially replicable experience [Stage II]; from prediction to explanation [Stage III], from hypothesis to exegesis, stamped by the scientific community as True. If we think of each paradigm as a Code Book, developing according to Stage I-III syntactic order, then RNA, the Table of Elements, the Higgs Boson, embryonic, and enzymatic communication systems all appear to self-generate using the same analogous page . Each of these Information Codes follows an incarnating, staged sequence that synergizes Formation, like bread, and babies, and stories, and faith communities.

The interface between the separate external “Other” and the bicameral internal “Me” is our science lab, where we experience, learn about, remember, code, write our memories about how to replicate our experience patterns.  This is our deductive process toward understanding and recreating our +/-(0) Prime Relationship soul, to meet Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) permaculture design standards .

The problem with Math System as WhatIs, is that it includes all possibilities without the bicameral “Me” side of the equation, my experience of that WhatIs. If Tegmark is saying that we have learned to perceive temporal frequency patterns that are most confluent with our Information Code Syntax then he describes an evolutionary sequence of  development; but that is metaphysics without interest in its soul, its heart, its Source.  WhatIs evolves, revolves, regenerates toward what, and out of what? We have left the Physics Department behind, as if it were “completely separate” from our science story, rather than the source of our Information Codex.

Un-incarnated Physics is like imagining temporal order and sequence within a non-universe without a clock, or even a cell phone. Far more interesting is the internal reality of bicameral consciousness.

Science requires the ability to grow and store and retrieve information that is internally consistent, and fits with ongoing human experience. With Fuller and Thurston and Perelman we might reasonably assume that a (0) Core Vector smooth-structured geometric system rationally and symmetrically describes our Information System, and 4-Based affinitive frequencies do seem to provide the appositional balance, rhythm, and flow of our incubating [enculturating] egg, and chicken.  However, metaphysical development is a cognitive communication process; not only a binary formed system, but also a bicamerally functioning system—at least on our better days.

In humans, consciousness is what happens within a bicameral mind. Our right and left hemispheres are a binary Information Processing System. Communication systems are what happens between bicameral minds doing the best we can to move from enthymematic Stage I through Exegetical Stage III, internally, and globally.

Religion’s roots lie in our earliest attempts to successfully engage in Information transactions. Far older than the Science Department and even the Math Department, transposing experience into symbols, mythos into logos, begins internally with taste, and externally with touch, affinity, acidity, fragrance, dissonance recognition (temporal only at first—spaciated temporal perception came along fairly late in our evolutionary journey toward speciation), sound, sight, memory storage. When we finally get to our proto-history, mythos evolves into logos with enthymematic Information transactions such as reenactment, imitation, dance, song, ritual, retelling dreams.

As Fuller tells us, science is Special Case Information Development.  “Quantum” and “Complex” and “Trend Analysis” and “Communication Development Theory” are about as close as science and statistics have taken us to date toward reiterating our bicameral Regenerative Narrative journey.  Our bicamerally-based science lab does include enthymematic, intuitive, hopeful, faithful measurement, explanation, and prediction, but has nothing to explain this useful ExFormed infrastructure.  It was always intended as a deductive-only exploration. What cannot be individuated cannot be deduced from, cannot be cognized as a thing, an event. But, just maybe, an undifferentiated concept can be hypothesized as a potentiated pattern-confluence within a grayscaled liminal Boundary.  Inductive soul-submersion back, down, within, toward the enthymematic yolk of communication is only traveled in reverse by heuristically assuming eisegetical awareness has potential truth value for other bicameral minds.

Psychologists seem to agree, at least somewhat, that inductively developed memory storage and retrieval is the land of our Right hemisphere.  The elder right-brain creates by finding affective allegorical patterns, so the Species-specific left-brain can deductively learn.   Ritual and storytelling emerged from imagining, and dreaming, probably with the emergence of our bicameral mind, from a pre-cameral sensory processor. The precameral mind (Jaynes, 1976) was, and perhaps is, unable to accomplish consciousness, as distinguished from awareness of “difference.” Our  Species’ bicameral perception developed into the capacity to synaptically translate power-source difference as “Other” when we arrived at sometime before proto-history.

The concept of Other is the (0) Core Vector for our development of Left-brained consciousness, eventually requiring metric symbology for replication, explanation, prediction purposes. What is this Other? Other began in the precameral mind as a non-aptic event, an anomaly, a difference from Power-Within AwarenessAffinitive Power-Within probably remains our Right hemisphere’s  awareness of what our Left hemisphere translates as Self, as in, So, then I said to my SelfPower, how much you wanna bet that you are nothing more than “Not Other?” To which my Right hemisphere would respond, if it had linguistic capacity, “Correct, YangSelf (P) is nothing more and nothing less, but very precisely the opposite polarity of, Yin-Not Other (NP), as zero is to one, and 100% is to +/-0%.

I expect a proper Regenerative Development System to sort out the metric system choice for optimally explaining,  predicting, and sustaining enculturation and creation values.  How else will we know our origins or what might happen next, or learn how to optimize our values for life, for freedom, for sustainability, for love?  Universe as home, as nest, as womb, as community, includes the eggshell-encased plasma running through our organic and cultural life stream; the within prime-easy nutrients of affectively-engaged, permacultured communication systems.

Left-Hemisphere: +1/-0  = Yang/Yin = SelfConsciousness/Awareness =  Inductive Enthymematic Information/Deductive ExFormation = synergetic fractal and double-binary rhythm and development flow

Right-Hemisphere: +0/-1  =  Yang/Yin  =  WithinPower/OtherPower  =  Static/Diastatic =  Ergetic/Synergetic  =  Radiant/Gravitational Pull  =  Information QBit/ExFormed Enthymematic Information-Transfer Consonant Position (0) Binary Core  =  e-Frequency 4-Base Directional Syntax/Octave Struction  Harmony Wisdom  = Logos/Mythos =  Time-AffectValue Memory Code/Prime Relationship Regenerating System  =  Equilibrious +/-  Revolution


Deductive logic structure and Codex structions are useful for remembering how to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. Information system design retells our Creation Story and History as medium is to stored message patterns (see Marshall McLuhan). We can synchronize, analogize, code linguistic and numeric development stages to help us understand and replicate and empower value development; attenuate disvalues, dissonance, disease. To do so, we need to increase the effective sustainability of Information transfers between people, paradigms, and processors .

Fuller believed that our universe, or at least our planet, and our bicameral minds, exhibit a regenerative systems optimization design; essentially syllogistic and trinitarian. Unfortunately, this is the point where most of us lose track of Buckminster Fuller. Fuller calls this Synergetic Design, but when he begins talking about design as it applies to temporal functions he has trouble avoiding long, tacitly weird, adverb/adjective narrative strings like Regenerative (0) Core Vector System Optimization Design, binary smooth-structured with 4 equal dimensions–including 1 prime-linear-only Special Polynomial Time-Revolving dimension, so that P=NP.

Our regenerative journey is a transpositional nightmare when moving from the Black Hole of Physics to the synergetic enlightenment of Metaphysics.  I find it easier to imagine in the opposite, counter-evolutionary direction, informed by the within physicist, Julian Jaynes, who worked for the Psychology Department at Princeton, but was uncomfortable when confined to the “Psychologist” box. Jaynes, the communication scientist and historical-cultural researcher, most famous for his Bicameral Mind evolutionary theory (Jaynes, 1976), was adept with perceiving analogy most everywhere. He recognized that our religious development string (journey, or Way) began in the older Right hemisphere’s aptic v. synaptic event memory syntax, and gradually shifted to Left hemisphere deductive and linguistically-coded dominance.

In the precameral mind, there was no awareness of spatial dimension. Space perception emerges as sound and sight reception become bicameral, during Left-hemisphere evolution. OtherPower Code evolved from temporal grayscaled frequency patterns to the ExFormed spaciated Forms of pitch, rhythm, movement, and eventually color.  We evolved into space awareness, and that is what Jaynes calls the consciousness available to the bicameral mind that was not available to our ancestors’ precameral aptic awareness.

Measurement and calculation evolved from Left-brained deductive logic which, in turn, evolved from normal and not-normal Right-brained wave-pattern frequencies.  Self as WithinPower becomes emergently limned, Boundaried, as an energy directional difference from Other-empowered event patterns. OtherPower event patterns were synergetically nutritious, or synaptically acidic, and yucky. Awareness, in the pre-conscious mind was (and probably still is) aptic Self-As-Not-Other-Empowered. Awareness of Other-empowered messages (not-aptic) was, and remains, a synaptic event.  But, once the bicameral communication system incorporated linguistic syntax, synaptic event memory and capacity exploded to become the new norm.

Back in Jaynes’ version of proto-history, our Species’ precameral mind was aware of “God/Other-empowered” as a synaptic memory pattern of anomalous events.  Our Left hemisphere’s self-noticing difference messages are compared to the Right hemisphere’s significant Other-empowered Code Memory. Business-as-usual aptic was whatever was not synergetic or synaptic relatedness.  Information transactions are Magnetic Value/Disvalue Relationship Events—plus for nutrient synchronization  and minus for dissonant synaptic OtherPower.

Our taste receptors, followed by touch-boundary receptors, in turn followed by sound frequency receptors could only be aware of messages they could recognize as NOT Aptic—Incoming!!!!!   Our bicameral cognitive miseries of gluttony and chaos and incommensurability and irrationality and heresy were not yet code-able.  Bicameral dissonance was precameral Powerdifference. Our Species’ lifesource  plasma evolved with a difference-triggered Prime Relationship of either 0-aptic or 1-synaptic affect.

The bicameral mind adds individuation, labeling, categorizing by temporal position and frequency and volume and rhythm and flow, physical perception, then consciousness of space and Self as spatial (not merely temporal), and spatialized time, and lifetime, mortality, communication, and religion, and history. Not always in consecutive order. The precameral mind brings us to the threshold of the Bicameral-Era taproot sprouting a new (0) Vectored Bi-Cameral enculturated string.

Split-brain research has supported Jaynes’ observation that, without capacity to learn from the Left hemisphere’s experience, we have surprising cognitive lapses due to the Right hemisphere’s linguistic blindness.  But, linguistic blindness may be the reverse side of the Right hemisphere’s love for mythos, for analogy, for temporal synergy—what mathematicians might refer to as a smooth-structured Lie Group. If handicapped by only Left visual field capacity, after corpus callosotomy, linguistic capacity is deactivated.  However, the left hand can signal recognition of an identified memory analogy, the more multi-dimensional the better, including religious metaphor. The Left-processor is linguistic and deductively directional, conscious of this event as In-Formed by past events. The Right-processor is affective and inductively directional, scanning for a “sync” between the Left-processor’s message and permissively ExFormed Boundary Codex.  Enthymematic receptor-censors operate metaphorically and analogically, syllogistically.  The Right hemisphere’s default setting is aptic, roughly translating as we’re all in this together—if there isn’t some memory to the contrary, then proceed toward heuristic exploration.

In short, affective memory storage is progenitive to deductive information, as analogous OtherPower pattern creation is enthymematic to deductive learning.  Bicameral Information Memory is a relational consciousness development history. Affective OtherPower mythic Memory Syntax liminally predicts linguistics  and religious development in human cognition.  The Left hemisphere’s role is newer, and analytically fills in the cognitive gaps, creating metric and linguistic images that feel confluent with OtherPower value and disvalue patterns. Our bicameral evolution opens the capacity to perceive that WithinPower [soul] is to Not-OtherPower, as OtherPower [ExFormed appositional relationship] is to Not-WithinPower = God. The metric relationship between  the bi-elliptical soul and God is functionally equivalent to a binary appositional (+/-), self-perpetuating, mutually defining, Prime Relationship. Speaking syllogistically, of course.

All of us bicameral swans unite in one aptic balanced-awareness flock surrounded by a revolving nest-cooperative of evolving history.  Our PermaCultured regenerating nest is Core Vectored at (0) and the string of evolution composes 100% of all Polynomial frequencies.  Half of our speciated communication system trajectory is waiting there in our Right hemispheres, the Black Swan of NonPolynomial Universe. Each Right hemisphere receives the Left-hemispheres heuristic proposal messages marked Notice? (more or less equivalent to (-U)? if you speak RNA) and compares this enthymematic message to our Right-brained Reality Storage System.[5]  The root of our incarnation, religion, language, communication, and evolution, is lodged in our precameral mind. Our Prime Root is the binary information development thread extending far back into the aptic mists of (-U) = God.

Jaynes theory of the evolution of awareness to consciousness of Self as WithinPower, then logos, then internal dialogue, then reenactment, then communication, then iconic symbol narrative, appears to be a smooth-structured reverse-journey description of moving from the study of religion toward sacred-awareness-of-timeless-aptic wisdom = +/-Harmony, when centering. Religious experience is re-enculturating, remembering, re-centering Affective-Temporal awareness. Mystic experience is enthymematic awareness of our shared, radiantly ergetic[6]  (0) Prime Relationship Vectored soul. This is where the only consciously accessible NOT-SELF soul eternally resides, quietly waiting in our Right-hemisphere’s background white-sound. Within this awareness lies developing wisdom, breathing Yin-ExFormed PowerWithin function in, and Yang-formed Permaculture Codex Half-Positive Equals Half-Negative nutrient values/disvalues out, around and through (0) Prime Relationship awareness.

Our Left-hemisphere Binary-Deductive Information Processors notice, explain, understand, predict, and write our narrative strings. These encultured, incarnated, ExFormed communication strings, are coded for synaptically high fractal frequencies upon becoming aware that “Right-brained {real=(-U)²U = +1.00%Qbit-frequency trend=pi³}” is the 50% value demarcation line meeting with “Left-brained {true=+1Yang/-0Yin Core Vector-Bicameral Assumption: Polynomial is Nonpolynomial, reverse 4-Based trended, fractal rhythm }.  This BiCameral Assumption that Left-True should be equal to Right-Reality pervades all religious traditions, a quite probably explains the underlying dynamic of enthymematic hope, which Michael Polanyi called “Personal Knowledge,” and our friends at Harvard call the “Happiness Factor,” and biologists and chemists recognize as magnetic attraction, affinitive gravity. Interior-Precameral Memory establishes syntactic norm-frequency-values: e- frequency (Eulerian) Natural Laws of Regenerative Systems Development and Design.  The Binary Information Structure underlying the Left-brain’s “True” default setting[7] is the structure of enthymematic, active, nonviolent hope, and communication. When two or more bicameral minds discover their enthymematic “True-Real” default values sync, that is the point where they have confirmed that their diverse-coded “True” messages  have achieved mutual self-defining harmony “Real” NonPolynomial awareness; this mutual enthymematic synchronization is what Jim Rough calls “Dynamic” but it may be dynamic because it includes a whole mess of high-frequency synaptic activity in the local communication system. Mutual enthymematic awareness of compatibility quickly leads to enthymematic affinity, with optimized +ConfluenceValues and minimized Negative-Dissonance Values; Permacultured +/-NutrientValue Balance.

Precameral RNA Message Receivers recognize syntactic structure as confluent, or not so much, dissonant.  Analogical syntax structures our universally aptic Pattern string[8] shared by all our organic ancestors.  Physics needs an Information System Design class to consistently define What Is, and our Bicameral Processor Network needs Communication System Development Theory to define What Is NotYet, but actively hoped for; the metaphysical nonpolynomial.

Without prejudice to Jaynes, Fuller, Tegmark, Perelman and Thurston, when I throw them a ll together, the outline of what I see in the religious study of science, and vice versa:

1. Our Continuous Quality Improvement Wisdom trend is to attend carefully to the ecological implications of Poincare’s Theorem: avoid causing dissonance for both PowerWithin and PowerWithout TRUE   PRIME PERMACULTURED RELATIONSHIP: +0/-1, WHERE -1=(-U).

As (0) within, so 1 without, and as (1) without, so (-1) within.

(0) plays the Yin role of Pregenitive Soul: NotWhatIsYet Enthymematic Radiantly-Aptic (Yin +.50%/Yang -.50%) Self Assumption,

while (1) plays the Yang-explicated role of Boson ExFormed Coding Design Ellipse (Yang +.50%/Yin -.50% = 100%  4-Dimensional Assumption: smooth-structured Group = pi=100% Value Information System

2. Coded Precameral Temporal Information frequencies are synaptic over aptic. This is spaciated time [e.g. a “long” time “ago”] Analogic Correlation Foreshadowing. Time is OtherPower/WithinPower  = 0/-1. So Polynomial Time is equivalently proportioned to Not-Polynomial Time, by reversing the magnetic polarity direction. P=NP as 0=-1 in a Binary system programmed to optimize sustainable value harmony.

3. The relative strength of religious, philosophical, humanitarian, and ecologically-aware cultures, in various historic eras, in diverse geographic areas, is either thin or dense.  That is the dissonant v.confluent ratio between PermaCultured Religious [Regenerative] Enthymematic Affinity and competing cultural myths’ explanations and predictions regarding information-value and communication system sustainability patterns .

4. Information is ExFormation in reverse temporal sequence. In other words, to predict how it all ends up for us, we re-cognize our Logos (ExFormed mutual-affinity awareness) Commandment to assume as True until proven otherwise: WithinPower future will  be analogous to how it all started for each of us, with purgative fertilization, opening to new binary QBit-0-potentiated strings of reiterated, communicated, hope.

5. We call awareness that is at least analogous to enthymematic ExFormed frequency patterns “Dream-state.” Julian Jaynes argues rather convincingly that our Proto-Historians would have made no such distinction, prior to the Left-hemispheric capacity for “consciousness.” Aptic awareness, removed from body-Boundary exigencies, may be at least metaphorically equivalent to what mystics report as “bliss.” Bliss is synaptically enthymematic, self-perpetuating, affinity within a Prime Relationship (0)-Bicameral Information Network, functioning within a continuously sustainable Regenerative Communication System.

6. Learning is systemic creation in reverse temporal sequence. To learn creatively is to recreate ourselves with inclusively balanced values. To regenerate communities, paradigms, ideas, traditions, we do the opposite of what we would do to degenerate communities, paradigms, ideas, and traditions.

7. Memory is Prediction in reverse temporal sequence.

8. Polynomial is Nonpolynomial in reverse temporal sequence.

9. Eisegetical Cultural Logos (Truth Narrative-individual and collective enthymematic awareness) incarnates Exegetical Cultural Mythos (synaptically enthymematic affinitive SpeciesMemory) in regenerative historical cycles, to become Exegetically-InFormed Logos (Orthodox, in the religion paradigm). The Golden Rule is an icon of this principle:

Permanent Mythos: My Self is and does, thinks and plays, creates and learns, as I hope we will continue toward future synergetic awareness. This is the Polynomial = Nonpolynomial Assumptive Hope, following a duodecimal systemic Golden PermaCulture Binary Rule.

10. Finally, permanently encultured (permaculture) standards for Continuous Value Improvement whole systems design and development may be rooted in The Golden Ratio:

A is to B, as A+B is to B.

Where 0 is to 1, as 0+1 is to 1 in a binary-magnetic Information System Design.

And Polynomial is to NonPolynomial, as P+(-P) is to NP.

And Information is to Exformation, as Metaphysics is to Mythos.

And Science is to Religion, as Logos is to Mythos.

Our Prime QByte Design Assumption, throughout our evolutionary journey, tracking back at least as far as Solomon, flowing full-throttled on back through our Precameral Memory Code, is:

Polynomial soul and 0, are equivalent and symmetrical reflections of NonPolynomially Integral I. beginning with Time-I AM-(0%),

II.  Mythos (-1) and 1,

III. within each of our four dimensions = 100% Polynomial Time,


IV. As within, so without. As without, so it is within.

At last this Science of Religion Swan Song is done.  Atheist and Theist each remain both Binary Information System “True” and Bicamerally ExFormed “Real”—especially in the sweetspot where they see they are reverse faces of each other, both true, depending on which direction you choose to face, forward into the future, or backward into Species’ Memory. The chicken may rest comfortably inside the egg, the U-Narrative QBit string is regenerated inside-out, backwards-forth, and full-double-octaved for eternity. The Wisdom Wonder Swan can stop waiting for her two Taoist Eggs to hatch, first Form within, then Function without, then Revolve within and without in reverse directions at the same time.  Continue until culture-alignment has been achieved. Enjoy our richly nutritious, 100% organic bliss-feast.

CVI PermaCultured QBit = +/- = 0 = -1

Where 0 equals Yang-Form, and -1 equals Yin-Function, Binary Thermodynamic Assumption, 4-Based positional Metric System.

Where awareness that optimizing harmonious values is defined appositionally as ZetaFrequency (0) Core Optimized Linear Affinitive Awareness,

and +50% Yang-SelfQuantityValuePower is equilibriously returned by -50% Yin ExFormedOtherPowerValues. Radiant ultrasound PowerWithout nutrients equilibrate to succulently dense PowerWithin nutrients, and gravitational embrace faithfully predicts propelled regeneration.

Scientific Hypothesis: We seem to die alone

Religion Thesis: But have wisely flown together in our synergetic past.

Informative Purgation: I seem to die,

ExFormed PermaCultured Sublimation: To fly forever.

Who could ask for anything more?

Kay Swift

Atlee, Tom, Empowering Public Wisdom: A Practical Vision of Citizen-Led Politics, 2012, Evolver Editions, Berkeley, CA.

Bargh, John A., Our Unconscious Mind, Scientific American, January 2014, pp. 30-37.

Bateson, Gregory, Mind and Nature, A Necessary Unity, 1979, E. F. Dutton, New York.

Fuller, R. Buckminster, Synergetics, 1975, MacMillan Publishing, New York.

Fuller, R. Buckminster, Synergetics 2, 1979, MacMillan Publishing, New York.

Jaynes, Julian, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, 1976, Houghton Mifflin, NY.

Kuijsten, Marcel, The Julian Jaynes Collection, 2012, Julian Jaynes Society, NV.

Norton, Robert and Brenders, David, Communication & Consequences: Laws of Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.

Perelman, Grigori, Proof of the soul conjecture of Cheeger and Gromoll, Journal of Differential Geometry (1994) 40 (1): 209–212, ISSN 0022-040X, MR 1285534, Zbl 0818.5305

Rough, Jim, Comparing Dialog, Deliberation, and Choice-Creating, Center for Wise Democracy, http://www.wisedemocracy.org/page13/page39/page40/page40.html.

Tegmark, Max, Math Made Flesh, Discover, December 2013, pp. 44-47.

Thurston, William, Three-dimensional geometry and topology, Vol. 1. Edited by Silvio Levy. Princeton Mathematical Series, 35. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997. x+311 pp. ISBN 0-691-08304-5 (in depth explanation of the eight geometries and the proof that there are only eight)

[1] In a 4-Based metric positional system, the Prime Set for all subsequent numerics is 1,2, and 3 tri-metric sequential function. When double-bound by 0 and 4 (4=10% in a 10-Based metric system assumption) they compose 100% of Prime Progenitive Formation in relation to all subsequent values within the metric Universe, both positive and negative. This progenitive position within a developing Binary Information System is experienced as enthymematic struction, or syntax within communication and logic paradigms.

[2] Julian Jaynes refers to logos awareness as “…the preoptive nature of consciousness….I am not now entering my lexical storehouse and selecting items to string on these syntactic structures.  Instead, I have what can best be described as an intention of certain meanings, what I call structions.” (Kuijsten, ed., p. 155,2012) A struction is a boundary-instruction, or predicated instruction.  In logic, an enthymeme fulfills this function, embedded as a syntax presupposition within a syllogism with an implicit, heuristic, or hypothesized as perhaps True, premise.  Enthymeme, then, is before-and-within-the-meme; implied-within-the-meme.  Jaynes sees these enthymemes as metaphors implied by the potential relationship within a precameral affect-structured storage system.

[3] See Fuller on Bubbles, especially p. 659, 1975)

[4] Affinitive here defined as Not-Affect stasis, distended, engorged awareness, waiting confluently in equilibrium(Jaynes, on affect v. feelings, and aptic v. synaptic)plus Precessed Position in Fuller.  Combined cognitively as what’s missing in this picture? In metrics and syllogisms, affinitive means enthymematically positioned.

[5] Recent dream research suggests that sleep deprivation can be a mental health issue due to inadequately processed enthymematic proposals since our last nap.  So I guess we process in “naptic” awareness (0)-Based Frequency.

[6] Ergetic flow is equivalent to Fuller’s precession, in geometrics. Think fused synergetic event, like a rose closing at night, then think in reverse temporal order, a diffusing-radiantly, reverse-synergetic, 3-dimensional metaphysical space-expansion event, like inhaling. I understand that space does not actually expand when the rose opens, but within my cognitive map, the rose composes a larger proportion of my spatial consciousness than it did prior to the Ergetic-flow trend.

[7] See, for example, John Bargh’s very interesting work in Psychology at Yale University, studying the difference between conscious decision making and unconscious choice making, which seems to recognize “True” signals synaptically and reflexively resistant to binary +WithinPower/-AlienPower dissonance. Jim Rough is also working with this enthymematic momentum toward balanced power values when he works with groups using a “choice-making” process, distinguished somewhat from a merely deductive decision-making process.  Dynamic Facilitation enthymematically follows confluent-trending values  toward  optimizing sustainable group communication outcomes.

[8] Pre-enculturated aptic expectation of synergetic response , in Communication Theory, is a Rhetorical Event in an enthymematic stage.  In Group Theory, enthymematic stage would translate as a pre-elliptical Binary metric system assumption of balanced +/-.  In Taoism this translates into the harmonious reversely-self-defining primal relationship Root Power  +.50% Yang/-.50%Yin.