We don’t have a lot of time,
or, well, I guess you do,
but I don’t,
so let’s plunge right into the first big question:
Which came first, form or function?
False dichotomy. No such thing as a totally dysfunctional form,
and no such thing as changing function without some form
distinguished against a static background, or understory.
OK, that was quick!
it just seems that way to you.
what about space and time,
which came first?
Space adds formed place
to time’s potentiating and exforming function.
so linguistic paradox meets coincidental evolution,
So you say.
And, yang and yin?
Yang empowers Time’s form
while Yin unfolds as bilateral yin-yin bipolarity,
all binomial time frequencies,
synergetic trend strings and cycles,
bi-elliptical mutually irradiant,
revolving gravity waves;
like not-not injunctions
and mutual mentors of coredemptive natural intelligence
as accessible as the nearest regenerating cell,
subconscious non-languaged awareness
of synergetic communication and community,
emerging from an eternally unfolding
enthymematic diastolic holding place
of polycultural multisystemic love,
mutual subsidiary solidarity
and coredemptive navigation from past stimuli,
pulling, inviting, seducing
toward future’s ecojust karmic response,
ecological reconnection from past to future in each present time,
re-genesis of The Tree of Coincidental Death and Life,
fear of shortness of time’s revelation, revolution,
between death and life
and yet further death and purgation
toward further freedom and facility and harmonic diversity
of both species and song,
until we sometimes overheat our climatic landscapes
with less than fully optimized permacultural function.
Was that good for you?
I don’t know how many nested climaxes you intended to create there,
what about dark and light,
black and white,
dispossession and possession of transparency?
Black is white light’s full octaved closed-set form
as light is emergent black’s informating octave-ergodic function.
So is that like a color wheel observation
or some kind of cosmologically universal statement?
The ultra-violet spectrum completes time’s full octave frequencies,
your human natured atomic picture frame
of a double-torus shaping universe,
the outline of a tree
including the tree’s equivalent subterranean understory,
and undervalued root system.
Undervalued by egocentric left-brain dominant culture,
not by right-left bicameral balancers
all the way back to Laotse
then on back to shamans noticing naturally seasoned
cycling and recycling systems of birth and decomposition
and then new birth again.
You did it again,
when you sound like you’re channeling Bucky Fuller
and you start talking about one thing
and then pulling words about some other irrelevant thing,
turning analogical coincidence
into ecological correlates.
I suppose that’s how language evolved
to iconically place-hold neural memory patterns
of synaptic crisis and aptically benign norms,
structured as DNA fractals,
cycling octave holonic frequency functions.
I’ll take a pass on ever pretending
connections between DNA’s structure
How about the chicken and egg?
Which came first?
What’s the difference?
I don’t know.
It’s one of those questions philosophers like to ask.
I mean, what’s the difference between a chicken
and its egg?
Well, one has feathers and wings
and sometimes lays an egg
and the other is sort of oval
and smooth hard-shelled,
and gooey inside.
This chicken you are asking about,
did it lay the egg
you are asking about,
did this chicken emerge from the egg
you are asking about?
Or, maybe both,
at different stages of chicken with egg development?
then I guess they too evolved coincidentally.
If I may comment off record here,
you keep asking questions about evolutionary production
and consumption cycles,
as if progenitive decomposition,
through self-renewing stages of paradox
were not the reverse face of regeneration,
as if we could have mature plants
during summer’s contenting heat
without cold hibernation
of winter’s dissonant contentiousness,
or any concept of fully living
without something we fear as death,
loss of corporate-structured life.
I told you I would only do this interview
if you promised to not critique
our stupid questions.
There is no such thing,
but some are much more perennially
and permaculturally productive than others.
If you say so.
What would be the most insightful question I coul ask you
and please go ahead and answer it too.
Save me some trouble.
Why is the duration of your DNA’s life potential
measured only with atomic
cellular-universal ego-rooted quantitative values?
Because positive inductive/consumptive life-form balance
is omnisciently defined by eco-ionic production
of (0) sum binomial root systemic double-crossing
Eulerian prime relationship spacetime function.
The beginning and end of your DNA string
appear terminal rather than transitional
if you identify your self as ego,
rather than your holonic portion of eco-regenerative consciousness.
OK, well, thank you for that,
how do you feel about this interview so far?
Anything else I should ask?
I wish you would give higher priority
to ecological and feminist justice platforms.
What’s the difference
between a feminist agenda
and an ecological platform?
You stand in solidarity with one
while endlessly reiterating the other.
very excellent question.
Which came first
is like asking which is the Host
and which is the benign parasite,
which is the producer and which is the grateful consumer,
when these functions emerge coincidentally
throughout a life,
but also sequentially
across time’s procreation of regenerating space.
You’re doing it again.
Yes and notnot. That’s what I do, reiterative time flows ubiquitously double-bound.
I have a headache. When will Mother Space arrive?
She can’t make it; doesn’t have Time.
I should have seen that coming.
Yes, because it happens all the Time.
I really don’t think that’s in your ego’s best interest at this Time.