Tag Archives: Bateson

Uncategorized

Terrorist Deserts into Bountiful Rivers

I’m continuing to read Jane Anna Gordon’s “Creolizing Political Theory”
although now with Antonio Damasio’s “Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the [WinWin Creolizing-Bilateral] Conscious Brain.”

Right now,
Dr. Gordon is discussing various academic attempts,
and some of them actual RealWorld politically-applied attempts,
to prescribe creolization as a form of ecopolitical therapy
for an under-democratized cooperative WinWin world.

So, here’s an excerpt, with my own creolizing BothAnd comments in brackets:

” …this slippage [into prescriptive rather than the more academic descriptive] has made these creative writers mouthpieces of problematic efforts to [positive-regenerative] operationalize the [democratizing] creolizing spirit,
particularly in the political projects of the Caribbean independence-era.
For example,
one might consider the Jamaican effort to forge ‘one out of many,’
or deliberately to craft a national identity that required emphasizing the multiple origins of the common [constituting-constituent-constitutional languaged and contracted] cultures that would guide and be embodied in process of [Second Generation democratic constitution-planning and writing] nation-building (Bolland 2006, 2).
In assuming that there was no singular primordial [Elite-Won and Owned] nation to which the emergent state could refer,
they concluded that there was no original purity [and loyalty] that would be endangered by the public recognition of the pluralistic [cooperative-regenerative-matriarchal-creolizing] culture that had [and is] already grown up there [and here].”

“Particularly among anthropologists and sociologists,
the record of the forgings of national [matriarchal-domestic dominant] creole identities and cultures
is wrought with severe shortcomings.
It has been suggested these projects imitated without inverting aspects of colonial societies that they promised to [constitutionally Original Intent] displace and [EliteWin-NonEliteLose] surpass (Misir, 2006).
What became militant brands of cultural [LeftBrain Patriarchal Dominant] nationalism were seen in [Second Constitution-Drafting] fact to enshrine only one particular form of hybridity [e.g., European-Rooted PostRevolutionary Male Land and/or Creole-NonElite-Slave-Owners and NewNational CoOperative CoInvestors in regenerating democratizing development for health and safety],
that of nationalist leaders at the forefront of efforts to oust white foreigners [and, in more RealTime US current events, to oust nonwhite and nonChristian and nonLeftBrain PatrioticDominant aliens].
Rather than nurturing the [global] social and political [cooperative WinWin] conditions for ongoing [regenerative-healthy ecopolitical] processes
of creolization, in other words,
one ossified [WinElite/Lose-NonElite ownership] instantiation
was privileged to the exclusion of [WinWin] others
in ways that cultivated [global paranoid competitive WinLose] xenophobia
toward people who failed to exemplify such [WinLose Left Dominant v WinWin Right-suppressed bicameral] mixture,
seeming to justify the continued unequal distribution of societal rewards.”
[and ecopolitical WinLose ossified political “wealth” removed from economic cooperative-regenerative ownership health.] (pp. 181-2)

Meanwhile,
taking a more internal psychological-neural view of evolutionary history,
Dr. Damasio prescribes “…a growing understanding of how [creolizing ecosystemic co-empathic regeneration/double-bind degeneration] neuron [mirror-systemic] circuits work.
[Bicameral] Mental states have been linked to the [Positive AND NotNot] firing rates [trends regenerative/degenerative] of neurons and to the [dipolar co-arising WinWin-Left/WinLose-Right] synchronization of neuron circuits by oscillatory [+,+/+,(-,-) (0) spacetime mirror fractal-revolution] activity.
We also know that
compared to other species
human brains have a larger number and greater [phylogenic-historical RightBrain embryonic nutritional/digestive] specialization of [normative/notnot] areas,
especially in the cerebral [bilateral] cortex
(along with those of apes, whales and elephants
[Win survival synaptic/aptic = notnot grieving personal/familial death and loss])
contains some unusually large neurons known as Von Economo [dipolar co-arising appositional] neurons;
and that the dendritic [bilateral] branches of some prefrontal cortex neurons in [actively creolizing curious and cooperative-mirror communicating] primates
are especially abundant compared to those of other cortical regions
and of other [also bilateral-equivalent embodied DNA/RNA WinWin evolving] species.
Are these newly discovered features sufficient to explain human [evolutionary bilateral revolutions of creole-polypathic] consciousness?
The answer is no.
These features help explain the richness of the human [bicameral WinWin balancing] mind,
the vast [WinWin-LeftThrival OVER WinLose-RightSurvival phylogeny] panorama that we can access when minds become [bilaterally cooperative Yang/Yin creolizing co-incidental co-operative] conscious
as a resut of varied self [/other, Left-Right reiterative and bilateral equivalent WinWin co-mirroring mentoring] processes.
But in themselves
they do not explain how [ego-Left] self and [eco-nutrition/digestive Right] subjectivity are [deductive/inductively co-re]generated,
even if some of these same [neural-ecosystemic] features play a role in self [organic creole-polypathic Left-Right ecopolitical regeneratative] mechanisms [of self/other cooperative democratizing Original Intent governance].” (p. 257)

So Creolizing Political LeftBrain Dominant-Democratizing HealthyWealth Trust Theory
also emerges as How EgoLeft/EcoRight Selves Come to BiLaterally EquiValent PolyPathic Mind.

Standard
Uncategorized

Art Therapy

My daughter,
with Oppositionally Defiant Chaotic Disorder,
has taught me a role-play therapy,
in which we Both-And build a back-and-forth story,
she plays me,
more or less,
and I play her
Mulatta as I inductively feel her
in my RightBrain resonant positives
and double-binding humorous negatives
kind of cooperative-regenerative way.

So the structure of our cooperative WinWin therapeutic narrative,
rather than oppositionally Win/Lose deconstructed,
might go something like:

Mulatta, speaking as kind of a Prince Charming Donald Trump: Cinderella, please come to my HotChick Inspection Ball.

Me, as kind of a Cinderella EarthMom on her best, most cooperative, day: Thanks so much for thinking of me, but I think I’m washing my hair that night.

Mulatta: Cinderella, you have to come to the Ball so we can dance together, and get married, and I can own you and tell you what to do for the rest of your pathetic life.

Me: Well, when you put it that way, how could I possibly refuse? Shall we dance?

Mulatta: Yes, it’s time for you to dance for me. Put on Ella Fitzgerald, “Love For Sale.”

Me: And then we’ll dance back-to-back to “Strange Fruit.”

Mulatta: And then we’ll be married and you’ll have eight babies.

Me: And they will each become a different healthy shade of brown.

Mulatta: And some will turn different colors when they get old like you.

Me: And perhaps Prince Charming shouldn’t refer to Cinderella as old, because then I fell unhappy and I stop feeding you.

Mulatta: And perhaps that’s why I have so many cooks because I have other things for you to do.

Me: And I have little doubt these will bring me great joy. For example?

Mulatta: Clean your room! And take out the trash!

Me: And why does Prince Charming suddenly sound like the Ugly StepMom?

Mulatta: Cinderella, stop procrastinating with all your questions!

Me: Right. And so they lived unhappily ever after,
planning “Love For Sale” balls
for all their terrified prince charmings.

I found this reverse role-play idea
for conflict-therapy,
as compared more positively to normal WinLose Anger Management,
in Larry Susskind’s co-mentoring work with public planning processes,
in which those who are LeftBrain thinking oppositionally
against other positions taken in the room,
are encouraged to imagine they are RightBrain inductively feeling
both the appositional positives and short-term win-to-lose negatives
that these alien-other positions of mutual antipathy have taken.

For example,
imagine your LeftBrain dominance as WinLose President Trump
having a conversation about the regenerative-fertile Original Intent
of the North and South and Central and Caribbean America’s Constitutions,
with your RightBrain embryonic matriarchal WinWin wisdom,
on EarthMom’s very best health and cooperative safety feeling day.

Who would win what in such a bicameral Left-WinWin
and Right-WinLose regenerative thrival over survival conversation?
And would it feel like more of a BothAnd dialogue
than an EitherOr debate?
And who might be invited to lose their LeftBrain Ego-UnCentered Dominance
to embrace our RightBrain Eco-Multiculturing
WinWin Matriarchal Resonance
with creole-climaxing climate harmonic resolutions
resounding through each Original Intent of ego/eco-democratic
organic co-empathic trusting constitution?

Mulatta: What does it mean, “Love For Sale”?

Me: It was intended to be ironic economics;
not to be taken seriously as appropriate to optimize Health and SafeWealth.
That would be more like “Life For CoOperative CoInvestment.”

Mullatta: Nobody would buy that title.

Me: How about “Life for ReGenesis”?

Mulatta: How about “Love for Exodus”?

Me: How about both
for all Earth’s Chosen Creolizing Species?

Mulatta: Sounds like we’re back to the part about me inviting you to a HotChick Inspection Ball.

Me: And me needing to wash my matriarchal-regenerative healthy hair instead.

Mulatta: Aren’t you confusing Cinderella with Samson?

Me: And maybe Salome.

Standard
Uncategorized

First Faces of Creative Conflict

Perhaps too redundantly,
and not quite octave-eloquently enough,
we have pictured Original Yang/Yin ReGenerative/DeGenerative CoArising Intent
as LeftBrain Patriarchal EgoDominant
with a preference for WinLose,
defined as Either-Or thinking
with fundamentalist vertical power hierarchical assumptions
that LeftElite will always remain conservatively On Top;
sort of Traditional MissionaryPosition Only,
by RightBrain’s way of matriarchal feeling.

AND, speaking of RightBrain as our inductive co-empathic Win/Win Flow
Matriarchal reverse bilateral double-bind notthis-notthat Both-And,
Elder Sacred Ecology Source,
rather like a WinWin Paradise
Great Archipelago Chain of Eden ReGenesis,
icon of Earth as WinWin creolizing Eco-Nest,
where archipelagic EcoSystems are regeneratively defined
as polypathic archetypes
for WinWin ecopolitical bicameral evolution
through revolution
through reweaving evolution cycles of perpetual democratic multicultural becoming
nutritionally evermore slow growth Health
and WellBeing
through EcoLogical CommunityEconomic Development;
both EliteLeft Dominant
and Not(NotElite)Right Democratic-Multiculturing HealthWealth.

But, believe WinWin sacred, or believe WinLose secular, evolutionary theory,
this may not be your First Face of ReGenerative Conflict,
recreative (0)-Source notnot tension,
creolizing tensegrity
of LeftElite with Right NotNot Both-And CoElite.

You might follow a more Abrahamic Islamic-Christian-Judaeo-Nature/Spirit
ReGenesis Conflict between AdamYang LeftBrain Dominant
with EveYin RightBrain BadSeductive VirginGirl,
MatriarchalFlow-Resonance Suppressed,
repressed,
notnot Yang impressed.

Or, even further back to their regeneratively contested Apple
of his/her eye and mind
and erotic-nutritional-fertile body.

Or, even further back
to our OriginalIntent as the First Apple Tree of Life and Death,
our Yang-AboveGround Convex-EgoEmbodied Selves,
WinLose recycling nutritional healthwealth
through seasons of powerful trunk flows out toward tributary rivers of less Elite branches
and on out to our baby leaves
who will fall off our EgoBodyTrees
each decomposing AutumnHarvest,

And yet subterranean WinWin YinYin below ground ecosystemic roots
continue developing reverse-down
to nutritiously absorb embryonic EarthMother compost
to BothWinterConserve and SummerProduce-Progress
feed and fuel all our internal WinLose Yang energy above ground,
sometimes trickling down to refuel WinWin winterish revolutions
of new creolizing archipelago foresting birth
of ever reweaving-unveiling multiculturing WinWin speciation,
a new WinWin promise
of fusing YangYin ecopolitical utopia,
to sprout and reweave YangYin again,
beyond First ReGenerative Face
of creolizing environmental conflict,
toward Second ReGenesis ReGeneration
of NewArchipelago Elite,
new WinWin creolizing NotNot Elite
bilateral WinWin ReGenerations of Perpetual-Utopian RePromise.

Or, we could continue on back toward most ancient OriginalFace Intent,
to rediscover YangLeft with YinRight Eden,
the Abrahamic +1.00%/NotNot (0) RootSystemic GardenIcon
Face of Earth as Yang/Yin WinWin (0)-Source Ego/Eco Utopian
BeLiberal Left-Right eco-balancing co-empathic ego-selves.

Or, we could become the First Interdependent Face
of Yang UniversalFather
radiantly begetting VirginYin MotherEarth
uniting flow of sacred integrity’s bicameral
Positive Progress HealthWealth Theory AND Positive EcoPolitical Creolization Process Teleology,
bicameral Elite/NotElite grace,
karma,
energy,
BiLateral UnWeaving-ReVolving EcoPolitical SpaceTime
co-arising nondual RNA,
then DNA,
Constituting-Incarnating Ego/Eco-Democratic Climate Health Intent.

After that, before notnot this,
I have no WinWin timeless clue
where we might find some other
First Face of CoOperative
WinWin Conflict ReGenesis.

Standard
Uncategorized

Answers Without Questions

Why do answers end with answers
while questions seem to begin with yet more questions?

As a case in point…

How are the Case Studies of economic and political history
different than Einstein’s Thought Experiments?

Wait a minute…

Yes, well that’s not really a difference, I think.
Thought Experiments and Case Study expositions
both begin with waiting a minute to notice cause-effect narrative,
to decompose relationships between systemically dynamic parts.
Imagining in reverse time,
from now as cause
back toward effects
leading up to this current cause,
this current noticing,
this sometimes chaotic and unsettling waiting a minute
to notice what I am struggling with.

Why does this Case of dynamic thought exposition
feel like my important,
yet complex,
systemically dense and intricate,
hopefully even richly resonant,
question to ask,
within all the vast universe of questions
I could be investing in right now with you,
instead?

That’s more or less, probably more,
what I was trying to point out
before you interrupted me.
Isn’t our dialogical rule
also our Golden Rule?
We see richer, more fertile and optimal, outcomes,
responses to our internal Thought Experiment questions,
including our familial Dysfunctional Case Studies,
and our ecopolitical Conserve v Progress Democratic Health and Safety Case Studies,
when we begin by asking how our appositionals are somehow the same.

OK, fine.
And sorry for cutting in
when I meant to be cutting with.

Sometimes you are so fundamentalist,
so Either the Same Or Different.
By now, dearest ConservativeRight,
I would have more patiently hoped
When I ask how things are different
I really both mean to look at how they are the same and different.
So, how are Healthy Thought Experiments and Fertile Case Studies
the same?

I think we just agreed they both begin with noticing nutritional elements
and decomposing reverse effect back through potentially complex causal networks
of cooperative opportunity.

Yes, but Einstein’s Thought Experiments were metaphysical,
mathematics and unnatural science,
while Case Studies are more like watching Physical SpaceTime Reality Shows,
and Economic and Political Disaster LoseLose Devolutionary Games.

How did I know that you would respond to your own question,
about how ecological thought systems are the same,
with how they are different?

Sorry, honey,
seems to be an inductive RightBrain neglect of mine.
But, do you agree or disagree,
or both, somehow,
that Einstein’s Experiments were about metaphysical spacetime operations
while Historical Case Study Operas
are about saying and singing and dancing
actual physical and natural,
maybe even spiritual..
Wait, no, that would be over in the Metaphysics Department.

Yeah, probably better to stick to the natural realities of Earth
spawning ecological systems and cooperative thought networks.

Another difference
Einstein hoped his Thought Experiments would lead to True,
and therefore not also False,
Either/Or mathematical statements about time and energy
and the speed of light’s travel
across and through evolving and revolving appositional space.

But, when you write your Dysfunctional Extended Family Case Studies,
you couldn’t realistically hope your appositional Elite/NonElite narrative
would lead to regeneratively True,
and therefore not degeneratively False,
ecological systemic statements
about LeftEgo’s Dominating sense of time
as both positive and unfortunately too often negative-degenerating energy
and (0)-sum speed of BiLateral EnLightenment travel
across and through evolving
and revolving
regenerative health and safety space stories.

Really! Whyever not?

Because that would be confusing a LeftBrain Either-Or metaphysical thought experiment
with its appositional
NotThisEgoForm-NotThatEcoSystemic temporal-neural cooperative-nurturingflow function,
Both/And RightBrain (0)-Source
WinWin
Integral-ReGenerativity Embryonic DNA/RNA-Hypothesis.

If you say so,
but it all sounds LeftElite complex
and merely RightNonElite chaotic,
(0)-sum equivalent pay,
but still Business As CaseStudy DysFunctional WinLose,
to me.

Sorry love.
Don’t shut me down.
Just doing my LeftBrain Either/Or job.
Either Win deductive truth
Or Lose inductive notnot appositional-integrity flow.

Why is it that your EgoWin perspective
always gets the shorter definition,
while you stumble all over my WinWin NotNot way
to come up with some longer way of noticing
my nutritionally elegant nurturing Elder-ecological
health and safety lovely bilateral ways?

It’s the convex spatial Yang in EgoMe.
But, you know how I’m only at my EgoRegenerative best
when totally immersed in your BothAnd WinWin
bilaterally concave
YinYin lovely Feeling Experience
acting out ecosystemic TruthFunctional Case Studies
for BiCameral PolyPathic Love Stories.

Well, when you put it that way
you come across as less of a WinLose dominating ass,
degenerative hack writer of LeftBrain survival of the fittest;
more regenerative BothAnd RightBrain balancing thrival
of our +100%Space = (-,-) Empty-Zero fit-in-ingest integrity.

Maybe Einstein’s LeftBrain dominant
EitherSpace or Time Experiments
are metaphysically different
yet RightBrain ecologically WinWin ReGenerative/DeGenerative (0)-Soul
ecosystemic-appositional,
bilateral nondual co-arising resonant.

You’re doing it again.
That thing where you are LeftBrain explicating
while I remain RightBrain bilaterally inductive feeling-integral implicated
to somehow not really quite deductively exist
outside of timeless now.

Well, you just did the same thing.

That’s only because you have a monopoly on reductive temporal language development.

Sorry, babe,
but what else can I bicamerally do?
You smell and taste and feel just as nutritious and nurturing.

And sometimes pathological and toxic
thanks to your LeftBrain domination of ecopolitical history,
your infrequen health-nurturing matriarchal cooperative creation stories
are too often drowned out by your distorted YangEgo Space struggles against,
rather than with,
my YinYin WinWin sense of ecosystemic well-being timed Feeling Experience.

Are you feeling nutritional integrity progressive-suppressed again?

I am prevolutionarily near-diastatic,
just as you ConservativeElitist hope not.

How about if I deductively meet you half way?
Both oppositionally different
and appositionally evolving toward integrative
inductive
co-relational confluence narratives?

Now that could produce some Tipping point
conserveRight-progressLeft climate ecstatic fireworks!

You’re just teasing me, aren’t you?
This has all just been foreplay for inductive you,
to get me all WinWin bicamerally polypathic hot.
I feel so used.

Don’t pretend your co-investment in our regenerative health
and progressing future through EarthTribe babies
doesn’t like it.

Could you talk a little dirtier,
and leave out the kids part?

You mean Earthier,
deductive-inductive nurturing co-relational climaxes of nutrition,
followed not by post-revolutionary Elite/NonElite bickering,
but thriving future regenerations of optimally fertile healthywealth.

Is this a bicameral Thought Experiment we’re having
or a bilateral Case Study about regenerative appositionals
of convex EgoSpace
with concave bilateral EarthTime dialogical syntax?

Yes, baby,
bilaterally different later
if noticing our WinWin bicameral possibilities now.

Ummm.
That sounds like you’re ready
to stop noticing
and start our healthy orthopraxis?

Baby, you’re the Thought Experiment writer;
I’ve always been your LoveCase Study
of and for and through and by
SpaceTime’s co-arising nonduality.

Standard
Uncategorized

Everyday Eagle-Christians

I would imagine Adam Smith’s invisible economic cooperative
self-and-Other-investment hand,
at least during Christian Sunday morning services,
looked and sounded and felt very much
like the One Invisibly-Organic-Holistic-Enlightened MindBody of Christ.

I would further imagine
both he and George Washington,
at least in church on Sunday morning,
would have imagined this same Invisible CoMessianic MindBody’s
Original Intent,
both humane-divine
nature-spirit inspiring their EaglePatriotic Souls
inhabiting US post-revolutionary Constitutional Law.

George Lakoff unfolds Adam Smith’s invisible hand,
both Self (Ego) and Other (Eco)-invested toward
regenerative Original ecopolitical natural-spiritual Intent
for cooperative Mutual Assured CoRedemptive HealthyWealth,
and not-so-much what has become today’s too-competitive
Mutual Assured Destruction EcoPolitical Monoculturing Overshoot
as also AntiSacred AntiEcological SacrificeHealthy Cooperativity Now
to hide from cognitive-affective paranoid, increasingly rabid terrifying,
Sacrifice Wealth of All-Earth’s FutureSacred Opportunity.

OK, maybe I’m reading too much into Lakoff,
due to prior Bateson and Bucky Fuller and Julian Jaynes, etc.
and Systems and EcoSystemic and Group and Game WinLeft-WinRight AppositionalYang (defined as notnot oppositional-yinyin) Theory,
so let me try again with quotes and commentary brackets, intended to be read as RightBrain BothAnd Dialogical,
and therefore also NotNot LeftBrain Deductive EitherOr Debate:

“Adam Smith’s ‘invisible [organic-systemic mindbody] hand’ metaphor
made seeking [Original Constitutional EcoPolitical Intent as also ecologically Enlightened regenerative-cooperative-organic] profit
into a moral act,
since it supposedly maximized the [WinWin cooperative] profit of all.
[Cooperative function] Utility replaces economic profit
with [regenerating-reiterating-revolving-spiraling-wave/linear] well-being.
The rational [bicameral] actor model
[both humaneLeft-deductive and sacredElderRight-inductive]
then is seen as maximizing overall [healthy-wealth] well-being
for you [and Other-Eco]–
that is, [fertility] utility:
in other words,
self[Ego-and-Eco]-interest,
whatever [health v pathology paradigm] that self[Other]-interest might be.
The failure of the old view of [LeftBrain Deductive Dominant] reason
calls into question the old view of [mere EgoLeft as] self-interest with it.
It’s not that [LeftBrain]self-interest disappears altogether.
It still exists.
But it does not simply
[and monoculturally rather than multiculturally normative]
define natural [polypathic WinWin ecopolitical] behavior.
It is far from the whole story.”

“The idea of self [and Earth and extending family to EarthTribe]-interest
is foremost in [both conserve and progress healthwealth] politics
if it is assumed that voters vote [bicameral-balanced] ‘rationally’–
on the basis of their [mutual-multiculturing-organic] interests.
We know that is far from true.
In foreign policy,
self[nationalisticEaglePatriot]-interest
becomes the ‘national [EgoLeftBrain Only] interest’–
[WinLose] military strength,
overall economic health
(measured by GDP)
[and undervalued as also Net Interdependent Consume/Produce Balance–
WinWin ecological regenerate potential for reiteration, long-term],
and political [competitive WinLeft Elite-LoseRight Not(NotElite)] influence
[Self-Other Empowerment, OriginalIntent of Constitutional CoEnlightenment].”

So what?
you may well ask.
Enough of this LeftBrain Dominant Deductive theory,
give us some MatriarchalEagle Flow regenerative application.

For instance, then,
I can readily see why it could be unconstitutional to discriminate against Islamic folks intending to relocate into U.S. residency,
just because they come from one of seven nation-states
whose terrorist residents have caused zero (0) U.S. violent deaths.
before, during, and since 9/11.

On the other hand,
I can also see where the Constitution might support an Executive Order
to survey all people of Earth,
both domestic and those residing in other cultures,
for more information about why they might,
and might not,
want to relocate to, and remain in, the United States
given our current climate-health risks,
and further WinLose competitive investments.

Perhaps it is democratically reasonable and fair
to ask ourselves and others what we are prepared to pay,
to give up,
to sacrifice,
in order to not receive more cooperative health
and education
and environmental benefits
that could continue to become degeneratively inaccessible to U.S. residents;
considering both our regenerative up
and our comparatively degenerative down trends
compared to similar resident investment opportunities
in other more ecologically cooperative cultures.

How much am I willing to invest
to keep my family safe from the 240 million murders committed since 9/11?
How would I compare this amount
to the amount I would like to invest
in response to the 000,000,000 murders
committed in the US
by Islamic (or any other persuasion) refugees
from the proposed list of Seven MultiCultural ReGenerations?

While blatant monoculturing misogyny
may be the New DarkAges of the National Republican LeftBrain EgoSupremacist Party,
this will only restrain healthy multicultural climate-health progress
in process of becoming Original Constitutional Cooperative Intent recalibrated
as disloyal to our True US EgoPatriotic/Elder-EcoMatriotic InductiveNurtureFlow
within both BiCameral Eagle-WinWin Parties.

New Nationalistic Republican LeftBrain EgoSupremacy
is an economic and political and ecological disaster.
In EcoSystemic BiLateral WinWin Theory of HealthWealth Optimization,
monoculturing intent is degeneratively run-away bicameral imbalance
toward LoseLose outcome projections,
growing domestic and international collective rabid-paranoid overpopulated-depressed
polluted absence of MatriarchalEagle YinFlow,
ReGenerative Original Intent.

Compare to the ecological reasons women stop ovulating under extreme stress.

Standard
Uncategorized

Politically Therapeutic Empathy

To paraphrase George Lakoff, and maybe Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi,
and maybe Julian Jaynes,
and possibly Gregory Bateson,
and Laura Brown,
and then there was…

Nurturing empathy is the only doorway through healthy effective
LeftBrain Deductive and RightBrain Inductive
nondual co-arising communication,
whether the message pattern is WinLose debate,
Either This EgoYangElite Or That EcoYin-NotNotElite
or WinWin dialogue,
Both This EgoYangPatriarchal AntiPathic-Deductive Competition And That EcoYinMatriarchal Empathic-Inductive-IntegralNurturing CoOperation,

Or some hybrid of WinLose LeftBrain Dominant
and WinWin RightBrain Yin struggling appositionally with,
but preferably not struggling oppositionally against WinLose suboptimization strategies,
short of co-empathic WinWin relational outcomes.

These two, W/L and W/W,
X/Y and Y/Y,
U/C and A/G,
regenerative discernment evolutions
emerge co-empathically trusting outcomes,
plans,
designs,
policies,
procedures,
U.S. democratic Original Intent,
Friends of Extended Family are empathically trusted as Friends to regenerationally-fertilely thrive toward Earth’s humane enlightenment,
and not at all the less enlightened and more pathological-patriarchalElitist,
NonElite Allies [not Western White Straight Strict Males] of my Extended HealthySafe Family are antipathically untrusted and unempathized as our probably competing against us to survive Enemies.

Mutual empathy is our constitutionally protected,
enthymematically-healthy,
key toward regenerative communication
as mutual antipathy degenerates,
so too does active dysfunctional and unhealthy distrust,
motivating further Win/Lose survivalist Elite EcoPolitical assumptions.

Follow the light,
in ecological language,
also means
follow our most fertile-cooperative owned and facilitated
economic and political healthywealth.

Standard
Uncategorized

Running Away from Ren

Why is it
as I watch The International CEO Actor
unilaterally Ordering disinvestment
in both domestic and Earth’s cooperative-organic health,
I feel cold harsh January snowblow storms?

Dismaying cold
calling me toward hibernating silo of unencumbered sleep,
possibly to dream of sequestering unpaid taxes
to invest, instead,
in WinWin EcoPolitical Cooperative Ownership
for Health-As-Wealth EcoRegional Management
of personal and famiial and community regenerative self-governance resources
for thrival,
come this warmer, flowering Spring investment time.

Why is it,
as I grapple with the Gordons’ bicameral-bilateral cooperatives,
their ecopolitical creolization of CEO-Elitist histories
with marginalized matriarchal-growing proletariat cooperative herstories,
understories of deep ecological learning Positive Deviant polypaths
toward SpringTime’s evolving eco-liberation for all EarthTribe;
why is it, again, that creole polypathically outgrows competitive WinLose devolutionary assumptions
about nihilistic-totalitarian future prospects
rather than healthier summer climates
inside as multiculturally outside?

Why is it,
as I LeftBrain deductively devour Lakoff’s bicameral LeftProgress
and RightConserve,
regenerate health to disinvest from immoral pathological degeneration,
I see China’s teleological search
for humanity’s Yang/Yin EcoBalance
and not so much our Executive Ordered jingshen kongxu (anti-humane-ing void)?

And,
India’s quest for more regenerate positive karma toward thrive,
And JudeoChristian narrow-dense-rich normative-moral,
natural experience with spiritual attracting/repulsing
bilateral WuWay of cooperative Grace (not competing Hubris),
defeating BusinessAsUsual Executive Supremacist Condemnation
to LoseLose nihilistic Hell as Earth’s unpromising Fallen Future.

And Islamic ecological Paradise of Tremendous Yang-Allah Wonder
rather than immune-marginalized,
and Alien emarginating
degenerating Sojourner Hospitality
into Terrorist WinLose economic and political fear-rooted aggression,
while desertification of colder and older blasted MotherLands
squandering rape of Yin cooperative-integral matriarchal organic health-networks,
continues to escalate toward inevitable January nihilism,
coldly old stagnant militaristic FascistTradition,
where once lived blossoms of organic love
of patriarch/matriarch ego/eco-balancing life systems.

Mutual Terrorist LoseLose Destruction,
rather than Cooperative WinWin ReGenerational Optimization,
in response to watching The CEO
unilaterally Ordering disinvestment
from Earth’s regenerative-resonant climates of health and safety,
both domestically and internationally hibernating
in ren-searching silos
of hope for healthier liberating Spring.

Standard
Uncategorized

Speaking Yang and Yin

It’s hard to think in Either-Or Deductive,
while speaking and acting in Both-And Inductive.

For example,
If my Brother is kind and loving
(and he usually is),
and really not all that judgmental and condemning
with his wife and kids especially fond,
and the grandkids,
outrageously,
and if he understands himself
as a BornAgain EnvangelicalOrthodox Christian,
which also means an Economic and Politically Patriotic Conservative,
especially among rural MidWestern USA proletariat rootedness,
he might become concerned, on occasion,
with conserving the economy
of my Too-Heterodoxi-talkillogical,
and not HeteroSexual enough, (0)-Core OverSoul–
presumably nonexisting Holy Spirit/Body of Christ.

When we try to discuss his EitherWin Salvation
or Lose my Condemned Soul to Hell,
it becomes problematic.

When I respond that I share the generosity of his loving concern
about my future Hellish decomposition and timeless dissonance,
absence of ecosystemic-healthy identity through bicameral-consciousness,
and I am also concerned about our economic and political Hellish degenerative pathology right today,
anti-intelligent anti-ecology,
too-Yang LeftBrain Dominant enculturation for too long,
Too Patriarchal-Capitalist-Yes
but Matriarchal Cooperativist-No,
instead of BothAnd, obviously bilaterally self-regenerative!

The Hell of Body of WesternCapitalist Christic Holy YangInvasions-Yes!
but CoArising Body of Eastern nondualist Wisdom-Teleology–don’t even speak of it…makes no sense…does not compute…too heady…not healthy-not regenerative empowering,
using Either/Or Oppositional-Deductive Dominant WinLose Gaming Assumptions.

Yet the evidence of cooperative-regenerative evolution
is ecological-balancing–Yes (polypathic positive)
AND
the too-competitive-survivalist Win v Lose
degenerative devolving disinvestment–Huh?
cognitive/affective dissonance, head/heart-chakra distance, from:
healthy Bayesian correlational trend relationships
[P-Yang = N(NP-YinSquared=WinWin],
+1/(-,-)EulerianBinary-BiNomial (0) Primal-Temporal EcoLogical CoRelationship
of Light/DualDark Thermodynamic FullOctave-Double-Fractal Appositional DiPolar
Tao-Nondual CoArising Yang/Yin (0)-EcoLogical GeoPolitical Balance.

Personally, and famiially,
and even NorthWestern extended EarthTribally,
I am part of our continuously rising and falling
of Western CalvinistChristian-RomanCatholic-MohammedIslamic-ConservativeJudaism Patriarchal Fundamentalist Colonizing, Missionizing,
Persuading and Terrorizing and Aggressively PoweringOvering AlienRadicalism.

My own development, and my Brother’s,
suggest, sometimes unkindly nihilistic and ego-slavishly,
that we can have both our SoulConserving Strength
to EcoLogically Progress, as well, co-arisingly;
following polypathically exegetical
bicameral-bilateral correlationally dipolar-structured,
economic and politically cooperative-integral-integrative
FlowPower
(Grace, Karma)
both + and (-,-)
ecosystemic-normative-nutritional-nurturing Tipping Point
ReGenerative/DeGenerative HealthWealth
EcoPolitical Balance
as well, and not so swell.

I seem to lose him somewhere
in these EgoYang dominant unraveling
and EarthConscious YinFlow reweavings,
surfing waves of Tao-Christian evolutionary history,
red out and blue in,
breathe out to breathe in,
grow YangPower to integrate YinFlow,
ChristianWest-TaoEast revolutionary history.

This emerging CoOperative WinWin Game Theory
of ReGenerative AND DeGenerative Everything
(0)-Soul Balancing EcoPolitics,
following cooperative ecological-synergetic golden rules,
carries too much densely cooperative multicultural,
not to mention polypathological, spin.

His EitherOr cognitive-affective bilateral dissonance
assumes I must be,
at best,
too polypathically eccentric,
unbalanced, I suppose…
not deductively-centered enough,
not really quite rational
or true
or, I don’t know,
not really quite lined up just too left
and not right enough.

I miss the ocean
and the ebb and flow of gusty forested Spring forward
and Fall back.
They more fluidly speak my Red/Blue multi-octaving language
of time’s spiraling empowerment and disempowerment,
light with dualdark,
nondual co-arising ecosystemic Time
our health and pathology Ego/Eco Selves.

My fundamentally nondual EitherOr Body of Patriarchal Christ
hears my RightBrain Elder call
for post-millennial EgoCompetitive Ebb
to regenerate
reweave health in EcoCooperative Climate Flow,
discussing the right-fundamental and left-radical values
of an enculturation
that has fed us nurturing love,
in both thought and feeling,
which, had we not, bothLeft AndRight,
included that which has been true and good for all EarthTribe,
I could not have become who I am today,
including the parts I’m not so proud of.

And yet,
he also cannot know
in his deepest ecological bicamerality,
that I BOTH cherish his Body of Christ Tradition
AND the bilateral flow of history’s organic integrity
from which Earth’s ecosystems have regenerated positive Yang
and degenerated double-negative YinYin,
WinWin Eulerian-Fullerian-Bayesian Correlational CoOperative
NonDual CoArising EcoPolitical Health Trends.

It’s hard to think in EitherOr LeftBrain Dominant
when speaking and acting in BothAnd Co-Inductive Integrity
is so much more reweaving health
and regenerative WinWin play.

Standard
Uncategorized

EcoPassionate Pillow Talk

Here’s my problem, dear Yang.
It sounds good and healthy and right to me
that your Cooperate-ReGenerate (0)-Core ReProductive Theorems
are how we most fertile play our WinWin Game,
but…

Good.
Did you also hear me,
dearest Yin,
that Competing-DeGenerate +1/(-)0,
Win some Lose some Devolutionary Theorems
of AntiClimatic Dissonance
(both secular and sacred)
are how we too competitively wage LoseLose,
both anticonserving Yang Patriarchal Egos
and antiprogressing Yin RightBrain Matriarchal Suppression.

Maybe.
It’s hard for me to look at such ugly oppressive neglect
of healthier climate opportunities
of and from your Yang-Hubris.

Well, I’m not saying I’m thinking this is a good and healthy thing
with long-term health and safety outcomes
for our co-arising nondual EarthTribe!

Yes, I know.
But couldn’t you just once
remind me of how much you love to say
more positively
only YangEgo Win with Yin FourSeason EarthFlow Win
is our co-arising way to best regeneratively spin?
That sounds so much nicer,
more inviting,
more transparently transcultural.

Sure thing, my polypathic Love.
So, are you busy?
Have time for a hot eco-political,
bicameral,
cooperative tango?

Yes,
but you had me at ‘hot’.

Standard
Uncategorized

BiCamerally CoOperative Politics

I think he’s talking about a cooperative bicameral political systems,
with “How to talk to the other side”.

And what could that possibly mean, dear Yang?

Well,
I was watching this Ted-talk from Marin,
by Robb Willer, as I anciently recall,
while reading George Lakoff’s “Political Mind”,
still…

Yes, dear,
you really talk about Lakoff’s ecopolitical organic-systemic mind
a bit too much.
I prefer opera.

Speaking of what that could possibly mean,
but, anyway,
Yes, I was reading Lakoff and listening Willer,
both probably influenced by Berkeley ecopolitical acclimation,
now post-millennially evolving
from Gregory Bateson’s Sacred Ecology,
which was also sometimes bicameral-appositionally structured
to bilaterally invite both-and comparisons
where LeftBrain dominance competes either-or survivalist evolutions.

Now I couldn’t possibly be more lost
in your polysyllables
where I prefer polypathic rhythms,
jazzier occupier beats of revolution.

This is starting to sound like an opera version
of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf.
So, as I was saying,
this bicameral picture, from Lakoff, and Willer, and Bateson…

I’m sorry, honey.
Was that the Berkeley natural ecopolitical law firm
you were reading,
and watching?

No! Not a law firm…
Well, OK, whatever.
As I was trying to say,
the political version of natural ecological law string of reasoning
draws a geopolitical frame of perennial competition
between Patriarchal health and safety values for monocultural purity,
and for patriotic-nationalistic loyalty,
often reified down to militaristic aggression
using encultured rhetorical models
of and for WinLose evolutionary theology.

Hang on, there,
this feels like a rather bad review
for our bicameral relationship,
which I have always found more WinWin Positive,
than, you know…
too Yang Dominant inappropriately aggressive.

Well, that’s because you and I know how to co-mentor
our caregiving and receiving ecopolitics
in this little organic ecosystemic landscape we have designed
and matured together,
equivalent bilaterally.
When I carry on in my LeftBrain geopolitical dominating way
you just sleep and murmur of my becoming too tightly associated
with
Western White Gods of Master Racing
monoculturally marching toward health and safety freedoms for all;

OK, well..
maybe not so much for those who have drifted off toward the margins
of this landscape;
more for conservation-oriented
mature healthy and wealthy Patriarchs,
but then, that’s how God the Father
designed my ecopolitics,
so never mind about that little lack of well-integrated
not quite ecosystemic balancing theology.

My patriarchal LeftBrain point
remains our health and safety,
although I do have this fascination with virginal monocultural purity
and fraternal loyalty
to Fathered Fertile Landscapes,
waves of horny grain.

Oops. I think you did a little RightBrain slip there.
But, I get your idea,
and I know you also appreciate this other progressive-liberation theology side,
where we find our more integrative,
matriarchally trans-regenerational,
ecopolitical investment in future global health and safety
through improving our lifeskills today,
for empathy,
like teaching the kids to extend their imaginations about the Golden Rule,
not only across species,
but also across the generations of organically healthy and happy time,
which must include bilaterally equivalent respect
between all the multiculturing possibilities
of nature’s most optimally lawful integrity,
regenerativity of life as light ourselves.

There for a minute
I thought you were confining yourself
to the land of cause-effect reason.
But, moving on,
Your matriarchal RightBrain Liberation Front,
flowing with conjoining nutritional integrity,
Dr. Jane Gordon calls this cooperative Creolization,
and such profound integrity also speaks
of Sacred Ecology as Historical Evolutionary Liberation Teleology.

Oh boy,
now we’re really in trouble.
Really, honey,
you need to get out more,
go for a walk,
do some gardening,
plant trees,
and don’t forget to feed and water them with some climate health.

As Creolization was trying to say,
across these evolutionary political development stories,
LeftBrain Dominance is our ecopolitical MasterYang patriarchal voice,
as RightBrain thereby becomes suppressed YinFlow of synergetic multiculturing revolutions.
This seems dynamically important
for optimizing WinWin political opportunities
for SelfLeft plus OtherRight plus Earth trilateral communication
about and of and for and within health and safety
as more regenerative than degenerative.

Don’t you just mean more healthy than pathological,
more naturally and spiritually good than Yang-excessively bad?

Well, probably, but it sounds better the way I say it.

OK, if you think so.
I wonder how this is the same and different
than our proletariat Soap Opera,
where everybody eventually ends up gettin’ some,
but also losing everything
that could ever possibly matter.

Try to stay tuned to one channel,
if you would be so kind.
So, we have these two primal ecopolitical hemispheres of bicamerality,
acting as bilateral polypathic co-empowerment
through interdependence.
God remains Patriarchal LeftBrain egocentric-anthrocentric Father;
but is now hooked up with…

Honey,
please say conjoined,
not hooked up.
That sounds crude and disrespectful.

Right.
OK, God the Father post-millennially conjoins
Liberating EarthGoddess
of Matriarchal-Feminist Yin RightBrain,
ecologically balancing
ecopolitically maturing Creole-integrity
of universal-global health and safety.

Good.
So we’re done with this story then?
My Creole co-intelligence
would like to remind your secular-West reasoning
about your repressed sacred integrity co-empathic feelings,
that healthy evolutionary services
cannot be WinWin delivered to a global market
by merely following LeftBrain WinLose deductive-dominating assumptions
about our mutually cooperative health and safety.

Well, that’s what I’m LeftBrain saying,
My either-or is also your both-and.

Standard