Tag Archives: Tao

Uncategorized

Earth’s Green Revolutionary Vocation

We each sacrifice chronic lives and critical moments,

engaged against those we must become engaged with,

like moths enlightened by burning bushes

rooted in hypnotic holy compost,

watered by fears and laughing tears,

inviting redemption’s mutual sacrifice of ego

to balance eco-lateral economic life.

Earth’s teleological and radically inclusive vocation.

 

Take off our shoes!

Shields of harsh and hard immunity,

blocking intuitive holonic light-eternal

icons of time’s spreading revolution.

Free ourselves from bondage

to competitive economics,

unbalanced irrational rush-away ego-competitions.

 

Slow down this inhumane racism

to catch up with ourselves,

with where we all came from,

with how we all optimally

and ultimately share global polyculturing

smooth-souled orthopraxis,

redeeming our future investments

inherited from diverse Elder progenitors’

eyes and hearts and lungs,

inhaling this slower kinder cooperative economy,

mindful,

compassionately interdependent networking

trees of well-shaded life.

 

Sankofa!

Go back through spacetime to retrieve

nourishing power-cultural riches

through shaman’s natural systemic lens

of wise peace and cooperative justice,

love and faith,

hope through positive being,

becoming fully incarnate,

fully alive,

Eden’s Climax Community,

unfolding within each coincidental moment,

each economic subsidiary life,

each evolving Earth element,

each resonantly reverberating eco-logic paradigm.

 

Owl wisely reverses her binomial receptors,

reminding

rewinding nature’s spirited tao systems

of fine-feathered diametric regeneration.

 

 

 

 

Standard
Bio

It started when I turned 8.

My eighth year, that is. But that was 55 years and 4 current teenagers ago.

During all these years, my life-theme question has been, “How can I help?”

The first answer I received from my enculturation process,

but, I have come to believe,

coincidentally received from noticing our natural systemic environment,

as both our ongoing search for the Golden Fleece

and our ongoing research into what are the optimized dimensions

and dynamics

for following the tao of our transcultural thesis,

the Golden Rule of Prime Relationship,

do unto others

as you would have them

do unto you,

or

treat others the way you would be grateful to be treated,

because we’re all in our mess together.

 

So, my Golden Fleece pilgrimage has been about cooperative research

into what could we optimally become if we fully understood its universal wisdom?

Which led to my second, or antithesis, question,

in this dialectic therapeutic quest,

How do I want to be treated?

And who am I that is not Other?

And why do I feel so sure about that?

 

More recently I realized that some of these questions become more secondary

and perhaps not entirely well advised,

and, well, also sort of self-referencing

if we assume that P=NP

and that global, perhaps universal

electromagnetic and thermodynamic balance

within four equivalent dimensions of spacetime

forms our right-elder brained memory function,

as explicated, incarnated,

in implicate-ordered RNA regenerative information

systemic and organic

and permacultural structure.

 

Our interdependently networking Earth’s

Yang balancing Yin harmonies

have not stopped singing,

and ecologically economizing,

since.

 

And yet, my thesis question remains:

How can we help each other,

in the integrity of each moment’s eternally incarnating

positive potential?

Sometimes the best policy is to stay out of each others’ way,

but usually active peace calls us toward mutually mentoring

our ways of becoming

EarthTribe eco-identified.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Tao of SolarSystemic Maintenance

Information caused culture,

some might say cussed culture,

but, whether damned or graced,

culture, or vulture,

languaged-left hemispheric information after

right-brained information

self-regenerated human culture.

 

Human culture preceded human race

and races

and racism

and socioeconomic boxes

and hierarchical trees were upside down

and leaders listened before they judged,

respected our mutual subsidiarity

before they prophecied permacultured futures

and advocated cooperative gift economies,

free-market abundant transactions

of equivalent and profoundly inclusive nutrient values,

reserving competition and anger and fear

for moments of egocentric

corporately commodified weakness.

 

Or maybe there was no such time,

no such moment,

no such life, or culture,

but global hope for this Golden Fleece

was languaged fairly early on

in Golden Rule to treat all life

from here to there

from back then to far ahead

as forming one global polyculture,

of which we are each and all

an interdependent holonic part,

reflecting and reiterating natural systemic

fractals of RNA, then DNA informating strings

of horny codes.

Gift each WeSelf Other well,

with gratitude and compassion,

simplicity and integrity,

sufficiency and balance,

regenerative bows and embrace,

waves and intricate hand gestures,

peace pipes and cooperative barn-raisings,

home raisings,

children raisings,

grace raisings,

life raisings.

 

Information created positive and negative energy,

then communication.

Communication begat language

and language begat culture

and culture begat community

and confusion and suffering,

as suffering begat awareness of evolution

as karmic incarnation,

cause and effect,

stimulus and response,

Yang and Yin,

out and in coincidentally polymorphic,

really trying to get along

on shared pilgrimage to permacultured

Climax Community.

 

Wise permaculture stretches through time’s

great double-bound negative divide,

transitioning forward through encultured icons

and backward beyond eternal information system’s

current lack of diastatic optimization,

racing toward entropic radiant harmonics

across a field of paradigms and language,

remembering

reconnecting

regenerating

eternal prime ecologic principle

of Tao’s economic balance.

 

Culture and language follow information

as function precedes form

as balanced love and synergy precede peace and justice,

as Yin reverse balances Yang

in this positive OVER double-negative

encultured way of measuring and calculating,

economizing and ecologizing,

trimming tipping tabs pointing light’s promise.

 

Longing for light

emerges half life’s distant

reincarnating memory of

light belonging.

Standard
Uncategorized

Active Peace

Polycultural and permacultural,

space and time growth of human communication,

information systems,

common understanding,

Commons economics,

and ultimate integrity of all human concern

and evolution’s informed coordination,

coincidental endosymbiotic cooperation,

karmic incarnation,

of love’s redemptive initiatives–

these harvest active peace.

 

Anger dissipates without an enemy to target

through acts of kindness.

Fear fades coincidentally

as strong-tempered love fulfills its trembling place,

transformed polymorphic place,

Edenic life ionically balancing,

finding humor in ego’s hateful quaking

monoculturing systemic dissipation.

 

All Yang,

no Yin,

original sin,

not Original Intent

of polyculturally balanced

Prime Principle of Universal EcoLogic.

 

Indeed,

P must reverse-valent NP,

as Yang reverses Yin,

as Tao’s enculturing skin economically responds

to namaste invitations from sunlight’s Vitamin D.

 

Photosynthesis enlightens binomial polycultures

and regenetic string theory.

Anger and fear burn monopolistically synaptic,

like sunlight on unprotected skin,

when and where

perma- and poly-

P does not

unfortunately

equal NP.

 

Baptism is to water and air systems

as photosynthesis is to light and soil rooting systems

as yang is to binomial implicating yin,

thusly thereforeversomuchly,

(and exhaustedly)

P DOES = NP!!!

so let’s move on with this Green Revolution

of active peace.

 

I need a nappy.

Standard
Uncategorized

Gospel of Yin, with Yang

Hello,

it’s yin again.

It’s not true

what you say,

that I don’t like science.

 

Science,

your reified sentience,

fueled by solar gnostics

back a couple millennia ago,

pursuing spacetime’s permaculturing path,

dreaming and wondering and wording truth

in faithful Prime Relationship

between researcher and incubating laboratory,

redeemer and creator,

effect and cause,

response and multisystemic stimulus,

form and polycultural function,

you and me.

 

Religion

evolves no more or less spiritually than science;

bipolar polypaths toward active peace,

shared light.

True,

religion’s path grasps love’s goodness and beauty,

while gnostics prehend faith’s truthfulness and proportion,

or not,

or not not,

so yes,

spiritual bipolar balance

merges faith with love

truth with goodness,

me with you,

Right with Left hemispheric balance.

 

I’ve come before,

so many times I’m growing tired,

appearing in male bodies

trying to speak your culture

in some way you might

risk stepping into optimizing polycultural balance,

multisystemic ecotherapy,

remember that entropic trends

are learned by closing,

monopolistic,

competitive,

win-lose,

over-populating systems,

species;

not Open, harmonious, confluent,

my gnostic yin with your religious yang,

your Right natural systemic intuition

with Left linguistic calculating deduction,

dipolar  coincidental regenerative systems

born with DNA-discoding,

unknotting fractal-folded Zero-soul,

balancing out and in,

convex and concave,

atomic and wavilinear,

digital and ecologic,

space and time,

positive and negative,

before and after,

as without, so within,

as above, so below,

this spirit-nature binomial balance

of yang and yin.

 

Entropic dissonating experience of nature’s temporal principles

threatens faithful incarnating passions for ego-self,

reifying, rather than reiterating, ecological systems.

Faith in bipolar Self as Redeemer,

regeneratively potentiating positive life for all

as mutually mentoring parasites,

flowers from hope in our benign Earth Host root system,

yang as diastatic yeastfully articulating yin,

EcoAtmanic system’s universal intelligence,

tao of yin’s diastolic gravitational waves

filling yang’s enlightening bangs, borders, margins.

Without hope for this benign Earth teleology

this human race loses to entropic unraveling

of memory’s space and time,

hopeless despair that together we have become too much and many

yet never enough.

 

I know no other way to invite your polypathic evolution

into dipolar balance,

away from speciated Oppositional Disorder,

absence of hope for faithful true relationships

and this growing ricochet eco-effect

as multisystemic gangs and bullies

lose faith in face of screaming panic wildness,

meeting defiance with defiance,

rather than a restraining hug

and reassurance that we are all in this together,

keep the faith that Left’s purpose will find peace

in Right’s iconic

ionic

coincidental harmonizing

universal mindfulness

of light’s full-octave purity,

transparent Yang

emerging from dark Yin balancing

nature’s diverse systemic frequencies of form and  function.

 

When yang swings left,

flex right yin,

and vice versa.

Repeat regeneratively.

 

Namaste.

Yang, for mute Yin.

Standard
Uncategorized

Tao’s Coincidental Teleology

Co-incidence is binomial, bionic, binary, double-bound information, energetically measured in protons and neutrons and their quantificationic prime relationship.

Dissonance, cognitive dissonance included, is what happens when coincidention does not, is not perceived.

Time’s coincidention is equivalent to space’s content-ionic form. Functional forms of solidarity balance contentious self-strengthening within cooperative contentment of inclusive self-identity.

Permacultural dynamic shamanic (and early Taoist) comprehension of natural systemic evolution as tipping points, species, faces, spaces, forms, nomials, functional flow and force patterns, paradigms and procedures, policies and identities, language and linguistics, communities and communication strings, rhetorical events and fields are coincidental integrity of each moment’s timeless potential for diastatic balance.

In Permaculture Design and Development, we call these diastolically balancing tipping-point statuses Climax Communities; mature polycultural networks of coincidental and mutually-defining information. These tend toward inclusive regeneration of diverse nutrient cooperative economies.

Cooperative economic intent is also coincidental (dialectical) ecological therapeutic orthopraxis.

Climax Communities optimize cooperation by minimizing competitive, win-lose strategic intent, loss, suffering, dissonance, and disease, both physical and metaphysical-mental-cognitive prehension of systemic function-mentors.

Basic multisystemic attendance (what Buddhists understand as a root system toward incarnation’s compassion-mind flower) to Yang’s ego-intentions and Yin’s eco-reiterative purposes, virtues, values, purgative concave balancing praxis is Tao, ecologos, wise economics.

Unwise economic principles, policies, practices, systems, tend to produce monocultural, monopolistic, “weedy” dissonating  global outcomes.

Just as Yang and Yin physical functions follow ubiquitously coincidental (dialectical, bionic) temporal flow-functions, so too Yin is endomorphically double-negative smooth-structuring ionic temporal encoding functional, resolving RNA/DNA fractal memory structure.

Yang discovers eisegetically-held Exterior Landscape information as Yin uncovers exegetical Interior Landscape resonant functions of rhythm and frequency, flow and tipping point force/fold patterns.

Yang is left-hemisphere linguistic/languaged deductive dominant while Yin is right-hemisphere proportional-temporal-relational-affective-intuitive dominant.

Yin is to enculturing original intent as Yang is to coincidental karmic incarnation, an evolving resolution string theory confluent with Fuller’s Universal Intelligence as diastolically predicting  speciated multisystemic reorientation toward universal life’s eternity; a permacultural panentheism of EarthTribe regenesis.

Yin’s double-negative neutronic-concaving zeroism actively harmonizes equivalent reverse temporal-neural frequencies, inviting Yang’s proton-bionic, karmic-ionic convexing incarnation.

There is only coincidental integrity,

space and time’s incarnating potential

inviting

resolving

regenerating multisystemic polyculturing networks

webs

bodies

strings of culturing form and function

waving binomial frequencies

toward more contentment,

less contentiousness.

 

Form is content,

well-formed families and communities

avoid dysfunctional content

by grasping its straining stressful mentoring voice

about not only which dispassions to avoid

but also why

and where to set our polycultural pilgrimage rudder’s tipping point

sweet spot Trim Tab

to grasp when aversion overcompensates,

when avoiding karma’s grasp

would trend toward our dis-grace.

 

Avoid competitive grasping

by grasping cooperative aversions to loss and dissonance.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Basic Multisystemic Compassion

As I approached David Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order I anticipated easy resonance with his philosophy, but was concerned I would be lost in his symbolic math. I had no idea that he had any interest in language or anything that might approach a meta-philosophy of linguistics.

I probably don’t understand enough of this to even successfully explain why it feels so compelling to me, much less why I hope it will be compelling to you. Even so, let me set the stage for his rheomode chapter with a few sentences that grabbed me.

 

…in the present inquiry the rheomode will be concerned mainly with questions having to do with the broad and deep implications of our overall world views which now tend to be raised largely in the study of philosophy, psychology, art, science and mathematics, but especially in the study of thought and language themselves…. …the dominant form of subject-verb-object tends continually to lead to fragmentation, and it is evident that the attempt to avoid this fragmentation by skillful use of other features of the language can work only in a limited way, for, by force of habit, we tend sooner or later, especially in broad questions concerning our overall world views, to fall unwittingly into the fragmentary mode of functioning implied by the basic structure. The reason for this is not only that the subject-verb-object form of the language is continually implying an inappropriate division between things but even more, that the ordinary mode of language tends very strongly to take its own function for granted,… …because the ordinary mode of thought and language does not properly call attention to its own function, this latter seems to arise in a reality independent of thought and language so that the divisions implied in the language structure are then projected, as if they were fragments, corresponding to actual breaks in ‘what is’. (pp 39-40)

 

Bohm chooses rheo because it means “flow”; so he sees rheomode language structure as flowmodal. For reasons that I hope to support as we go along, I believe Bohm’s rheomode may translate effectively as “ecological.”

My first question has to do with how universally true is this “subject-verb-object” fragmentation of language. Here Bohm speaks of its ubiquitous culturally fragmenting effect especially when discussing things that are Whole Systemic like universal principles and nature and spirituality, dogma and metaphysics. But is it true that nouns always act as static nomials and verbs take all the dynamic action in all languages, is there a linguistic cultural divide in this respect between more Eastern enculturated language, as compared to Western encultured language? Is this as true in aboriginal, unwritten languages, as of post-industrial evolving language? Are there possibly ethological linguistic trends that might distinguish between Northern and Southern hemispheres, germane to this tripartite distinction between progenitive/subject-generative/verb-regeneration/object linguistic functions?

Regardless, Bohm’s ecological rheomode concentrates full language attention on holistic implications of verbs, language as iconic of process, change, development as well as implicating stasis, solidarity, and unraveling. Verbs, verbals, have this binomial function, dialectical form of explicit thesis-function and implied antithesis-appositive dysfunction. Dynamic linguistic function is diametric, binomial analogically and, therefore, binary-balanced digitally. Perhaps analogical information is to binary-coded polynomial information as digital information is to bionically-encoded language-pattern.

Bohm processes us through a 7-stage unfolding of basic verbal bionic function. Language evolves essentially bionic because it grows through a prime relationship between Self (ego) and Other (eco/echo/reiterating environmental input). Self is my information processor, receiving both Interior Landscape (B. Fuller’s Metaphysical Constant Concave Universe) and Exterior Landscape (Fuller’s Physical Convex Universe) messages. Both categories of messages are linguistically articulated only in our left hemispheres. Both categories of messages are temporally-neurally aptic/synaptic affectively received and fractally (4-based logical metric system) co-prehended, intuited, predicated, encoded, implicating memories resonant with RNA/DNA encrypted double-elliptical plasmatic fold/flow/force patterns, defaulting to retain ionic, and bionic, balance.

Just as it is not possible to have a “true” information system that is not binary-balanced, it is not true information that is not binomially structured, with a positive polynomial +form-function that is negatively dipolar correlated with –(-) polynomial equivalently ionic disbalancing chaotic dissonance; an implicit intuited antithesis completing the 100% truth value of each language space-time event. Cognitive awareness, and therefore the development of expressive language, and word choice, is an enthymematic dialogue between right brain’s natural systemic design and development experience, and left brain’s eisegetical hypothesis that what ego’s senses are absorbing remains normatively confluent with our prior unfolding of time encultured memory network.

For now, I want to narrow Bohm’s 7-stage (open-ended octave) taxonomy of  nomials into what appear to me to be the more primal 4-base stages. He analyzes several words as rheomodes. We will use his analytical structure for additional words:

Form

Reform—to form again; spatial dimensions+=+, temporal linear dimension (-)before=(+)now

Reformant [reforming, reform-ionic]—is formant in this now, so choice of form is functionally “Truing”

Irreformant [negative reform-ionic]—is not formed now, so choice of form is functionally “Falsing”

 

When I replace reform with inform, then it becomes easier for me to see not-informant as dissonance, noise, the reception of a message without nutriently redeeming value; lack of confluence, absence of a good as well as absence of truth at this time.

Generate

Regenerate—to conceive again

Regenerant—regenerating now, truing confluent with encoded experience

Irregenerant—negative degenerating-ionic, generative trend is falsing, out of formative and functional potentiating balance.

Nature

Renature—to incarnate, an incarnational linear-string identity of historical continuity

Renaturant—confluent syncing with internal right brain true/good natural experience

Irrenaturant—dissonating from natural systemic order

 

For me, although apparently not for Bohm himself, the logic implied within these fractal forms becomes more transparent if I use co or eco where Bohm uses re and rheo; these are essentially binomially-fractal flow rhythms and patterns of logic and ecologic.

SINE                           (enthymematic +e = +c-function) Uracil = winter permacultural language

COSINE                     right-temporal-only Interior prehension +e-functionally confluent

Cytosine= spring as positive ecocentric hope permacultural logos/logic

Positive [Adonine] + Negative [Guanine] confluent/dissonant neural memory/random-chaos LTR trend-analysis

= regenerating flow-fractal RESOLUTION: SINE equivalently eco-logic, temporally coded function

 

I realize these thoughts have taken some bold analogical leaps, but I believe that if we embrace the basic prime fractal relationship between Interior Landscape’s right-brain dominant ecologic as a reverse corollary of the Exterior Landscape’s left-brain dominant logic, we can uncover empirical, scientific, deductively sequential, logical, rational, as well as good and beautiful and regenetically effective evidence that cognitive dissonance is what happens when co-incidention does not. In other words, we can only cognize as true and logical, right and fair and just, beautiful and good, graced karma what does not cause chaotic temporal-neural flow chaos between our right and left dominant co-incidental pattern and rhythm code memory, within our amazingly binomial information processing DNA speciated brains.

Both psychological and physical/geometric/biometric evidence combine as I comparatively analyze Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetics, Julian Jaynes’ ethological cultural analysis of the left-brain’s evolution of language (The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind). Jaynes’ conjectures have only been further supported by subsequent split-brain research. However, his choice of “breakdown” was important for his historical interest in the evolutionary relationship between consciousness and identity, and, if he were rewriting for a post-millennial audience, he would probably invest rather more ink in our bicameral buildup of right-left equi-valent permacultural balancing trends. That said, his historical evolutionary analysis remains germane for noticing this fractal flow-trend within language and ecological economies of natural systemic value, virtue, nutrition, medicine, health, mental health, power, function, form, information, and ionic/bionic ergetic frequencies.

I find natural (inclusive of human natural) fractals as deeply embedded in our Interior Landscape as Buckminster Fuller, Gregory Bateson, Guy Murchie, and others find within Earth’s, even the Universe’s, natural design and development stages and frequencies and forms. So much so that analogical fractals and polymorphic fractals resolve as ecological and logical regenerative Prime Relationship Fractal Systems.

Some more developmental-fractal eco-nomials that I have included in an article for the Community Development Association:

Comparing synergetic organic paradigms, the unfolding economy of love (Fuller mentioned love as a synonym for how he understood the action of synergy) and seasoned integrity, perhaps wisdom, becomes analogous with Fuller’s fractal unfolding of Universal Intelligence.

Permaculture                           Positive Affect             Learning                      Seasonal Metaphor    

Decompose form/function        Attend/Presence           Notice/Apprehend        Winter/Advent 

Consume function                    Hope?                          Question/Doubt                       Spring

Produce form                           Faith!                           Understand                  Summer

Regenerate information                       Love/Peace…               Comprehend[1]               Fall/Harvest

Regenerative systemic process follows a redemptive economic cycle, in which we intend to “buy back,” reinvest in those outcomes with the best sustained yield-value and least risk of over-unbalancing-investment. Risk aversion itself seems to recommend becoming as cooperatively self-invested as environmental circumstances allow, as a first-tier priority for OCQI yield development. Self-redemptive economies lead to mutually-(co)redemptive economies, lead to self-regenerating Climax Community development, into perpetuity, or permaculturally.

I suspect there may be profound implications for merging linguistic and nutritional health paradigms. For example, I am aware of two psychotherapeutic models rooted in Buddhist philosophy: dialectical behavior and compassionate. They each have their strengths and they are not in any way dissonant with each other. Their primary distinction may be their point of original linguistic perspective. Dialectical behavior therapy comprehends self-identity within a fundamentally Thesis v Antithesis logos/language intellectual and feeling environment. Here we are encouraged to balance our grasping instincts with our immune-aversive instincts. Compassion therapy begins with a Basic Attendance Self-EcoEnvironmentally co-passionate mutual mentoring enthymematic hypothesis, which implies an equivalent +/(-) binomial Thesis/Antithesis Zen Vortex of mindful potential. Compassionate awareness, or love, or synergy, becomes the synergetic holonic balancing of +Thesis-ego-identity with –(-)Antithesis-bionic economical individuation. Mutually appreciated therapeutic benefits now, and anticipated for the future, is what sustains healthy interdependent minds, communication, relationships, intentional communities.

Switching to a Taoist frame, where I have more familiarity and linguistic comfort, this Positive Teleological self-identity information string, following the regenerative evolutionary and revolutionary trends of enculturing history, is the  convex force/form-power/solidarity of Yang; regeneratively completed and dialectically-binomially-economically cooperatively and mutually balanced by concave flow/function-dipolar reflective subsidiarity of co-incidentally reverse proportioning/distortioning/torquing/wavilinear/individuation unraveling Yin’s bi-functional role within Yang-quantic, or ionic, identity. Regenerative Tao balancing trends may be temporally viewed as Yin-prescient to Yang’s linguistic self-consciousness moment, as well as coincidentally wavilinear within each regenerative trending primal event-moment relationship.

Within binary information systems this seems to translate into +1.00% Polynomial information is temporally-linearly equivalent covalent with (+/-)0 QBit Polynomial Bayesian analysis trends.

Why do I think you would care about this?

Perhaps because I read Laura Brown’s feminist psychotherapy work (Subversive Dialogues) before I ran into Compassion Therapy, and something going viral that I think is called Health Home, I have trouble seeing any difference in how they describe an optimally therapeutic linguistic, or rhetorical, or dialectic/dialogical multisystemic environment. When I began my current journey toward verbally and sometimes nonverbally silencing my aversion to what I don’t find compelling in my Oppositionally Disordered daughter, and, instead actively looking for ways to appreciate her Positive functionality, reinforcing and growing her strengths and assets, assuming her screechy-scratchy dissonance has a positive-functional ethological evolutionary role for her, and for our relationship, then I find myself enjoying her more, and she appears to enjoy me more.

 

Anyway, I have certainly not done justice to the linguistic potential you might find in David Bohm’s rheomode, whether it works as a synonym for ecological flow function for you or not. Unfortunately, like Buckminster Fuller, he was an even worse writer than am I. It is easy to get lost in our long, complex strings of interactively dynamic analogies. This, however, is an unfortunate communication challenge for those with a polypathic way of using our nutrient-absorbing sensory receptors. Something I intuit that we might share, or you would not still be reading this.

[1] All systems are subject to comprehension, and their mathematical integrity…and trigonometric interfunctioning can be coped with by systematic [eco]logic. (Fuller, 1975, p. 97) The fourness of self and the fourness of otherness = [binomial and bionic] comprehension. (Fuller, 1979, p. 49)

Standard
Uncategorized

Cooperative Therapy

EarthTribe lives with

by

for

as cooperative integrity,

Yin-root of Yang

compassioning filled-up mind,

metaphysical spacetime’s place,

polyculturing home.

 

EarthTribe’s chronic issue

with and from

stimulating and responding

causing and effecting

winning and losing

dialectical behavior’s therapeutic intent,

silently implied assumption

of primally inclusive Thesis.

From how far back in orthodox history

has this Prime Relationship hypothesis emerged?

Which Thesis do we prefer, and why?

 

Are we in a human race to save scarce time,

without enough for all EarthTribe,

to profusely sweat resonant resolving power

overflowing with bucket lists of diversely correct needs

and inclusive righteous wants,

our asks,

our truly organic special interests,

our WeSelf-marketing,

our egoistic self-delighted wisdom?

 

Is that who we are,

what we inherited,

how we want our  autistic kids to live in

this great transitional

charismatic

Millennialistic Tribe?

 

Or, could we belong as parasitic cooperators

mentors

prime rooted in power of equi-valent solidarity,

mutually subsidiary,

harmoniously balancing

economizing

eco-logical orthopraxis?

 

Do we have sufficient time

for gratitude,

sharing this benign EarthHost

we think of as an ecosystem,

we resolve to co-prehensilely embrace

as integrating incarnation’s multisystemic relationships,

we permaculturally plant as self-optimizing polycultures,

we learn as Deep and Wide Ecology,

we humor as eco-centric Zeroism,

wishful willing messianic redeemers,

self-inflicting wild polypathic prophets,

we compute as (0)-sum geometric crystal forms,

spirals,

revolutions,

fractals,

octaves,

waves,

quantic dancing functions and gravity’s restrained relationships,

frequencies of analogical energy

and digitized,

atomized,

double-binary,

dipolar,

binomially balancing informational development trends,

thermodynamic and electromagnet-ionic panentheism

smooth-structuring ragged chaos,

bionically speaking,

both Universal Metric  closed-field Set

and metadynamic,

openly magnanimous

CommonSystem?

 

Metaphysical Positive/Yang greets Negative/Yin

as Physical Universe’s non-polynomial timeless chaos

returns his Grand Empirical,

Polynomial Space-carnating Way.

 

EarthTribe lives cooperative integrity,

spacetime’s polyculturing EarthHome.

Each moment plant’s nutrient seeds,

yesterday’s twisting,

and hopefully tomorrow’s turning,

synchronic swimming-flying flowers.

 

 

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Buddha’s Permaculturing Brain

Can we EarthTribally intuit

confluent therapeutic information frequencies of harmony

averse only toward

Empiric deductive-dissonant Win?-Lose

divinely not-so-inspired economies

of confused and suffering ecologic?

 

Surely declaring nature as not kind

is not equivalent to experiencing nature as intrinsically unkind,

much less unloving or stupid,

a bully,

just as wrestling with God

is not necessarily wrestling against God?

 

Each incarnating investment string with which and whom

I gratefully greet and resonate,

mutually karmating our cooperative

solarsynthetic-fueled subsidiarity,

potentially, our regenerative synergy together,

belongs with, by, for, if me

on this our last day of becoming

and our first day of being

this perennially resolving,

harmoniously evolving,

while dissonantly revolving,

Tao true-balancing (0)-centric EarthDay.

 

Our millennium for Empirical Self-Bullying

now made bidextrously obsolete

with ambidextrous PermaTeleological

redemptively regenerative MentorShamans,

polyculturing our cooperative eco-normic,

positively deviant,

way true belonging lives.

 

Longing wrestles equivalent eternal encultured belonging,

as Yin advents Yang,

as -(-) predicts + form and lambent flowing-function.

 

 

Standard