If God is monotheistic EggWhite
then Tao is animistic EarthYolk.
Why would you say such a confusing and silly thing?
What is the difference between a natural Tree of Life
and a spiritual Great Chain of Becoming?
Is this a change of subjects
or are you answering my both-and question
with another confusing and silly either-or question?
Easier question:
How are a regenerating Tree of Healthy-Life
then Pathological-Death
and a wealth reproducing
organically multi-generational Chain of Becoming
similar?
If God is a Western ReGenerating/Degenerating Tree,
and Tao is an Eastern ReWeaving/Unraveling Crown and Root
of organic Yin/Yang becoming,
then we might reweave a Crown/Root tree
toward Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s
empowering wisdom experience
“I had perceived everything to be radically connected
with [ecological-economic] politics,
and that, upon whatever principles these were [democratically/autocratically] founded,
a people would never be more than that which the [caste reweaving/unraveling] nature
of the government made [cooperative/competitive] them.”
Both Western dualist divide of human nature Eros
from divine spirit Ethos,
and Eastern nondual co-arising AnthroMind/EarthBody-centric metaphysics
portray a Yang or Yin
Yin and Yang EcoPolitical BiCameral Order
Through devolutionary EthosGod v ErosMan 0-sum
patriarchal dissociation
and evolutionary CrownMind/RootBody non-0 soul
matriarchal association
cobinary governance metaphors
Essentially contending with the double-bind dialectical relationship
of OVER or UNDER
BEFORE and AFTER,
the Win/Win-Yang v Lose/Lose Yin-understory of
Elite verbal LeftBrain unraveling cognition
and NonElite nonverbal RightBrain reweaving intuition
Like bicameral governing Trees of reweaving Life
and unraveling Death,
conserving authentic divine Ethos
and liberating integral humane Eros
Competitively oppositional deductive
either-or chains
of irreligiously dissociative unraveling
AND
cooperative appositional inductions
both yang and yin
mind and body
crown and root polyvagal chains
of re-ligiously associative reweaving
George Lakoff’s “Political Mind”
implies Both/And cooperative
with Either/Or competitive
bicameral governing powers.
“…since we owe everything we are–our very existence–to the workings of [Earth]nature, nature is seen as [regeneratively] moral.”
So, unnatural Crown-Ethos becomes immoral Root-Eros
and immoral Eros becomes unnatural Ethos
“natural hierarchies of [LeftBrain upper v lower dissociative caste] power emerge”
and RightBrain lowerRoot/upperCrown re-associative caste integrity
of bicameral Crown or Root Trees
and Root and Crown interdependently linked
cobinary Chains
Lakoff continues,
“According to the logic of the metaphor,
to find out who is most moral,
look at who has been, over history
[and matriarchal reweaving lower-caste unhistory]
most powerful in the [LeftBrain verbally dominant] hierarchy.
From here,
Lakoff illustrates spatial-moral order metaphors of supremacy over subjects,
ecopolitical Elites over NonElites,
the Elite of Might Makes Win v Lose Right
Nature’s anthropocentric crowning Ethotic endowment
more empowered
in contrast to lower-caste NonElite Erotic roots.
We begin to see some ahistorical,
anti-ecological
temporal before-after
cause-effect reversal dissonance
about whom and what came first,
then second,
in our Great Ethos/Eros Win/Win
organic Crown v Root hierarchical Tree
and sacred Roots before Crowns before Roots bilaterally circular
Chain of Becoming Rewoven.
In our Western Tree of Life and Death,
God rules ProGenitor before and, therefore, above,
DNA-scripted regenerative biosystems.
But, in our nondual co-arising Eastern Organic Chain,
human bicameral Yang/Yin nature
co-evolves with and as Tao’s reweaving/unraveling
caste-associative/caste-dissociative
Yin/Yang
RightEros/LeftEthos
Body/Mind ecological development.
In Western Moral Patriarchal Dissociative Order,
caste-preserving human nature is more sacredly above,
yet not organically-naturally before ,
Earth’s polyculturally regenerative Nature.
In Tao’s Moral Yang/Yin CoBinary Win/Win Order,
Earth’s eros-scripted Nature
nutritionally-organically predicts and precedes
and evokes and invites ecological healthy ethos-reweaving
re-ligioning sacred precedence
toward bicamerally balancing AnthroCrown/EarthBody
nondual EthosSpirit/ErosNature.
Both-And as WinWin
cautions UpperCaste Adults
to not lose touch with historical-temporal governing facts.
We were all RightBrain dominant infants
and more Left/Right VerbalMind/NonverbalBody balancing toddlers
before we became CrownEthos dominant caste dissociatives,
and RootEros recessive caste associatives.
Where Evangelical-Nationalist residents
of USA-RedDominant
place these Uniting States monotheistically above ‘othered’ nations,
a more cooperative Win/Win regenerative view
of natural polyculturing health history
might more humbly remember
this USA is a mere adolescent among Elder creolizing multicultures,
East-before/West-after
ReGenerating Natural WinAnthro/WinEarth Evolution
more sacredly cooperative than 0-sum competitive
caste-dissociative anthropocentric devolution
of immoral ethoticSpirit v eroticNature disorders.
Eastern TaoChains are older than Western GodTrees,
so it seems sacrilegious, immoral, and unnatural
to dissociate
what Gaia has Win/Win associated
sacredly and organically
mentally and physically cobinary
Rather than competitively dividing
Earth’s ErosBody from EthosMind
of pleasure/passion bodhisattva Christ
In which
God is like a transcendent EggWhite Mind
nurturing Gaia’s immanent EarthYolk Body.
gdill52 