Author Archives: gdill52

Uncategorized

In My Dipolar Home

In my universal-Left and unitarian-Right bicameral home
“crazy” has two functions,
ballistic weapon Left
aimed Right at Other,
ballastic anchor Right
aimed with EgoSelf co-arising EcoOther.

“Crazy”
when that begins with “you are”
marginalizes
dispossesses nutritional powers of functionality
with dire political and economic consequences
of appropriate fear and anger,
even hatred for this Word itself.

“Crazy” ballast
begins with “I am”
and “we all are,
or could be,
or have been;”
a synonym for “Wild.”

“Wildness” hunts a dipolar antonym
for “domesticated”
like difference and sameness
of wild yeast
with domestic yeast.

“Domesticated”
a Left-dominant economist’s
overly reductive
deductive
and enthusiastic synonym
for “commodified,”
even “exegeticalized”
or “orthodoxed”
as true, and good and rational, and just,
found to function
with quantifiable domesticated values
for efficiency and effectiveness,
utility,
useful,
especially for continuing
our Win-Lose Left-brain dominating cultural game.

But, dear co-economists,
co-domestic politicians,
eco-logists, one and all inclusive
discerning languaged tribe of “crazy”,
what has become domesticated
remains primally as wild as RNA’s encryption,
syntax exegetically balancing regenerative harmonics
Nature’s ecosystemic-logic
will only permaculturally allow,
and polyculturally love,
synergize,
analyze,
decompose for future Wild’s balancing regenerational outcomes;
you know, kids, children, offspring,
new eggs from old nests.

Earth’s Tribes are wild crazy universal,
despite DNA’s uniting
and regeneratively cooperative economic understory
of perma-enculturating intent,
language,
deductive/inductive orthopraxis,
Left-Right co-arising hemispheric ecotherapy,
balancing Wild-Rational eco-full bicameral
dipolar [reverse co-relational] consciousness.

If Wild is not Universalist
then our political economics
could not evolve Unitarian.

Earth Rights
include rights to evolve dipolar balancing Wild-consciousness,
images,
imagination,
form with function,
incarnating ministries,
information,
inteligence,
RNA-fractal,
Zero-Soul timelessly TransParenting
Tree of Life Greets Death
Co-Messianic Exegenetically Rooted,
+/(-,-) [plus OVER bi-laterally negative self-bound logic as positive-inductive co-operating form/function/flow/frequency]
tri-temporal yangspace/not-not linear binomial yintime,.

YesYes!
+Yang,+Yang
Win-Win’s
YinYin
NotNot (-,- binary balance)
Thermodynamic Prime-Binary Gaming EcoBioSystemic Equivalence.

In My home
“crazy” evolves three functions:
One, to see who is winning (and when and where and hopefully why),
Two, to hear who is losing (when and where and hopefully why),
Three, to decompose this losing wildness
into its imaged dipolar opposite,
to co-mentor eco-wins thru EgoDeath’s
Plan B with A WinWin.

You heard it here
but I heard it first
way back in UU history.
Bilateral Zeroism as prime function
goes back at least to Bucky Fuller,
and One could be no more Plan B Universalist than he;
and he would be offended
if his UU cooperative co-creators
could not hear his “synergy” as Unitarian-istic “love”
and self/other wildly self-optimizing regenerative design
and permaculturally economic cooperative
co-arising Left-Right development.

Standard
Uncategorized

Primal Questions

I was thinking about Eisenstein’s view of our relationship with Earth as a sacred economic relationship with Beauty and Health (although the latter seems to be largely implied, but is more explicit in Riane Eisler’s highly compatible thought and concerns and hope). At the same time the statement “There is no excuse for ignorance.” (Jamie Dunmore?)

A few weeks ago I had been thinking about debt using the icon of a mortgage on one’s primary residence, and comparing this to questions  we might ask prior to considering to enter into any domestic relationship, investment of time. Now I find myself wanting to apply these questions to prospective vocations, and decisions about how to invest my life in abundantly beloved eco-consciousness, rather than more ignorance.

So, in that context, I revisit these questions, and would love to know if you also find them helpful for vocational and domestic relationships as also sacred political and economic relationships:

Do I want to only look at new ones,
never been used,
or is that a too restrictive market,
too competitively priced
for virginity of place and relationship on Earth?
And, is such redemptively-intended virginity
an asset or a deficit,
in which ways?

Could I rather shop in a wider market,
someplace more gently used
and well-maintained,
someplace with smooth natural wood and stone,
rich in character
and not the smell of fresh acrylic paint,
when I could have wisteria and roses
lavender and mint
wafting through those big brown
or blue
or grey
or hazel door and window frames.

If this prospective relationship
does not bring sanity and health and pleasure and beauty
then is that not a contract violation
and time to be thinking about separation
so Self and Others can get back into our confluent market
for a better fit with this Time;
not a decade ago?

Have my needs
and wants
and preferences changed,
while my life partner’s and vocation’s may feel
boxed in,
no more room for additions,
lack of flexible floor plan,
too big or too small?

It happens.

Have I changed my definition of paradise
“beloved community”
is not who I am still investing in.
My fellow pilgrims, and places, and their path,
seem entrenched in incompatibility.
They have grown older,
more cracks in the plaster,
wear in the not-so-natural rugs,
missing some shingles on the roof.
Does the view from outside
look more like a weedpatch,
than my intended investment in paradise?

While shopping used expands your permacultural potential,
it also brings its baggage.
All that good and/or bad karma
yours for a down payment
but not always part of what you bargain for.
Did I ask if anyone had ever been murdered here,
or how many toxic fantasies cast their shadows?
Is this place/person service/product/plant
swimming in carcinogens,
tumorous habits growing mold under the roof?
What is prior experience with abuse,
neglect,
deferred maintenance?

Do I have a right to know, to be informed? Could I ask prior co-habitors and contractors with a prospective position/vocation/place/person:

Why are the two of you going your separate ways?
Was this your decision or did it feel more like
your house/spouse/employer gave you no choice?
If it was your choice,
if you have moved on
to something more to your liking,
rather than merely running away
from a smelly situation,
then what does your current relationship
offer you
by way of contentment,
and peace,
with justice and beauty and health,
that is lacking in my prospective investment?

Perhaps there were reasons unrelated to your vocational satisfaction.
Maybe you couldn’t afford to stay any more?
Is this place/person high maintenance, do you think?
Too heavily taxing,
bleeding you through inflated costs of living,
working,
divesting,
dispossession of responsibility
and/or authority,
too much Win-Lose gaming?

Are there problems in the neighborhood/extended family
that I should know about?

Does the plumbing still work?

Are the lights on but nobody’s home?

Would you recommend your house/spouse/job
to your best in-the-market friend?
Why or why not?
What interior and exterior landscape and design issues
did you have?
What did you find were your interior and exterior relational strengths
for future development?
Knowing what you have learned
through your own investment experience,
who do you think would be the ideal partner
for this former place now in my face?

Too much information, or appropriate responsibility to be informed
of which economic and political incarnations we embrace?

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Death by Light

We each step into
then through
an isolating silo threshold
of Zero-static flatline,
EgoDeath counter-defining
EcoLove for timeless life.

EgoDeath
an opening
a return to dominating EcoOther
primal identity becoming cellularly disorganized,
sub-organically interdependent chaos,
whole-system universal body-as-mind
pointless-centric
Zero-RNA-fractal/square-root
of light (c = +P = +Yang = +Eulerian Prime Function)
comprehensively ecoconscious ex-formating telligence.

EgoDeath,
an invitation to faith
in
through
by
of
with TransParency of eco’s dark matter balancing dark energy.

EcoLove,
transparency of co-gravitational Time,
Zero-souled
(0)-summed Win-Win,
universally timeless quintessential uniting placeholder,
yang “dark” matter
shadowing hydrogen
as yinyin’s “dualdark” energy
implicately foreshadows helium’s understory
of Earth’s ancestral permaculturing Tree,
ergodically-ionically harmonic-rooted
fractally-seasonally-dynamically branching Time.

And,
with these decomposing definitions vaguely swirling in place,
EcoLove Yin turns to EgoDeath Yang
to race:
“Seems if you’re not messin’ with me
then you’re bleedin’ me blind,
and usually both…
But, when we play nice,
inside and out,
then we can’t imagine
why anybody would think or feel or even hope
they could sell this ecstasy
of EgoDeath.”

Standard
Uncategorized

Rise Up Islamic Sisters

Rise up
my African Sisters
speak your truths
of intimacy and death
internal monopolizations of feeling desperately dark
suffocating
with hatred and fear and anger
about your man,
your brother
about your here and now lack of relationship.

Listen up
Islamic Sisters
to these Sisters of Perpetual Wisdom
of self-and-other emancipation:

Husband,
your intimacy and passions
fill me with emptiness and longing
rather than fertility and belonging.

Husband,
you treat your milk cows
and that lazy ass dog with all her pups
better than you treat me.

Brother,
your fascination with hatred
technologies of deadly anger,
your greed for Lose-Lose attention
and respect
replace your comprehension of dignity
and producing life-giving outcomes
to regenerate attention,
interest,
consciousness of positive values
within our ancient culture, spirit, religion,
passing forward to our children’s hope and faith
balancing life with death,
in cooperative favor and support
for this deep ecological love
of intimacy and respect
and mutual cooperative hospitality,
we call “Allah” together
co-messiahs
linked through time and space
of regenerating hope.

Sisters
speak your international
yet intimate truths
of good and evil
life and death
regeneration of abundantly warm feelings
and decompositional analysis
of where your young men go so astray
of what is Islamic-normative
to be fully human
to become a man
worthy of our Splendid Sisters.

Author’s note:

Perhaps it is just me, and, if so, then I am about to expose my embarrassingly remedial ignorance once again. But, ISIS and all the “Islamic” hatred and anger of which they have become iconic, feels like an overwhelmingly young to middle-aged male dominated late adolescent cultural gasp reacting against the comparative freedom and wisdom of  a cooperative and egalitarian society with emergent strong polycultural values, whether tribal, or nationally, or even religiously, labeled.

If so, then perhaps Islamic women will peacefully engage their own cooperative internal revolution, speaking honestly and bravely and truthfully to their brothers, even their husbands, but probably not their fathers. That could get a girl killed in some unfortunate places where Allah’s sense of inclusive faithfulness and solidarity as sacred Host feels climatically absent in this suffering time.

Standard
Uncategorized

Allah and Buddha were Talking

You know what I think sometimes?
said Allah to Buddha,
Of course you do
and yet you don’t.

I think I gave this gift of language
because you have a uniquely humanatured gift
of comprehending
and transposing
and translating languages thru-out each and all Earth tribes,
but primally amongst your anthro-Allah loving selves.

Buddha thinks
we under-invest using this cooperatively intended gift
to speak clearly
and honestly
with candid integrity
about what “I need”
and what “I really do not need more of,
or any longer.”

Perhaps at work
in your vocation
you get along fairly confluenty,
most folks act professionally
and politically
and socially
and economically
and ecologically
and healthily correct.

Yet, notice
next time
perhaps even within yourself,
within your family,
with your spouse,
with your kids
especially with those teenagers,
how much time do we invest
prattling happily
and sometimes ranting unhappily along
about what we want or wish for,
don’t want and would never care to see
or hear
again;
now compare to your investment
conversing about what you most need
and what you most critically,
yet also chronically,
most specifically do not need
in your healthy intended and practiced life,
and in your death-trending non-life
of falsely wealthy abundance.

We might turn to our professional colleague at work
say “I could use a cup of coffee.”
but we would probably never say,
“I need more stimulants in my system
or this situation will put me to sleep.”

We might say to our oppositionally obsessed daughter,
“If you throw that one-eyed Zoe doll down the stairs again
in the middle of this clunky throbbing night,
you can predict her immediate demise
in the trashcan of life!!!”
but seldom think to say
“I need for us to figure out a less alarming way
for you to wake me
when you need my attention.”

Why are we more comfortable
telling our life partners,
“I don’t feel like it tonight”
and less comfortable adding,
“but a back and foot and scalp massage would be heaven.”

Seems like we would all be somewhat healthier
wealthier
and wiser
if we were more articulate
about our bodies’ “need” language
while less reductively focused on
our little ego’s cognitive “want”
“don’t want” messages.

And, for that matter,
Allah adds
it might be nicer
if your national and global political conversations
followed this same trend
of ecological body integrity
with Buddha-mind communication patterns.

Rather than
“If you keep killing those innocent victims,
I’m going to spank you
and starve you.”
as if you had not had quite enough of both
rather than co-mentored love,
what about,
“I do not need you to lead us toward more death.
I do need you to do what we elected
and supported
and expected you to do,
to facilitate positive health and wealth trends
for me
and all Earth’s Tribes,
for life,
and all Time’s incarnating needs for health right now,
through future’s timeless generations,
positively trending outcomes
rooted in needs and not needs,
not-so-much about what you want
and don’t want
for your small-minded exclusive future.”

Our global Buddha body,
Earth as Sanghakaya
multisystemic incarnational economics of ecojustice,
evolves religious and cultural sanity
screaming for cooperative healing
while speaking PC
through appropriate channels
how nice we could all be
through competing for wealth
by following Allah’s nature and nation-building rules
of healthy reason,
inclusive organic seasons without threat of treason.

Our bodies need to compete cooperatively
even more than our minds want
to cooperatively compete.

It                       We
IS                       ISn’t
crazy                  sane
to                        not to
kill                      communicate
against               with
those                   you
“Allah                “Allah creation
has                       has not
created”              destroyed”
without               with
first                      terminally
sharing                killing
Allah                    Allah creation’s
beauty and joy   ugly and sorrow
hospitality           ballistics
generosity            competitive selfishness
integrity.               mendacity.

When economic and/or ecological interest
in ego
exceeds equivalent value
for economic interest
and comprehensive coverage
in eco-healthy wealth optimization,
then ego mind
operates out of cognitively dominant “want”
messages
rather than bodily-centered “eco-need”
messages,
rich environmental responses,
and healthy dialogue
of about and for optimizing life trends.

How could we incarnate
create
regenerate
economic or psychic wealth and health
not eco-logically balanced,
positively trending toward “beloved”
or “climax”
wealthy-health nutritional optimization
meeting Continuous Quality Improvement
Permacultural Standards
of Positive Design
and universally-uniting Development?

And, even if we could,
Buddha body would hate it
and Western mind
would disrupt into further cognitive-reductive dissonance,
rather than this emerging eco-consciousness
of Allah’s incarnate mind.

Standard
Uncategorized

Just Show Up

Basic Attendance,
listening deeply to the sounds
and functions
flows and forms of nature’s voices,
evolves from enthymematic roots
toward mutually repellent,
darkly transparent
nondual dark energy
as equivalently empowered identity
of not-yet fully synergetically integrated
diastatic Time,
equivocating spatially incarnated
positive
protonic
polymorphic
polypathic
polycultural
multisystemic harmonic balance
between Yangstimuli and Yinresponse.

From this epicenter of Basic Attendance,
we begin noticing our over-commodified
overly-preserved
overly-defensive
over-canned
cultural economy
habitually uses financial currency
as the measure of wealth,
while using nutritional currency
as our measure of health.

Hmmm. That happens. And?

When we must choose between health and thrival
or competitive individual and familial accumulation of wealth-survival objectives,
we are likely to return to healthy survival of Earth
and all species
as ultimate measure of a culture’s wealth
and we are each a DNA-informed culture.
At least,
that appears to be our routine positive behavior
after the tsunami
the tornado
the hurricane
the financial earthquake
the critical interruption of Business As Usual
vacates our normatively competitive economies
and ego identities.

So what?

Racism,
and sexism
and class-ism, segregation-ism,
and elitism
and ageism
and capitalism,
is an evolutionary dead end tributary of evolution
that could only become an issue
emerging from an ego-centric Left-brain dominant species.
We invest in supremacist (and sometimes ballistic) elitism
when we assume human nature somehow evolves more elite
and privileged
and value-capital invested
than our anawim, our untouchables, our aliens, our enemies
without concomitant responsibility
and risk
and opportunity
to remember and remain within eco-centric ballast.

Western red skies
predict Trinitarian Yang/spatial In-Formation,
co-arising Eastern dawn of Basic Attendance nondual culture;
positively bilateral YinYin temporal-timeless function.

Basic Attendance meets Primal Dysfunction:
Our economic lifestyle and choices
either lean toward cooperating with Time’s unfolding wisdom,
sometimes called karmic flow of sacred grace,
or we can continue to over-invest in competing
to possess larger and larger responsibilities
for monopolizing quantities of life’s time.
Plan A is Win-Win eco-logic.
Plan B is Lose-Lose ego-dislodging competitive
self-enslavement
irrationality
collective insanity masking rich opportunities within
Basic Attendance to Time’s Polycultural Nature.

Standard
Uncategorized

AnthroLanguage

Language
like poetry
becomes our inclusive
yet ego-ionic
Teacher.

Our four seasons
of ecological reason,
a fractal Commons
rooted in Time’s folding/unfolding RNA/DNA
syntax of autonomic intuition,
feeling and inspiration of truth with beauty,
permacultural design
and organic development.

Differences between bipolar dissonance
and dipolar co-arising resonance,
at end of each eco-therapeutic day
and life,
may simmer down
to which side of our therapeutically inclusive desk
you sit and identify behind.

Standard
Uncategorized

Professor Glory’s Active Hope

The title of this talk today,
“Win-Win Politics of New Feminist Economics”
suggests questions,
more than emasculating
definitively deductive
reductive
answers.

Would you imagine
a minority-identified Buddhist,
more likely as a feminist
or culturally comfortable
with political and economic Left-brain domination,
monopolistic-competitive enslavement?

How would you compare broad cultural trends
between East and Western language
on a feminist v. Left-brain monopolistic dominant spectrum?
Which might be more ego-centric,
and which would you expect to be more eco-centric?
Where would you expect to find more
competitive v. cooperative economic support structures?
Which would you expect to be more family-tribal-clan oriented
and which more individualistically ego-oriented?
Which more anthropocentric
and which more nurturant of all life centric?

Who is more likely to be a feminist-cooperative economist,
a Permaculture Designer
or a Political Party Platform Developer?
Why do you imagine our world in this comparative
relative
way?

As a cooperatively intended illustration
of discovering political relativity
within an economic bicameral lens,
let’s compare our sacred colleague Charles Eisenstein’s
description of “The Growth Imperative”
with a bracketed revision
which might be entitled “A Regenerative Imperative.”
This, not to suggest disagreement,
but to suggest dipolar co-arising confluence
through using both Left and Right lenses of consciousness:

“Abetted by technology, the commodification of formerly non-monetary goods and services has accelerated over the last few centuries, to the point today where very little is left outside the money realm.”
[Abetted by double-binary balancing technology,
the decommodification of newly-commodified goods and services
is accelerating
over these last few decades,
to the point today
where surprisingly little is left
monopolistically
inside the overly competitive quantification of value realm.]

“The vast commons, whether of land or of culture, has been cordoned off and sold–all to keep pace with the exponential growth of money.”
[Our Commons of land and culture
and genetic-holonic individuation
continues ego- and anthro-centrically self-strangling
through dispossession of cooperative ownership–
all to keep pace with
the exponential monopoly of quantifying-reductive value,
distorting nurturant health as core-wealth.]

“This is the deep reason why we convert forests to timber, songs to intellectual property, and so on.”
[This is the deep ecology of why we permaculturally harvest forests
for timber,
culturally nurture songs toward cooperative intellectual property,
and so on,
yin toward yang balancing evolution.]

“It is why two-thirds of all American meals are now prepared outside the home.”
[It is why two-thirds of all American meals
are now less nurturantly prepared
outside our under-valued
nutritionally-potentiating organic homes and lives.]

“It is why herbal folk remedies have given way to pharmaceutical medicines, why child care has become a paid service, why drinking water has been the number-one growth category in beverage sales.”
[We, together, are why herbal folk remedies
could further enrich pharmaceutical medicines,
from which they originally derived,
why child care has become a paid
yet under-valued
service,
why bottled and labeled drink of nature’s primally flowing health
has become the number-one competitive growth category
in what used to be
the Commons egalitarian river-flow of life.]

While we each have internalized theories
about what positive and negative correlations
we evolve between Left-deductive dominant
v. feminist-egalitarian values and disvalues,
co-relations only recently occurred to me
as what co-operative political assumption
feminist-ecologist-economist culture
may share as ubiquitously as individuated DNA
co-gravitates toward universal RNA syntax.

Buddhist, and Taoist, philosophy
calls dipolar correlations
“dependent co-arising”
while scientists may share this same principle
of thermodynamic,
electromagnetic,
and gravitational
co-elliptical curve-linear temporal balance
“endo/ecto-symbiotic evolution.”

As inclusive theoretical physicists
and mathematicians
and statisticians
we might re-member political mutuality
of species evolution
as co-relation,
co-operation,
coincidental trend emergence
between two or more
interdependent dipolar-articulating trend variables.

Buckminster Fuller
labeled his entire geometric metaphysics of consciousness
and ecological development
after this primal principle
of interdependent co-arising “synergetics,”
steering
and re-ligioning
and re-cognizing
synergy is to physics
as love is to metaphysics,
and perhaps economics
and eco-logic,
health and well-being,
co-operative Positive Psychology,
design and development ethics and organic health/wealth outcomes,
which begins to feel
like ethical policy development,
useful for a healthier political
and conversational
and familial
and ego/ecosystemic
balancing process.

Where I did not anticipate discovering
mutually-dependent co-arising cooperation
was in the Prime-Origin field of Cosmology,
although a cursory glance at mythology,
shamanic teaching,
taoist co-existential paradox of evolving Yang/Yin principles
within nature
inclusive of human nature,
predicating male/female functional co-arising
and natural balance;
these were all,
in hindsight,
significant clues saying
“please don’t be surprised
when you get to universally unitarian cosmology
as double-transparent co-gravitation of our Commons.

Dual transparency of Time
as Zero-dimensional negentropicentric space
bicamerally suggests
co-operative gravitational power politics and economics
lie at the (0)-Soul Core Prime Relationship
of our global Origination Story.

Interdependent co-arising revolutions
continue unfolding
into our political lap
during this endangered
Cooperative Transitional Generation.

Note: Charles Eisenstein quotes from p. 101, Sacred Economics, 2011, Evolver, with deep eco-logical gratitude and eco-normic respect.

Standard
Uncategorized

Professor Yangyinstein’s Agenda

The Professor’s campaign
although stealthily benign
still co-arose fair hecklers.

How can you reassure me
that our vulnerable children
will not hate me
and you
for stealing from all Earth’s tribal presence,
and any possibility of healthy future?

While Yangyinstein stood stunned
with wonder
about all the possibilities singing such reassurance

What I must know right now
from you who would lead us
not just through your permaculturally policied principles
of systemic process with polyculturally beloved results,
but also concretely through these next four years,
what is your cooperative political
and economic experience with
your family
your neighborhood
your established constituency of mutual healthy-wealth?
How is your EcoTribe
informed by pursuit of wealth as inclusive health,
by richly nutritious optimization choices and deliberative process,
moving you away from Business As Usual,
Win-Lose familiar,
even familially familiar for some,
strategies toward suboptimizing competitive investments,
invented by deductive-reductive Left-brain dominant enslavement.

Before the final “t” had echoed,
a pithy shot from Left to Right:

Please let us not settle for winning now
by choosing policies dissonant with global
through local
positive synergetic eco-consciousness, now.

Professor’s mind reeling
with all this yinyin feeling
so appealing beyond reasons
unpeeling within their best seasons
of karma-roots growing grace-flowers.

When from the weasel stealthy back
yin wilted with guilt on the edge of our forest,
self blame,
too comfortable with living only halfway
within this United Upper 5% of Consumers,
stealing 28% of time’s encrusted fossil investment
as if by collective right
as if without loss irreparable to the 95% co-repressingly unhealthy
today
and the 100% of future life generations
born nearly bankrupt
of healthy economic and ecologically wealthy trends
suffering from our eco-pathological
Left-brain enslaving dominatrix
increasingly autistic and withdrawn
bender,
over-investing in high risk eco-dislogical Win-Lose
economic assumptions
not supported by endosymbiotic co-enculturating functions
of Time’s regenerative evolution.

Reiterative echoes rang through Yangyinstein’s bicameral ears
speaking bilateral timelessness
in confluent co-gravitation of transparent harmony,
yang Left deductive languaged
yin Right inductive syntaxed:

My mind grows tired
endless self-referencing loops
language
voices.
As my body co-arises
endless SelfOther referencing rituals
and permacultural practices,
breaths and heart beats and wind songs
nature’s beauty and wholeness sounds
of warm confluent sap
richly remembered river
confluently flowing syntax, DNA-opti-nomial balanced.
Your body only speaks
languages of wisdom and suffering dissonant pain,
but your mind listens through metrically regenerative syntax;
PolynomialPositive P grows Left-dominant deductive
WHILE
NotNot Polynomial’s RNA-Right Roots remain dominant inductive
autonomic-aptic/synaptic balanced
AND
all the above is Left-brain language
for Right-brain comprehension;
Yang = P
OVER
NotYin + NotYin = N(NP) double-transparently celled cosmology.
Tao as Time’s Bilateral Regenerative Balance
toward Binary/Binomial/Bilateral Co-Arising Eco-Consciousness.
What you thought of as “evil”
is stealthy weasel medicine of reversing “live”s syntax
and icons
and ions
for decompositionally imaginative
and intuitively predictive
purposes,
dream-dancing our revolutionary understory
of bicameral dissonance
between PricklyYangs and GooeyYins.

Professor listened deeply
to speak to Business As Competitively Left-brained Usual:

“I hope it is clear how this [our] story
maps onto the real economy
[of our timeless political-relational religion].
Because of [Win-Lose strategic] interest,
at any given time
the amount of money [spiritual/physical value] owed
is greater than
the amount of money [value] already existing.
To make new money [metaphysical value]
to keep the whole [physical] system going,
we have to breed more chickens [commodities],
we have to create more ‘goods and services’
[and/or create a higher cooperative quality].
The principal way of doing so
is to begin selling something
that was once free
[through all of Time, to share in Commons of Earth’s Tribe].
It is to convert
[yinyin] forests into [yang] timber,
[yin] music into [yang] product,
[yin] ideas into [yang] intellectual property.
[yin] social [cultural relational] reciprocity
into [yang] paid services [economic transaction reductionism].”

But, this EarthTribe Body,
with confluent bicamerally balancing mind,
hears and proposes platforms and parties
of endless SelfOther Win-Win rituals
and practices,
breaths and heart beat meditation medication,
bird songs and eco-logic of healthy wealth
nature’s echoing beauty and wholeness sounds
of warm permacultural confluence
richly remembered as confluent syntax,
DNA/RNA regenerative balance
outweighing cognitive/affective dissonance
and overly anxious settling for assonance
where full polycultural harmonics
rest
just waiting to sing their tipping points
more loudly.

Your voices with mine,
that is our agenda.
Your voices without mine,
that is my politically economic self-optimizing agenda
to hear and harmonize
regeneratively.

 

Note: Quote is from Professor Charles Eisenstein, pp. 100-1, Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition, 2011, Evolver. A most enlightening read for those who buy toilet paper and coffee all the way through those engaged in political process to build cooperative economic networks. Verse format and comments within brackets are mine, and not intended to be other than cooperative embellishment to what already shines alone. There is also at least an implied hint here about how I believe a permacultural designer and developer of systems might respond to the Clay Math Institute’s P v NP issue. I believe time’s co-gravitational response is that P=N(NP) as space-concave is to bilaterally co-arising time-convex. At a deep Left-Right hemispherically balanced deduct/induct resonance level of eco-consciousness, I suspect we all autonomically/neurally believe that Positive Exterior is equivalent to its Double-Negative Interior Landscape, as this is the syntax of RNA’s unfolding/refolding form with function.

Standard
Uncategorized

Professor Weasel’s Weaving Game Theory

The object of life’s cooperative game,
began Professor Weasel
in his low-voiced stealthy ways,
is to continue deferring to Others
with mutually subsidiary
positive intention
to co-arise Win-Win.

We only know life’s regenerative game
has become more monoculturally Win-Lose,
when we are no longer offered a turn to play.
Until that time,
we default with positive psychological intention
toward Win-Win heuristic assumption
that Win-Win is appositional confluence
of systemic logic and strategy,
while Lose-Lose is cognitive dissonance
of chaotic random absence.

That our game continues
becomes permaculturally
and then polyculturally,
benign Win-Win reassurance
of ego/eco-conscious balance.

That our game continues lop-sided
becomes permaculturally threatening
to Win-Lose evolutionary theories
unable to explain regenerative revolutions
of life’s continued gaming story.

Standard