Tag Archives: discernment

Uncategorized

Presidential Cooperative Discernment

This is a revision of an older title, “Presidential Webinar.” It includes those questions that I would hope the growing global  cooperative sector, including food cooperative justice advocates and Permaculture Designers,  would expect our state and national candidates for office to be capable of answering with some level of integrity and basic comprehension:

 

Moderator:  Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the first on-line webinar Presidential Debate, sponsored by our good friends at http://www.ebay.com, the people who know all about selling your stuff to the highest bidder.

Tonight you may submit your questions via email or text as early as possible, if you have not already done so. These are currently being collated for redundancy of interest, and combined into the most frequently co-arising issues emerging from real-time on-line participants.

Our candidates tonight are Senator Bland, the Business-As-Usual Party’s nominee and Senator Farmer, nominated by the new Polyculture Party, restructured from what was the Democratic Party, with the motto, “We sync polyculture with party.”

Our first question is forming right now through our bicamerally networked uracil/cytosine bionic mainframe (0)-centric “placeholder” in-formation system, designed by our good friends at http://www.apple.com, “If you seek binomially, bilaterally, bicamerally balanced intelligence, have you looked inside a symmetrically regenerative apple?”

This first question will go to Senator Bland, and then to Senator Farmer.

The current status of our crowd-sourced question is:

“Senators, you have presented yourselves as candidates for future professional public service, to include CEO responsibilities for our nation’s economic investments and disinvestments to secure the future well-being of our children, and their children and grandchildren. We are asking not only for our biological children but also our biological cousins, all DNA and even RNA-fueled living systems are part of our extended family tree expecting your wisest, highest and best investment for our interdependent health, well-being, happiness, contentment, and social security, assurance, and insurance.”

“What percentage of your own personal investments lies within our cooperatively structured ownership, responsibility, and authority locally based, eco-justice businesses, industries, residences, nourishing the emerging cooperative vocational employment sector; and how much is invested in competitive Win-Lose financial suboptimizing outcome assumptions, with their concomitant tendency to produce inordinate toxic byproducts, including uncooperative working and discernment and empowerment environments for underpaid and undervalued workers, dispossessed with less consideration than might be expected for any other form of abortion of life’s rich potential? We ask about your own integrity of practice because many of us feel that our national political culture assumes we are an over-populated herd of cattle on our way to inevitable slaughter, once we have eaten up our commodified and domesticated value, especially with violently competitive busyness of post-industrial era Lose-Lose corporate decisions to invest our kids, progeny, our futures and commodities, our goods and bads and services and diservices, in bullying  and killing each other, along with any other species that happens to explode as collateral damage.”

Senator Bland? Where are you invested local-cooperatively v. competitively. It sounds like “cooperative” is being defined as defaulting to a Win-Win “both-and” logistical stream, rather than a Win-Lose, “either-or” assumption, with an investment priority option favoring geographical proximity.

Senator Bland: I’m so glad for this question. As you know, my family has been invested in public service since before God was born. I actually came out of my Momma’s chute, a Cuban refugee, singing “The Star-Spangled Banner” in four-part English-only harmony. So, I am 100% invested in USA economic growth.

As for personal investments, as you know, those have all been turned over to a blind trust so I have no idea who is killing or beating whom or what or why with my money, but I am sure that disinvestments of that sort follow the bottom line: if you have to lose, lose next year, and certainly not during the present quarter, and not on my watch.

After all, I could hardly be here representing the Business-As-Usual Party if I thought my investments were following some alternative, suspiciously socialistic, economic agenda.

Moderator: Thank you, Senator Bland, for that uncharacteristically succinct, and somewhat on-topic response, however uninformative and benighted it might have been. Senator Farmer, cooperative v. competitive proportional comparison of your personal financial  investment experience is our active, actual, real-time question for you.

Senator Farmer: I’m an organic farmer. My farm is part of a cooperative network growing, cooking, preserving, weaving, recycling, networking, investing in, and employing, a wide variety of people, food, fiber and other natural re-construction products and services.

When I have more income than needed to reinvest in farming co-operations, I put it in a self-directed IRA, administered by a local cooperative Credit Union, loaning no-interest money for other worker-owned businesses, resident-owned housing development, and cooperative networking services.

All my insurance investments go to a local cooperative self-insurance fund, including property, life, and health insurance. Here also, any money our collective social insurance fund doesn’t need to pay claims, worker-co-owner staff, and other operating expenses, is invested through the cooperative no-interest Credit Union.

My utility bill payments all support cooperatively owned and managed group purchasing guilds fueled by renewable energy sources.

If you are not yet a member of the Polyculture Party, you might not realize that, like all polycultural communities and guilds, our natural business-as-usual practice is Win-Win cooperative. This is an organically essential attribute of regenerative capacity to sustain the positive evolution of interdependent life.

When the power of competitive self-marketing exceeds the monocuture’s Business As Usual tolerance levels for failure to thrive, inclusive diversity, so some survivalist-mode, overcrowded people and other species begin to wilt and fade, then we are living within a fading polycultural environment, on its way toward becoming a formerly over-populated, passive-aggressive, sometimes rabidly expressed, polarized and cannibalistic-suicidal monoculture (sometimes referred to as “Business As Usual”).

Moderator: Thank you Senator Farmer for your cooperation with our time constraints, and sticking with the issue at hand. (Very refreshing and organic indeed!)

Now for a second question:

“Every four years we endure this passion-play liturgy called the “Presidential Election”, but the drop in political effectiveness return seems to negatively correlate with the alarming rate of our skyrocketing collective campaign investment dollars. This is the worst of two worlds, run-away political depression with run-away economic inflation.”

“Why should we continue investing in this system, or would you support political system reform that might reverse this trend? If so, what would you change and why?”

This time Senator Farmer, you are first responder. Is it time for system reform to recover cooperaive political and economic balance, or do you see some hope in staying the course?

Senator Farmer: No, “staying the course” is the other Party.

The Polyculture Cooperative Party emerged at this time because of a revolutionary consensus that now is the time to re-organize our political and economic structures in a more ecologically balanced way.

In nature, there are forms of cooperative governance systems that include (1) some element of challenge thresholds, (2) these are endosymbiotically regulated; (3) we do not find predominate competition within a healthy organism; (4) we call these tumors and cancers and blight of over-commodified monocultures, with lack of healthy co-relationships, “fat deposits”. These are monopolistic power systems in the process of failing as Left-brain dominant systems.

So, what do we suggest? A number of ideas are on the table. perhaps the most important consensus is that we need to increase the accessibility and diversity of our listening and public discernment capacity at a more multiculturally inclusive table–perhaps by removing the word “debate” from public discourse. We need more pubic forums for discernment, not debate. Debate already buys into Win-Lose outcomes. Discernment retains faith in polycultural Win-Win resolutions and resonance. Evolution is a discernment process, not a ‘winner takes all” debate.

Fear-mongering, creating and reinforcing a culture of unreasonable doubt about our co-parasitic Golden Rule, steps into the long-term disintegration of debate, a polemic of rhetoric that continues to lose our future to a monopolistically trending and anthropocentric elite. Continuing this debate as something less than an opportunity for mutual listening and absorption of shared ecological healthy values and nutrients is to concede defeat of a polycultural platform.

Continuing with the Business-As-Usual Platform results in a pyric victory, at best. We have created an over-commodified identification of power with value, resulting in a Goliath Culture that is not so secretly in love with the more co-redemptive and cooperative, more flexible and purposeful, more lovely and graceful Beloved Community. Polyculturing Co-Operatives are a natural revolutionary response to Business-As-Usual Debaters and Haters and Gamers, overly invested in Win-Lose assumptions.

Moderator: Well, you are out of time, so let’s quickly turn to Senator Bland’s response.

Senator Bland: Well, if you are expecting me to huff and puff until I blow your platform down, I guess maybe that’s kinda right.

I tire of wishy-washy weakness and “can’t we all just get along” non-violent diversity mongering. I applaud the Polyculturists’ love of peace but not at the cost of absorbing an injustice for those who enjoy and benefit from Business As Usual. While this may seem difficult for the Senator from Organic America to appreciate, Business As Usuals are people with dignity and rights to own and live with freedom and fairness to the status quo of history as it inevitably stands today.

It’s not colorful enough, but we are who we have become by growing mountains of wealth and power deposits, not by flowing to the lowest common denominator like water.

Moderator: OK, well then, we have time for each of you to wrap up with final thoughts. Perhaps that’s what you just said, Senator Bland, but now is your moment; if you have anything to add.

Senator Bland: Perhaps my opponent and I agree that Business As Usual is rooted in a scientific and cultural view of evolution, progress, purpose and meaning carved out of nature’s survival of the fittest, strongest, richest, most powerful, most mendaciously clever and calculating. We do not claim to be the Messiah, and if you want to vote for those who would save you from yourselves, then you do not want to vote for me.

I hope you believe, as I do, that our best operational strategy is to optimize our strengths, even if these are not yours because they have been purchased by others before you, to fulfill our full-powered human potential as a society, rather than cater to the parasitic weaknesses of others. Evolution teaches that parasitic others’ gain could become the current Host’s loss. We believe in continuing to protect and defend a strong American hosted economy of freedom and liberty for all, relativistically speaking, of course. Those who are poor in political freedom and economic liberty to compete with level-cooperative-field access will always be with those of us residing in more momentous and substantial terrain.

Thank you very much for hosting this important forum for our future continued strength. God Bless America!

Finally, in case anyone doubts my commitment to the future of your kids,

“I pledge allegiance to the U.S. of America flag, and to the holy Republic for which it stands (desite our so-called “fat deposits.” One Nation, God’s liberty and justice for all.”

Moderator: Thank you, Senator Bland for that opportunity to stretch my legs and notice that you left out an important word. Senator Farmer, you have the last word.

Senator Farmer: I guess the Senator didn’t finish his Darwin.

From my soon-to-be-released systematic teleological book, “Incubating Permacultured Seeds and Political-Economic Embryos”:

While endosymbiotic evolution,
indigenous to any one species,
can devolve to survival of the fittest,
this is most likely in these times
of ecosystemic crisis,
especially problems of monocultural over-population,
resulting in PreTraumaticStress Disorder,
an emotional response to cognitively dissonant
chronic cultural stimuli,
high anxiety plus high dissonance populations
suboptimize their regenerative health
through Win-Lose assumptions
and strategies of more competitive logistics
than co-operative logic.

But,
ectosymbiotic evolution,
exogenous to any one species or tribe
or nation
or religion
or culture
or ecosystem
or biosystem,
supports thrival of the most interdependently balanced,
harmonious relationships,
between organically individuated systems.

Ectosymbiotic and endosymbiotic evolution
are both symbiotic,
but ecto tends to have more revolutionary
and transcendently polycultural regenesis trends.

Symbiosis is synergetics,
default-evolutionary
Positive Systemic Development,
co-operative and co-arising,
negatively correlated (dipolar) with,
dissonance and stress,
eco-centric unbalance,
too Yang-dominant,
competitive over health-wealth issues,
rather than default-co-operative
integrity of synergetic symbiosis.

This is Darwin’s
Cooperative Beloved Community understory,
a plant,
a biosystem
an ecosystem’s
a nation’s or religion’s
or any enculturing system’s
exquisite design of co-arising relationship,
proportional balance co-communication
within and between RNA/DNA-syntax,
speaking in voices of time’s seasonal-reasonal
folding and unfolding;
an understory somehow omitted
by Business As Usual cultural narratives,
scientific academia,
rather than story-tellers
of Darwin’s deep ecology.

Yet, what we too often miss in Darwin’s notes
and drawings,
and life,
are also logical assumptions common to two mathematicians,
Buckminster Fuller and Charles Eisenstein,
prime dissonant double-binding temporal-boundary
between competing dominant cultural economies (proton v negelectron)
is where we choose to draw our line
of neutronic co-gravitational balance,
around us-inside v. “them”outside.

If “us” is only
non-marginalized human success stories
within our nation’s
or religion’s
geometric spacetime boundaries,
then Business As Usual Universalists
intend to defend
this relativistic,
yet overly commodified,
monolithic and monochromatic monoculture,
until this system negentropically wilts
and decomposes
and fades
for lack of fuel, nutrients, health
clean air and water
into confluent absence
(relative, yet still co-gravitationally bilaterally timelessly relational)
of 4-dimensional primal-neural spacetime.

However,
when “refugees”
are also “us,”
if “us” includes all mutually-parasitic eco-subsidiary forms
of RNA/DNA regenerative and organic intelligence,
then we are co-mentoring refuge,
already a Polycultural Party
seeking a more inclusive
diverse
cooperative self-governance economy
together.

Together,
refugees and refuge-providing interdependent parasites
call ourselves “Beloved Community”
and/or Polyculturally Climax Optimization
and Health-Sustenance Symbiotic Guilds,
communities,
gardens,
bio-eco-systems
with nondual co-arising
co-gravitational bicameral landscape design
and metaphysics of health development,
and,
oh yes,
EarthTribal beautiful relationships,
proportional barter transactionalists
and cooperative network developers,
synergists,
lovers,
co-mentoring regenerators.

 

 

Thank you for this opportunity to hear these two helpful questions, which included some interesting commentary and trend analysis as well.

I will close with this post-millennial adaptation of a sonnet by Laotse entitled “Rulers,” or “Governors.”

“Of the best governance

The  polyculturally governed can only have enduring faith that this evolutionary system actually emerges co-arising positive oucomes;

The second best anthrocentric polyculturally governing-mentors they love and praise as wise to value regenerative well-being above all else;

The powerful monopolistic tyrants they fear and revolt against;

And the weakest lack of self-governing integrity they revile and do their best to continue laughing at such blatant hypocrisy.

When governing systems do not command the governed’s faith,

Some permaculturists will merely lose faith

And then later join those in critical revolt!

But, of the polyculturally cooperative best, when their permacultural design and development task is climaxed,

their work is done for years to come,

The cooperatively self-governed congratulate themselves, “We have done it our polycultural selves.”

Standard
Uncategorized

HighBeam ConscienceNest

Love matures,
optimally co-arises,
to fill a vacuum left by former fears
about shortage of time,
sub-optimal outcomes.

High pitch synergy
swells toward Beloved Climax Community
as fears and anger about Here and Now
EarthDay’s lack of fullness…
subside.
As we cooperatively embrace our shortness of time,
our ego’s self-ionizing mortality,
our lack of sufficiency,
our most intimate insufficiency,
our DNA human nature’s elitist immunity from RNA Earth’s nature
and each Other’s veneer of skin and hair as race,
our super-eco identity replaces this void with loving integrity,
trans-active integral potential
full-bright beaming.

Where we have seen and known confusion and discontent,
collective autism as affective hypothermia,
cognitive and ineffective dissonance,
about our lack of love’s belonging,
co-creating Here as Now,
we absorb ourselves as EarthTribe’s Boddhisatva ReGenerators,
Co-Redeemers,
co-arising production with co-retracting consumption,
wisely
truly
economically
ecologically
HereNow all-ready,
each high-beam consciousness moment
within fullness of Time’s repurposing potential.

Love resolves compassionate mindfulness as high-heartedness,
evolves and revolves coincident ego-id-entity,
resonates authentic intelligible feeling,
informs co-intelligence of id and supereco’s DNA
temporal revolving syntactical understory,
as self-identity within SuperEco solidarity,
co-aring coherently refracting humane mortality
becoming holy eternal Being here and now.

CoRedeemer Ego mentors eco-centric comprehension
of affect
effect
intent
orthopraxis,
exquisite bright harmony of this place and this time,
transcending content-rich through dissonant pitch polarities,
cultural competitive mania with autistic co-depressive repression,
reveling our Janus Jaynesian faces to ourselves,
each Other,
internal Right landscape mirroring and absorbing
external Left landscape.

Love is as much co-operating beauty as active wisdom,
being as becoming,
belonging as longing,
and no more or less,
balancing bicameral harmonics.

Co-gravitating time,
co-arising space and place and bodies,
spacetime’s SuperEco
balancing Eastern karma with Western grace,
past incarnate information with future reincarnate function,
meaning engaging teleology’s wealthiest healthiest purpose,
history emerging herstoric permaculturation,
polycultural successes surviving decomposed exformative failures
teaching regenerative design
as holistic ecotherapeutic development.

Love co-arises with beloved co-below root systems;
the only ecologically sustainable coincidence:
internal place high-beam hunting external time,
internal time refolding externally encrypted space
this place of pregnant love’s co-identity.

Standard
Uncategorized

Perfect Love

Perfect love is perfection,
it is rare,
if such love exists at all
it must thrive beyond boundaries of my own experience
either receiving,
or giving.

Could this perfection of synergetic harmony and confluence
we have grown to love as love itself
become discovered in and through another
by anyone other than a person,
a being,
mature and healthy with perfect love?

If love is equivalent to synergy,
as Bucky frequently tipped his ruddered pointer,
then love’s perfection must be nondually comprehended
exclusively in this present moment.
Love remembered can fuel faith
to hope for greater love,
a better grade or quality of synergetic life fuel,
a more confluently harmonic love
for future Beloved Communal Time.

Perfect love co-redeems our inclusively co-operative vocation.
No one of us can experience and flawlessly sustain perfect love
until each being we meet
each day and night we greet,
each minute,
each co-arising event
can be nondually known,
identified,
understood,
comprehended as our perfected ground of live
as love’s co-present evolving meaning,
deductively exclusive of no “other” entity.

We are all in this cooperative love,
this Win-Win Vocational Game,
together.
No one crosses the finish line forever
until we all cross our threshold into cosmological love of ever.
No one can optimally
ultimately
quintessentially “placehold” Zero-identity,
occupy
embody
incarnate co-redeemer perfect love
until this permacultural economic ecology
of co-arising synergy
as cosmological dual-dark Tao balance
resolves globally encultured;
reinserting human rights and justice
within their rightful meadow of nature’s ecological balance
of Yang’s power of mattered Order,
with Yin’s flow of energetic
bionic
ionic Choice of Eco- over Ego-centric,
yet nondually, balanced consciousness;
the end of our Left-brain domination
and self-condemnation to ignorance
of our bicamerally cooperative
DNA/RNA nature’s full-evolving abundance.

Then,
in that Great Transition Day,
now,
within each day,
this perfection of love,
including our perceptions of each Other
as love’s potential incarnate,
will become easier,
less dissonant,
less depressing to contemplate
and know its absence;
human self-hatred’s vast potential for nihilism,
for Win-Lose deductive-dominant entropy,
while Earth’s children sink to their knees
because their elders continued to steal sustainable health from them,
continued to resist our Emperor’s nakedness,
absence of dignity and respect outside embracing self-governance
as Earth’s advocate,
holonic representative,
mutual mentor,
co-arising messiahs and Boddhisatvas.

We are each naked emperors
within our beloved communal Earth Tribe,
our cooperatively natured selves.
Incarnation is not independent ownership of form,
devoid of co-regenerational mentorship of function.

Laotse asks,
Loss of ego identity or possession of goods,
including one’s own interior nutritional plant-body,
which is the greater evil?

Loss of a dualistic,
independently competitive
heroic ego-self,
including imperfections of ignoring our co-redemptive
prime relational ecology
and eco-norms for transactions,
actions,
praxis,
prehension,
relationships,
mutually subsidiary interdependence of ownership
of inclusive health and well-being,
including that dream of redeeming others
from their sins and ignorance,
for those possessions are mine as well,
to share and mentor this permacultural ground
of synergetic love
in each moment
of integrative consciousness.

If money is our eco-social icon
for measuring life’s value and power,
then our shared currency of nutritional health
and beloved well-being
is the prime root 0-soul and sum cooperative Core,
+Vector-Polynomial/(-,-)Dual-Dark Vortex NotNotPolynomial,
for optimizing comprehensive value consciousness.
From this perfectly balancing ground of nondual becoming
we have learned throughout all of Time
to mutually invest in cooperative love,
synergy,
to disinvest away from dissonantly competitive disease.

We are both perfectionists and deceptionists.
Health is our primal barometer
for measuring and valuing and evaluating
which is which.
Synergy revolves our deceptions
into our perfecting reception.
Synergetic global cooperation
is our shared ultra-violet
co-arising revolution.

Perfect love,
like perfect health,
is rare,
and impossible to find and maintain,
much less optimally sustain life’s potentiality,
in isolating co-reductive Win-Lose cultures,
nations,
economies,
paradigms,
metrics,
and theories.

We still have a choice;
let’s return together to the healthier and wealthier one.

Standard
Uncategorized

CoArising Transitions

Who do we invite this me to be today,
here and now planning for our next re-arising era
toward death’s patient resolution,
graceful resonance?

Is there some supermagical meaning
in more recent unfortunate events
capable of reading mystical tea leaves,
the web of palms rooted in life’s soul of Time,
in some way that would tip us toward discarding
memories of subsistence economies,
shortages of value,
insufficient wealth of health,
to transform some new place into nirvana,
a WinWin home for all
with sensory full-consciousness challenges,
suffering,
margiinalization,
poverty,
over-fueled wilting?

What is distinct about your vocation,
embedded in our co-operating mission?

Standard
Uncategorized

Plan A: Cosmological ReGeneration

Evolutionary theories have encultured this Post-Industrial Information Age with species as natural systems of self-regenerative intelligence. This is a level of informational organization, transition, change, multi-regenerational genetics that spans the gap between Buckminster Fuller’s Universal (synergetic) Intelligence, with a cosmological open-systemic frame, and Julian Jaynes’s ethological explanation of a phylogenic development of nondual Left+Right bicamerally dynamic health and harmony, an interior landscaped view of normative information-processing balance. Human nature reflects on self+other nondual co-arising entities, as natural dipolar systems within a cosmological-ecological normative order.

Fuller describes Universal Intelligence as Plan A for an ecological cooperative healthy and well-designed fractally syntaxed (RNA/DNA) Zero-Core Vectoral Physical Universe with an embryonic Vortex concave Metaphysical interior Universe. These two faces of one core double-bound and bilaterally evolving system have appeared in other natural and social science teleological theories of health v. decay and wealth v. purgative death. Research on split brain hemispheres supports a bifurcation of Left brain dominance associated with deductive, Win-Lose labeling assumptions deriving language, differentiating subjects from their interdependently relational objectives; while Right brain is Elder brain, performing more proportional and relational functions of inclusive discernment, without language as labels, although able to access language as functional correlatives, analogy, relationship of This+That, Here+Now. Confluently joining Left-brain’s exterior/convex formative explanation to Right-brain’s interior/concave metaphysical memory, rooted in DNA/RNA temporal-fractally organized codex, is our Interior Landscapes Plan A ecological health-wealth cooperative project. Our collective ReGenesis Project is also a ReExodus co-dependent co-arising of comprehensive consciousness; Fuller’s Universal Intelligence.

David Bohm appears to weigh-in quantum physics as the dia-uni-bi-versive fractal function of linguistic syntax. Plan A’s Implicate Order predicates, predicts, emerges, both internally and externally co-arising Explicating Order. Universe emerges and breathes in, expands explicately, which is implicately expressed, re-membered, nondually encoded, through dipolar apposition, internally submerging and breathing out, prime-relationally balanced across both faces of co-arising consciousness, sequentially synced through equivalent fractal-revolving syntax. Fuller imagined this fractal dynamic as reflecting, reiterating, regenerating a RNA in-formational-energetic revolving template.

Fuller’s interest in “viral” regenerative ethology within nature is often missed as an ecological corollary to his general Synergetics theory of mind, consciousness; his Metaphysical Universe. It did not help his own cultural regenerative potential to have missed Buddhist philosophy. Fuller observes that RNA/DNA’s fractal structure reiterates nondual co-arising intelligent “steerage”; essentially the evolution of a revolutionary genetic moment in time. RNA fuels the intelligence of every living cell.  In this sense, RNA is our Universal Intelligence ProGenitor, optimally co-functioning with double-elliptical dipolar balancing dynamics, like early iconic relationships of “Heavens” and “Earth,” and Yang with Yin, but also, from an ecto-symbiotic perspective, as if standing outside the universe’s, and Earth’s, embryonic function, consistently languaged and encultured as appositional dipolar contrasts, such as up and down, in and out, back and forth, left to right dominant clockwise revolution of time, WesternYang culture to EasternYin culture, western deductive-dominant language evolving from west/east balancing syntax roots, males emerging from female wombs, like cytosine emerging from uracil. Nondual co-arising intelligence, as mentored by ProGenitor RNA, appears to be as ubiquitous as the commodification of time.

Julian Jaynes’ evolutionary theory for the emergence of Left-brain dominant deductive labeling and language development is remarkably confluent with Fuller’s RNA as Plan A Universal Intelligence. The core prime self-optimizing function of Left to Right to Left reiterative dialogue and discernment produces communication strings of nondual co-arising memory and continuity of identity, self v. other consciousness. This capacity to distinguish between self-consciousness, or ego-consciousness, and other-awareness, or eco-consciousness, is, according to Jaynes’ Bicameral thesis, the ethological meaning, purpose, function for the emergence of Left-brain neural form in nondual Human Nature co-arising Bicameral Sapients.

Freud and Jung and Erikson, other psychological dynamic analysts, originally labeled these two prime consciousness functions as “ego” and “superego,” with the id being some form of survivalist RNA throwback, a leftover for whatever could not be explained by the two major parties.  Piaget developed a neural evolutionary theory of human brain/cognitive function development, which has phylogenic parallels  with Erikson’s social-psychological theory of human nature’s healthy maturation, as a symbiotic part of  RNA/DNA-regenerative nature. Putting all that together, perhaps it does not stretch Erikson’s developmental view of human culture to suggest that the U.S. is in the throes of a late-adolescent depression about joining a healthier polycultural world of balanced maturity, heading, should we not kill ourselves first, toward a global culture of wisdom.

We may more easily let go of Left-brain dominance to comprehend-embrace universal polypathic Left-Right balanced consciousness of Ego listening, and gratefully responsive to, SuperEco’s exegetical wisdom about spacetime and the unfolding of time’s natural systems. Jaynes might agree with this reworking of his bicameral evolutionary thesis, and further suggest that we are in the last cultural stages of letting go of false wealth, which has resulted in the under-valuing of health and well-being, and false anthro-centric religiosity, to embrace a deeper balanced confluent ecology of global eco-consciousness.

Why would Plan A evolve a Plan B that would grow dominant through the tools of deductive, reductive anthro-centric labeling and languaging? Perhaps  our First Permacultural Principle is that of RNA’s Thermodynamic Balance through nondual co-arising octave-frequency harmonics. Plan A’s regenerative encryption is to search for synergetic opportunities for co-arising Plan B/A = P/NP binomial = +1/(-)0 binary = +c/(-)c Commons Optimized Natural Enlightenment.

Earth’s Right-brain Plan A coded systemic frequencies evolved cultural-herstorical reinforced regenerate functions. Meanwhile, Left-brain Ego dominance reiteratively reflects, communicates, using confluent Left-Right spiral/fractal “mirror” nondual syntax, comprehending Right brain’s reverse-temporal (NP) consciousness inductive response to Left-brain’s “self” v. “other” experience as “my” nature v. EcoPolyenculturedHealthPower/Flow/Function; just as uracil/thymine when balanced with cytosine, produces universally confluent adenine dipolarly pulsating with synergetic/unitarian guanine.

Polypathic genius is polycultural Plan A intelligence. They co-arise into human consciousness and culture. Plan A sometimes feels alien to anthro-centric normative values and economics. Eco-logic regenerates natural systems through a wider teleological lens, anthro-centrically targeting our highest and best, most sustainable, use, health, well-being, but not within a stand-alone silo, a Win-Lose economic assumption of scarcity and competition with, dispossession of, our natural elders and RNA cousins. Plan B follows a Win-Win economic cooperative trail back to co-arise with Plan A’s regenerative bicameral balance. Our species, like all natural species, is (0) soul-rooted, id-entified, to repair Earth’s skin, nutrient flow of breath and water and peaceful dreams within the double-boundaries of Nature’s Originating Co-Arising Passion Story. EcoUs synergetically cooperate most effectively by hosting locally-scaled endosymbiotic health/wealth challenges that remain within Win-Win ectosymbiotic tolerance double-binding limits, excluding futures with the hubris of distinguishing inclusive health from anthro-wealth, as this imbalance repeatedly demonstrates long-term high risk of catastrophic failure.

Our cosmologically shared cooperative vocation appears to realign, individually and collectively, as a Plan A sapiently conscious species, by dynamically balancing healthy ego-centrism with (0)-sum ecojustice, regenerating, gifting each other, optimally sustainable Beloved Communities. Permaculturists define “Beloved Community” as healthy co-arising climax communion within an ecosystem. Buddhists and Taoists, and all sorts of other traditions throughout the ages, have called this nondualistic meditation and ecotherapeutic praxis.

Plan A: mentor co-arising meditation.

Plan B: Listen to Plan A.

Plan C: Repeat, as needed, toward our co-regenerative full-spectrum revolution.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Dia-Language as Orthopraxis

What are some differences between casual conversation and more discernment-intended dialogue?

Dialogue may be rooted in diapraxis, in turn regeneratively learned through the primal orthopraxis of verbal patterns and rhythms, forms with functions and “right”-pitched frequencies.

Discussion and discernment seem difficult through merely written language symbols, iconic logos, because these words and their patterns emerged from our more richly “meme” composted praxis, practice, incarnation, being and becoming, both our Right and Left hemispheres are diapraxis progenitive.

Spatial and temporal delivered “story-telling” information contextualizes both the purpose of language as objective-nomial symbol-content but also emerges, evolves our shared context of intuited choice intention as verbal, verbed, active, action-becoming communication and information for us within this specific rhetorical context. Word choice, pitch frequencies, rhythm, pattern and flow, alliterative intention, metaphors of action and verb choice each contribute allegorical, analogical Information to our emergent positivist dynamic of language-stringing within this moment’s eco-logic; eco-logos lying both positively intended and enthymematically within dialogue’s continuing invitational potential.

Orthopraxis, as a regenerative replacement for facilitated discernment, derives from “orthopsychiatry,” prophylactic psychiatry concerned especially with incipient mental and behavioral disorders (Webster’s Collegiate). Diapraxis is an emergent culture of communication and information-gathering skill-sets with roots in multisystemic and integral therapy, skilled Dynamic Facilitators able to reflect and summarize ecological language patterns, Positive Deviance therapists, EcoMinisters and EcoTherapists.

Orthopraxis is an ecological and permacultural frame for fusing Right-hemispheric intuitive temporal orthodoxy with Left-hemispheric deductive, reflective, and octavely-patterned sensory  intent and practice. Diapraxis reiteratively and redundantly informs through what we do and do not do, in dialogue with what we say and do not say; a primal fractal frame for collectively imaging our emergent orthopraxis.

This communication and information-systemic transition from focused dialogue, expanding toward focused and disciplined diapraxis may culturally synergize with older, more religious philosophical paradigms and memes like “compassionate mindfulness” and “love.”

Buckminster Fuller understood and intended the dynamics and geometrics of “love” as analogically and ecologically equivalent to double-bound appositional flow of time-mutual awareness; synergy is dia-ergetic, mutually positively grateful and gravitational. Fuller’s synergy may be to Basic Positive Attendance as his comprehension is to compassionate mindfulness.

Standard
Man/Sha Legends

Dr. Beaver’s Win-Win EcoTherapy Game

So, this year our Permaculture Communications Class project will hope to design a cooperative, yet fun, EcoTherapy Game. We will do this together, but let me give you some ideas that came to me in the middle of last night’s full moon cycle. So you know this is going to be good, right?

OK, what if we cast Information issues within a hierarchy of discernment authority to defer to nutritious health and economic prosperity values. So options available are restricted by giving preference to those that are at least positive/negative value balanced in both ecological and economic categories. This should have the effect of minimizing loss, pain, suffering, and dissonance, using normative Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) binary system standards, for positive value optimization, using Bayesian trend analysis.

Now, this is a Win-Win gaming frame, so we prioritize positive information value power and authority by using a principle of mutual lowest subsidiarity default. So, if a Win-Lose value issue dispute arises at the individual level, then the resolution frame goes to the population of the individual’s family, if the family presents the issue to their community, then the resolution frame incorporates that family’s community, if the community cannot resolve the issue to the satisfaction of both the family and the community representatives, then the frame goes out to representatives of the State, or Province, or Bioregion, then to national representatives, and globally only in the event of a national failure to find a mutually acceptable win-win indigenous strategy, which seems likely with regard to climate change concerns, for example, but probably not quite so much about your grandmother’s unfortunate habit of carrying an unsheathed paring knife concealed in the back pocket of her dungarees. But, please notice, this game design intends to be family-based, or rooted–not exclusively marketed to those desperate 16 year olds hiding down in your basements waiting for the satellites to fall, playing their Win-Lose cosmological disaster games.

Let’s take a familiar and long-standing ethical dilemma between the individual and society: If we had a citizen who refused to pay that portion of federal taxes currently allocated toward the production of death and the destruction of property, these would probably show up in our positive ecology value column as ecologically dysfunctional, and therefore negative values; that is, death, decay, dissonance, and destruction are each an indicator of harm, disvalue, dissonant Information string-trend frequencies. These are each and all ecologically negative trend projections. So, a State regulation that appeared to the individual to be dissonant with his or her biosystem’s positive productive outcomes might also contribute to the demise of everyone’s biosystemic health and welfare. I think this might be at least a reasonably moderate level of global human collapse, probably bringing along several other vulnerable species.

Our EcoTherapy Game might involve a national resolution platform to reconsider options like permitting conscientious objectors to not pay their war tax portion so long as that same amount of currency is transparently invested for positive socioeconomic outcomes, such as cooperatives and locally controlled ecological and economic network development.

On the other hand, a socioecological pathologist, and perhaps to some extent we each participate in socioecological pathology, but some more frequently and dysfunctionally than others, brought to the justice system for violating a law, such as evading paying people in a corporation’s own community a living wage by moving production, packaging, and customer service operations to another biosystem, thereby increasing carbon footprint for transportation, and where cost of living in U.S. dollar equivalencies is much lower, thereby further eroding the value of indigenous currency, and further destabilizing the economic and ecological systems in another place. This begins to smell like taking a shit in somebody else’s water, most anybody else’s water, the further away from where I sleep the better, and would be an illegitimate Lose-Lose strategy with disvalues dominating values in both our ecological and economic categories of available options. I strongly recommend that we take off our Ecological Win-Win gaming table, any of these sociocultural and economic Lose-Lose strategies. But, carefully, therapeutically.

So, OK, where was I?  Oh yes, these ecodislogical corporate heads meet with community or state representatives for dispute resolution using a Basic Attendance positive, non-violent, dynamically reiterative, issue resolution framework. Compassionately mindful eco-therapists, both humanist and feminist, using their most inclusively empathetic positive communication and regenerative information skills, talk about, perhaps even role play, perhaps even playing the EcoTherapy Game together, demonstrate the positives and negatives economically and ecologically that they see in the corporate heads’ investment strategy, mindfully, and therefore gratefully, mentoring a hope and faith in mutually subsidiary positive dialogue and discernment. “We’re all in this mess together and we’ll all figure it out together, in a way that works for everyone. No one is allowed to walk away from this table feeling like they just lost something they really need.”

The EcoTherapist’s primary discernment function is to understand why these corporate heads behave as they do, what are the positive economic and  ecological outcomes, short-term and long-term, extending out over the next 7 generations? The negatives are self-evident and not useful to the initial stages of dialogue. Can the EcoTherapist find similar functions and dynamics within her/his own relationships to self, others, natural systems, Earth? In this light, the EcoTherapist can best mentor appropriate behavior, something they have actually done under similar ethical circumstances, that avoids violating the Golden Rule and most any other natural and evolutionary and ecological law that I can imagine, within a

Polynomial +1-Yang QBit trend analysis

magnetically balanced-as-equal to

-(Not-Polynomial) time and space information -(0)-Yin QBit 4-Based binary information processing system, CQI design standard [perhaps a bicameral cytosine processor network].

Our bicameral information analysis network will follow reverse temporal trends to optimize Win-Win scenarios and proposals, so a Global Win-Win hierarchical outcome stage of balanced +/- (0)-Core Vector cannot be achieved until every nation achieves +/- (0) value balance in both economic and ecological categories, and no nation can achieve 0-sum balance until every bioregion or state or province within that nation achieves 0-sum balance, and so on down through the community in mutual subsidiary relationship with families, and families with individuals within their families, so this Win-Win reverse-hierarchical default invests everyone in everyone else’s messes, leaving no one behind, feeling like they do not belong to what we are working on together within this EcoTherapy Game. Remember we can’t crowdsource a Win-Win Game and declare it won if even one of the players reports a deficit–a default (+/- 0) outcome for any player is no more than, or less than, what the player entered the game with. That’s more of a Draw-Draw Game. So, I don’t know, maybe our EcoTherapy Game hopes to be Win-Win at the global level, with every entity having a positive balance at the end, but perhaps a Win-Or-Draw-0-balanced Consequences is a more realistic thought, something just this side of paradise.

And, individuals could play this game in each moment of their thoughts and words and actions and absorption of nutrient choices, until they are able to strategize an eco-soul (0)-sum universe with +/- binary balance, using the Prime TrimTab Permaculture Design Optimization Standard of Greatest Abundance/Least Dissonant Loss of information and function, and frequency, and dynamic force, and gravitational flow synergy, which I think might equal positive ecological evolution in this hierarchically revolving Regenesis Theory.

Now, those of you who are taking careful notes may have noticed that reference to QBits, meaning Information Bits within a binary digital information processing system, or maybe not just that. You may also be aware that we have a lot of confusion right now about this QBit quantification of Information flow business, not to mention that whole thing about whether we have sufficiently proven that Polynomial Explicately Ordered Information is reverse-equivalent, formally, nomially, ecologically, metrically, energetically, culturally, and linguistically with NonPolynomial time and space. Some Information Development Theorists claim QBits are what is not real energy or information; others think of them more as heuristic vacuums of information at the proximate end of energy-frequency strings; absent, static, entropic, vacuous pockets within the functional dimensional perspective of observation at any one vector in spacetime. But, I think Buckminster Fuller may have also seen these positive information QBit vacuums as negative binomial knots of bi-functional frequency trend unraveling, rather like David Bohm’s ink drops, unraveling as positive spacetime information but potentially reweaving, under controlled reverse-temporal re-formative “information-memory” value assumptions.

In positive trending polynomial spacetime, these QBit knots of negentropy remain -(-P) [for Polynomial and for Positive Bayesian analytic appositional correlated dis-information] decaying information, perhaps coded reverse temporally as concave-aptic-interior by ‘within’ confluent nuclear mutual-immune-“without dissonance” structural default space-gaps. In normative RNA code development, QBit non-polynomial folds, also binomial gap-ends of vibrant-frequency information-strings, temporally infolds “closer-later-lower” OVER more “distant-earlier-higher” [probably inclusive of magnetic North as +]. Cytosine (C) functions in this prime-information codex system as appositional temporal reversal “constant not-immune” = appositively reflective of Uracil. C functions as a constant -(-)P dysfunction negative non-correlative reverse Bayesian temporal polarity within a balanced P OVER NP binomial metric assumption, rather typical of binary digital information processing systems dependent on +/- electromagnetic balanced energy frequency assumptions. If there isn’t an implied 0 for every explicate 1, then our information system itself is out of balance. This -(-) = + Information Polynomial is analogous to the dynamics of (-)Yin = (+)Yang, just as (+)Yin = (-)Yang form, function, frequency, flow, and force/power in Taoism, maybe.

So, there are +Yang QBits and -Yin QBits with temporal relative constant equivalencies within natural ecological, physical systems, like human bodies, each with its own chi-soul polarity, right through the spine and between the right and left lobes. Now, human minds try to keep all this stuff in balance, which is, according to Julian Jaynes, perhaps why our mammalian brain has pushed out some bicameral information processors, although I think our human natural version went from older Right-brain dominance to now a bit too much Left-deductive, reiterative, ego-more-than-eco-speciated-centric, languaged Western and Northern hemisphere, and male-dominant cultures, all giving historical evidence that Yang Culture and Yin Culture are still issuing exclamations about ecological wisdom v. economic serenity. Which, I think, brings us back to the ecological purpose of this EcoTherapy Win-Win Game design project.

So, what questions and concerns and resonance does all this evoke for you?

Standard
Uncategorized

Raising Secrets

Imagine you might accept your anomaly,

an extraordinary gift of nature,

intrinsic to your charism and story.

Perhaps your secret brings no harm,

addiction or violence

to yourself or others.

Then, sharing where you might find trust

to recognize unusual with no prejudgment,

both positive and negative inclusinations,

may be the wisest, yet terrifying,

path toward further self-acceptance

and discernment;

avoiding eisegetical extreme of harmful hubris

toward yourself

could optimize your positive dance

of gifts borne gracefully to us.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Our Not-So-Noisy Nest

We don’t sound right.

Too left-brained I hope

better balance might cool our home

relationships

lives

words

as richly dense Eternal Moment compost

feeds diversely rooted populations.

 

Lake’s surface ripples with

leaf blowers whining

jets roaring overhead

cars exhaustively streaming by

like cheerless tears of toxic bubbles.

 

Beneath

before

this vaporous high pitched system

still lives mountainous resonant joy.

Birds still tweet,

not just people,

rivers trickle and spray white noise

ocean surf still ebbs and flows

within our circulating systems.

 

Our hearts and lungs and minds

remember catholic lotus root systems

recall bisonic natural sync between

nature made commodious spirit lakes

reflecting

revealing

flowering

EarthTribe discovered Orthodox Tao mountain tops

natural tree-lined valleys in

regenerative systemed (0) core Prime Relationship

of left-brained Yang remembering

Yin’s true value as

polynomial is non-polynomial reversed

is binomially balanced

compassionately deep lake reflecting mindful mountain

dynamically harmonious dance of

peaceful twinkling

rippling

lapping

laughing thermonormative warm and slow relationship.

 

Communication,

positive discernment,

our bicameral vocation’s peaceful yeasty nest racing

embracing

evolving

revolving

rhythming

beating

breathing

thinking

choosing

soaring through humanity.

 

But, quietly, please?

Some of us are trying not to sleep.

 

Standard
Uncategorized

Following Revolutionary Dialogue

Back in the day, a “follower” was someone who had faith in the leadership of another person; a leader trusted, in part, due to their adherence to some faith in a solution to dissonance. Mystics and prophets, politicians and mobsters, tycoons and polymathic geniuses, teachers and ministers had a “following.” Since the internet, this Transitional Generation and their allied elders would add to this list: bloggers and on-line journalists.

I have been following the NCDD discernment strings pertaining to the desire for a global political revolution and the more technical desire to facilitate large-scale grassroots  discussions about what we do and what we do not want as a global human species. In several of the senses of being a “follower,” I have also been following Joanna Macy’s peaceful revolutionary strategy as it unfolds internationally.  While I do not have any authority to interpret, or speak for, someone I greatly respect, and would not want to exceed my place as a follower, rather than a mentor, I think the connection between Joanna Macy and the NCDD listserve is that both urgently desire an internationally sustainable Earth ecological economic design system.

That gold-standard “design system” must be resonant and a well-patterned, balanced, theorem. More than a conjecture about what might inspire this peaceful revolution. A conjecture says “isn’t this an interesting pattern, a dynamic analogy?”; while a theorem adds “we have a positive teleological function for that form-pattern.” Conjectures are not yet polynomial memes. Theorems are polynomial, and binomial, patterns.

Faith in “ecological economics” fits more comfortably into Macy’s (0)-Centric Zen Theorem than into the NCDD discussion and culture. However, probably every NCDD member recognizes that the term “faith community” has an internal redundancy just as the term “faithless community” sounds oxymoronic. There is no community, no dialogue, no communication, no ecologic, no probability of cooperative economic intent where there is no faith that we are all in this mess together, whatever it may be, and that the primordial rules of discernment are best attuned to a radically inclusive “Golden Rule” that we must always treat others, regardless of species, and regardless of whether currently living or not yet living, as we wish ourselves to be sustainably and confluently, even therapeutically, treated.

It seems to both the Macy and NCDD Revolutionaries that there not only already is a global consensus in this basic positive teleological faith, but further, this global consensus is quickly learning to find each other across traditional divides of borders, water, special interests, and language–all we need, which we now have, is a global information system. The discussion has well begun, now it is time to move that from a perhaps sometimes too free-wheeling, and polarizing, discussion, to a positive discernment process. In other words, as a species, we are moving from our already shared positive teleological conjecture toward a positive teleological discernment theorem.

Perhaps NCDD culture is evolving this positive discernment theorem. As I have said perhaps too often, if we look at Positive Deviance, Appreciate Inquiry, Nonviolent Communication, and Dynamic Facilitation as each establishing a mutual discernment event culture that is the opposite of Cognitive Dissonance Theory [we tend to not hear well what does not fit with our current learned landscape; on the other hand we tend to learn quickly from what we all agree we don’t want], perhaps this is our Positive Confluence Theorem:

We hear very well, and revolutionarily embrace, what does fit most abundantly with all of our current learned landscapes. When we mutually acknowledge that we each do trust that we live in a positive-trending teleological economy and ecology. when that is our mutual intent and practice, then we not only comprehend, but incarnate and mentor, this Positive Confluence Theorem.

This Positive Teleological Theorem predicts that we will, globally, increase our investment in cooperative economies and pedagogy and design systems as three faces of one cooperative ecology.  As we do so, our current over-reliance on competitive strategies for learning, making a living together, building a polyculture together, will fade away into our collective memory of “back in the pre-millennial day.”

 

Standard