Tag Archives: linguistics

Uncategorized

Fuller Wattage Please!

Alan as Buckminster
delivers Fuller Watts.

Left-Brain partisans of deductive “prickles”
and Right-Brain partisans of inductive “goo”
have reduced their mutually antagonistic arguments
into something resembling a pile of boorish poo.

Prickly Republicans are tough-minded,
rigorous competitors,
precise calculators of economic wealth priorities.

Meanwhile,
Gooey Democrats are tender-minded romanticists
loving wide generalizations
and grand syntheses,
like this one,
so I guess we all know my enculturation history
and gooey ecological health proclivity.

Robert Norton
commends optimizing communication
between Prickly and Gooey,
and all the GooeyPricklies in between,
commence with Zero-Soul enthymemes
of nondual co-arising consciousness.

Similarly,
C. G. Jung
commends optimizing Great Transitional Revolutions
through historical-cultural enantiodromia,
the Tipping Point of co-arising cultural gravitation,
attaining our extreme Left-Brain dominant moment,
points where we begin to turn into its own deduced Midway,
of Left-Right co-arising bilateral consciousness,
that nomials are relational verbs,
coherently binomial
Convexly Yangish Prickle
with Concavely YinYin Goo.

Co-gravitating consciousness is positive polynomial
consciousness of nature’s intelligent in-formation,
confluent awareness,
including comprehension of cognitive/emotive dissonance
as emotional obscuration
is everything else we might know
as eco-identified Prime Zero-Relational
square-rooted fractal Soul.

Co-arising coincidence of experience and knowledge
redeems interdependent purpose-meaning assumptions
as reiteratively enthymematic enantiodromio dipolar syntax
evolves cooperatively confluent eco-normic in-formation forward,
as synergetics predicts and optimizes
coincidental Universal Intelligence outcomes
of inclusive diverse natures,
including PrickleGoo
as Yang/Yin bilaterally balancing space-time,
co-gravitationally comprehensive consciousness.

Relationship says Yes! positive
as double-binding mutual immunity
murmurs not-not yet…

PrickleGoo Co-Arise our Polycultural Revolution,
love your mutual antagonism as mutual self-immunity,
complete our universal unitarian speciating identity
of nature’s zero-soul prime ecto/endo symbiosis.

Ecotherapy is to ecological health
as Ego’s Co-PrickleGoo Balance is to eco-normic wealth.

Standard
Uncategorized

Naked Aquarian Age

Did our Age of Aquarius evaporate,
fail to regenerate,
to resonate,
fall too far short of what our parents
knew we should anticipate?
Free love could not sustain
weak non-violent resolutions against
whatever they were for.

Yet, if love is synergy,
mutual gravity,
and creation is this co-passion’s regenerate transgeneration,
how could love cost more than free?
How could co-redemption not invest everything
in learning how to cooperatively Be,
free of enslaving supremacist becoming,
free to come together as ecological We?

Those who stop to count these costs of love,
look for ways to divest of co-opportunity,
ignoring Earth’s mentoring economy
of light’s photosynthetic comprehensive consciousness,
of neutral’s dark unconsciousness,
a fog bank evaporating as double-binding time and rhythm
pattern and color RNA’s free-fractal love connection.

If Time’s eternal unfolding presence is 0-dimensional,
and Nature’s bicameral perception is 2-dimensional prime,
bicameral form with function,
ego emerging from eco,
yang incarnating double-yin,
reiterative communicative processors
borrow RNA’s decomposing 3-space with 1-time prime bilateral dimensions,
equivalent seasons;

Shy winterish Uracil of Universal freely decomposing love
greets Cytosine’s full summer-formed regeneration,
as objectives greet their past and future subjects;
while Adenine painlessly springs
for Guanine’s lavishly com-posted integrative harvest,
as verbs form fractal-recycling nouns,
verbal con-science revolutions,
relearning Earth’s organic language,
by echoing universal polypathic syntax.

Global monocultural power of governance
becomes a Left-brained dominant and reductive tyrant,
an Emperor reified of clothes
to cool His naked Ego-thirst.
However,
when power remains integral within co-passionate,
climatic,
gravitational integrity,
synergetic uniting cooperatism,
then naked power conjoins dark yin-time-ations,
shy bigendering romantic camouflage,
re-birthing this post-millennial
gift-it-forward
Age of Aquarius.

Standard
Uncategorized

Dr. Time’s Dipolar Rant

What’s up?
Thanks for this second interview,
old man.

You are either blind or confused,
but probably both.

Well, thanks,
and I appreciate you as well.
Now, I understand you want to talk about human consciousness.

We comprehend your language as limiting human consciousness.

Now would that be the royal “we”
or are you assuming something about me
or the entire human race?

Yes, although be careful not to confuse royalty with governance.
Royalty is best democratized for universal
and global
and individual self-governance.
This is the subject of considerable ancient poetry
and wisdom.

OK, well,
how about a wide open question
and then you can just say whatever it is you
or we
want to say about human consciousness?

Was that your wide open question
or am I still waiting for it?

Apparently you are still waiting
because you are continuing to respond to my questions
with questions.

Yes, that’s what I wanted to say about human consciousness.
So, any other questions for me today?

I don’t know how I got myself involved with you again.
You are the most ornery pedantic old fart I have ever met.

I resemble that remark
but it is not what I understand as an “open question.”

What would you like to say about consciousness?

Thank you.
That reminds me of the grand opening of Book 1:
The Character of Tao,
entitled “On The Absolute Tao.”
Let me try a post-millennial transposition
of Laotse’s famous treatise:

Book 1: The Coincidentally DiPolar Character of Time
1. On Absolute Time

The Time that can be spoken
Is not comprehensive time;
The Languages that can be given
Are not fully Polynomial-Real
resonate
resolved Information,
or understanding.

Not-Not Binomiality is the origin of “Universe” and “Earth”;
Language-Logos-Left hemisphere
proposes to the Right-hemispheric Eco-Mother
of Earth’s Universal Solar-Fueled System.
Left speaks ego’s anthrocentric
to Right’s mute eco-centric binomially balanced syntax.

Therefore:
Oftentimes, humans purge themselves of ego’s fear-of-death passion
In order to comprehend Life’s Original Intent;
Oftentimes, Universal Time’s comprehensive consciousness regards human passion,
To rediscover its bilaterally eternal flowing form
from past into this present toward future’s past.

This binomial–yin’s secret future time
with yang’s manifest past time–
is one naturally equivalent bilaterally coincidental cycle;
Yin-Future and Yang-Past are given different names
When human language explains their bilateral manifestation
in the present
as polynomially binomial
“not not yet”
and
“not not now”.

Future “not not yet” with Past Polynomial-Yang empowered Information
we language through Present’s comprehensive consciousness,
Logos-Mythos ReConnection
ReCreation
PermaCultural ReGeneration:
Stretching across Future’s Omega Point
down and into Deeper Ecology
Is the Risk and Opportunity Paradox
of Ego’s optimizing Life within Eco’s Balancing ReBirthing Death.

Wow, that sounds really deep Dr. Time
but some of us are really busy trying to get through our day
so if you’re done
I’ll submit this
but don’t expect too much by way of positive outcome
cause that was really out there in the effectiveness department.

You sound disappointed.

Let’s just agree that comprehensive consciousness
seems to lack sufficient informational articulation
to change how I feel about you,
for example.

I suppose that’s why we call it “comprehensive.”
So, let’s try redirecting fear about future deaths
and anger about past deaths
by including both ourselves and our environment
discovering what anger at,
fear about,
oneself can teach
our present consciousness.

What does your present conscience show you
about your justified anger at others,
past events,
society,
significant others;
what does fear about others,
and your future,
teach you about love and kindness
needed for yourself AND
these others,
together,
as a coincidentally correlated relationship through time?

When future-fear and past-anger say
“I don’t have time for you.”
future-love and past-kindness coincidentally say
“I regret not having enough time for us.”

When past-anger says
“I don’t have enough time for me.”
future-love and past-kindness also say
“I regret not having enough time for me
to be with eco-us,
universal-us,
governance-us,
to invest in more comprehensive consciousness,
universal intelligence,
to “sit with the world,”
to re-create,
to co-create,
to co-incidate,
to Right-eco-recenter my Left-ego-identity.”

When love and kindness say
“I have time for you”
future-fear and past-anger are also saying,
“I regret not having enough time for egocentrism.”
but,
future-love and past-kindness only speak within languaged consciousness
when present-tensing time is consciously dominant,
just as future-fear and past-anger only speak
with future and past tense timing dominance.

Anger about past relationships
transactional events within coincidental time,
is also fear about replication within future’s coincidental space
of present-tense comprehensive consciousness.

I’m feeling dizzy and light-headed.

You are dizzy and light-headed.

I just said that.

Binomially eternal time recycles
reiterates
religioning revolutionary
and enlightening intuitive dipolar headed,
as ego turns to fly home to Right-brain centric embrace
bilateral time regains this human race’s natural pace.

Too many words.

That’s OK.
His royal commissioner accused Mozart of too many notes.
Both history and culture had their timely response.
Mozart still sings and dances
because he did not listen to repressive governance messages.

Too many notes, I’ll never get this submitted in time.

Well, time doesn’t wait,
but it doesn’t leave any faster than it arrives.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

So, Why Is It…?

Why is it:

we plant gardens
but we garden plants?

we call natural medicines drugs
and we call unnaturally produced drugs medicines?

we label our disease-hypnotized industrial-insurance complex
as our “health care system”?

we prefer fetal alcohol syndrome, pickled livers, and dead drunk outcomes
to THC induced probable failure to ever develop yet another over-yanged Type A personality,
with an antisocial proclivity for sprouting pickled livers and other deadly outcomes?

we tend to respond to uninvited Type B personality invitations
with Type A fully-alert personalities,
yet we respond to uninvited Type A demands
with Type B laissez-faire, neglect, and cognitively buzzed dissonance?

the older our nation grows
the younger our culture appears to prefer?

we pay more and more to elect politicians
who produce positive policy priorities and outcomes less and less?

the louder and longer I persist in persuading you of my wisdom
the shorter and softer grows your attention span
and capacity to hear me?

we produce prodigious amounts of dispossession destined for the trash
yet we seldom intend to ever possess and take ownership of our future trash?

economists respond to something called ecologic
as if their home eco turf were some alien craziness?

domineering competitive Business As Usuals
fail to see they are a sustainable cooperative economy’s
most significant mentor for disinvestment,
and design and development priorities?

every climaxing polyculture produces a master permaculturalist,
but not every master permaculturalist
has ever produced a long-term, sustainable-optimization-of-life-systems
polyculture?

we seldom have enough time to notice and appreciate new places and faces
but we drag through ponderous time invested in the same ol’, same ol’ faces
and spaces?

every meme has its own elitist establishment paradigm
but super-paradigm is not a meme?

if some communication event between two people
is called a transaction
then we think “economics,”
but if some communication event between two non-human systems
is called a relationship
then we think “ecosystem”?

that analogy is to logic
as ecology is to logic
but ecological arguments
are culturally dismissed as “merely analogical”?

that digital information is always binary
but polynomial information is not assumed to also flow binomially balanced,
like +1 = (-,-)0,
as Yang-Space = Yin/Yin Time,
as Left-brain dominant econormics = Right-brain double-binding ecosystems?

we temporally garden spatial rooted plants
and we spatially plant co-evolving rooted gardens?

Standard
Uncategorized

When Poets Rule the Nest

Everything that is created
disguises a hidden purpose….
A calligrapher writes out his lines
not just for the exquisiteness of the script
but to also convey a meaning.
Rumi (M. Mafi, trans.)

What is the purpose of poetry,
and therefore the meaning of the poet?
Refined prose?
Beautifully flowing style and structure?
Artistic elegance
or the beauty of its truth?

Is poetic purpose the meaning of its language
or the art of linguistic choices?

Of course it must be both,
symbiotically fertilizing and farming each incubating embryo,
functioning and forming, creating and cultivating, regenerate language,
an expression of intuited deduction,
refinement toward exegetically known and felt soul-truth
through eisegetical analogy
ecology
economy of linguistic order, transactions, relationships,
principles of languaged left-brained human nature
dancing prancing functional flow and forms
through right-brained proportional memory encryption
regeneratively intuited octave polycultured memory,
dream-dancing DNA, team-mentoring within each of life’s cells.

What evolves and seeds
plants and pulls
harvests and winnows language,
forms and functions flowing fine flowering frequencies of thought,
understanding and learning?
What comprehends and mentors holistic orthopraxis,
ecotherapy and healing, within and without,
rational and polypathic sanity?

This optimally sustaining
revolutionary bipolar wealth of healthy meaning
for graceful living
and breathing robust prose and language
and healing poetry,
enculturates as metaphysically expressed
through universal laws of language
and cooperative economics of consciousness and mental health,
trans-actively mutual mentoring love,
as words teach us what we think
and thoughts inspire our Way (Tao)
toward optimally inclusive expression.
Meanwhile poetry evolves physically incarnating
through global dancing and singing
in full octave ringing circles
of energy and organic-spiral dynamic mass,
coincident co-arising communion.

Poets conduct dancing lyrics of life through death,
decompositioning regeneration.

Poets prehend self-governance structures
in ways of light more enlightened
than competing partisan pedantry;
which may not be saying much for poets.

Transliterating Laotse on “Rulers”:
Of the best public administrators
The people only have faith,
prehend, that they exist,
or did way back in the day;
The next best they love and praise:
the comprehensively wise polypaths
with CQI regenerative well-being outcomes.
The abusive and tyrannical next they fear;
powerful fools.
And the neglectful next they revile and ridicule;
weak and humorless fools.

When poets do not command the people’s faith,
Some will lose faith in them,
And then they resort to oaths!
But, of the best,
those wisely compassionate cooperative poetic-rulers,
when their outcomes are optimally accomplished,
their full-octaved permacultural design word work done,
The folks all remark,
“We have written and told and danced,
lived and breathed,
colored and cultured it ourselves.”

It is no more or less feasible
to have a mutually subsidiary
and cooperative design and development
sociopathic CEO,
than it is to find a wise and holy
competitive hoarder of wealth and power.

Everything that is created
disguises a hidden purpose.

Creation disguises,
yet implies,
teleology as ecologic.

Standard
Uncategorized

Rhythmic Rainbow Revolution

Memory of past,

imagination of mirrored future,

evolve dipolar fractally

and octave binomially

functional form,

informed,

encoded, and therefore neurally decoding,

reconnecting from past to future to past

implicate ordered language and relationships,

numeric-iconic transliterative across universal paradigms,

transformatively intuited,

transcendently linguistic,

transductive integrity of right and left ellipticals

eco-metaphysical and ego-physical octave waving

multisystemic regenesis

of full color harmonies and patient orthopraxis temperaments,

 

Redeeming peace,

time as reiterating development of mindfulness,

eco-ethics and coincidental mentoring evolution,

ecologic

economics

eco-id-entity

Earth Justice

echoing resonant informing

dipolar function and form

balanced Yin with Yang,

Not Polynomial (-)(-) boundaries and margins balancing Polynomial (+) spacetime,

double-bound temporal-aptic neural strings

of resonant ergodic calculation,

rational trigonomies,

fractally holonic geometrics,

permaculturing crystal-roots

resonating Life’s reverse-hierarchic Tree.

 

Eco-nutritional harmonic roots produce eco-rainbowed metric rhythms,

produce eco-nutritional harmonic roots…

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

On the evolution of logical paradigms

Excerpted from Dr. Taowls History of Logistics Class

 

At least since early research in systems theory, as applied to natural and linguistic systems of regeneration and decay, by names such as Whitehead, Bateson, Kuhn, B. Fuller, and Bohm, a fractal-crystal development structure for optimizing diastatic integrity has emerged in a fairly long polymorphic column of logical and logos paradigms. We will spend some time looking at fractal and prime dipolar relationships in:

biology,

geology,

neurology (aptic v. synaptic),

psychology (Right v. Left hemispheric dominance),

pathology,

numerology (especially digital-binary),

geneology,

mythology,

teleology,

theology,

logic,

all rooted in human languaged and metric-sequential ecology.

 

Logos has been evolving from ecological roots toward economic branches of regenetic consumption, bearing productive breathing leaves and vocations to produce regenerative fruit, birthing by decomposing seeds, to spring up with new hope for optimal growing seasons during spring through summer.

This ecologically sprouted cooperative economy flourishes best within a richly nutritional compost environment of mutually mentoring, teaching-learning, organic eco-cells of decomposition, responding with gratitude to flirtatious root tendrils, succulent filaments looking for some actively confluent, harmonious love, or synergy.

Commodification of Earth’s regenerative nutrient-normative value system began to emerge with the adolescence of the Western-centric Industrial Age, now concluding. Until this reification of value as capital, value exchanges were primally rooted in the expectation of nutritional merit. This is particularly true if we consider nutrition as germane to all sensory receptors, not just taste and smell, but also audio-visual, and affective-feeling receptors.

Currently, and trans-millennially, we are reweaving our logos strings, coming toward comprehension that information is to energy as flowing time is to thermodynamically balancing space, as economics is to ecologic, as form follows eco-functional (life sustaining) evolution, and holonic-fractal revolutions of seasons and eras, including permaculture design and planning projects, trigonometric prime “Closed Set” functions, Bloom’s deep learning Taxonomy, theologians’ spiritual, and perhaps alchemical, four-seasons of winter’s enthymematic purgation (metta), spring’s hope (karam), summer maturation’s positive developing faith (mudita), culminating in autumn’s fruitful harvest (it was the Messiah who said “by their fruits you will know their nutritional value, or lack thereof”) , optimizing annual uppekkha outcomes by winnowing, selecting, and regenerating compost compressed with Elders’ seeds, leaves, nutrients hibernating in advent of this Great ReGenesis Transition Millennium, rediscovering Right and Left hemispheric teleological balance, as digitally and binary balanced in (-)/(-) = NotPolynomial Information = (+)Polynomial[dipolar correlate] spacetime energetic, dynamic information. Confluent information is co-incidental, as contrasted with dissonant noise, and may be defined as +ergodic/spatial metric balance equivalent (=) to (-)ionic/temporal electromagnetic balancing induction. So, a positron is coincidentally synergetic with a double-negative neutron, which atomically outlines an internal, concave, fractal-ionic elliptical wavilinear in/exforming string. But, that all heads off toward theoretical physics and Thurston and Perelman and Group Theory, which grows intentionally removed from history and her awkwardly less smooth-structured evolution.

We each have a choice as we compare paradigms. It has become urgent for thorough research to explore both sides of this choice. Not only diversities of specialized information within distinct paradigmatic frames, but also our mutually coincident confluence between and among these diverse logos-logic branches on our human linguistic left-brained Tree of Ecological Life.

As we further comprehend that it is not really a new string or new economy we seek on our globally regenerative vocation, we will more cooperatively recognize and appreciate that we all follow one permacultured ecological paradigm as it traverses the great cranial-spinal divide, originating with Elder RNA Codexed intuitive memory, then emergent Left-brain dominance, and now Trim Tabbing back toward Left-Right hemispheric dipolar balance; eco-logic resolves from theo-logosed early bicamerality (see Julian Jaynes on the ethological development of Left-brained cultural-linguistic dominance of deductive reasoning and metric calculation, as icons shifted to linguistic symbols) to spread an actively cooperative economy with an endosymbiotic understory of mutually subsidiary power-strengthening optimization strategies, bridging religion with scientific research in what Fuller termed Universal Intelligence.

Fuller’s “Intelligence” is not merely deductive and statically discerned or designed, it also has a regenerative four equivalent fractal-elliptical dimensional structure as incarnated in natural systems. This contrasts with older hard-copy two-dimensional drawings, confusing Yin-Yang closed circular symbols as sufficient for understanding real four-dimensional world economic revolving, wavilinear, double-knotted, universal Prime Relationship of space and time, unfolding, enfolding within human speciated memory, refolding; DNA and Yang’s RNA Elder ReGenetic Codex written within dynamic space and place as Whole Universal Binomial Intelligence, all the way down to QBit sub-atomic holonic Commons harmony.

Our humane permacultural vocation optimizes rich polycultural Climax Communities of inclusive and diverse information, nutrient values, organic networks, each an integral multisystemic therapeutic project to minimize stress and dissonance by optimizing our full-harmony opera.

Legend has it that this resolutionary process all culminates when the Fat Queen sings.

Hmmm….

Why are you all looking at me, I wasn’t singing out loud again was I?

Standard
Uncategorized

Basic Multisystemic Compassion

As I approached David Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order I anticipated easy resonance with his philosophy, but was concerned I would be lost in his symbolic math. I had no idea that he had any interest in language or anything that might approach a meta-philosophy of linguistics.

I probably don’t understand enough of this to even successfully explain why it feels so compelling to me, much less why I hope it will be compelling to you. Even so, let me set the stage for his rheomode chapter with a few sentences that grabbed me.

 

…in the present inquiry the rheomode will be concerned mainly with questions having to do with the broad and deep implications of our overall world views which now tend to be raised largely in the study of philosophy, psychology, art, science and mathematics, but especially in the study of thought and language themselves…. …the dominant form of subject-verb-object tends continually to lead to fragmentation, and it is evident that the attempt to avoid this fragmentation by skillful use of other features of the language can work only in a limited way, for, by force of habit, we tend sooner or later, especially in broad questions concerning our overall world views, to fall unwittingly into the fragmentary mode of functioning implied by the basic structure. The reason for this is not only that the subject-verb-object form of the language is continually implying an inappropriate division between things but even more, that the ordinary mode of language tends very strongly to take its own function for granted,… …because the ordinary mode of thought and language does not properly call attention to its own function, this latter seems to arise in a reality independent of thought and language so that the divisions implied in the language structure are then projected, as if they were fragments, corresponding to actual breaks in ‘what is’. (pp 39-40)

 

Bohm chooses rheo because it means “flow”; so he sees rheomode language structure as flowmodal. For reasons that I hope to support as we go along, I believe Bohm’s rheomode may translate effectively as “ecological.”

My first question has to do with how universally true is this “subject-verb-object” fragmentation of language. Here Bohm speaks of its ubiquitous culturally fragmenting effect especially when discussing things that are Whole Systemic like universal principles and nature and spirituality, dogma and metaphysics. But is it true that nouns always act as static nomials and verbs take all the dynamic action in all languages, is there a linguistic cultural divide in this respect between more Eastern enculturated language, as compared to Western encultured language? Is this as true in aboriginal, unwritten languages, as of post-industrial evolving language? Are there possibly ethological linguistic trends that might distinguish between Northern and Southern hemispheres, germane to this tripartite distinction between progenitive/subject-generative/verb-regeneration/object linguistic functions?

Regardless, Bohm’s ecological rheomode concentrates full language attention on holistic implications of verbs, language as iconic of process, change, development as well as implicating stasis, solidarity, and unraveling. Verbs, verbals, have this binomial function, dialectical form of explicit thesis-function and implied antithesis-appositive dysfunction. Dynamic linguistic function is diametric, binomial analogically and, therefore, binary-balanced digitally. Perhaps analogical information is to binary-coded polynomial information as digital information is to bionically-encoded language-pattern.

Bohm processes us through a 7-stage unfolding of basic verbal bionic function. Language evolves essentially bionic because it grows through a prime relationship between Self (ego) and Other (eco/echo/reiterating environmental input). Self is my information processor, receiving both Interior Landscape (B. Fuller’s Metaphysical Constant Concave Universe) and Exterior Landscape (Fuller’s Physical Convex Universe) messages. Both categories of messages are linguistically articulated only in our left hemispheres. Both categories of messages are temporally-neurally aptic/synaptic affectively received and fractally (4-based logical metric system) co-prehended, intuited, predicated, encoded, implicating memories resonant with RNA/DNA encrypted double-elliptical plasmatic fold/flow/force patterns, defaulting to retain ionic, and bionic, balance.

Just as it is not possible to have a “true” information system that is not binary-balanced, it is not true information that is not binomially structured, with a positive polynomial +form-function that is negatively dipolar correlated with –(-) polynomial equivalently ionic disbalancing chaotic dissonance; an implicit intuited antithesis completing the 100% truth value of each language space-time event. Cognitive awareness, and therefore the development of expressive language, and word choice, is an enthymematic dialogue between right brain’s natural systemic design and development experience, and left brain’s eisegetical hypothesis that what ego’s senses are absorbing remains normatively confluent with our prior unfolding of time encultured memory network.

For now, I want to narrow Bohm’s 7-stage (open-ended octave) taxonomy of  nomials into what appear to me to be the more primal 4-base stages. He analyzes several words as rheomodes. We will use his analytical structure for additional words:

Form

Reform—to form again; spatial dimensions+=+, temporal linear dimension (-)before=(+)now

Reformant [reforming, reform-ionic]—is formant in this now, so choice of form is functionally “Truing”

Irreformant [negative reform-ionic]—is not formed now, so choice of form is functionally “Falsing”

 

When I replace reform with inform, then it becomes easier for me to see not-informant as dissonance, noise, the reception of a message without nutriently redeeming value; lack of confluence, absence of a good as well as absence of truth at this time.

Generate

Regenerate—to conceive again

Regenerant—regenerating now, truing confluent with encoded experience

Irregenerant—negative degenerating-ionic, generative trend is falsing, out of formative and functional potentiating balance.

Nature

Renature—to incarnate, an incarnational linear-string identity of historical continuity

Renaturant—confluent syncing with internal right brain true/good natural experience

Irrenaturant—dissonating from natural systemic order

 

For me, although apparently not for Bohm himself, the logic implied within these fractal forms becomes more transparent if I use co or eco where Bohm uses re and rheo; these are essentially binomially-fractal flow rhythms and patterns of logic and ecologic.

SINE                           (enthymematic +e = +c-function) Uracil = winter permacultural language

COSINE                     right-temporal-only Interior prehension +e-functionally confluent

Cytosine= spring as positive ecocentric hope permacultural logos/logic

Positive [Adonine] + Negative [Guanine] confluent/dissonant neural memory/random-chaos LTR trend-analysis

= regenerating flow-fractal RESOLUTION: SINE equivalently eco-logic, temporally coded function

 

I realize these thoughts have taken some bold analogical leaps, but I believe that if we embrace the basic prime fractal relationship between Interior Landscape’s right-brain dominant ecologic as a reverse corollary of the Exterior Landscape’s left-brain dominant logic, we can uncover empirical, scientific, deductively sequential, logical, rational, as well as good and beautiful and regenetically effective evidence that cognitive dissonance is what happens when co-incidention does not. In other words, we can only cognize as true and logical, right and fair and just, beautiful and good, graced karma what does not cause chaotic temporal-neural flow chaos between our right and left dominant co-incidental pattern and rhythm code memory, within our amazingly binomial information processing DNA speciated brains.

Both psychological and physical/geometric/biometric evidence combine as I comparatively analyze Buckminster Fuller’s Synergetics, Julian Jaynes’ ethological cultural analysis of the left-brain’s evolution of language (The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind). Jaynes’ conjectures have only been further supported by subsequent split-brain research. However, his choice of “breakdown” was important for his historical interest in the evolutionary relationship between consciousness and identity, and, if he were rewriting for a post-millennial audience, he would probably invest rather more ink in our bicameral buildup of right-left equi-valent permacultural balancing trends. That said, his historical evolutionary analysis remains germane for noticing this fractal flow-trend within language and ecological economies of natural systemic value, virtue, nutrition, medicine, health, mental health, power, function, form, information, and ionic/bionic ergetic frequencies.

I find natural (inclusive of human natural) fractals as deeply embedded in our Interior Landscape as Buckminster Fuller, Gregory Bateson, Guy Murchie, and others find within Earth’s, even the Universe’s, natural design and development stages and frequencies and forms. So much so that analogical fractals and polymorphic fractals resolve as ecological and logical regenerative Prime Relationship Fractal Systems.

Some more developmental-fractal eco-nomials that I have included in an article for the Community Development Association:

Comparing synergetic organic paradigms, the unfolding economy of love (Fuller mentioned love as a synonym for how he understood the action of synergy) and seasoned integrity, perhaps wisdom, becomes analogous with Fuller’s fractal unfolding of Universal Intelligence.

Permaculture                           Positive Affect             Learning                      Seasonal Metaphor    

Decompose form/function        Attend/Presence           Notice/Apprehend        Winter/Advent 

Consume function                    Hope?                          Question/Doubt                       Spring

Produce form                           Faith!                           Understand                  Summer

Regenerate information                       Love/Peace…               Comprehend[1]               Fall/Harvest

Regenerative systemic process follows a redemptive economic cycle, in which we intend to “buy back,” reinvest in those outcomes with the best sustained yield-value and least risk of over-unbalancing-investment. Risk aversion itself seems to recommend becoming as cooperatively self-invested as environmental circumstances allow, as a first-tier priority for OCQI yield development. Self-redemptive economies lead to mutually-(co)redemptive economies, lead to self-regenerating Climax Community development, into perpetuity, or permaculturally.

I suspect there may be profound implications for merging linguistic and nutritional health paradigms. For example, I am aware of two psychotherapeutic models rooted in Buddhist philosophy: dialectical behavior and compassionate. They each have their strengths and they are not in any way dissonant with each other. Their primary distinction may be their point of original linguistic perspective. Dialectical behavior therapy comprehends self-identity within a fundamentally Thesis v Antithesis logos/language intellectual and feeling environment. Here we are encouraged to balance our grasping instincts with our immune-aversive instincts. Compassion therapy begins with a Basic Attendance Self-EcoEnvironmentally co-passionate mutual mentoring enthymematic hypothesis, which implies an equivalent +/(-) binomial Thesis/Antithesis Zen Vortex of mindful potential. Compassionate awareness, or love, or synergy, becomes the synergetic holonic balancing of +Thesis-ego-identity with –(-)Antithesis-bionic economical individuation. Mutually appreciated therapeutic benefits now, and anticipated for the future, is what sustains healthy interdependent minds, communication, relationships, intentional communities.

Switching to a Taoist frame, where I have more familiarity and linguistic comfort, this Positive Teleological self-identity information string, following the regenerative evolutionary and revolutionary trends of enculturing history, is the  convex force/form-power/solidarity of Yang; regeneratively completed and dialectically-binomially-economically cooperatively and mutually balanced by concave flow/function-dipolar reflective subsidiarity of co-incidentally reverse proportioning/distortioning/torquing/wavilinear/individuation unraveling Yin’s bi-functional role within Yang-quantic, or ionic, identity. Regenerative Tao balancing trends may be temporally viewed as Yin-prescient to Yang’s linguistic self-consciousness moment, as well as coincidentally wavilinear within each regenerative trending primal event-moment relationship.

Within binary information systems this seems to translate into +1.00% Polynomial information is temporally-linearly equivalent covalent with (+/-)0 QBit Polynomial Bayesian analysis trends.

Why do I think you would care about this?

Perhaps because I read Laura Brown’s feminist psychotherapy work (Subversive Dialogues) before I ran into Compassion Therapy, and something going viral that I think is called Health Home, I have trouble seeing any difference in how they describe an optimally therapeutic linguistic, or rhetorical, or dialectic/dialogical multisystemic environment. When I began my current journey toward verbally and sometimes nonverbally silencing my aversion to what I don’t find compelling in my Oppositionally Disordered daughter, and, instead actively looking for ways to appreciate her Positive functionality, reinforcing and growing her strengths and assets, assuming her screechy-scratchy dissonance has a positive-functional ethological evolutionary role for her, and for our relationship, then I find myself enjoying her more, and she appears to enjoy me more.

 

Anyway, I have certainly not done justice to the linguistic potential you might find in David Bohm’s rheomode, whether it works as a synonym for ecological flow function for you or not. Unfortunately, like Buckminster Fuller, he was an even worse writer than am I. It is easy to get lost in our long, complex strings of interactively dynamic analogies. This, however, is an unfortunate communication challenge for those with a polypathic way of using our nutrient-absorbing sensory receptors. Something I intuit that we might share, or you would not still be reading this.

[1] All systems are subject to comprehension, and their mathematical integrity…and trigonometric interfunctioning can be coped with by systematic [eco]logic. (Fuller, 1975, p. 97) The fourness of self and the fourness of otherness = [binomial and bionic] comprehension. (Fuller, 1979, p. 49)

Standard