Uncategorized

Biconic Language

Passion speaks as the child of reductive suffering.
Peace instinctively feels childlike kindness.
Contented,
content-full,
mindful therapeutic child of time’s bipolar identity contention.

Passion, without kindness,
necessary for comprehensively contented consciousness,
but not quite yin enough.

Peace, without suffering fore-giveness for anger and fear,
redeeming these negative investments,
necessary for full-love mindfulness
yet not quite yang enough.

Co-passionate peace,
dipolar bicamerally harmonizing
Earth’s full-octaves
of informating polycultural function,
eternally regenerates
Time’s spatial econtented
informational
in-teleo-dance,
in-tell-advance,
deductively intuitional intelligence
as universal con-science,
co-science,
re-scienced,
re-deductively synchronic,
re-connected, re-volutioned,
re-ligioned,
re-logosed,
E-logos,
Polynomial Eco-Peace (+)
OVER
Co-Passioning (-,-) Binomially Bicameral Ego-Purgation.

We each incarnate to redeem our Ego investment,
born of Earth’s DNA regenerating coins of language
double-negative binding parental Ids
create a SuperEconomic stickly bliss.

Karma
(evolution, incarnation, grace, research and design, deductive logic, stimulus and response, before and after, cause-effect)
grows a rich compost,
our reasoning souls
and seasoning soils
get out of time what ego-economic intent
and eco’s-logically instinctive RNA-rooted praxis
cooperatively regenerate into it.

Soil enrichment
and soul regeneration
are two landscapes
of one ecotherapeutically permacultural practice.
Browns are decomposing peaceful yins.
Greens are regenerate yang copassions.
Stir with just right contention every night,
to emerge into your new day
of comprehensively organic intelligence.

Binomiality is 0-dimensional
predicated,
predicted, precessive mutually gravitational,
natural magnetic systemic,
implicate,
implied,
instinctive,
camouflaged,
tipping point boundary,
concave/convexly enthymematic,
within each monomial,
within all holonic polynomials,
whether convex(+) or concave(-) in-formating.

Nomials,
memes,
form with function,
yang with yin,
speak an interdependent holonic language of bi-fractal octaves,
whether light or dark,
or both,
as do RNA,
and DNA,
protons with electrons,
are bicameral informating processors,
with ego-Left proton deductive inhalation
balancing
eco-Right magnetic instinctive DNA/RNA Elder Memory expiration.

Breathe in contenting peace
by breathing out contentious co-passion.
Breathe in compassion
by breathing out peaceful co-prehension.

Breathe in permacultural co-operating economic praxis
to breathe out polycultural ecological consciousness.

Standard
Uncategorized

CoRedeemer Human Economics

Naturally regenerative,
living,
natural systems,
nature,
optimize global ecological opportunities
as co-redemptive economies
of loving solidarity relationships
expressing mutual not-negative subsidiarity,
within a web of interdependent Win-Win default networks.

If we are born DNA investments of past generations
redeeming economic risks
weighed as ecological opportunity
for co-passioning peace with active love for all species,
all nature,
all Earth,
all Universal Intelligence,
then we are an interdependent species of co-redeeming economists
thinking and acting and relating and feeling
sensing and feeling and smelling and tasting
touching and respecting and appreciating ecologically balanced reasons,
seasons of time and pattern and rhythm,
where fasting advents both precede and follow
cornucopic polycultural seasons for all cells and organisms.

We find and sustain co-therapeutic relationship balance
half way between Yang-ego’s deductive-reductive immunity boundaries
and Yin-eco’s intuitive receptive co-operativity,
co-redemptivity,
correlation-ability,
mutual empathic gratitude
trans-actional polypathic multisystemic relationships.

If co-redeemers are messiahs
then we are also mutual messiahs
as we intend cooperative Win-Win eco-normative and eco-logical outcomes.

Perhaps mutual messiahs find it simpler to wrestle with,
rather than against death’s pain and suffering,
to figure out what to divest of
by reconnecting within each moment’s present opportunity
to what and whom and when and where and why we invest integratively
with each “Other”s health and well-being,
co-redemptive economically rational, yet passionate, logic,
as well as Right-brain’s intuitive temperate sense of balance,
proportion,
enthymematic syntax of permaculturing RNA rhythm.

Ego’s Logos as co-determinate partner
with Eco’s Right-brain Mythos
co-redemptive design with re-creating developmental revolutions.

Standard
Uncategorized

Tao of Universal Balance

“At the deepest level of reality the only force is gravity.”

Bill Laporte-Bryan (www.billlaportebryan.com, “A Theory of Everything”)

In the beginning was bilateral, binomial, mutually prime relational, gravity.

Gravity is convexly expressed as positively radiant 3-spatial dimension curvilinear, ionic-balance-seeking energy.

Gravity is concavely impressed as binomially negative ergodic-balance-remembering (0)-dimensional syntropy. Buckminster Fuller defines syntropy as “Energy associative [rather than radiantly disassociative] as matter precession [emergent, or predicated, predicted, potential, and/or Bohm’s Implicate Order], gravity, magnetic, interference knotting.” (p. 694, 1975, Synergetics)

A prime gravitational epicenter is compatible with Euler’s view that universe’s geometric form follows prime relational “crossover” function. Bucky adds positive-space to double-knotted-time to Eulerian metric prime relational function. It is this intersection of cosmology and the abstractions of metric Group Theory that I anticipated Max Tegmark might mention in his work on universe as math-rooted (2014).

From this bi-dimensional prime perspective, as convex v. concave expression of universally coserved energy, convex explicit-positive radiant expression takes on a permacultural face of physical universe’s emergence through time; our cosmic breathing outward.

A reverse-temporal view of (0)-sum gravitational emergence may lead us back to an elder point of dense Origin as the gravitational Black Hole breathing in of Time’s de-spaciating, re-integrative energy.

This perspective on the evolving nature of an emergent spacetime universe seems compatible with Buckminster Fuller’s view that Physical Universe = Gravity * Radiant-Energy(squared), which Bucky understood as his transposition of Einstein’s E=M * c(squared).

This bilateral view of convex/radiant and concave/gravitational conservation of ionic-positive and ergodic-doublenegative energy is also ecologically equivalent to Taoism’s prime dynamic relatioinship of Yang v. Yin functions. Yang has the classic teleologist’s positive-emergent-power perspective, while Yin enjoys a more mystically esoteric, “camouflage,” double-negative, not this-not that, gravitational (0)-sum ergodic conservancy, rooted in reverse-temporal (permacultural) memory.

Just as gravity is intrinsically binomial with physical universe, so too radiantly positive information (the opposite trajectory of dysfunctional “noise” or chaos, entropic lack of “difference”–G. Bateson) is explicitly binomial within metaphysical human comprehension of physical universe.

Gravity’s (0)-Core universal septum between right and left, up and down, in and out, cultural perspectives is logically equivalent with time’s every-present “now” boundary, distinguishing past spatial evolution from future’s co-symbiotic emergent syntax.

If we transpose trinitarian dimensions of cosmology, Taoism, and Christianity, the intrinsically coincidental nature of 3-in-1 identity of binomial synergetics may look more familiar.

Progenitor – “Fr”       Energy                Tao

Creation – “Son”       Space-convex     Yang – power

Spirit – nature           Time-bilateral      Yin(yin) balance

Perhaps Taoism and Christianity each add a Prime Principle of Thermodynamic Balance to the scientific view that energy is perpetually conserved. If so, it may also be the case that information, like all spatial form and memory and code and iconic symbolism, is binomially conserved through the balance of Polynomial with Not-Not Polynomial Information algorithmic bicameral processing assumptions.

 

Metaphysics as Metric Systemics

Math, understood as metric systemic language, forms a teleological bounary between eco-terra conscientific truth, fairness, goodness, beauty, proportional balance, Logos of harmonic v. dissonant physical form,

on one hand, and on the lower-darker side of the cognitive boundary, within Freud’s “subconscious”,

eso-teric Mythic Dark spirit-natural double-binding relationships within metaphysical cultures; like numerology and alchemy, mythology and astrology and crystal-gazing.

Cosmology is the Positive Landscape of math’s scientific articulation, calculation, stratefication, group and set logical-identity theories, applied to positive cosmological flow patterns, like evolution, rhythms, seasons, biological and ecological functions and frequencies, environ-mental eco-normic systemization. An ancient Chinese word for this cosmological metrical systemization is “chi;” sometimes translated as “soul.” Metric system languages, to be successful, to endure, must be fully deductive and inductive accessible to consciousness, equivalently regenerative and decompositional, as intelligibly regenerative information, rather than random irrational chaos and cognitive dissonance. Metric systemic articulation would appear appropriate and sufficient, perhaps even necessary, language for learning about primal, origination, optimization, ultimate destiny predication cosmological issues bridging Teilhard de Chardin’s blinding diastatic enlightenment Omega Point with our more secular Solar Systemic Black Hole.

This Black Hole has shown both a Steven Hawking intensely transparent +Vectoral face OVER its more traditional (-,-) vortexial, mutually gravitational, Double Dark relationship as Binomial (0) soul, within math’s Group Theory (see Gregori Perelman, for example), which might be labeled, if one did believe we live within a metrically relational system, as a Universal Field Theory of Everything.

David Bohm and Buckminster Fuller coincidentally and correlationally developed cosmological theories of geometric/biometric binomial analogical [equals binary digital] Universal Form as bi-cioncidental and dia-correlational dual universed. Universe’s convex face is +protonic vertex “Explicate Order” AND universal dynamic double-dark function as (-,-) neutron/electromagnetic, gravitational thermodynamic, ionic, ergodic balance of four equivalent (fractal formed natural syntax) spacetime vortex “Implicate Order”, which is considerably more rationally accessible than a “cloud of unknowing,” entropic chaos engulfed in cognitive dissonance.

Also coincidentally, but further removed culturally and paradigmatically, Julian Jaynes’ life work explored an evolutionary ethological theory (functionally equivalent to a “teleological” theory) of bicameral consciousness through neural design and bi-systemic development.  Jaynes authenticated his evolutionary perspective with anthropological records of the development of communication as left-brain deductive language dominance over an older “bicameral” emergence stage of schizophrenic communication between Ego-Left hemisphere listening to the Elder Right-brain’s exegetical “God” governance messages. These messages began with what to do in a synaptic crisis, lacking explicit-deduced information, thereby initiating a threshold of dissonant “sub”conscious awareness. This psychological view of cultural evolution provides a SuperEco-Progenitor creating Logos syntax, icons, nomials, memes, and eventually numeric form and function; all this to further Left-brain’s pilgrimage toward a more comprehensive consciousness.

Bicameral dynamics of Left-languaged-Logos v. Right-temporal-relational-Mythos seem generally consistent with subsequent split-brain research. A +/(-,-) 0-centric dimensional metric system might hypothesize a neurally bicameral anthrocentric balancing brain shares a primal metric binomiality of form and function with Explicate Universe(+) OVER neural electronic (-,-) implicating (mutual-gravitational inhale function) relationship of balanced thermodynamic and electromagnetic function. Prime root systemetrics are only regeneratively sustained fractals within a 4 equivalent dynamic syntaxed universe, as suggested by the structure of RNA and its DNA bi-elliptical cousin. DNA’s regenerative intelligence predicts both a progenitive AND (0)Mega bilaterally universal spacetime as +Binomial Left-deductive informational language = (-,-) Binomial Right-inductive functional-temporal prime metric Dark Relationship. Fuller was particularly taken with the notion of RNA’s fractal syntax having evolved metric Optimally Continuous Quality Improvement regenerative normative structure for 4-Based universal dynamic intelligence

Wrapping in the Clay Math P v. NP metric issue, looking for a metric language that could predict resonance and resolution of algorithms in real-timespace, we might restate Gregori Perelman’s (0)-Soul Theorem as

+P v. (-)NP

OVER

+P/(-,-)0 bi-normative smooth-fractal syntaxed, 0-dimensional chi, soul, convex/concave balanced eco-core metasystemic universe.

Informational octaves are +/(-) double-bound QByte branches on a reverse hierarchical, Win-Win Game Tree of Life and Death; all equivalent, yet ectosymbiotic language, for

Polypathic “Good” v. Not-Polynomial “Evil” irrationality of cognitive dissonance.

However, as we culturally step into the bicameral-binomial solar systemic and anthrocentric neural systemic double-hypothesis that Polynomial Spatial Information (regenerative spin) = Not-Not Polynomial Temporal Exformation (decompositional spin), this could articulate a real-spacetime comprehensive consciousness polypathically transcending analogical, ecological, economic, and binary-digital information/exformation paradigms.

Note to Bill Laporte-Bryan: Quirks = +QBytes, I think?, and (-/-) Binomial Quits = +/-0-dimensional QBits of primally syntaxed information, nested in octave “QBytes”, operating in bicameral information processing “open” systems with P=NP = +/(-,-) double-binding heuristic syntax double-binding boundary settings for systemic logic. The alternative theory is Chaos Theory, which I think is about cognitive dissonance and cosmological entropy rather than cognitive bicameral consciousness and cosmological negentropic dark eco-holonic relationship (think “unitarian” as appositional to “Universalist” as polycultural is to monocultural value-function. [Also see: “Theory of Everything”, http://www.billlaportebryan.com and wikipedia.com, “qubit”.]

Standard
Uncategorized

Still Within Time’s Core

Still within this beginning of Time,
Her Goddess planted
one Tree of Life and Death
regenerating cycles of RNA intelligence
and permaculture.

RNA was and is in and of this Tree of Time
searching for what might rhyme
and rhythm as DNA collateral,
bi-elliptically smooth structuring
boundaries of genetic syntax.

Sun God impregnated RNA’s
Tree Time of ReGeneration
sprouting DNA’s bicameral disposition
as if the Tree of Life and Death
had itself transformed
into a Second Millennial Tee of Knowledge of “Good” and “Evil”
as Life and Death,
ego’s left-brain deductive transposition
of eco’s right-brain Yang v. Yin disposition,
primal relationship,
comprehensively bilateral,
binomial.

DNA started developing
icons and symbols of natural system experience,
and their dynamic seasonal-fractal perennial development,
numeric systems,
then linguistically encultured language,
new left-brain deductive grew Yang positive-dominant
OVER
elder right-brain’s RNA,
more inclusively intuitive yin-yin’s ecological reason
still squarely functional
within information’s 0-core fractal-binomial,
gravitational as centrifugal balancing eternity
of Time’s +/(-,-) tap root.

Eventually,
in this Third Millennium,
a binary digital 3rd echo-wave
liminally reflects both Trees coincidentally
through each other’s evolutionary historical root system.

Bionic system intelligence grows where planted in QBits,
8 Bits per octaved, double-fractal, Byte,
open-systemic root systems
in bicamerally comprehensive consciousness systems
of information polynomial
OVER
not-not self-perpetuating polynomial
eisegetical wisdom
pre-languaged exformation
as “death”
“dissonance”
“negatively correlational coincidence”
“paradox of Pandora’s temporally co-redemptive convex v. concave redundant Box”
“bad”
“Dark Hole pregenetive root compost dense diastasis”
“reverse-hierarchical Tree co-operative economic prescient information”
“cognitive dissonance ‘un’consciousness”
“intuitive personal knowledge”
sorting through subconscious pre-language right-brained cultural awareness,
core tap rooted,
still spacetime’s RNA fractally unfolding
com-post
prime relational function.

Bodies function much better as intentional co-operatives
divested of endosymbiotic Win-Lose competitive monocultural entities,
toxic cancerous uncivil warriors within,
arguing about who will rule this formerly polycultural evolutioning nest.

Standard
Uncategorized

Dr. Time’s Dipolar Rant

What’s up?
Thanks for this second interview,
old man.

You are either blind or confused,
but probably both.

Well, thanks,
and I appreciate you as well.
Now, I understand you want to talk about human consciousness.

We comprehend your language as limiting human consciousness.

Now would that be the royal “we”
or are you assuming something about me
or the entire human race?

Yes, although be careful not to confuse royalty with governance.
Royalty is best democratized for universal
and global
and individual self-governance.
This is the subject of considerable ancient poetry
and wisdom.

OK, well,
how about a wide open question
and then you can just say whatever it is you
or we
want to say about human consciousness?

Was that your wide open question
or am I still waiting for it?

Apparently you are still waiting
because you are continuing to respond to my questions
with questions.

Yes, that’s what I wanted to say about human consciousness.
So, any other questions for me today?

I don’t know how I got myself involved with you again.
You are the most ornery pedantic old fart I have ever met.

I resemble that remark
but it is not what I understand as an “open question.”

What would you like to say about consciousness?

Thank you.
That reminds me of the grand opening of Book 1:
The Character of Tao,
entitled “On The Absolute Tao.”
Let me try a post-millennial transposition
of Laotse’s famous treatise:

Book 1: The Coincidentally DiPolar Character of Time
1. On Absolute Time

The Time that can be spoken
Is not comprehensive time;
The Languages that can be given
Are not fully Polynomial-Real
resonate
resolved Information,
or understanding.

Not-Not Binomiality is the origin of “Universe” and “Earth”;
Language-Logos-Left hemisphere
proposes to the Right-hemispheric Eco-Mother
of Earth’s Universal Solar-Fueled System.
Left speaks ego’s anthrocentric
to Right’s mute eco-centric binomially balanced syntax.

Therefore:
Oftentimes, humans purge themselves of ego’s fear-of-death passion
In order to comprehend Life’s Original Intent;
Oftentimes, Universal Time’s comprehensive consciousness regards human passion,
To rediscover its bilaterally eternal flowing form
from past into this present toward future’s past.

This binomial–yin’s secret future time
with yang’s manifest past time–
is one naturally equivalent bilaterally coincidental cycle;
Yin-Future and Yang-Past are given different names
When human language explains their bilateral manifestation
in the present
as polynomially binomial
“not not yet”
and
“not not now”.

Future “not not yet” with Past Polynomial-Yang empowered Information
we language through Present’s comprehensive consciousness,
Logos-Mythos ReConnection
ReCreation
PermaCultural ReGeneration:
Stretching across Future’s Omega Point
down and into Deeper Ecology
Is the Risk and Opportunity Paradox
of Ego’s optimizing Life within Eco’s Balancing ReBirthing Death.

Wow, that sounds really deep Dr. Time
but some of us are really busy trying to get through our day
so if you’re done
I’ll submit this
but don’t expect too much by way of positive outcome
cause that was really out there in the effectiveness department.

You sound disappointed.

Let’s just agree that comprehensive consciousness
seems to lack sufficient informational articulation
to change how I feel about you,
for example.

I suppose that’s why we call it “comprehensive.”
So, let’s try redirecting fear about future deaths
and anger about past deaths
by including both ourselves and our environment
discovering what anger at,
fear about,
oneself can teach
our present consciousness.

What does your present conscience show you
about your justified anger at others,
past events,
society,
significant others;
what does fear about others,
and your future,
teach you about love and kindness
needed for yourself AND
these others,
together,
as a coincidentally correlated relationship through time?

When future-fear and past-anger say
“I don’t have time for you.”
future-love and past-kindness coincidentally say
“I regret not having enough time for us.”

When past-anger says
“I don’t have enough time for me.”
future-love and past-kindness also say
“I regret not having enough time for me
to be with eco-us,
universal-us,
governance-us,
to invest in more comprehensive consciousness,
universal intelligence,
to “sit with the world,”
to re-create,
to co-create,
to co-incidate,
to Right-eco-recenter my Left-ego-identity.”

When love and kindness say
“I have time for you”
future-fear and past-anger are also saying,
“I regret not having enough time for egocentrism.”
but,
future-love and past-kindness only speak within languaged consciousness
when present-tensing time is consciously dominant,
just as future-fear and past-anger only speak
with future and past tense timing dominance.

Anger about past relationships
transactional events within coincidental time,
is also fear about replication within future’s coincidental space
of present-tense comprehensive consciousness.

I’m feeling dizzy and light-headed.

You are dizzy and light-headed.

I just said that.

Binomially eternal time recycles
reiterates
religioning revolutionary
and enlightening intuitive dipolar headed,
as ego turns to fly home to Right-brain centric embrace
bilateral time regains this human race’s natural pace.

Too many words.

That’s OK.
His royal commissioner accused Mozart of too many notes.
Both history and culture had their timely response.
Mozart still sings and dances
because he did not listen to repressive governance messages.

Too many notes, I’ll never get this submitted in time.

Well, time doesn’t wait,
but it doesn’t leave any faster than it arrives.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Medicinal Round

There once was a ruler with crown
so heavy it caused him to frown
when he gave it away
some folks say to this day
it grew lighter while revolving around.

There once were most men with dementia
so heavy it caused them hornetia
when they co-operated away
women say to this day
they grew brighter while playing relentia.

There once was a species competitive
so heavy it paused their co-operative,
when ego turned round
then eco rewound
and Earth grew collaterally revolutative.

There once was a Julian Jaynes,
he noticed our bicameral brains
our Left sends petitions
to Right’s primal conditions
so confluent brains think in trains.

There once was a Buckminster Fuller
who found dominant economics quite duller
than intelligent co-operations
for networking our nations
to grow optimal Tipping Point rudders.

There once was a speaker of Tao
who noticed nature’s patterns of Time,
he said that our space
carries time’s memory of place
a polynomial formation of spacetime.

There once was a Gregori Perelman
who listened to Group Theory’s binomial span
he stuck in a zero
and out plopped a hero
for mythically logical pan-economical fans.

There once was a Clay Math dissonance
searching polynomial informance
it took a long time
to hear monomial’s rhyme
Left’s polynomial evolves Right’s binomial confluence.

There once was a mathematician named Euler
who thought of time’s space as co-ruler
prime relational function
forms places with gumption
convex over concave zeroistic geologic of Fuller.

We once were all rulers with crowns
so heavy they competitively frowned
when we gave them away
spacetime’s polycultural way
grew enlightenment co-operating a round.

Standard
Uncategorized

Ego’s Monstrous Petition

Eco had offered an operational contract
of love and synergy,
awaiting ego’s response each day,
each moment,
eager to optimize these CQI operations of karmic grace.

Over a wilting lifetime
ego implied his petitioning response:

I grow increasingly excited,
stimulated,
by this co-petitioning challenge
to frame our dissonance,
our operational riddles and puzzles,
games and logistics and strategies,
and statistical decomposition
of the odds for sustaining life,
as the perfection of hatred and fear
of death’s dissonant decay.

I petition Earth’s right to positive resolution and resonance,
as implied co-solutions and consonance
of ego with eco
to play, create, and vocation nicely together,
and this co-petition fully exercises my right of conscience,
to re-search competition for absolute freedom of independence.

This co-petition asserts our human natural guild’s lively preference
for contention over contentment,
for longing rather than belonging
for uni-lateral freedom rather than ecollateral interdependence.

Eco absorbed this richly contentious compost,
this dissembling over co-operative rights of assembly
and competition challenging cooperation’s eco-creation
as inclusively diverse recreation,
divisive of ego’s omnipotent present place in space
from eco’s multisystemic functions within time’s good seasons.

Time unfolded an eco-systemic co-tractive gift,
born of Her binomial grace,
an eco-response to mutually co-tribute with ego
gratitude for bi-cameral mutuality
and full freedom of co-scientific consciousness,
to bilaterally participate in time’s eternal moment
of ego- with eco-centric life.

Post Scripted: “After all this time and space,
co-petitions and co-operative contractions,
deductive inducements toward balancing positive space
with negative binomial time,
thank you for remembering why Right brain eco-normics
gave birth to Left brain’s ego-petitions
in our first through last breathing moment of eco-operative identity.”

Signed: Eco’s Polypathic Co-Operative

 

Note: CQI is Continuous Quality Improvement, a standard for program and contractual outcome delivery with design features for decomposition and regeneration of performance information, tied to maintaining long-term progress through morphing consumption of trend data into production of trend improvement.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

For Spacious Time

I need some natural,
organic,
spacious kinda time.
Where is nature in this time,
my time,
our time?

Perhaps nature is to time
as solid forms are to functional creation,
as solidarity is to creativity,
as Yang is to Yin,
as Full-Blown Climaxing polycultural kinda natural jazzy space
enters permacultural swinging revolutionary time,
bangin’ and beatin’ our hearts to ping.

Where was I, again?
Well, never mind,
you can’t go home again
in this polycultural space within permaculturing time.

Shout out to your sisters and your brothers
celebrating their polycultural Universalist space
balancing their Right-brain Co-Synergetic
Unitarian lusty kinda co-operative rhyming time.

Dubois soul sings Beloved Community
rhymes with Positive Integrity,
opposed by that nasty one “mendacity,”
a negative double-binding not yet not true,
our passive-aggressive cultural dissonance,
lack of cooperative resonance,
coupled with abject insolence,
when faced with Beloved Integrity
growing transgressively regenerative
revolutions of space in well-timed
full-racing DNA prime.

Ooh!!

Um-hmmm…

Dubois begat integrity
as Nazareth, that nada nest,
begat love,
as Bucky begat synergy,
as Atlee begat co-intelligence,
as Permaculturally natural eco-logical designs and long-term plants
begat RNA’s ubiquitous wisdom.

Um-hmmm..
Um-hmmm..

If justice is what love looks like in public
and tenderness is what love looks like in private,
I’d say we’re lookin better on the privates of our face
than on the public beaten side of our race
through space
to trace
this RNA place
where eco-justice was most originally defined.

How much more RNA do you really think there could be
in white skin than in black?
And would you not say that RNA is our most omnipotent,
most omnipresent,
most ubiquitous space and time
of intelligently regenerative design?

Yeah, I’m wid you,
I ain’t neve’ heard a no more DNA in The Dominant Left-Brained Man!
I jus’ a dumb cooperative minded gay guy
who thinks you’re playin’ me,
and my playin’ days is over!

Dr. West reminds,
reconnects
religions,
transgenerational catastrophe is to reissuing problems
as torrential flooding is to dust in my cognitive dissonance eyes.
A chronically possessive culture
breeds a catastrophically dispossessive economy.
A competitive economy
breeds a rabid lack of eco-logic.
Cancer cells always consider themselves chronic;
never would think of ourselves as catastrophic,
because we’re just so in love with that Positive Psychology
face in our cultural mirror.

The darker subconscious will have her intuitional revolution day
tonight
as she does every night we dream of polycultures
and nightmare with co-operative strength
against monocultural monotheistic monopolistic monochromatic
monomial universalism.
That’s our Black Hole womb from which our comprehensive consciousness evolved
enlightenment and light,
and bright,
and transparency,
as Father Time’s Left Deductive
gets it on with Mother Space’s Right Inductive,
trans-parentcy.

Discerning justice, integrity, synergy, loving spaces
for here-and-now time,
would best redeem this transparent moment
as co-investment for our co-operative future Time.
Balancing discernment is like learning to ride a bike,
once you get the knack of positive-deductive-left
greets negative co-inductive (double-bind knot,
or not) right,
with self-optimizing cooperative environmental momentum,
sufficient to sustain nature’s well-tempered life,
the rest is just peddling,
day in and night out,
eventually decomposing dismount
into further co-prehensile consciousness of death reborn…

“naturally, organic, spacious kinda’ time
rollin and weavin our narrative songs
sung in RNA’s pre-digital key of UCAG…
swingin’ as we”

why does breathing feel like floating and swimming inside?

and what was that thing called phantom limbs of consciousness?

Um-hmmm…
Sing that song,
all day long!

Ooooh yeah!
Look at our cooperative nature
in this most polyculturing time.

I feel sublime.

Oh yeah,
um-hmmm,
thump to my thump,

Spacious skies.
Golden waves of yummy grain.
Ultra-violet mountain range of consciousness,
Earth’s permaculturally fruitful plain.
Universe’s co-operatively jazzy face.

Standard
Uncategorized

So, Why Is It…?

Why is it:

we plant gardens
but we garden plants?

we call natural medicines drugs
and we call unnaturally produced drugs medicines?

we label our disease-hypnotized industrial-insurance complex
as our “health care system”?

we prefer fetal alcohol syndrome, pickled livers, and dead drunk outcomes
to THC induced probable failure to ever develop yet another over-yanged Type A personality,
with an antisocial proclivity for sprouting pickled livers and other deadly outcomes?

we tend to respond to uninvited Type B personality invitations
with Type A fully-alert personalities,
yet we respond to uninvited Type A demands
with Type B laissez-faire, neglect, and cognitively buzzed dissonance?

the older our nation grows
the younger our culture appears to prefer?

we pay more and more to elect politicians
who produce positive policy priorities and outcomes less and less?

the louder and longer I persist in persuading you of my wisdom
the shorter and softer grows your attention span
and capacity to hear me?

we produce prodigious amounts of dispossession destined for the trash
yet we seldom intend to ever possess and take ownership of our future trash?

economists respond to something called ecologic
as if their home eco turf were some alien craziness?

domineering competitive Business As Usuals
fail to see they are a sustainable cooperative economy’s
most significant mentor for disinvestment,
and design and development priorities?

every climaxing polyculture produces a master permaculturalist,
but not every master permaculturalist
has ever produced a long-term, sustainable-optimization-of-life-systems
polyculture?

we seldom have enough time to notice and appreciate new places and faces
but we drag through ponderous time invested in the same ol’, same ol’ faces
and spaces?

every meme has its own elitist establishment paradigm
but super-paradigm is not a meme?

if some communication event between two people
is called a transaction
then we think “economics,”
but if some communication event between two non-human systems
is called a relationship
then we think “ecosystem”?

that analogy is to logic
as ecology is to logic
but ecological arguments
are culturally dismissed as “merely analogical”?

that digital information is always binary
but polynomial information is not assumed to also flow binomially balanced,
like +1 = (-,-)0,
as Yang-Space = Yin/Yin Time,
as Left-brain dominant econormics = Right-brain double-binding ecosystems?

we temporally garden spatial rooted plants
and we spatially plant co-evolving rooted gardens?

Standard
Uncategorized

Time’s TransParent River

There is nothing weaker than water
But none is superior to it in overcoming the hard,
For which there is no substitute.
(Laotse, “Nothing Weaker Than Water”, Lin Yutang, trans.)

That weakness of mind and body overcomes strength
And unitarian co-gentleness overcomes universalist rigidity,
No Yang does not know;
No yin can put into practice.

Therefore the Sage Says:
“Who receives unto self the MLK calumny of the world
Is the preserver of an equilibrious state.
Who bears the dissonant sins of the world’s living systems
Is the resonantly full-conscious mentor within this NOW world moment.”

Straight words seem crookedly dissonant, distorted, unparadigmed.
Evolution’s Time seems revolutionary.
(Adapted from “Nothing Weaker Than Water”)

Prophecy’s weakness is lack of redemptive empowerment.

The strength of prophecy
for redemptive effectiveness
is its weakness
as culturally dissonant.
Too much dissonance is dismissed as insanity
or sainthood
or martyrdom
or suicide.

Too little dissonance is not co-prophetic
and therefore not redemptive.

This cutting edge
tipping wu-wei point of rationality
is the weakness of optimally ebbing and flowing water
as ecological synergy
as Positive Yang balancing Negentropic Yin-Yin
Win-Win
Double SpaceTime Binding Teleology.

When Yin-Water absorbs Earth,
then She becomes stagnant entropy,
chaos,
disorganized
dissonantly dismayed
unable to continue flowing,
flexing,
fluxing,
surfing.
A Universalist Yin EcoCenter
evolves as stagnant pond
what were dynamic rivers,
seasonally surfing oceans–
a Holding Space wherein Time stands relativistically
and 3-dimensionally,
still,
like a vacuum of interior landscaped atmosphere;
more likely to produce a horrific monoculture
of mold and mosquitoes
than motion
and revolutionary change.
For this we want Time’s river function,
swelling springs of Transmillennial comprehensive consciousness.

Western Business-As-Usual culture
understands love as “kindness.”
Coincidentally,
Eastern permacultural comprehensive consciousness of Time
as panentheistic and teleological “love”
evokes mutual, co-redemptive, namaste–
A Buberian mutually mentored I-Thou bow.

Love,
mutual gratitude of synergetic energy,
requires a Bucky Fuller dynamic balance
between freedom to comprehend and embrace
our eco-center in each eternal moment,
as subconscious freedom from awareness of only Ego,
our more limited Left-brain’s “small-self” center.

Kindness, and unkindness,
are gratefully, and rudely,
extended, not extended,
to ourselves as empathized “Other.”
These are ego-ionic actions
to teach us how to be more mutually generous
in each of our primal relationships
with Love’s ecological comprehension
of Time’s Yangish and Yinnish rebalancing ways.

What is fair,
within contentious issues,
is found where our mutually held eco-center points,
always wu-wei midway between
the most Yang-power value extreme
and the most Yin laissez-faire “both-and” inclusively unitarian absorbency.
Nature abhores a perfect vacuum of either Yang or Yin;
omnisciently insists on Left with Right languaged intelligence.

When we identify with a “downstream” yin position,
our underdog empathy extends to include
reaching toward increasingly marginalized and irrational
“Other” position of empathic identity.
Our eco-centric Right-brain starts from this position,
as a holonic reiteration of “Self’s” encultured history,
then flows economic and ecological “generosity”
of loving values
“upstream” toward our mutually mentored,
taught,
tautly experienced,
planted and rooted and trimmed and pulled, and encoded lexicon,
decomposed and empathized,
intuited Yang position,
looking for that tipping point boundary of the collective unconscious
wide enough to capture all synergetically oriented reiterators
racing issues through our surfing moments and lives.

Justice trickles up and out,
as well as down and in,
washing back and forth through fields of unconscious cognitive dissonance,
to emerge toward a consensus of collectively generous,
but not overly generous,
merciful,
inclusive coredeemer ecojustice.
An enculturation laundry,
but go easy on the yin-bleach.

If I lacked something of the “underdog,”
the “understory,”
the “criminal” and “crazy”
within my holonic human nature,
then my nature would be neither holonic nor human.
Yang’s “bad boy” universalist megalomania
and sociopathological ego-power
is a challenging competitive dimension
within our ego-centric,
anthropomorphic view
of evolution’s meaning;
while Yin’s ubiquitous “Other”-love as “Self,”
generosity to the extreme of unitarian self-exiting wishfulness,
is our more primal RNA holonic-cellular intelligence
of generosity’s ecological win-win scenario,
devoid of ego’s self-distinguishing,
and often dissonant,
and too loud,
and Left-brain dominant,
voice and language.

Kindness and unkindness are transactions between unequals.
Generosity and stinginess of empathy,
what eco-consciousness invites
as appropriately proportional response,
are transactions between mutual mentors
of gratitude, and lack thereof.

Differences between ego’s intended kindness
and eco’s well-practiced generosity
include a Taoist position that kindness and unkindness
are not found in nature,
although love,
as synergetic mutual gravity,
is the source of natural systems,
of bilateral life and time,
as opposed to the existence of…
well…
nothing; entropic unconsciousness.

Kindness suggests I am extending something to another
that this person has not earned,
does not rightfully and justly deserve
within the normal flow of time’s river.

Generosity is a mutually intended practice
of radical equanimity and empathy,
a grateful acceptance of our profound interdependence
of cause and effect,
stimulus and response.
Generosity is about absorbing and hopefully co-redeeming
our mutual assets and liabilities
to resolve an issue
whose outcome can be a mutual win
from a position of profoundly radical
coincidental/correlational
mutually mentored co-identity.
Trans-parentcy.

You have shown me who you are right now
so I may choose to respond
with who we could become right now
if we move from this position forward
within our positively synergetic, generous, practice
of mutual namaste.

There is nothing weaker than yin’s subconscious water
But none is superior to it in overcoming yang’s unconscious soul,

Standard