Tag Archives: metaphysics

Uncategorized

Mutual Messiahs, ReMix

Who’s vision are you unfolding for whom?

Are you aware you carry a basket of bread
on your head
and still beg at every door? (Rumi)

You love nature.
Like bread, Earth’s nature feeds you
and, like yeast, absorbs you,
is that of which you are made,
and making,
and resolve to eternally create and recreate,
if only you could.

But, you can and you are
and the manna in your head already knows
healthy yeast redeems regenerationally
diastatically incarnational,
with smooth-souled omnicoherence,
comprehensively balancing deduction with induction,
eco-confluent paradigms and dreams and language
and permaculture,
ecological teleology systematically grows panentheistic,
polytheistic,
polynomial,
polypathic,
polycultural,
balancing cooperative economies with networking political vocations
to permanently eco-logicize Earth.

This is your Day, your EcoTribal Self
our EcoLogic metaculture and Transhistory,
our EcoTherapy synergy,
tipping toward balancing points and principles
of blinding spiritual intuition with restrained scientific deduction,
harmonizing Left-brained language
with Right-brained confluent v. dissonant inductive awareness
of this bicameral basket on our head
as our balancing supereco and my id-entity
engaging your ego/eco balancing praxis,
whether hope-filled or hopeless,
triumphant or despairing,
you know this already,
throughout this manna that is your nesting culture,
decomposing through unraveling death’s long post-millennial process
to regenerate as
“redistributed [positive-therapeutic] subfunctions
of Other” informing ecosystems. (B. Fuller)

Born of stardust,
messiahs mutually mentoring
our pilgrimage toward Earth’s starlight;

e-squared function = c-crystal (cubed)
subatomic polyculture,
waiting behind each begging door
for you to return Other’s cooperatively gravitating namaste
mutual unfold.

Optimized Living Systems are to metaphysical teleology
as ecosystems are to physically regenerating (“special case”) economies,
as EcoTherapy informs design, intention, empirical research,
learning and consciousness,
love, and active peace, and justice,

and RNA self-optimizing fractally-dynamic information
QBit Quirky Byting Octaves, harmonic CQI Win-Win yinyin syntax,
ionic and ergodically balancing value systems.

Your bicameral basket holds no non-polynomial information
because this is an oxymoron,
we already intuitively know everything and all not-thing metaphysical
as diverse resolutions of Prime +/- (0)-synced Relationship,
polynomial information negatively correlates wild binomial yeast
soaring surf of time’s double-bound equinox divide.

Please continue unfolding our permacultured cooperative co-arising political vision,
mutual investment
biosystemic and ecosystemic and information binary-network systemic
and stop begging from competitively unbalanced economists,
it’s just not dignified,
or anything close to wildly, creatively, fun.

Standard
Uncategorized

Conversation with Chris Santos-Lang

My internal conversation with you, Kramer, Bressan, and all our microbes, together, in brackets.

What “Letting People [and Places, including Earth] Be Themselves” Means

Chris Santos-Lang

In “Humans as Superorganisms: How Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes, and Other Selfish [Mutually-Struggling] Entities Shape Our Behavior,” Peter Kramer and Paola Bressan present evidence that we are [nondual] “not unitary individuals,” but rather “collections of human and nonhuman [RNA/DNA-regeneratively syntaxed] elements that…in an incessant [cooperatively contentious] struggle [default as positive ‘with’ and sometimes ‘negative reverse-synaptic’ against], jointly define who we are.” The research they highlight challenges those of us who want to ‘let people be themselves’ to explain precisely what we mean by “themselves [and ourselves.” If people are [nondual] not unitary individuals, then what could “themselves [as ourselves]” refer to?

The notion that we are not unitary individuals is not new. [Plato didacted the interdependence of intrinsically social beings, and the neoplatonists went wild with that core holonic universal view.] Quantum physicists have pointed out that every atom of our bodies is entangled with the entire universe [inclusive of both Bohm’s Explicate Order and Implicate Order and Buckminster Fuller’s Convex-Positive-Special Case v. Concave-Double-Bilateral-Reverse-String-Temporal Metaphysical Interior Eco-Cooperative TransParent Function-more or less], biologists have pointed out that less than 2% of those atoms remain in us for over a year, and psychologists have pointed out that the mechanisms of our [positive] cognition typically extend beyond our brains to include scratchpads, musical instruments, calculators, and the Internet [and extend back through time toward the distant progenitive-as-regenerative origins of fractal-syntaxed RNA]. Kramer and ressan add merely that our [economic] values [as objectives] and [political] preferences [as subjective progenitors]–what we call our “soul”–is just as entangled with our environment as are our other aspects.

In my opinion, the most compelling branch of their argument is the one relating to microbes. Only about 10% of the various types of [RNA/DNA fueled] cells our bodies require to flourish are [DNA] human. The rest are [RNA-uracil-rooted] microbes. Although most of the microbe studies cited by Kramer and Bressan were conducted on mice, it seems clear that the decisions humans make–how we vote, whom we marry, whether we commit a crime–depend upon which microbes dominate our internal [autonomic] ecosystem at the time. Thus, we can lose our [perception of autonomous] identity–the person our friends know us to be may cease to [monopolistically] inhabit our [mind-]bodies–not just through a lobotomy, but also through some combination of antibiotics and probiotics which irreversibly [or reversibly? I wonder?] tip the balance of power among the microbes within us.

Such microbes might be called parasites of our [mutually parasitic] bodies, but they cannot be parasites of [with?] our selves, for they are an essential part of who we are. Kramer and Bressan would argue that our rights belong to our entire internal [and external] ecosystem[ic landscapes], including those microbes. Laws to protect you [and Earth] must therefore take the form of laws to protect an ecosystem, not necessarily protecting particular microbes, but protecting [mutually parasitic reverse-hierarchically structured, increasingly cooperative metasystemic, with bilateral (concave/convex) spacetime, co-prehensive] balance among them. This sets the stage for shocking reform of our legal system and conception of human [as nature’s spiritua/ergodic/ionic/cogravitational] rights [of freedom to cooperate balancing freedom from struggling-against competition of Other].

Perhaps the paradigm of “selfish-survivalist” genes has been unduly influenced by a culturally jaundiced interpretation of Darwinian evolutionary struggle. But the default setting on Darwinian evolution is positive-regenerative, which would suggest struggling with others to maintain co-gravitational balance, perhaps defining what I mean by eco-normic cooperation. Nature’s biological systems seem to struggle against mutually negative {lose, lose} eco-gravitational disbalancing choices, which might be paradigmed as competitive eco-politics. Struggling is normatively neutral; “selfish” is not, and assumes a monocultural level of competitive-default objectives that is not supported by the regenerative fact that cooperative polyculturally organic nature, life, exists at all.

Summary Notes, Dillenbeck:

Cooperative economic subjects lead toward competitive, politically-healthy, objectives of eco-consciousness.

Struggling with suboptimized relationships avoids over-attachment to a moderately-healthy Win-Lose poly-econormic status-quo.

Struggling against suboptimally dissonant-yet-static relationships avoids over-detachment from a perceived-as-toxically-competitive (over-heated/drama climate) status-quo.

For more from Chris Santos-Lang, visit http://www.grinfree.com

Standard
Uncategorized

Gaia and Fr. Time Are Lovers: True InFormating Scandal

Gaia’s love first embraces Earth’s tribes
who then embrace Her back
through Gaia’s co-redeemer enculturation gift,
pay-it-forward grace of permacultured history,
karma of EarthTribe’s economy,
mutually-parasitic subsidiarity
embracing universally regenerate Host
in political-through-personal empowering solidarity
of EarthTribe’s Eco-Passionate Universal Rights.

She paid the health assurance rent
we’ve been redeeming ever since.

And so it is
that Ego’s love invites EcoEarth’s co-passion,
mutually held holy compassion,
synergy of with for Earth’s co-redemptive Rights
embracing Gaia’s Universal Nest.

Not sure where this climatic
and over-heated story
of bicamerally diastatic love
as balance harmonic octaves
starts,
because love is timeless
in this sense
that it can go forward
only as it has emerged from past
except in bicameral systems,
where love,
as synergetically dynamic time of presence
is perceived and comprehended
as bilaterally unfolding.

For example,
bicameral lungs
autonomically know the difference and sameness
of Yang inhalation formation
and Yin exhalation flowing out frequencies.

As bicameral hearts
autonomically feel the difference and dipolar symmetry
of inflation toward diastatic Yang power
and recession away deep flat-line trending
toward static Yin-aptic Basic Attendance.

As bicameral mind-bodies comprehend
this balancing and permaculturing love story
of Universal Earth
and bilateral Fr. Time 0’Mega Science.

Once upon bilateral time,
Earth Day dawned her Birth of Passion Story,
co-passion story,
passion story,
reading with passive purgative passion
Her co-redemptive narrative
of cooperative
mutual subsidiarity
co-arising messianism.

Asked Earth of her ScienceSun,
“Can you truly love a rock,
or any of those static, sometimes dissonant, objects,
like egocentrism
anthro-centrism
or a steel-grey slate wall?”

No,
love is co-relational,
different than unilateral basic appreciation,
Basic Attendance
emerges love as positive enthymeme.

“How can we attend to love’s co-passion
in absence of its expressed return?
I fear I fade
my climate wilts
for lack of co-redemptive love
within my rightful seasons
of cooperative power
and ecological flow.”

“Your neutral economic science investments
display our true ecological incubator, and not, laboratory vestments.”

Universe’s comprehensive co-gravitating love
emerges now
enthymematic photosynthetic evolutionary compassion,
co-arising co-passion,
eco-consciousness
of Ego’s quintessentially ubiquitous
bicamerally balancing
RNA-syntaxed
sensory timelessness within metaphysicality.

“My children co-redeem.
PassionYang, child for deductively reducing suffering,
PeaceYinYin, instinctive child of kindness,
content
kinship
content-full
mindful,
together, twins of bipolar contention,
dipolar contentment.”

Redeemers,
unlike those returning wealth for health value,
receive a healthy/therapeutic advance
for services to be rendered later,
like paying one’s rent on the first of each day,
and month,
then redeeming that gifting-it-forward investment.
Redemption,
unlike a coincidental exchange,
co-arises a return
for a WinWin pay-it-forward investment.
Yang brings forth political power
for Yin’s ecological economic optimization flow,
as
Yin brings forth full EarthRights logical double-binding co-redemptive flow,
for Yang’s more inclusive political form of wealth: eco-therapeutic health.

Co-passionate peace
dipolar bicamerally harmonizing
with Earth’s full octave fractal form and function,
eternally regenerates
Fr. Time’s spatially econtented informational telus-dance
teleodance of co-intelligence
gazing through 4 equidimensional eco-consciousness seasons.

Gaia and Fr. Time’s permacultural affair
looms their co-redemptive weave
throughout TransMillennial PolyCultural Power.

Note: Provoked by an internal dialogue with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 183 (SelectBooks, 2011): “When you literally begin to feel the telos, or [Yang-in and Yin-ex] directionality, of the entire process moving in and through your own nervous system, that is when you directly experience that movement as a [4-dimensional spacetime] vertical impulse in your own [eco]consciousness. You see that where we are headed is never static or predetermined [nor diastatically redetermined]. You awaken to what I sometimes call the ‘radical indeterminacy’ of the [timeless NOW eco-echo] life-process itself. As conditioned and mechanical as much of it might seem, the fact is that in every moment there is the possibility for [organically emergent] novelty. In every moment there is the potential for something new [revolving from something old]. In every moment, there is room for [evolutionary] emergence. That’s the miracle of [positive] evolution [as interior-landscaped, synergetic integrative, unitarian, Beloved revolution with universal outcome of bicameral-balanced eco-consciousness].”  Some readers may see my Buckminster Fuller influence in comprehending positively dynamic evolution as synergetic (special case-subset) and love (metaphysical universal-Group Theory of co-arising zero-bilateral-elliptics).

Standard
Uncategorized

YangyYolks with YinYin Whites

Start and end each day,
and life,
with a taoist egg.

I doubt my eggs are religious.

No, but they are natural,
organic incubators,
co-arising binomial yolk form
with white-transparent regenerative function,
teleology,
and cosmology, maybe,
if you’re a chicken,
or a turkey, or a sitting duck.

So you say.
I guess these eggs are merely metaphysical.

You might best remove “merely” from “metaphysical”
lest you perpetuate an oxymoron.
Metasystemic physics,
like life,
at their best, and most permanently encultured,
have room for religion and spirituality,
as well as economic science and eco-logical nature.

OK, but I’m not absorbing this metaphysics
of a co-arising incubator,
or an egg,
or whatever.

Eggs are temporary organic incubators.
Therefore, comparatively Closed-Set,
double-boundary individuated.
Only their exterior shells
remain actively interdependent with their environ-mental
risk and opportunity.
This double-boundary formating eco-centric development
responds to thermodynamic balance
at both yolk-cellular
and transparent organic/holistic fuel,
energy,
fertilizer,
compost levels
of 4-RNAchannel co-operatively balancing synergetic organization.
Eggs are sensitive to co-gravitational pressure
and have bilaterally limited tolerance levels for speed of climatic change,
which interact with their relative temperatures,
temporal sense of heat and cold,
breathing in and out,
slower warm and faster cold.

Maybe I am lost in the forest of your analogizing
but sounds more like you are co-arising
well-composted ego in these eggs.
And, this shell sounds like a scientific paradigm,
with some seriously revolutionary boundary issues,
mutually incompatibility building up a defensive perimeter,
anti-inductive while pro-deductive
of in-formation dissonance
protecting internal design process,
even language and enculturation,
secluding indigenous specialists to research within,
maybe.
Still not seeing the Tao in this egg,
or ego,
or co-arising incubator,
or whatever whenever
originates
and cultivates
new life.

If Yang is the power of yolked formation,
incarnation,
while Yin is bilateral flow and function
of ecologically positive octave-frequency nutrients,
regeneratively composting embryonic fractal forms
of RNA-rooted teleological function,
grace,
then which is this full-colored economic health-yolk
and which is this transparent ecological webbish white,
and is it healthier if they tango gracefully,
or tangle bad karmically?

OK, yes, now I see the taoist, well-timed, egg. This begins to feel like egg-cooking class for a vegan. Now what?

An embryo is a “budh”,
if you are a conscientific Buddha-brain
co-arising embryo,
and a “bud”
in English.
If you imagine your Left brain ego-identification
as your egg’s DNA’s yolk-center
being fed most eco-nutritiously
by your RNA-inclusive
SuperEco Right-Only Bilateral
Not-Languaged/Eco-Exegesis
TransParenting cultural fuel-power
of yin bilateral light squared = c-squared
= e-squared Wisdom,
that might be how a post-millennial eco-scientist
would incubate,
design,
and research,
and nondually bicamerate incarnation,
comprehensively con-scientific
polyculturally co-operative
co-arising consciousness
as co-regenerative enlightenment.

So, we are all economic scientists balancing ego-logical
as eco-normative systems.
Homo Bicameral Sapiens as EcoNomists.

Almost.
But, because Yang (+) ego/eco-bodies
are dipolar incarnations
of Yin’s transparently co-arising eco-soul intention,
Yin is Yang equivalent only as squared,
or double-negatived,
or double-bound,
or double-identified,
or both-and
as well as either-or,
or dipolarly frac-taled,
like RNA strings of regenerating in-metaphysic-formation,
coincidentally co-arising
balancing eco-binomial
[prime root of “polynomial”]
Right intuitive fractal-octave frequency harmonic
in RNA’s spacetime natural co-arising systemic consciousness.

Wow, dude, that’s some really esoteric shit you’ve been smoking!
Left-yolks just bangin’ gracefully away
with Right
ransParently flowing evolutionary information
of eco-conscientific revolutions.

Maybe,
but sticking with generic embryonic Left-brain beginnings,
embryonics, genetics, metaphysics,
a bicameral Taoist ego language developer
might re-paradigm “esoteric” as “eco-terra”–
Earth’s ecological syntax-normative
autonomic intelligence,
as ubiquitously displayed
in fractal-root tree structures
of healthy temporal-spatial cellular development,
emerging from aptic-universally transparent
plasmatic
perma-cultural awareness
appreciation of a more aptic-thru-synaptically inclusive
bicameral Right-unitarian with Left-universalist eco-consciousness.

Now you’re saying we are a species of anonymous Buddhists,
Taoists,
and also Unitarian Universalists?
You know,
that “anonymous Christian” conjecture
by Hans Kung
really didn’t get great reviews
from many multi-religious exegetes.

Yes,
but Christianity is a theistically framed view
of our shared eco-consciousness,
our Original Story,
while UUs,
Taoists,
and Buddhists
emerge naturally bilateral co-arising principles of shared consciousness
as self-proclaiming exegetical teleology
incarnating systematic theology;
an ecologic of Fuller’s Universal Intelligence,
Yang-Form with Yin-Function, nondually unitarian,
assumes co-gravitational balance as transparent purpose
toward discerning ego-satisfactory meaning (and “meme”ing),
for “Universe”,
“Earth”, and all DNA/RNA encrypted Earth Tribes
sharing a cooperative vocation
to balance our co-gravitational solidarity
with our thermodynamic eco-DNA/RNA harmonic default preference
for Win-Win mutual Yolk and White subsidiarity,
reverse-hierarchical governance eco-norms,
electromagnetic with elder webbed transparent nutrients
co-mentoring infant yolk.

I think more rainbowed folks
will like these yolks
but I’m not so sure our whites
will appreciate such co-arising/co-falling transparency.

Time’s natural evolutionary
and revolutionary purpose
is primordial and eco-centric gratitude for being,
as compared to human nature’s language of meaning,
becoming some intent we are not yet.

The evolution of our human natural culture
explicates
explains
our cooperative vocational
ecological purpose,
from this exegetical core of consciousness
we each are free to discover
those meaningful outcomes
value-fertile,
most likely to enrich our ego/eco balancing identity
as a binomially implied SELF+OTHER=WE vocation.

Our ego
bicamerally evolved
asks how my environmental risks and opportunities
intersect with my internally responsive opportunities
and dissonant risks
to arrive within this karmic here/now moment?

Ionic balancing = bionic fractal co-arising
polynomial prime relational metaphysical
eco-consciousness that positively radiates convex
fractal-ergodic universal balance
remains eternally
timelessly transparently bilaterally incarnating
and excommunicating,
inhaling and exhaling,
concaving
bionic unitarian inclusive-octave harmonics.

I’m still not feeling the love and passion
within this hard-shelled scientific Taoist metaphysical egg.

Fertility, rather than sterility,
producing love
rather than merely consuming life’s essential nutrients,
these are timing,
tipping point,
temporal,
temperate,
temperature systemic
familial regenerative flow and function issues.

To Optimize Continuous Quality Improvement
of comprehensive egolove and therapy,
we cultivate equivalent confluence
with our larger eco-logical health values
for economic cooperative networks
and guilds,
neighborhood eco-justice intent
as politically eco-nomic permacultural steering practice.

Polycultural Climax of Beloved Community
and Family
and Tribe
is our RNA-rooted vocation objective,
our full-yolked ecological purpose,
theological sacred eco-normic vocation,
while Permacultural Design and Development
is our transparently shared ego-logical web
holding deductive/inductive Left-Right brain co-dominantly
co-arising meaning;
the opposite of cognitive and affective dissonance,
which is more like scrambling eggs.

Which brings us back to breakfast?

We need to be vigilant
to neither over-incubate our yolks
nor under-cultivate our transparent white yins.
Freedom from half-baked inwardness
evolves freedom for just-right
twice-fried out organic hypotheses.

We regenerate our full-yolked ego-life cake
by consuming 100% eco-polycultural
full multi-systemic therapeutic
prime-relational
comprehensively informational conscience of
reverse-hierarchical Common solidarity-governance,
fractal-cooperative syntaxed,
0-Prime-Soul temporal-spatial eco-identity.

To incarnate our full eco-fueled potential:
Reduce deductive-only knowledge-power to 50% of consciousness value,
To free up the additional 100% of “sub”consciousness=Eco-Consciousness
intellectual memory and tipping-point power.
Reduce “human nature” = “ego-nature” by 50%
and all Earth Tribe will reconnect their love of inclusive ecotherapy.
Reduce ego’s cunning, calculating, commodification,
value for immediate power outcome efficiency over long-term effectiveness,
confusing values for inhaling life and exhaling death
with Left-brain dominant language of “good” and “evil,”
so all Earth Tribe comprehends we already are who and what
we can eternally depend upon:
Reveal eco-self as double-yin function Right,
to confluently
competently
sustainably
optimally embrace HomoSap(o)yinned eco-revolution,
Reduce ego-centeredness by half,
to add Earth’s intuited ecotherapeutic exegetical wisdom,
Deduct 50% of ego-desire
to discern EcoSelf’s tipping point
desire for full rich love of each composting moment.

Which brings me back to breakfast choices.

Try walking meditation with ginger-root tea.

I knew this would turn vegan on me.

Root systems tend to nourish information branching trends
most optimally
with contented environ-mental gratitude.

Root systems tend
to nourish in
formation trends,
optimally,
with con-tented
environ-men
tall gratitude.

Standard
Uncategorized

Professor Yangyinstein’s Agenda

The Professor’s campaign
although stealthily benign
still co-arose fair hecklers.

How can you reassure me
that our vulnerable children
will not hate me
and you
for stealing from all Earth’s tribal presence,
and any possibility of healthy future?

While Yangyinstein stood stunned
with wonder
about all the possibilities singing such reassurance

What I must know right now
from you who would lead us
not just through your permaculturally policied principles
of systemic process with polyculturally beloved results,
but also concretely through these next four years,
what is your cooperative political
and economic experience with
your family
your neighborhood
your established constituency of mutual healthy-wealth?
How is your EcoTribe
informed by pursuit of wealth as inclusive health,
by richly nutritious optimization choices and deliberative process,
moving you away from Business As Usual,
Win-Lose familiar,
even familially familiar for some,
strategies toward suboptimizing competitive investments,
invented by deductive-reductive Left-brain dominant enslavement.

Before the final “t” had echoed,
a pithy shot from Left to Right:

Please let us not settle for winning now
by choosing policies dissonant with global
through local
positive synergetic eco-consciousness, now.

Professor’s mind reeling
with all this yinyin feeling
so appealing beyond reasons
unpeeling within their best seasons
of karma-roots growing grace-flowers.

When from the weasel stealthy back
yin wilted with guilt on the edge of our forest,
self blame,
too comfortable with living only halfway
within this United Upper 5% of Consumers,
stealing 28% of time’s encrusted fossil investment
as if by collective right
as if without loss irreparable to the 95% co-repressingly unhealthy
today
and the 100% of future life generations
born nearly bankrupt
of healthy economic and ecologically wealthy trends
suffering from our eco-pathological
Left-brain enslaving dominatrix
increasingly autistic and withdrawn
bender,
over-investing in high risk eco-dislogical Win-Lose
economic assumptions
not supported by endosymbiotic co-enculturating functions
of Time’s regenerative evolution.

Reiterative echoes rang through Yangyinstein’s bicameral ears
speaking bilateral timelessness
in confluent co-gravitation of transparent harmony,
yang Left deductive languaged
yin Right inductive syntaxed:

My mind grows tired
endless self-referencing loops
language
voices.
As my body co-arises
endless SelfOther referencing rituals
and permacultural practices,
breaths and heart beats and wind songs
nature’s beauty and wholeness sounds
of warm confluent sap
richly remembered river
confluently flowing syntax, DNA-opti-nomial balanced.
Your body only speaks
languages of wisdom and suffering dissonant pain,
but your mind listens through metrically regenerative syntax;
PolynomialPositive P grows Left-dominant deductive
WHILE
NotNot Polynomial’s RNA-Right Roots remain dominant inductive
autonomic-aptic/synaptic balanced
AND
all the above is Left-brain language
for Right-brain comprehension;
Yang = P
OVER
NotYin + NotYin = N(NP) double-transparently celled cosmology.
Tao as Time’s Bilateral Regenerative Balance
toward Binary/Binomial/Bilateral Co-Arising Eco-Consciousness.
What you thought of as “evil”
is stealthy weasel medicine of reversing “live”s syntax
and icons
and ions
for decompositionally imaginative
and intuitively predictive
purposes,
dream-dancing our revolutionary understory
of bicameral dissonance
between PricklyYangs and GooeyYins.

Professor listened deeply
to speak to Business As Competitively Left-brained Usual:

“I hope it is clear how this [our] story
maps onto the real economy
[of our timeless political-relational religion].
Because of [Win-Lose strategic] interest,
at any given time
the amount of money [spiritual/physical value] owed
is greater than
the amount of money [value] already existing.
To make new money [metaphysical value]
to keep the whole [physical] system going,
we have to breed more chickens [commodities],
we have to create more ‘goods and services’
[and/or create a higher cooperative quality].
The principal way of doing so
is to begin selling something
that was once free
[through all of Time, to share in Commons of Earth’s Tribe].
It is to convert
[yinyin] forests into [yang] timber,
[yin] music into [yang] product,
[yin] ideas into [yang] intellectual property.
[yin] social [cultural relational] reciprocity
into [yang] paid services [economic transaction reductionism].”

But, this EarthTribe Body,
with confluent bicamerally balancing mind,
hears and proposes platforms and parties
of endless SelfOther Win-Win rituals
and practices,
breaths and heart beat meditation medication,
bird songs and eco-logic of healthy wealth
nature’s echoing beauty and wholeness sounds
of warm permacultural confluence
richly remembered as confluent syntax,
DNA/RNA regenerative balance
outweighing cognitive/affective dissonance
and overly anxious settling for assonance
where full polycultural harmonics
rest
just waiting to sing their tipping points
more loudly.

Your voices with mine,
that is our agenda.
Your voices without mine,
that is my politically economic self-optimizing agenda
to hear and harmonize
regeneratively.

 

Note: Quote is from Professor Charles Eisenstein, pp. 100-1, Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition, 2011, Evolver. A most enlightening read for those who buy toilet paper and coffee all the way through those engaged in political process to build cooperative economic networks. Verse format and comments within brackets are mine, and not intended to be other than cooperative embellishment to what already shines alone. There is also at least an implied hint here about how I believe a permacultural designer and developer of systems might respond to the Clay Math Institute’s P v NP issue. I believe time’s co-gravitational response is that P=N(NP) as space-concave is to bilaterally co-arising time-convex. At a deep Left-Right hemispherically balanced deduct/induct resonance level of eco-consciousness, I suspect we all autonomically/neurally believe that Positive Exterior is equivalent to its Double-Negative Interior Landscape, as this is the syntax of RNA’s unfolding/refolding form with function.

Standard
Uncategorized

Prophets and Messiahs

The difference between bad-old-boy competitively evolving egg whites
and good-girl revolutionary just-us-yolks
is the difference between prophetic intent
and messianic practice,
said Professor Glory
in her Gospel of Permaculture class,
one Friday morning
while sitting on her
crass desk of Primal Theory.

What could this dipolarity possibly mean,
between prophets of reforming doom and brighter co-redeemers,
for science and a more exegetical philosophy?
she apparently asked rhetorically
as surely no pupil would raise a voice or brow
to expansively respond.

Prophet Kuhn’s Problem of Incommensurability
within scientific revolutions,
as contrasted to normal-science evolutions,
runs logically parallel
to Darwin’s problem
that endosymbiosis appears to conclude
that the genetically rich will always get richer,
whether these be biological genes
or paradigmatic memes,
without explaining a more complex phylogenetic recreativity
and interdependence
resulting in great speciating transitions
and scientific revolutions
across multiple paradigms,
bringing what was individuated
into a new,
more permaculturally explicated,
consciousness of evolving ecto-cooperatively synced.

Culturally synergetic trends
across ectosymbiotic revolutions
of cooperative Win-Win evolutionary diastasis,
or, as we like to say in Permaculture,
“climaxing beloved community”
conjoins complexly interdependent
paradigms
species
within ecological systems.

So
one prophet’s competitively incommensurable endo-evolution
of Business As Usual shouting for reform
could also be a cooperative messiah’s meta-commensurable
ecto-revolutionary
permacultural exegesis
rooted in a fractal regenerativity of relativity theory,
as Primal Relationship of Left with Right bicameral consciousness.

Right-meta-intuitive with Left-endo-ego-deductive balance
coarises two nondual
endo with ecto symbiotic environmental views
of culture,
nature,
form,
information,
deductively-physical with intuitively-metaphysical function,
con-scientific conscience,
consciousness of supporting prophetic evolutions
promising revolutionary cooperative permacultural design
and development
of familial
and tribal
and all ectosymbiotic
political and eco-logical eco-normics.

Prophets predict scientific revolutions
most exegetically and co-redemptively correct,
as in historically accurate about Great Transitions,
after the fact of swelling intuitive/deductive cultural support.

Meanwhile
the co-messianic promise of a new cooperative
permacultural
metaphysical endo/ectosymbiotic evolutionary paradigm
may resolve more ectosymbiotic imbalances
long before competitive BusinessAsUsual Left-brain dominance
realizes he has already lost interest
enthusiasm
investment
in further Win-Lose Evolutionary Prophecies.

Permaculturing seasons
with deductive/inductive developmental reasons
long ago RNA-inclusively proved themselves
to be at least as successful endosymbiotically,
deductively,
reductively within any one paradigm or species,
as ectosymbiotically,
metasystemically,
polyculturally,
universally,
cosmologically,
seasonally/transitionally fractal rhythms of eco-consciousness as Time;
a Win-Win Opera in 4 confluent voices
with Polynomial Uracil singing full Yang Summer of ReGenesis
with Not-Not Polynomial Cytosine’s full Yin-Yin Winter DeComposition
while Adenine-Springs forward Yin to Yang consumption
and Guanine-Falls back Yang toward Yin production,
A with G
and U with C
each bi-elliptically
dipolar-fractal (0)-soul centrally
regeneratively revolving diastasis;
bicamerally functional in-form-ation–
not-not cognitive dissonance theory.

Both Left-endo and Right-ecto symbiosis
are important to bicameral co-messiahs
with scientific-intuitive
revolutionary/transitional
information processes,
autonomic-aptic-endemic
steering toward pandemic
enculturation.

Quoting my colleague Professor C. Eisenstein,
“Are people happier now,
more fulfilled,
for having films
rather than tribal storytellers,
MP3 players
rather than gatherings around the piano?
Are we happier eating mass-produced food
rather than that from a neighbor’s field
or our own garden?
Are we happier?
Has any new need been met?”

Intending this quote rhetorically
concluded with a question,
Professor Glory smiled with pleasure
at the smallest person voice
far in back of her great assembly hall,
“Our new permacultural need
on behalf of all EarthTribe species
is cooperative networking capacity
which might revolve recapacity
to gather around a piano
to become each other’s song
sung in exquisite harmonic octaves,
with four equally balanced voices
co-messianically blending East with prophetic West
and exegetically back again,
reiterating karmic grace.”

Well sung.
Co-arising revolution is to exegetical regenesis
as prophetic evolution is to eisegetical phylogenesis.

 

Note: Charles Eisenstein quote, p. 81, Sacred Economics, 2011, Evolver. Small voice in the back, Uracil-Unanimous QBit.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Einstein and Bucky’s Fifth Quarter

Bucky:
Why didn’t you remind people
that relativity of spacetime relationship
is double-bound and fractally rhythmed
under he Commons Metric Assumption
of 3 spatial and 1 bilateral progenitive time dimension
equals a Zero-Moment spacetime-centric
balancing thermodynamic theory?

Einstein:
Why didn’t you choose my word “relativity”
rather than your more positive-slanted “synergy”
in your geometrics of universal consciousness?

Bucky:
Eulerian prime relationality is midway positive
but also double-knotted and fractal negative,
as convex-within.
If Synergetics has a positive stance,
it may also be true
that “relativity” has a negatively-reductive slant.
Zero-Core Concave/Convex Universe
as Prime Relationship
feels more nondually transparent
than a Universal Theory of Relativity…
but, oh yes, by the way,
this Relativity of space and time story
takes place
within our shared assumption
of 4 equidimensional dynamics
as Prime Fractal SpaceTime Relationship.

Einstein:
I don’t recall saying anything about fractals,
although I did stipulate a 3-Space and 1-Time
Universe
as we know it in human-consciousness.

Bucky:
But c-squared begins with a fractal.
Square roots
regenerate metric-logical fractals.
To commodify the speed of light’s 0-Core Time
as “c-squared”
is to point directly at Bohm’s Implicate Order
of fractal form and functional dynamic syntax
st-ringing theory.

Einstein:
You think too much in ecologic.
Math and physics
boil and toil and trouble
more inclusively as Group Theory.

Bucky:
Well,
have you been following what Thurston
and Perelman
and those folks
have been saying
about the double-elliptical binding 0-soul core
of any integrative,
confluent,
and logically possible,
rational system?

Einstein: No, zero is much too small
to timelessly hold
my eternally universal interest.

Bucky:
Not that I always need the last word
but zero is also much too timeless
to share your expansive consciousness.

Einstein:
Hah!
That was a good one.

Standard
Uncategorized

I Believe

I believe
our current overly competitive economy
and our environmental critical climate transitional era
is a blip on the screen of history
and autonomic, intrinsic perma-culture,
a Positive Deviant aberration
now drawing to a quick close
because both history and culture have been kind to confluence,
and unkind to dissonant Win-Lose fantasy-game behavior,
intent,
financial and policy planning to compete within a short-changed
universe.

I believe
we are in our deepest loving
and beautiful bicameral beating hearts,
full-blooded DNA/RNA logosed syntax,
Cooperative CoRedeemers
Mutual Messiahs
with and for and of and through
all RNA/DNA prime regneratively celled EarthTribes.

I believe we needed to invest
in this competition and deductive-scientific transitional
over-swing of Left-brained linguistic/deductive dominance,
reductive individuating consciousness,
to learn together
how to cooperate our ecological economy
and why it is important
to communicate
and invest
and produce
and consume
as a globally cooperative network
designed to protect
cherish
and re-polyculture
this Beloved Earth EcoSystemic ProGenitor.

I believe
we have an internal ecoconsciousness landscape
of unfolding Time as fractally 3-dimensional,
composed of binomial prime function
with Zero-Centric meta-polymorphic regenerative form.

I believe
we are a Society of Unitarian Universalist Bodhisattva CoOperators
within EarthTribe’s self-ecologizing agenda.

Standard
Uncategorized

Discerning Revolutionary Transitions, with Integrity

Today we begin with a quote from Charles Eisenstein
with commentary in brackets
informed by Bucky Fuller’s cooperative metaphysic
of Synergetic Steerage.

“We have a[n intuitied, autonomic systemic] need to stay in contact with people with whom we share emotional and economic ties. In past times, these people were usually close by. A hunter-gatherer or fourteenth-century Russian peasant would have had little use for a telephone. Telephones [and www] began to meet a need only when other developments in technology and culture spread human beings [even] farther apart and splintered extended families [and neighborhoods] and [national through] local communities [as sustainable ecosystems]. So the basic need they meet is not something new under the sun.” [Basic cooperative communication need has evolved to global cooperative scale because technology’s deductive path has evolved a co-arising economic/ecological imperative.]

p. 80, Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition, 2011, Evolver Editions, Berkeley, CA

What Plan B Fuller eco-comprehended
as an implied Universal First Principle of Positive Synergetic Balance:
all Primal Principles
must be universally informed,
comprehensive,
“cooperative” defined as ergodically and ionically regenerating full-fractal,
RNA-dynamically syntaxed,
to achieve integrative,
healthy,
Spaceship Earth cooperative wealth optimization,
as sustainability of positive life-trend energy,
form,
and revolutionary developmental design.

Economists and eco-nomists bilaterally recognize
production of newly commodifying need-systems
co-arises
with creation of consumptive/absorptive/nutritional evolution
of need v. want constellations and priorities.

The difference between a Plan A Competitive
Win-Lose assuming economist,
gamer,
strategist,
logician,
policy analyst,
weather forecaster,
and a Plan B Cooperative
Win-Win assuming eco-nomist,
gamer,
strategist and logician and linguist,
policy and planning co-analyst,
permacultural co-designer,
feminist eco-nomist,
sacred eco-logist,
weather forecaster,
is Left-Right dipolar balance as reverse correlated with cognitive dissonance,
deep-comprehension
of Win-Lose as suboptimizing health and wealth
compared to a double-negatively reiterating thermostat,
decompositional analysis trending,
reverse hierarchical tree,
of unfolding regenerative strings
including binary trend QBit 0=squared/fractal-centric time
of mutual subsidiarity positive-default comprehension
as Win-Win bicameral informational system’s
balancing ecological,
economic,
and permacultural uracil-yang/cytosine-yinyin
b-ionically deductive/inductive zeroistic design.

We can approach the further
related
question of optimizing Polynomial syntax and form and function
as equivalently and dipolar defined by -(-P),
binary RNA syntax
of analogical economic polynomial trend QBit
double/elliptical fractal rhythm and patterned balance.
We can approach this question
with fractally 0-squared digital information
as ecological trend analysis
with a dual hypothesis,
to see which is more productive
of a healthy and wealthy past,
present,
and future.

We could observe
rather summarily
that the proposition
“Polynomial Information
is non-equivalent to Not-Polynomial Information”
has been our scientific deductive and metric
analytically encultured eisegetical assumption,
leading to competitive irresolution
through our own default Win-Lose economics.
Here,
in this irrationally eternal place,
we cannot deductively explain
why some issues,
problems,
algorithms,
variables,
norms,
memes,
paradigms,
have resonantly resolvable solutions
and scientific revolutions
while others calculate their way through infinite time.

Which is which is rather like trying to separate Kuhnian primal revolutions
from more normatively diversifying-further-individuating-articulating
evolutions.

If, however,
we start with the heuristic assumption
that Polynomial spacetime universe =
nondually-transparenting N(NP),
where might this take us toward explaining
outstanding teleological,
economic,
ecological, and perhaps even cosmological
issues?

Cooperative Game Theory:
P-positive Win = (-,-) equivalent Win NP,
a positive draw,
anticipating an equally positive draw choice from nondual Other
is RNA-rooted naturally systemic,
with outcome to play both positively and cooperatively
as long as everyone chooses to play nice.

Group Binomial (0)-Soul Theory:
Explicate Convex Boundary +P = +(0)
Implicate (Bohm) Concave Double-Bound NP = -(-0).

And, so, to our deductively metric and commodifying friends
at Clay Math Institute,
at least the field of permacultural design
and all the cells of RNA heritage,
appear premised on a Zero-Binomial Assumption
that P-yangspace = N(NP)-yinyintime = +/-C ecosquared
as c-squared Universe equals e-squared Synergetic Balanced Integrity (Unitarian),
the balance of deductively formal light
with inductively flowing harmonic balance,
co-arising metaphysical form with intuitive eco-consciousness function.

Standard
Uncategorized

Creation of Sacred Needs

Sacred Time Seminary’s Professor of Economics
began her presentation on CoReGenesis Theory
“Even Business as Usual economists
would say that phonographs
and bulldozers
and all technology,
all information systems,
have enriched time,
creating new goods and services
that did not exist in prior times.”

On an ecologically deep profound level,
the consuming human needs
these diversely technological systems produce toward
are not new to permaculturally timeless time.
Technical systemic information
merely continued through time to meet permacultured needs
in a different way–
a way of borrowing decompositional loss
from future EarthTribe generations.”

Frustrated, and frustrating,
apt student of Business As Usual Cultural Systems
squirms with both affective and cognitive dissonance,
“I still don’t get exactly why
is it so systemically important
so strategically and logistically profoundly significant.
to comprehend your adage
‘Time, like all eco-normic systems,
only moves forward
as Eco-Centric Prime Relationship In-Formation.'”

Well yes,
responded Eco Professor YinYin,
and no.
Yes,
the ancient term “Tao”
does seem to contain richer nuances of biocultural meaning
than “Eco-Centri-Binomial Prime Relationship In-Formational Theory
of Ecosystemic Temporal Balance Zen-Zeroism Midway Theory
of UniversalYang-UnitarianYinYin Relativity.”

But, no,
I don’t think it is important
for you to memorize it like an algebraic formula,
I believe we have this comprehension
indelibly syntaxed into our DNA/RNA binomial life encryption pattern.
The rhythm of life is four seasonally,
and reasonably,
both deductively and intuitively accessible,
as fractally predictive of revolutionary systemic transitions
within our bicameral information systems themselves,
and as an EarthTribe,
similarly endosymbiotically
and philogenetically enscribed
toward the regenerativity of time’s economic unfolding
and refolding logical fractals.

Yes, yes,
I recall your rhythmed drill:
Without prior bionic negentropic P=N(NP) spacetime network balance,
no ionic balancing universe.
Without prior Brahmanic unitarian, double-bound negative equals positive
natural logic,
then no individual Atmans.
Without yang (P) Ecologic optimally balancing yin/yin (NNP)
then no YinYin Midway Buckminster Fullerian Geometric Systemic
Tipping Boson.

So glad you mentioned our UU Elder,
Professor Fuller.
Yes,
Bucky’s Synergetics, redefined:
+0 Core Vertex = -(-0)[double-bind constant “2” binary prime]) Core Vortex
Eulerian Prime Universal Relationship of Form’s Self-Regenerative Functionality.

Just as Dual-Transparent Cosmology
emerges confluently from +0 Dark Matter =
(-,-)0Dark Progenitive, yet co-arising, Energy of Light =
Universal Commons Metric Permacultural Zeroism Consciousness.

Just as Taoism foundationally premises, predicts,
+0 YangForm =
-(-0)YinYin Midway Double-flowing (reverse/inverse)
Temporally Metaphysical [not limited to Special Case systems]
Unitarian Function.

Just as Permacultural Systems Theory balances co-arising Regenerative Energy with Square-Rooted
4-equi dimensional,
dynamically decompositional co-gravitation
as RNA/DNA life systemic Prime Principle
of Thermodynamic Balance
within Reverse-Hierarchical Win-Win Gaming Systems
of self-optimizing perpetuity.

These diverse paradigms
each appears premised on this more primal assumption
that life and thought and language and ego-identity and consciousness
unfold and refold bi-nomially,
in a P=N(NP) universe
with metric ecological prime assumption default:
+Space = Double-bound (-) Time [nondually co-arising]
as +Mass = Double-transparent -(-0) Centric QBit Informating Network
Ec0PolypathicSoul Ergodic-Fractal Pattern.

Ec0Soul as our DNA ProGenitive Transparency
feels and comprehends
fuels and farms,
consumes and produces,
polyculturally beloved information systems.

“That resonates”
hoped our student of metasystemic permacultural relations.

 

Note: This piece opens with a paraphrase of Charles Eisenstein, pp. 79 and 80, and gains its title as well, from Sacred Economics: Money, Gift and Society in the Age of Transition, 2011. Any misrepresentations or distortions of Eisenstein’s truth are my error, and not intended to speak for Professor Eisenstein.

 

Standard