Man/Sha Legends

On the evolution of logical paradigms

Excerpted from Dr. Taowls History of Logistics Class

 

At least since early research in systems theory, as applied to natural and linguistic systems of regeneration and decay, by names such as Whitehead, Bateson, Kuhn, B. Fuller, and Bohm, a fractal-crystal development structure for optimizing diastatic integrity has emerged in a fairly long polymorphic column of logical and logos paradigms. We will spend some time looking at fractal and prime dipolar relationships in:

biology,

geology,

neurology (aptic v. synaptic),

psychology (Right v. Left hemispheric dominance),

pathology,

numerology (especially digital-binary),

geneology,

mythology,

teleology,

theology,

logic,

all rooted in human languaged and metric-sequential ecology.

 

Logos has been evolving from ecological roots toward economic branches of regenetic consumption, bearing productive breathing leaves and vocations to produce regenerative fruit, birthing by decomposing seeds, to spring up with new hope for optimal growing seasons during spring through summer.

This ecologically sprouted cooperative economy flourishes best within a richly nutritional compost environment of mutually mentoring, teaching-learning, organic eco-cells of decomposition, responding with gratitude to flirtatious root tendrils, succulent filaments looking for some actively confluent, harmonious love, or synergy.

Commodification of Earth’s regenerative nutrient-normative value system began to emerge with the adolescence of the Western-centric Industrial Age, now concluding. Until this reification of value as capital, value exchanges were primally rooted in the expectation of nutritional merit. This is particularly true if we consider nutrition as germane to all sensory receptors, not just taste and smell, but also audio-visual, and affective-feeling receptors.

Currently, and trans-millennially, we are reweaving our logos strings, coming toward comprehension that information is to energy as flowing time is to thermodynamically balancing space, as economics is to ecologic, as form follows eco-functional (life sustaining) evolution, and holonic-fractal revolutions of seasons and eras, including permaculture design and planning projects, trigonometric prime “Closed Set” functions, Bloom’s deep learning Taxonomy, theologians’ spiritual, and perhaps alchemical, four-seasons of winter’s enthymematic purgation (metta), spring’s hope (karam), summer maturation’s positive developing faith (mudita), culminating in autumn’s fruitful harvest (it was the Messiah who said “by their fruits you will know their nutritional value, or lack thereof”) , optimizing annual uppekkha outcomes by winnowing, selecting, and regenerating compost compressed with Elders’ seeds, leaves, nutrients hibernating in advent of this Great ReGenesis Transition Millennium, rediscovering Right and Left hemispheric teleological balance, as digitally and binary balanced in (-)/(-) = NotPolynomial Information = (+)Polynomial[dipolar correlate] spacetime energetic, dynamic information. Confluent information is co-incidental, as contrasted with dissonant noise, and may be defined as +ergodic/spatial metric balance equivalent (=) to (-)ionic/temporal electromagnetic balancing induction. So, a positron is coincidentally synergetic with a double-negative neutron, which atomically outlines an internal, concave, fractal-ionic elliptical wavilinear in/exforming string. But, that all heads off toward theoretical physics and Thurston and Perelman and Group Theory, which grows intentionally removed from history and her awkwardly less smooth-structured evolution.

We each have a choice as we compare paradigms. It has become urgent for thorough research to explore both sides of this choice. Not only diversities of specialized information within distinct paradigmatic frames, but also our mutually coincident confluence between and among these diverse logos-logic branches on our human linguistic left-brained Tree of Ecological Life.

As we further comprehend that it is not really a new string or new economy we seek on our globally regenerative vocation, we will more cooperatively recognize and appreciate that we all follow one permacultured ecological paradigm as it traverses the great cranial-spinal divide, originating with Elder RNA Codexed intuitive memory, then emergent Left-brain dominance, and now Trim Tabbing back toward Left-Right hemispheric dipolar balance; eco-logic resolves from theo-logosed early bicamerality (see Julian Jaynes on the ethological development of Left-brained cultural-linguistic dominance of deductive reasoning and metric calculation, as icons shifted to linguistic symbols) to spread an actively cooperative economy with an endosymbiotic understory of mutually subsidiary power-strengthening optimization strategies, bridging religion with scientific research in what Fuller termed Universal Intelligence.

Fuller’s “Intelligence” is not merely deductive and statically discerned or designed, it also has a regenerative four equivalent fractal-elliptical dimensional structure as incarnated in natural systems. This contrasts with older hard-copy two-dimensional drawings, confusing Yin-Yang closed circular symbols as sufficient for understanding real four-dimensional world economic revolving, wavilinear, double-knotted, universal Prime Relationship of space and time, unfolding, enfolding within human speciated memory, refolding; DNA and Yang’s RNA Elder ReGenetic Codex written within dynamic space and place as Whole Universal Binomial Intelligence, all the way down to QBit sub-atomic holonic Commons harmony.

Our humane permacultural vocation optimizes rich polycultural Climax Communities of inclusive and diverse information, nutrient values, organic networks, each an integral multisystemic therapeutic project to minimize stress and dissonance by optimizing our full-harmony opera.

Legend has it that this resolutionary process all culminates when the Fat Queen sings.

Hmmm….

Why are you all looking at me, I wasn’t singing out loud again was I?

Standard
Uncategorized

Polyculturing Bipolar Paths

Our passion grows planetary,

and coincidentally emergent.

 

Learning grows logical

rational

accessible to both Self and Other;

evaporates into dissonance

without coincidental incarnation,

madness and wildness.

 

EcoSelf consciousness develops

coincidental experience,

awareness,

comprehension

of our ego-eco balancing identity

as bionic information processors

of form-bits essentially binomial,

mutually mentoring bows of gratitude

implied, then explicating, emerging

elliptical convex Yang eruptions

on Earth’s evolving skin,

filled with yeasting metaphysical Yin-Codex

concavely unfolding polycultural paradigms and memes,

logos and mythos,

growing out and merging,

synergizing ego-id and Gaia’s superego,

Left and Right confluent experience,

incident, rhetorical and experiential events,

deduced coincidence optimizing intuitively positive

teleo-ecological multisystemic identity.

 

Half of Freud’s mental health

uncovered id-ego learning to resolve,

emerging resonance with Other Half of mindful well-being,

super-eco’s redeemer economics,

exchanging win-lose cognitive dissonance

for win-win ecological coincidence of lives

and mindful consciousness.

 

Meta-enculturating diastasis

optimizes Yin’s purgative ego-function,

seeding Yang’s fully balancing life-form;

where Yin is non-polynomial spacetime information

double-bound equivalent

with Yang polynomial information’s primal resolution

to always fly and swim and walk,

run and play and hide,

and mutually gravitate together.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Tao’s Coincidental Teleology

Co-incidence is binomial, bionic, binary, double-bound information, energetically measured in protons and neutrons and their quantificationic prime relationship.

Dissonance, cognitive dissonance included, is what happens when coincidention does not, is not perceived.

Time’s coincidention is equivalent to space’s content-ionic form. Functional forms of solidarity balance contentious self-strengthening within cooperative contentment of inclusive self-identity.

Permacultural dynamic shamanic (and early Taoist) comprehension of natural systemic evolution as tipping points, species, faces, spaces, forms, nomials, functional flow and force patterns, paradigms and procedures, policies and identities, language and linguistics, communities and communication strings, rhetorical events and fields are coincidental integrity of each moment’s timeless potential for diastatic balance.

In Permaculture Design and Development, we call these diastolically balancing tipping-point statuses Climax Communities; mature polycultural networks of coincidental and mutually-defining information. These tend toward inclusive regeneration of diverse nutrient cooperative economies.

Cooperative economic intent is also coincidental (dialectical) ecological therapeutic orthopraxis.

Climax Communities optimize cooperation by minimizing competitive, win-lose strategic intent, loss, suffering, dissonance, and disease, both physical and metaphysical-mental-cognitive prehension of systemic function-mentors.

Basic multisystemic attendance (what Buddhists understand as a root system toward incarnation’s compassion-mind flower) to Yang’s ego-intentions and Yin’s eco-reiterative purposes, virtues, values, purgative concave balancing praxis is Tao, ecologos, wise economics.

Unwise economic principles, policies, practices, systems, tend to produce monocultural, monopolistic, “weedy” dissonating  global outcomes.

Just as Yang and Yin physical functions follow ubiquitously coincidental (dialectical, bionic) temporal flow-functions, so too Yin is endomorphically double-negative smooth-structuring ionic temporal encoding functional, resolving RNA/DNA fractal memory structure.

Yang discovers eisegetically-held Exterior Landscape information as Yin uncovers exegetical Interior Landscape resonant functions of rhythm and frequency, flow and tipping point force/fold patterns.

Yang is left-hemisphere linguistic/languaged deductive dominant while Yin is right-hemisphere proportional-temporal-relational-affective-intuitive dominant.

Yin is to enculturing original intent as Yang is to coincidental karmic incarnation, an evolving resolution string theory confluent with Fuller’s Universal Intelligence as diastolically predicting  speciated multisystemic reorientation toward universal life’s eternity; a permacultural panentheism of EarthTribe regenesis.

Yin’s double-negative neutronic-concaving zeroism actively harmonizes equivalent reverse temporal-neural frequencies, inviting Yang’s proton-bionic, karmic-ionic convexing incarnation.

There is only coincidental integrity,

space and time’s incarnating potential

inviting

resolving

regenerating multisystemic polyculturing networks

webs

bodies

strings of culturing form and function

waving binomial frequencies

toward more contentment,

less contentiousness.

 

Form is content,

well-formed families and communities

avoid dysfunctional content

by grasping its straining stressful mentoring voice

about not only which dispassions to avoid

but also why

and where to set our polycultural pilgrimage rudder’s tipping point

sweet spot Trim Tab

to grasp when aversion overcompensates,

when avoiding karma’s grasp

would trend toward our dis-grace.

 

Avoid competitive grasping

by grasping cooperative aversions to loss and dissonance.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Basic Multisystemic Compassion

As I approached David Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order I anticipated easy resonance with his philosophy, but was concerned I would be lost in his symbolic math. I had no idea that he had any interest in language or anything that might approach a meta-philosophy of linguistics.

I probably don’t understand enough of this to even successfully explain why it feels so compelling to me, much less why I hope it will be compelling to you. Even so, let me set the stage for his rheomode chapter with a few sentences that grabbed me.

 

…in the present inquiry the rheomode will be concerned mainly with questions having to do with the broad and deep implications of our overall world views which now tend to be raised largely in the study of philosophy, psychology, art, science and mathematics, but especially in the study of thought and language themselves…. …the dominant form of subject-verb-object tends continually to lead to fragmentation, and it is evident that the attempt to avoid this fragmentation by skillful use of other features of the language can work only in a limited way, for, by force of habit, we tend sooner or later, especially in broad questions concerning our overall world views, to fall unwittingly into the fragmentary mode of functioning implied by the basic structure. The reason for this is not only that the subject-verb-object form of the language is continually implying an inappropriate division between things but even more, that the ordinary mode of language tends very strongly to take its own function for granted,… …because the ordinary mode of thought and language does not properly call attention to its own function, this latter seems to arise in a reality independent of thought and language so that the divisions implied in the language structure are then projected, as if they were fragments, corresponding to actual breaks in ‘what is’. (pp 39-40)

 

Bohm chooses rheo because it means “flow”; so he sees rheomode language structure as flowmodal. For reasons that I hope to support as we go along, I believe Bohm’s rheomode may translate effectively as “ecological.”

My first question has to do with how universally true is this “subject-verb-object” fragmentation of language. Here Bohm speaks of its ubiquitous culturally fragmenting effect especially when discussing things that are Whole Systemic like universal principles and nature and spirituality, dogma and metaphysics. But is it true that nouns always act as static nomials and verbs take all the dynamic action in all languages, is there a linguistic cultural divide in this respect between more Eastern enculturated language, as compared to Western encultured language? Is this as true in aboriginal, unwritten languages, as of post-industrial evolving language? Are there possibly ethological linguistic trends that might distinguish between Northern and Southern hemispheres, germane to this tripartite distinction between progenitive/subject-generative/verb-regeneration/object linguistic functions?

Regardless, Bohm’s ecological rheomode concentrates full language attention on holistic implications of verbs, language as iconic of process, change, development as well as implicating stasis, solidarity, and unraveling. Verbs, verbals, have this binomial function, dialectical form of explicit thesis-function and implied antithesis-appositive dysfunction. Dynamic linguistic function is diametric, binomial analogically and, therefore, binary-balanced digitally. Perhaps analogical information is to binary-coded polynomial information as digital information is to bionically-encoded language-pattern.

Bohm processes us through a 7-stage unfolding of basic verbal bionic function. Language evolves essentially bionic because it grows through a prime relationship between Self (ego) and Other (eco/echo/reiterating environmental input). Self is my information processor, receiving both Interior Landscape (B. Fuller’s Metaphysical Constant Concave Universe) and Exterior Landscape (Fuller’s Physical Convex Universe) messages. Both categories of messages are linguistically articulated only in our left hemispheres. Both categories of messages are temporally-neurally aptic/synaptic affectively received and fractally (4-based logical metric system) co-prehended, intuited, predicated, encoded, implicating memories resonant with RNA/DNA encrypted double-elliptical plasmatic fold/flow/force patterns, defaulting to retain ionic, and bionic, balance.

Just as it is not possible to have a “true” information system that is not binary-balanced, it is not true information that is not binomially structured, with a positive polynomial +form-function that is negatively dipolar correlated with –(-) polynomial equivalently ionic disbalancing chaotic dissonance; an implicit intuited antithesis completing the 100% truth value of each language space-time event. Cognitive awareness, and therefore the development of expressive language, and word choice, is an enthymematic dialogue between right brain’s natural systemic design and development experience, and left brain’s eisegetical hypothesis that what ego’s senses are absorbing remains normatively confluent with our prior unfolding of time encultured memory network.

For now, I want to narrow Bohm’s 7-stage (open-ended octave) taxonomy of  nomials into what appear to me to be the more primal 4-base stages. He analyzes several words as rheomodes. We will use his analytical structure for additional words:

Form

Reform—to form again; spatial dimensions+=+, temporal linear dimension (-)before=(+)now

Reformant [reforming, reform-ionic]—is formant in this now, so choice of form is functionally “Truing”

Irreformant [negative reform-ionic]—is not formed now, so choice of form is functionally “Falsing”

 

When I replace reform with inform, then it becomes easier for me to see not-informant as dissonance, noise, the reception of a message without nutriently redeeming value; lack of confluence, absence of a good as well as absence of truth at this time.

Generate

Regenerate—to conceive again

Regenerant—regenerating now, truing confluent with encoded experience

Irregenerant—negative degenerating-ionic, generative trend is falsing, out of formative and functional potentiating balance.

Nature

Renature—to incarnate, an incarnational linear-string identity of historical continuity

Renaturant—confluent syncing with internal right brain true/good natural experience

Irrenaturant—dissonating from natural systemic order

 

For me, although apparently not for Bohm himself, the logic implied within these fractal forms becomes more transparent if I use co or eco where Bohm uses re and rheo; these are essentially binomially-fractal flow rhythms and patterns of logic and ecologic.

SINE                           (enthymematic +e = +c-function) Uracil = winter permacultural language

COSINE                     right-temporal-only Interior prehension +e-functionally confluent

Cytosine= spring as positive ecocentric hope permacultural logos/logic

Positive [Adonine] + Negative [Guanine] confluent/dissonant neural memory/random-chaos LTR trend-analysis

= regenerating flow-fractal RESOLUTION: SINE equivalently eco-logic, temporally coded function

 

I realize these thoughts have taken some bold analogical leaps, but I believe that if we embrace the basic prime fractal relationship between Interior Landscape’s right-brain dominant ecologic as a reverse corollary of the Exterior Landscape’s left-brain dominant logic, we can uncover empirical, scientific, deductively sequential, logical, rational, as well as good and beautiful and regenetically effective evidence that cognitive dissonance is what happens when co-incidention does not. In other words, we can only cognize as true and logical, right and fair and just, beautiful and good, graced karma what does not cause chaotic temporal-neural flow chaos between our right and left dominant co-incidental pattern and rhythm code memory, within our amazingly binomial information processing DNA speciated brains.

Both psychological and physical/geometric/biometric evidence combine as I comparatively analyze Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetics, Julian Jaynes’ ethological cultural analysis of the left-brain’s evolution of language (The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind). Jaynes’ conjectures have only been further supported by subsequent split-brain research. However, his choice of “breakdown” was important for his historical interest in the evolutionary relationship between consciousness and identity, and, if he were rewriting for a post-millennial audience, he would probably invest rather more ink in our bicameral buildup of right-left equi-valent permacultural balancing trends. That said, his historical evolutionary analysis remains germane for noticing this fractal flow-trend within language and ecological economies of natural systemic value, virtue, nutrition, medicine, health, mental health, power, function, form, information, and ionic/bionic ergetic frequencies.

I find natural (inclusive of human natural) fractals as deeply embedded in our Interior Landscape as Buckminster Fuller, Gregory Bateson, Guy Murchie, and others find within Earth’s, even the Universe’s, natural design and development stages and frequencies and forms. So much so that analogical fractals and polymorphic fractals resolve as ecological and logical regenerative Prime Relationship Fractal Systems.

Some more developmental-fractal eco-nomials that I have included in an article for the Community Development Association:

Comparing synergetic organic paradigms, the unfolding economy of love (Fuller mentioned love as a synonym for how he understood the action of synergy) and seasoned integrity, perhaps wisdom, becomes analogous with Fuller’s fractal unfolding of Universal Intelligence.

Permaculture                           Positive Affect             Learning                      Seasonal Metaphor    

Decompose form/function        Attend/Presence           Notice/Apprehend        Winter/Advent 

Consume function                    Hope?                          Question/Doubt                       Spring

Produce form                           Faith!                           Understand                  Summer

Regenerate information                       Love/Peace…               Comprehend[1]               Fall/Harvest

Regenerative systemic process follows a redemptive economic cycle, in which we intend to “buy back,” reinvest in those outcomes with the best sustained yield-value and least risk of over-unbalancing-investment. Risk aversion itself seems to recommend becoming as cooperatively self-invested as environmental circumstances allow, as a first-tier priority for OCQI yield development. Self-redemptive economies lead to mutually-(co)redemptive economies, lead to self-regenerating Climax Community development, into perpetuity, or permaculturally.

I suspect there may be profound implications for merging linguistic and nutritional health paradigms. For example, I am aware of two psychotherapeutic models rooted in Buddhist philosophy: dialectical behavior and compassionate. They each have their strengths and they are not in any way dissonant with each other. Their primary distinction may be their point of original linguistic perspective. Dialectical behavior therapy comprehends self-identity within a fundamentally Thesis v Antithesis logos/language intellectual and feeling environment. Here we are encouraged to balance our grasping instincts with our immune-aversive instincts. Compassion therapy begins with a Basic Attendance Self-EcoEnvironmentally co-passionate mutual mentoring enthymematic hypothesis, which implies an equivalent +/(-) binomial Thesis/Antithesis Zen Vortex of mindful potential. Compassionate awareness, or love, or synergy, becomes the synergetic holonic balancing of +Thesis-ego-identity with –(-)Antithesis-bionic economical individuation. Mutually appreciated therapeutic benefits now, and anticipated for the future, is what sustains healthy interdependent minds, communication, relationships, intentional communities.

Switching to a Taoist frame, where I have more familiarity and linguistic comfort, this Positive Teleological self-identity information string, following the regenerative evolutionary and revolutionary trends of enculturing history, is the  convex force/form-power/solidarity of Yang; regeneratively completed and dialectically-binomially-economically cooperatively and mutually balanced by concave flow/function-dipolar reflective subsidiarity of co-incidentally reverse proportioning/distortioning/torquing/wavilinear/individuation unraveling Yin’s bi-functional role within Yang-quantic, or ionic, identity. Regenerative Tao balancing trends may be temporally viewed as Yin-prescient to Yang’s linguistic self-consciousness moment, as well as coincidentally wavilinear within each regenerative trending primal event-moment relationship.

Within binary information systems this seems to translate into +1.00% Polynomial information is temporally-linearly equivalent covalent with (+/-)0 QBit Polynomial Bayesian analysis trends.

Why do I think you would care about this?

Perhaps because I read Laura Brown’s feminist psychotherapy work (Subversive Dialogues) before I ran into Compassion Therapy, and something going viral that I think is called Health Home, I have trouble seeing any difference in how they describe an optimally therapeutic linguistic, or rhetorical, or dialectic/dialogical multisystemic environment. When I began my current journey toward verbally and sometimes nonverbally silencing my aversion to what I don’t find compelling in my Oppositionally Disordered daughter, and, instead actively looking for ways to appreciate her Positive functionality, reinforcing and growing her strengths and assets, assuming her screechy-scratchy dissonance has a positive-functional ethological evolutionary role for her, and for our relationship, then I find myself enjoying her more, and she appears to enjoy me more.

 

Anyway, I have certainly not done justice to the linguistic potential you might find in David Bohm’s rheomode, whether it works as a synonym for ecological flow function for you or not. Unfortunately, like Buckminster Fuller, he was an even worse writer than am I. It is easy to get lost in our long, complex strings of interactively dynamic analogies. This, however, is an unfortunate communication challenge for those with a polypathic way of using our nutrient-absorbing sensory receptors. Something I intuit that we might share, or you would not still be reading this.

[1] All systems are subject to comprehension, and their mathematical integrity…and trigonometric interfunctioning can be coped with by systematic [eco]logic. (Fuller, 1975, p. 97) The fourness of self and the fourness of otherness = [binomial and bionic] comprehension. (Fuller, 1979, p. 49)

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

Jaynes and Fuller + Thurston and Perelman

Excerpt from Dr. Beaver’s Post-Millennial Metric History lecture series:

Julian Jaynes understood the history of bicameral psychology development through the eyes of an anthropological ethologist. He was interested in why nature evolved a natural post-bicameral culture. To understand our function, our purpose, we must discover our underlying Left-Right hemispheric evolutionary understory, our root system of developmentally structured meaning. To understand how our precameral neural system generated our languaged metric spacetime Self and Other, individual and individuating system, is to gain comprehension about the “Why?” of evolution as positive system-formation itself.

At the same time, Buckminster Fuller was researching and designing the positive-precessive and negative-recessive geometrics of Physical Universe “Other,” and the bio-normative metrics of Metaphysical Universe “Self;”  intuitively and deductively aligned and (0) Core Vectored in a prime sustained square-rooted natural-systemic relationship of positive development. Yang-Yin thermodynamic relationship balance found it’s emergent post-millennial (0)-logosed changing voice. “As above, so below” also became “as without, so within” Group Universal Theory.

Later, Thurston and Perelman continue this emerging (0)-soul String Theory with the Universal Theorem that if P=NP as +=(-)(-), then form functions in fractal frequencies, explicately and implicately balanced, in 4-equi-dimensional Hilbert systems (like double-elliptical self-temporally regenerating ribonucleic acid), and in our 4-dimensional Universe of Permacultured Thermodynamic Balance. The Theory of Relativity becomes the Tao of (0) Prime QBit Nomial String-Emergent Co-Relationality (also known as appositional dipolar coincidence and negative correlative relationship).

Our Polyculture Research and Design School of Regenerative Systems continues, as individuals, communities, a species, a natural self-regenerating string system, born of Earth, reincarnating into universal comprehension and speciating gratitude for this nobly, deeply, richly, nutritiously shared vocation.

P = NP because there could be no nomial that is not half of a self-defining and -perpetuating binomial. That would be like having a “positive” without a “negative,” a “convex” without a “concave,” an “Other” without a “Self,” “information” without “dissonant distortion.”

Every QBit spacetime nomial-vertex Yang implies within, temporally “before,” and metrically-spatially “over” its Dark Relationship QBit Vortexed, concaved Yin.

Standard