Tag Archives: integrity

Uncategorized

Cooperative Therapy

EarthTribe lives with

by

for

as cooperative integrity,

Yin-root of Yang

compassioning filled-up mind,

metaphysical spacetime’s place,

polyculturing home.

 

EarthTribe’s chronic issue

with and from

stimulating and responding

causing and effecting

winning and losing

dialectical behavior’s therapeutic intent,

silently implied assumption

of primally inclusive Thesis.

From how far back in orthodox history

has this Prime Relationship hypothesis emerged?

Which Thesis do we prefer, and why?

 

Are we in a human race to save scarce time,

without enough for all EarthTribe,

to profusely sweat resonant resolving power

overflowing with bucket lists of diversely correct needs

and inclusive righteous wants,

our asks,

our truly organic special interests,

our WeSelf-marketing,

our egoistic self-delighted wisdom?

 

Is that who we are,

what we inherited,

how we want our  autistic kids to live in

this great transitional

charismatic

Millennialistic Tribe?

 

Or, could we belong as parasitic cooperators

mentors

prime rooted in power of equi-valent solidarity,

mutually subsidiary,

harmoniously balancing

economizing

eco-logical orthopraxis?

 

Do we have sufficient time

for gratitude,

sharing this benign EarthHost

we think of as an ecosystem,

we resolve to co-prehensilely embrace

as integrating incarnation’s multisystemic relationships,

we permaculturally plant as self-optimizing polycultures,

we learn as Deep and Wide Ecology,

we humor as eco-centric Zeroism,

wishful willing messianic redeemers,

self-inflicting wild polypathic prophets,

we compute as (0)-sum geometric crystal forms,

spirals,

revolutions,

fractals,

octaves,

waves,

quantic dancing functions and gravity’s restrained relationships,

frequencies of analogical energy

and digitized,

atomized,

double-binary,

dipolar,

binomially balancing informational development trends,

thermodynamic and electromagnet-ionic panentheism

smooth-structuring ragged chaos,

bionically speaking,

both Universal Metric  closed-field Set

and metadynamic,

openly magnanimous

CommonSystem?

 

Metaphysical Positive/Yang greets Negative/Yin

as Physical Universe’s non-polynomial timeless chaos

returns his Grand Empirical,

Polynomial Space-carnating Way.

 

EarthTribe lives cooperative integrity,

spacetime’s polyculturing EarthHome.

Each moment plant’s nutrient seeds,

yesterday’s twisting,

and hopefully tomorrow’s turning,

synchronic swimming-flying flowers.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Polyculture Asylum

She still flinches

when a hand from on high

heads too close to her head,

like an abused undomesticated bitch

with too much oppositionally heated

bipolarity for safe freedom

outside silent medicated silos,

well intended asylums

without her sense of humor.

 

How would I live without her gift

of oppositional comedy?

Where yes means no, or maybe yes

or I’m not sure I grok what you say,

but I see smiling,

gratitude for time, life

mentoring me how we look to Other,

playing oppositional synergetic noticing,

then trusting functional potential

rather than swinging hand

from up,

and back at pain,

lost hope.

 

How would I trust without total faith in her

utterly sociopathic guilelessness?

She could tell a lie,

but why would she care enough

about what you think,

about what you smell,

about what you see, or don’t see, for that matter,

or even feel,

to bother to lie to you!?

 

So, when I ask her,

“Are you more happy now,

or more sad?”

and she opens her full radiant beams

up toward my hands

and lispily adds,

“More happy…what’s that smell?”

I know she would have said the same

even without this smell

I cannot quite sense,

and hope so much is not me.

 

To grow capacity for happiness

and brief glimpses of saner kindness,

like “Make me breakfast, please!”

without even a prompt,

and then the quiet “Thank you” gravy

as I turn my back

to wash her filthy dishes,

regenerates our polyculturing

lives of solidarity,

dancing eye-to-eye.

 

He, Yin son,

without capacity to language,

throws dimples on this dancing song

telling stories he learned by heart,

in shrieks and gales and waves of

rich composting laughter,

spinning wild saliva strings,

radiant Angelman joy.

 

Old Right hemispheric dominant

icon of ecological myth,

ego zero-balanced centric identity,

son of Universal Mediums,

breathes and beats his

well-indented teething ring,

hypnotic alchemistirring wand

drenched with passionate mindfulness.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

I Believe…

I believe the political power implications of a universal eco-spirituality is an emerging cooperative economic vision revoluionarily erupting since we achieved global information networking capacity.

I believe all spiritual traditions and cultures share a primal comprehension that we do not need more knowledge to fulfill our Earth-bound paradise resolving vocation; we merely need to more deductively understand what we already intuitively prehend.

I believe economic values incarnate ecological virtues already emerging into who we are together as a global polycultural EarthTribe.

I believe that “spiritual” is a very old word for “humane nature;” so panentheistic; not independent of nature, but rather an inductive/deductive dialogue with nature. Nature and spirit are interdependent as Yang (+e-function) and Yin (-e-function). [See Euler, or B. Fuller on Euler, or David Bohm on Explicate v. Implicate temporally-unfolding strings of formative/disformative/diaformation energy]

I believe each local community and our entire global species derive from a positive meaning/purpose Original Intent [teleology; not necessarily theology] toward homophily, love, synergy, integrity, co-passionate mind/form out of which this experience emerged way far back prior to language, when life began through 4-equidimensional acid-based regenerative mutuality.

I believe a very old verb-word “Tao” for goodness, beauty, truth, equity, combined together in one fractal-integrity structure, is dynamically binomial, as YangNature/YinSpirit, which is 4-dimensionally, natural, systemic, universal articulation of grace (West) or karma (East), aka, evolution, incarnation.

I believe that this nature/spirit dialogue is fundamentally informed by the profound integrity between human nature’s DNA-coded Interior Landscape, binomial orthopraxis “mental space,” reflecting Hilbert-spacetime, system-optimizing, cognitive-regenerative natural universe Exterior Universal Landscape.

I believe the Theory of spacetime Relativity, normatively unfolds in our (0)-soul Prime Yang/Yin binomial [“binary” within digital information processing universes] Relationship toward a global politically, socially, economically, ecologically, ionically-balancing emergent Positive Teleology of Synergetic Regenerativity.

I believe this (0) soul polarity we share is Zeroism’s binomial prime fold of integrity, and that a permacultural reconnecting with this universal comprehension will also rejoin our political longing with our cultural belonging, our economic purpose with our ecological meaning, our nature with our spirit, our Yang with our Yin, our tomorrow with our today,our becoming and our Being, our function and our (in/ex)Forming-evolution in this Eternal Tao Moment.

I believe, therefore, when polynomial spacetime information becomes equivalently reverse-balanced by non-polynomial  Implicate reverse-temporal Order, then we have a Trimtab, tipping-point, global permacultural threshold moment, teaching, mentoring, reminding us of our regenerative information string back to before time, when Universal Prime Rationality was confluently functional form, in +/- thermodynamic balanced trajectory toward our re-emergent future paradise.

I believe as without, so within,

as before, so after,

as above, so below,

as stimulus, so response,

as belonging, so longing,

as meaning, so purpose,

as originally intended, so regeneratively extended,

as Yin, so Yang,

as time, so space,

as reverse-temporal-functional, so in-formed,

as Implicate reverse ordered, so Explicate Positive Teleology,

as nature, so humane spirit-nature,

as karma, so grace,

as mind, so com-passion,

as faith, so love,

as hope, so faith,

enthymeme, so hope,

TrimTab pathology-as-teacher, so positive therapy

as NP, so P

as -(-), so +,

as +binomial-temporal QBit e-function, so (+)=(-) polynomial e-function-square root (0)-CoreChi Boson.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Heart Home

Addicted to imagined warm translucent memories

of places I have never been

but might like more

than uncovering a home

right here in this space

this time,

 

This moment longs for elsewhere

this must belong to me

to be with

watch

smell

touch

taste

listen to her ripe rich resonant melody

glowing radiant days

closing peaceful soft twinkling nights.

 

This intimately pleasing home

where I should be

if time were ticking true

unfolding crested waves of gratitude

surfing full sprayed

gently sweeping back again

through seasoned blissful rhythms

pulsing in toward out,

sweaty naked summer

recedes toward winter’s covered quiet

longing for some place where

becoming loves belonging,

neighbors stretched and bowed across a backyard fence.

 

Home is where my heart would be,

a sea of deeply fathomed surface

rippling  mountainous reflecting integrity

rooted in sweet compost memory.

 

I have not belonged sufficiently

to not long for glad reunions

with people I will never meet

in places left undone.

 

Perhaps tonight I’ll fly

full purposed toward shared remembering

where home and I can sync our hearts

beating fire-lit amber rhythms

coiling up beyond soft sight

a kiss toward star night’s sparkle bright

a hope for dawn’s embrace

gracefully addicting this stretched out  incarnation

slowly radiant expanse

joins passioned mind to habitat of heart.

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Revolutionary Psalm

What ecojustice requires of each

is precisely the same,

absolute integrity.

What justice invites us toward

is absolutely unique to each incarnation.

A love of justice,

a therapeutic bath

of self and Other acceptance

for who we are

as we are.

Redemption is a come as you are party

of deep integrity and love.

 

We are a species of cooperative communisters,

intentional communicators practicing community,

administering research

creating discovery

design

developing each regenerating being

to remember our EarthTribe

mutually defined

refined

divined.

 

Integral reiterations toward Multisystemic Therapy,

Deep Creative Learning toward balanced eco-living

(with oneself as well as others)

Nonviolent Listening toward active peaceful speaking

Positively hopeful toward ecology of graced-full mind

and harmonious heart

Permacultured Living toward integrative loving.

 

Regenerate metric-ulation

back in time pressed forward,

positively evolving toward rationality

integrity

sanity.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Weeping Trees of Life

My tree of life too often weeps

willowing down toward grounded roots

sustaining all this weight of history.

 

Our tree of life grows up and down,

a tree of cultured composting ground

up through tiny reaching tendrils

laced to root-unwinding system growth,

up toward light and air and breeze

and full-bloomed flower of polyculturing praise.

 

My life tree weeps for fear of death

tear-seeds reining in my soul

winking down through fertile ground

where springs bring hope of day.

 

Not all trees are weeping trees.

We tend to grow near watered streams

flooding nutrintegritative souls

awash in tears

informed by years of self-encultured

sadness ignored by upright stretch

of stronger Yangish stuff,

with dryer roots.

 

My tree of life too often weeps

to grow up as an oak

filled willow to reach around this Earth

and dance with roots

gracefully embracing soulfilled

gravitating rhythms

of regenesis.

 

My tree of life too often weeps to grow.

Standard
Uncategorized

Positive Confluence Theorem for Optimizing Community Value Discernment

My work for the past couple of decades has veered away from group facilitation and detoured toward corporate grant and contract proposal writing, but I am struck by parallels between optimized proposal communication and community-building for wise discernment. Whether writing to public officials about policies and budgets, or to private sector philanthropists, the most effective way to open the doors of mutual communication are to show your constituency first that you understand, and share, our optimized outcome framework. If I start off advocating for a program, or a process, or a policy, or for money, then I am another “special interest lobbyist.” Not an effective way to start.
My still emerging theory about this dynamic is drawn from Positive Psychology and from Communication Theory.  Perhaps you are familiar with the Cognitive Dissonance Theorem: we tend to cognitively deflect messages that are dissonant to our salient gestalt. We just don’t build an iterative communication string off from messages that do not integrate with our existing gestalt very often. If we do start off dissonant and it works out, it is probably because of the appositional Positive Confluence Theorem [which doesn’t actually exist, except perhaps in Group Theory of Metric Structure–kind of a theoretical math thing] that we tend to consonantly resonate with messages that are intuitively synergetic with our Whole System value-gestalt. In Game Theory, this would be articulating the optimal and most inclusive Win-Win outcome accessible through compassionate, or appreciative, inquiry.
When the proposer of a choice-making process begins with where we most inclusively desire to Win-Win together, at the end of our rhetorical event [again, Communication Theory], then this establishes a broad, intentionally inclusive of both positive and negative deviance, framework. When the facilitator takes the additional step of proposing a rhetorical culture that values deviant inclusiveness and personal integrity, then this Win-Win Boundary Window begins to fill with the flow of a creative deep listening ecology. Individual monocultures in the room, or in the network, trend toward mutually nutrient-refining polycultures. We might think of this as the Permaculture Design’s Theory of Evolution. This requires design technology for iterative feedback loops that are accessible over time as  inclusively malleable communication strings. Positive-trending communication strings build communities of sustainable and inclusive discernment.
The theoretical limitation on Win-Win positive teleological culture-building, in anticipation of actually having the people in the room, or hooked up to each other on-line, is that procedural and normative values for mutual-flexibility [what Eastern cultures refer to as gratitude, and/or “namaste”] optimize when balanced with the value of personal integrity. We do not have an inclusive Win-Win positive framework for imagining long-term sustainable outcomes if we expect anyone to surrender integrity on behalf of flexibility, or flexibility on behalf of others’ integrity.
That last part, explicitly establishing a discernment culture that, in a sense, norms redemptive flexibility on behalf of others’ integrity typically, in Western cultures, falls prey to Cognitive Dissonance. We immediately get it that valuing mutual flexibility should not compromise personal integrity; we are fuzzier, with the possible exception of a feminist perspective, about the problem of valuing mutual integrity that compromises flexibility. If I yield to the Others’ need for personal integrity to the point that my flexibility is broken, then I have caved, lost. Flexibility will not tolerate the absence of mutual integrity, of establishing a relationship where we believe we have given at least as well as we have taken, and vice versa. The solution to both boundary issues may be to build an explicit discernment culture that holds the values of integrity-passion and flexibility-mindfulness in dynamic (diapraxis?) balance. This balance may be charted (I have not actually tried this), borrowing from Dynamic Facilitation, as a central vertical axis on each of four sheets:
Notice Concerns: how we are v. how we are not [shown appositionally on each side of the binary information axis]
Problems of Hope: what we think about v. what we don’t think about
Faithful ReSolutions: what we coincidentally say/create/design v. what we don’t say/create/design
Regenerative Data Harvest: what we have done v. what we have not done
The left side (bicameral-normative) is the Polynomial side; while the right side is the Non-Polynomial, or Reverse-Polynomial side, again, in information systems theory. The left side also emphasizes our collective integrity, while the right side emphasizes our collective flexibility to imagine what we might be together, but is not yet. In Taoism, the left side is the rhetorical event’s Yang trajectory, and the right side is this rhetorical event’s emergent Yin-balancing trajectory.
This emergent Positive Confluence Theorem predicts that when everyone can find themselves and each other within this holistically inclusive Win-Win Frame, we collectively begin noticing that the (0) Axials predict the most inclusively sustainable balance of both integrity and flexibility.

 

Standard