Uncategorized

Pleasing Answers Prefer Passionate Questions

Do heated questions hope to end with cool answers,
while pleasing answers never end
without yet more compassionate questions?

How are Case Studies
of anxious organic history
different than sacred Einstein’s
anticipating Thought Experiments?

Wait a minute…

Yes, well that’s not really a difference.
Thought Experiments and Case Studies
both begin with waiting a minute

to notice cause v effect assumptions,
to decompose bifurcated relationships
between sacredly interrelated organic parts

of what
and whom?

Imagining in reverse time,
from now as cause
back toward effects
leading up to my current favorite cause

current noticing,
sometimes chaotic and unsettling
waiting a minute
to notice struggling against

Feels worse
than struggling with?

Do brains
casing out disorganized thoughts
feel more important
than brawn?

And why is this different
than why that?

Does, or does not,
organic complexity
actively hope
for resonant riches?

Is this really democracy’s healthiest question to ask?

Within all Earth’s vast universe
of sacred questions,
could love invest in life more
instead of hell less?

Is this, more or less, probably more,
what you are trying to point out
before I interrupt your thoughtful minute?

Do democratic rulers
find Golden Rules flattering,
and their reverse fascinating?

When don’t richer Case outcomes
invite more fertile Thought Experiments?

Why have I never heard of,
but often experienced,
a dysfunctional paralysis case
for more dysfunctional family studies?

And how is that different than,
or the same as,
an unhealthy patriarchal
and unsafe capitalist
Case Study?

Wait a minute,
when did we begin
declaring positions
always remain the same
when not opposed?

to asking about appositions?

Do we all start with co-passionate noticing?

Can we reverse hot times
back through bio-eros networks
of bilateral climaxing opportunity?

Yes, I suppose so,
but Einstein’s Thought Experiments were metaphysical,
cold mathematics
and unnatural science,
Aren’t Case Studies more like watching non-pornographic Reality Shows,
weaponized capitalist, and usually strong-man, Disaster Movies,
Freudian Nightmares on Mean Sheets?

How do I know
you hope to respond
to your own questions
with better questions?

about how thought systems are the same
when they don’t feel different?

Sorry, honey,
do you agree or disagree,
or both, somehow,
that Einstein’s Experiments are about metaphysical operations
while Case Studies
are about physical and natural operas?

Wait, a minute…
no, that doesn’t sound ecologically correct,
nor feel logically helpful

Are we better
sticking with naturally stuck wealth
realities
or freeing Earth’s spiritually flowing health
relationships?

Didn’t Einstein hope his Thought Experiments would lead to Truth,
therefore, not also False,
much less Ugly?

Measuring statements about space and speed
revolving time
and gratuitous power

evolving mass
and volunteering light?

When you write extended Dysfunctional Family Case Studies,
do you hope you speak Truth
but not Beauty?

About positive,
and, unfortunately, negative energy,
(0)-sum speed of sharing light,
massively devolving power,
a feeling of insufficient healing time
for sufficient health and safety
final answers.

Why is Truth
not always Beauty?

Because that would be confusing

Winning facts
with loser feelings?

If you say so,
but if thoughts grow complex
when do feelings show chaotic risk
and calming climate opportunities?

Wait a minute.
Sorry love.
When do Thought Experiments shut down?

Either True or False premises?

When was the last time you indulged
winning thrival opportunities,
and not losing survival risks?

Writing a lively Case Study
about love’s Thought Experiments

In Win/Win
bilaterally climaxing
mind thought
and body felt
co-passion Cases?

Well, when you ask that way
you come across
less of a dispassionate
Me win vs You lose

Dominating ass?

Who wouldn’t have the first clue
how a dogmatic Life Case Study
might feel less inviting
than a dog-gone lovely Thought Experiment.

Wait a minute…
You’re doing thoughts again.

That thing where you LeftBrain explicate
answers
while I RightBrain implicate
questions?

That somehow do not really quite exist
just yet

Outside of spaceless now
and timeless here?

Biassed
in favor of ecstatic climax
erotic fireworks!

You’re just teasing me, aren’t you?
This cums down to foreplay
in your favorite Thought Experiment?

I feel so used.

Don’t pretend your gorgeous Case Study
doesn’t like it.

Could you talk a little dirtier,
and leave out the exploitive capital
and over-rated patriarchal parts?

Less sacredly surreal
and more organically earthy?

Ummm.
That sounds like you’re ready

to stop performing
and start engaging?

Baby,
you’re the writing Sage

Asking if you
are still my dancing Muse?

Does your musing question hope to end
sooner or later?

With only one most sage answer.

Do answers ever end experiments
without yet more amusing
Curious Study questions?

Wait a minute,
did we leave out
our sexy
and sacred climaxing parts?

My mind feels so bruised,

My body too unused?

Standard
Uncategorized

Zero

Word Problem:
What is the political
and economic
and moral difference
between a -1 communist concentration camp
and a +1 capitalist detention camp?

Hint:
Probably the same Christian taxpayer difference
between
-0 (emptiness):

SUBTRACT empowering hope
for a healthy democracy,
Red and Yellow
Black and White
they are precious
in His sight

and
+0 (fullness):

ADD disempowering despair
of stealthy stupid kleptocracy,
pitching Red against Yellow
Black against White
liberal SkyBlue dreams
against conservational EarthGreen realities

Economically unsafe
and politically unhealthy

MotherEarth
laid inhumane waste,
dark stark global disrepair.

Capitalist detention camp distinctions
without communist concentration camp differences

DeGenerative World Problem UnSolution:
a +1 v -1 Total-itarian risk.

ReGenerative Word Problem ReSolution:
a Win/Win +0 and -0 CoBinary
Making Earth Great Again
healthy democratic CoIntelligent
ecological-economic opportunity.

Standard
Uncategorized

Healthy Caring Systems

Too many times sadly
too seldom gladly
I must learn to trust
Earth’s future more

Both Father Sun’s timeless
rounds of enlightenment
and Mother Earth’s
codependent rhythms
regenerating rich
empowering
soulful soil

And this trusting more
impels healing trauma’s lessons,
surviving hale and hearty lust
for too RightWing earned distrust

Unenlightened AnthroElitism
within our CommonEnglish languaged voice
while dismissing other naturally iconic sounds
and physical sights,
sacred smells
and mental tastes

Feelings that matter more
than mere white privileged noise
degenerating ego v eco-other
for mere win today
lose survival tomorrow

Much less anthro-resilient healthy
this RightFright Yang v yin militaristic
narcissistic AnthroSurvival

And we could also regenerate
more Yang/Yintegrally together,
rediscover strong and sacred Beauty
peak experience passions

CoInvested integrity’s historic
win/win therapeutic revival,
future multiculturing
verbal and nonverbal
compassionately thriving
and not merely nonviolently surviving
1/0 double-binary bipartisan polypaths
polynomial +1P=(-,-)0P, Tao wu-wei bilateral balance
0/1 cisbinary communication’s
deepest
and most peak
health (1 Universe)
wealth (0 Full/Empty Synergetic Ego/EcoBalancing)
bipartisan ecopolitical health care potential.

That is where we left off yesterday;
and today let us reconsider a related question
about more personal peak experience outcomes
of a health care bipartisan co-governing system.

First, we notice that robust polycultural systems
of win/win thrival
will always be negatively correlated with
exhausted monocultural failing Lose/Lose chaos

despair
trauma
chronic stress
degeneration
death
entropy
lack of any imaginable and/or remembered system

Re-articulating integrity’s most sacred,
and sometimes sexy,
peak regenerative experiences

Feeding our LeftBrain need for EitherYangly Yes
Or TooYinnish Yes and not yet know

Consistency with prior experiential
labeling of penetrating history.

What are our universal characteristics
defining and refining caring systems?

Sounds like we may be speaking nonviolently
of spacious and NowTimed compassion
and co-investment,
and active curiosity.

That works for me,
so let’s go one LeftBrain dominant step
further into verbally defining
what we might all agree
we win/win intend
to successfully differentiate
our health care resilient thrival systems
from our pathological uncare
unfelt lack of any non-degenerative
LoseLose chaos
entropy
despair
trauma
chronic ego/ecocidal
lack of unconditional
warm regard,
retributive blaming
and shaming
straight white monotheistic
monopolizing core panentheistic values
monoculturing neurosystemic despair
depression
oppression
full-spectral Win/Win suppression
of integrity’s compassionate
warm and caring
systemic potential

This recontextualing process
follows an ecological perception principle (EPP)
that it is not polyvagally possible to imagine
or remember ever feeling a caring system
that could co-incidentally be nonverbally noticed
much less defined
or even moderately refined
as any something
or non-peak co-relationally felt event.

Lack of warm unconditional win/win
sacred panentheistic regard
may feel as chronically anxious
as trying to re-imagine
an uncaring entropic
cold as a closed
non-systemic
vacuum of exflowing
information.

What we are capable of appreciating,
deeply rooted in ecological
and biological experience,
are Caring Systems
and not uncaring non-systems.

To define systems feels challenging
because systems, including organic
and Whole
and Open
and Universal Healthy Caring Systems,
all feel so overwhelmingly
and perhaps sacredly comprehensive,
synergetically complex.

Within your own neurosystemic framework,
maturing,
robustly thriving,
perhaps even enjoying elegant
and/or multiculturally exotic
and/or polyculturally erotic
peak Aha! Win/Win
Yang/Yintegral co-balancing experiences

As appositionally contrasted
against a monochromatic win now to lose tomorrow
or win EarthHealth Care Systems tomorrow
by sacrificing AnthroWealth Care Systems today

False dichotomies
nurture chronic trauma,
fear and retribution,
fire and thunder,
conspiracy theories,
like the witchhunt
or the devil
made me addictively
and obsessively,
sometimes violently,
sometimes greedily,
sometimes abusively,
sometimes neglectfully,
always anthro-narcissistically
think it
say it
do it to Eco-You

Lose/Win Dissociated
from interdependently nurtured
and anti-spiritually natured
independent Win/Lose surviving
Ego-Me

Here
in cooperative home
and Now
in my 71st revolutionary round

Too many times sadly
too seldom gladly
deep and widely learning
to trust Earth’s curiously sacred
and courageous
peak health
and valley of integral wealth
win/win health care systemic
Yang InFormation
and Yintegral OutFlow

Networks of not-not
double-binding neurosystemic apposition,
sadly anxious
and gladly anticipating more nonviolent dialogue,
less win/lose zero-sum debate
for and against future’s EarthTribal WinWin gains
rethriving positive regeneration thoughts

Less conservatively unbalanced
degenerative negative
anti-eco/pantheo-logical feelings,
Ego Monotheistic Nature v Eco PanEntheistic Polycultural Spirit

More resident of EarthCare Global Peace Systems
cooperative, so not just competitively capitalistic
ecosystemically co-invested in continental/oceanic balance,
so less win/lose survival of one sovereign entitled nation

Or species
straight white male privileged
LeftBrain verbally dominant
anthrosupremacist win/lose or lose/win
karmic conspiracy anxious theories

Not yet anticipating
more deeply integral possibilities

Health caring systems
invite LeftBrain integrity’s inclusive
secular-1/sacred-0
ecotheistic EarthTribe
interreligious multiculturing wealth
caring compassion systems

Too many times sadly
too seldom gladly
sharing trust
in EarthTribe’s health
wealthy ecofeminist future.

Standard
Uncategorized

Local Living Matters

I hear things right side down
and bottom left side up
as I get older
so consider the source.

Anyway,
I hear Colchester Connecticut Democrats,
and some cross-registering Republicans,
want to establish
a multicultural health commission
concerned about military
and local police mercenaries
feeling discriminated against,
picked on,
unloved,
left out,
under-valued,
ignored,
neglected,
abused,
shot at.

T Rocko is concerned
such a vast investment
in multicultural respect,
solidarity of resonance,
integrity of long-term resiience
through commitment to public dialogue
rather than contentious debate,
could only be justified
with quantitative data

Adding up how much
anti-militarism
and anti-police prejudice
exists
and costs
in Colchester.

In this political
and economic moment
of social cooperative distancing,
dissociation,
scape-goating,
rabid polarization,
toxic partisanship

We need a baseline,
says he,
of mutual disregard,
to measure regenerative progress
and/or degenerative retrenchment
from community integral investments
in health remediation,
inclusive wealth
for future cooperative governing generations.

Rudko,
self-appointed sole guardian
of our public investment purse,
responds,

Supporters of Armed Lives Matter
are “making a generalization…
not based on facts”
that silence means discontent,
speaks echo-chamberly
of feeling an unhealthy
lack of mutually fulfilling safety

Too risky
for speaking up transparently
to listen vulnerably
to all cooperative opportunity “Other”
and “Alien”
and “Immigrant”
And especially Not Straight Male Dominant
voices,
narratives,
aggressive predation stories
of relentless win/lose debate
rather than cooperative win/win dialogue
with social and multicultural intelligence.

Standard
Uncategorized

Power of Compassion

Most Republicans I’ve had the admittedly too infrequent pleasure
of listening to
assume financial wealth
is a greater public responsibility
and opportunity
than very much secondary social wealth
of healthy relationships,
resonant and democratically inclusive resilience.

And, Green Democrats
seem to share a world view
giving primal priority to values of social wealth,
multicultural co-investment
in people,
plants,
planetary inter-relationships,
global compassion.

So, a simple Thought Experiment
in competitive v cooperative relationality:

Imagine you are the ultimate capitalist success story
Playing a zero-sum win/lose game,
you always win,
so everybody else loses.
Eventually all financial assets,
natural resources,
human resources,
belong to you.
There remains no financial competitor left standing.
You are Earth’s omnipotent predator
of all economic value.

What happens to the value
of your capital liquid assets
at the moment you achieve
your perfect monopolistic success?
a perfect vacuum of other economic competitors?

Now, imagine social relationships
are our root source of value.

You develop cooperative relationships
that branch out into a global nurturing
and mutually nutritious network
of co-empowering healthy communication
until, finally, no one stands outside
your robust caring cooperative,
your multiculturally resonant social system.

At the exact moment of perfect synergetic interdependence,
when loneliness,
segregation,
distrust,
apartheid,
dissociation,
antagonistic lack of peaceful relationship
is nothing more than a pre-millennial memory,
what remains of your social,
multicultural
political
and cooperative economic value?

How would you ever finish spending
and extending
your social capital co-investments?

So, when Republicans
and not-so-Green Democrats
sternly inform me
We need a solid Business Model
for a robust and resilient government
and for perpetual economic growth,
I am always curious to learn
which Business Model they have in mind,

Competitive win/lose? Like capitalism,
Or cooperative win/win?
Like sacred Earth communion.

Standard