Key EarthHistory Concepts

Key CapitalistYang/CreolistYin BiCameral Concepts

I find a fuzzy irony in this morning’s early search for a new journal notebook, having filled my last from what had been, five years ago, an inconceivably high pile of empty and near-empty notebooks, set-aside for these diurnal reflections on last night’s RightBrain decompositions.

Having determined I have none left, all now filled from inside their front covers all the way back through both sides of their rough grey cardboard back covers, and yet not even entirely comfortable with retiring sixty-five, I began looking through my Oppositional Defiant Disordered and Fetal Alcohol Syndroming and Cerebral Palsied 15-years-old mulatta’s book bins, filled with reminders of choices rooted in seeing her as maybe emotionally 5, yet with all those young adolescent pheromones to confuse her about who she truly might become, looking yet again for her one yet-empty notebook.

She carries this empty-lined notebook with her everywhere she goes, including bed, as if she were the most intent and intense journal-writer there ever was. And she rather too vigorously rifles through it’s battered dog-eared pages, front to back, back to front, it doesn’t matter. Here, she appears to be reading her journal, and yet finding only blank pages about where she has been, and where she is mulatta going.

Ironic, isn’t it, that my life is filled with riches of chock-full WinWin regenerative diastasis, evolutioning symbiosis, ego/eco-sacred prime relational transubstantiation, both secular and sacred integrity of purpose, and rich deep ecological meaning, and yet her life is so frighteningly filled with one empty notebook, I am currently trying to find, to fill with my life, and hide from her constant search for this same one perpetually well-read empty (0)-Source notebook.
The theory of everything ecopolitical described in this paper is a conjecture that starts with a firm conviction that energy, Yangspace and Yin-bilateral time are the only prime relationships in the universe. That means that the universe is really nothing more than energy fluctuating in warped space-time creating all four fractal-forces; the electromagnetic LINE, COSINE, LTR, dopamine-guanine +,+/(+,-)0-primal-fertile force, the strong Yang +,+ WinWin force, the weak Win-Yangforce and Lose-Yin co-gravity.

When we say “the universe” that’s what we’re talking about. Even the quantum particles that seem so real to us are actually just our bi-nomial perception of energy WW-LeftBrain and WL-BiLateral-Appositional Right fluctuations and at the deepest level of reality the primary function of Yang physical form is YinYin/WinWin dipolar co-arising pregenerative-gravitational.

It is interesting to read Edouard Glissant’s “Creolization and the Making of the Americas” (2008, Creolization Quarterly) immediately after finishing Alexander Anievas’ and Kerem Nisancioglu’s “How the West Came to Rule” (2015).

You might think these two historical views of ecopolitical evolution would either have nothing to say to each other, to talk past each other’s from above/from within perspectives, or to rather vigorously argue about which is the victor in the end, WinWin
cooperative regenerative intent and constitutional purpose, Original Content’s purpose and meaning, or Capitalist Elite/NonElite Win/Lose. With NonElite creolized-enslaved also rans, before the West was supremacist, fully economic-colonialized, empowered through piracy, predative WinLose survivalist supremacy over the more WinWin PatriarchalLeft/MatriarchalRight-embryonic nurturing NonElite NonWest.

Yet, I did not find either of these to be the case. For me, reading about post-EliteRoyalist creolizing multiculturing WinWins on cooperatively expanding archipelagos of ecopolitical EarthCommons Left-Right growing commonsense of bicameral ownership and ecosystemic-economic bilaterally nutritional governance, felt like reading the Original Intent of all democratically-optimistic-Positive PolyPathic Systemic Constitutions, while reading through the jaundiced lens of the Elitist-Capitalist-Militarist WinLose-survivalist fear-mongering history of how the Patriarchal LeftBrain Dominance of Western WhiteMale Property and People Owners, felt a little bit like rereading “The Last Hurrah” of what could eventually only monoculturally become LoseLose FinalCurtain for Earth’s future as a living, as opposed to dead, ecosystem.

Glissant negatively defines creolization as not mechanical empire-building autonomy, measured in consumer-growth percentages. Rather, creolization is organic consume/produce symbiosis of WinWin ecopolitical interrelationship, characterized by evolving and revolving EliteLeft-Yang and NonEliteRight-Creolizing-affective integrative multiculturing resonance. Creolizing is Permacultural EcoPolitical Design, with Earth as one cooperatively revolving landscape for producing self-regenerative optimal polycultural climaxing diastatic co-empathic trusting WinWin outcomes.

Glissant moves on from where the “How the West was WinLose-Survivalist Won” toward how this Earth might become WinWin-Regenerativist climate and landscape health sustained. “…the obligation to remake oneself [ecopolitically] every time” is a perpetual revolutionarily diastolic constitutional intent, requiring an interdependent multiculturing capacity of trans-generational nutritional-environmental RightBrain decompositional, bilateral appositional Elite/NonElite re-integration, reweaving internal/external ecopolitical WinWin LeftBrain ego/eco-creolization.

And yet, before we march through too many piles of triumphalistic WinWin regenerative ecopolitical biographies, histories of cultures emerging WinWin systems to also submerge WinLose dysfunctionally unwinding systems, it feels prudent to recall Dr. Jane Anna Gordon’s “tragic mulatta” matriarchal NonElite-suppressed tradition. Primarily brown-skin multiculturally identified, consuming and producing RightBrain inductive chaos and dissonant disorder, tragically culminating in LoseLose suicide, and culminating in LoseLose holocaust of genocide, holonic-caustic claustrophobic ecological-aborting inevitability of Mother Earth’s empty notebooks, LoserMatriarch mulatta, reading LoseLose DoubleBinding (0)-Source PreGenesis; non-biographically self-unmeasuring creole face of Elite Revolutionary CoArising NonDual WestEast How Earth’s Climate Health is WonWon, redundantly like all that stack of journals filling my self/other ego/eco Yang/Yin Left/Right West/East-regenerating WinWin-refractive—WinLose notnot-creole-reflective ecosystemic Fullerian-Eulerian-Bayesian spacetime prime relational (0)-Source PolyPathic Health and WellBeing Theory of Every EcoPolitical CoRevolutionary EcoSystem bookcase.

The next step emerges from the realization that this WinWin ecopolitical cooperative conservation of fractal-thermodynamic regeneracy constrains the YangYin revolution of the universe on all space-time scales.

The resulting Win-regenerative as Lose-degenerative ecopolitical theory provides explanations for dark energy and dark matter as dark-temporally reversed antipathic relationship, particle as Eulerian prime-functional interdependence of spacetime equivalence, as dipolar appositional-systemically functional mass, the quantum frequency characteristics of particles, and the evolution of the universe including its WinWin beginning and possible WinLose survivalist modeled end with bilateral one-dimensional (0)-Sum game theory, supersymmetric polypathic ‘mirror-holonic’ particles, an inflaton-fYang and/or a graviton-fYin equi-valent thermodynamic ecosystemic balance toward fractal-fusing (0)-Core regenerativity [also see Buckminster Fuller, on synergy as creolizing cooperative fractal-climate normative geopolitical DNA-health and RNA-dynamic-strictured wellbeing, including integrative democratization as co-empathic ElitePlanA-NonElitePlanB revolutionary trust].

Uncategorized

Answers Without Questions

Why do answers end with answers
while questions seem to begin with yet more questions?

As a case in point…

How are the Case Studies of economic and political history
different than Einstein’s Thought Experiments?

Wait a minute…

Yes, well that’s not really a difference, I think.
Thought Experiments and Case Study expositions
both begin with waiting a minute to notice cause-effect narrative,
to decompose relationships between systemically dynamic parts.
Imagining in reverse time,
from now as cause
back toward effects
leading up to this current cause,
this current noticing,
this sometimes chaotic and unsettling waiting a minute
to notice what I am struggling with.

Why does this Case of dynamic thought exposition
feel like my important,
yet complex,
systemically dense and intricate,
hopefully even richly resonant,
question to ask,
within all the vast universe of questions
I could be investing in right now with you,
instead?

That’s more or less, probably more,
what I was trying to point out
before you interrupted me.
Isn’t our dialogical rule
also our Golden Rule?
We see richer, more fertile and optimal, outcomes,
responses to our internal Thought Experiment questions,
including our familial Dysfunctional Case Studies,
and our ecopolitical Conserve v Progress Democratic Health and Safety Case Studies,
when we begin by asking how our appositionals are somehow the same.

OK, fine.
And sorry for cutting in
when I meant to be cutting with.

Sometimes you are so fundamentalist,
so Either the Same Or Different.
By now, dearest ConservativeRight,
I would have more patiently hoped
When I ask how things are different
I really both mean to look at how they are the same and different.
So, how are Healthy Thought Experiments and Fertile Case Studies
the same?

I think we just agreed they both begin with noticing nutritional elements
and decomposing reverse effect back through potentially complex causal networks
of cooperative opportunity.

Yes, but Einstein’s Thought Experiments were metaphysical,
mathematics and unnatural science,
while Case Studies are more like watching Physical SpaceTime Reality Shows,
and Economic and Political Disaster LoseLose Devolutionary Games.

How did I know that you would respond to your own question,
about how ecological thought systems are the same,
with how they are different?

Sorry, honey,
seems to be an inductive RightBrain neglect of mine.
But, do you agree or disagree,
or both, somehow,
that Einstein’s Experiments were about metaphysical spacetime operations
while Historical Case Study Operas
are about saying and singing and dancing
actual physical and natural,
maybe even spiritual..
Wait, no, that would be over in the Metaphysics Department.

Yeah, probably better to stick to the natural realities of Earth
spawning ecological systems and cooperative thought networks.

Another difference
Einstein hoped his Thought Experiments would lead to True,
and therefore not also False,
Either/Or mathematical statements about time and energy
and the speed of light’s travel
across and through evolving and revolving appositional space.

But, when you write your Dysfunctional Extended Family Case Studies,
you couldn’t realistically hope your appositional Elite/NonElite narrative
would lead to regeneratively True,
and therefore not degeneratively False,
ecological systemic statements
about LeftEgo’s Dominating sense of time
as both positive and unfortunately too often negative-degenerating energy
and (0)-sum speed of BiLateral EnLightenment travel
across and through evolving
and revolving
regenerative health and safety space stories.

Really! Whyever not?

Because that would be confusing a LeftBrain Either-Or metaphysical thought experiment
with its appositional
NotThisEgoForm-NotThatEcoSystemic temporal-neural cooperative-nurturingflow function,
Both/And RightBrain (0)-Source
WinWin
Integral-ReGenerativity Embryonic DNA/RNA-Hypothesis.

If you say so,
but it all sounds LeftElite complex
and merely RightNonElite chaotic,
(0)-sum equivalent pay,
but still Business As CaseStudy DysFunctional WinLose,
to me.

Sorry love.
Don’t shut me down.
Just doing my LeftBrain Either/Or job.
Either Win deductive truth
Or Lose inductive notnot appositional-integrity flow.

Why is it that your EgoWin perspective
always gets the shorter definition,
while you stumble all over my WinWin NotNot way
to come up with some longer way of noticing
my nutritionally elegant nurturing Elder-ecological
health and safety lovely bilateral ways?

It’s the convex spatial Yang in EgoMe.
But, you know how I’m only at my EgoRegenerative best
when totally immersed in your BothAnd WinWin
bilaterally concave
YinYin lovely Feeling Experience
acting out ecosystemic TruthFunctional Case Studies
for BiCameral PolyPathic Love Stories.

Well, when you put it that way
you come across as less of a WinLose dominating ass,
degenerative hack writer of LeftBrain survival of the fittest;
more regenerative BothAnd RightBrain balancing thrival
of our +100%Space = (-,-) Empty-Zero fit-in-ingest integrity.

Maybe Einstein’s LeftBrain dominant
EitherSpace or Time Experiments
are metaphysically different
yet RightBrain ecologically WinWin ReGenerative/DeGenerative (0)-Soul
ecosystemic-appositional,
bilateral nondual co-arising resonant.

You’re doing it again.
That thing where you are LeftBrain explicating
while I remain RightBrain bilaterally inductive feeling-integral implicated
to somehow not really quite deductively exist
outside of timeless now.

Well, you just did the same thing.

That’s only because you have a monopoly on reductive temporal language development.

Sorry, babe,
but what else can I bicamerally do?
You smell and taste and feel just as nutritious and nurturing.

And sometimes pathological and toxic
thanks to your LeftBrain domination of ecopolitical history,
your infrequen health-nurturing matriarchal cooperative creation stories
are too often drowned out by your distorted YangEgo Space struggles against,
rather than with,
my YinYin WinWin sense of ecosystemic well-being timed Feeling Experience.

Are you feeling nutritional integrity progressive-suppressed again?

I am prevolutionarily near-diastatic,
just as you ConservativeElitist hope not.

How about if I deductively meet you half way?
Both oppositionally different
and appositionally evolving toward integrative
inductive
co-relational confluence narratives?

Now that could produce some Tipping point
conserveRight-progressLeft climate ecstatic fireworks!

You’re just teasing me, aren’t you?
This has all just been foreplay for inductive you,
to get me all WinWin bicamerally polypathic hot.
I feel so used.

Don’t pretend your co-investment in our regenerative health
and progressing future through EarthTribe babies
doesn’t like it.

Could you talk a little dirtier,
and leave out the kids part?

You mean Earthier,
deductive-inductive nurturing co-relational climaxes of nutrition,
followed not by post-revolutionary Elite/NonElite bickering,
but thriving future regenerations of optimally fertile healthywealth.

Is this a bicameral Thought Experiment we’re having
or a bilateral Case Study about regenerative appositionals
of convex EgoSpace
with concave bilateral EarthTime dialogical syntax?

Yes, baby,
bilaterally different later
if noticing our WinWin bicameral possibilities now.

Ummm.
That sounds like you’re ready
to stop noticing
and start our healthy orthopraxis?

Baby, you’re the Thought Experiment writer;
I’ve always been your LoveCase Study
of and for and through and by
SpaceTime’s co-arising nonduality.

Uncategorized

Original Intent of PostRevolutionary Constitutions

The ugly head of the Original Intent issue
co-arises with what were our ForeFather Patriarchal Patriots
thinking and feeling to leave out prohibitions against antiChristian degeneracy,
and to put in permissions for antiChristian degeneracy.

No.
Wait.
That’s not right.
We could not have inherited EnlightenmentEra Democracy’s Constitutional Law to intentionally include permissions for antiChristian degeneracy.

What about slavery and addiction and sexual impurities and perversions and abortion and prostitution?

Well, they weren’t necessarily understood as antiChristian degeneracy at the time,
although not necessarily proChristian regeneracy either.
These were personal and family issues, primarily among the proletariat, preferably.
NonElite domestics and small farmer-gardeners, hardy outdoors men, and their faithful wife-matriarchs of quiet integral embryonic Wisdom Councils over the back fence
about what the crazy Old White Men of theirs were up to now
with their post-revolutionary enlightenment
full-of-their cooperatively invested ecopolitically regenerative-positive selves;
making USA Beloved SacredCommunity babies.

Here we stand once again in the Supreme Court of US History,
to reconsider our Holy Constitutional Scripture’s Original Intent.

Once again
we will not be surprised that Fundamentalist Conservatives
will read the voice of the Strict Stern Patriarchal WinLose
LeftBrain Dominant EgoIdentified Capitalist,
while Radical Progressives read the Original voice of Lady Liberty
and all her post-revolutionary unwashed proletariat
multiculturing
raggedy
nonWhite poor refugees from alien threats
to domestic health and safety
are our Uniting States opportunity to integrate regenerative treats
for both domestic and global health and safety.

Original Intent view of Constitutional Law
depends on whether you stop at the RedState LeftBrain competitively dominant lens,
or move one step deeper
into Blue/Red BiCameral NotNot RightBrain
cooperating your bifocal health/wealth maturation.

Those words, “Fundamentalist-Red” and “Radical-Blue”/Green Aqua UltraViolet Crystal-Fractal Octave (0) dipolar coarising echo-strings of history’s matriarchal ecofeminist Original Intent Herstory/UnderStory
of GaiaEarth nature-spirit nondualisms
West/East
Ego/Eco
Left/Right DiPolar CoProductive
Secular/SacredElder ReGenerativity
Patriarchal Strength /Matriarchal Flow
Yang/Yin
Fire/Water
Earth/Climate-EcoLandscape
West/East
Ego/Eco dominant/colonized-commodified…

FundamentalistLeft Dominant and RadicalRight Repressed,
are ecologically complex,
dense with polypathic dipolar co-arising health-wealth integrity,
and nutritious Original Intent Opportunity for Mutually Assured WinWin Thrival
or WinLose Assured Destruction.

Original Constitutional Ecological Intent of ReGenerative Health,
USA, as cooperatively elsewhere,
for mutual well-being,
post-revolutionary constituted regenerative health-cooperative progress
toward global-interdependent wealth safety, contentment.

Radical PositivePositive WinWin-Only Yang-Matriarchal/Patriarchal EquiValence,
where Yang is US ConservativeRed Patriotic Original Intent,
with Yin’s Progressing Blue/Green climate integrating,
reweaving,
decomposing of ecological gaps and fissions in-between Patriarchal EitherOr Original Intent,
appositional space of silence and absence of therapeutic purpose within our Original not-quite-Holistic-Constitutional EcoPolitical Intent.

How could it be more LeftBrain health and safety Original Intent
to speak primarily to fellow WinWin cooperative Fundamentalist Conservative
CoInvestors in Continental Fertility and Longevity
and to Radical Libertarian Early EcoFeminist EarthEnlightenment nondualists,
reweaving natural and spiritual ecologically healthy nurturing dynamics,
suspiciously and strangely fascinated,
in this PostRevolutionary Enlightenment Moment of Planning and Designing Constitutionally Democratic-Organic Law
with and of and for new hybrid multiculturalism of SocialSecular-Moral Contract Faith
in cooperativity of ego/ecopolitical, nature-ElderSacred, evolution
over egocentric too-Yang overshoot not-sustainable continuing pre-revolutionary antipathic feelings of elitist-entitlement mistrust,
but here-in Western WhiteMale Patriarchal Christians as gun-rights citizens,
while all else were Originally Intended to cooperate with their Constitutional CoOperating Intent, without rights to vote
or have guns, for that matter.

Who wrote the U.S. Constitution
and who wrote the Bible?
When and why?
Who was the author(s) primary enforce-and-regenerate audience,
also with health and safety Original Intent,
and not-so-much degenerative-pre-revolutionary colonized
and owned
and commodified
and abused and neglected by aristocratic bourgeois royalist plutocratic WinLose LeftBrain Dominating Natural-Moral Law Original Intent.

What is the Constitutional post-revolutionary problem
and/or opportunity
that multiculturally and bicamerally motivated
this particular Humanely-Divinely Inspired Constitutional Scripture
at this time of both Exodus from Plutocratic-Elitist-Supremacist-Patriarchal Rule
and ReGenesis toward PostRevolutionary Enlightenment?
Economic Cooperative Health as also Politically Enlightened Interdependent Wealth,
hybrid historical-cultural Original Intent Frame
of and for ReGenerative Constitutional Health/Wealth Intent.

What is primal Original Intent purpose of any sustainable ecopolitical languaged and self-conscious memory system,
Constitution?
HumaneDeductive LanguagedLeft
equivalent with DivineSacred Ecological-Yintegrity
PolyPathic Trust/Distrust Right,

ReGenerative/DeGenerative
West = East(East) nondual double-bind notnot
BiLateral BeLoved Vertical/Horizontal
wave-linear
spiraling octaves of full-chromatic
ergodic
fertile
healthy deep matriarchal EcoBiLateral WellBecoming.

Uncategorized

Health Policies for Cooperative Action

This is for better as healthier, more regenerative, economic and political health advocates. We begin with a request for proposals from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with a March 23, 2017 deadline.

Policies for Action: Policy and Law Research to Build a Culture of Health

2017 Call for Proposals

Release Date: January 23, 2017

Purpose

Policies for Action: Policy and Law Research to Build a Culture of Health (P4A) was created to help build the evidence base for policies that can help build a Culture of Health. P4A seeks to engage long-standing health care, mental and behavioral health, and public health researchers, as well as experts in areas that we recognize have strong influence on health, well-being and equity—such as labor, criminal justice, education, transportation, housing, and the built environment.The research funded under this call for proposals (CFP) should help fill significant gaps in our knowledge about what policies can serve as positive drivers of change, including how the social determinants of health can be used to achieve improvements in population health, well-being, and equity. Additional information on this program can be found at policiesforaction.org.

With that, or some other health-regenerative, rather than pathology-degenerative, Purpose in mind, here is an excerpt from George Lakoff’s “The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to your Brain and its Politics” but including my own private/public health-related ‘both-and’ notations in brackets, which I hope will not be too distracting to be useful:

How the Rational [WinLose Competitive LeftBrain Dominant] Actor Model Contradicts Real [Left/Right Bicameral] Reason

This is a book about real [bicameral re-centering] reason–what the cognitive sciences have discovered about how we really [regeneratively-positive and degeneratively-negative] think [and feel]. So far we have seen that we think in terms of [evolving WinWin nutritional] frames, [regenerative/degenerative] narratives, [ecological-nurturing flow-trend] metaphors, [multicultural] metonymies, and [choice-tree WinWin patriarchal/matriarchal Left/RightBrain] prototypes. The rational actor model is itself defined by metaphors, and its stylized [ego/eco-bilateral structural] facts [with inductive trust, mistrust, distrust feelings] are defined by [landscape of organic network, reverse-hierarchical, WinWin choicemaking-tree bilateral] frames. But [organic ecological network] frame-based and [creolization, Jane Anna Gordon] metaphorical [WinWin] thought are largely [inductive-nonlanguaged RightBrain] unconscious and reflexive, while the calculative thought of the rational actor model is [deductive-languaged LeftBrain dominant] conscious and [bilaterally, bicamerally, binomially co-arising] reflective. If you limit what you mean by ‘reason’ to [deductive-only] conscious reflective thought, you might very well be led to believe that the rational [positive-affective co-empathic] actor model [co-facilitative regenerative-reiterative mentor], or something [positive-regenerative WinWin ecopolitical] like it, might define [bicameral] rationality. That is, you might see such a [WinWin Gaming WisdomCouncil] model as defining the rational [bilateral thought/feeling] structure of [empathically trusted health v pathology] reality as well as human [metric-algorithmic-ecological] rationality–allowing human [bicameral] beings to fit their [LeftBrain EgoCentering] reason to the [RightBrain EcoFlow Inductive Feeling] rationality of the [ecopolitically nutritious] world and hence survive [Left WinLose assumption] and thrive [Right WinWin polypathic health-regenerate trust].

…The [bicameral] rational actor model is a [polypathic discernment and dialogue, communication] product of real [health-wealth optimization] reason. But the [WinWin Gaming Patriarchal/Matriarchal Network] model itself makes the inherent claim that [organic] reason does not involve either [mechanistic] metaphors or [merely metric and abstractly languaged] frames. It therefore cannot [not] be a[n ecological] model of real [interdependent WinWin] human [cooperative-dominant rather than competitive] reason. And moreover, when we study the [political health as economic wealth] metaphors, [eco-network gaming] frames, and what [regeneratively/degeneratively] follows from them, we can see the limitations and possible dangers [of LeftBrain Deductive Enculturation Dominance], as well as the [health-optimization, cooperative thrival outcome] benefits, of applying such [ecologically bicameral nutritional-regenerative as also ecopolitical empowerment/disempowerment health] models [of and for WinWin EarthCentered internal and external climates and landscapes of regenerative health, and not so much LeftBrain Dominant degenerating WinLose pathology].

pp. 220-221, Penguin

If anyone else out there sees bicameral health-wealth wisdom investing in our shared cooperative WinWin Ego/EcoLogical regenerative-positive/degenerative-negative trend analysis, leading to large-scale Both-And, rather than Either-Or, matriarchal (reverse-patriarchal mutual subsidiarity of nutritional flow-empowerment) choice-developing cooperative health-rooted decision trees, as you explore your own interior psyches, and your discussions with family and friends and aliens and other surprising and curious mixtures of health and safety defensive-progressive ambivalence, maybe we should try to bring this WinWin WisdomCouncil to global ecopolitical cooperative scale, for everyone’s current and future health and safety.

Gerald Dillenbeck MPA, M.Div. EcoPolitical CoOperative Health-Wealth GameSystem Designer, as are we all, at least biologically speaking

http://www.gdill52.com

Uncategorized

Nutritious as a Gaming Tree

I know I will never see
or hear or taste or smell or feel
anything more nutritious than a WinWin Gaming Tree,
unfolding across all four seasons
of healthy wealth regenerations.

Imagine incubating seeded subjects
in an interdependent networked sentence
begin in winterish LeftBrain hibernation,
genesis toward cooperative nurtured objectives
captured maturely-best through WinWin summers
of regenerative health-secular
and wealth-sacred
climax,
a full-octave leaved and breathing
root nutritionally systemic
polypathically flowing
diastatic Earth Tree,
RNA square-dancing namaste
with Sun’s warm Commons-squared light.

Verbs are Springing trees for interdependent action,
while adjectives and adverbs are the tools of decomposing Autumn,
deductive-inductive selecting comparative strengths and weaknesses,
healths and pathologies,
empowerment and disempowerments,
nurturing trusts
and neglecting mistrusts
and abusive-aggressive interior discontinuous-appositional dipolar networks
of cancerous WinLose LeftBrain Yang-Dominant distrust,
within each full WinWin development tree opportunity/decompositional loss,
harvesting ecological DNA seeds of self/other thrival,
humming with Patriarchal Thymine/not-not Matriarchal Cytosine
regenerate memory moments,
DNA/RNA SolidaritySentences,
TaoTrees
of WinWin organic networking regenerativity/degenerativity.

“I would like to speak and listen with you,
our lovely healthy WinWin Tree.”
My Winter’s Warming cause
regenerates nurturing seeds of nutritional communicating root systems
with your most WinWin full-nurturing maturing You,
holonic humane Ego’s WinWin bicameral CoMentoring Tree,
our secular hope for warm fertile summerish thoughts
and shared sacred matriarchal-embryonic faith
in co-empathic nutritional health
(secular-LeftBrain)
and sensory eco-redemptive wealth
(sacred-Elder RightBrain)
bilaterally balancing full-four seasoned
WinWin Trees of trusting sensory-nutritional reason.

I polypathically think
and bicamerally feel
I shall never speak and listen
with full-octaved diastatic beauty
of our WinWin EcoPolitical
OrganicGaming
PermaCulturing NetworkTree,
measuring regenerative health of Earth’s climates,
Ego-internal and Eco-Other external,
across all four nurturing secular Flow
and sacred Karmic Graced Seasons
of Self/Other Golden Tree of Life regenerating
evolving
revolving
reweaving Left/Right economic and political
bicameral reasons
for slow-growing further deep ecological root-nurturing ecosystems
sentences
paradigms
thoughts with feelings
organic bilateral,
Spring-inductive root and Autumn-deductive branch,
WinWin networking,
and wondrously lovely,
Trees.

Uncategorized

EcoPassionate Pillow Talk

Here’s my problem, dear Yang.
It sounds good and healthy and right to me
that your Cooperate-ReGenerate (0)-Core ReProductive Theorems
are how we most fertile play our WinWin Game,
but…

Good.
Did you also hear me,
dearest Yin,
that Competing-DeGenerate +1/(-)0,
Win some Lose some Devolutionary Theorems
of AntiClimatic Dissonance
(both secular and sacred)
are how we too competitively wage LoseLose,
both anticonserving Yang Patriarchal Egos
and antiprogressing Yin RightBrain Matriarchal Suppression.

Maybe.
It’s hard for me to look at such ugly oppressive neglect
of healthier climate opportunities
of and from your Yang-Hubris.

Well, I’m not saying I’m thinking this is a good and healthy thing
with long-term health and safety outcomes
for our co-arising nondual EarthTribe!

Yes, I know.
But couldn’t you just once
remind me of how much you love to say
more positively
only YangEgo Win with Yin FourSeason EarthFlow Win
is our co-arising way to best regeneratively spin?
That sounds so much nicer,
more inviting,
more transparently transcultural.

Sure thing, my polypathic Love.
So, are you busy?
Have time for a hot eco-political,
bicameral,
cooperative tango?

Yes,
but you had me at ‘hot’.

Uncategorized

Feminist EcoPolitics Greets The Donald

Where do we think all this economic and politically empowering
cooperative
nutritional
organically luscious imagination
and ecologically exegetical orthopraxis
started?

George Lakoff speaks of strictly straight stern paternalistic God the Universalist Fathers,
vertically Winning over an otherwise Loser, yet highly competitive, ecopolitical world
and ecologically survivalist-separatist
human parasite-divine supremacist
nature-spirit dualist Western-Dominant straight-way
of seeing our origins
and ourselves,
or at least our father-figures,
ForeFathers,
ProGenitors of victorious Yang-Health Win/Lose
Left over RightBrain WinWin Dominant enculturation.

OK,
I may have added a few gaming elements,
paradigmatic essences which Lakoff
speaks of as if they may be associated with some other economically and politically normative and important words like
healthy v pathological climate,
spirit,
natural chemistry,
dynamic,
changing yet traditional ecological networking relationships.

In describing what I call LeftBrain ecopolitical Dominance,
and he describes as patriarchal straight-stern Father Knows Healthy Competitive Best 1950’s Republicanism,
“Absolute categorization requires essences,
properties that define absolute categories.”
Patriarchs tend to be Win/Lose Universalists,
as nurturing Matriarchs therapeutically trend toward WinWin Unitarian-Integrationists,
polycultural nondual co-arising nature-spirit enrichment
over monocultural BadBoy too-competitive ecopolitics.

Strict Father evolutionary ecopolitical models,
also LeftBrain Enculturation-Language Dominant,
are more drawn to spiritual fundamentalist belief systems
while their Nurturing Matriarchal Networking RightBrain
looks toward root systems of natural-radical regenerative fertility,
requiring some fortunate/unfortunate ambiguity about the nature-spirit compete/cooperate essences
of ecopolitical gender categories.

RightBrain radical spiritual experiences may be suppressed,
but MotherEarth’s cooperative regenesis is not yet dead.

Because of my own Strict Father evangelical Christian Republican,
post-adolescent USA formative years,
I have a renewing appreciation for growing up damaged,
but still RightBrain basically healthy-balancing,
in an ecopolitical LeftBrain Patriarchal EgoDominant conservationist Republican-agrarian
and yet healthy nature-spirit Matriarchal understory family,
where I was part of the dominant
Whites-Only
monoculturing
separatist rural Michigan culture,
and also secretly queer as a two-dollar bill,
as we used to say
back in the anti-feminist day.

This combination eventually led me away from Fundamentally-Dualist God the Condemning Father
toward the Radical-NonDualist Goddess the Nurturing Nature-Spirit
LeftEgo-Right ElderSacred EcoPolitical Wisdom Literature
of Taoism,
and Universal-Unitarianism,
where the hyphen itself
tells the entire permacultural history
between pre-millennial Tao as (0)-sum balancing ecopolitical SpaceTime
spoken in bilateral dialects of Patriarch/Matriarch Yang/Yin CoOperative Enthymematic Communication,
to fill in my nondual natural-spiritual matriarchal feminist side,
which is much more fun
and a whole lot wiser
than without.

From this still-maturing vantage
I can see
that we can all bicamerally see
that ecopolitical-ecological fusion is to regenerative complexity (M. Csikszentmilhalyi)
as cooperative-comparative ecopolitical blurring is to chaos theory,
or Creolizing Political Theory, in Jane Anna Gordon’s vocabulary,
or Feminist EcoPolitical Theory.

Here I enjoy a more cooperative networking and balancing culture
of extended polypathic bicameral family values,
while still aesthetically appreciating Patriarchal Forms
of CoMessianic Nurturing Daddies
as also Bodhisattva Matriarchal MercyWarriors of Peace and Climate Justice,
at their nurturing wise Solomonic best,
where we all began,
in RightMind ecopolitical prodigal potential Mommy’s Wombs,
living within Sacred MotherEarth’s climate
of Beloved CoOperative Left/Right contenting Health;
anonymous pre-embryonic Taoists.

LeftBrain ecopolitical and familial dominance
is more deeply etched in ‘nonEastern’ languaged
and nonverbally communicating/dissonating cultures,

(I dare not speak the LeftBrain WesternCapitalist Patriarchal Name
of strict means straight and stern Calvinist truth
more than also spiraling,
thermodynamically balancing,
double-binding fractal (0)-sum polypathic octave frequencies
of enlightnment,
CoOperative Nature’s Divinely Sacred Symmetric BiLateral Beauty)

Both verbally and nonverbally,
both familially and extended socially,
both economically and extended politically invested,
both competitively and cooperatively,
both authoritatively regenerative and nurturing-health responsibly,
it seems to me
these are the appositional polarities
around which each of our economic and political narratives
find their most nutritiously enlightening root systems
of ecological climate health as ego/eco-centric wealth.

The Donald looks more like the Court Jester
than the Court Messiah.
Unfortunately,
now the BadBoy logical conclusion
of LeftBrain Dominant USA adolescently competitive ecopolitics
has even more power of the purse
and the nuclear ballistics.
It’s like letting your kids
play with fire
while using your money for fuel.
It just doesn’t feel healthy
or like wise wealth investment planning
to me;
more kind of LeftBrain Dominatrix-Delusional terrifying.

Uncategorized

PolyPathic Political Populace

In another millennial time and Chinese/Russian place,
Taoism began as aphorisms and poetry
about political philosophy,
articulating a bicameral tension
between Conservative Yangers,
patriarchal universalist ego empire builders,
and Unitarian Progressive Yinners, WinWinners,
a matriarchal cooperative
polypathic
multicultural
integrative network of nurturers,
(the longer the list of adjectives and adverbs,
the less important history would prove us to become cooperatively disintegrated)
empty of any sectarian-deductive labeling,
and supremacist framing, function.

Hence, everyone knows the principles of InterdependentYang and EmptyYin,
and usually metaphorically associate them with Male and Female,
and Positive and Negative,
yet few have economically and/or politically defined
the governing power of Tao.
We have the Tao of most everything,
without necessarily being clear about what the label Tao
adds to most anything.

In another millennial time and New England and Baltimore place,
Reverend Channing proposed to replace the Holy Trinity
with God the LeftBrain Dominant patriarchal EgoFather[Mother],
with universalist regenerative credentials of deduced historic effectiveness,
and the RightBrain Unitarian matriarchal OverSoul
of Grace
and Flow
and Karma
and Princess (0)-Sum Prime Relational Energy
of ecoconscious integrative potential,
all four nondual sisters co-arising cooperatively together
in ecopolitical health
and bicameral safety Paradise
of DNA with RNA Solidarity in fractal-nutritional seasons
with reasons of regenerative health,
Original Tao Intent.

Or, something LeftBrain Universal God
and RightBrain OverSoul EcoConscious Unitarian
like Yang Ego discontinuous competitions
with Yintegral EcoIntegrity CoOperative Networking
and WinLose evolutionary model of mutual degeneration
with WinWin ecological model of regenerativity.

It is this Unitarian 0-sum RightBrainBody OverSoul
that Reverend Julian Jaynes explores
as how we are prodigal son and daughter and transgender Egos,
and OverSoul Atman PolyPaths of EcoConsciousness,
Prodigal Unitarians
progressing Ego health and safety Conservationism,
played WinWin with LeftBrain ego-centric
ecological discernment of optimally cooperative evolution
rather than BusinessAsUsual LeftBrain idolatry
of competitive capitalistic revolutions,
and concomitant WinLose violence
in the name of peacemaking,
and pathological lack of long-term consciousness
in the name of climates and landscapes of and for healthy freedom,
optimally self-liberating safety,
nurturance,
regenerativity,
polypathic integrity.

“…[T]here is something else to be observed
as you study your own [prodigal bicameral] nature.
It is a something of supreme importance….
Suppose you observe [several of ego-you] in your daily consciousness,
now one,
now the other
asserting itself in thought and behavior;
who is it,
let us ask,
who is it
or what is it
that does the observing?”

Polypathic ecoconsciousness
of time’s flow,
regenerative and too often chaotically Left-Right dissonant.

“Are you not conscious of still another [Elder RightBrain] self,
larger and more inclusive than the others,
that seems to be standing outside watching them,
counting them,
criticizing them,
applauding them?”

OverSoul,
Atman,
holonic matriarchally cooperative face
of Father Patriarch LeftBrain.
Brahma is Tao of Gaia.

“Who is it that wonders?”

Which God and/or Goddess do you most idolize
as RightBrain BiCameral OverSoul?

“There are times when you fall so completely into the possession of one of these smaller selves [Ego-ideals],
that you lose all consciousness of the one [Earth-Matriarchal ReGenerator] watching outside.
It is only afterward that the presence of the [Gaia-Climate OverSoul] watcher
is seen and felt.
There are other times
when the [ecoconscious] watcher
seems to be on the guard [silent defensive-dissonant-repressed] all the time,
and while the lesser personalities [LeftBrain Dominant ego-idols] are having their way,
is continually sounding the word of [condemning patriarchal] rebuke
or [matriarchal health and safety nurturing] encouragement….
You may call it [prodigal] conscience,
or moral [polypathic] sentiment–
anything you please.
I like to give it the name I have already used
and call it the real
or the larger [OverSoul, RightBrain EmBodied NonDual CoArising] self.”

A rational matriarchal Gaia theistic belief
in an Original ReGenerative Source
could be both theologically universalist
with regard to root source of divine intelligent ecopolitical empowerment,
and teleologically secular-unitarian
with regard to evolutionary Omega Point
of humane polypathic healthy,
wealthy,
and rationally co-mentoring abundance.

Both history and science,
our own eyes and ears,
remind us phylogeny is polypathic
across both DNA and RNA branches
of our regenerative tree of life.

So it is our Earth’s systemic ecology is polyculturally progressing
across all economic/political nutritionally positive/positronic relationships.

In this post-millennial time in Gaia’s growing climate pathology,
Tao means Conserve/Progress ecopolitical healthy climates
of positive cooperative regenerativity,
resonantly inside as reiteratively outside,
below as above
before Space as after Time
positive as double-binding negative
Yang as YinYin
WinWin (0)-sum PolyPathic Prodigality.

Rev. Julian Jaynes quotes are from his “Coming to One’s Self” homily, published in Magic Wells: Sermons…, 1922. As noted in prior pieces, I read Reverend Jaynes’s theology through his psychologist son, Julian Jaynes, who wrote a seminal evolutionary theory of bicameral consciousness development, very much in synchronicity with Gregory Bateson’s concept of Sacred Ecology.

Uncategorized

Avatar of ReGenerative Time

If God is First Universal Cause,
then Goddess EarthYin is also Last regenerative-synergetic Effect
and Affecting BiCameral-Discerning Earth and Ego’s Climate Health

[WinWin cooperative-reiterative double-bind-binary Bayesian QByte informational/exformational co-arising systemic polynomial balance trends],

like DNA 4D Yang/Yin Thymine/Cytosine thermodynamic infusing balance,
transubstantiating multiculturing RNA,
and their 4D equivalent fractal double-binding squared speed of starlight
BiLateral Temporal CoArising Source,
each fertilely optimizing equivalent octave-meme frequencies
of co-arising nondual ReGenerative Psychology
as Positive OVER Negative notnot EcoLogical
First Left Cause (0) Not-Not optimally lasting Pubic Health and Safety,
Earth Righteous Effectiveness

For optimizing both polynomial nouns and polypathic relational verbs
nurturing Original Intent,
back in time to Black Hole
(0) BiLateral Core Sacred Unitive-nominative Source Convex
over
BiCameral ConCave Unitarian-dipolar notnot co-arising denominatively accessible exformation, reverse-corollary trends of
Elder RightBrain neural-sensory regenerations
are also positive-aptic health-as-wealth
are also median Tipping Point appositional (0)-ego/ecopolitical
Tao-Zen-Pythagorean? nonduality,
bicameral cooperative-evolutionary default function.

Uncategorized

Hope in GoodFlow Timing

Hope is not the positive outcome flower of spiritual faith and conviction,
says political philosopher Vaclav Havel,
nor is despair rooted in WinWin CoMessianic meaning and purpose and values,
eternal promise of future fertility
of omnipotent Yang Bodhisattva Empowering
healthy wealth,
natural-spiritual interior landscapes of abundant health
within exterior ecosystemic multiculturing,
synergetically revolving, climates.

Hope is not only rooted in spiritualized empathic trusts
bu also flowers as multicultural faith
in rationally deductive certainties
that something makes ecologically health sense;
it is WinWin economically and ecologically short-term NOW
on through long-term,
7-regenerations, and all those folks and tribes of future times.

Hope is rooted in ecological climate health v pathology,
regardless of co-arising dissonant shorter-term ecopolitical WinLose
suboptimization of health-wealth outcome opportunities.
This cognitive-affective dissonance, conflicting climates,
is to be expected
as Yang’s LeftBrain dominant resistance
to otherwise cooperatively-dominant
peacefully nurturing
evolution of ecological harvests,
consilient gatherings of regenerative nutritional sensory experience,
Yang exterior ecosystemic,
as ecopolitically, notnot interior YinYin = WinTime-SquareRoot Reiterative,
cooperative bicameral enlightenment,
reflecting visual and audio DoubleFractal-Fused OctaveFrequency wave-linear bilateral equivalence,
(0) sum economic investment Left as ecological enrichment Right,
and (0) TippingPoint dipolar co-arising soul as core nature/spirit
TaoTime wu wei balance,
within 4 spacetime primal equivalent developmental stages,
ethological dimensions of temporal fold-flow-fuseYin-unfoldYang dipolarity.
(Fuller, Euler, Thurston, Perelman, Laotse, et. al.)

Mapping LaoTse sonnets
onto iconic language choices
of political philosopher Havel,
a more syncretically nutritious outcome room
provides this 4D RealTime ecoconscious bicameral network view
as YangLeft with notnot Yang Dipolar ElderRightBrain ecological health trending balance between
nature-regenerative Left sensory (0)-sum receptor balance
moving through ElderSpirit Right’s Interdependently Fertile DNA root
ecosystemically enscribed by c-squared speed of light
primally notnot Eulerian Primal Relationship
of (0) sum and soul squared written (-/-)0-squared nihilistic
dipolar co-arising
bilaterally enlightening
notnot P = P
yin = yang
when notnot Zero-fused double-binary = +1 octave-byte.

Regardless of (0) sum timelessly eternal details,
waving off toward Pronoia instead of Paranoia
Landscapes of ecopolitical climate choices
for health v pathology,
we might all multiculturally agree?
hope is rooted in both spiritual faith
and natural ecologically deduced and replicable,
and regeneratively fertile,
ecopolitically resonant,
rationally co-invested,
positive healthy, and helpful, judgment
that cooperative also means abundantly self-regeneratively nutritional,
as opposed to too competitively LeftBrain Dominant’s not-so-much,
addicted to WinLose evolutionary and revolutionary scenarios,
where Elder Right can only ecologically celebrate
WinWin Integrity
of health ego/eco-storic ReGenerative System,
Nutritional (0) Deep Learning Enculturation.