Setting aside richly incorporated through homeless economies,
we have three political ways
to compare a population’s internal status:
a. Aboriginal populations,
b. Immigrants–sometimes appearing as multiculturing creolic waves,
c. EmPowered Natives.

Natives are aboriginals
unless a more self-centered wave of supremacist immigrants
stake and successfully defend their claim to be rightful
through mightful
or maybe even cooperatively insightful
leaving aboriginals politically,
and presumably intellectually,
and most certainly economically,
akin to neanderthals,
who were immigrants from our disowned mammalian branch
of history’s ecologically polyculturing tree.

Into the 1800s,
New England Puritan waves
referred to themselves as native Americans,
meaning not those horrible Irish,
much less those displaced,
bought and sold,
neanderthal slaves;
giving no thought at all
to aboriginal Wild and Terrorizing Indian cultures in place
in this their now nativizing home
through tools of capitalistic colonialism,
self-declaring ownership
by way of piracy,
stealing from those Original Native Americans
who thought we owned Earth to care-give and care-receive
in cooperative Common.

We confuse supremacy of native cultures
with immigrant status of EastEuropean White MaleDominant
“Christian” equals “Humane-Spiritual CoOperative Democrat”,
at least among our more enlightened selves,
doing decent white family business
as our evolutionary entitlement
because Jesus said this must be so
to become and defend and remain
God’s PureLight Beacon on our SelfImaged Hill,
learning to preoccupy ourselves with criminalizing
and marginalizing aboriginals,
or merely counted, commodified, and reserved
for future abuse.
(The gospels suggest
he mentored and said just the opposite,
as God’s radically inclusive love,
but never mind the details
of original exegetical historical cultural intent,
this is fake non-news we’re talking about.)

This confusion of original ownership
and what best to do with Earth as shared home,
continues to rear its ugly immigrant identity head,
feeding false senses of supremacy
if we cannot find long overdue living within solidarity
through extending healthy cooperative-oriented identity
as Earth’s multiculturing family,
local community, inviting full age and gender and racial
and religious cultural diversity as blessings
within a global cooperative matriarchal economy
recognizing no politically significant difference
between Original Aboriginal Mothers
and Native Mothers,
as these would both originate from and for Mother Earth,
Sacred Scorpion,
ReGenerative Change,
Creator of the Universe(s),
SkyWoman, etc.

Truly Aboriginal Americans,
as they have watched us immigrant waves
play out our continuously comodifying web
faster than our democratically inclusive co-empowerment,
describe our Judeo-Christian immigrant claims
as incompletely arrived and committed
because, in a sense,
our LeftBrain dominant mindbodies
have not yet fully landed with both feet,
Left with Right,
on Earth’s fully-animating New-Old World humus.

We are collectively less and less natively sure,
as each perennial recent immigrant generation becomes reborn,
of whether we would better return
back from where our Christian capitalist ForeFathers
more patriarchally,
and aboriginally,
came from.

Are we going to stay?
Learn Native American health and pathology,
cooperative ways to animate and reanimate nutritional enculturations,
permacultural designs,
self-governing deep ecological economic nutritional education,
matriarchal-patriarchal political organization,
or remain further lost,
far from self-identity’s home
as Commons Immigrants?

If we combine
Native American Original Instructions
to Nanabozho,
First Messianic Man,
with Christ as Creator’s humane-sacred bilateral Son,
and Taoism’s Black Scorpion
as Black YHWH,
meaning rich dark embryonic matriarchal yin-side co-dominant co-presence,
or, more simply,
not-white Empty YHWH,
in sort of an entropic Buddhist way of reversing Interdependence
as also Black fullness of integrity,
then Creator God’s Original Instruction
for all humane-sacred immigrants,
(because time is lifetime
and circular,
in this Native American place of fertile cycling through frozen seasons)
each greets cooperative Mother Earth
as normal healthy maturation.

This is how we become native to EarthTribe,
breathing in Left clear white light
to breathe out pathological Right waste
floating up and out
feeding and recreating Black Scorpion’s matriarchal potential,
too-long repressed,
to re-invest in future waves
of grateful immigrant status;
not so very much about colonizing and disowning
Aboriginal intelligence and wisdom,
taking only what can be commodified
in capital-growing nutritional markets
divinely, if not maybe humanely, intended
through self-manifest, although maybe not so much other-manifest, destiny
of self-declared natives,
unwilling to face hypocrisy of antiChristian piracy,
colonizing history,
buying and selling God’s gratuitous love.

Puritan pirates,
like latter day supremacist capitalists,
failed our democratic potential
to see and hear and feel and taste and smell
our greater healthier potential
conspiracy of Golden Rules for Immigrants
as also Original Instructions for Aboriginals
becoming White through Black
FullColor ScorpionTribes
of and for ecotherapeutic bilateral breathing
eco-intelligent communication,
integrity of His/Her Immigrant EcoStory.


Freedoms to ReGeneratively Farm

You may have noticed the Michigan Catholic farmer
claiming his First Amendment rights have been infringed
to speak his mind
about the degenerative nature of same-sex marriage
when the nearby East Lansing operated Farmer’s Market
determined his farming operation
was not in compliance with a city ordinance
not allowing discriminatory business practices.

The East Lansing City Manager
cited their city’s civil rights ordinance,
including sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes
in “all business practices.”

Notice the cross talk about rights and freedoms
and rights to freedom here.

The farmer claims his right to speak his mind
has been denied.
Yet the Mayor says it is the City’s right
to not engage in commerce
with those whose minds
are not inclined
to protect rights of free sexual orientation and gender identity.

The farmer can believe any supremacist thing he chooses,
and is equally free to speak aloud his mindlessness,
but this gives him no right to demand access to that market
he would prefer remain suppressed.

There is all the difference between rights of free speech
and rights of freedom from restricted actions.

Saying you do not believe in equal civil rights
for all God’s multiculturing children
is protected,
to act in defiance of those protected civil rights
is not protected.

You are within your freedom protecting rights
to believe some people would be better off dead,
yet this is a right of free speech,
not free implementation,
not freedom of action,
not freedom to deny another’s freedom to live
in some way that neither intends, or actually does,
threaten your right to live and say
whatever non-freedom impinging way you choose.

We all have protected freedoms of thought
and opinion
and feeling
and comment
and verbal expression,
but this is does not extend
to economic and political participation rights
to deny others’ freedoms of thought
and opinion
and feeling
and democratic comment
and verbal and nonverbal expression
with no intent to economically victimize or
politically marginalize,
certainly not criminalize,

And all of this perhaps rather misses a more fundamental point.
In a multicultural, multigenerationally-intended,
sustainable democratic climate and landscape,
rights to defend protected freedoms
of expression
were originally intended,
and are more healthily continuously extended,
within a more positive context
of protecting rights to speak of what brings you
a sense of hope and promise,
to speak of what you are for;
and really not so much
about what we are more monoculturally against,
especially in some aristocratic-elitist-supremacist-royalist
non-democratic divisive and competitive way
that builds higher walls between Earth’s MultiCulturing Tribes
and Species
all co-invested in more cooperative climates
and landscapes
and policy discussion frameworks
and ecopolitics.

The right to own property,
including guns
and your own speech,
implies your neighbors’ right to own property
without threat of pollution from your property,
including your violence
and your uncivil speech.


Original Invitations

Rather than Ten Commandments,
beginning with loving YHWH,
iconically accessible and yet mysterious
as ecosystemic Earth,
Native Americans
and perhaps all original people
mutually deploy Original Instructions,
both matriarchal and patriarchal,
intended to become prescriptive
only as the Golden Rule of cooperative learning
grows descriptive for each one listening
for how these creation and self/other management stories
inform our days and nights
as naked immigrants invited on and in this Turtle Island.

These creation instructions, not commandments,
begin with Gaia’s invitation
to do as She loves,
to scatter our best seeds
rooted in healthiest nutritional needs
to follow where and only as long as these grow,
developing seeds of their own to further compost scatter
and to avoid those which ossify
into full-blown egocentric
anthrocentric addictions,
hoarding out what began as healthy need
and grew to dominate our habits of mind and body
becoming capitalizing wealth through pirating
what began as good times
as good seeds
but turned into transparent addictions
to self-powering over Earth’s nature,
Original Invitations to health as wealth,
and not texts and LeftBrain lists and lexicons
of not all that original commandments
to violently hoard fertile wealth
as if this were healthy self-wealth esteem.

Grace can only be truly heard as sacred invitation.
To listen for love as a command,
whether from self or God or other or Earth
as one whole deep and richly wise ecosystem,
sets up a double-bind
competing cooperation competition
between need and emerging addiction to self-idolatry,
between enslavement and self-serving aristocracy,
perennial addictions to overcoming aching loneliness,
rather than becoming cooperative rest,
listening for Earth’s invitations
into deeper and richer voiceless grace.


UnRifling DisAssociations

An old Greek word, ecclesia,
is often translated as church,
but could also be thought of as a civilization
acting civilly,
as a citizenry
acting as responsible citizens.

The noun side of Ecclesia
casts residents as consumers
of democratic and economic cooperative systems,
while the verb side
speaks of residents as producers of democracy
and economically cooperative relationships,
economic investments in and for each other.

I believe it is a stretch of original Intent
to believe that democratic constitutions
derived from and of and for a democratic citizenry,
would not also have this consumer-producer meaning
when speaking of citizens,
human rights and responsibilities,
of our individual and shared cooperative balance
of co-empowering authorities.

A democracy’s citizen
is a consumer of each state’s cooperative ecopolitical networks
but this is not sufficient to grasp both sides
of the pre- and post-revolutionary intent
when legislating of, by, and for us cooperatively acting citizens,
producing decisions and choices,
deliberations and citizen debates,
internally oppositional, and often contentious,
but never disloyal to our underlying democratic cooperative project,
loyal producers of co-regenerative intent,
benign, not parasitic,
available to have our minds preyed upon
but not available to predation,
rabid competitions,
assault on our bodies.

Physical and verbal violence to inflict retributive terror
are not within our democratic arsenal of citizenship,
acting as a body of citizens,
and as individual citizen-productive bodies.

“A well regulated militia
being necessary to the security of the state,
the right of the people [ecclesia]
to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.”

In U.S. history,
this language, penned by James Madison,
was in the context of protecting and asserting State Rights
of self-preservation
for democratic self-optimizing purpose.

In earlier English history,
this right of armed self-defense
roots back toward ancient cultures
of natural-spiritual individual rights
to respond to predators
intruding on personal/familial, tribal space
with rapacious intent
to kill or maim,
to inflict pain,
sometimes sexual, sometimes not,
to capture and directly enslave
or capture and sell people not recognized as ecclesia
so they could be sold as a capitalist cash crop,
perhaps way back, captured as an edible,
to respond to nutritionally urgent needs,
but probably not first preferences.

Armaments, during these originating roots of natural rights
of self-defense
probably began with sticks and stones,
then knives and spears,
then boomerangs and bows with arrows.

All fascinating original intent history,
yet little, if any, of this original ecclesia intent
of local and state militias preserving armed rights
to protect against individual predators,
and other organized citizen predators,
acting in an extremely Originally UnIntended
aggressive way,
as if mutual competitors,
rather than mutual ecopolitical ecclesia cooperators,
suggests the NRA’s legislative agenda
is anything less or more than hate-mongering
organized crimes against a strong healthy natural-spiritual right
of healthy robust democratic citizens
to defend ourselves
against those who would act against,
compete against
healthy citizen consumers of democratic process
acting as cooperative producers of robust ecclesia,
cooperative ecopolitical co-loyalists,
ecotherapeutic citizens of Earth,
and also, by the way,
cooperatively self-regulating States,
and democratic nations.

The NRA’s ecopolitical agenda
has nothing to do with the U.S. Bill of Rights
including the Second Amendment.

It has everything to do with growing anti-ecclesia,
anti-social pathologies,
rather than robust natural-spiritual rights
of democracy producing sacred bodies
of cooperativity,
rather than mutual threat
and unnecessary intimidation.

If the Second Amendment had originally said:

A well-regulated slave market
being necessary to the security of the capitalist state,
the right of the people
[especially slave owners–and explicitly not including slaves themselves]
to keep and bear arms
should not be infringed
[except for non-ecclesia, wild indians and black/red slaves].
Does this not look and sound and smell
much closer to the NRA’s legislative agenda
of self-preserving supremacy
and support for uncontrolled ballistics profiteering,
than the historical articulation
penned by James Madison?

It is not controlling the rights of individual citizens
to fire ballistics at each other,
and to support those who have grown rich
through this anti-democratic corruption,
that is a violation of our Bill of Rights
to act as producers of active cooperative democracy
so much as the absence of control
over antisocial consumers and producers of hatred,
including first and front and center
the NRA of unAmerican organized crimes
against healthy-wealthy
nature-spirit cooperators.

Natural rights to bear arms against other people,
as compared to natural rights to eat, to hunt,
are cooperatively normed,
rather than competitively mediated,
especially within a democratic-intending polity.

Arms, in this historical context,
are tools for self-defense
which, in a democracy,
as codified in the US First Amendment,
begin with the right to cooperatively communicate,
to speak and listen with and among each other,
without need to fear being fired upon.

These natural-spiritual roots to self-defense
and citizenry optimization
are pre-linguistic,
so all the more pre-rifle dis-associations,
pre-ballistics of any kind.

Our Second Amendment,
of and for whom we are becoming
as a democratic-producing people
with natural rights
of cooperative self-regeneration,
to normally speak and listen together WinWin,
and abnormally compete against each other
as WinLose un-democratically provoked
through acts of violence,
armed fear-mongering.

We are WinWin people
disarmed by candor and curiosity
for Original Ecclesial Intent.




Original Freedoms of Intent

Do you see yourself as more Republican
or leaning more Democrat?

Oh my,
I’m a card-carrying Republican.
Came from a long patriarchal line
of red-blooded Republicans.

What makes you a Republican?
What is Republicanism, do you think?

Well…being against the Democrats, mostly.

I get that.
But, what are Republicans for
that Democrats are at least not in favor of
enough to give it sufficient priority
for you to feel economically and politically comfortable?

Republicans are Freedom Fighters.
Give us liberty or death.

Well, presumably we will all have both,
but liberty for what,
freedom to what,
freedom from what?

Free markets
and freedom of religious expression
and free from terrorist and socialist threats,
to begin with;
freedoms protected by our Constitution
including its Amendments
and the Bill of Rights.

And presumably Democrats are, then,
for enslaved by regulation markets,
prescribed and proscribed absence of religious expression,
because they are all secret atheists anyway,
and more willing to accept terrorism and socialism
as part of Earth’s sick political and economic bounty,
and are, at best, ambivalent about freedoms
and values
asserted by Constitutional authorities,
including amendments,
defined by their Original Historical-Cultural Intent.

That sounds about right.

Would you agree that the Preamble
and the somewhat older Declaration of Independence
bear seminal weight
for establishing the Constitution’s intent
with regard to protection and promotion of freedoms?


Democratic freedoms
during our pre- through post-revolutionary period,
were originally defined by contrast
against a backdrop of economic and political plutocracy.
Our interdependent constitution as a free nation
composed of States with their own democratically intending constitutions
were statements that we would not be owned
nor tyrannically controlled,
taxed and terminated,
by royalty.

Freedom from plutocratic authorities lies within our U.S. Constitution’s definition
as a free union of democracies,
to live in interdependent cooperative freedoms
in which political authority’s boundaries
no longer exceed responsive economic co-invested co-responsibilities.
Which party would you argue
is more articulate about sustaining freedoms from plutocratic
power trends and systems and ecopolitical outcomes
of jingoistic nationalism
that disguises triumphalism of the rich and powerful
becoming ever more rich and powerful?

Well, I’m not sure.
That would probably be the Greens
or the Libertarians.

which party is more self-defined
as supporting regenerative interdependent responsibilities
to sustain future generations
of balanced democratic freedoms
from pathological plutocratic authorities
and yet growing freedoms to become responsibly,
co-responsible nurturers and health-mentors
of and for Earth’s future cooperatively renewing
and self-regenerating

That would be the Greens as polypathic PermaCulturists.

So, why aren’t you that,
instead of the card-carrying Republican?

Oh, that’s your easiest question yet:
Because nobody votes for the Greens,
and hardly anybody has even heard,
much less smelled or seen,
a cooperatively networking PermaCulturist.

Unless you count trees and plants and ecosystems.

But we don’t.
They can’t vote.

Or do they?


PositiveYang as NotNotYin

Yang and Yin evolved a hell
and Yin bilaterally tumbled after, and fore,
then Yang became the big kahuna,
and YinYin disappeared in heaven.

Imagine this 4-dimensional YangEarth
revolution-refined by time through BiLateral Yin.

Zero-sum embryonic Mommie’sMilk Awareness,
and then gradually accumulating discontinuous memories
of Other events
are necessary, often messy,
but not sufficient,
for bilateral Elder “RightBrain” inductively stored
Yin eco-consciousness,
DNA and RNA fractal-regeneratively root systemic,
dipolar co-arising elegant sufficiency
of YangEgoCenter as “LeftBrain” deductive
as necessary,
but not sufficient
for remembering Yin as “ElderMatriarchal-RightBrain” inductive,

polypathic consciousness.

Metrically External/Internal zero-sum group
and game
and ecosystemically Earth doublebound space/time balanced
in a 4Base EcoSystem of 4 unfolding nutritional seasons
of Prime Organic Relationship
within each day and night,
and within each lunar month,
and within each perennial ring of revolutionary Earth,
as PolynomialYang = Not(NotPolypathic)Yin
where Yang=Yin notnot double-bind dipolar and fractal-squared
where Yin-squared = c-squared = e-squared
zero-sum PermaCultural
PositiveHealth Function
of Earth as both Mass and ReGenerative Communion.

Which began to be freely served to multiculturing all
right after Yang and Yin walked up the hill
to fetch a pail of fresh climate water.
Yin fell down and broke her notnot crown
as Yang came tumbling
dipolar co-arisingly
and before
and after
and within
and without
and within…


Which Came First?

Who would argue
about which came first,
regeneratively intelligent design,
or a decomposing degenerating natural Earth?

No one.
To do so is too patently absurd,
when we choose to see these two
not only as oppositional cause-effect,
but also as appositional
dipolar co-arising balance
of regenerative information
tacitly implied within decomposing energetic balance.

The very idea that either regenerating purpose
or degenerating nature
could originally, foundationally, come one before the other
appears and feels anti-ecological,
like choosing WinLose degenerative static being
over WinWin positive equals double-binding negative deviant
regenerative/degenerative co-arising
toward further multi-generational co-becoming.