Zero
123, Step
into and through Earth’s dialectical dance
of spacetime’s evolution.
Lateral slide your economic relationships
Left to Right to co-arise Left again,
Step forward in your politically optimal
health power,
Then
step back
to rejoin
this political/economic bicameral wu wei
dialectically dawning dance
of eco-logic’s RNA-fueled
bicameral co-value octaves
of polyculturally confluent
eco-polypathic cooperative revolution–
(0)
Tag Archives: political
Catalyzing CoEmergence
S/he reads, with great enthusiasm,
Andrew Cohen’s take on “Catalyzing Emergence.”
“The most challenging aspect of vertical spiritual development is the evolution of our value spheres. Given the right circumstances, it is not difficult to enter higher states of consciousness and in those higher states, to glimpse the exciting possibilities that await us on the other side of the status quo, beyond our predictable and fixed way of perceiving how things are. But it is another matter altogether to dislodge those predictable and rigid perspectives and embrace new and higher values.” (p 185, 2011, “Evolutionary Enlightenment: A New Path to Spiritual Awakening.”
S/he hears:
A challenging aspect of deep ecological development
is this continuing evolution
of our political-economic
(reductively labeled “military-industrial” in Left-brain dominant languages) bicameral spheres of co-arising influence.
Given sufficient rationally ecological comprehension,
it is not difficult to enter deeper states of ecological consciousness
and in those deeper states of polycultural nutrition,
to glimpse sustaining possibilities awaiting us
on tomorrow’s more paradigmatically confluent side
of the present moment,
beyond our predictable competitions
of ego- and anthro-centered monocultures
and our fixed way of perceiving
how our own nature evolves toward health
and/or pathology.
But we are altogether an Other’s co-passioned matter to balance/tip
those predictable and rigid ego/anthro elitist perspectives
and re-join deeper (0)-centric co-intelligent wealth
and higher health/ecotherapeutic values.
And s/he is glad for such rich compost to fill Earth’s Day,
Catalyzing Co-Emergence.
Open Letter to Co-Evolutionaries
Dear Andrew Cohen,
I am riveted by “Evolutionary Enlightenment: A New Path to Spiritual Awakening.” Your theme that enlightenment need not be limited to elitist and eisegetical experiences, memory, but invites us to become co-pilgrims in and through this evolutionary epic, feels both important and strategic for this climatically transitional time.
Perhaps because I just finished reading Charles Eisenstein’s “Sacred Economics,” which also tells an evolutionary story, I am hearing your voice as inviting evolution toward the primal economic value of health. Not just healthy outcomes for human nature, but for all of Earth’s Tribes.
I am also influenced by at least three other evolutionary models that offer some interesting collective redundancy about the evolution of consciousness as emerging toward a cultural revolution of bicamerally balanced (Julian Jaynes, evolutionary developmental psychology of Left-brain language and cultural bicameral dissonance) eco-consciousness as eco-logic, a dialectic co-arising Earth’s RNA enculturation with AnthroCentric DNA as YangDominant ecobalancing YinRecessive regenerational CQI Standards for health assurance, surviving thru thriving, inclusively polycultural in diastatic/climax universal spacetime position.
Where you think of “vertical momentum,” I read deep Exterior/Interior Landscape Ecologically Rooted Cooperative UnEarthing.
Where you choose “creative,” I choose regenerative [PermaCultural.
Where you remind us, and warn us, that “ [t]he evolutionarily enlightened soul lives for change” I want to nuance eco-consciousness is of both positive and negative change, both nurturing and toxic, and more polyculturally enlightened ecosystems nurture therapeutic, healthy change, and disinvest of pathological, dissonantly unhealthy and both economically and ecologically irrational change. Wow, that was kind of long, so you can see, perhaps, I am also influenced by the geometric systems of mind revolutionary Prime-Relationship dynamic system theory of Buckminster Fuller.
So, again, where you choose “change” I would probably choose “optimizing polycultural health” of positively deviant evolutionary trends. (recommend www.positivedeviance.org kind of a health-related social-evolutionary systems theory, producing surprisingly positive health and safety outcomes. Makes me wonder what positively deviant characteristics, patterns, lifestyle decisions, economic and political decisions might we find in the population of seasoned ecotherapists and feminist-permaculturists and organic farmers? Probably more cooperatively Win-Win strategists and interdependently-relationally/transactionally oriented, more eco-centric, and less Left-brain dominant competitive Win-Lose egocentric. I’m guessing that’s what Earth’s climatically changing voices might be showing us as important PolyCulturally Healthy Positive Deviance.
“we are part of a process that is [cooperatively] going somewhere.” Again, while I realize this word “cooperative” may be implied by our evolutionary context for you, that is not necessarily the perspective of more marginalized, stigmatized, under-valued readers who understand our evolution story as profoundly Win-Lose competitive. I learned in grade school that the theory of evolution supports the historical accuracy of survival of the fittest; certainly suggesting it would be to one’s advantage to at least steer away from those who are the least fittest, as these are inevitably hopeless losers in life’s crapshoot.
It is both good and important news, then, that Earth’s evolution of ecoconsciousness is both positively trending toward polyculturally cooperative interdependent health optimization, while monocultural competitive independent wealth deposits have already begun to wilt.
“Most human beings don’t live for change.” but do live for love, synergy, healthy thrival, which requires developmental change.
I suspect our deep “preconscious orientation toward stasis” is also a deep dis-logical cultural orientation toward Win-Lose political/relational and economic/normative/monomial competition stasis.
While “living for change” does indeed sound “unbearable,” living for sustainable polyculturally-inclusive cooperative health-therapy for Me and We sounds like an opulent life of Beloved Community abundance could at least be a shared hope among the evolutionarily enlightened.
To conclude, for fear of excessive redundancy, from p. 185, your sentences in quotes, with my perhaps too dense nuancing in brackets:
“The cultural ego is the [Left brain dominant-languaged OVER Right brain recessive-inductive] status quo, which lives in both our [Left] conscious [language] and [Right-autonomic temporal-syntaxed, regeneratively functioned] unconscious [unlanguaged] minds.”
“It [cultural ego] consists of all the deeply held images and conditioned [norms of Earth’s ecological positive/negative] beliefs that define for us what [evolutionary] life is supposed to look like.” [cooperatively struggling with, not competing against while using Win-Lose Evolutionary Gaming Programs and stories, language, absorbed into an ecoculturally dissonant struggle with insufficiency, lack of adequacy, shortness of ego’s time]
“It is impossible to separate any notion of individuality and personal [political, economic, familial, tribal, cooperative, ecological, healthy, therapeutic] identity from these core values that have such an [Tipping Point as wu wei] influence on who we are and how we see the world.”
Which brings me to the third teleological evolutionary theory in my life, an emerging TransMillennial Taoism, perhaps. Where we struggle against our unraveling Left-brain dominant straight white male over-representation on the “Most Likely to Stay Healthy through Future Generations”, I see Yang power, paradigmatically parallel to Buckminster Fuller’s “convex polynomial universal energy”; and where we struggle with our Right-brain recessive non-white, not-straight, feminist over-representation on the “Most Likely to Help all of us Stay Healthy through Future Generations, I see YinYin as WinWin unitarianly opulent flow-pattern frequencies, paradigmatically parallel to B Fuller’s “concave bilateral unitarian dipolar co-arising/co-falling Time,” breathing in this healthy intimacy of sacred eco-conscious passion, to breathe out cooperative peace inclusive of all Earth’s Tribes.
Do you happen to know what I mean?
With warm regard, Namaste,
0-Liver Glory
Mutual Messiahs, ReMix
Who’s vision are you unfolding for whom?
Are you aware you carry a basket of bread
on your head
and still beg at every door? (Rumi)
You love nature.
Like bread, Earth’s nature feeds you
and, like yeast, absorbs you,
is that of which you are made,
and making,
and resolve to eternally create and recreate,
if only you could.
But, you can and you are
and the manna in your head already knows
healthy yeast redeems regenerationally
diastatically incarnational,
with smooth-souled omnicoherence,
comprehensively balancing deduction with induction,
eco-confluent paradigms and dreams and language
and permaculture,
ecological teleology systematically grows panentheistic,
polytheistic,
polynomial,
polypathic,
polycultural,
balancing cooperative economies with networking political vocations
to permanently eco-logicize Earth.
This is your Day, your EcoTribal Self
our EcoLogic metaculture and Transhistory,
our EcoTherapy synergy,
tipping toward balancing points and principles
of blinding spiritual intuition with restrained scientific deduction,
harmonizing Left-brained language
with Right-brained confluent v. dissonant inductive awareness
of this bicameral basket on our head
as our balancing supereco and my id-entity
engaging your ego/eco balancing praxis,
whether hope-filled or hopeless,
triumphant or despairing,
you know this already,
throughout this manna that is your nesting culture,
decomposing through unraveling death’s long post-millennial process
to regenerate as
“redistributed [positive-therapeutic] subfunctions
of Other” informing ecosystems. (B. Fuller)
Born of stardust,
messiahs mutually mentoring
our pilgrimage toward Earth’s starlight;
e-squared function = c-crystal (cubed)
subatomic polyculture,
waiting behind each begging door
for you to return Other’s cooperatively gravitating namaste
mutual unfold.
Optimized Living Systems are to metaphysical teleology
as ecosystems are to physically regenerating (“special case”) economies,
as EcoTherapy informs design, intention, empirical research,
learning and consciousness,
love, and active peace, and justice,
and RNA self-optimizing fractally-dynamic information
QBit Quirky Byting Octaves, harmonic CQI Win-Win yinyin syntax,
ionic and ergodically balancing value systems.
Your bicameral basket holds no non-polynomial information
because this is an oxymoron,
we already intuitively know everything and all not-thing metaphysical
as diverse resolutions of Prime +/- (0)-synced Relationship,
polynomial information negatively correlates wild binomial yeast
soaring surf of time’s double-bound equinox divide.
Please continue unfolding our permacultured cooperative co-arising political vision,
mutual investment
biosystemic and ecosystemic and information binary-network systemic
and stop begging from competitively unbalanced economists,
it’s just not dignified,
or anything close to wildly, creatively, fun.
Merging with Co-Mentoring Light
Further conversation with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 184, 2011, SelectBooks, NY. My co-arising commentary in brackets.
“What I have discovered is that the very same [integrating] principle applies when we are trying to catalyze emergence at the [internal] level of [eco]consciousness and [of external eco]culture.
The [political and economic language balance] conditions must be [co-operatively] right.
In fact, I often use the metaphor of a ‘New Being’ to describe this emergent cosmocentric [holon of Sacred Earth] cultural potential [for cooperative revolution thru co-arising eco-consciousness of Ego as EcoOther].
Just as individual [RNA-fueled] cells came together to make up a larger [DNA-composted] organism, [imaginatively] autonomous, evolving individual [holonic-holy] human beings consciously come together to give rise [co-arise/co-decompose] to a dynamic greater [Beloved Community] whole.
And this emergent potential of [r]evolutionary [cooperative political with economic] Enlightenment is completely dependent upon those individual cells—those [fractally-syntaxed] autonomous, evolving [life-]beings—making the effort to understand [to give voice to] and be a [healthy loving] living expression of the [intuitively-deductively] inconceivably delicate balance of [Earth language] conditions that make it possible for [Her] to come into existence.” [to rejoin our cooperative thriving as Anthro of Earth’s Tribes, mutually parasitic eco-pilgrims toward (0)Mega ReLigion of ConScience, EcoCentric Consciousness.]
Esoteric EcoTerra
Nomial is to Relational
as
Subject is to Object
as
progenitorNoun is to actionVerb
as
Stimulus is to Response
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural is to Polycultural
as
+Yin is to +Yang/(-,-)Yin balancing
as
+/- Bicameral Owl Medicine is to full-bodied Moose Medicine’s
PolyCultural Timeless Party
Uracil articulates Love/Synergy
as Moose dominant positive.
Cytosine articulates Co-Integrative Peace
as Owl precessive/camouflage (shy) positive
Guanine articulates FearMongering
as Moose recessive-negative over-powering
Adenine articulates Anxiety/Anger/Depression
as Owl recessive-oppressed negative.
NounYin evokes VerbYang,
gender and culture equivalency of value
SelfValue emerges through MooseMed progenitive stimulation
with
OwlMeds bicamerally responsive to Other as Worthy,
together
EcoLogical In-Formation bilateral cooperation
network.
This bilaterality of seasoned polynomial language
emerges
assimiliterative enthymematic resonance
with
assimilaterative geometric assonance
regenerating
ecological wisdom compost for optimizing healthy wealth.
To respect
to look back, to regard from our past,
nature’s language is to empathize
with where we have chosen to come from.
To reconnect/repassion nature’s language,
inclusive of human,
but not so much dominated thereby,
is to empathize with Other’s basic right of freedom
toward positive dynamic functionality
for regenerative cooperation,
synergetic health,
love.
Owl’s YinYin Medicine for balancing eco-normics
is progenitive/precessive
toward
Yang Moose Medicinal PolyCultural Political Power
inclusive of all Earth’s universal positive healthy nature.
Cooperative economic peace is to yin’s Owl Medicine
as ecompassionate political power is to yang’s Moose Medicine.
We co-mentor
seeing
smelling
hearing
tasting
touching
feeling
absorbing
racing
engendering
comprehending
regenerating
Earth and Other as Yangprocessive-Yinrecessive Full-Fractal Harmonics,
not so much climatic Yang Left-brain domination,
but not too Yin Right-brain politically struggling shy of healthy ego/eco balanced esteem.
PostMillennial Taoists
cognize balance speaking through all Nature’s Earth-bound voices,
Nature does not always speak YinKin kind,
but Earth is not so Yang unkind either,
in full-double Namaste resonant response.
Spiritual Subjects are to Natural Objects
as
Before is to After
as
Monocultural Political Language is to Polycultural EcoNormic Outcomes
as
PreMillennialism is to Post-Polypathic Millennialism
as
Struggling-Against Contentious Living co-arises Struggling-With Contented Loving
as
Bicameral Function co-arises Positive In-Formating Regeneration
as
Becoming is to Being
Conversation with Chris Santos-Lang
My internal conversation with you, Kramer, Bressan, and all our microbes, together, in brackets.
What “Letting People [and Places, including Earth] Be Themselves” Means
Chris Santos-Lang
In “Humans as Superorganisms: How Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes, and Other Selfish [Mutually-Struggling] Entities Shape Our Behavior,” Peter Kramer and Paola Bressan present evidence that we are [nondual] “not unitary individuals,” but rather “collections of human and nonhuman [RNA/DNA-regeneratively syntaxed] elements that…in an incessant [cooperatively contentious] struggle [default as positive ‘with’ and sometimes ‘negative reverse-synaptic’ against], jointly define who we are.” The research they highlight challenges those of us who want to ‘let people be themselves’ to explain precisely what we mean by “themselves [and ourselves.” If people are [nondual] not unitary individuals, then what could “themselves [as ourselves]” refer to?
The notion that we are not unitary individuals is not new. [Plato didacted the interdependence of intrinsically social beings, and the neoplatonists went wild with that core holonic universal view.] Quantum physicists have pointed out that every atom of our bodies is entangled with the entire universe [inclusive of both Bohm’s Explicate Order and Implicate Order and Buckminster Fuller’s Convex-Positive-Special Case v. Concave-Double-Bilateral-Reverse-String-Temporal Metaphysical Interior Eco-Cooperative TransParent Function-more or less], biologists have pointed out that less than 2% of those atoms remain in us for over a year, and psychologists have pointed out that the mechanisms of our [positive] cognition typically extend beyond our brains to include scratchpads, musical instruments, calculators, and the Internet [and extend back through time toward the distant progenitive-as-regenerative origins of fractal-syntaxed RNA]. Kramer and ressan add merely that our [economic] values [as objectives] and [political] preferences [as subjective progenitors]–what we call our “soul”–is just as entangled with our environment as are our other aspects.
In my opinion, the most compelling branch of their argument is the one relating to microbes. Only about 10% of the various types of [RNA/DNA fueled] cells our bodies require to flourish are [DNA] human. The rest are [RNA-uracil-rooted] microbes. Although most of the microbe studies cited by Kramer and Bressan were conducted on mice, it seems clear that the decisions humans make–how we vote, whom we marry, whether we commit a crime–depend upon which microbes dominate our internal [autonomic] ecosystem at the time. Thus, we can lose our [perception of autonomous] identity–the person our friends know us to be may cease to [monopolistically] inhabit our [mind-]bodies–not just through a lobotomy, but also through some combination of antibiotics and probiotics which irreversibly [or reversibly? I wonder?] tip the balance of power among the microbes within us.
Such microbes might be called parasites of our [mutually parasitic] bodies, but they cannot be parasites of [with?] our selves, for they are an essential part of who we are. Kramer and Bressan would argue that our rights belong to our entire internal [and external] ecosystem[ic landscapes], including those microbes. Laws to protect you [and Earth] must therefore take the form of laws to protect an ecosystem, not necessarily protecting particular microbes, but protecting [mutually parasitic reverse-hierarchically structured, increasingly cooperative metasystemic, with bilateral (concave/convex) spacetime, co-prehensive] balance among them. This sets the stage for shocking reform of our legal system and conception of human [as nature’s spiritua/ergodic/ionic/cogravitational] rights [of freedom to cooperate balancing freedom from struggling-against competition of Other].
Perhaps the paradigm of “selfish-survivalist” genes has been unduly influenced by a culturally jaundiced interpretation of Darwinian evolutionary struggle. But the default setting on Darwinian evolution is positive-regenerative, which would suggest struggling with others to maintain co-gravitational balance, perhaps defining what I mean by eco-normic cooperation. Nature’s biological systems seem to struggle against mutually negative {lose, lose} eco-gravitational disbalancing choices, which might be paradigmed as competitive eco-politics. Struggling is normatively neutral; “selfish” is not, and assumes a monocultural level of competitive-default objectives that is not supported by the regenerative fact that cooperative polyculturally organic nature, life, exists at all.
Summary Notes, Dillenbeck:
Cooperative economic subjects lead toward competitive, politically-healthy, objectives of eco-consciousness.
Struggling with suboptimized relationships avoids over-attachment to a moderately-healthy Win-Lose poly-econormic status-quo.
Struggling against suboptimally dissonant-yet-static relationships avoids over-detachment from a perceived-as-toxically-competitive (over-heated/drama climate) status-quo.
For more from Chris Santos-Lang, visit http://www.grinfree.com
Romeo and Juliet: The ReMix
Three voices required,
Professor,
and two students:
Yang as Fr. Time
YinYin as Sr. Gaia
In a college classroom with Win-Win Game Theory written on whiteboard.
Professor:
Today we are going to role play
a Win-Win enculturation game.
We will define enculturation as
‘the combination of political and economic reiterative relationships and transactions
within a communicating network
of choice-making.’
The absence of political-economic co-arising redundancy
generates systemic dissonance,
suboptimized positive outcomes, at best,
in which positive information is lost,
putting this enculturation game at risk of turning from Win-Win,
to Win-Lose.
This would result in a suboptimized and, to that extent,
polypathological outcome,
useful for recognizing opportunities to do better,
to do good and fair and justice,
to do Being, fully cooperatively eco-balanced consciousness.
Maybe.
We’ll see.
Fr. Time: [In an appropriately low gravelish slow-sucking voice]
I need to play Yang.
Sr. Gaia: [In a lovely round full-chested soprano]
I want to play yang as Yin.
Professor:
Good, good. OK.
So. let’s imagine that Yang,
played by Fr. Time,
is Romeo Logos,
and Yin,
played by Sr. Gaia,
is Juliet Mythos.
But, this is a Win-Win Game,
so Juliet, of the Mythos family,
chooses to stay planted on lovely Earth
because she loves the Cinderella story,
so maybe she’ll just sleep on her decision about what to do with her life,
and see what happens later in the Prince Charming
as Romeo Logos
Department of her mythic romantic life.
With Juliet asleep,
Romeo Logos storms through life’s stage all blood and thunder.
Wakes Mythos,
and they are filled with co-passionate ecstasy for themselves,
each other,
and all of Earth,
and all of Earth’s Tribes,
and all of the above live happily ever after.
[pause] Why is that not a more satisfying,
healthier
story for every time our language and culture
our political and economic outcomes
trend toward a despairing climatic precipice?
Fr. Time: [speaking as gravelish Yang—2 packs a day, at least]
I feel so used up. My health, vibrancy, robust vitality fades.
Sr. Gaia: (as Yin)
All your over-heated competitive passions for violence and revolution have left me sore! So good riddance, we are finding our Midway, balancing our deductive language Logos family and our inductive autonomic Mythos Memory
of +Romeo-synapse = double-negative Juliet’s optic fractal message to disremember 50% despair = “lose”
as +UracilRomeo = CytosineJuliet, double-bound reverse-temporal Uracil (concave bilaterally equivalent fold).
Fr. Time:
Sometimes your Gaia Story is too negentropically dissonant with the Logos family’s Golden Rule.
Sr. Gaia:
Yes, but only when Yin as Yang and Yin as Yin are not in appositional alignment, and Yin always plays as a metaphysical future or past tense mythic noun, icon. Yin is never real-time, but half past time and half future time, working her karmic grace to keep these two together.
Fr. Time:
Left alone, you cannot yet speak?
Gaia:
Yes, my Romeo, I need both our co-gravitational “Yes to Life” enculturations,
your politically powerful Logos of permacultural history,
and our economically abundant flowing Mythos
of polycultural real-time double-bound Continuous Quality Improvement resolving outcomes.
Our Midway.
Wu-wei.
Co-Tipping Point of perpetually balancing harmonics.
Fr. Time:
You always were the more strategic Win-Win cooperative player.
Sr. Gaia:
Oh, Father, I bet you say that to all the girls, and boys,
but you and I both know and love
our co-arising eco-consciousness
of balanced Win-Win culture.
Professor:
OK. Very good. So first, Fr. Time and Sr. Gaia,
how do you think that game was going?
Any concerns or insights about Win-Lose suboptimization?
Sr. Gaia:
It feels like Yang is too Left-brain dominant,
too competition-default.
I realize it’s Yang’s role to carry the dense, hot, close inhalation side of gravity’s bi-elliptical wave toward the future,
on which this Universe surfs in timeless eternity,
and I value those political and economic qualities and quantities,
forms and functions,
all those verbal dynamic kins of cultural incarnations
that must continue to emerge
for Win-Win outcomes.
Yet, I am terrified of becoming too thin,
too cool and shy,
too absent,
too chaotically dispersed,
dissonant,
despairing,
suffering,
disappearingly absent,
dead inside,
because I do so love this time as Earth.
I hope we can grow more accustomed
to unearthing together,
Logos with Mythos,
science with religion,
permacultural politics and procedures with polycultural outcomes
in bicamerally balanced sight.
Fr. Time:
Wouldn’t know what to add to our full-octave throated soprano’s resonant RNA-fractal ring of life’s four temporal seasons,
folding and unfolding her permacultural development Wisdom,
and culture,
and language of yangish verbs
as yinyin mythic nouns.
Professor:
I followed you right up to the last part.
What is this Yang-verb with Yin-shadowy noun relationship?
Fr. Time:
Like ‘Earth’ is a yin noun
in PolyCultural language,
while ‘unearth’ is a yang verb.
If ‘UnEarth’ were used as a negative-polynomial noun,
then I guess that would be most everything we know nothing about
except perhaps through our imagined thinning,
cooling,
dispersing future wave of not-yet gravitational absorption
into this great revolving wheel
of co-arising co-gravitational
Win-Win Being.
Professor:
Well, thank you Fr. Tim and Sr. Gaia, Namaste.
So far, well done.
Let the Win-Win Game continue,
Time’s receding bilateral wave
greeted by Mythic 3-dimensional future-as-now space,
spinning on our mythic enculturating story of time as space,
gravitation co-arising function
as a 4-fractal RNA-seeded place
with 3-dimensional spatial forms
within each 1-dimensional mythic bicameral NOW
nomial
notch in Time’s evolutionary emergent flow.
Gaia and Fr. Time Are Lovers: True InFormating Scandal
Gaia’s love first embraces Earth’s tribes
who then embrace Her back
through Gaia’s co-redeemer enculturation gift,
pay-it-forward grace of permacultured history,
karma of EarthTribe’s economy,
mutually-parasitic subsidiarity
embracing universally regenerate Host
in political-through-personal empowering solidarity
of EarthTribe’s Eco-Passionate Universal Rights.
She paid the health assurance rent
we’ve been redeeming ever since.
And so it is
that Ego’s love invites EcoEarth’s co-passion,
mutually held holy compassion,
synergy of with for Earth’s co-redemptive Rights
embracing Gaia’s Universal Nest.
Not sure where this climatic
and over-heated story
of bicamerally diastatic love
as balance harmonic octaves
starts,
because love is timeless
in this sense
that it can go forward
only as it has emerged from past
except in bicameral systems,
where love,
as synergetically dynamic time of presence
is perceived and comprehended
as bilaterally unfolding.
For example,
bicameral lungs
autonomically know the difference and sameness
of Yang inhalation formation
and Yin exhalation flowing out frequencies.
As bicameral hearts
autonomically feel the difference and dipolar symmetry
of inflation toward diastatic Yang power
and recession away deep flat-line trending
toward static Yin-aptic Basic Attendance.
As bicameral mind-bodies comprehend
this balancing and permaculturing love story
of Universal Earth
and bilateral Fr. Time 0’Mega Science.
Once upon bilateral time,
Earth Day dawned her Birth of Passion Story,
co-passion story,
passion story,
reading with passive purgative passion
Her co-redemptive narrative
of cooperative
mutual subsidiarity
co-arising messianism.
Asked Earth of her ScienceSun,
“Can you truly love a rock,
or any of those static, sometimes dissonant, objects,
like egocentrism
anthro-centrism
or a steel-grey slate wall?”
No,
love is co-relational,
different than unilateral basic appreciation,
Basic Attendance
emerges love as positive enthymeme.
“How can we attend to love’s co-passion
in absence of its expressed return?
I fear I fade
my climate wilts
for lack of co-redemptive love
within my rightful seasons
of cooperative power
and ecological flow.”
“Your neutral economic science investments
display our true ecological incubator, and not, laboratory vestments.”
Universe’s comprehensive co-gravitating love
emerges now
enthymematic photosynthetic evolutionary compassion,
co-arising co-passion,
eco-consciousness
of Ego’s quintessentially ubiquitous
bicamerally balancing
RNA-syntaxed
sensory timelessness within metaphysicality.
“My children co-redeem.
PassionYang, child for deductively reducing suffering,
PeaceYinYin, instinctive child of kindness,
content
kinship
content-full
mindful,
together, twins of bipolar contention,
dipolar contentment.”
Redeemers,
unlike those returning wealth for health value,
receive a healthy/therapeutic advance
for services to be rendered later,
like paying one’s rent on the first of each day,
and month,
then redeeming that gifting-it-forward investment.
Redemption,
unlike a coincidental exchange,
co-arises a return
for a WinWin pay-it-forward investment.
Yang brings forth political power
for Yin’s ecological economic optimization flow,
as
Yin brings forth full EarthRights logical double-binding co-redemptive flow,
for Yang’s more inclusive political form of wealth: eco-therapeutic health.
Co-passionate peace
dipolar bicamerally harmonizing
with Earth’s full octave fractal form and function,
eternally regenerates
Fr. Time’s spatially econtented informational telus-dance
teleodance of co-intelligence
gazing through 4 equidimensional eco-consciousness seasons.
Gaia and Fr. Time’s permacultural affair
looms their co-redemptive weave
throughout TransMillennial PolyCultural Power.
Note: Provoked by an internal dialogue with Andrew Cohen’s “Evolutionary Enlightenment”, p. 183 (SelectBooks, 2011): “When you literally begin to feel the telos, or [Yang-in and Yin-ex] directionality, of the entire process moving in and through your own nervous system, that is when you directly experience that movement as a [4-dimensional spacetime] vertical impulse in your own [eco]consciousness. You see that where we are headed is never static or predetermined [nor diastatically redetermined]. You awaken to what I sometimes call the ‘radical indeterminacy’ of the [timeless NOW eco-echo] life-process itself. As conditioned and mechanical as much of it might seem, the fact is that in every moment there is the possibility for [organically emergent] novelty. In every moment there is the potential for something new [revolving from something old]. In every moment, there is room for [evolutionary] emergence. That’s the miracle of [positive] evolution [as interior-landscaped, synergetic integrative, unitarian, Beloved revolution with universal outcome of bicameral-balanced eco-consciousness].” Some readers may see my Buckminster Fuller influence in comprehending positively dynamic evolution as synergetic (special case-subset) and love (metaphysical universal-Group Theory of co-arising zero-bilateral-elliptics).
Wild Fire Management
I suspect you are right, that we get confused about the messages Earth gives us about what is optimally and sustainably healthy and inclusive of full diversity, including full-diversity of our anthro-centric neural systems, and degrees and oscillating waves of comparative mind-body health v. pathology.
When we measure the health of our political and economic forest, it would seem confusing and misguided to compare lifespans of the average organism within one forest to those of another, and thereby determine anything germane to comparative diverse “health-robustness” optimization of inter-species cooperative relationships . Although it might be interesting to compare the lifespans of the median organism–but maybe that’s what you meant, because the outcome measures are of trees, which should be about right in terms of the comparative internal diversity of Earth systems, but would be entirely wrong with regard to average lifespan of the entire incarnate biosystem within an ecosystem. We are essentially measuring the robustness of our temporal-Elders with median levels of regenetic-diversity balance in their endosymbiotic information processing and embryonic storage systems.
I think in Permaculture Design we learned that the old dead trees are best cut down and burned for fuel to heat our homes, allowing more room for a nearby medium tree to flourish, grow more robust, or perhaps even two or three trees to share this newly accessible ring of photosynthetic fuel.
What the forest seems to be saying to our “burn management” school of forest management, is to include age diversity in our measure of biosystemic diversity as a positive, and to assess each individual gift of the forest for its highest and best use, rather than trying to micromanage from on high. Facilitating trees of all ages and digestive-breathing diversity of interrelationships is complex, requires considerable listening and discernment, and sitting together, showing up and showing to each other what we need to survive together.
The real measure of robust sustainable health is probably universally inclusive and unitarian-intended diversely welcoming, inviting political/economic environments. With trees and meditators and therapists we call this Basic Attendance, setting aside nutrient/neural-assumptions of cognitive/affective dissonance/pathology.
I suspect that mental health is mind health, and I suspect that our “mind” is not rationally reduced to a synonym for “brain” or even “head.” I further suspect that the combination of economic ecological health and political-private relational anthro-centric health are, for each of us, and for all of us. as cooperative co-mentors of health (because that’s what DNA is positively designed to do, that is DNA/RNA’s vocation, if you will, regeneratively sustainable health), the real-time currency of optimized Continuous Quality Improvement currently emerges, co-arises, as cooperative healthy-wealth care and perpetuation toward future healthy regenerators of all species.
gdill52 