“At the deepest level of reality the only force is gravity.”
Bill Laporte-Bryan (www.billlaportebryan.com, “A Theory of Everything”)
In the beginning was bilateral, binomial, mutually prime relational, gravity.
Gravity is convexly expressed as positively radiant 3-spatial dimension curvilinear, ionic-balance-seeking energy.
Gravity is concavely impressed as binomially negative ergodic-balance-remembering (0)-dimensional syntropy. Buckminster Fuller defines syntropy as “Energy associative [rather than radiantly disassociative] as matter precession [emergent, or predicated, predicted, potential, and/or Bohm’s Implicate Order], gravity, magnetic, interference knotting.” (p. 694, 1975, Synergetics)
A prime gravitational epicenter is compatible with Euler’s view that universe’s geometric form follows prime relational “crossover” function. Bucky adds positive-space to double-knotted-time to Eulerian metric prime relational function. It is this intersection of cosmology and the abstractions of metric Group Theory that I anticipated Max Tegmark might mention in his work on universe as math-rooted (2014).
From this bi-dimensional prime perspective, as convex v. concave expression of universally coserved energy, convex explicit-positive radiant expression takes on a permacultural face of physical universe’s emergence through time; our cosmic breathing outward.
A reverse-temporal view of (0)-sum gravitational emergence may lead us back to an elder point of dense Origin as the gravitational Black Hole breathing in of Time’s de-spaciating, re-integrative energy.
This perspective on the evolving nature of an emergent spacetime universe seems compatible with Buckminster Fuller’s view that Physical Universe = Gravity * Radiant-Energy(squared), which Bucky understood as his transposition of Einstein’s E=M * c(squared).
This bilateral view of convex/radiant and concave/gravitational conservation of ionic-positive and ergodic-doublenegative energy is also ecologically equivalent to Taoism’s prime dynamic relatioinship of Yang v. Yin functions. Yang has the classic teleologist’s positive-emergent-power perspective, while Yin enjoys a more mystically esoteric, “camouflage,” double-negative, not this-not that, gravitational (0)-sum ergodic conservancy, rooted in reverse-temporal (permacultural) memory.
Just as gravity is intrinsically binomial with physical universe, so too radiantly positive information (the opposite trajectory of dysfunctional “noise” or chaos, entropic lack of “difference”–G. Bateson) is explicitly binomial within metaphysical human comprehension of physical universe.
Gravity’s (0)-Core universal septum between right and left, up and down, in and out, cultural perspectives is logically equivalent with time’s every-present “now” boundary, distinguishing past spatial evolution from future’s co-symbiotic emergent syntax.
If we transpose trinitarian dimensions of cosmology, Taoism, and Christianity, the intrinsically coincidental nature of 3-in-1 identity of binomial synergetics may look more familiar.
Progenitor – “Fr” Energy Tao
Creation – “Son” Space-convex Yang – power
Spirit – nature Time-bilateral Yin(yin) balance
Perhaps Taoism and Christianity each add a Prime Principle of Thermodynamic Balance to the scientific view that energy is perpetually conserved. If so, it may also be the case that information, like all spatial form and memory and code and iconic symbolism, is binomially conserved through the balance of Polynomial with Not-Not Polynomial Information algorithmic bicameral processing assumptions.
Metaphysics as Metric Systemics
Math, understood as metric systemic language, forms a teleological bounary between eco-terra conscientific truth, fairness, goodness, beauty, proportional balance, Logos of harmonic v. dissonant physical form,
on one hand, and on the lower-darker side of the cognitive boundary, within Freud’s “subconscious”,
eso-teric Mythic Dark spirit-natural double-binding relationships within metaphysical cultures; like numerology and alchemy, mythology and astrology and crystal-gazing.
Cosmology is the Positive Landscape of math’s scientific articulation, calculation, stratefication, group and set logical-identity theories, applied to positive cosmological flow patterns, like evolution, rhythms, seasons, biological and ecological functions and frequencies, environ-mental eco-normic systemization. An ancient Chinese word for this cosmological metrical systemization is “chi;” sometimes translated as “soul.” Metric system languages, to be successful, to endure, must be fully deductive and inductive accessible to consciousness, equivalently regenerative and decompositional, as intelligibly regenerative information, rather than random irrational chaos and cognitive dissonance. Metric systemic articulation would appear appropriate and sufficient, perhaps even necessary, language for learning about primal, origination, optimization, ultimate destiny predication cosmological issues bridging Teilhard de Chardin’s blinding diastatic enlightenment Omega Point with our more secular Solar Systemic Black Hole.
This Black Hole has shown both a Steven Hawking intensely transparent +Vectoral face OVER its more traditional (-,-) vortexial, mutually gravitational, Double Dark relationship as Binomial (0) soul, within math’s Group Theory (see Gregori Perelman, for example), which might be labeled, if one did believe we live within a metrically relational system, as a Universal Field Theory of Everything.
David Bohm and Buckminster Fuller coincidentally and correlationally developed cosmological theories of geometric/biometric binomial analogical [equals binary digital] Universal Form as bi-cioncidental and dia-correlational dual universed. Universe’s convex face is +protonic vertex “Explicate Order” AND universal dynamic double-dark function as (-,-) neutron/electromagnetic, gravitational thermodynamic, ionic, ergodic balance of four equivalent (fractal formed natural syntax) spacetime vortex “Implicate Order”, which is considerably more rationally accessible than a “cloud of unknowing,” entropic chaos engulfed in cognitive dissonance.
Also coincidentally, but further removed culturally and paradigmatically, Julian Jaynes’ life work explored an evolutionary ethological theory (functionally equivalent to a “teleological” theory) of bicameral consciousness through neural design and bi-systemic development. Jaynes authenticated his evolutionary perspective with anthropological records of the development of communication as left-brain deductive language dominance over an older “bicameral” emergence stage of schizophrenic communication between Ego-Left hemisphere listening to the Elder Right-brain’s exegetical “God” governance messages. These messages began with what to do in a synaptic crisis, lacking explicit-deduced information, thereby initiating a threshold of dissonant “sub”conscious awareness. This psychological view of cultural evolution provides a SuperEco-Progenitor creating Logos syntax, icons, nomials, memes, and eventually numeric form and function; all this to further Left-brain’s pilgrimage toward a more comprehensive consciousness.
Bicameral dynamics of Left-languaged-Logos v. Right-temporal-relational-Mythos seem generally consistent with subsequent split-brain research. A +/(-,-) 0-centric dimensional metric system might hypothesize a neurally bicameral anthrocentric balancing brain shares a primal metric binomiality of form and function with Explicate Universe(+) OVER neural electronic (-,-) implicating (mutual-gravitational inhale function) relationship of balanced thermodynamic and electromagnetic function. Prime root systemetrics are only regeneratively sustained fractals within a 4 equivalent dynamic syntaxed universe, as suggested by the structure of RNA and its DNA bi-elliptical cousin. DNA’s regenerative intelligence predicts both a progenitive AND (0)Mega bilaterally universal spacetime as +Binomial Left-deductive informational language = (-,-) Binomial Right-inductive functional-temporal prime metric Dark Relationship. Fuller was particularly taken with the notion of RNA’s fractal syntax having evolved metric Optimally Continuous Quality Improvement regenerative normative structure for 4-Based universal dynamic intelligence
Wrapping in the Clay Math P v. NP metric issue, looking for a metric language that could predict resonance and resolution of algorithms in real-timespace, we might restate Gregori Perelman’s (0)-Soul Theorem as
+P v. (-)NP
+P/(-,-)0 bi-normative smooth-fractal syntaxed, 0-dimensional chi, soul, convex/concave balanced eco-core metasystemic universe.
Informational octaves are +/(-) double-bound QByte branches on a reverse hierarchical, Win-Win Game Tree of Life and Death; all equivalent, yet ectosymbiotic language, for
Polypathic “Good” v. Not-Polynomial “Evil” irrationality of cognitive dissonance.
However, as we culturally step into the bicameral-binomial solar systemic and anthrocentric neural systemic double-hypothesis that Polynomial Spatial Information (regenerative spin) = Not-Not Polynomial Temporal Exformation (decompositional spin), this could articulate a real-spacetime comprehensive consciousness polypathically transcending analogical, ecological, economic, and binary-digital information/exformation paradigms.
Note to Bill Laporte-Bryan: Quirks = +QBytes, I think?, and (-/-) Binomial Quits = +/-0-dimensional QBits of primally syntaxed information, nested in octave “QBytes”, operating in bicameral information processing “open” systems with P=NP = +/(-,-) double-binding heuristic syntax double-binding boundary settings for systemic logic. The alternative theory is Chaos Theory, which I think is about cognitive dissonance and cosmological entropy rather than cognitive bicameral consciousness and cosmological negentropic dark eco-holonic relationship (think “unitarian” as appositional to “Universalist” as polycultural is to monocultural value-function. [Also see: “Theory of Everything”, http://www.billlaportebryan.com and wikipedia.com, “qubit”.]