Uncategorized

Citizens DisUnited

Awhile back,
in the Dred Scott decision,
SCOTUS denied rights of citizenship
to people of color
“as a subordinate
and inferior class of beings,
who had been subjugated
by the dominant race…”

So, we need not dig too deeply
to rediscover where straight white male supremacists
and systemic racist allies
might find our strongest
most toxic heritage
language
beliefs
lack of inclusive discernment,
absence of multicultural intelligence
united citizens experience,
values of all people
for all creatures here below.

Anyway,
with this precedent in place,
we might similarly nuance the Citizens United language,
giving corporations the rights of citizenship
without the responsibilities of healthy stewardship,
authority to buy media speech
and heavily invest in purchasing political competitions;

This right more transparently unveiled
as the authority of a superordinate
and superior class
of capital-acquiring beings,
masters of organic Earth’s climate degeneration
who have subjugated the unstraight
unwhite
unmale
suffering from non-elite lack of multiculturally appreciated face,
too slow race,

These assumptions
of who is SWM better than whom,
rooted in outworn
and unhistorical
and supremacist
win/lose environmental theories,
blossom as further toxic prejudice
against Earth’s primordial health rights
and humane responsibilities
to repair damages,
restore peace of natural/spiritual
left/right
west/east
north/south cultural hemispheres
of resonant geopolitical balance.

Standard
Uncategorized

Failures of Integrity

I feel like a high school civics class dropout.

So much confuses me,
to this day,
about democratic constitutional law,
which feels like it should have WinWin original empowerment intent,
about public and private rights,
protected against others’ immoral and illegal, unhealthy wrongs of infringement,
and why we invest so much of our gross,
and I mean really Gross,
nationalistic produce
in what could not possibly be public health outcomes.

If governments are not for liberating and defending public health
then how could we realistically hope for those constitutionally promised deliverables:
well-being,
happiness,
prosperity?

Obviously I missed the day
when our high school civics and U.S. history teacher
explained the complex relationships
between public health
and growing democratic
interdependent
WinWin trust.

And truth,
and public service life,
and healthy-wealthy ways
of building a resilient
ecologically invested
economically smart
society.

For example,
how did the Supreme Court buy into the argument
that corporations have the right to buy and sell candidates for public office
because, if they didn’t,
then our legislative regulators
would thereby unconstitutionally restrict
their rights of free speech
as stipulated by our First Amendment?

I have the right to speak up for the public health benefits of marijuana
as compared to alcoholic beverages,
but do I have a first amendment right to purchase, carry, and consume marijuana?

In communications theory,
we differentiate between what is linguistic performance
and what is not speech
but non-verbal action,
investment,
divestment.
Why would that distinction not apply to the First Amendment
for white privileged patriarchal corporations
and yet does seem to apply for just regular persons
like you and me?

I have the right to speak out for white nationalism.
I could even argue that the abolition of slavery
was an unconstitutional taking of personal property,
but that would not give me the right to go out and buy a person,
not even a candidate for public cooperative WinWin wealth service.

It obviously was my misunderstanding
that the First Amendment protection of personal
(not incorporated) rights
is restricted to free speech and peaceful assembly.

Now I’m trying to wrap my Left and Right Brain around
First Amendment incorporated rights to buy and sell governing authority,
rights to buy and sell democratic trust commitments
to responsible
and accountable
and transparently free choice-speaking and democratic health investing,
rights to buy and divest of cooperative cultural integrity
to robustly serve in our public health sector
for equal and interdependently informed,
unformed,
exformed,
formed,
reformed,
preformed personal (not incorporated) voices
unwilling to buy and sell pro-organic healthy resilient lives.

I keep going back to historic constitution development notes
about this resonant rhetorical First Amendment,
trying to find a strict conservative defense of original intent
that might responsibly, and healthily, stretch enough
to include corporate freedom to peacefully purchase public assemblies
and rent free-market corporate spokespersons
for Win/Lose choices
supporting short-term capital returns
against ecological-organic long-term democratic healthy climate services
predicting nothing but further Lose/Lose patriarchal retributive injustice
as everyday capital-hoarding
democratically unusual
cynical and nihilistic privileged market freedom
for inordinate inhumane over-investment
in enslaving otherwise reasonably healthy minds
and public spirits
and trusting natures
for freely communicating democratically resilient health services.

Anyway,
when I was in graduate school,
studying political philosophy,
and integral multicultural wealth-of-health design,
we learned corporate investment in partisan political processes
as a private sector unhealthy opportunity
to grow white privileged economic buy and sell colonialism,
sponsored and supported by xenophobic unhealthy minds.

Which feels rather distant
from protecting our informed rights
to free and robust speech
and peaceful assembly
within and among this public service
promoting resiliently wealthy eco-logical,
unincorporated ego-therapeutic,
diversely nonsectarian,
interdependent integrity
of these healthy uniting WinWin States.

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Restoring Supreme HealthJustice

My litmus test question
for supreme and more everyday justice makers
organic bakers
RealTime fakers:

Have you read research results
comparing retributive justice unhealthy outcomes
to those of good-faith restorative
cooperative
justice processes?
Repairing green reparations
rather than locking up long-held repressive sexist lies
and throwing away liberty’s dwindling healthy discernment key
ring of bilateral co-passionate consciousness.

Could you justify voting against abortions
for those you have raped and pillaged
and still wear the mask of restoring justice
for all broken minds and embodied hearts?

When restorative criminal justice
invites and complies with WinWin peace-filling standards,
how much greater the legal-moral constitutional system
inviting and complying with transparent WinWin democracy
standards of and for co-operating health
with wealth
rather than
ego-eco anti-therapeutic lack of mutual invitation

Leaving rapacious room for anthro-centric stages
of monoculturing punishment,
retribution,
revenge
less sacred
and more secular locking up wild ecofeminist creativity
passionate restoring nativity

For historical Win-Lose evolutionary naivety
supplanting cultural Win-Win SpaceTime relativity.

Standard
Uncategorized

Original Intent of PostRevolutionary Constitutions

The ugly head of the Original Intent issue
co-arises with what were our ForeFather Patriarchal Patriots
thinking and feeling to leave out prohibitions against antiChristian degeneracy,
and to put in permissions for antiChristian degeneracy.

No.
Wait.
That’s not right.
We could not have inherited EnlightenmentEra Democracy’s Constitutional Law to intentionally include permissions for antiChristian degeneracy.

What about slavery and addiction and sexual impurities and perversions and abortion and prostitution?

Well, they weren’t necessarily understood as antiChristian degeneracy at the time,
although not necessarily proChristian regeneracy either.
These were personal and family issues, primarily among the proletariat, preferably.
NonElite domestics and small farmer-gardeners, hardy outdoors men, and their faithful wife-matriarchs of quiet integral embryonic Wisdom Councils over the back fence
about what the crazy Old White Men of theirs were up to now
with their post-revolutionary enlightenment
full-of-their cooperatively invested ecopolitically regenerative-positive selves;
making USA Beloved SacredCommunity babies.

Here we stand once again in the Supreme Court of US History,
to reconsider our Holy Constitutional Scripture’s Original Intent.

Once again
we will not be surprised that Fundamentalist Conservatives
will read the voice of the Strict Stern Patriarchal WinLose
LeftBrain Dominant EgoIdentified Capitalist,
while Radical Progressives read the Original voice of Lady Liberty
and all her post-revolutionary unwashed proletariat
multiculturing
raggedy
nonWhite poor refugees from alien threats
to domestic health and safety
are our Uniting States opportunity to integrate regenerative treats
for both domestic and global health and safety.

Original Intent view of Constitutional Law
depends on whether you stop at the RedState LeftBrain competitively dominant lens,
or move one step deeper
into Blue/Red BiCameral NotNot RightBrain
cooperating your bifocal health/wealth maturation.

Those words, “Fundamentalist-Red” and “Radical-Blue”/Green Aqua UltraViolet Crystal-Fractal Octave (0) dipolar coarising echo-strings of history’s matriarchal ecofeminist Original Intent Herstory/UnderStory
of GaiaEarth nature-spirit nondualisms
West/East
Ego/Eco
Left/Right DiPolar CoProductive
Secular/SacredElder ReGenerativity
Patriarchal Strength /Matriarchal Flow
Yang/Yin
Fire/Water
Earth/Climate-EcoLandscape
West/East
Ego/Eco dominant/colonized-commodified…

FundamentalistLeft Dominant and RadicalRight Repressed,
are ecologically complex,
dense with polypathic dipolar co-arising health-wealth integrity,
and nutritious Original Intent Opportunity for Mutually Assured WinWin Thrival
or WinLose Assured Destruction.

Original Constitutional Ecological Intent of ReGenerative Health,
USA, as cooperatively elsewhere,
for mutual well-being,
post-revolutionary constituted regenerative health-cooperative progress
toward global-interdependent wealth safety, contentment.

Radical PositivePositive WinWin-Only Yang-Matriarchal/Patriarchal EquiValence,
where Yang is US ConservativeRed Patriotic Original Intent,
with Yin’s Progressing Blue/Green climate integrating,
reweaving,
decomposing of ecological gaps and fissions in-between Patriarchal EitherOr Original Intent,
appositional space of silence and absence of therapeutic purpose within our Original not-quite-Holistic-Constitutional EcoPolitical Intent.

How could it be more LeftBrain health and safety Original Intent
to speak primarily to fellow WinWin cooperative Fundamentalist Conservative
CoInvestors in Continental Fertility and Longevity
and to Radical Libertarian Early EcoFeminist EarthEnlightenment nondualists,
reweaving natural and spiritual ecologically healthy nurturing dynamics,
suspiciously and strangely fascinated,
in this PostRevolutionary Enlightenment Moment of Planning and Designing Constitutionally Democratic-Organic Law
with and of and for new hybrid multiculturalism of SocialSecular-Moral Contract Faith
in cooperativity of ego/ecopolitical, nature-ElderSacred, evolution
over egocentric too-Yang overshoot not-sustainable continuing pre-revolutionary antipathic feelings of elitist-entitlement mistrust,
but here-in Western WhiteMale Patriarchal Christians as gun-rights citizens,
while all else were Originally Intended to cooperate with their Constitutional CoOperating Intent, without rights to vote
or have guns, for that matter.

Who wrote the U.S. Constitution
and who wrote the Bible?
When and why?
Who was the author(s) primary enforce-and-regenerate audience,
also with health and safety Original Intent,
and not-so-much degenerative-pre-revolutionary colonized
and owned
and commodified
and abused and neglected by aristocratic bourgeois royalist plutocratic WinLose LeftBrain Dominating Natural-Moral Law Original Intent.

What is the Constitutional post-revolutionary problem
and/or opportunity
that multiculturally and bicamerally motivated
this particular Humanely-Divinely Inspired Constitutional Scripture
at this time of both Exodus from Plutocratic-Elitist-Supremacist-Patriarchal Rule
and ReGenesis toward PostRevolutionary Enlightenment?
Economic Cooperative Health as also Politically Enlightened Interdependent Wealth,
hybrid historical-cultural Original Intent Frame
of and for ReGenerative Constitutional Health/Wealth Intent.

What is primal Original Intent purpose of any sustainable ecopolitical languaged and self-conscious memory system,
Constitution?
HumaneDeductive LanguagedLeft
equivalent with DivineSacred Ecological-Yintegrity
PolyPathic Trust/Distrust Right,

ReGenerative/DeGenerative
West = East(East) nondual double-bind notnot
BiLateral BeLoved Vertical/Horizontal
wave-linear
spiraling octaves of full-chromatic
ergodic
fertile
healthy deep matriarchal EcoBiLateral WellBecoming.

Standard
Uncategorized

Constitutional Rights and Wrongs

An attorney friend of mine once said,
We have two opposing views
of the hows and whys of law and time and natural evolution,
including natural law,
and including U.S. Constitutional Law.

One assumes both natural and spiritual nondual legal obligations
to invite and respond to the friends of our allies
as our potentially cooperative friends,
unless proven to be too contrary,
competitive WinLose.

This is the type of lawyer,
and parent,
and friend,
and fellow-resident of Earth,
neighbor,
democratically multicultural-is-positive voter,
I intend to become
with every breath both Yang-out deductive of Yin-inductive-concave,
with every heartbeat both Yang-flow out toward diastatic climax
and Yin reverse toward aptic-static
to begin again,
with every day and nightmare,
with ever week and month and year
of this,
our Positive PolyPathic Ground
and Air and Fire and Water of Becoming
CoRevolutionaries of Moral Secular/Sacred
ReGenerative EgoHealth/EcoWealth
Yang/Yin EcoPolitical Integrity
nondual
co-arising…

Then there are my more amusing, and sometimes terrifyingly unwell, BusinessAsUsual WinLose LeftBrain Dominant types
of lawyers
and parents
and voters,

The enemy of my friends
is probably also my competing ecopolitical enemy,
therefore I shall play
Mutually Assured LoseLose Condemning Belittling Bullying Destruction,
perhaps by aiming first at Islamic NationStates
owning oil and civil and climate unrest.

We shall assume WinLose normative legal ethics
and yet also RightBrain remembers this assumption’s ecological conclusion
is most nihilistically, merely secularly,
reductively, merely naturally,
to Lose sacred dignity of both life and death,
to become a merely entropic dissonant future
absence of health and safety regeneration.

Despite this understory of irritating belief-faith dissonance,
I choose LoseLose Mutual Destruction
perhaps because no one sufficiently mentored
what it could promise to continue cooperatively within our larger
WinWin Earth HealthAsWealth Herstoric Narrative
about how to act and speak and design and plan and game for
mutually cooperativizing
integrating
multiculturing
regenerative-optimizing
reproductive/decomposing moral-normative
PatriarchalYang EcoLogically Deductive
Diastatically Rational
enlightenment inspired
U.S. Constitutional (0)Riginal Ego/EcoBalancing EcoPolitical
ReGenerative Yang/DeGenerative YinSquared Inductive (0)-OverSoul,
neural-fractal flowtrend correlational-appositional co-arising,
Earth-ReGenerative HealthWealth,
natural and spiritual
and legal and moral and normative
and biological and ecological and ecosystemic
and imperatively
Taoist SpaceTime EarthRights-and-Wrongs Intent.

My Legal Counselor said,
Mother Earth is my healthiest and most nutritiously balanced
most functionally organic-cooperative
LegalAid EcoFeminist Doctor of Natural/Moral Constitutional ReGenerative Law
and Executive Orders,
about friends of friends as friends WinWin assumptions,
he himself both naturally and spiritually
emerged from,
and of,
and for,
and with,
and toward.

I so wish he had run for CoOperative President
of Mutually ReAssuring ReGenerative Health and ReProducing WinWin Safety,
committed to enforcing a Constitutional Law
most nutritiously and organically rooted in WinWin-only choice-making,
assuming friends of friends are friends,
rather than more of the same old
I’m Not Listening!
because I can’t stop talking about my FearMongering ParanoidEgo SelfIdentity,
so I’m issuing this memo from
ME: CEO of These United WinLose Corporations
TO: All bicamerally functional WinWin Civil Servants,
constitutionally self-identifying your LeftEgo/RightEco consciousness
for optimizing health and safety cooperative investment futures:

Always assume the enemies of all our allies,
(and I might be SuperPatriotically sure that our
‘Allies’ probably are quickly becoming a set of None, Zero,…
I’m feeling really conflicted about WinLose economics v politics
within our NATO strategy–
more logical to go WinLose separatist-fascist)…
As I was LeftBrain saying,
Always assume WinLose strategic competition is best for health and safety outcomes,
rather than continuing with the Constitutional
Evolutionary Historical Evidence
supporting a more organic Network of InterDependent CoOperation
toward One HealthySacred Body of ReGenerativity,
and away from DeGenerate Supremacies of State
WinLose Disempowerment of Liberty for All.

I suspect those more WinLeft BothAnding WinRight optimized
toward Ego/Eco Balancing patriotic civil service,
not uncivil disservice,
will have constitutional issues
with how such WinLose Assumptions of Mutual Destruction
resonates with US Constitutions
of Original WinWin EcoPolitical CoOperative Intent,
that friends of friends are also WinWin assuming and inviting friends
in NonDualist Enlightenment,
both West and East Philosophical
about ThermoDynamics of EcoPolitical YangConserving/YinProgressing
Nurturing-Integrity of Health and Safety Global thru Universal Intent.

May BioSystemic-ReGenerative EarthHearts forgive my friend,
the WinWin EcoTherapeutic Attorney
and Parent
and Voter as Breather and BiCameral Heart-Beater,
for not having spoken
as resonantly as he positive-health polypathically practiced
resolved
regenerated
reproduced these thoughts with feelings of co-empathic well-being.

Are we here to help each other toward more cooperatively healthy-regenerative lives?
Or do we still WinLose compete to persuade each other of why we cannot all WinWin together,
which is why we originally came to each other
to figure out how to do.

Will you only tell me why I EitherOr can’t;
or also add why we BothAnd could regenerate Earth’s Constitutional Beloved Community future?

Standard